X-ray Use in Chest Imaging in Emergency Department on the Basis of Cost and Effectiveness

Evaluating the utility of chest x-rays for non-traumatic chest pain in Australia- a retrospective cohort study

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to quantify the proportion of chest x-rays (CXRs) for non-traumatic chest pain (NTCP) in the emergency department (ED) that were abnormal and assess the clinical significance of these abnormalities. We also aimed to explore the variables associated with abnormal and clinically significant abnormal CXRs, to predict a population where CXRs can be safely avoided.

METHODS

A single center retrospective cohort study was conducted including all adult patients presenting to a single ED with NTCP between 01 Jan 2022 and 31 Dec 2022. We categorized the CXRs into abnormal, or normal as reported by a radiologist. Abnormalities were categorized to be clinically significant based on potential or actual changes in patient management. The association of patient demographics, presenting vital signs, and clinical characteristics with clinically significant abnormalities were explored using multivariable logistic regression analysis.

RESULTS

There were 3,419 eligible patient encounters included for analysis. Of these, 746 (21.8%; 95%CI: 20.4-23.2%) CXRs had at least one abnormality detected. There were 218 (6.4%; 95%CI: 6.1-7.9%) CXRs deemed to have clinically significant abnormalities. Age categories of 50-64 years (aOR 1.64; 95%CI 1.04-2.60), and age > 64 years (aOR 2.32; 95%CI: 1.51-3.57), history of congestive heart failure (CHF) (aOR 1.86; 95%CI: 1.08-3.21), smoking (aOR 1.27; 95%CI: 1.04-1.57), hemoptysis (aOR 6.69; 95%CI: 1.92-23.33), diminished lung sounds (aOR 4.87; 95%CI:2.95-8.05), rales (aOR 4.49; 95%CI: 2.82-7.15), and abnormal oxygen saturations (aOR 1.98; 95%CI: 1.40-2.79) were associated with clinically significant abnormalities on CXRs. In the absence of these variables, 1.4% (95%CI: 0.6-2.6%) of CXRs were abnormal with clinical significance.

CONCLUSIONS

CXRs have a relatively high yield of abnormalities among patients with NTCP. However, some CXRs could be safely avoided in the absence of variables associated with clinically significant abnormalities. Further validation of these clinical characteristics is required before translation to clinical practice.

Consensus Between Radiologists, Specialists in Internal Medicine, and AI Software on Chest X-Rays in a Hospital-at-Home Service: Prospective Observational Study

Background

Home hospitalization is a care modality growing in popularity worldwide. Telemedicine-driven hospital-at-home (HAH) services could replace traditional hospital departments for selected patients. Chest x-rays typically serve as a key diagnostic tool in such cases.

Objective

The implementation, analysis, and clinical assimilation of chest x-rays into an HAH service has not been described yet. Our objective is to introduce this essential information to the realm of HAH services for the first time worldwide.

Methods

The study involved a prospective follow-up, description, and analysis of the HAH patient population who underwent chest x-rays at home. A comparative analysis was performed to evaluate the level of agreement among three interpretation modalities: a radiologist, a specialist in internal medicine, and a designated artificial intelligence (AI) algorithm.

Results

Between February 2021 and May 2023, 300 chest radiographs were performed at the homes of 260 patients, with the median age being 78 (IQR 65-87) years. The most frequent underlying morbidity was cardiovascular disease (n=185, 71.2%). Of the x-rays, 286 (95.3%) were interpreted by a specialist in internal medicine, 29 (9.7%) by a specialized radiologist, and 95 (31.7%) by the AI software. The overall raw agreement level among these three modalities exceeded 90%. The consensus level evaluated using the Cohen κ coefficient showed substantial agreement (κ=0.65) and moderate agreement (κ=0.49) between the specialist in internal medicine and the radiologist, and between the specialist in internal medicine and the AI software, respectively.

Conclusions

Chest x-rays play a crucial role in the HAH setting. Rapid and reliable interpretation of these x-rays is essential for determining whether a patient requires transfer back to in-hospital surveillance. Our comparative results showed that interpretation by an experienced specialist in internal medicine demonstrates a significant level of consensus with that of the radiologists. However, AI algorithm-based interpretation needs to be further developed and revalidated prior to clinical applications.

Physician perspectives about the diagnosis and management of acute chest syndrome

BACKGROUND

Acute chest syndrome (ACS) is the leading cause of mortality, accounting for 25% of all deaths among individuals with sickle cell disease (SCD). There is a lack of evidence-based laboratory and clinical risk stratification guidelines for the diagnosis and management of ACS.

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

To better understand physician practices for the management of ACS in the United States, we created an ACS Working Group including hematology and transfusion medicine physicians from four different SCD treatment centers in the United States. The working group created a physician survey that included physician demographics and ACS diagnostic criteria that they had to rate. The survey also included three case scenarios to assess physician attitudes about the management of ACS. Management options included supportive and preventive strategies in addition to transfusion therapy options.

RESULTS

Out of 455 physicians who received the survey, 195 responded (response rate = 43%). The respondents were primarily hematology/oncology physicians. The responses showed wide variability among physicians in how diagnostic criteria for ACS are used and how physicians risk-stratify ACS patients in their practice. The responses also reflected variability in the use of transfusions for ACS.

DISCUSSION

Based on our results, we conclude that ACS is diagnosed and managed inconsistently among expert physicians, especially in their transfusion practices due to a lack of consensus on risk stratification criteria. Our data suggest an urgent need for well-designed prospective studies to provide evidence-based guidelines and minimize management variability among physicians who care for individuals with SCD and ACS.

Establishing Local Diagnostic Reference Levels for Head Computed Tomography Examinations

Background/Objectives: Head Computed Tomography (CT) is an essential diagnostic tool for identifying brain pathologies and visualizing blood vessels. However, CT exposes patients to ionizing radiation, making it necessary to establish local diagnostic reference levels (DRLs) to ensure patient safety. This study aimed to establish DRLs for head CT scans and assess the influence of patient characteristics on radiation dose. Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on 2043 non-contrast and 488 contrast-enhanced head CT scans performed between 1 July 2023 and 31 March 2024 using a SIEMENS SOMATOM Definition Edge machine. Computed Tomography Dose Index (CTDIvol) and Dose-Length Product (DLP) values were analyzed, with DRLs set at the 75th percentile. The influence of gender, height, and weight on radiation dose was also evaluated. Results: The DRL for both non-contrast and contrast-enhanced scans was 58.18 mGy for CTDIvol and 1018.11 mGy·cm for DLP per acquisition. Total DLP was 2046.09 mGy·cm for contrast-enhanced and 1027.99 mGy·cm for non-contrast scans. No significant correlation was found between patient characteristics and radiation dose, allowing for a uniform DRL to be established. Conclusions: Uniform DRLs were successfully established for head CT scans, ensuring safe radiation doses for both non-contrast and contrast-enhanced studies. The lack of correlation between patient-specific factors and dose supports the use of standardized DRLs, contributing to optimized radiation safety in head CT diagnostics.

Automated Quality Control Solution for Radiographic Imaging of Lung Diseases

Background/Objectives: Radiography is an essential and low-cost diagnostic method in pulmonary medicine that is used for the early detection and monitoring of lung diseases. An adequate and consistent image quality (IQ) is crucial to ensure accurate diagnosis and effective patient management. This pilot study evaluates the feasibility and effectiveness of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA)'s remote and automated quality control (QC) methodology, which has been tested in multiple imaging centers. Methods: The data, collected between April and December 2022, included 47 longitudinal data sets from 22 digital radiographic units. Participants submitted metadata on the radiography setup, exposure parameters, and imaging modes. The database comprised 968 exposures, each representing multiple image quality parameters and metadata of image acquisition parameters. Python scripts were developed to collate, analyze, and visualize image quality data. Results: The pilot survey identified several critical issues affecting the future implementation of the IAEA method, as follows: (1) difficulty in accessing raw images due to manufacturer restrictions, (2) variability in IQ parameters even among identical X-ray systems and image acquisitions, (3) inconsistencies in phantom construction affecting IQ values, (4) vendor-dependent DICOM tag reporting, and (5) large variability in SNR values compared to other IQ metrics, making SNR less reliable for image quality assessment. Conclusions: Cross-comparisons among radiography systems must be taken with cautious because of the dependence on phantom construction and acquisition mode variations. Awareness of these factors will generate reliable and standardized quality control programs, which are crucial for accurate and fair evaluations, especially in high-frequency chest imaging.

Approaches to reduce medical imaging departments' environmental impact: A scoping review

INTRODUCTION

Global warming stands as a paramount public health issue of our time, and it is fundamental to explore approaches to green medical imaging departments/(MID). This study aims to map the existing actions in the literature that promote sustainable development in MID towards the promotion of environmental impact reduction.

METHODS

Following the JBI methodology and the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR), this literature search was conducted on MEDLINE, Embase and CINAHL to encompass studies published after 2013. Combinations of keywords and relevant terms related to environmental sustainability, recycling, medical waste, and greening radiology were applied for this review. Three independent reviewers screened abstracts, titles, and eligible full-text. Disagreement was solved through consensus.

RESULTS

38 out of 4630 articles met all inclusion criteria, and four additional articles were identified and added through reference search. A third of the studies included were published after 2022, and most were conducted in developed countries (36/41). Articles focused on computed tomography (9/41), magnetic resonance imaging (6/41), interventional radiology (4/41), conventional radiography (4/41), ultrasound (2/41), mixed modalities (10/41), or not applicable to an imaging modality (6/41). Four principal categories were identified to decrease ecological footprint: energy consumption, waste management, justification and environmental pollution.

CONCLUSION

To minimise the environmental impact of MIDs raising awareness and promoting education is fundamental. Examinations must be justified adequately, energy consumption must be reduced, and waste management practices need to be implemented. Further studies are required to prioritise the most effective strategies, supporting decision-making among stakeholders.

IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE

Several strategies are already possible to implement to reduce the environmental impact of MIDs and improve the healthcare outcomes for patients.

Pulmonary Physician Consultancy in Emergency Services in Turkiye (PuPCEST) - a cross-sectional multicenter study

Pulmonology is one of the branches that frequently receive consultation requests from the emergency department. Pulmonology consultation (PC) is requested from almost all clinical branches due to the diagnosis and treatment of any respiratory condition, preoperative evaluation, or postoperative pulmonary problems. The aim of our study was to describe the profile of the pulmonology consultations received from emergency departments in Turkiye. A total of 32 centers from Turkiye (the PuPCEST Study Group) were included to the study. The demographic, clinical, laboratory and radiological data of the consulted cases were examined. The final result of the consultation and the justification of the consultation by the consulting pulmonologist were recorded. We identified 1712 patients, 64% of which applied to the emergency department by themselves and 41.4% were women. Eighty-five percent of the patients had a previously diagnosed disease. Dyspnea was the reason for consultation in 34.7% of the cases. The leading radiological finding was consolidation (13%). Exacerbation of preexisting lung disease was present in 39% of patients. The most commonly established diagnoses by pulmonologists were chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (19%) and pneumonia (12%). While 35% of the patients were discharged, 35% were interned into the chest diseases ward. The majority of patients were hospitalized and treated conservatively. It may be suggested that most of the applications would be evaluated in the pulmonology outpatient clinic which may result in a decrease in emergency department visits/consultations. Thus, improvements in the reorganization of the pulmonology outpatient clinics and follow-up visits may positively contribute emergency admission rates.

Does the use of computed tomography scenogram alone enable diagnosis in cases of bowel obstruction?

BACKGROUND

Ileus is a pathological condition of the abdomen that presents as a medical emergency. It is characterized by potential complications such as perforation and ischemia, which can lead to significant morbidity and mortality if not promptly addressed. The successful management of ileus relies heavily on the timely and precise identification of the condition. While conventional radiography (CR) is commonly used as the primary diagnostic tool, its accuracy in identifying obstructions ranges from 46% to 80%. Furthermore, the diagnostic accuracy of identifying the location and etiology of intestinal obstruction by CR is limited, therefore making computed tomography (CT) the ideal imaging modality in this regard.

AIM

To determine the presence of acute bowel obstruction (BO) on abdominal CT scenogram images and the accuracy of determining its possible location, taking into account the experience of the observers.

METHODS

A retrospective screening was conducted on an ensemble of 46 individuals who presented to the emergency department between January 2021 and January 2022 with severe abdominal pain and were subsequently monitored for suspected ileus. The abdominal CT scans of these patients were assessed by three radiologists with varying levels of experience (1, 3, and 10 years) at different intervals (1 mo apart). The evaluation focused on determining the presence or absence of BO, as well as identifying the potential location of the obstruction (small bowel or large bowel). The study employed Kappa statistics to assess inter-observer variances, while the McNamer test was used to evaluate obstruction and segmentation discrepancies between observations. A significance level of P < 0.05 was determined to indicate statistical significance.

RESULTS

Out of the total sample size of 46 patients, 15 individuals (32.6%) were identified as female, while the remaining 31 individuals (67.4%) were identified as male. The ultimate diagnosis of 42 instances (91.3%) indicated ileus resulting from mechanical obstruction (MO). Among these patients, 14 (33%) experienced obstruction in the large bowel (LB), while 28 (66%) experienced obstruction in the small bowel (SB). The initial evaluation yielded sensitivity rates of 76.19%, 83.31%, and 83.33%, and diagnostic accuracy rates of 69.56%, 76.08%, and 80.43% for the detection of BO among the three observers. The initial study revealed that the average sensitivity of three observers in detecting the presence of ileus caused by MO was 80.94%, while the diagnostic accuracy was 75.35%. Based on the first evaluation, the senior observer demonstrated the highest sensitivity (85.71%), negative predictive value (92.60%), and diagnostic accuracy (80.43%) when accurately estimating the thick and thin segmentation, as per the final diagnosis. There was no statistically significant disparity observed in the sensitivities pertaining to the identification of ileus during the second assessment, as well as the precise determination of the segment level inside the LB or SB, when comparing the second and third observers. Nevertheless, although there was no statistically significant alteration in the detection rate of ileus by the first observer, there was a notable rise in the accuracy rate of segment estimating (73.91%). The senior assessor had a higher level of accuracy in assessing the existence of ileus and segmentation compared to the other evaluators in both evaluations.

CONCLUSION

The findings of our study indicate that the sensitivity and accuracy rates of abdominal CT scenogram scans in diagnosing acute MOs are similar to or greater than those of CR. Additionally, the study revealed that radiologists with more experience demonstrated a higher likelihood of accurately predicting the existence and potential localization of MO compared to their less experienced counterparts.

Are we aware of radiation: A study about necessity of diagnostic X-ray exposure

BACKGROUND

Total exposure to ionizing radiation has nearly doubled in the last two decades. This increase is primarily due to increased computed tomography (CT) exposure. Concerns have been raised about the risks associated with patients' exposure to medical imaging radiation, which can increase a person's lifetime risk of developing cancer. Preventing unnecessary examinations becomes critical at this point. To avoid unnecessary examinations, it is necessary to understand the demanding process.

AIM

To ascertain clinicians' awareness of and reasons for requesting a CT examination.

METHODS

We developed an online questionnaire that included 20 questions about clinicians' awareness of radiation safety and their reasons for requesting a CT examination, as well as demographic information such as age, gender, and year of medical practice experience. Additionally, we asked participants the number of CT scans requested in a month, the patients' questions and approaches about the imaging method, the effect of the patient's previous imaging history on the current imaging request, whether they believed that they had sufficient information about radiation doses, and whether they requested CT without an indication. We administered the questionnaire to clinicians from a variety of different professions in four different cities.

RESULTS

A total of 195 clinicians participated. Internal medicine specialists were the most crowded group (38/195, 19.5%). Mean age of the population was 33.66 ± 5.92 years. Mean year of experience was 9.01 ± 5.96. Mean number of requested CT scans in a month was 36.88 ± 5.86. Forty-five (23.1%) participants stated that they requested CT scans without clinical indication. The most common reasons for CT scan requests were work load, fear of malpractice, and patient demand/insistence.

CONCLUSION

CT scan requests are influenced by a variety of factors, both internal and external to the doctors and patients. Raising awareness of radiation safety and reducing fear of malpractice by limiting the number of patients per physician may result in a reduction in unnecessary CT examinations and ionizing radiation exposure.

Characterizing and quantifying low-value diagnostic imaging internationally: a scoping review

BACKGROUND

Inappropriate and wasteful use of health care resources is a common problem, constituting 10-34% of health services spending in the western world. Even though diagnostic imaging is vital for identifying correct diagnoses and administrating the right treatment, low-value imaging-in which the diagnostic test confers little to no clinical benefit-is common and contributes to inappropriate and wasteful use of health care resources. There is a lack of knowledge on the types and extent of low-value imaging. Accordingly, the objective of this study was to identify, characterize, and quantify the extent of low-value diagnostic imaging examinations for adults and children.

METHODS

A scoping review of the published literature was performed. Medline-Ovid, Embase-Ovid, Scopus, and Cochrane Library were searched for studies published from 2010 to September 2020. The search strategy was built from medical subject headings (Mesh) for Diagnostic imaging/Radiology OR Health service misuse/Medical overuse OR Procedures and Techniques Utilization/Facilities and Services Utilization. Articles in English, German, Dutch, Swedish, Danish, or Norwegian were included.

RESULTS

A total of 39,986 records were identified and, of these, 370 studies were included in the final synthesis. Eighty-four low-value imaging examinations were identified. Imaging of atraumatic pain, routine imaging in minor head injury, trauma, thrombosis, urolithiasis, after thoracic interventions, fracture follow-up and cancer staging/follow-up were the most frequently identified low-value imaging examinations. The proportion of low-value imaging varied between 2 and 100% inappropriate or unnecessary examinations.

CONCLUSIONS

A comprehensive list of identified low-value radiological examinations for both adults and children are presented. Future research should focus on reasons for low-value imaging utilization and interventions to reduce the use of low-value imaging internationally.

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION

PROSPERO: CRD42020208072.

Does shifting to professional emergency department staffing affect the decision for chest radiography?

BACKGROUND

The study aims to determine whether shifting to professional emergency department (ED) teams leads to a higher rate of radiologic workup.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed a total of 2,000 patients presenting to the ED of a tertiary teaching hospital in two time periods: group 1 (G1) comprised 1,000 consecutive patients enrolled from December 21, 2012 to January 5, 2013 (all patients were examined by an internal medicine specialist); group 2 (G2) comprised 1,000 consecutive patients enrolled from December 21, 2018 to January 3, 2019 (all patients were examined by an emergency physician).

RESULTS

The chest X-ray (CXR) was performed in 40.6% of all patients. There was no difference in the frequency of CXR (38.9% in G1 vs. 42.3% in G2, P=0.152). More CXRs were performed in G2 patients older than 65 years, in female patients older than 65 years, in patients presenting during the evening and night shifts or off-hours, in patients with a history of malignancy, in patients with gastrointestinal bleeding, and in patients with bradycardia, but fewer in patients presenting with arrhythmia. No difference in the rates of pathological CXR was found (47.3% in G1 vs. 52.2% in G2, P=0.186). Compared with G2, higher sensitivity and specificity were obtained for the binary logistic regression model predicting pathological findings in G1.

CONCLUSIONS

Shifting to professional ED teams does not increase radiologic workup. By implementing deliberate usage of ultrasound, some self-governing procedures, case-oriented investigations, and center-specific recommendations, unnecessary radiologic workup can be avoided. Professional ED teams could lead to a higher standard of emergency care.

Acute aortic syndrome and radiology liability in Italy: Case reports and medico-legal considerations

The trend for medical malpractice claims has increased in recent years, both in the USA and in Europe. Although diagnostic radiology is not considered a high-risk field, malpractice claims in this area follow this general trend. The most common legal action taken against radiologists includes failure to diagnose, poor communication between physicians, failure to supervise technologists properly and improper procedures. Recently, the Italian Civil Supreme Court delivered a judgment (Cass. Civ., N.10158-18) regarding the liability of radiologists, stating that in radiological practice, a correct and timely execution of the diagnostic investigation is required. By contrast, the same judgment states that requesting further clinical consultations and/or the execution of in-depth diagnostic examinations are not within their duties. Considering this judgment, we report two cases of radiologist malpractice and related responsibility for negligent conduct regarding the diagnosis of thoracic aortic dissection and the prevention and management of acute aortic syndrome.

A comparison of benign positional vertigo and stroke patients presenting to the emergency department with vertigo or dizziness

PURPOSE

To compare imaging utilization between patients presenting to the emergency department (ED) with vertigo and dizziness (VDS) who are diagnosed with stroke and benign paroxysmal positional vertigo (BPPV).

METHODS

All patients presenting to the ED with VDS (January 2014-June 2018) were identified. Those with a discharge diagnosis of stroke and BPPV were analyzed.

RESULTS

17,884 patients presented to with VDS. 452 were diagnosed with BPPV and 174 with acute stroke. 55.7% of stroke patients had at least one neurologic symptom beyond VDS, 63.8% had a positive neurologic exam, and 80.5% had either; 90.2% had at least one stroke risk factor (RF). 42.0% of BPPV patients received imaging, of which 24.7% had neurologic symptoms beyond VDS, 16.3% had neurologic exam findings, and 34.2% had either (P < 0.001, as compared to stroke). 43 patients (22.6%) lacked neurologic symptoms, exam findings, and stroke RFs; 40 had an adequate HINTS (head impulse, nystagmus, skew) exam. The most common imaging modality received by BPPV patients was plain CT Head (54.2%), followed by CT/CTA (43.7%), and MRI brain (26.3%). CT head was the initial imaging of choice in 44.7% and CT/CTA in 42.6%.

CONCLUSIONS

Imaging utilization in BPPV patients presenting with VDS is high. The profile of patients with BPPV that received imaging was substantially more benign than that of stroke patients (a quarter had no neurologic symptoms, exam findings, or stroke RFs). The HINTS exam was underutilized, and computed tomography was heavily utilized despite well-established limitations in diagnosing posterior circulation strokes. This study highlights the need for increased training in the HINTS exam, narrowing of the scope for computed tomography, and a higher threshold for imaging patients with isolated VDS.