Training Radiology Residents to be Stewards in Healthcare Value

Residents’ Training in COVID-19 Pandemic Times: An Integrated Survey of Educational Process, Institutional Support, Anxiety and Depression by the Saudi Commission for Health Specialties (SCFHS)

In late December of 2019, the outbreak of coronavirus disease (COVID-19) was first reported in the city of Wuhan, the capital of Hubei province in China, and was declared a pandemic by the World Health Organization in March 2020. Globally, as of 8 July 2020, there have been 11,669,259 confirmed cases of COVID-19, including 539,906 deaths. In Saudi Arabia, the confirmed cases have already reached 223,327, with 161,096 patients confirmed to have recovered, and 2100 deaths. This study aims to determine the effect of the COVID-19 pandemic on the training programs of the Saudi Commission for Health Specialties (SCFHS) and assess trainees’ mental health status (i.e., anxiety and depression). Trainee evaluations on training programs were also sought in order to obtain insights for strategic planning necessary for curricular modifications or improvements to address the clinical learning needs of trainees during this pandemic. The main contribution of our work is an investigation of the incidence of depression and anxiety regarding COVID-19 within the community of residents and fellows. Furthermore, we elaborate on key responsive actions towards the enhancement of the mental health of trainees. Last but not least, we propose the Saudi Commission for Health Specialties (SCFHS) Model for Residents’ Mental Health Enhancement during the COVID-19 Pandemic, which consists of five integrative value layers for medical education and training, namely: the knowledge creation process and innovation; technological capabilities for personalized medicine and patient-centric healthcare with a social impact; innovative applications of technology-enhanced learning and web-based active learning approaches for medical training and education; residents’ wellbeing and the impact of COVID-19 in strategic layers. In our future work, we intend to enhance the proposed framework with studies on trainee satisfaction and the efficiency of different technology-enhanced learning platforms for medical education.

Advanced Quality Training in Radiology: Inaugural Report of a 2-Year Program

OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this study is to describe and analyze the outcomes of a 2-year advanced quality training program for radiology residents. MATERIALS AND METHODS. In 2016, the radiology quality committee of a quaternary health system created a hands-on 2-year advanced quality training curriculum for diagnostic and interventional radiology residents. Internal candidates with the following prerequisites submitted competitive applications: registration for a 2-day lean health care management course, completion of four or more Radiological Society of North America (RSNA) quality essentials certificates, identification of faculty mentor(s), selection of one quality improvement project to champion, and completion of a two-page essay summarizing interest in quality improvement, the proposed project, and its potential impact. Residents were required to attend monthly quality meetings, pursue their project and its derivatives, submit completed work for consideration to a national meeting and for publication, and present at departmental grand rounds. Outcomes were summarized using descriptive statistics. RESULTS. Five residents submitted four projects for consideration, and all five were selected. In addition to the four submitted projects, seven additional projects were pursued. Participants worked on nine local and three multicenter process improvements, gave one to two grand rounds each, presented three oral and five poster presentations, generated eight publications, received three awards, formed 14 mentor-mentee relationships, and influenced local and multisite practice patterns. Participants reported gaining firsthand experience in quality improvement principles and developing real-world leadership skills. CONCLUSION. A targeted 2-year curriculum emphasizing hands-on quality improvement experience with rich mentor-mentee relationships can produce meaningful results.

Administrative encounters in general practice: low value or hidden value care?

OBJECTIVE

To determine the frequency of general practice administrative encounters, and to determine whether they represent low value care.

DESIGN

Secondary analysis of data from the Bettering Evaluation and Care of Health (BEACH) dataset.

SETTING

1 568 100 GP-patient encounters in Australia, 2000-01 to 2015-16.

PARTICIPANTS

An annual nationally representative random sample of about 1000 GPs, who each recorded the details of 100 consecutive encounters with patients.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Proportions of general practice encounters that were potentially low value care encounters (among the patient's reasons for the encounter was at least one administrative, medication, or referral request) and potentially low value care only encounters (such reasons were the sole reason for the encounter). For 2015-16, we also examined other health care provided by GPs at these encounters.

RESULTS

During 2015-16, 18.5% (95% CI, 17.7-19.3%) of 97 398 GP-patient encounters were potentially low value care request encounters; 7.4% (95% CI, 7.0-7.9%) were potentially low value care only encounters. Administrative work was requested at 3.8% (95% CI, 3.5-4.0%) of GP visits, 35.4% of which were for care planning and coordination, 33.5% for certification, and 31.2% for other reasons. Medication requests were made at 13.1% (95% CI, 12.4-13.7%) of encounters; other health care was provided at 57.9% of medication request encounters, counselling, advice or education at 23.4%, and pathology testing was ordered at 16.7%. Referrals were requested at 2.8% (95% CI, 1.7-3.0%) of visits, at 69.4% of which additional health care was provided. The problems managed most frequently at potentially low value care only encounters were chronic diseases.

CONCLUSION

Most patients requested certificates, medications and referrals in the context of seeking help for other health needs. Additional health care, particularly for chronic diseases, was provided at most GP administrative encounters. The MBS Review should consider the hidden value of these encounters.