1
|
Zhang R, Xu X, Luo X, Huang P. "Building bridges"-communication education for residents in radiology: a scoping review. BMC MEDICAL EDUCATION 2024; 24:662. [PMID: 38877548 PMCID: PMC11179299 DOI: 10.1186/s12909-024-05660-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/06/2023] [Accepted: 06/12/2024] [Indexed: 06/16/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Good communication is an important professional attribute for radiologists. However, explorations of communication education and their outcomes in radiology residents are sparse. This scoping review aims to evaluate the existing literature on communication education for radiology residents, identify gaps in current practices, and suggest directions for future studies. METHODS A scoping review following the six-step approach of Arksey and O'Malley was undertaken. We searched through PubMed, Embase, ERIC, and Web of Science databases, focusing on communication education in radiology residents. RESULTS Sixteen of the 3096 identified articles were included in the analysis. Most studies (13/16) originated from the United States. The studies varied in study design, including quantitative, qualitative and mixed-methods approaches. The sample sizes of most studies were small to moderate, with more than half of the studies had fewer than 30 participants. The identified studies predominantly focused on communication with patients and healthcare professionals. The need for communication education, the efficacy of specific communication education programs, and the capability of some assessment tools for evaluating residents' communication skills were investigated. CONCLUSIONS This scoping review reveals the gap between the need for communication education and the lack of comprehensive education programs in radiology residents globally. Future studies should develop tailored interventions and use reliable assessment tools, engaging more participants with extended follow-up periods, and expand the scope of communication training to include all relevant stakeholders.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ruiting Zhang
- Department of Radiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University, School of Medicine, 88# Jiefang Road, Hangzhou, China.
| | - Xiaopei Xu
- Department of Radiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University, School of Medicine, 88# Jiefang Road, Hangzhou, China
| | - Xiao Luo
- Department of Radiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University, School of Medicine, 88# Jiefang Road, Hangzhou, China
| | - Peiyu Huang
- Department of Radiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University, School of Medicine, 88# Jiefang Road, Hangzhou, China
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Dutruel SP, Hentel KD, Hecht EM, Kadom N. Patient-Centered Radiology Communications: Engaging Patients as Partners. J Am Coll Radiol 2024; 21:7-18. [PMID: 37863150 DOI: 10.1016/j.jacr.2023.10.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/21/2023] [Revised: 10/12/2023] [Accepted: 10/13/2023] [Indexed: 10/22/2023]
Abstract
Patient-centered care is a model in which, by bringing the patient's perspective to the design and delivery of health care, we can better meet patients' needs, enhancing the quality of care. Patient-centered care requires finding ways to communicate effectively with a diverse patient population that has various levels of health literacy, cultural backgrounds, and unique needs and preferences. Moreover, multimedia resources have the potential to inform and educate patients promoting greater independence. In this review, we discuss the fundamentals of communication with the different modes used in radiology and the key elements of effective communication. Then, we highlight five opportunities along the continuum of care in the radiology practice in which we can improve communications to empower our patients and families and strengthen this partnership. Lastly, we discuss the importance on communication training of the workforce, optimizing and seamlessly integrating technology solutions into our workflows, and the need for patient feedback in the design and delivery of care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Silvina P Dutruel
- Department of Radiology, Weill Cornell Medical Center, New York, New York.
| | - Keith D Hentel
- Professor, Clinical Radiology, Executive Vice Chairman, Department of Radiology; Vice President, Weill Cornell Imaging at New York-Presbyterian, New York, New York
| | - Elizabeth M Hecht
- Vice Chair for Academic Affairs, Department of Radiology, Weill Cornell Medical Center, New York, New York. https://twitter.com/ehecht_md
| | - Nadja Kadom
- Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia; Director of Quality, Department of Radiology, Children's Healthcare of Atlanta, Georgia; Interim Director of Quality, Department of Radiology, Emory Healthcare, Atlanta, Georgia; Chair, Practice and Performance Improvement Committee, ARRS; and Chair, Metrics Committee, ACR
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Robinson KA, Staack SO, Patel BK, Lorans R, Sharpe RE, Kling JM, Maimone S, Pizzitola VJ. The Dense Breast Clinic: Initial Experience of a Patient-Centered Breast Imaging Clinic. JOURNAL OF BREAST IMAGING 2022; 4:582-589. [PMID: 38416998 DOI: 10.1093/jbi/wbac063] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/12/2022] [Indexed: 03/01/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Establish a radiologist-run consultation clinic to review breast density and supplemental screening exams (SSEs) directly with patients in response to breast density reporting laws. METHODS Breast radiologists opened and staffed a clinic for formal patient consultations regarding breast density and SSEs. An IRB-approved questionnaire assessed patient knowledge of breast density, SSEs, and encounter satisfaction. Comparative statistical analyses were performed on knowledge-based questions. RESULTS From February 2019 to February 2021, 294 reimbursable consultations were performed with 215 patients completing pre- and post-consultation questionnaires (survey response rate, 73%). Median patient age was 58 years (range, 34-86 years) and 9% (19/210) had a personal history of breast cancer. An increase in patient knowledge of breast density and SSEs was observed as follows: breast density categories (9% correct pre-consultation (20/215), 86% correct post-consultation (185/215), P < 0.001), dense breast effects on cancer risk (39% correct pre-consultation (83/215), 84% post-consultation (180/215)), mammogram sensitivity (90% correct pre-consultation (193/215), 94% post-consultation (201/215)), and increased cancer detection with SSEs (82% correct pre-consultation (177/215), 95% post-consultation (205/215)) (P < 0.001). Post-consultation, 96% (200/209) were satisfied with the usefulness of information, 89% (186/209) strongly agreed they had sufficient knowledge of SSEs, and 81% (167/205) agreed they would like future opportunities to meet with a breast radiologist. CONCLUSION A consultation clinic staffed by breast radiologists focused on breast density and supplemental breast cancer screening can provide personalized patient counseling, engage patients in shared decision making, assist referring clinicians, and support high quality patient-centered care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Sasha O Staack
- Mayo Clinic Arizona, Department of Radiology, Phoenix, AZ, USA
| | - Bhavika K Patel
- Mayo Clinic Arizona, Department of Radiology, Phoenix, AZ, USA
| | - Roxanne Lorans
- Mayo Clinic Arizona, Department of Radiology, Phoenix, AZ, USA
| | | | - Juliana M Kling
- Mayo Clinic Arizona, Department of Women's Health Internal Medicine, Phoenix, AZ, USA
| | - Santo Maimone
- Mayo Clinic Florida, Department of Radiology, Jacksonville, FL, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
de Ga K, Noblett D, Bateni C. Ankle MRI and preceding radiographs: an evaluation of physician ordering practices. Skeletal Radiol 2022; 51:2263-2268. [PMID: 35666294 PMCID: PMC9560948 DOI: 10.1007/s00256-022-04084-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/13/2022] [Revised: 05/25/2022] [Accepted: 05/25/2022] [Indexed: 02/02/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Multiple guidelines have been published for appropriate imaging in patients with ankle-related symptoms which suggest radiographs as the initial imaging examination for both acute and chronic ankle abnormalities. Few studies have evaluated adherence to these imaging guidelines. This study retrospectively evaluated the utilization of ankle MRI and preceding radiographs based on ordering provider group and MRI indication. MATERIALS AND METHODS A total of 4186 ankle MRIs performed over a 9-year period at a single institution were evaluated for the presence of preceding ankle and/or foot radiographs at two time points, within 3 months and within 6 months of the MRI examination. Ankle MRIs were then categorized based on 6 ordering provider groups and 13 MRI indications. RESULTS Of the 4186 MRIs evaluated, 68% had preceding radiographs within 3 months and 77% had radiographs within 6 months. Primary care, sports medicine, and podiatry had the lowest rates of preceding radiographs (73%, 68%, and 64%, respectively, within 6 months). Eighty-six percent of ankle MRIs ordered by orthopedic surgery had preceding radiographs within 6 months and 89% of ankle MRIs ordered by emergency medicine and inpatient providers had preceding radiographs. MRIs intended for evaluation of Achilles tendon or plantar fascia abnormalities were among the least likely indications to have preceding radiographs. CONCLUSION Based on established clinical guidelines, there was a lower-than-expected rate of obtaining preceding radiographs for ankle MRIs among most provider groups, particularly non-orthopedic outpatient providers. Additional research is needed to address the lack of adherence to clinical imaging guidelines and ensure appropriate imaging.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kristopher de Ga
- Department of Radiology, University of California Davis Medical Center, 4860 Y Street, Suite 3100, Sacramento, CA, 95817, USA.
| | - Dylan Noblett
- Department of Radiology, University of California Davis Medical Center, 4860 Y Street, Suite 3100, Sacramento, CA, 95817, USA
| | - Cyrus Bateni
- Department of Radiology, University of California Davis Medical Center, 4860 Y Street, Suite 3100, Sacramento, CA, 95817, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Talking Points: Enhancing Communication Between Radiologists and Patients. Acad Radiol 2022; 29:888-896. [PMID: 33846062 DOI: 10.1016/j.acra.2021.02.026] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/25/2021] [Revised: 02/15/2021] [Accepted: 02/21/2021] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
Abstract
Radiologists communicate along multiple pathways, using written, verbal, and non-verbal means. Radiology trainees must gain skills in all forms of communication, with attention to developing effective professional communication in all forms. This manuscript reviews evidence-based strategies for enhancing effective communication between radiologists and patients through direct communication, written means and enhanced reporting. We highlight patient-centered communication efforts, available evidence, and opportunities to engage learners and enhance training and simulation efforts that improve communication with patients at all levels of clinical care.
Collapse
|
6
|
Burns J, Agarwal V, Jordan SG, Dallaghan GLB, Byerley JS. Interprofessional Education - A Mandate for Today's Radiology Curriculum. Acad Radiol 2022; 29 Suppl 5:S89-S93. [PMID: 34210613 DOI: 10.1016/j.acra.2021.05.019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/22/2021] [Revised: 05/22/2021] [Accepted: 05/25/2021] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
Interprofessional education (IPE) brings educators and learners from two or more health professions together in a collaborative learning environment, specifically assuring that learners function as a team to provide patient-centered care, with each team member contributing a unique perspective. The Liaison Committee on Medical Education, the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education, and the American Board of Radiology have endorsed interprofessional and team communication as essential core competencies. Radiology educators must understand, include, and optimize IPE in their pedagogy; as a specialty, radiology must innovate more interprofessional experiences for medical students, residents and other allied health professions.
Collapse
|
7
|
Teheux L, Coolen EHAJ, Draaisma JMT, de Visser M, Scherpbier-de Haan ND, Kuijer-Siebelink W, van der Velden JAEM. Intraprofessional workplace learning in postgraduate medical education: a scoping review. BMC MEDICAL EDUCATION 2021; 21:479. [PMID: 34493263 PMCID: PMC8424991 DOI: 10.1186/s12909-021-02910-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/15/2021] [Accepted: 08/22/2021] [Indexed: 05/02/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Residents need to be trained across the boundaries of their own specialty to prepare them for collaborative practice. Intraprofessional learning (i.e. between individuals of different disciplines within the same profession) has received little attention in the postgraduate medical education literature, in contrast to the extensive literature on interprofessional learning between individuals of different professions. To address this gap, we performed a scoping review to investigate what and how residents learn from workplace-related intraprofessional activities, and what factors influence learning. METHODS The PRISMA guidelines were used to conduct a scoping review of empirical studies on intraprofessional workplace learning in postgraduate medical education published between 1 January 2000 to 16 April 2020 in Pubmed, Embase, PsycINFO, ERIC and Web of Science. This study applied 'best fit' framework-based synthesis to map the existing evidence, using the presage-process-product (3P) model developed by Tynjälä (2013). RESULTS Four thousand three hundred thirty records were screened, and 37 articles were included. This review identified influencing (presage) factors that derived from the sociocultural environment, learner and learning context. Studies described that complexity of care can both facilitate and hinder learning. Furthermore, intraprofessional learning is threatened by professional stereotyping and negative perceptions, and awareness of learning opportunities and explicit reflection are critical in intraprofessional workplace learning. Studies described a range of informal and formal intraprofessional activities (process) under the headings of collaboration in clinical practice, rotations or placements, formal educational sessions and simulated workplace training. In general, learners responded well and their attitudes and perceptions improved, learners reported increased knowledge and skills and positive behavioural changes (product). Learning outcomes were reported in the domains of patient-centred care, collaborative attitudes and respect, mutual knowledge and understanding, collaborative decision making, communication, leadership, teamwork and reflexivity. CONCLUSIONS This review gives insight into the high learning potential of intraprofessional activities. Many of the included studies relied on self-reported perceptions of change, therefore, future research should focus on generating more robust evidence including objectively examined outcome measures. This review offers a comprehensive overview of the factors that influence intraprofessional workplace learning in postgraduate medical education. Finally, we provide recommendations for enhancing intraprofessional learning in clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lara Teheux
- Department of Pediatrics, Radboudumc Amalia Children's Hospital, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
| | - Ester H A J Coolen
- Department of Pediatrics, Radboudumc Amalia Children's Hospital, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Jos M T Draaisma
- Department of Pediatrics, Radboudumc Amalia Children's Hospital, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Marieke de Visser
- Department of Research on Learning and Education, Radboudumc Health Academy, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Nynke D Scherpbier-de Haan
- Department of Primary and Community Care, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Wietske Kuijer-Siebelink
- Department of Research on Learning and Education, Radboudumc Health Academy, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
- HAN University of Applied Sciences, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Janiëlle A E M van der Velden
- Department of Pediatrics, Radboudumc Amalia Children's Hospital, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Goldman-Yassen AE, Strauss SB, Vlismas PP, Jagannath AD, Yuan M, Farinhas JM, Burns J, Bello JA. Face-to-Face: Resident-led Radiology Medicine Rounds Facilitate Evidence-based Processes for Clinical Decision Support. Curr Probl Diagn Radiol 2021; 50:580-584. [DOI: 10.1067/j.cpradiol.2020.05.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/24/2020] [Revised: 05/09/2020] [Accepted: 05/26/2020] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
|
9
|
Atallah J, Shah S, Toy D, Dodelzon K, Schweitzer AD. The importance of imaging - Perspectives from redeployment. Clin Imaging 2020; 69:380-383. [PMID: 33099069 PMCID: PMC7550887 DOI: 10.1016/j.clinimag.2020.10.022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/24/2020] [Revised: 09/24/2020] [Accepted: 10/07/2020] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
As the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic strains the healthcare system, radiology residents across the United States have become a vital part of the redeployed workforce. Through a series of four cases of COVID-19 patients encountered on the wards, we highlight the insight and unique set of skills redeployed radiology residents possess that are essential to patient care during this crisis. By increasing visibility through active participation on the clinical team, we demonstrate the fundamental role radiology has in the greater field of medicine. Radiology residents are an asset to the redeployed workforce and have meaningful contribution to patient care. Dynamic imaging rounds became critical in clinical decision-making and expediting appropriate management. Redeployment increases the visibility of radiology and highlights the essential role of the radiologist.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Juliana Atallah
- New York Presbyterian Hospital - Weill Cornell, Department of Radiology, 520 East 70(th) Street, Starr 8A-37, New York, NY 10021, United States of America.
| | - Shreena Shah
- New York Presbyterian Hospital - Weill Cornell, Department of Radiology, 520 East 70(th) Street, Starr 8A-37, New York, NY 10021, United States of America
| | - Dennis Toy
- New York Presbyterian Hospital - Weill Cornell, Department of Radiology, 520 East 70(th) Street, Starr 8A-37, New York, NY 10021, United States of America.
| | - Katerina Dodelzon
- New York Presbyterian Hospital - Weill Cornell, Department of Radiology, 520 East 70(th) Street, Starr 8A-37, New York, NY 10021, United States of America.
| | - Andrew D Schweitzer
- New York Presbyterian Hospital - Weill Cornell, Department of Radiology, 520 East 70(th) Street, Starr 8A-37, New York, NY 10021, United States of America.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Ganeshan D, Rosenkrantz AB, Bassett RL, Williams L, Lenchik L, Yang W. Burnout in Academic Radiologists in the United States. Acad Radiol 2020; 27:1274-1281. [PMID: 32037261 DOI: 10.1016/j.acra.2019.12.029] [Citation(s) in RCA: 52] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/06/2019] [Revised: 12/24/2019] [Accepted: 12/27/2019] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
Abstract
RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES To assess the prevalence and associated factors of burnout among U.S. academic radiologists. MATERIALS AND METHODS An online survey was sent to the radiologists who were full members of the Association of University Radiologists in December 2018. Burnout was measured using the abbreviated Maslach Burnout Inventory Human Services Survey. Survey respondents were also requested to complete questions on demographics, potential professional stressors, sense of calling, and career satisfaction. Associations between survey participants' characteristics and burnout were tested using logistic regression model. RESULTS The survey response rate was 27% (228/831). Twenty-nine percent met all three criteria for high burnout, including high emotional exhaustion, high depersonalization, and low personal accomplishment. Seventy-nine percent had one or more symptoms of burnout. Numerous factors including work overload, inability to balance personal and professional life, lack of autonomy, lack of appreciation from patients and other medical staff were significantly associated (p < 0.05) with high burnout. Older age (OR, 0.95; 95%CI 0.92-0.98; p < 0.05), higher number of years of experience practicing as radiologists (OR, 0.95; 95%CI 0.92-0.98; p < 0.05), and holding academic rank of professor (OR, 0.25; 95%CI 0.11-0.56; p < 0.05) were factors associated with lower odds of experiencing burnout. Radiologists with high burnout were more likely to be dissatisfied with their career (OR, 2.28; 95%CI 1.70-3.07; p < 0.0001) and less likely to identify medicine as a calling. CONCLUSION Multiple factors contribute to high burnout in academic radiologists. Familiarity with these factors may help academic radiology departments to develop strategies to promote health and wellness of their faculty.
Collapse
|
11
|
Roytman M, Shah S. Lessons learned during the COVID-19 pandemic: a single institution radiology chief resident experience. Clin Imaging 2020; 68:90-93. [PMID: 32580107 PMCID: PMC7301115 DOI: 10.1016/j.clinimag.2020.06.030] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/15/2020] [Revised: 06/05/2020] [Accepted: 06/09/2020] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
Abstract
Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) has posed incredible new challenges for radiology residency programs, including resident training under tenuous and uncertain conditions, barriers to communication, deployment-induced anxiety, and social isolation. Chief residents and program leadership play a critical role in guiding radiology residents through these unprecedented times. Best practices and creative approaches experienced in a single institution's residency program located in New York City are shared in an effort to encourage other programs struggling with similar obstacles to prioritize resident education and wellness. COVID-19 has posed incredible challenges for radiology residency programs. Lessons learned by radiology chief residents from a NYC institution are shared. The importance of communication, preparation, leadership, education and wellness in a radiology residency are discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michelle Roytman
- Departments of Radiology, Weill Cornell Medicine/NewYork-Presbyterian Hospital, United States of America.
| | - Shreena Shah
- Departments of Radiology, Weill Cornell Medicine/NewYork-Presbyterian Hospital, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
|
13
|
Klobuka AJ, Lee J, Buranosky R, Heller M. When the Reading Room Meets the Team Room: Resident Perspectives From Radiology and Internal Medicine on the Effect of Personal Communication After Implementing a Resident-Led Radiology Rounds. Curr Probl Diagn Radiol 2018; 48:312-322. [PMID: 29628404 DOI: 10.1067/j.cpradiol.2018.02.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/02/2017] [Revised: 02/07/2018] [Accepted: 02/08/2018] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Current radiology and internal medicine (IM) residents have trained to varying degrees depending on program in the post picture archiving and communication systems implementation era and thus have largely missed out on the benefits of in-person, 2-way communication between radiologists and consulting clinicians. The purpose of this study is to broadly explore resident perspectives from these groups on the desire for personal contact between radiologists and referring physicians and the effect of improved contact on clinical practice. MATERIALS AND METHODS A radiology rounds was implemented in which radiology residents travel to the IM teaching service teams to discuss their inpatients and review ordered imaging biweekly. Surveys were given to both cohorts following 9 months of implementation. RESULTS A total of 23/49 diagnostic radiology (DR) and 72/197 IM residents responded. In all, 83% of DR and 96% of IM residents desired more personal contact between radiologists and clinicians. Of all, 92% of DR residents agree that contact with referring clinicians changes their approach to a study, 96% of IM residents agree that personal contact with a radiologist has changed patient management in a way that they otherwise would not have done having simply read a report, 85% of DR residents report that more clinician contact will improve resource use, and 96% report that it will improve care quality. Furthermore, 99% of IM residents report that increased access to a radiologist would make selecting the most appropriate imaging study easier in various clinical scenarios. A majority of IM residents prefer radiology reports that provide specific next-step recommendations and that include arrows/key-image series. CONCLUSION We conclude that the newest generation of physicians is already attuned to the value of a radiologist who plays an active, in-person role in the clinical decision-making process.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrew J Klobuka
- Department of Radiology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA.
| | - John Lee
- Drexel University College of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA
| | - Raquel Buranosky
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA
| | - Matthew Heller
- Department of Radiology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA
| |
Collapse
|