Accuracy of Opposed-phase Magnetic Resonance Imaging for the Evaluation of Treated and Untreated Spinal Metastases

Utility of absolute apparent diffusion coefficient and chemical-shift imaging versus CT attenuation for predicting malignancy from percutaneous bone biopsies

INTRODUCTION

Bone lesions are sometimes detected on computed tomography studies, and biopsies are performed to evaluate whether these are malignant. The aim of the study is to evaluate whether chemical-shift imaging (CSI) and diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) are more informative than the CT attenuation for predicting malignancy.

METHODS

Retrospective analysis of 86 patients who underwent both diagnostic CT, CSI MRI and DWI MRI within 6 weeks prior to bone biopsy at a tertiary care academic institution between 01/01/2010 and 03/01/2020. The CT attenuation, signal intensity on in-phase sequences (SIIP), signal intensity on out-of-phase sequences (SIOP), signal intensity ratio (SIR = SIOP/SIIP) and the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) of the lesions over the region of the biopsy tract were measured.

RESULTS

A threshold CT attenuation of 157 Hounsfield Units (HU) had a sensitivity of 47.7%, specificity of 83.3% and area under the curve (AUC) of 0.59. A threshold ADC of 793 × 10-6 mm2 /s had a sensitivity of 75.8%, specificity of 85.7% and AUC of 0.83 to predict whether a bone biopsy would detect malignancy. A threshold SIR of 0.949 had a sensitivity of 77.8%, specificity of 77.8% and AUC of 0.81 to predict whether a bone biopsy would detect malignancy. ADC (P = 0.029) and SIR (P = 0.009) were significantly better than CT attenuation. There was no predictive difference between SIR and ADC (P = 0.742).

CONCLUSIONS

The CT attenuation of a lesion is a poor predictor of malignancy in bone lesions. CSI and DWI are significantly better for predicting malignancy.

The utility of 2-[18F]FDG-PET/CT maximum SUV versus CT attenuation for directing bone biopsies

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to compare the accuracy of PET/CT parameters with CT parameters for directing bone biopsies.

METHODS

The study was an IRB-approved retrospective study of 388 patients who underwent both 2-[¹⁸F] FDG PET/CT and CT within 6 weeks before a bone biopsy. Age, sex, cancer type, lesion length, SUV_max, tumor to liver (T/L) ratio, CT attenuation, difference in CT attenuation between the lesion and normal bone (delta CT attenuation), and the absolute delta CT attenuation were used as predictors. T tests and chi-squared tests were used to compare variables. DeLong's test was used to compare receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curves.

RESULTS

We reviewed the data from 388 patients. Of these, 295 patients had bone lesion biopsies, and 93 patients had bone marrow aspirations/biopsies. Biopsies of larger bone lesions (p = 0.033) and bone lesions with higher SUV_max (p = 0.005) were more likely to show malignancy. For bone lesions, the ROC curve for the SUV_max (AUC = 0.6827) was better than the ROC curves for delta CT attenuation (AUC = 0.5766, p = 0.032) and absolute delta CT attenuation (AUC = 0.5491, p = 0.006), but not significantly better than the ROC curves for CT attenuation (AUC = 0.5894, p = 0.061) and T/L ratio (AUC = 0.6778, p = 0.774). A threshold SUV_max of 5.25 had an accuracy of 0.713, sensitivity of 0.766, and specificity of 0.549 to predict malignancy in bone lesion biopsies. None of these variables predicted malignancy in bone marrow biopsies (p > 0.05 for all).

CONCLUSIONS

Metabolic 2-[¹⁸F]FDG PET/CT parameters have more clinical impact for planning bone biopsies as compared to CT parameters.

KEY POINTS

• The 2-[¹⁸F]FDG PET/CT measurement (SUVmax) has more clinical impact for planning bone biopsies as compared to CT measurements. • Neither the change in CT attenuation of the lesion relative to normal bone nor the absolute value of this change was a significant predictor of malignancy. • 2-[¹⁸F]FDG PET/CT may have clinical benefit and an additional role in directing bone biopsies.

Positron emission tomography/computed tomography imaging appearance of benign and classic “do not touch” osseous lesions

BACKGROUND

Classic “do not touch” and benign osseous lesions are sometimes detected on ¹⁸-F-fluorodeoxyglucose (¹⁸F-FDG) positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) studies. These lesions are often referred for biopsy because the physician interpreting the PET/CT may not be familiar with the spectrum of ¹⁸F-FDG uptake patterns that these lesions display.

AIM

To show that “do not touch” and benign osseous lesions can have increased ¹⁸F-FDG uptake above blood-pool on PET/CT; therefore, the CT appearance of these lesions should dictate management rather than the standardized uptake values (SUV).

METHODS

This retrospective study evaluated 287 independent patients with 287 classic “do not touch” (benign cystic lesions, insufficiency fractures, bone islands, bone infarcts) or benign osseous lesions (hemangiomas, enchondromas, osteochondromas, fibrous dysplasia, Paget’s disease, osteomyelitis) who underwent ¹⁸F-FDG positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) at a tertiary academic healthcare institution between 01/01/2006 and 12/1/2018. The maximum and mean SUV, and the ratio of the maximum SUV to mean blood pool were calculated. Pearson’s correlations between lesion size and maximum SUV were calculated.

RESULTS

The ranges of the maximum SUV were as follows: For hemangiomas (0.95-2.99), bone infarcts (0.37-3.44), bone islands (0.26-3.29), enchondromas (0.46-2.69), fibrous dysplasia (0.78-18.63), osteochondromas (1.11-2.56), Paget’s disease of bone (0.93-5.65), insufficiency fractures (1.06-12.97) and for osteomyelitis (2.57-12.64). The range of the maximum SUV was lowest for osteochondromas (maximum SUV 2.56) and was highest for fibrous dysplasia (maximum SUV of 18.63). There was at least one lesion that demonstrated greater ¹⁸F-FDG avidity than the blood pool amongst each lesion type, with the highest maximum SUV ranging from 9.34 times blood pool mean (osteomyelitis) to 1.42 times blood pool mean (hemangiomas). There was no correlation between the maximum SUV and the lesion size except for enchondromas. Larger enchondromas had higher maximum SUV (r = 0.36, P = 0.02).

CONCLUSION

The classic “do not touch” lesions and classic benign lesions can be ¹⁸F-FDG avid. The CT appearance of these lesions should dictate clinical management rather than the maximum SUV.

Neuroimaging and Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy (SBRT) for Spine Metastasis

Historically, management options for spinal metastases include surgery for stabilization and decompression and/or external beam radiation therapy (EBRT). EBRT is palliative in nature, as it lacks accurate targeting such that the prescribed radiation doses must be limited in order to maintain safety. Modern advancement in imaging and radiotherapy technology have facilitated the development of stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT), which provides increased targeted precision for radiation delivery to tumors resulting in lower overall toxicity, particularly to regional structures such as the spinal cord and esophagus, while delivering higher, more effective, and radically ablative radiation doses.Over the past decade, SBRT has been increasingly utilized as a method of treating spinal metastases either as the primary modality or following surgical intervention in both de novo and reirradiation setting. Numerous studies suggest that SBRT is associated with an 80% to 90% rate of 1-year local control across clinical scenarios. For example, studies of SBRT as the primary treatment modality suggest long-term local control rate of 80% to 95% for spinal metastases. Similarly, SBRT in the adjuvant setting following surgery is associated with local control rates ranging from 70% to 100%. Furthermore, because SBRT allows for lower dose to the spinal cord, it has also been used in patients who have had prior radiation therapy, with studies showing 66% to 93% local control in this scenario.