Pulmonary MRI Radiomics and Machine Learning: Effect of Intralesional Heterogeneity on Classification of Lesion

MRI-Based Clinical-Imaging-Radiomics Nomogram Model for Discriminating Between Benign and Malignant Solid Pulmonary Nodules or Masses

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES

Pulmonary nodules or masses are highly prevalent worldwide, and differential diagnosis of benign and malignant lesions remains difficult. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) can provide functional and metabolic information of pulmonary lesions. This study aimed to establish a nomogram model based on clinical features, imaging features, and multi-sequence MRI radiomics to identify benign and malignant solid pulmonary nodules or masses.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 145 eligible patients (76 male; mean age, 58.4 years ± 13.7 [SD]) with solid pulmonary nodules or masses were retrospectively analyzed. The patients were randomized into two groups (training cohort, n = 102; validation cohort, n = 43). The nomogram was used for predicting malignant pulmonary lesions. The diagnostic performance of different models was evaluated by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis.

RESULTS

Of these patients, 95 patients were diagnosed with benign lesions and 50 with malignant lesions. Multivariate analysis showed that age, DWI value, LSR value, and ADC value were independent predictors of malignant lesions. Among the radiomics models, the multi-sequence MRI-based model (T1WI+T2WI+ADC) achieved the best diagnosis performance with AUCs of 0.858 (95%CI: 0.775, 0.919) and 0.774 (95%CI: 0.621, 0.887) for the training and validation cohorts, respectively. Combining multi-sequence radiomics, clinical and imaging features, the predictive efficacy of the clinical-imaging-radiomics model was significantly better than the clinical model, imaging model and radiomics model (all P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

The MRI-based clinical-imaging-radiomics model is helpful to differentiate benign and malignant solid pulmonary nodules or masses, and may be useful for precision medicine of pulmonary diseases.

Machine learning-based radiomics for histological classification of parotid tumors using morphological MRI: a comparative study

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the effectiveness of machine learning models based on morphological magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) radiomics in the classification of parotid tumors.

METHODS

In total, 298 patients with parotid tumors were randomly assigned to a training and test set at a ratio of 7:3. Radiomics features were extracted from the morphological MRI images and screened using the Select K Best and LASSO algorithm. Three-step machine learning models with XGBoost, SVM, and DT algorithms were developed to classify the parotid neoplasms into four subtypes. The ROC curve was used to measure the performance in each step. Diagnostic confusion matrices of these models were calculated for the test cohort and compared with those of the radiologists.

RESULTS

Six, twelve, and eight optimal features were selected in each step of the three-step process, respectively. XGBoost produced the highest area under the curve (AUC) for all three steps in the training cohort (0.857, 0.882, and 0.908, respectively), and for the first step in the test cohort (0.826), but produced slightly lower AUCs than SVM in the latter two steps in the test cohort (0.817 vs. 0.833, and 0.789 vs. 0.821, respectively). The total accuracies of XGBoost and SVM in the confusion matrices (70.8% and 59.6%) outperformed those of DT and the radiologist (46.1% and 49.2%).

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrated that machine learning models based on morphological MRI radiomics might be an assistive tool for parotid tumor classification, especially for preliminary screening in absence of more advanced scanning sequences, such as DWI.

KEY POINTS

• Machine learning algorithms combined with morphological MRI radiomics could be useful in the preliminary classification of parotid tumors. • XGBoost algorithm performed better than SVM and DT in subtype differentiation of parotid tumors, while DT seemed to have a poor validation performance. • Using morphological MRI only, the XGBoost and SVM algorithms outperformed radiologists in the four-type classification task for parotid tumors, thus making these models a useful assistant diagnostic tool in clinical practice.