Impact of a Deep Learning-based Super-resolution Image Reconstruction Technique on High-contrast Computed Tomography: A Phantom Study

Super-resolution deep-learning reconstruction for cardiac CT: impact of radiation dose and focal spot size on task-based image quality

This study aimed to evaluate the impact of radiation dose and focal spot size on the image quality of super-resolution deep-learning reconstruction (SR-DLR) in comparison with iterative reconstruction (IR) and normal-resolution DLR (NR-DLR) algorithms for cardiac CT. Catphan-700 phantom was scanned on a 320-row scanner at six radiation doses (small and large focal spots at 1.4-4.3 and 5.8-8.8 mGy, respectively). Images were reconstructed using hybrid-IR, model-based-IR, NR-DLR, and SR-DLR algorithms. Noise properties were evaluated through plotting noise power spectrum (NPS). Spatial resolution was quantified with task-based transfer function (TTF); Polystyrene, Delrin, and Bone-50% inserts were used for low-, intermediate, and high-contrast spatial resolution. The detectability index (d') was calculated. Image noise, noise texture, edge sharpness of low- and intermediate-contrast objects, delineation of fine high-contrast objects, and overall quality of four reconstructions were visually ranked. Results indicated that among four reconstructions, SR-DLR yielded the lowest noise magnitude and NPS peak, as well as the highest average NPS frequency, TTF50%, d' values, and visual rank at each radiation dose. For all reconstructions, the intermediate- to high-contrast spatial resolution was maximized at 4.3 mGy, while the lowest noise magnitude and highest d' were attained at 8.8 mGy. SR-DLR at 4.3 mGy exhibited superior noise performance, intermediate- to high-contrast spatial resolution, d' values, and visual rank compared to the other reconstructions at 8.8 mGy. Therefore, SR-DLR may yield superior diagnostic image quality and facilitate radiation dose reduction compared to the other reconstructions, particularly when combined with small focal spot scanning.

Improved stent sharpness evaluation with super-resolution deep learning reconstruction in coronary CT angiography

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to assess the impact of super-resolution deep learning reconstruction (SR-DLR) on coronary CT angiography (CCTA) image quality and blooming artifacts from coronary artery stents in comparison to conventional methods, including hybrid iterative reconstruction (HIR) and deep learning-based reconstruction (DLR).

METHODS

A retrospective analysis included 66 CCTA patients from July to November 2022. Major coronary arteries were evaluated for image noise, signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR). Stent sharpness was quantified using 10%-90% edge rise slope (ERS) and 10%-90% edge rise distance (ERD). Qualitative analysis employed a 5-point scoring system to assess overall image quality, image noise, vessel wall, and stent structure.

RESULTS

SR-DLR demonstrated significantly lower image noise compared to HIR and DLR. SNR and CNR were notably higher in SR-DLR. Stent ERS was significantly improved in SR-DLR, with mean ERD values of 0.70 ± 0.20 mm for SR-DLR, 1.13 ± 0.28 mm for HIR, and 0.85 ± 0.26 mm for DLR. Qualitatively, SR-DLR scored higher in all categories.

CONCLUSIONS

SR-DLR produces images with lower image noise, leading to improved overall image quality, compared with HIR and DLR. SR-DLR is a valuable image reconstruction algorithm for enhancing the spatial resolution and sharpness of coronary artery stents without being constrained by hardware limitations.

ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE

The overall image quality was significantly higher in SR-DLR, resulting in sharper coronary artery stents compared to HIR and DLR.

Super resolution deep learning reconstruction for coronary CT angiography: A structured phantom study

Purpose

Super-resolution deep-learning-based reconstruction: SR-DLR is a newly developed and clinically available deep-learning-based image reconstruction method that can improve the spatial resolution of CT images. The image quality of the output from non-linear image reconstructions, such as DLR, is known to vary depending on the structure of the object being scanned, and a simple phantom cannot explicitly evaluate the clinical performance of SR-DLR. This study aims to accurately investigate the quality of the images reconstructed by SR-DLR by utilizing a structured phantom that simulates the human anatomy in coronary CT angiography.

Methods

The structural phantom had ribs and vertebrae made of plaster, a left ventricle filled with dilute contrast medium, a coronary artery with simulated stenosis, and an implanted stent graft. By scanning the structured phantom, we evaluated noise and spatial resolution on the images reconstructed with SR-DLR and conventional reconstructions.

Results

The spatial resolution of SR-DLR was higher than conventional reconstructions; the 10 % modulation transfer function of hybrid IR (HIR), DLR, and SR-DLR were 0.792-, 0.976-, and 1.379 cycle/mm, respectively. At the same time, image noise was lowest (HIR: 21.1-, DLR: 19.0-, and SR-DLR: 13.1 HU). SR-DLR could accurately assess coronary artery stenosis and the lumen of the implanted stent graft.

Conclusions

SR-DLR can obtain CT images with high spatial resolution and lower noise without special CT equipments, and will help diagnose coronary artery disease in CCTA and other CT examinations that require high spatial resolution.

Ultra-high-resolution CT of the temporal bone: Comparison between deep learning reconstruction and hybrid and model-based iterative reconstruction

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the ability of ultra-high-resolution computed tomography (UHR-CT) to assess stapes and chorda tympani nerve anatomy using a deep learning (DLR), a model-based, and a hybrid iterative reconstruction algorithm compared to simulated conventional CT.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

CT acquisitions were performed with a Mercury 4.0 phantom. Images were acquired with a 1024 × 1024 matrix and a 0.25 mm slice thickness and reconstructed using DLR, model-based, and hybrid iterative reconstruction algorithms. To simulate conventional CT, images were also reconstructed with a 512 × 512 matrix and a 0.5 mm slice thickness. Spatial resolution, noise power spectrum, and objective high-contrast detectability were compared. Three radiologists evaluated the clinical acceptability of these algorithms by assessing the thickness and image quality of the stapes footplate and superstructure elements, as well as the image quality of the chorda tympani nerve bony and tympanic segments using a 5-point confidence scale on 13 temporal bone CT examinations reconstructed with the four algorithms.

RESULTS

UHR-CT provided higher spatial resolution than simulated conventional CT at the penalty of higher noise. DLR and model-based iterative reconstruction provided better noise reduction than hybrid iterative reconstruction, and DLR had the highest detectability index, regardless of the dose level. All stapedial structure thicknesses were thinner using UHR-CT by comparison with conventional simulated CT (P < 0.009). DLR showed the best visualization scores compared to the other reconstruction algorithms (P < 0.032).

CONCLUSION

UHR-CT with DLR results in less noise than UHR-CT with hybrid iterative reconstruction and significantly improves stapes and tympanic chorda tympani nerve depiction compared to simulated conventional CT and UHR-CT with iterative reconstruction.

Comparison of two deep-learning image reconstruction algorithms on cardiac CT images: A phantom study

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to compare the performance of Precise IQ Engine (PIQE) and Advanced intelligent Clear-IQ Engine (AiCE) algorithms on image-quality according to the dose level in a cardiac computed tomography (CT) protocol.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Acquisitions were performed using the CT ACR 464 phantom at three dose levels (volume CT dose indexes: 7.1/5.2/3.1 mGy) using a prospective cardiac CT protocol. Raw data were reconstructed using the three levels of AiCE and PIQE (Mild, Standard and Strong). The noise power spectrum (NPS) and task-based transfer function (TTF) for bone and acrylic inserts were computed. The detectability index (d') was computed to model the detectability of the coronary lumen (350 Hounsfield units and 4-mm diameter) and non-calcified plaque (40 Hounsfield units and 2-mm diameter).

RESULTS

Noise magnitude values were lower with PIQE than with AiCE (-13.4 ± 6.0 [standard deviation (SD)] % for Mild, -20.4 ± 4.0 [SD] % for Standard and -32.6 ± 2.6 [SD] % for Strong levels). The average NPS spatial frequencies shifted towards higher frequencies with PIQE than with AiCE (21.9 ± 3.5 [SD] % for Mild, 20.1 ± 3.0 [SD] % for Standard and 12.5 ± 3.5 [SD] % for Strong levels). The TTF values at fifty percent (f50) values shifted towards higher frequencies with PIQE than with AiCE for acrylic inserts but, for bone inserts, f50 values were found to be close. Whatever the dose and DLR level, d' values of both simulated cardiac lesions were higher with PIQE than with AiCE. For the simulated coronary lumen, d' values were better by 35.1 ± 9.3 (SD) % on average for all dose levels for Mild, 43.2 ± 5.0 (SD) % for Standard, and 62.6 ± 1.2 (SD) % for Strong levels.

CONCLUSION

Compared to AiCE, PIQE reduced noise, improved spatial resolution, noise texture and detectability of simulated cardiac lesions. PIQE seems to have a greater potential for dose reduction in cardiac CT acquisition.

Super-resolution deep learning reconstruction at coronary computed tomography angiography to evaluate the coronary arteries and in-stent lumen: an initial experience

A super-resolution deep learning reconstruction (SR-DLR) algorithm trained using data acquired on the ultrahigh spatial resolution computed tomography (UHRCT) has the potential to provide better image quality of coronary arteries on the whole-heart, single-rotation cardiac coverage on a 320-detector row CT scanner. However, the advantages of SR-DLR at coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) have not been fully investigated. The present study aimed to compare the image quality of the coronary arteries and in-stent lumen between SR-DLR and model-based iterative reconstruction (MBIR). We prospectively enrolled 70 patients (median age, 69 years; interquartile range [IQR], 59-75 years; 50 men) who underwent CCTA using a 320-detector row CT scanner between January and August 2022. The image noise in the ascending aorta, left atrium, and septal wall of the ventricle was measured, and the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) in the proximal coronary arteries were calculated. Of the twenty stents, stent strut thickness and luminal diameter were quantitatively evaluated. The image noise on SR-DLR was significantly lower than that on MBIR (median 22.1 HU; IQR, 19.3-24.9 HU vs. 27.4 HU; IQR, 24.2-31.2 HU, p < 0.01), whereas the SNR (median 16.3; IQR, 11.8-21.8 vs. 13.7; IQR, 9.9-18.4, p = 0.01) and CNR (median 24.4; IQR, 15.5-30.2 vs. 19.2; IQR, 14.1-23.2, p < 0.01) on SR-DLR were significantly higher than that on MBIR. Stent struts were significantly thinner (median, 0.68 mm; IQR, 0.61-0.78 mm vs. 0.81 mm; IQR, 0.72-0.96 mm, p < 0.01) and in-stent lumens were significantly larger (median, 1.84 mm; IQR, 1.65-2.26 mm vs. 1.52 mm; IQR, 1.28-2.25 mm, p < 0.01) on SR-DLR than on MBIR. Although further large-scale studies using invasive coronary angiography as the reference standard, comparative studies with UHRCT, and studies in more challenging population for CCTA are needed, this study's initial experience with SR-DLR would improve the utility of CCTA in daily clinical practice due to the better image quality of the coronary arteries and in-stent lumen at CCTA compared with conventional MBIR.