Greffier J, Pastor M, Si-Mohamed S, Goutain-Majorel C, Peudon-Balas A, Bensalah MZ, Frandon J, Beregi JP, Dabli D. Comparison of two deep-learning image reconstruction algorithms on cardiac CT images: A phantom study.
Diagn Interv Imaging 2024;
105:110-117. [PMID:
37949769 DOI:
10.1016/j.diii.2023.10.004]
[Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/06/2023] [Revised: 10/16/2023] [Accepted: 10/17/2023] [Indexed: 11/12/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE
The purpose of this study was to compare the performance of Precise IQ Engine (PIQE) and Advanced intelligent Clear-IQ Engine (AiCE) algorithms on image-quality according to the dose level in a cardiac computed tomography (CT) protocol.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Acquisitions were performed using the CT ACR 464 phantom at three dose levels (volume CT dose indexes: 7.1/5.2/3.1 mGy) using a prospective cardiac CT protocol. Raw data were reconstructed using the three levels of AiCE and PIQE (Mild, Standard and Strong). The noise power spectrum (NPS) and task-based transfer function (TTF) for bone and acrylic inserts were computed. The detectability index (d') was computed to model the detectability of the coronary lumen (350 Hounsfield units and 4-mm diameter) and non-calcified plaque (40 Hounsfield units and 2-mm diameter).
RESULTS
Noise magnitude values were lower with PIQE than with AiCE (-13.4 ± 6.0 [standard deviation (SD)] % for Mild, -20.4 ± 4.0 [SD] % for Standard and -32.6 ± 2.6 [SD] % for Strong levels). The average NPS spatial frequencies shifted towards higher frequencies with PIQE than with AiCE (21.9 ± 3.5 [SD] % for Mild, 20.1 ± 3.0 [SD] % for Standard and 12.5 ± 3.5 [SD] % for Strong levels). The TTF values at fifty percent (f50) values shifted towards higher frequencies with PIQE than with AiCE for acrylic inserts but, for bone inserts, f50 values were found to be close. Whatever the dose and DLR level, d' values of both simulated cardiac lesions were higher with PIQE than with AiCE. For the simulated coronary lumen, d' values were better by 35.1 ± 9.3 (SD) % on average for all dose levels for Mild, 43.2 ± 5.0 (SD) % for Standard, and 62.6 ± 1.2 (SD) % for Strong levels.
CONCLUSION
Compared to AiCE, PIQE reduced noise, improved spatial resolution, noise texture and detectability of simulated cardiac lesions. PIQE seems to have a greater potential for dose reduction in cardiac CT acquisition.
Collapse