Results of the 2021-2022 Survey of the American Alliance of Academic Chief Residents in Radiology

Factors for which radiology residents choose fellowship

PURPOSE

The objective of this study is to assess factors that influence radiology residents' decision to pursue fellowship. Historically a large majority of Diagnostic Radiology (DR) residents have pursued fellowship, but with changes in the job market and the Covid-19 pandemic, this study analyzes the current trends associated with radiology fellowship choice.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

An anonymous 28-question survey was constructed based on literature review and pilot feedback from university radiology residents. The survey was distributed through APDR and to all program coordinators to be distributed to residents. Demographic information and questions related to fellowship choice were assessed. The survey was conducted through RedCap and consisted of multiple choice and sliding scale questions.

RESULTS

214 radiology residents responded, representing 4.6 % of US DR residents across 199 programs. The top fellowship choices included neuroradiology (20.5 %), musculoskeletal imaging (17.3 %), body imaging (16.8 %), and breast imaging (16.4 %). Most influential factors for fellowship selection were strong personal interest, enjoyable rotation, work hours, job security, and compensation. Least influential factors were research opportunities and specific group practice.

CONCLUSION

The decision to pursue fellowship remains almost unanimous among US DR residents. Strong personal interest, enjoyable rotations, and favorable work hours were rated as the most important factors in the decision to pursue fellowship. Neuroradiology, musculoskeletal, and body imaging remained the most popular specialties, with a notable increase in interest in breast radiology compared to literature. To attract prospective fellows, residency and fellowship programs should emphasize aforementioned factors and offer more early exposure to subspecialties during residency.

Five Years of the Musculoskeletal Radiology Fellowship Match: Trends and Perspectives

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES

The 2023 Match marks 5 years since the Musculoskeletal (MSK) Radiology Fellowship Match first took place in June 2019. The objective of this study is to analyze trends in the MSK Match over its 5-year course.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Data from the National Resident Matching Program were evaluated for the number of applicants, medical school type of matched applicants, number of programs, and number of positions. Programs were grouped according to geographic region, program size, and ACGME accreditation status. These data were plotted to look for trends over time and by program characteristics.

RESULTS

There has been little variation in the number of eligible programs registering for the Match (range 80-83). The number of available positions has had a wider variation (range 204-218), and the number of applicants preferring MSK has varied from 156 to 178. The gap between positions and applicants has resulted in a percentage of positions filled that has ranged from 70.9% to 82.4%. Program size is positively correlated with Match rates, with 100% of programs with five or more positions filling ≥ 50% in 4 out of 5 years.

CONCLUSION

The variable numbers of fellowship positions and applicants have resulted in variable success of the Match by all metrics. Maintaining or increasing the number of applicants is the most critical factor for ongoing Match success.

Training the New Radiologists: Approaches for Education

The field of Radiology is continually changing, requiring corresponding evolution in both medical student and resident training to adequately prepare the next generation of radiologists. With advancements in adult education theory and a deeper understanding of perception in imaging interpretation, expert educators are reshaping the training landscape by introducing innovative teaching methods to align with increased workload demands and emerging technologies. These include the use of peer and interdisciplinary teaching, gamification, case repositories, flipped-classroom models, social media, and drawing and comics. This publication aims to investigate these novel approaches and offer persuasive evidence supporting their incorporation into the updated Radiology curriculum.