Factors for which radiology residents choose fellowship

PURPOSE

The objective of this study is to assess factors that influence radiology residents' decision to pursue fellowship. Historically a large majority of Diagnostic Radiology (DR) residents have pursued fellowship, but with changes in the job market and the Covid-19 pandemic, this study analyzes the current trends associated with radiology fellowship choice.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

An anonymous 28-question survey was constructed based on literature review and pilot feedback from university radiology residents. The survey was distributed through APDR and to all program coordinators to be distributed to residents. Demographic information and questions related to fellowship choice were assessed. The survey was conducted through RedCap and consisted of multiple choice and sliding scale questions.

RESULTS

214 radiology residents responded, representing 4.6 % of US DR residents across 199 programs. The top fellowship choices included neuroradiology (20.5 %), musculoskeletal imaging (17.3 %), body imaging (16.8 %), and breast imaging (16.4 %). Most influential factors for fellowship selection were strong personal interest, enjoyable rotation, work hours, job security, and compensation. Least influential factors were research opportunities and specific group practice.

CONCLUSION

The decision to pursue fellowship remains almost unanimous among US DR residents. Strong personal interest, enjoyable rotations, and favorable work hours were rated as the most important factors in the decision to pursue fellowship. Neuroradiology, musculoskeletal, and body imaging remained the most popular specialties, with a notable increase in interest in breast radiology compared to literature. To attract prospective fellows, residency and fellowship programs should emphasize aforementioned factors and offer more early exposure to subspecialties during residency.

Establishing a pediatric interventional radiology inpatient consult service

OBJECTIVE

To delineate pediatric interventional radiology (IR) inpatient consult growth and resulting collections after implementation of a pediatric IR consult service.

METHODS

An inpatient IR consult process was created at a single academic children's hospital in October 2019. IR consult note templates were created in Epic (Epic Systems Corporation, Verona, Wisconsin) and utilized by 4 IR physicians. Automatic charge generation was linked to differing levels of evaluation and management (E&M) service relating to current procedural terminology (CPT) inpatient consult codes 99251-99255. The children's hospital informatics division identified IR consult notes entered from the implementation of the consult service: October 2019 to January 2022. The university radiology department billing office provided IR service E&M charge, payment, and relative value units (RVU) information during this study period. A chart review was performed to determine the IR procedure conversion rate. Mann-Whitney and a two-sample t-test statistical analyses compared use of the 25-modifier, monthly consult growth and monthly payment growth. P-value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.  RESULTS: Within this 27-month period, a total of 2153 inpatient IR consults were performed during 1757 Epic hospital encounters; monthly consult peak was reached 5 months into the study period. Consult level breakdown by CPT codes: 99251-8.7%, 99252-81.7%, and 99253-8.8%. 69.7% of IR consults had consult-specific billing with payments in 96.4% resulting in $143,976 new revenue. From 2020 to 2021, IR consult volume trended upward by 13.4% (P =0.069), and consult-specific payments increased by 84.1% (P<0.001). IR consult procedure conversion rate was 96.5%.

CONCLUSION

An inpatient pediatric IR consult service was quickly established and maintained by four physicians over a 27-month study period. Annual IR consult volume trended upward and consult-specific payments increased, resulting in previously uncaptured IR service revenue.