Extracellular vesicles derived from starving BMSCs enhance survival of chondrocyte aggregates in grafts by attenuating chondrocyte apoptosis and enabling stable cartilage regeneration for craniofacial reconstruction

Autophagy, a double-edged sword for oral tissue regeneration

BACKGROUND

Oral health is of fundamental importance to maintain systemic health in humans. Stem cell-based oral tissue regeneration is a promising strategy to achieve the recovery of impaired oral tissue. As a highly conserved process of lysosomal degradation, autophagy induction regulates stem cell function physiologically and pathologically. Autophagy activation can serve as a cytoprotective mechanism in stressful environments, while insufficient or over-activation may also lead to cell function dysregulation and cell death.

AIM OF REVIEW

This review focuses on the effects of autophagy on stem cell function and oral tissue regeneration, with particular emphasis on diverse roles of autophagy in different oral tissues, including periodontal tissue, bone tissue, dentin pulp tissue, oral mucosa, salivary gland, maxillofacial muscle, temporomandibular joint, etc. Additionally, this review introduces the molecular mechanisms involved in autophagy during the regeneration of different parts of oral tissue, and how autophagy can be regulated by small molecule drugs, biomaterials, exosomes/RNAs or other specific treatments. Finally, this review discusses new perspectives for autophagy manipulation and oral tissue regeneration.

KEY SCIENTIFIC CONCEPTS OF REVIEW

Overall, this review emphasizes the contribution of autophagy to oral tissue regeneration and highlights the possible approaches for regulating autophagy to promote the regeneration of human oral tissue.

Mesenchymal stem cells in craniofacial reconstruction: a comprehensive review

Craniofacial reconstruction faces many challenges, including high complexity, strong specificity, severe injury, irregular and complex wounds, and high risk of bleeding. Traditionally, the "gold standard" for treating craniofacial bone defects has been tissue transplantation, which involves the transplantation of bone, cartilage, skin, and other tissues from other parts of the body. However, the shape of craniofacial bone and cartilage structures varies greatly and is distinctly different from ordinary long bones. Craniofacial bones originate from the neural crest, while long bones originate from the mesoderm. These factors contribute to the poor effectiveness of tissue transplantation in repairing craniofacial defects. Autologous mesenchymal stem cell transplantation exhibits excellent pluripotency, low immunogenicity, and minimally invasive properties, and is considered a potential alternative to tissue transplantation for treating craniofacial defects. Researchers have found that both craniofacial-specific mesenchymal stem cells and mesenchymal stem cells from other parts of the body have significant effects on the restoration and reconstruction of craniofacial bones, cartilage, wounds, and adipose tissue. In addition, the continuous development and application of tissue engineering technology provide new ideas for craniofacial repair. With the continuous exploration of mesenchymal stem cells by researchers and the continuous development of tissue engineering technology, the use of autologous mesenchymal stem cell transplantation for craniofacial reconstruction has gradually been accepted and promoted. This article will review the applications of various types of mesenchymal stem cells and related tissue engineering in craniofacial repair and reconstruction.

Specific lipid magnetic sphere sorted CD146-positive bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells can better promote articular cartilage damage repair

BACKGROUND

The characteristics and therapeutic potential of subtypes of bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells (BMSCs) are largely unknown. Also, the application of subpopulations of BMSCs in cartilage regeneration remains poorly characterized. The aim of this study was to explore the regenerative capacity of CD146-positive subpopulations of BMSCs for repairing cartilage defects.

METHODS

CD146-positive BMSCs (CD146 + BMSCs) were sorted by self-developed CD146-specific lipid magnetic spheres (CD146-LMS). Cell surface markers, viability, and proliferation were evaluated in vitro. CD146 + BMSCs were subjected to in vitro chondrogenic induction and evaluated for chondrogenic properties by detecting mRNA and protein expression. The role of the CD146 subpopulation of BMSCs in cartilage damage repair was assessed by injecting CD146 + BMSCs complexed with sodium alginate gel in the joints of a mouse cartilage defect model.

RESULTS

The prepared CD146-LMS had an average particle size of 193.7 ± 5.24 nm, an average potential of 41.9 ± 6.21 mv, and a saturation magnetization intensity of 27.2 Am2/kg, which showed good stability and low cytotoxicity. The sorted CD146 + BMSCs highly expressed stem cell and pericyte markers with good cellular activity and cellular value-added capacity. Cartilage markers Sox9, Collagen II, and Aggrecan were expressed at both protein and mRNA levels in CD146 + BMSCs cells after chondrogenic induction in vitro. In a mouse cartilage injury model, CD146 + BMSCs showed better function in promoting the repair of articular cartilage injury.

CONCLUSION

The prepared CD146-LMS was able to sort out CD146 + BMSCs efficiently, and the sorted subpopulation of CD146 + BMSCs had good chondrogenic differentiation potential, which could efficiently promote the repair of articular cartilage injury, suggesting that the sorted CD146 + BMSCs subpopulation is a promising seed cell for cartilage tissue engineering.

Extracellular vesicles are key players in mesenchymal stem cells' dual potential to regenerate and modulate the immune system

MSCs are used for treatment of inflammatory conditions or for regenerative purposes. MSCs are complete cells and allogenic transplantation is in principle possible, but mostly autologous use is preferred. In recent years, it was discovered that cells secrete extracellular vesicles. These are active budded off vesicles that carry a cargo. The cargo can be miRNA, protein, lipids etc. The extracellular vesicles can be transported through the body and fuse with target cells. Thereby, they influence the phenotype and modulate the disease. The extracellular vesicles have, like the MSCs, immunomodulatory or regenerative capacities. This review will focus on those features of extracellular vesicles and discuss their dual role. Besides the immunomodulation, the regeneration will concentrate on bone, cartilage, tendon, vessels and nerves. Current clinical trials with extracellular vesicles for immunomodulation and regeneration that started in the last five years are highlighted as well. In summary, extracellular vesicles have a great potential as disease modulating entity and treatment. Their dual characteristics need to be taken into account and often are both important for having the best effect.

Lineage-specific multifunctional double-layer scaffold accelerates the integrated regeneration of cartilage and subchondral bone

Repairing cartilage/subchondral bone defects that involve subchondral bone is a major challenge in clinical practice. Overall, the integrated repair of the structure and function of the osteochondral (OC) unit is very important. Some studies have demonstrated that the differentiation of cartilage is significantly enhanced by reducing the intake of nutrients such as lipids. This study demonstrates that using starvation can effectively optimize the therapeutic effect of bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells (BMSCs)-derived extracellular vesicles (EVs). A hyaluronic acid (HA)-based hydrogel containing starved BMSCs-EVs displayed continuous release for more than 3 weeks and significantly promoted the proliferation and biosynthesis of chondrocytes around the defect regulated by the forkhead-box class O (FOXO) pathway. When combined with vascular inhibitors, the hydrogel inhibited cartilage hypertrophy and facilitated the regeneration of hyaline cartilage. A porous methacrylate gelatine (GelMA)-based hydrogel containing calcium salt loaded with thrombin rapidly promoted haematoma formation upon contact with the bone marrow cavity to quickly block the pores and prevent the blood vessels in the bone marrow cavity from invading the cartilage layer. Furthermore, the haematoma could be used as nutrients to accelerate bone survival. The in vivo experiments demonstrated that the multifunctional lineage-specific hydrogel promoted the integrated regeneration of cartilage/subchondral bone. Thus, this hydrogel may represent a new strategy for osteochondral regeneration and repair.

BMSC-derived extracellular vesicles promoted osteogenesis via Axin2 inhibition by delivering MiR-16-5p

Osteoporosis (OP) is a systemic bone disease caused by an imbalance in osteogenesis and osteoclastic resorption. Extracellular vesicles (EVs)-encapsulated miRNAs from bone mesenchymal stem cells (BMSCs) have been reported to participate in osteogenesis. MiR-16-5p is one of the miRNAs that regulates osteogenic differentiation; however, studies have shown that its role in osteogenesis is controversial. Thus, this study aims to investigate the role of miR-16-5p from BMSC-derived extracellular vesicles (EVs) in osteogenic differentiation and uncover the underlying mechanisms. In this study, we used an ovariectomized (OVX) mouse model and an H₂O₂-treated BMSCs model to investigate the effects of BMSC-derived EVs and EV-encapsulated miR-16-5p on OP and the underlying mechanisms. Our results proved that the miR-16-5p level was significantly decreased in H₂O₂-treated BMSCs, bone tissues of OVX mice, and lumbar lamina tissues from osteoporotic women. EVs-encapsulated miR-16-5p from BMSCs could promote osteogenic differentiation. Moreover, the miR-16-5p mimics promoted osteogenic differentiation of H₂O₂-treated BMSCs, and the effects exerted by miR-16-5p were mediated by targeting Axin2, a scaffolding protein of GSK3β that negatively regulates the Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway. This study provides evidence that EVs-encapsulated miR-16-5p from BMSCs could promote osteogenic differentiation by repressing Axin2.

The role of autophagy in bone metabolism and clinical significance

The skeletal system is the basis of the vertebral body composition, which affords stabilization sites for muscle attachment, protects vital organs, stores mineral ions, supplies places to the hematopoietic system, and participates in complex endocrine and immune system. Not surprisingly, bones are constantly reabsorbed, formed, and remodeled under physiological conditions. Once bone metabolic homeostasis is interrupted (including inflammation, tumors, fractures, and bone metabolic diseases), the body rapidly initiates bone regeneration to maintain bone tissue structure and quality. Macroautophagy/autophagy is an essential metabolic process in eukaryotic cells, which maintains metabolic energy homeostasis and plays a vital role in bone regeneration by controlling molecular degradation and organelle renewal. One relatively new observation is that mesenchymal cells, osteoblasts, osteoclasts, osteocytes, chondrocytes, and vascularization process exhibit autophagy, and the molecular mechanisms and targets involved are being explored and updated. The role of autophagy is also emerging in degenerative diseases (intervertebral disc degeneration [IVDD], osteoarthritis [OA], etc.) and bone metabolic diseases (osteoporosis [OP], osteitis deformans, osteosclerosis). The use of autophagy regulators to modulate autophagy has benefited bone regeneration, including MTOR (mechanistic target of rapamycin kinase) inhibitors, AMPK activators, and emerging phytochemicals. The application of biomaterials (especially nanomaterials) to trigger autophagy is also an attractive research direction, which can exert superior therapeutic properties from the material-loaded molecules/drugs or the material's properties such as shape, roughness, surface chemistry, etc. All of these have essential clinical significance with the discovery of autophagy associated signals, pathways, mechanisms, and treatments in bone diseases in the future.Abbreviations: Δψm: mitochondrial transmembrane potential AMPK: AMP-activated protein kinase ARO: autosomal recessive osteosclerosis ATF4: activating transcription factor 4 ATG: autophagy-related β-ECD: β-ecdysone BMSC: bone marrow mesenchymal stem cell ER: endoplasmic reticulum FOXO: forkhead box O GC: glucocorticoid HIF1A/HIF-1α: hypoxia inducible factor 1 subunit alpha HSC: hematopoietic stem cell HSP: heat shock protein IGF1: insulin like growth factor 1 IL1B/IL-1β: interleukin 1 beta IVDD: intervertebral disc degradation LPS: lipopolysaccharide MAPK: mitogen-activated protein kinase MSC: mesenchymal stem cell MTOR: mechanistic target of rapamycin kinase NP: nucleus pulposus NPWT: negative pressure wound therapy OA: osteoarthritis OP: osteoporosis PTH: parathyroid hormone ROS: reactive oxygen species SIRT1: sirtuin 1 SIRT3: sirtuin 3 SQSTM1/p62: sequestosome 1 TNFRSF11B/OPG: TNF receptor superfamily member 11b TNFRSF11A/RANK: tumor necrosis factor receptor superfamily, member 11a TNFSF11/RANKL: tumor necrosis factor (ligand) superfamily, member 11 TSC1: tuberous sclerosis complex 1 ULK1: unc-51 like autophagy activating kinase 1.

Biomaterials constructed for MSC-derived extracellular vesicle loading and delivery—a promising method for tissue regeneration

Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) have become the preferred seed cells for tissue regeneration. Nevertheless, due to their immunogenicity and tumorigenicity, MSC transplantation remains questionable. Extracellular vesicles (EVs) derived from MSCs are becoming a promising substitute for MSCs. As a route of the MSC paracrine, EVs have a nano-sized and bilayer lipid-enclosed structure, which can guarantee the integrity of their cargoes, but EVs cannot obtain full function in vivo because of the rapid biodegradation and clearance by phagocytosis. To improve the efficacy and targeting of EVs, methods have been proposed and put into practice, especially engineered vesicles and EV-controlled release systems. In particular, EVs can be cell or tissue targeting because they have cell-specific ligands on their surfaces, but their targeting ability may be eliminated by the biodegradation of the phagocytic system during circulation. Novel application strategies have been proposed beyond direct injecting. EV carriers such as biodegradable hydrogels and other loading systems have been applied in tissue regeneration, and EV engineering is also a brand-new method for higher efficacy. In this review, we distinctively summarize EV engineering and loading system construction methods, emphasizing targeting modification methods and controlled release systems for EVs, which few literature reviews have involved.

Cell-based therapies for rheumatoid arthritis: opportunities and challenges

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is the most common immune-mediated inflammatory disease characterized by chronic synovitis that hardly resolves spontaneously. The current treatment of RA consists of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), glucocorticoids, conventional disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (cDMARDs), biologic and targeted synthetic DMARDs. Although the treat-to-target strategy has been intensively applied in the past decade, clinical unmet needs still exist since a substantial proportion of patients are refractory or even develop severe adverse effects to current therapies. In recent years, with the deeper understanding of immunopathogenesis of the disease, cell-based therapies have exhibited effective and promising interventions to RA. Several cell-based therapies, such as mesenchymal stem cells (MSC), adoptive transfer of regulatory T cells (Treg), and chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-T cell therapy as well as their beneficial effects have been documented and verified so far. In this review, we summarize the current evidence and discuss the prospect as well as challenges for these three types of cellular therapies in RA.