Statins and prevention of venous thromboembolism: Myth or reality?

Risk of Venous Thromboembolism in Statin Users Compared to Fibrate Users in the United Kingdom Clinical Practice Research Datalink (UK CPRD) GOLD

Background

A substantial proportion of adults receive statins for treatment of hypercholesterolemia and cardiovascular risk, and statins have been found to improve outcomes in this patient population. However, studies have not consistently demonstrated the potential benefits of statins in preventing venous thromboembolism (VTE). Therefore, we conducted this study to investigate this association.

Methods

We conducted a cohort analysis in a study sample comprised of 40-79-year-old patients with hyperlipidemia who received at least one fibrate or statin prescription between January 1995 and December 2018 in the United Kingdom Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD) GOLD. We evaluated the association between statin use and incident unprovoked VTE, compared to fibrate use, an active comparator, using Kaplan-Meier (KM) analysis, Poisson regression (with and without propensity score matching), and inverse probability of treatment weights (IPTW) marginal structural models (MSM).

Results

In this cohort of 166,292 patients with hyperlipidemia, 0.81% (N=1,353) developed incident unprovoked VTE. In analyses using the KM method, patients who received statins had a slightly lower risk of VTE compared to those who received fibrates (Log rank test: p=0.0524). The adjusted incident rate ratio (95% CI) for VTE, calculated using Poisson regression, controlling for serum cholesterol and other baseline covariates, in patients prescribed statins compared to fibrates was 0.77 (0.45-1.33) in the full cohort, 0.74 (0.38-1.45) in the propensity score matched analysis, and 0.51 (95% conservative CI: 0.34-0.76) in the IPTW MSM analysis.

Conclusion

While the magnitude of effect varied across the different analytic methods, there is consistent evidence for a protective effect of statin use on the occurrence of unprovoked VTE.

Differential effect of statin use on coagulation markers: an active comparative analysis in the NEO study

Background

Statins are a potential treatment for venous thromboembolism (VTE) prophylaxis complementary to conventional anticoagulants without associated bleeding complications. This study aimed to compare pro-thrombotic activities of different classes of lipid-lowering drugs in an active comparator design and determine whether there is a relation between statin versus fibrate/niacin use and pro-coagulant factor outcomes.

Methods

This is a cross-sectional analysis of participants from the Netherlands Epidemiology of Obesity study using any class of lipid-lowering drugs, including any types of statins, niacin, and fibrates. We performed linear regression analyses to determine fibrinogen, factor (F) VIII, FIX, and FXI activity in statins versus fibrate/niacin users and adjusted for age, sex, tobacco smoking, body mass index (BMI), hypertension, diabetes, and prevalent cardiovascular disease.

Results

Among 1043 participants, the mean age was 58.4 ± 5.2 years, 61% were men, and the mean BMI was 31.3 ± 4.5 kg/m². Clinical characteristics were balanced between statin and fibrate/niacin users. Statin users had lower mean FXI (18.3 IU/dL, 95% confidence interval (CI) 9.4 to 27.3) levels compared to fibrate/niacin users. The level of FVIII (15.8 IU/dL, 95% CI − 0.003 to 31.6), and FIX (11.3 IU/dL, 95% CI − 0.4 to 23.2) were lower in statin users than fibrate/niacin users with marginal statistical significance.

Conclusion

Current statin use was associated with lower plasma levels of FXI than fibrate/niacin use. The effects on coagulation factors may, in part, explain the benefit of statin therapy rendered in primary and secondary prevention of VTE.

Protective Effects of Statins Administration in European and North American Patients Infected with COVID-19: A Meta-Analysis

Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 has spread rapidly throughout the world, becoming an overwhelming global health emergency. The array of injuries caused by this virus is broad and not limited to the respiratory system, but encompassing also extensive endothelial and systemic tissue damage. Since statins effectively improve endothelial function, these drugs may have beneficial effects in patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Therefore, this investigation aimed to provide an updated overview on the interplay between statins and COVID-19, with particular focus on their potentially protective role against progression toward severe or critical illness and death. A systematic electronic search was performed in Scopus and PubMed up to present time. Data on statins use and COVID-19 outcomes especially in studies performed in Europe and North America were extracted and pooled. A total of seven studies met our inclusion criteria, totaling 2,398 patients (1,075 taking statins, i.e., 44.8%). Overall, statin usage in Western patients hospitalized with COVID-19 was associated with nearly 40% lower odds of progressing toward severe illness or death (odds ratio: 0.59; 95% confidence interval: 0.35-0.99). After excluding studies in which statin therapy was started during hospital admission, the beneficial effect of these drugs was magnified (odds ratio: 0.51; 95% confidence interval: 0.41-0.64). In conclusion, although randomized trials would be necessary to confirm these preliminary findings, current evidence would support a favorable effect of statins as adjuvant therapy in patients with COVID-19. Irrespective of these considerations, suspension of statin therapy seems highly unadvisable in COVID-19 patients.

Rosuvastatin for the prevention of venous thromboembolism: a pooled analysis of the HOPE-3 and JUPITER randomized controlled trials

AIMS

To examine the association between rosuvastatin and VTE risk, and whether effects vary in different subpopulations stratified by key demographic, cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk factors and other risk factors associated with VTE.

METHODS AND RESULTS

An individual participant data meta-analysis was conducted across two randomized controlled trials in 30,507 participants over a mean follow up of 3.62 years, Individuals had no prior history of vascular disease but were at intermediate CV risk. In both trials, participants were randomized to receive rosuvastatin or matching placebo. The primary outcome was VTE during follow-up, defined as either deep vein thrombosis or pulmonary embolism. Associations between rosuvastatin and VTE were examined in the overall pooled cohort, and subpopulations stratified by demographic risk factors (i.e. age, sex), CVD risk factors (i.e. obesity, smoking, lipid levels, blood pressure levels, C-reactive protein level), and a history of cancer.Mean age was 65.96 (SD 7.19) years of age, and 17,832 (58.45%) were male. 5,434 (17.82%) were smokers, median BMI was 27.6 (Interquartile range [IQR] 24.7 - 31.1) kg/m2, and median CRP level was 3.4 (IQR 2.1 - 6.0) mg/L. There were 139 VTE events. In the pooled cohort, rosuvastatin was associated with a large proportional reduction in the risk of VTE (hazard ratio 0.53, 95% CI 0.37 - 0.75). No significant interactions were observed between treatment with rosuvastatin and the risk of VTE across subpopulations stratified by demographic, CVD risk factors or a history of cancer (p-values for interactions >0.05 for all subgroups).

CONCLUSIONS

Rosuvastatin is associated with a 47% proportional reduction in the risk of VTE, and its effect is consistent both in the presence or absence of VTE related clinical risk factors.

TRANSLATIONAL PERSPECTIVE

In this individual participant data meta-analysis of two large randomized controlled trials comparing rosuvastatin to placebo, rosuvastatin was associated with a 47% proportional reduction in the risk of VTE. The effect of rosuvastatin was consistent across a broad range of demographic factors, cardiovascular risk factors, and a history of cancer. This study demonstrates that rosuvastatin is broadly affective at reducing the risk of VTE both in the presence or absence of VTE associated clinical risk factors. Results inform future research on the use of statins for this indication.

Statins, haemostatic factors and thrombotic risk

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Statins reduce cholesterol synthesis and promote low-density lipoprotein clearance from circulation. Beyond their cholesterol-lowering action, statins may interfere with haemostasis. This review aims to provide an update on the impact of statin treatment on markers of haemostasis and platelet function and on thrombosis-related outcomes.

RECENT FINDINGS

Different coagulation factors are modulated by statins, leading to inhibition of coagulation and increased fibrinolysis. Also, an impact of statins on platelet function has been documented. From a clinical perspective, several observational studies have revealed a reduced incidence of venous thromboembolism in patients receiving statins, which has been argued in some available studies and meta-analyses. Furthermore, a beneficial effect of early statin initiation following acute coronary syndrome for short-term prevention of thrombosis-related events has been documented, but the available data are still not consistent.

SUMMARY

Although statins influence the levels of a multitude of haemostatic factors in an antithrombotic direction, data supporting their use for venous thromboembolism prevention are not consistent, and the impact of statins on early vascular events following acute coronary syndrome is still debated. Whether the robust long-term beneficial effects of statins in reducing cardiovascular risk may be also explained by persistent changes in haemostatic factors needs further exploration.

Increased risk and severity of unprovoked venous thromboembolism with clustering cardiovascular risk factors for atherosclerosis: Results of the REMOTEV registry

BACKGROUND

The role of cardiovascular risk factors (CVRF) for atherosclerosis in venous thromboembolic disease (VTE) is controversial. The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of CVRF and their cumulative effects on the occurrence of unprovoked VTE, severity, recurrence and survival.

METHODS AND RESULTS

This is a prospective cohort from the REMOTEV registry including all consecutively hospitalized patients for acute symptomatic VTE. From November 2013 to December 2016, 515 patients with 6months follow-up (FU) were selected for the analysis. Events were classified as unprovoked or provoked VTE. In univariate analysis, hypertension (OR 1.44, [95% CI 1.01-2.06]), diabetes (OR 2.07, [95% CI: 1.25-3.55]) and age (OR 1.94, [95% CI: 1.31-2.88]) were significantly associated with the risk of unprovoked VTE. After adjustment, diabetes (OR 1.82, [95% CI: 1.07-3.18]) and age (OR 1.79, [95% CI: 1.15-2.8]) remained associated with the risk of unprovoked VTE. The proportion of unprovoked VTE increased significantly with the number of CVRF adjusted for thrombophilia (1 CVRF: OR 3 [95% CI: 1.44-6.52]) 2 CVRF: OR 4.33 [95% CI: 2.07-9.49] and ≥3 CVRF: OR 4.58 [95% CI: 2.27-9.7]). The severity of pulmonary embolism was significantly associated with CVRF clustering. There were more VTE recurrences and deaths during the 6months of FU with cumulative CVRF.

CONCLUSION

The risks of unprovoked VTE and PE severity are associated with clustering CVRF. The role of cumulative CVRF predominates rather than the specific burden of each of the CVRF in the risk of VTE occurrence.

Statins and secondary prevention of venous thromboembolism: pooled analysis of published observational cohort studies

AIMS

There have been suggestions that statins may have a potential role in secondary prevention of venous thromboembolism (VTE) [which includes deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism (PE)], but the evidence is inconsistent. We aimed to evaluate the association between statin use and risk of recurrent VTE.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational cohort studies. All relevant studies which reported associations between statin use and recurrent VTE outcomes were identified from MEDLINE, EMBASE, Web of Science, and manual search of bibliographies from inception to January 2017. Study specific relative risks (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals were aggregated using random effects models. Eight eligible studies comprising of 103 576 participants and 13 168 recurrent VTE outcomes were included in the pooled analysis. In pooled analysis of 7 studies, the RR for recurrent VTE was 0.73 (0.68-0.79) when comparing statin use with no use. There was no evidence of heterogeneity between contributing studies (I2=0%, 0-71%; P = 0.93). The RRs for recurrent PE (three studies) and DVT (two studies) comparing statin use with no statin use were 0.75 (95% CI: 0.58-0.96) and 0.66 (95% CI: 0.60-0.71) respectively.

CONCLUSION

Available evidence from observational cohort studies suggests a beneficial effect of statin use on VTE recurrence. Well-designed intervention studies are needed to corroborate these findings.