Alcohol detoxification completion, acceptance of referral to substance abuse treatment, and entry into substance abuse treatment among Alaska Native people

The use of patient navigation to transition detoxification patients to substance use treatment in the Alaska Interior

Objectives

Detoxification clinics manage acute intoxication and withdrawal from alcohol and other drugs. At discharge, patients are referred to treatment, yet many are readmitted to detoxification, creating a "revolving door" of discharges and admissions. This pattern disproportionately affects some groups such as Alaska Native and American Indian (AN/AI) people. The primary goals of this study are to: 1) test the effectiveness of a patient navigation intervention to increase rates of transition to alcohol treatment following detoxification, and 2) prevent readmission to detoxification within 12-months. The secondary goal is a cost-effectiveness and cost-benefit evaluation of patient navigation.

Study design

This randomized controlled comparative effectiveness trial plans to recruit 440 patients (∼70% AN/AI) admitted to alcohol detoxification. We collaborated with Fairbanks Native Association (FNA) to select an appropriate intervention, control condition, and other study-related decisions. Here, we describe intervention development, study design, challenges encountered during implementation, and collaborative processes to identify solutions.

Methods

Participants are equally randomized to the control (one motivational interviewing session) or intervention (one motivational interviewing session plus up to four weeks of patient navigation). The primary outcomes are successful transition to alcohol treatment within 30-days after discharge and detoxification readmission within 12-months. The secondary outcome is health-related quality of life.

Conclusion

Patient navigation is successful in other settings and for other health conditions. It may assist in overcoming barriers to successful transition to substance use treatment and may augment interventions, such as motivational interviewing, that are less resource-intensive but may not be optimally effective by themselves.

ClinicalTrialsgov Identifier

NCT03737864.

Culturally tailored substance use interventions for Indigenous people of North America: a systematic review

Purpose–

The purpose of the current study is to conduct a systematic review of peer-reviewed work on culturally tailored interventions for alcohol and drug use in Indigenous adults in North America. Substance use has been reported as a health concern for many Indigenous communities. Indigenous groups experienced the highest drug overdose death rates in 2015, the largest percentage increase in the number of deaths over time from 1999 to 2015 compared to any other racial group. However, few Indigenous individuals report participating in treatment for alcohol or drug use, which may reflect the limited engagement that Indigenous groups have with treatment options that are accessible, effective and culturally integrative.

Design/methodology/approach–

Electronic searches were conducted from 2000 to April 21, 2021, using PsycINFO, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, MEDLINE and PubMed. Two reviewers classified abstracts for study inclusion, resulting in 18 studies.

Findings–

Most studies were conducted in the USA (89%). Interventions were largely implemented in Tribal/rural settings (61%), with a minority implemented in both Tribal and urban contexts (11%). Study samples ranged from 4 to 742 clients. Interventions were most often conducted in residential treatment settings (39%). Only one (6%) intervention focused on opioid use among Indigenous people. Most interventions addressed the use of both drugs and alcohol (72%), with only three (17%) interventions specifically intended to reduce alcohol use.

Originality/value–

The results of this research lend insight into the characteristics of culturally integrative treatment options for Indigenous groups and highlight the need for increased investment in research related to culturally tailored treatment across the diverse landscape of Indigenous populations.

Assessing the Predictive Validity of the Stages of Change Readiness and Treatment Eagerness Scale (SOCRATES) in Alaska Native and American Indian People

OBJECTIVES

The objective of this study was to examine the predictive validity of the Stages of Change Readiness and Treatment Eagerness Scale (SOCRATES) among Alaska Native and American Indian (ANAI) people with an alcohol use disorder.

METHODS

The sample was 170 ANAI adults with an alcohol use disorder living in Anchorage, Alaska who were part of a larger alcohol intervention study. The primary outcome of this study was alcohol use as measured by mean urinary ethyl glucuronide (EtG). EtG urine tests were collected at baseline and then up to twice a week for four weeks. We conducted bivariate linear regression analyses to evaluate associations between mean EtG value and each of the three SOCRATES subscales (Recognition, Ambivalence, and Taking Steps) and other covariates such as demographic characteristics, alcohol use history, and chemical dependency service utilization. We then performed multivariable linear regression modeling to examine these associations after adjusting for covariates.

RESULTS

After adjusting for covariates, mean EtG values were negatively associated with the Taking Steps (P = 0.017) and Recognition (P = 0.005) subscales of the SOCRATES among ANAI people living in Alaska. We did not find an association between mean EtG values and the Ambivalence subscale (P = 0.129) of the SOCRATES after adjusting for covariates.

CONCLUSIONS

Higher scores on the Taking Steps and Recognition subscales of the SOCRATES at baseline among ANAI people predicted lower mean EtG values. This study has important implications for communities and clinicians who need tools to assist ANAI clients in initiating behavior changes related to alcohol use.

Residential and nonresidential substance use treatment within Indigenous populations: a systematic review

Examining treatment outcomes of nonresidential and residential treatment programs may suggest best practices for Indigenous communities delivering treatment services. A systematic review of peer-reviewed and gray literatures comparing treatment outcomes for Indigenous populations was completed. Three studies compared treatment outcomes and reported varying results. Reported outcomes were retention and relapse rates, cultural knowledge, and participant treatment duration. Most retrieved studies described residential treatment outcomes, but it was unclear whether this modality is the best option for Indigenous people seeking treatment. Further research describing treatment modalities, across a continuum of care, situated within culturally developed treatment frameworks is required.