Rethinking indicators of problematic cannabis use in the era of medical cannabis legalization

Conceptualizing problematic use of medicinal Cannabis: Development and preliminary validation of a brief screening questionnaire

The use of Medicinal Cannabis (MC) for treating chronic pain is increasing, globally, yet the definition of problematic MC use remains unclear. Defining problematic use of cannabis in medical and non-medical contexts may be fundamentally different since individuals prescribed MC often experience physical dependence, which do not necessarily imply pathology. We aimed to conceptualize problematic use of MC and develop a brief questionnaire for identifying and quantifying problematic MC use. Content validation used a broad definition of problematic substance use, adapting and compiling an initial list of 36 items from various sources: (a) screening tools for assessing problematic prescription opioid medication use; (b) screening tools for problematic recreational cannabis use and (c) qualitative interviews with MC patients. 390 American self-identified chronic pain patients holding a MC card rated each item from the initial list on a 5-point frequency scale and filled out questionnaires assessing various clinical outcomes. Following initial item titration, a multi-group measurement invariance comparison strategy, using two external indicators: alcohol-related problems and depression, resulted a final eight-item list that met fit quality in a baseline model, presented excellent internal consistency reliability (α = 0.929), and significantly correlated with anxiety and low quality of life. Items in the final list related predominantly to negative consequences of MC use. Problematic use of MC is characterized by negative physiological, social, emotional and functional consequences. The final eight-item list was named the Medicinal Cannabis Negative Consequences Scale (MCNCS), emerging as a brief measure for problematic MC use and demonstrating preliminary reliability and validity, which could aid clinicians and researchers.

Mental and Physical Health-Related Cannabis Motives Mediate the Relationship between Childhood Trauma and Problematic Cannabis Use over Time among Emerging Adult Cannabis Users

BACKGROUND

While growing evidence has identified mental and physical health-related cannabis use motives as significant mechanisms between childhood trauma and problematic cannabis use (PCU) for emerging adults (EA), there is a need to understand the longitudinal stability of these pathways and how they impact PCU as cannabis users age into later adulthood.

METHODS

The current study extends an analysis examining the impact of childhood trauma (e.g., emotional abuse, sexual abuse) on multiple indicators of PCU through a range of cannabis use motives. 339 medical cannabis patient and non-patient EA users from the Los Angeles area were sampled at baseline (mean age = 21.23; SD = 2.48). The present analysis used four waves of follow-up data collected from 2016 to 2018 (W3, W4) and 2019-2020 (W5, W6).

RESULTS

Use of cannabis to cope with nausea, sleep, pain, and emotional distress mediated the relationships between some types of childhood abuse and PCU at W4, though most associations attenuated by later adulthood (W6). Specifically, greater emotional distress and nausea motives were associated with greater PCU in models of emotional abuse and neglect and sexual abuse, with emotional distress continuing to mediate at W6. Conversely, sleep and pain motives were associated with lower PCU in models for emotional neglect.

CONCLUSIONS

Mental and physical health-related motives reflect potential intervenable factors that predict PCU in emerging adulthood among EA cannabis users with histories of childhood trauma. Results highlight the importance of and value for assessing a wide range of motives and PCU outcomes to target and address areas for intervention.

Negative experiences of patients using medicinal cannabis: A systematic review of qualitative studies

AIMS AND OBJECTIVES

In this study, we systematically reviewed qualitative studies concerning patients' experience with medicinal cannabis (MC) use, to gain insight into the negative effects of MC.

BACKGROUND

Over the past decades, the use of MC for therapeutic purposes has increased. However, there is conflicting and insufficient data on possible negative physiological and psychological effects of MC treatment.

DESIGN

A systematic review was conducted and the PRISMA guidelines were adopted. Literature searches were conducted using PubMed, PsycINFO and EMBASE. Critical Appraisal Skills Programme (CASP) qualitative checklist used to assess risk of bias in the included studies.

METHODS

We included studies focusing on conventional medical treatment using cannabis-based products, approved by a physician for a particular health issue.

RESULTS

Of the 1230 articles identified in the initial search, eight articles were included in the review. Following the compilation of themes in the eligible studies, six themes were identified: (1) MC approval; (2) administrative barriers; (3) social perception; (4) MC misuse/widespread effect; (5) adverse effects; and (6) dependence or addiction. These were grouped into two meta-themes: (1) administrative and social aspects of MC use; and (2) experiences of the effects of medicinal cannabis.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings call for specific attention to unique consequences associated with MC use. Further research is needed in order to assess the degree to which negative experiences associated with MC use may affect various aspects of patients' medical condition.

RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE

Describing the complex experience of MC treatment and its spectrum of consequences for patients may enable physicians, therapists and researchers to provide more attentive and accurate MC treatment to their patients.

PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION

In this review, patients' narratives were explored, yet the research methods did not directly involve patients or the public.

Assessing the diagnostic utility of the Cannabis Use Disorder Identification Test - Revised (CUDIT-R) among veterans with medical and non-medical cannabis use

BACKGROUND

Few studies examine the utility of the Cannabis Use Disorder Identification Test - Revised (CUDIT-R) in relation to the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition, (DSM-5) criteria for cannabis use disorder (CUD). This study assesses the performance of the CUDIT-R among a sample of Veterans with and without medical cannabis use.

METHODS

We approached and consented primary care patients presenting to one of three Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) Medical Centers. Veterans with at least monthly cannabis use and complete CUD data at baseline were included in this analysis (n=234). CUDIT-R scores were compared against Alcohol Use Disorder and Associated Disabilities Interview Schedule-5 (DSM-5) CUD as the standard to calculate measures of validity (sensitivity, specificity), identify optimal CUDIT-R cutoff values, and assess the diagnostic proficiency of the CUDIT-R using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves. We further stratified analyses by active medical cannabis card holder status and DSM-5 CUD severity (any, moderate, and severe).

RESULTS

Among the entire sample, 38.9% qualified for any DSM-5 CUD, with 10.7% and 3.0% meeting criteria for moderate and severe CUD, respectively. We identified optimal CUDIT-R scores at 10 for any DSM-5 CUD (sensitivity=0.58; specificity=0.80), at 12 for moderate CUD (sensitivity=0.72; specificity=0.82), and at 14 for severe CUD (sensitivity=0.71; specificity=0.87). ROC curves showed higher CUDIT-R validity among non-card holders compared with medical cannabis card holders.

CONCLUSION

The present study identified optimal CUDIT-R cutoff scores for Veterans who use cannabis. Varying DSM-5 validity measures inform the need for population-specific CUDIT-R cutoff values.

Does recreational cannabis legalization change cannabis use patterns? Evidence from secondary school students in Uruguay

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

In 2013, Uruguay became the first country to legalize and regulate the production and distribution of cannabis for recreational use. We measured whether Uruguay's non-commercial model of recreational cannabis legalization was associated with changes in the prevalence of risky and frequent cannabis use among secondary school students.

DESIGN

We used data from repeated cross-sectional surveys of secondary students in Uruguay and Chile (2007-2018). Using a difference-in-difference approach, we evaluated changes in the prevalence of past-year, past-month, any risky and frequent cannabis use following enactment (2014) and implementation (2016) of cannabis legalization among the full sample of secondary students and among students who reported past-year/month use. We examined changes separately for students ages 12 to 17, and students for whom cannabis became legally accessible, ages 18 to 21.

SETTING

Uruguay and Chile (2007-2018).

PARTICIPANTS

Secondary school students in 8th, 10th and 12th grade (n = 204 730).

MEASUREMENTS

Past-year and past-month cannabis use; any risky cannabis use measured with the Cannabis Abuse Screening Test (CAST); and frequent cannabis use (10+ days in the past-month).

FINDINGS

We found a decrease in past-year and past-month use following enactment or implementation. Among students ages 18 to 21, post-enactment, we observed a transitory increase in 2014 that decreased thereafter for: any risky use among those who reported past-year use (prevalence difference [PD] = 13.5%; 95% CI: 2.0, 24.9), frequent use in the full sample (PD = 4.5%; 95% CI: 1.0, 8.1), and frequent use among those who reported past-month use (PD = 16.8%; 95% CI: 1.9, 31.8).

CONCLUSION

The legalization of recreational cannabis in Uruguay was not associated with overall increases in either past-year/past-month cannabis use or with multi-year changes in any risky and frequent cannabis use among young people.

Coping Motives Mediate the Association of Trauma History with Problematic Cannabis Use in Young Adult Medical Cannabis Patients and Non-Patient Cannabis Users

Background: Despite evidence of the contribution of childhood trauma to the development of problematic cannabis use, its mediating pathways are largely unknown. Given the link between cannabis motives with trauma and problematic cannabis use, motives of use may represent a construct through which trauma impacts problematic cannabis use. Methods: A sample of 339 medical cannabis patient and non-patient young adult users from the Los Angeles area were sampled at baseline and one year later. The current study examined the impact of childhood trauma on problematic use through a variety of cannabis use motives. Results: Controlling for age, socioeconomic status, perceived stress, and baseline problematic use, endorsing the use of cannabis to cope with distress at baseline uniquely mediated the associations between different childhood trauma types (e.g., physical abuse, neglect, sexual trauma) and problematic use one year later. Experience of any childhood trauma was positively associated with coping motives, whereas emotional and physical abuse were positively associated with pain motives, and sexual abuse was positively associated with sleep motives. Using cannabis for coping and increasing attention/focus were also positively associated with higher problematic use, whereas using cannabis for sleep was inversely associated with problematic use one year later. Conclusions: The motives of coping with distress and inattention may represent intermediate constructs through which trauma leads to later problematic cannabis use. Results highlight the need to clarify the pathways between health and non-health-oriented motives and cannabis use over time.

Adverse Childhood Experiences in relation to drug and alcohol use in the 30 days prior to incarceration in a county jail

Purpose

To characterize the relationship between adverse childhood experiences (ACEs) and substance use among people incarcerated in a county jail.

Design/methodology/approach

A questionnaire was administered to 199 individuals incarcerated in a Southwest county jail as part of a social-epidemiological exploration of converging co-morbidities in incarcerated populations. Among 96 participants with complete ACEs data, the authors determined associations between individual ACEs items and a summative score with methamphetamine (meth), heroin, other opiates, and cocaine use and binge drinking in the 30 days prior to incarceration using logistic regression.

Findings

People who self-reported use of methamphetamine, heroin, other opiates, or cocaine in the 30 days prior to incarceration had higher average ACEs scores. Methamphetamine use was significantly associated with living with anyone who served time in a correctional facility and with someone trying to make them touch sexually. Opiate use was significantly associated with living with anyone who was depressed, mentally ill, or suicidal; living with anyone who used illegal street drugs or misused prescription medications; and if an adult touched them sexually. Binge drinking was significantly associated with having lived with someone who was a problem drinker or alcoholic.

Originality

Significant associations between methamphetamine use and opiate use and specific adverse childhood experiences suggest important entry points for improving jail and community programming.

Social Implications

Our findings point to a need for research to understand differences between methamphetamine use and opiate use in relation to particular adverse experiences during childhood, and a need for tailored intervention for people incarcerated in jail.

Associations of cannabis use frequency and cannabis use disorder with receiving a substance use screen and healthcare professional discussion of substance use

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Screening, brief intervention, and referral to treatment (SBIRT) can reduce substance use, but receipt of these services by those who use cannabis frequently and have cannabis use disorder (CUD) remains unexplored. We examined cannabis use frequency and CUD's associations with the odds of receiving a substance use screening and a healthcare professional discussion among those who used healthcare services.

METHODS

Data came from the 2015-2019 National Survey on Drug Use and Health (N = 214,505 aged 18+). Among adults who used cannabis and attended healthcare settings in the past year (N = 36,374), multivariable logistic regression analysis was used to examine associations of cannabis use frequency and CUD with receiving a substance use screen and substance use discussion by a healthcare professional.

RESULTS

Cannabis use frequency was associated with higher odds of receiving a screen (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] = 1.27, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.14-1.41 for 300+ days of use) and a discussion among those screened (AOR = 1.83, 95% CI = 1.60-2.09 for 300+ days of use). CUD was not associated with receiving a screen, but it was positively associated with receiving a discussion among those screened (AOR = 1.22, 95% CI = 1.08-1.39). Nonmedical users were less likely to have a discussion among those screened and not screened.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS

Findings indicate disparities in screening and discussion of substance use with patients, especially between medical and nonmedical users.

SCIENTIFIC SIGNIFICANCE

Study findings provide novel insight into differences in the reach of SBIRT services among adult cannabis users.

Situating the Continuum of Overdose Risk in the Social Determinants of Health: A New Conceptual Framework

Policy Points This article reconceptualizes our understanding of the opioid epidemic and proposes six strategies that address the epidemic's social roots. In order to successfully reduce drug-related mortality over the long term, policymakers and public health leaders should develop partnerships with people who use drugs, incorporate harm reduction interventions, and reverse decades of drug criminalization policies.

CONTEXT

Drug overdose is the leading cause of injury-related death in the United States. Synthetic opioids, predominantly illicit fentanyl and its analogs, surpassed prescription opioids and heroin in associated mortality rates in 2016. Unfortunately, interventions fail to fully address the current wave of the opioid epidemic and often omit the voices of people with lived experiences regarding drug use. Every overdose death is a culmination of a long series of policy failures and lost opportunities for harm reduction.

METHODS

In this article, we conducted a scoping review of the opioid literature to propose a novel framework designed to foreground social determinants more directly into our understanding of this national emergency. The "continuum of overdose risk" framework is our synthesis of the global evidence base and is grounded in contemporary theories, models, and policies that have been successfully applied both domestically and internationally.

FINDINGS

De-escalating overdose risk in the long term will require scaling up innovative and comprehensive solutions that have been designed through partnerships with people who use drugs and are rooted in harm reduction.

CONCLUSIONS

Without recognizing the full drug-use continuum and the role of social determinants, the current responses to drug overdose will continue to aggravate the problem they are trying to solve.

Cannabis Use in Persons With Inflammatory Bowel Disease and Vulnerability to Substance Misuse

BACKGROUND

It is unknown whether cannabis users self-medicating their inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) symptoms are more likely to have comorbid mental health or personality risk factors associated with an increased potential for substance misuse compared with recreational cannabis users.

METHODS

We surveyed individuals with IBD about their cannabis use, their mental health symptoms, and personality risk factors associated with substance misuse. We compared risk factors for substance misuse between individuals using cannabis to manage IBD symptoms and those using cannabis recreationally.

RESULTS

Of 201 persons with IBD who completed the questionnaire, 108 reported lifetime cannabis use. Of those, a larger proportion of Crohn's disease patients used cannabis to manage IBD symptoms (53% [34/64] vs 28% [12/43]; P = 0.010). Individuals self-medicating with cannabis were more likely to use cannabis for coping reasons (P = 0.016) and demonstrated higher levels of impulsivity (P = 0.004) and depressive symptoms (P = 0.012) when compared with individuals using cannabis recreationally. Logistic regression revealed that cannabis was 4.1 times (P = 0.05) and 3.7 times (P = 0.05) more likely to be used for IBD symptoms by smokers and individuals with moderate-severe depressive symptoms, respectively. Individuals high in impulsivity were 4.1 times more likely to use cannabis for their IBD symptoms than those low in impulsivity (P = 0.005).

CONCLUSIONS

Persons with IBD self-medicating with cannabis have characteristics associated with increased vulnerability to substance misuse when compared with those using cannabis recreationally. Screening for mental health comorbidities and vulnerability to substance misuse should be undertaken if cannabis is to be used to treat IBD symptoms.

Evaluation of Breath and Plasma Tetrahydrocannabinol Concentration Trends Postcannabis Exposure in Medical Cannabis Patients

The legalization of cannabis in Canada brings novel challenges across various fronts, such as policy development, law enforcement, and public health and safety. It is imperative to improve our understanding of the mechanisms and trends surrounding cannabis use to develop efficacious methods of tackling these challenges. Materials and Methods: Patients' breath collection was achieved using the ExaBreath device from SensAbues. THC measurements in plasma and breath samples were processed and analyzed using LC-MS/MS. Discussion: We conducted a pragmatic clinical trial on 23 medical cannabis patients, wherein we collected breath and plasma samples intermittently for 4 hours after cannabis consumption. The research participants consumed between 1 and 2 g of cannabis by either vaping, cannabis cigarette, or concentrated wax (dabs) for 10 min. We used standardized laboratory analytical techniques using liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry to analyze both the breath and plasma sample. To analyze the data and find patterns, we developed models using artificial neural network analysis. Conclusion: Our findings show that tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) breath concentrations peaked in 0.5 hours and reached baseline levels after 2 hours in all the patients. We found an inverse correlation between individuals' body mass index and their peak breath concentrations, and an inverse relationship between age and peak breath concentrations. Male participants had higher peak breath and plasma concentrations than female participants. Our research provides new insight into the correlations between breath and plasma THC concentrations in medical cannabis patients.

Medical Cannabis Use among Adults in the Southeastern United States

OBJECTIVES

To assess the self-reported reasons for medical cannabis use within the southeastern United States and compare recreational and medical cannabis users.

METHODS

This study was a cross-sectional survey administered in 2017 through Amazon's Mechanical Turk and enrolled 432 adult, regular cannabis users. Measures included demographics, cannabis use characteristics, and medical reasons for cannabis use.

RESULTS

Under half (47%) of respondents endorsed using cannabis for both medical and recreational reasons and 12% reported medical use only. The most commonly cited reasons for medical cannabis use were psychiatric and 60 unique medical conditions were listed. Recreational and medical users were similar on several measures of current use, but did vary in their use history, methods of use, and product knowledge.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite state laws and conclusive scientific evidence to support medical cannabis use for certain conditions, cannabis is still used frequently for a range of medical issues.

POLICY IMPLICATIONS

These data may assist healthcare providers in better understanding medical cannabis use in states with tightened restrictions and tailoring information to medical cannabis users about their specific conditions and prioritizing therapeutic options.