1
|
Benabdallah N, Lu P, Abou DS, Zhang H, Ulmert D, Hobbs RF, Gay HA, Simons BW, Saeed MA, Rogers BE, Jha AK, Tai YC, Malone CD, Ippolito JE, Michalski J, Jennings JW, Baumann BC, Pachynski RK, Thorek DLJ. Beyond Average: α-Particle Distribution and Dose Heterogeneity in Bone Metastatic Prostate Cancer. J Nucl Med 2024; 65:245-251. [PMID: 38124163 PMCID: PMC10858382 DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.123.266571] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/22/2023] [Revised: 10/23/2023] [Indexed: 12/23/2023] Open
Abstract
α-particle emitters are emerging as a potent modality for disseminated cancer therapy because of their high linear energy transfer and localized absorbed dose profile. Despite great interest and pharmaceutical development, there is scant information on the distribution of these agents at the scale of the α-particle pathlength. We sought to determine the distribution of clinically approved [223Ra]RaCl2 in bone metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer at this resolution, for the first time to our knowledge, to inform activity distribution and dose at the near-cell scale. Methods: Biopsy specimens and blood were collected from 7 patients 24 h after administration. 223Ra activity in each sample was recorded, and the microstructure of biopsy specimens was analyzed by micro-CT. Quantitative autoradiography and histopathology were segmented and registered with an automated procedure. Activity distributions by tissue compartment and dosimetry calculations based on the MIRD formalism were performed. Results: We revealed the activity distribution differences across and within patient samples at the macro- and microscopic scales. Microdistribution analysis confirmed localized high-activity regions in a background of low-activity tissue. We evaluated heterogeneous α-particle emission distribution concentrated at bone-tissue interfaces and calculated spatially nonuniform absorbed-dose profiles. Conclusion: Primary patient data of radiopharmaceutical therapy distribution at the small scale revealed that 223Ra uptake is nonuniform. Dose estimates present both opportunities and challenges to enhance patient outcomes and are a first step toward personalized treatment approaches and improved understanding of α-particle radiopharmaceutical therapies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nadia Benabdallah
- Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University in St. Louis School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri
| | - Peng Lu
- Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University in St. Louis School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri
| | - Diane S Abou
- Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University in St. Louis School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri
| | - Hanwen Zhang
- Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University in St. Louis School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri
| | - David Ulmert
- Department of Molecular and Medical Pharmacology, UCLA, Los Angeles, California
- Division of Oncology and Pathology, Department of Clinical Sciences, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
| | - Robert F Hobbs
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Hiram A Gay
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Washington University in St. Louis School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri
| | - Brian W Simons
- Center for Comparative Medicine, Baylor University, Houston, Texas
| | - Muhammad A Saeed
- Department of Medicine, Washington University in St. Louis School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri
| | - Buck E Rogers
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Washington University in St. Louis School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri
| | - Abhinav K Jha
- Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University in St. Louis School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri
| | - Yuan-Chuan Tai
- Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University in St. Louis School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri
| | - Christopher D Malone
- Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University in St. Louis School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri
| | - Joseph E Ippolito
- Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University in St. Louis School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri
| | - Jeff Michalski
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Washington University in St. Louis School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri
| | - Jack W Jennings
- Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University in St. Louis School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri
| | - Brian C Baumann
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Washington University in St. Louis School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Springfield Clinic, Springfield, Illinois; and
| | - Russell K Pachynski
- Department of Medicine, Washington University in St. Louis School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri
| | - Daniel L J Thorek
- Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University in St. Louis School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri;
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri
- Oncologic Imaging Program, Siteman Cancer Center, Washington University in St. Louis School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Chiesa C, Sjogreen-Gleisner K, Walrand S, Strigari L, Flux G, Gear J, Stokke C, Gabina PM, Bernhardt P, Konijnenberg M. EANM dosimetry committee series on standard operational procedures: a unified methodology for 99mTc-MAA pre- and 90Y peri-therapy dosimetry in liver radioembolization with 90Y microspheres. EJNMMI Phys 2021; 8:77. [PMID: 34767102 PMCID: PMC8589932 DOI: 10.1186/s40658-021-00394-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 61] [Impact Index Per Article: 20.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/23/2020] [Accepted: 06/21/2021] [Indexed: 11/27/2022] Open
Abstract
The aim of this standard operational procedure is to standardize the methodology employed for the evaluation of pre- and post-treatment absorbed dose calculations in 90Y microsphere liver radioembolization. Basic assumptions include the permanent trapping of microspheres, the local energy deposition method for voxel dosimetry, and the patient-relative calibration method for activity quantification.The identity of 99mTc albumin macro-aggregates (MAA) and 90Y microsphere biodistribution is also assumed. The large observed discrepancies in some patients between 99mTc-MAA predictions and actual 90Y microsphere distributions for lesions is discussed. Absorbed dose predictions to whole non-tumoural liver are considered more reliable and the basic predictors of toxicity. Treatment planning based on mean absorbed dose delivered to the whole non-tumoural liver is advised, except in super-selective treatments.Given the potential mismatch between MAA simulation and actual therapy, absorbed doses should be calculated both pre- and post-therapy. Distinct evaluation between target tumours and non-tumoural tissue, including lungs in cases of lung shunt, are vital for proper optimization of therapy. Dosimetry should be performed first according to a mean absorbed dose approach, with an optional, but important, voxel level evaluation. Fully corrected 99mTc-MAA Single Photon Emission Computed Tomography (SPECT)/computed tomography (CT) and 90Y TOF PET/CT are regarded as optimal acquisition methodologies, but, for institutes where SPECT/CT is not available, non-attenuation corrected 99mTc-MAA SPECT may be used. This offers better planning quality than non dosimetric methods such as Body Surface Area (BSA) or mono-compartmental dosimetry. Quantitative 90Y bremsstrahlung SPECT can be used if dedicated correction methods are available.The proposed methodology is feasible with standard camera software and a spreadsheet. Available commercial or free software can help facilitate the process and improve calculation time.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carlo Chiesa
- Nuclear Medicine Unit, Foundation IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | | | - Stephan Walrand
- Nuclear Medicine, Molecular Imaging, Radiotherapy and Oncology Unit (MIRO), IECR, Université Catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Lidia Strigari
- Medical Physics Division, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Glenn Flux
- Joint Department of Physics, Royal Marsden Hospital & Institute of Cancer Research, Sutton, UK
| | - Jonathan Gear
- Joint Department of Physics, Royal Marsden Hospital & Institute of Cancer Research, Sutton, UK
| | - Caroline Stokke
- Department of Diagnostic Physics, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Pablo Minguez Gabina
- Department of Medical Physics and Radiation Protection, Gurutzeta/Cruces University Hospital, Barakaldo, Spain
| | - Peter Bernhardt
- Department of Radiation Physics, Institute of Clinical Science, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
- Department of Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Mark Konijnenberg
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Oguz S, Kucukaslan H, Topaloglu S, Ones T, Baltacioglu F, Cobanoglu U, Calik A. Is it Possible to Increase Survival of Patients with Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma? A Case Report. J Gastrointest Cancer 2021; 52:342-346. [PMID: 32617830 DOI: 10.1007/s12029-020-00446-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Sukru Oguz
- Faculty of Medicine, Department of Radiology, Karadeniz Technical University, Trabzon, Turkey
| | - Hakan Kucukaslan
- Faculty of Medicine, Department of Surgery, Karadeniz Technical University, Trabzon, Turkey
| | - Serdar Topaloglu
- Faculty of Medicine, Department of Surgery, Karadeniz Technical University, Trabzon, Turkey.
| | - Tunc Ones
- Faculty of Medicine, Department of Nuclear Medicine, Marmara University, İstanbul, Turkey
| | - Feyyaz Baltacioglu
- Faculty of Medicine, Department of Radiology, Marmara University, İstanbul, Turkey
| | - Umit Cobanoglu
- Faculty of Medicine, Department of Pathology, Karadeniz Technical University, Trabzon, Turkey
| | - Adnan Calik
- Faculty of Medicine, Department of Surgery, Karadeniz Technical University, Trabzon, Turkey
| |
Collapse
|