1
|
Abana CO, Damen PJ, van Rossum PS, Bravo PL, Wei X, Pollard-Larkin JM, Nitsch PL, Murphy MB, Hofstetter WL, Liao Z, Lin SH. Esophageal Cancer Outcomes After Definitive Chemotherapy With Intensity Modulated Proton Therapy. Int J Part Ther 2024; 11:100009. [PMID: 38757075 PMCID: PMC11095094 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpt.2024.100009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/22/2023] [Revised: 12/16/2023] [Accepted: 01/31/2024] [Indexed: 05/18/2024] Open
Abstract
Purpose The effectiveness of intensity-modulated proton therapy (IMPT) for esophageal cancer treated with definitive concurrent chemoradiation therapy remains inadequately explored. We investigated long-term outcomes and toxicity experienced by patients who received IMPT as part of definitive esophageal cancer treatment. Patients and Methods We retrospectively identified and analyzed 34 patients with locally advanced esophageal cancer who received IMPT with concurrent chemotherapy as a definitive treatment regimen at The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center from 2011 to 2021. The median IMPT dose was 50.4 GyRBE in 28 fractions; concurrent chemotherapy consisted of fluorouracil and/or taxane and/or platinum. Survival outcomes were determined by the Kaplan-Meier method, and toxicity was scored according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 4.0. Results The median age of all patients was 71.5 years. Most patients had stage III (cT3 cM0) adenocarcinoma of the lower esophagus. At a median follow-up time of 39 months, the 5-year overall survival rate was 41.1%; progression-free survival, 34.6%; local regional recurrence-free survival, 78.1%; and distant metastasis-free survival, 65.0%. Common acute chemoradiation therapy-related toxicities included hematologic toxicity, esophagitis (and late-onset), fatigue, weight loss, and nausea (and late-onset); grade 3 toxicity rates were 26.0% for hematologic, 18.0% for esophagitis and 9.0% for nausea. No patient had grade ≥3 wt loss or radiation pneumonitis, and no patients had pulmonary fibrosis or esophageal fistula. No grade ≥4 events were observed except for hematologic toxicity (lymphopenia) in 2 patients. Conclusion Long-term survival and toxicity were excellent after IMPT for locally advanced esophageal cancer treated definitively with concurrent chemoradiation therapy. When available, IMPT should be offered to such patients to minimize treatment-related cardiopulmonary toxicity without sacrificing outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chike O. Abana
- Department of Thoracic Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Pim J. Damen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Erasmus Medical Center Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Peter S. van Rossum
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Pablo Lopez Bravo
- Department of Thoracic Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Xiong Wei
- Department of Thoracic Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | | | - Paige L. Nitsch
- Department of Radiation Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Mariela Blum Murphy
- Department of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Wayne L. Hofstetter
- Department of Thoracic & Cardiovascular Surgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Zhongxing Liao
- Department of Thoracic Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Steven H. Lin
- Department of Thoracic Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Zhang L, Holmes JM, Liu Z, Vora SA, Sio TT, Vargas CE, Yu NY, Keole SR, Schild SE, Bues M, Li S, Liu T, Shen J, Wong WW, Liu W. Beam mask and sliding window-facilitated deep learning-based accurate and efficient dose prediction for pencil beam scanning proton therapy. Med Phys 2024; 51:1484-1498. [PMID: 37748037 DOI: 10.1002/mp.16758] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/18/2023] [Revised: 08/28/2023] [Accepted: 09/11/2023] [Indexed: 09/27/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Accurate and efficient dose calculation is essential for on-line adaptive planning in proton therapy. Deep learning (DL) has shown promising dose prediction results in photon therapy. However, there is a scarcity of DL-based dose prediction methods specifically designed for proton therapy. Successful dose prediction method for proton therapy should account for more challenging dose prediction problems in pencil beam scanning proton therapy (PBSPT) due to its sensitivity to heterogeneities. PURPOSE To develop a DL-based PBSPT dose prediction workflow with high accuracy and balanced complexity to support on-line adaptive proton therapy clinical decision and subsequent replanning. METHODS PBSPT plans of 103 prostate cancer patients (93 for training and the other 10 for independent testing) and 83 lung cancer patients (73 for training and the other 10 for independent testing) previously treated at our institution were included in the study, each with computed tomography scans (CTs), structure sets, and plan doses calculated by the in-house developed Monte-Carlo dose engine (considered as the ground truth in the model training and testing). For the ablation study, we designed three experiments corresponding to the following three methods: (1) Experiment 1, the conventional region of interest (ROI) (composed of targets and organs-at-risk [OARs]) method. (2) Experiment 2, the beam mask (generated by raytracing of proton beams) method to improve proton dose prediction. (3) Experiment 3, the sliding window method for the model to focus on local details to further improve proton dose prediction. A fully connected 3D-Unet was adopted as the backbone. Dose volume histogram (DVH) indices, 3D Gamma passing rates with a criterion of 3%/3 mm/10%, and dice coefficients for the structures enclosed by the iso-dose lines between the predicted and the ground truth doses were used as the evaluation metrics. The calculation time for each proton dose prediction was recorded to evaluate the method's efficiency. RESULTS Compared to the conventional ROI method, the beam mask method improved the agreement of DVH indices for both targets and OARs and the sliding window method further improved the agreement of the DVH indices (for lung cancer, CTV D98 absolute deviation: 0.74 ± 0.18 vs. 0.57 ± 0.21 vs. 0.54 ± 0.15 Gy[RBE], ROI vs. beam mask vs. sliding window methods, respectively). For the 3D Gamma passing rates in the target, OARs, and BODY (outside target and OARs), the beam mask method improved the passing rates in these regions and the sliding window method further improved them (for prostate cancer, targets: 96.93% ± 0.53% vs. 98.88% ± 0.49% vs. 99.97% ± 0.07%, BODY: 86.88% ± 0.74% vs. 93.21% ± 0.56% vs. 95.17% ± 0.59%). A similar trend was also observed for the dice coefficients. This trend was especially remarkable for relatively low prescription isodose lines (for lung cancer, 10% isodose line dice: 0.871 ± 0.027 vs. 0.911 ± 0.023 vs. 0.927 ± 0.017). The dose predictions for all the testing cases were completed within 0.25 s. CONCLUSIONS An accurate and efficient deep learning-augmented proton dose prediction framework has been developed for PBSPT, which can predict accurate dose distributions not only inside but also outside ROI efficiently. The framework can potentially further reduce the initial planning and adaptive replanning workload in PBSPT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lian Zhang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona, USA
| | - Jason M Holmes
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona, USA
| | - Zhengliang Liu
- School of Computing, University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia, USA
| | - Sujay A Vora
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona, USA
| | - Terence T Sio
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona, USA
| | - Carlos E Vargas
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona, USA
| | - Nathan Y Yu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona, USA
| | - Sameer R Keole
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona, USA
| | - Steven E Schild
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona, USA
| | - Martin Bues
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona, USA
| | - Sheng Li
- School of Data Science, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA
| | - Tianming Liu
- School of Computing, University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia, USA
| | - Jiajian Shen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona, USA
| | - William W Wong
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona, USA
| | - Wei Liu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Ding Y, Feng H, Yang Y, Holmes J, Liu Z, Liu D, Wong WW, Yu NY, Sio TT, Schild SE, Li B, Liu W. Deep-learning based fast and accurate 3D CT deformable image registration in lung cancer. Med Phys 2023; 50:6864-6880. [PMID: 37289193 PMCID: PMC10704004 DOI: 10.1002/mp.16548] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/26/2022] [Revised: 04/20/2023] [Accepted: 05/24/2023] [Indexed: 06/09/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Deformable Image Registration (DIR) is an essential technique required in many applications of radiation oncology. However, conventional DIR approaches typically take several minutes to register one pair of 3D CT images and the resulting deformable vector fields (DVFs) are only specific to the pair of images used, making it less appealing for clinical application. PURPOSE A deep-learning-based DIR method using CT images is proposed for lung cancer patients to address the common drawbacks of the conventional DIR approaches and in turn can accelerate the speed of related applications, such as contour propagation, dose deformation, adaptive radiotherapy (ART), etc. METHODS: A deep neural network based on VoxelMorph was developed to generate DVFs using CT images collected from 114 lung cancer patients. Two models were trained with the weighted mean absolute error (wMAE) loss and structural similarity index matrix (SSIM) loss (optional) (i.e., the MAE model and the M+S model). In total, 192 pairs of initial CT (iCT) and verification CT (vCT) were included as a training dataset and the other independent 10 pairs of CTs were included as a testing dataset. The vCTs usually were taken 2 weeks after the iCTs. The synthetic CTs (sCTs) were generated by warping the vCTs according to the DVFs generated by the pre-trained model. The image quality of the synthetic CTs was evaluated by measuring the similarity between the iCTs and the sCTs generated by the proposed methods and the conventional DIR approaches, respectively. Per-voxel absolute CT-number-difference volume histogram (CDVH) and MAE were used as the evaluation metrics. The time to generate the sCTs was also recorded and compared quantitatively. Contours were propagated using the derived DVFs and evaluated with SSIM. Forward dose calculations were done on the sCTs and the corresponding iCTs. Dose volume histograms (DVHs) were generated based on dose distributions on both iCTs and sCTs generated by two models, respectively. The clinically relevant DVH indices were derived for comparison. The resulted dose distributions were also compared using 3D Gamma analysis with thresholds of 3 mm/3%/10% and 2 mm/2%/10%, respectively. RESULTS The two models (wMAE and M+S) achieved a speed of 263.7±163 / 265.8±190 ms and a MAE of 13.15±3.8 / 17.52±5.8 HU for the testing dataset, respectively. The average SSIM scores of 0.987±0.006 and 0.988±0.004 were achieved by the two proposed models, respectively. For both models, CDVH of a typical patient showed that less than 5% of the voxels had a per-voxel absolute CT-number-difference larger than 55 HU. The dose distribution calculated based on a typical sCT showed differences of ≤2cGy[RBE] for clinical target volume (CTV) D95 and D5 , within ±0.06% for total lung V5 , ≤1.5cGy[RBE] for heart and esophagus Dmean , and ≤6cGy[RBE] for cord Dmax compared to the dose distribution calculated based on the iCT. The good average 3D Gamma passing rates (> 96% for 3 mm/3%/10% and > 94% for 2 mm/2%/10%, respectively) were also observed. CONCLUSION A deep neural network-based DIR approach was proposed and has been shown to be reasonably accurate and efficient to register the initial CTs and verification CTs in lung cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yuzhen Ding
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ 85054, USA
| | - Hongying Feng
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ 85054, USA
| | - Yunze Yang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ 85054, USA
| | - Jason Holmes
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ 85054, USA
| | - Zhengliang Liu
- Department of Computer Science, University of Georgia, Athens, GA 30602, USA
| | - David Liu
- Athens Academy, Athens, GA 30602, USA
| | - William W. Wong
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ 85054, USA
| | - Nathan Y. Yu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ 85054, USA
| | - Terence T. Sio
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ 85054, USA
| | - Steven E. Schild
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ 85054, USA
| | - Baoxin Li
- School of Computing and Augmented Intelligence, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona, USA 85281
| | - Wei Liu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ 85054, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Zhou P, Du Y, Zhang Y, Zhu M, Li T, Tian W, Wu T, Xiao Z. Efficacy and Safety in Proton Therapy and Photon Therapy for Patients With Esophageal Cancer: A Meta-Analysis. JAMA Netw Open 2023; 6:e2328136. [PMID: 37581887 PMCID: PMC10427943 DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.28136] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/24/2023] [Accepted: 06/29/2023] [Indexed: 08/16/2023] Open
Abstract
Importance Radiotherapy plays an important role in the treatment of esophageal cancer. Proton therapy has unique physical properties and higher relative biological effectiveness. However, whether proton therapy has greater benefit than photon therapy is still unclear. Objective To evaluate whether proton was associated with better efficacy and safety outcomes, including dosimetric, prognosis, and toxic effects outcomes, compared with photon therapy and to evaluate the efficacy and safety of proton therapy singly. Data Sources A systematic search of PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library, Web of Science, SinoMed, and China National Knowledge Infrastructure databases was conducted for articles published through November 25, 2021, and updated to March 25, 2023. Study Selection For the comparison of proton and photon therapy, studies including dosimetric, prognosis, and associated toxic effects outcomes were included. The separate evaluation of proton therapy evaluated the same metrics. Data Extraction and Synthesis Data on study design, individual characteristics, and outcomes were extracted. If I2 was greater than 50%, the random-effects model was selected. This meta-analysis is reported following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) reporting guideline. Main Outcomes and Measures The main outcomes were organs at risk (OARs) dosimetric outcomes, prognosis (overall survival [OS], progression-free survival [PFS], and objective response rate [ORR]), and radiation-related toxic effects. Results A total of 45 studies were included in the meta-analysis. For dosimetric analysis, proton therapy was associated with significantly reduced OARs dose. Meta-analysis showed that photon therapy was associated with poor OS (hazard ratio [HR], 1.31; 95% CI, 1.07-1.61; I2 = 11%), but no difference in PFS was observed. Subgroup analysis showed worse OS (HR, 1.42; 95% CI, 1.14-1.78; I2 = 34%) and PFS (HR, 1.48; 95% CI, 1.06-2.08; I2 = 7%) in the radical therapy group with photon therapy. The pathological complete response rate was similar between groups. Proton therapy was associated with significantly decreased grade 2 or higher radiation pneumonitis and pericardial effusion, and grade 4 or higher lymphocytopenia. Single-rate analysis of proton therapy found 89% OS and 65% PFS at 1 year, 71% OS and 56% PFS at 2 years, 63% OS and 48% PFS at 3 years, and 56% OS and 42% PFS at 5 years. The incidence of grade 2 or higher radiation esophagitis was 50%, grade 2 or higher radiation pneumonitis was 2%, grade 2 or higher pleural effusion was 4%, grade 2 or higher pericardial effusion was 3%, grade 3 or higher radiation esophagitis was 8%, and grade 4 or higher lymphocytopenia was 17%. Conclusions and Relevance In this meta-analysis, proton therapy was associated with reduced OARs doses and toxic effects and improved prognosis compared with photon therapy for esophageal cancer, but caution is warranted. In the future, these findings should be further validated in randomized clinical trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pixiao Zhou
- Department of Oncology, Changde Hospital, Xiangya School of Medicine, Central South University, Changde, China
| | - Yangfeng Du
- Department of Oncology, Changde Hospital, Xiangya School of Medicine, Central South University, Changde, China
| | - Ying Zhang
- The Second People’s Hospital of Yibin, Yibin, China
| | - Mei Zhu
- Department of Oncology, Changde Hospital, Xiangya School of Medicine, Central South University, Changde, China
| | - Ting Li
- Department of Oncology, Changde Hospital, Xiangya School of Medicine, Central South University, Changde, China
| | - Wei Tian
- Department of Oncology, Changde Hospital, Xiangya School of Medicine, Central South University, Changde, China
| | - Tao Wu
- Department of Oncology, Changde Hospital, Xiangya School of Medicine, Central South University, Changde, China
| | - Zemin Xiao
- Department of Oncology, Changde Hospital, Xiangya School of Medicine, Central South University, Changde, China
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Feng H, Holmes JM, Vora SA, Stoker JB, Bues M, Wong WW, Sio TS, Foote RL, Patel SH, Shen J, Liu W. Modelling small block aperture in an in-house developed GPU-accelerated Monte Carlo-based dose engine for pencil beam scanning proton therapy. ARXIV 2023:arXiv:2307.01416v1. [PMID: 37461414 PMCID: PMC10350098] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 07/22/2023]
Abstract
Purpose To enhance an in-house graphic-processing-unit (GPU) accelerated virtual particle (VP)-based Monte Carlo (MC) proton dose engine (VPMC) to model aperture blocks in both dose calculation and optimization for pencil beam scanning proton therapy (PBSPT)-based stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS). Methods and Materials A module to simulate VPs passing through patient-specific aperture blocks was developed and integrated in VPMC based on simulation results of realistic particles (primary protons and their secondaries). To validate the aperture block module, VPMC was first validated by an opensource MC code, MCsquare, in eight water phantom simulations with 3cm thick brass apertures: four were with aperture openings of 1, 2, 3, and 4cm without a range shifter, while the other four were with same aperture opening configurations with a range shifter of 45mm water equivalent thickness. Then, VPMC was benchmarked with MCsquare and RayStation MC for 10 patients with small targets (average volume 8.4 cc with range of 0.4 - 43.3 cc). Finally, 3 typical patients were selected for robust optimization with aperture blocks using VPMC. Results In the water phantoms, 3D gamma passing rate (2%/2mm/10%) between VPMC and MCsquare was 99.71±0.23%. In the patient geometries, 3D gamma passing rates (3%/2mm/10%) between VPMC/MCsquare and RayStation MC were 97.79±2.21%/97.78±1.97%, respectively. Meanwhile, the calculation time was drastically decreased from 112.45±114.08 seconds (MCsquare) to 8.20±6.42 seconds (VPMC) with the same statistical uncertainties of ~0.5%. The robustly optimized plans met all the dose-volume-constraints (DVCs) for the targets and OARs per our institutional protocols. The mean calculation time for 13 influence matrices in robust optimization by VPMC was 41.6 seconds and the subsequent on-the-fly "trial-and-error" optimization procedure took only 71.4 seconds on average for the selected three patients. Conclusion VPMC has been successfully enhanced to model aperture blocks in dose calculation and optimization for the PBSPT-based SRS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hongying Feng
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ 85054, USA
| | - Jason M. Holmes
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ 85054, USA
| | | | | | - Martin Bues
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ 85054, USA
| | | | - Terence S. Sio
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ 85054, USA
| | - Robert L. Foote
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55902, USA
| | - Samir H. Patel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ 85054, USA
| | - Jiajian Shen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ 85054, USA
| | - Wei Liu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ 85054, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Zhang L, Holmes JM, Liu Z, Vora SA, Sio TT, Vargas CE, Yu NY, Keole SR, Schild SE, Bues M, Li S, Liu T, Shen J, Wong WW, Liu W. Beam mask and sliding window-facilitated deep learning-based accurate and efficient dose prediction for pencil beam scanning proton therapy. ARXIV 2023:arXiv:2305.18572v1. [PMID: 37396612 PMCID: PMC10312803] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 07/04/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE To develop a DL-based PBSPT dose prediction workflow with high accuracy and balanced complexity to support on-line adaptive proton therapy clinical decision and subsequent replanning. METHODS PBSPT plans of 103 prostate cancer patients and 83 lung cancer patients previously treated at our institution were included in the study, each with CTs, structure sets, and plan doses calculated by the in-house developed Monte-Carlo dose engine. For the ablation study, we designed three experiments corresponding to the following three methods: 1) Experiment 1, the conventional region of interest (ROI) method. 2) Experiment 2, the beam mask (generated by raytracing of proton beams) method to improve proton dose prediction. 3) Experiment 3, the sliding window method for the model to focus on local details to further improve proton dose prediction. A fully connected 3D-Unet was adopted as the backbone. Dose volume histogram (DVH) indices, 3D Gamma passing rates, and dice coefficients for the structures enclosed by the iso-dose lines between the predicted and the ground truth doses were used as the evaluation metrics. The calculation time for each proton dose prediction was recorded to evaluate the method's efficiency. RESULTS Compared to the conventional ROI method, the beam mask method improved the agreement of DVH indices for both targets and OARs and the sliding window method further improved the agreement of the DVH indices. For the 3D Gamma passing rates in the target, OARs, and BODY (outside target and OARs), the beam mask method can improve the passing rates in these regions and the sliding window method further improved them. A similar trend was also observed for the dice coefficients. In fact, this trend was especially remarkable for relatively low prescription isodose lines. The dose predictions for all the testing cases were completed within 0.25s.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lian Zhang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ 85054, USA
| | - Jason M. Holmes
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ 85054, USA
| | - Zhengliang Liu
- Department of Computer Science, University of Georgia, Athens, GA 30602, USA
| | - Sujay A. Vora
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ 85054, USA
| | - Terence T. Sio
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ 85054, USA
| | - Carlos E. Vargas
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ 85054, USA
| | - Nathan Y. Yu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ 85054, USA
| | - Sameer R. Keole
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ 85054, USA
| | - Steven E. Schild
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ 85054, USA
| | - Martin Bues
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ 85054, USA
| | - Sheng Li
- Department of Data Science, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA 22903, USA
| | - Tianming Liu
- Department of Computer Science, University of Georgia, Athens, GA 30602, USA
| | - Jiajian Shen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ 85054, USA
| | - William W. Wong
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ 85054, USA
| | - Wei Liu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ 85054, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Ding Y, Feng H, Yang Y, Holmes J, Liu Z, Liu D, Wong WW, Yu NY, Sio TT, Schild SE, Li B, Liu W. Deep-Learning-based Fast and Accurate 3D CT Deformable Image Registration in Lung Cancer. ARXIV 2023:arXiv:2304.11135v1. [PMID: 37131881 PMCID: PMC10153353] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/04/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE In some proton therapy facilities, patient alignment relies on two 2D orthogonal kV images, taken at fixed, oblique angles, as no 3D on-the-bed imaging is available. The visibility of the tumor in kV images is limited since the patient's 3D anatomy is projected onto a 2D plane, especially when the tumor is behind high-density structures such as bones. This can lead to large patient setup errors. A solution is to reconstruct the 3D CT image from the kV images obtained at the treatment isocenter in the treatment position. METHODS An asymmetric autoencoder-like network built with vision-transformer blocks was developed. The data was collected from 1 head and neck patient: 2 orthogonal kV images (1024x1024 voxels), 1 3D CT with padding (512x512x512) acquired from the in-room CT-on-rails before kVs were taken and 2 digitally-reconstructed-radiograph (DRR) images (512x512) based on the CT. We resampled kV images every 8 voxels and DRR and CT every 4 voxels, thus formed a dataset consisting of 262,144 samples, in which the images have a dimension of 128 for each direction. In training, both kV and DRR images were utilized, and the encoder was encouraged to learn the jointed feature map from both kV and DRR images. In testing, only independent kV images were used. The full-size synthetic CT (sCT) was achieved by concatenating the sCTs generated by the model according to their spatial information. The image quality of the synthetic CT (sCT) was evaluated using mean absolute error (MAE) and per-voxel-absolute-CT-number-difference volume histogram (CDVH). RESULTS The model achieved a speed of 2.1s and a MAE of <40HU. The CDVH showed that <5% of the voxels had a per-voxel-absolute-CT-number-difference larger than 185 HU. CONCLUSION A patient-specific vision-transformer-based network was developed and shown to be accurate and efficient to reconstruct 3D CT images from kV images.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yuzhen Ding
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ 85054, USA
| | - Hongying Feng
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ 85054, USA
| | - Yunze Yang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ 85054, USA
| | - Jason Holmes
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ 85054, USA
| | - Zhengliang Liu
- Department of Computer Science, University of Georgia, Athens, GA 30602, USA
| | - David Liu
- Athens Academy, Athens, GA 30602, USA
| | - William W. Wong
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ 85054, USA
| | - Nathan Y. Yu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ 85054, USA
| | - Terence T. Sio
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ 85054, USA
| | - Steven E. Schild
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ 85054, USA
| | - Baoxin Li
- School of Computing and Augmented Intelligence, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona, USA 85281
| | - Wei Liu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ 85054, USA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Chen Z, Dominello MM, Joiner MC, Burmeister JW. Proton versus photon radiation therapy: A clinical review. Front Oncol 2023; 13:1133909. [PMID: 37064131 PMCID: PMC10091462 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1133909] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/29/2022] [Accepted: 03/13/2023] [Indexed: 03/31/2023] Open
Abstract
While proton radiation therapy offers substantially better dose distribution characteristics than photon radiation therapy in certain clinical applications, data demonstrating a quantifiable clinical advantage is still needed for many treatment sites. Unfortunately, the number of patients treated with proton radiation therapy is still comparatively small, in some part due to the lack of evidence of clear benefits over lower-cost photon-based treatments. This review is designed to present the comparative clinical outcomes between proton and photon therapies, and to provide an overview of the current state of knowledge regarding the effectiveness of proton radiation therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zhe Chen
- School of Medicine, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI, United States
- *Correspondence: Zhe Chen,
| | - Michael M. Dominello
- Karmanos Cancer Institute, Department of Oncology, Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, MI, United States
| | - Michael C. Joiner
- Karmanos Cancer Institute, Department of Oncology, Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, MI, United States
| | - Jay W. Burmeister
- Karmanos Cancer Institute, Department of Oncology, Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, MI, United States
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
McMillan MT, Kang M, Shepherd AF, Liu W, Lin L, Lin H, Simone CB. Stereotactic body proton therapy for non-small cell lung cancer: Clinical indications and recommendations. JOURNAL OF RADIOSURGERY AND SBRT 2023; 9:17-32. [PMID: 38029014 PMCID: PMC10681144] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/11/2023] [Accepted: 08/11/2023] [Indexed: 12/01/2023]
Abstract
Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) has emerged as a standard treatment approach for early-stage lung cancer and intrathoracic oligometastatic or oligoprogressive disease. While local control is often excellent with this modality when delivered with photon therapy, toxicities for select patients can be significant. Proton therapy offers a unique opportunity to widen the therapeutic window when treating patients with thoracic malignancies requiring or benefitting from ultra-high doses per fraction. Thoracic proton SBRT may be particularly beneficial in cases requiring dose escalation, for tumors >5 cm, for central or ultra-central tumors, for reirradiation, in patients with interstitial lung diseases, and when combining radiation with immunotherapy. These clinical indications are detailed, along with supporting literature and clinical recommendations. Other considerations, future directions and potential benefits of proton SBRT, including sparing lymphocytes, when delivered as intensity-modulated proton therapy or as FLASH, and for the treatment of locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer or in patients with homologous recombination repair deficiencies, are also discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matthew T. McMillan
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, Department of Radiation Oncology, New York, NY, USA
| | | | - Annemarie F. Shepherd
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, Department of Radiation Oncology, New York, NY, USA
- New York Proton Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Wei Liu
- Mayo Clinic, Department of Radiation Oncology, Phoenix, AZ, USA
| | - Liyong Lin
- Emory University, Department of Radiation Oncology, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Haibo Lin
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, Department of Radiation Oncology, New York, NY, USA
- New York Proton Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Charles B. Simone
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, Department of Radiation Oncology, New York, NY, USA
- New York Proton Center, New York, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Holmes J, Shen J, Patel SH, Wong WW, Foote RL, Bues M, Liu W. Collimating individual beamlets in pencil beam scanning proton therapy, a dosimetric investigation. Front Oncol 2022; 12:1031340. [PMID: 36439436 PMCID: PMC9692234 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.1031340] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/31/2022] [Accepted: 10/27/2022] [Indexed: 03/26/2024] Open
Abstract
The purpose of this work is to investigate collimating individual proton beamlets from a dosimetric perspective and to introduce a new device concept, the spot scanning aperture (SSA). The SSA consists of a thin aperture with a small cylindrical opening attached to a robotics system, which allows the aperture to follow and align with individual beamlets during spot delivery. Additionally, a range shifter is incorporated (source-side) for treating shallow depths. Since the SSA trims beamlets spot by spot, the patient-facing portion of the device only needs to be large enough to trim a single proton beamlet. The SSA has been modelled in an open-source Monte-Carlo-based dose engine (MCsquare) to characterize its dosimetric properties in water at depths between 0 and 10 cm while varying the following parameters: the aperture material, thickness, distance to the water phantom, distance between the aperture and attached range shifter, and the aperture opening radius. Overall, the SSA greatly reduced spot sizes for all the aperture opening radii that were tested (1 - 4 mm), especially in comparison with the extended range shifter (ranger shifter placed at 30 cm from patient); greater than 50% when placed less than 10 cm away from the patient at depths in water less than 50 mm. The peak to entrance dose ratio and linear energy transfer was found to depend on the thickness of the aperture and therefore the aperture material. Neutron production rates were also investigated and discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jason Holmes
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ, United States
| | - Jiajian Shen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ, United States
| | - Samir H. Patel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ, United States
| | - William W. Wong
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ, United States
| | - Robert L. Foote
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States
| | - Martin Bues
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ, United States
| | - Wei Liu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ, United States
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Yang Y, Patel SH, Bridhikitti J, Wong WW, Halyard MY, McGee LA, Rwigema JCM, Schild SE, Vora SA, Liu T, Bues M, Fatyga M, Foote RL, Liu W. Exploratory study of seed spots analysis to characterize dose and linear energy transfer effect in adverse event initialization of pencil beam scanning proton therapy. Med Phys 2022; 49:6237-6252. [PMID: 35820062 DOI: 10.1002/mp.15859] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/07/2022] [Revised: 06/20/2022] [Accepted: 07/06/2022] [Indexed: 11/11/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Both dose and linear-energy-transfer (LET) could play a substantial role in adverse event (AE) initialization of cancer patients treated with pencil-beam-scanning proton therapy (PBS). However, not all the voxels within the AE regions are directly induced from the dose and LET effect. It is important to study the synergistic effect of dose and LET in AE initialization by only including a subset of voxels that are dosimetrically important. PURPOSE To perform exploratory investigation of the dose and LET effects upon AE initialization in PBS using seed spots analysis. METHODS 113 head and neck (H&N) cancer patients receiving curative PBS were included. Among them, 20 patients experienced unanticipated CTCAEv4.0 grade≥3 AEs (AE group) and 93 patients did not (control group). Within the AE group, 13 AE patients were included in the seed spot analysis to derive the descriptive features of AE initialization and the remaining 7 mandible osteoradionecrosis patients and 93 control patients were used to derive the feature-based volume constraint of mandible osteoradionecrosis. The AE regions were contoured and the corresponding dose-LET volume histograms (DLVHs) of AE regions were generated for all patients in the AE group. We selected high LET voxels (the highest 5% of each dose bin) with a range of moderate to high dose (≥∼40 Gy[RBE]) as critical voxels. Critical voxels which were contiguous with each other were grouped into clusters. Each cluster was considered as a potential independent seed spot for AE initialization. Seed spots were displayed in a 2D dose-LET plane based on their mean dose and LET to derive the descriptive features of AE initialization. A volume constraint of mandible osteoradionecrosis was then established based on the extracted features using a receiver operating characteristic curve. RESULTS The product of dose and LET (xBD) was found to be a descriptive feature of seed spots leading to AE initialization in this preliminary study. The derived xBD volume constraint for mandible osteoradionecrosis showed good performance with an area-under-curve of 0.87 (sensitivity of 0.714 and specificity of 0.807 in the leave-one-out cross validation) for the very limited patient data included in this study. CONCLUSION Our exploratory study showed that both dose and LET were observed to be important in AE initializations. The derived xBD volume constraint could predict mandible osteoradionecrosis reasonably well in the very limited H&N cancer patient data treated with PBS included in this study. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yunze Yang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic Arizona, Phoenix, Arizona, USA
| | - Samir H Patel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic Arizona, Phoenix, Arizona, USA
| | - Jidapa Bridhikitti
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic Rochester, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - William W Wong
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic Arizona, Phoenix, Arizona, USA
| | - Michele Y Halyard
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic Arizona, Phoenix, Arizona, USA
| | - Lisa A McGee
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic Arizona, Phoenix, Arizona, USA
| | | | - Steven E Schild
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic Arizona, Phoenix, Arizona, USA
| | - Sujay A Vora
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic Arizona, Phoenix, Arizona, USA
| | - Tianming Liu
- Department of Computer Science, the University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia, USA
| | - Martin Bues
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic Arizona, Phoenix, Arizona, USA
| | - Mirek Fatyga
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic Arizona, Phoenix, Arizona, USA
| | - Robert L Foote
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic Rochester, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Wei Liu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic Arizona, Phoenix, Arizona, USA
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Kobeissi JM, Simone CB, Hilal L, Wu AJ, Lin H, Crane CH, Hajj C. Proton Therapy in the Management of Luminal Gastrointestinal Cancers: Esophagus, Stomach, and Anorectum. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:cancers14122877. [PMID: 35740544 PMCID: PMC9221464 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14122877] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/30/2022] [Revised: 05/28/2022] [Accepted: 06/07/2022] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary Radiation treatment plays a major role in the management of luminal gastrointestinal cancers, mainly esophageal and anorectal cancers. There is a growing interest in the application of protons for gastrointestinal cancers, mainly owing to its dosimetric characteristics in decreasing dose to nearby organs at risk. We present here an up-to-date comprehensive review of the dosimetric and clinical literature on the use of proton therapy in the management of luminal gastrointestinal cancers. Abstract While the role of proton therapy in gastric cancer is marginal, its role in esophageal and anorectal cancers is expanding. In esophageal cancer, protons are superior in sparing the organs at risk, as shown by multiple dosimetric studies. Literature is conflicting regarding clinical significance, but the preponderance of evidence suggests that protons yield similar or improved oncologic outcomes to photons at a decreased toxicity cost. Similarly, protons have improved sparing of the organs at risk in anorectal cancers, but clinical data is much more limited to date, and toxicity benefits have not yet been shown clinically. Large, randomized trials are currently underway for both disease sites.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jana M. Kobeissi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, School of Medicine, American University of Beirut Medical Center, Beirut 1007, Lebanon; (J.M.K.); (L.H.)
| | - Charles B. Simone
- Department of Radiation Oncology, New York Proton Center, New York, NY 10035, USA; (C.B.S.II); (H.L.)
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10027, USA; (A.J.W.); (C.H.C.)
| | - Lara Hilal
- Department of Radiation Oncology, School of Medicine, American University of Beirut Medical Center, Beirut 1007, Lebanon; (J.M.K.); (L.H.)
| | - Abraham J. Wu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10027, USA; (A.J.W.); (C.H.C.)
| | - Haibo Lin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, New York Proton Center, New York, NY 10035, USA; (C.B.S.II); (H.L.)
| | - Christopher H. Crane
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10027, USA; (A.J.W.); (C.H.C.)
| | - Carla Hajj
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10027, USA; (A.J.W.); (C.H.C.)
- Correspondence:
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Oonsiri S, Kitpanit S, Kannarunimit D, Chakkabat C, Lertbutsayanukul C, Prayongrat A. Comparison of intensity modulated proton therapy beam configurations for treating thoracic esophageal cancer. Phys Imaging Radiat Oncol 2022; 22:51-56. [PMID: 35514527 PMCID: PMC9065423 DOI: 10.1016/j.phro.2022.04.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/07/2021] [Revised: 04/10/2022] [Accepted: 04/20/2022] [Indexed: 01/19/2023] Open
Abstract
Dosimetric benefit of proton over x-ray treatment for thoracic esophageal cancer. Reduction of pulmonary and cardiac toxicity by proton therapy. Intensity modulated proton therapy beam configurations designed by tumor location.
Background and purpose Specific proton-beam configurations are needed to spare organs at risk (OARs), including lungs, heart, and spinal cord, when treating esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) in the thoracic region. This study aimed to propose new intensity-modulated proton therapy (IMPT) beam configurations and to demonstrate the benefit of IMPT compared with intensity-modulated x-ray therapy (IMXT) for treating ESCC. Material and methods IMPT plans with three different beam angle configurations were generated on CT datasets of 25 ESCC patients that were treated with IMXT. The IMPT beam designs were two commonly-used beam configurations (anteroposterior and posterior oblique) and a recently proposed beam configuration (anterosuperior with posteroinferior). The target doses were 50–54 Gy(RBE) and 60–64 Gy(RBE) to the low-risk and high-risk target volumes, respectively. Robust optimization was applied for the IMPT plans. The differences in the dose-volume parameters between the IMXT and IMPT plans were compared. Results With target coverage comparable to standard IMXT, IMPT had significantly lower mean doses to the OARs. IMPT with an anteroposterior opposing beam generated the lowest lung dose (mean = 7.1 Gy(RBE), V20 = 14.1%) and the anterosuperior with posteroinferior beam resulted in the lowest heart dose (mean = 12.8 Gy(RBE), V30 = 15.7%) and liver dose (mean = 3.9 Gy(RBE), V30 = 5.9%). For the subgroup of patients with an inferior tumor location (PTVs overlapping a part of the contoured heart), the novel beam demonstrated the optimal OARs sparing. Conclusion Compared with IMXT, the IMPT plans significantly reduced the radiation dose to the surrounding organs when treating ESCC. IMPT beam configuration selection depends on the tumor location relative to the heart.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | - Anussara Prayongrat
- Corresponding author at: 1873 Rama IV Road, Pathumwan District, Bangkok 10300, Thailand.
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Dose-volume comparison of intensity modulated proton therapy and volumetric modulated arc therapy for cervical esophageal cancer. Med Dosim 2022; 47:216-221. [PMID: 35346554 DOI: 10.1016/j.meddos.2022.02.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/07/2021] [Revised: 02/18/2022] [Accepted: 02/25/2022] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
Abstract
Proton therapy for cervical esophageal cancer has many issues to be considered, such as the physiological curvature of the spine and the large range change from the neck to the trunk. We clarified the dosimetric characteristics of intensity modulated proton therapy (IMPT) for cervical esophageal cancer by comparing with volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT). Ten patients with cervical esophageal cancer were retrospectively planned for VMAT, 2-field IMPT (2F-IMPT), and 3-field IMPT (3F-IMPT). All plans were optimized to reach clinically acceptable levels. For planning target volume (PTV) coverage, 95% of the PTV should be covered by 95% of the prescription dose, unless the spinal cord limit is violated. The organs at risk included the lung, spinal cord, larynx, skin, and whole body. The prescription dose was 60 Gy relative biological effectiveness (RBE) in 30 fractions to the PTV. We compared the results according to dose-volume metrics. Significant dose reductions were achieved at lung doses, especially at low dose volumes of 20 Gy RBE or less in IMPT plans compared with VMAT plans (p < 0.05). Although the spinal cord PRV was below the tolerance level, the results were also significantly higher in VMAT plans than in IMPT plans (p < 0.001). Spinal cord PRV Dmean was significantly higher in 3F-IMPT than in 2F-IMPT (p < 0.001). In addition, it was confirmed that the integral whole body dose can be dramatically reduced in IMPT plans compared with VMAT plans. Both of 2F-IMPT and 3F-IMPT could effectively reduce spinal cord dose, as well as low integral whole body dose to a certain extent, while maintaining similar target coverage compared to VMAT. IMPT could be a promising treatment technique for patients with cervical esophageal cancer.
Collapse
|
15
|
Lu LS, Wu YW, Chang JTC, Chang WT, Chao TH, Chen HHW, Chen YJ, Cheng KH, Hsu WL, Hung CL, Kuo SH, Liang JA, Lin HJ, Liu PY, Liu WS, Liu YW, Shueng PW, Wang CY, Hou CJY, Chiou JF. Risk Management for Radiation-Induced Cardiovascular Disease (RICVD): The 2022 Consensus Statement of the Taiwan Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology (TASTRO) and Taiwan Society of Cardiology (TSOC). ACTA CARDIOLOGICA SINICA 2022; 38:1-12. [PMID: 35068877 PMCID: PMC8743478 DOI: 10.6515/acs.202201_38(1).20211122a] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/11/2021] [Accepted: 11/22/2021] [Indexed: 01/24/2023]
Abstract
Advances in cancer management have significantly improved survival in patients with cancers. Cardiovascular complications of cancer treatment are becoming significant competing causes of death in these patients. Radiotherapy is an indispensable component of cancer treatment, and irradiation of the heart and vasculature during cancer radiotherapy is now recognized as a new risk factor for cardiovascular diseases. It is important to involve multidisciplinary expertise and provide practical recommendations to promote awareness, recognize risks, and provide adequate interventions without jeopardizing cancer control. In this consensus paper, experts from the Taiwan Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology and Taiwan Society of Cardiology provide a focused update on the clinical practice for risk stratification and management of radiation-induced cardiovascular disease (RICVD). We believe that implementing RICVD care under a collaborative cardio-oncology program will significantly improve cancer treatment outcomes and will facilitate high quality clinical investigations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Long-Sheng Lu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Taipei Medical University Hospital, Taipei
| | - Yen-Wen Wu
- Cardiovascular Medical Center, Far Eastern Memorial Hospital, New Taipei City
| | - Joseph Tung-Chieh Chang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital and Chang Gung University, Taoyuan
| | - Wei-Ting Chang
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Chi-Mei Medical Center
| | - Ting-Hsing Chao
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, National Cheng Kung University College of Medicine and Hospital
| | - Helen Hai-Wen Chen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cheng Kung University Hospital, Tainan
| | - Yu-Jen Chen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, MacKay Memorial Hospital, Taipei
| | - Kai-Hung Cheng
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, E-Da Cancer Hospital, Kaohsiung
| | - Wen-Lin Hsu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hualien Tzu Chi Hospital, Buddhist Tzu Chi Medical Foundation, Hualien
| | - Chung-Lieh Hung
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, MacKay Memorial Hospital
| | - Sung-Hsin Kuo
- Division of Radiation Oncology, Department of Oncology, National Taiwan University Hospital and National Taiwan University College of Medicine, Taipei
| | - Ji-An Liang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, China Medical University Hospital, Taichung
| | - Hung-Ju Lin
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei
| | - Ping-Yen Liu
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, National Cheng Kung University Hospital, College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan
| | - Wen-Shan Liu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Kaohsiung Veterans General Hospital, Kaohsiung
| | - Yen-Wen Liu
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, National Cheng Kung University Hospital, College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan
| | - Pei-Wei Shueng
- Division of Radiation Oncology, Department of Radiology, Far Eastern Memorial Hospital, New Taipei City
| | - Chao-Yung Wang
- Division of Cardiology, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Linkou Medical Center, Taoyuan
| | | | - Jeng-Fong Chiou
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Taipei Medical University Hospital, Taipei
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Wang X, Hobbs B, Gandhi SJ, Muijs CT, Langendijk JA, Lin SH. Current status and application of proton therapy for esophageal cancer. Radiother Oncol 2021; 164:27-36. [PMID: 34534613 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2021.09.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/10/2020] [Revised: 08/11/2021] [Accepted: 09/07/2021] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
Esophageal cancer remains one of the leading causes of death from cancer across the world despite advances in multimodality therapy. Although early-stage disease can often be treated surgically, the current state of the art for locally advanced disease is concurrent chemoradiation, followed by surgery whenever possible. The uniform midline tumor location puts a strong importance on the need for precise delivery of radiation that would minimize dose to the heart and lungs, and the biophysical properties of proton beam makes this modality potential ideal for esophageal cancer treatment. This review covers the current state of knowledge of proton therapy for esophageal cancer, focusing on published retrospective single- and multi-institutional clinical studies, and emerging data from prospective clinical trials, that support the benefit of protons vs photon-based radiation in reducing postoperative complications, cardiac toxicity, and severe radiation induced immune suppression, which may improve survival outcomes for patients. In addition, we discuss the incorporation of immunotherapy to the curative management of esophageal cancers in the not-too-distant future. However, there is still a lack of high-level evidence to support proton therapy in the treatment of esophageal cancer, and proton therapy has its limitations in clinical application. It is expected to see the results of future large-scale randomized clinical trials and the continuous improvement of proton radiotherapy technology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xin Wang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, USA; Department of Radiation Oncology, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, China
| | - Brian Hobbs
- Department of Population Health, University of Texas, Austin, USA
| | - Saumil J Gandhi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, USA
| | - Christina T Muijs
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Johannes A Langendijk
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Steven H Lin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Feng H, Shan J, Ashman JB, Rule WG, Bhangoo RS, Yu NY, Chiang J, Fatyga M, Wong WW, Schild SE, Sio TT, Liu W. Technical Note: 4D robust optimization in small spot intensity-modulated proton therapy (IMPT) for distal esophageal carcinoma. Med Phys 2021; 48:4636-4647. [PMID: 34058026 DOI: 10.1002/mp.15003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/21/2020] [Revised: 05/18/2021] [Accepted: 05/19/2021] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To compare the dosimetric performances of small-spot three-dimensional (3D) and four-dimensional (4D) robustly optimized intensity-modulated proton (IMPT) plans in the presence of uncertainties and interplay effect simultaneously for distal esophageal carcinoma. METHOD AND MATERIALS Thirteen (13) patients were selected and re-planned with small-spot ( σ ~ 2-6 mm) 3D and 4D robust optimization in IMPT, respectively. The internal clinical target volumes (CTVhigh3d , CTVlow3d ) were used in 3D robust optimization. Different CTVs (CTVhigh4d , CTVlow4d ) were generated by subtracting an inner margin of the motion amplitudes in three cardinal directions from the internal CTVs and used in 4D robust optimization. All patients were prescribed the same dose to CTVs (50 Gy[RBE] for CTVhigh3d /CTVhigh4d and 45 Gy[RBE] for CTVlow3d /CTVlow4d ). Dose-volume histogram (DVH) indices were calculated to assess plan quality. Comprehensive plan robustness evaluations that consisted of 300 perturbed scenarios (10 different motion patterns to consider irregular motion (sampled from a Gaussian distribution) and 30 different uncertainties scenarios (sampled from a 4D uniform distribution) combined), were performed to quantify robustness to uncertainties and interplay effect simultaneously. Wilcoxon signed-rank test was used for statistical analysis. RESULTS Compared to 3D robustly optimized plans, 4D robustly optimized plans had statistically improved target coverage and better sparing of lungs and heart (heart Dmean , P = 0.001; heart V30Gy[RBE] , P = 0.001) in the nominal scenario. 4D robustly optimized plans had better robustness in target dose coverage (CTVhigh4d V100% , P = 0.002) and the protection of lungs and heart (heart Dmean , P = 0.001; heart V30Gy[RBE] , P = 0.001) when uncertainties and interplay effect were considered simultaneously. CONCLUSIONS Even with small spots in IMPT, 4D robust optimization outperformed 3D robust optimization in terms of normal tissue protection and robustness to uncertainties and interplay effect simultaneously. Our findings support the use of 4D robust optimization to treat distal esophageal carcinoma with small spots in IMPT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hongying Feng
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ, 85054, USA
| | - Jie Shan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ, 85054, USA
| | - Jonathan B Ashman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ, 85054, USA
| | - William G Rule
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ, 85054, USA
| | - Ronik S Bhangoo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ, 85054, USA
| | - Nathan Y Yu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ, 85054, USA
| | - Jennifer Chiang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ, 85054, USA
| | - Mirek Fatyga
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ, 85054, USA
| | - William W Wong
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ, 85054, USA
| | - Steven E Schild
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ, 85054, USA
| | - Terence T Sio
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ, 85054, USA
| | - Wei Liu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ, 85054, USA
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Nicholas O, Prosser S, Mortensen HR, Radhakrishna G, Hawkins MA, Gwynne SH. The Promise of Proton Beam Therapy for Oesophageal Cancer: A Systematic Review of Dosimetric and Clinical Outcomes. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol) 2021; 33:e339-e358. [PMID: 33931290 DOI: 10.1016/j.clon.2021.04.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/01/2021] [Revised: 03/08/2021] [Accepted: 04/13/2021] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
AIMS Due to its physical advantages over photon radiotherapy, proton beam therapy (PBT) has the potential to improve outcomes from oesophageal cancer. However, for many tumour sites, high-quality evidence supporting PBT use is limited. We carried out a systematic review of published literature of PBT in oesophageal cancer to ascertain potential benefits of this technology and to gauge the current state-of-the-art. We considered if further evaluation of this technology in oesophageal cancer is desirable. MATERIALS AND METHODS A systematic literature search of Medline, Embase, Cochrane Library and Web of Science using structured search terms was carried out. Inclusion criteria included non-metastatic cancer, full articles and English language studies only. Articles deliberating technical aspects of PBT planning or delivery were excluded to maintain a clinical focus. Studies were divided into two sections: dosimetric and clinical studies; qualitatively synthesised. RESULTS In total, 467 records were screened, with 32 included for final qualitative synthesis. This included two prospective studies with the rest based on retrospective data. There was heterogeneity in treatment protocols, including treatment intent (neoadjuvant or definitive), dose, fractionation and chemotherapy used. Compared with photon radiotherapy, PBT seemed to reduce dose to organs at risk, especially lung and heart, although not for all reported parameters. Toxicity outcomes, including postoperative complications, were reduced compared with photon radiotherapy. Survival outcomes were reported to be at least comparable with photon radiotherapy. CONCLUSION There is a paucity of high-quality evidence supporting PBT use in oesophageal cancer. Wide variation in intent and treatment protocols means that the role and 'gold-standard' treatment protocol are yet to be defined. Current literature suggests significant benefit in terms of toxicity reduction, especially in the postoperative period, with comparable survival outcomes. PBT in oesophageal cancer holds significant promise for improving patient outcomes but requires robust systematic evaluation in prospective studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- O Nicholas
- South West Wales Cancer Centre, Swansea, UK; Swansea University Medical School, Swansea, UK.
| | - S Prosser
- South West Wales Cancer Centre, Swansea, UK
| | - H R Mortensen
- The Danish Centre for Particle Therapy, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | | | - M A Hawkins
- University College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - S H Gwynne
- South West Wales Cancer Centre, Swansea, UK; Swansea University Medical School, Swansea, UK
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Cummings D, Wong J, Palm R, Hoffe S, Almhanna K, Vignesh S. Epidemiology, Diagnosis, Staging and Multimodal Therapy of Esophageal and Gastric Tumors. Cancers (Basel) 2021; 13:582. [PMID: 33540736 PMCID: PMC7867245 DOI: 10.3390/cancers13030582] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/16/2020] [Revised: 01/14/2021] [Accepted: 01/25/2021] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Gastric and esophageal tumors are diverse neoplasms that involve mucosal and submucosal tissue layers and include squamous cell carcinomas, adenocarcinomas, spindle cell neoplasms, neuroendocrine tumors, marginal B cell lymphomas, along with less common tumors. The worldwide burden of esophageal and gastric malignancies is significant, with esophageal and gastric cancer representing the ninth and fifth most common cancers, respectively. The approach to diagnosis and staging of these lesions is multimodal and includes a combination of gastrointestinal endoscopy, endoscopic ultrasound, and cross-sectional imaging. Likewise, therapy is multidisciplinary and combines therapeutic endoscopy, surgery, radiotherapy, and systemic chemotherapeutic tools. Future directions for diagnosis of esophageal and gastric malignancies are evolving rapidly and will involve advances in endoscopic and endosonographic techniques including tethered capsules, optical coherence tomography, along with targeted cytologic and serological analyses.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Donelle Cummings
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, New York Medical College, New York City Health and Hospitals Corporation-Metropolitan Hospital Center, 1901 First Avenue, New York, NY 10029, USA;
| | - Joyce Wong
- Division of Surgery, Mid Atlantic Kaiser Permanente, 700 2nd St. NE, 6th Floor, Washington, DC 20002, USA;
| | - Russell Palm
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center, 12902 USF Magnolia Drive, Tampa, FL 33612, USA; (R.P.); (S.H.)
| | - Sarah Hoffe
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center, 12902 USF Magnolia Drive, Tampa, FL 33612, USA; (R.P.); (S.H.)
| | - Khaldoun Almhanna
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Lifespan Cancer Institute, Rhode Island Hospital, The Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, 593 Eddy St, George 312, Providence, RI 02903, USA;
| | - Shivakumar Vignesh
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, SUNY Downstate Health Sciences University, MSC 1196, 450 Clarkson Avenue, Brooklyn, NY 11203, USA
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Feng H, Sio TT, Rule WG, Bhangoo RS, Lara P, Patrick CL, Korte S, Fatyga M, Wong WW, Schild SE, Ashman JB, Liu W. Beam angle comparison for distal esophageal carcinoma patients treated with intensity-modulated proton therapy. J Appl Clin Med Phys 2020; 21:141-152. [PMID: 33058523 PMCID: PMC7700921 DOI: 10.1002/acm2.13049] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/28/2020] [Revised: 09/03/2020] [Accepted: 09/10/2020] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose To compare the dosimetric performances of intensity‐modulated proton therapy (IMPT) plans generated with two different beam angle configurations (the Right–Left oblique posterior beams and the Superior–Inferior oblique posterior beams) for the treatment of distal esophageal carcinoma in the presence of uncertainties and interplay effect. Methods and Materials Twenty patients’ IMPT plans were retrospectively selected, with 10 patients treated with the R‐L oblique posterior beams (Group R‐L) and the other 10 patients treated with the S‐I oblique posterior beams (Group S‐I). Patients in both groups were matched by their clinical target volumes (CTVs—high and low dose levels) and respiratory motion amplitudes. Dose‐volume‐histogram (DVH) indices were used to assess plan quality. DVH bandwidth was calculated to evaluate plan robustness. Interplay effect was quantified using four‐dimensional (4D) dynamic dose calculation with random respiratory starting phase of each fraction. Normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) for heart, liver, and lung was calculated, respectively, to estimate the clinical outcomes. Wilcoxon signed‐rank test was used for statistical comparison between the two groups. Results Compared with plans in Group R‐L, plans in Group S‐I resulted in significantly lower liver Dmean and lung V30Gy[RBE] with slightly higher but clinically acceptable spinal cord Dmax. Similar plan robustness was observed between the two groups. When interplay effect was considered, plans in Group S‐I performed statistically better for heart Dmean and V30Gy[RBE], lung Dmean and V5Gy[RBE], and liver Dmean, with slightly increased but clinically acceptable spinal cord Dmax. NTCP for liver was significantly better in Group S‐I. Conclusions IMPT plans in Group S‐I have better sparing of liver, heart, and lungs at the slight cost of spinal cord maximum dose protection, and are more interplay‐effect resilient compared to IMPT plans in Group R‐L. Our study supports the routine use of the S‐I oblique posterior beams for the treatments of distal esophageal carcinoma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hongying Feng
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ, USA
| | - Terence T Sio
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ, USA
| | - William G Rule
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ, USA
| | - Ronik S Bhangoo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ, USA
| | - Pedro Lara
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ, USA
| | | | - Shawn Korte
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ, USA
| | - Mirek Fatyga
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ, USA
| | - William W Wong
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ, USA
| | - Steven E Schild
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ, USA
| | | | - Wei Liu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ, USA
| |
Collapse
|