1
|
Lavergne C, Youssef A, Niglas M, Humphreys DN, Youssef Y. Outcomes from a single institution cohort of 248 patients with stage I-III esophageal cancer treated with radiotherapy: Comparison of younger and older populations. Tech Innov Patient Support Radiat Oncol 2024; 31:100260. [PMID: 39070540 PMCID: PMC11278076 DOI: 10.1016/j.tipsro.2024.100260] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/11/2024] [Revised: 06/07/2024] [Accepted: 06/28/2024] [Indexed: 07/30/2024] Open
Abstract
Outcomes for patients receiving radiotherapy (RT) for non-metastatic esophageal cancer at a single institution were assessed, as well as the impact of factors including age and intensity modulated RT (IMRT) planning on patient outcomes. A retrospective cohort of patients treated with RT for stage I-III esophageal cancer between 2010 and 2018 was identified. Among 248 identified patients, 28 % identified as older (≥75 years of age). Other than histology, there were no other statistically significant differences in patient and tumour characteristics between the younger and older populations. Treatments varied between the two age groups, with significantly less older patients completing trimodality treatments (17 % vs 58 %). Median overall survival (M-OS) and progression-free survival (M-PFS) were 20 months and 12 months for all patients and 40 months and 26 months for trimodality patients, respectively. In the older patients, the M-OS improved from 13 months for all to 34 months for trimodality patients; and M-PFS from 10 months to 16 months. On multivariate analysis, the use of trimodality therapy showed improved OS (HR 0.26, p < 0.001). In the non-surgical older patient group, significantly better survival was seen in patients who had a heart V30Gy under 46 %. There was no significant difference in M-OS in patients planned with IMRT compared with 3D-conformal RT. Clinical outcomes in the treatment of esophageal cancer vary significantly by treatment approach, with the most favourable results in those receiving trimodality therapy. Among older patients deemed fit after assessment by the multidisciplinary team for trimodality treatments, the M-OS is comparable to the younger patient group.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carrie Lavergne
- R.S. McLaughlin Durham Regional Cancer Centre, Lakeridge Health Oshawa, Oshawa, Ontario L1G 2B9, Canada
| | - Andrew Youssef
- Institute of Medical Science, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario M5S 1A8, Canada
| | - Mark Niglas
- R.S. McLaughlin Durham Regional Cancer Centre, Lakeridge Health Oshawa, Oshawa, Ontario L1G 2B9, Canada
- Queen’s University, Department of Oncology, Kingston, Ontario, Canada
| | - Deanna Ng Humphreys
- R.S. McLaughlin Durham Regional Cancer Centre, Lakeridge Health Oshawa, Oshawa, Ontario L1G 2B9, Canada
| | - Youssef Youssef
- R.S. McLaughlin Durham Regional Cancer Centre, Lakeridge Health Oshawa, Oshawa, Ontario L1G 2B9, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
van der Poort EKJ, van Holstein Y, Slingerland M, Trompet S, van den Bos F, Portielje JEA, Steyerberg EW, van den Akker-van Marle ME, Bos WJW, Mooijaart SP, van den Hout WB. Allocation and value of curative oncological treatment in frail and fit older patients with esophageal cancer: An observational cohort study. J Geriatr Oncol 2024:102046. [PMID: 39138114 DOI: 10.1016/j.jgo.2024.102046] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/22/2024] [Revised: 05/14/2024] [Accepted: 08/06/2024] [Indexed: 08/15/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The Value-Based Health Care (VBHC) model of care provides insights into patient characteristics, outcomes, and costs of care delivery that help clinicians counsel patients. This study compares the allocation and value of curative oncological treatment in frail and fit older patients with esophageal cancer in a dedicated VBHC pathway. MATERIALS AND METHODS Data was collected from patients with primary esophageal cancer without distant metastases, aged 70 years or older, and treated at a Dutch tertiary care hospital between 2015 and 2019. Geriatric assessment (GA) was performed. Outcomes included treatment discontinuation, mortality, quality of life (QoL), and physical functioning over a one-year period. Direct hospital costs were estimated using activity-based costing. RESULTS In this study, 89 patients were included with mean age 75 years. Of 56 patients completing GA, 19 were classified as frail and 37 as fit. For frail patients, the treatment plan was chemoradiotherapy and surgery (CRT&S) in 68% (13/19) and definitive chemoradiotherapy (dCRT) in 32% (6/19); for fit patients, CRT&S in 84% (31/37) and dCRT in 16% (6/37). Frail patients discontinued chemotherapy more often than fit patients (26% (5/19) vs 11% (4/37), p = 0.03) and reported lower QoL after six months (mean 0.58 [standard deviation (SD) 0.35] vs 0.88 [0.25], p < 0.05). After one year, 11% of frail and 30% of fit patients reported no decline in physical functioning and QoL and survived. Frail and fit patients had comparable mean direct hospital costs (€24 K [SD €13 K] vs €23 K [SD €8 K], p = 0.82). DISCUSSION The value of curative oncological treatment was lower for frail than for fit patients because of slightly worse outcomes and comparable costs. The utility of the VBHC model of care depends on the availability of sufficient data. Real-world evidence in VBHC can be used to inform treatment decisions and optimization in future patients by sharing results and monitoring performance over time. TRIAL REGISTRATION The study was retrospectively registered at the Netherlands Trial Register (NTR), trial number NL8107 (date of registration: 22-10-2019).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Esmée K J van der Poort
- Department of Biomedical Data Sciences, Leiden University Medical Center, Albinusdreef 2, 2333ZA Leiden, the Netherlands.
| | - Yara van Holstein
- Department of Internal Medicine, Leiden University Medical Center, Albinusdreef 2, 2333ZA Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Marije Slingerland
- Department of Medical Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, Albinusdreef 2, 2333ZA Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Stella Trompet
- Department of Internal Medicine, Leiden University Medical Center, Albinusdreef 2, 2333ZA Leiden, the Netherlands; LUMC Center for Medicine for Older People, Leiden University Medical Center, Albinusdreef 2, 2333ZA Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Frederiek van den Bos
- Department of Internal Medicine, Leiden University Medical Center, Albinusdreef 2, 2333ZA Leiden, the Netherlands; LUMC Center for Medicine for Older People, Leiden University Medical Center, Albinusdreef 2, 2333ZA Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Johanneke E A Portielje
- Department of Medical Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, Albinusdreef 2, 2333ZA Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Ewout W Steyerberg
- Department of Biomedical Data Sciences, Leiden University Medical Center, Albinusdreef 2, 2333ZA Leiden, the Netherlands
| | | | - Willem Jan W Bos
- Department of Internal Medicine, Leiden University Medical Center, Albinusdreef 2, 2333ZA Leiden, the Netherlands; Department of Internal Medicine, St. Antonius Hospital, Koekoekslaan 1, 3435CM Nieuwegein, the Netherlands
| | - Simon P Mooijaart
- Department of Internal Medicine, Leiden University Medical Center, Albinusdreef 2, 2333ZA Leiden, the Netherlands; LUMC Center for Medicine for Older People, Leiden University Medical Center, Albinusdreef 2, 2333ZA Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Wilbert B van den Hout
- Department of Biomedical Data Sciences, Leiden University Medical Center, Albinusdreef 2, 2333ZA Leiden, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Jang JY, Oh D, Noh JM, Sun J, Kim HK, Shim YM. Prognostic impact of muscle mass loss in elderly patients with oesophageal cancer receiving neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy. J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle 2024; 15:1167-1176. [PMID: 38613258 PMCID: PMC11154764 DOI: 10.1002/jcsm.13462] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/13/2023] [Revised: 12/16/2023] [Accepted: 02/28/2024] [Indexed: 04/14/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND We aimed to identify the impact of muscle mass on locally advanced oesophageal cancer (LAEC) in elderly patients receiving neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy (NACRT). METHODS We reviewed the medical records of 345 patients diagnosed with LAEC who underwent NACRT and surgery. Physical variables, including height, weight, skeletal muscle mass, and laboratory values, were obtained before and after NACRT. Body mass index (BMI, kg/m2), neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), and prognostic nutritional index (PNI) were calculated as height/(weight)2, ANC/ALC, platelet count/ALC, and (10 × albumin + 0.05 × ALC), respectively. The cutoff for low muscle mass was 43.0 cm2/m2 for BMI below 25 kg/m2 and 53.0 cm2/m2 for BMI 25 kg/m2 or higher. The skeletal muscle index (SMI) was defined as skeletal muscle area/(height)2 (cm2/m2). The ΔSMI (%/50 days) was defined as (SMI after NACRT - SMI before NACRT)/interval (days) × 50 (days) to compare changes over the same period. The excessive muscle loss (EML) group was defined as patients with ΔSMI ≤-10% following NACRT. An elderly patient was defined as aged ≥65 years. The primary outcome measure was overall survival (OS). RESULTS During a median follow-up of 32.8 months (range, 2.0-176.2), 192 patients died, with a median OS of 50.2 months. Elderly patients did not show inferior OS (young vs. elderly, 57.7% vs. 54.0% at 3 years, P = 0.247). 71.0% and 87.2% of all patients had low muscle mass before and after NACRT, respectively, which was not associated with OS (P = 0.270 and P = 0.509, respectively). Inflammatory (NLR and PLR) and nutritional index (PNI) values or their changes did not correlate with OS. However, the EML group had worse OS (41.6% vs. 63.2% at 3 years, P < 0.0001). In the multivariate analysis, EML was also a significant prognostic factor for OS. In the subgroup analysis by age, EML was a strong prognostic factor for OS in the elderly group. The 3-year OS was 36.8% in the EML group and 64.9% in the non-EML group (P < 0.0001) in elderly patients, and 47.4% and 62.1% (P = 0.063) in the young patients. In multivariate analysis of each subgroup, EML remained prognostic only in the elderly group (P = 0.008). CONCLUSIONS EML may be strongly associated with a deteriorated OS in elderly patients undergoing NACRT, followed by surgery for LAEC. The strategies for decreasing muscle loss in these patients should be investigated.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jeong Yun Jang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Konkuk University Medical CenterKonkuk University School of MedicineSeoulKorea
| | - Dongryul Oh
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Samsung Medical CenterSungkyunkwan University School of MedicineSeoulKorea
| | - Jae Myoung Noh
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Samsung Medical CenterSungkyunkwan University School of MedicineSeoulKorea
| | - Jong‐Mu Sun
- Department of Medicine, Division of Hematology‐Oncology, Samsung Medical CenterSungkyunkwan University School of MedicineSeoulKorea
| | - Hong Kwan Kim
- Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Samsung Medical CenterSungkyunkwan University School of MedicineSeoulKorea
| | - Young Mog Shim
- Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Samsung Medical CenterSungkyunkwan University School of MedicineSeoulKorea
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Pathologic complete response after photodynamic therapy combined with dose-reduction chemoradiotherapy in elderly patient with severe obstruction esophageal carcinoma: A case report. Photodiagnosis Photodyn Ther 2023; 41:103274. [PMID: 36610647 DOI: 10.1016/j.pdpdt.2023.103274] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/06/2022] [Revised: 01/03/2023] [Accepted: 01/03/2023] [Indexed: 01/07/2023]
Abstract
Esophageal Carcinoma (EC) is one of the most aggressive gastrointestinal cancers. Advanced esophageal carcinoma is associated mainly with dysphagia which reduces the quality of life and leads to frail in patients even difficult to tolerate systemic treatments such as surgery and chemoradiotherapy. Moreover, chemoradiotherapy(CRT)cannot relieve dysphagia in a short time especially for the elderly patient with comorbidities. Here, we report a 76-year-old female patient diagnosed with severe obstructive esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) that endoscope could not pass through. She was also complicated with bilateral interstitial pneumonia and moderate pulmonary ventilation dysfunction. The patient was unable to undergo surgery and radical CRT. After multidisciplinary team (MDT) discussion, we gave the patient photodynamic therapy (PDT) treatment firstly. The obstruction was significantly improved within 1 week and normal diet was resumed after 2 weeks. Four weeks later, considering bilateral interstitial pneumonia, concurrent dose-reduction chemoradiotherapy was given for esophageal lesions and abdominal metastatic lymph nodes. There was no recurrence and progression in the esophagus and abdominal lymph nodes until now and the biopsy of the primary esophageal lesion showed pathologic complete response. Now, the patient is still under regular follow-up.
Collapse
|
5
|
The Role of Age and Comorbidities in Esophagogastric Cancer Chemoradiation of the Frail Elderly (>70 Years): An Analysis from a Tertiary High Volume-Center. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 15:cancers15010106. [PMID: 36612103 PMCID: PMC9817865 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15010106] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/12/2022] [Revised: 12/12/2022] [Accepted: 12/22/2022] [Indexed: 12/28/2022] Open
Abstract
Elderly patients > 70 years of age with esophageal cancer (EC) represent a challenging group as frailty and comorbidities need to be considered. The aim of this retrospective study was to evaluate the efficacy and side effects of curative chemoradiation therapy (CRT) with regard to basic geriatric screening in elderly patients in order to elucidate prognostic factors. Thirty-four elderly patients > 70 years with EC treated at our cancer center between May 2014 and October 2018 fulfilled the selection criteria for this retrospective analysis. Treatment consisted of intravenous infusion of carboplatin/paclitaxel or fluorouracil (5-FU)/cisplatin with the intention of neoadjuvant or definite chemoradiation. Clinicopathological data including performance status (ECOG), (age-adjusted) Charlson comorbidity index (CCI), Frailty-scale by Fried, Mini Nutritional Assessment Short Form, body mass index, C-reactive protein to albumin ratio, and treatment-related toxicity (CTCAE) were assessed. Data were analyzed as predictors of overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). All patients (ten female, 24 male) received combined CRT (22 patients in neoadjuvant, 12 patients in definite intent). Median age was 75 years and the ECOG index between 0 and 1 (52.9% vs. 35.3%); four patients were rated as ECOG 3 (11.8%). Median follow-up was 24 months. Tumors were mainly located in the lower esophagus or esophagogastric-junction with an T3 stage (n = 25; 75.8%) and N1 stage (n = 28; 90.3%). 15 patients (44.1%) had SCC, 19 patients (55.9%) AC. 26 of the patients (76.5%) were scored as prefrail and 50% were in risk for malnutrition (n = 17). In relation to the BMI, ten patients (29.4%) were ranked as overweight, and 15 patients were presented in a healthy state of weight (44.1%). Grade 3 acute toxicity (or higher) occured in nine cases (26.5%). Most of the patients did not show any late toxicities (66.7%). Trimodal therapy provides a significant prolonged OS (p = 0.049) regardless of age, but without impact on PFS. Our analysis suggests that chemoradiation therapy is feasible for elderly patients (>70 years) with tolerable toxicity. Trimodal therapy of EC shows a positive effect on OS and PFS. Further studies are needed to elucidate benefitting subgroups within the elderly. In addition to age, treatment decisions should be based on performance status, nutritional condition and multidisciplinary validated geriatric screening tools.
Collapse
|
6
|
Linde P, Mallmann M, Adams A, Wegen S, Rosenbrock J, Trommer M, Marnitz S, Baues C, Celik E. Chemoradiation for elderly patients (≥ 65 years) with esophageal cancer: a retrospective single-center analysis. Radiat Oncol 2022; 17:187. [PMCID: PMC9670495 DOI: 10.1186/s13014-022-02160-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/29/2022] [Accepted: 11/14/2022] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Present studies on the efficacy and safety of curative chemoradiation therapy (CRT) with esophageal cancer reflect heterogenous results especially in elderly patients. The aim of this study was to evaluate the toxicity and efficacy of CRT in patients ≥ 65 years. In a cohort, the focus centered around treatment-related toxicity (CTCAE Grade > 3), overall survival as well as progression free survival, comparing these rates in-between patients older than 70 years to those younger than 70 years.
Methods A total of 67 patients older than 65 years (34 (50.7%) were older than 70 years) met the inclusion criteria for retrospective analysis (period from January 2013 to October 2017). Treatment consisted of radiotherapy and chemotherapy with carboplatin/paclitaxel or fluorouracil (5-FU)/cisplatin with the intention of neoadjuvant or definite chemoradiation. A sum of 67 patients received CRT (44 (65.6%) patients in neoadjuvant, 23 (34.4%) in definite intent). Of these, 22 and 12 patients were older than 70 years (50% and 52.2% in both treatment groups, respectively). Median age was 71 years and patients had a good physical performance status (ECOG 0: 57.6%, ECOG 1: 27.3%). Median follow-up was 24 months. Most patients had advanced tumour stages (T3 stage: n = 51, 79.7%) and nodal metastasis (N1 stage: n = 54, 88.5%). A subgroup comparison was conducted between patients aged ≤ 70 years and > 70 years. Results In severe (CTCAE Grade 3–5) toxicities (acute and late), no significant differences were observed between both patient groups (< 70 years vs. > 70 years). 21% had acute grade 3 events, 4 patients (4%) had grade 4 events, and two patients (3%) had one grade 5 event. Late toxicity after CRT was grade 1 in 13 patients (22%), grade 2 in two (3%), grade 3 in two (3%), grade 4 in four (7%), and grade 5 in one (2%). Median overall survival (OS) of all patients was 30 months and median progression-free survival (PFS) was 16 months. No significant differences were seen for OS (32 months vs. 25 months; p = 0.632) and PFS (16 months vs. 12 months; p = 0.696) between older patients treated with curative intent and younger ones. Trimodal therapy significantly prolonged both OS and PFS (p = 0.005; p = 0.018), regardless of age.
Conclusion CRT in elderly patients (≥ 65 years) with esophageal cancer is feasible and effective. Numbers for acute and late toxicities can be compared to cohorts of younger patients (< 65 years) with EC who received the same therapies. Age at treatment initiation alone should not be the determining factor. Instead, functional status, risk of treatment-related morbidities, life expectancy and patient´s preferences should factor into the choice of therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Philipp Linde
- grid.6190.e0000 0000 8580 3777Department of Radiation Oncology, Cyberknife and Radiation Therapy, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital of Cologne, University of Cologne, Kerpener St 62, 50937 Cologne, Germany ,grid.411097.a0000 0000 8852 305XCenter for Integrated Oncology (CIO), University Hospital of Cologne, Faculty of Medicine and University of Cologne, Kerpener St 62, 50937 Cologne, Germany
| | - Markus Mallmann
- grid.6190.e0000 0000 8580 3777Department of Radiation Oncology, Cyberknife and Radiation Therapy, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital of Cologne, University of Cologne, Kerpener St 62, 50937 Cologne, Germany ,grid.411097.a0000 0000 8852 305XCenter for Integrated Oncology (CIO), University Hospital of Cologne, Faculty of Medicine and University of Cologne, Kerpener St 62, 50937 Cologne, Germany
| | - Anne Adams
- grid.6190.e0000 0000 8580 3777Institute of Medical Statistics and Computational Biology, Faculty of Medicine and University of Cologne, Kerpener St 62, 50937 Cologne, Germany
| | - Simone Wegen
- grid.6190.e0000 0000 8580 3777Department of Radiation Oncology, Cyberknife and Radiation Therapy, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital of Cologne, University of Cologne, Kerpener St 62, 50937 Cologne, Germany ,grid.411097.a0000 0000 8852 305XCenter for Integrated Oncology (CIO), University Hospital of Cologne, Faculty of Medicine and University of Cologne, Kerpener St 62, 50937 Cologne, Germany
| | - Johannes Rosenbrock
- grid.6190.e0000 0000 8580 3777Department of Radiation Oncology, Cyberknife and Radiation Therapy, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital of Cologne, University of Cologne, Kerpener St 62, 50937 Cologne, Germany ,grid.411097.a0000 0000 8852 305XCenter for Integrated Oncology (CIO), University Hospital of Cologne, Faculty of Medicine and University of Cologne, Kerpener St 62, 50937 Cologne, Germany
| | - Maike Trommer
- grid.6190.e0000 0000 8580 3777Department of Radiation Oncology, Cyberknife and Radiation Therapy, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital of Cologne, University of Cologne, Kerpener St 62, 50937 Cologne, Germany ,grid.411097.a0000 0000 8852 305XCenter for Integrated Oncology (CIO), University Hospital of Cologne, Faculty of Medicine and University of Cologne, Kerpener St 62, 50937 Cologne, Germany
| | - Simone Marnitz
- grid.6190.e0000 0000 8580 3777Department of Radiation Oncology, Cyberknife and Radiation Therapy, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital of Cologne, University of Cologne, Kerpener St 62, 50937 Cologne, Germany ,grid.411097.a0000 0000 8852 305XCenter for Integrated Oncology (CIO), University Hospital of Cologne, Faculty of Medicine and University of Cologne, Kerpener St 62, 50937 Cologne, Germany
| | - Christian Baues
- grid.6190.e0000 0000 8580 3777Department of Radiation Oncology, Cyberknife and Radiation Therapy, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital of Cologne, University of Cologne, Kerpener St 62, 50937 Cologne, Germany ,grid.411097.a0000 0000 8852 305XCenter for Integrated Oncology (CIO), University Hospital of Cologne, Faculty of Medicine and University of Cologne, Kerpener St 62, 50937 Cologne, Germany
| | - Eren Celik
- grid.6190.e0000 0000 8580 3777Department of Radiation Oncology, Cyberknife and Radiation Therapy, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital of Cologne, University of Cologne, Kerpener St 62, 50937 Cologne, Germany ,grid.411097.a0000 0000 8852 305XCenter for Integrated Oncology (CIO), University Hospital of Cologne, Faculty of Medicine and University of Cologne, Kerpener St 62, 50937 Cologne, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
van Holstein Y, Trompet S, van Deudekom FJ, van Munster B, de Glas NA, van den Bos F, Uit den Boogaard A, van der Elst MJT, van der Kaaij MAE, Neelis KJ, Langers AMJ, Slingerland M, Portielje JEA, Mooijaart SP. Geriatric assessment and treatment outcomes in a Dutch cohort of older patients with potentially curable esophageal cancer. Acta Oncol 2022; 61:459-467. [PMID: 35193449 DOI: 10.1080/0284186x.2022.2036366] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Patients with potentially curable esophageal cancer can be treated with neo-adjuvant chemoradiotherapy followed by surgery or definitive chemoradiotherapy with curative intent. For frail older patients choosing the appropriate oncological treatment can be difficult, and data on geriatric deficits as determinants of treatment outcomes are not yet available. OBJECTIVES To describe the prevalence of geriatric deficits and to study their association with treatment discontinuation and mortality in older patients with potentially curable esophageal cancer. MATERIAL AND METHODS A cohort study was conducted in a Dutch tertiary care hospital including patients aged ≥70 years with primary stage I-IVA esophageal cancer. Geriatric screening and assessment data were collected. Outcomes were treatment discontinuation and one year all-cause mortality. RESULTS In total, 138 patients with curable esophageal cancer were included. Mean age was 76.1 years (standard deviation 4.7), 54% had clinical stage III and 24% stage IVA disease. Most patients received neo-adjuvant chemoradiotherapy and surgery (41%), 32% definitive chemoradiotherapy and 22% palliative radiotherapy. Overall, one year all-cause mortality was 36%. Geriatric screening and assessment was performed in 94 out of 138 patients, of which 60% was malnourished, 20% dependent in Instrumental Activities of Daily Living (IADL) and 52% was frail. Malnutrition was associated with higher mortality risk (Hazard Ratio, 3.2; 95% Confidence Interval, 1.3-7.7)) independent of age, sex and tumor stage. Seventy-six out of 94 patients were treated with chemoradiotherapy, of which 23% discontinued treatment. Patients with IADL dependency and Charlson Comorbidity Index ≥1 discontinued treatment more often. CONCLUSION All-cause mortality within one year was high, irrespective of treatment modality. Treatment discontinuation rate was high, especially in patients treated with definitive chemoradiotherapy. Geriatric assessment associates with outcomes in older patients with esophageal cancer and may inform treatment decisions and optimization in future patients, but more research is needed to establish its predictive value. Trial registration: The study is retrospectively registered at the Netherlands Trial Register (NTR), trial number NL8107. Date of registration: 22-10-2019.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yara van Holstein
- Department of Internal Medicine, section of Gerontology and Geriatrics, Leiden University Medical Center, The Netherlands
| | - Stella Trompet
- Department of Internal Medicine, section of Gerontology and Geriatrics, Leiden University Medical Center, The Netherlands
| | - Floor J. van Deudekom
- Department of Internal Medicine, section of Gerontology and Geriatrics, Leiden University Medical Center, The Netherlands
| | - Barbara van Munster
- Department of Internal Medicine, University Medical Center Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Nienke A. de Glas
- Department of Medical Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, The Netherlands
| | - Frederiek van den Bos
- Department of Internal Medicine, section of Gerontology and Geriatrics, Leiden University Medical Center, The Netherlands
| | - Anna Uit den Boogaard
- Department of Internal Medicine, section of Gerontology and Geriatrics, Leiden University Medical Center, The Netherlands
| | - Marjan J. T. van der Elst
- Department of Internal Medicine, section of Gerontology and Geriatrics, Leiden University Medical Center, The Netherlands
| | | | - Karen J. Neelis
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, The Netherlands
| | - Alexandra M. J. Langers
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Leiden University Medical Center, The Netherlands
| | - Marije Slingerland
- Department of Medical Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, The Netherlands
| | | | - Simon P. Mooijaart
- Department of Internal Medicine, section of Gerontology and Geriatrics, Leiden University Medical Center, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Lv H, Chao C, Wang B, Wang Z, Qian Y, Zhang X. The effect of surgery plus chemoradiotherapy on survival of elderly patients with stage Ⅱ-Ⅲ esophageal cancer: a SEER-based demographic analysis. Cancer Med 2021; 10:8483-8496. [PMID: 34800005 PMCID: PMC8633220 DOI: 10.1002/cam4.4352] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/09/2021] [Revised: 08/28/2021] [Accepted: 09/24/2021] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The optimal treatment for elderly patients with esophageal cancer (EC) remains controversial. In the present study, we aimed to investigate whether elderly patients with stage II–III EC could benefit from trimodal therapy. Methods The selected elderly patients with stage II–III EC between 2004 and 2015 were included in a retrospective cohort study from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database. The patients were divided into two groups based on whether or not they underwent surgery. The inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) analysis was used to balance the confounding factors between the two groups. The Cox regression analysis, the log‐rank test, and the Kaplan–Meier curves were conducted to identify the survival benefits of different treatment regimes. Results A total of 1596 patients were included in this cohort study, in which 278 patients underwent surgery. In the combination of chemoradiotherapy and surgery group, there were more male patients, more patients aged between 75 and 79 years, and more married patients in the surgery group. Moreover, there were more patients with adenomatous carcinoma, more patients with a tumor size of less than 5 cm, and more patients with a T3 stage in the combination group. In the survival analysis, patients in the combination group had a longer overall survival (OS) and EC‐specific survival (ECSS). After IPTW analysis, the survival analysis generated similar results. The competitive risk model found that our results were stable. There was still a significant difference in OS and ECSS between the combination group and chemoradiotherapy alone group for esophageal adenocarcinoma (p < 0.001). Conclusions Elderly patients with stage II–III EC, especially those with adenocarcinoma, could benefit from the combination of surgery and chemoradiotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hao Lv
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Changzhou, China
| | - Ce Chao
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Changzhou, China
| | - Bin Wang
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Changzhou, China
| | - Zhigang Wang
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Changzhou, China
| | - Yongxiang Qian
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Changzhou, China
| | - Xiaoying Zhang
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Changzhou, China
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Wang SX, Marshall MB. Chemoradiation Therapy as Definitive Treatment of Esophageal Cancer. Surg Clin North Am 2021; 101:443-451. [PMID: 34048764 DOI: 10.1016/j.suc.2021.03.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
Definitive chemoradiation therapy avoids the perioperative and long-term morbidity of esophagectomy and is the standard of care for cervical esophageal cancer. There are significant differences in tumor response to chemoradiation and recurrence patterns between squamous cell cancer and adenocarcinoma of the esophagus. Multimodality therapy for esophageal cancer continues to progress, now with the widespread use of PET scanning and possible active surveillance in patients with complete clinical response to chemoradiation. As drug development and targeted therapy trials continue to expand, our understanding of tumor biology and precision medicine will continue to refine the treatment of esophageal cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sue Xue Wang
- Division of Thoracic Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, 75 Francis Street, Boston, MA 02115, USA
| | - M Blair Marshall
- Division of Thoracic Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, 75 Francis Street, Boston, MA 02115, USA; Division of Thoracic Surgery, West Roxbury VA Medical Center, 1400 VFW Pkwy, West Roxbury, MA 02132, USA.
| |
Collapse
|