Usefulness of Simple Original Interstitial Lung Abnormality Scores for Predicting Radiation Pneumonitis Requiring Steroidal Treatment After Definitive Radiation Therapy for Patients With Locally Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

Interstitial Lung Abnormalities: Current Understanding

Interstitial lung abnormalities (ILAs) are incidental findings on computed tomography scans, characterized by nondependent abnormalities affecting more than 5% of any lung zone. They are associated with factors such as age, smoking, genetic variants, worsened clinical outcomes, and increased mortality. Risk stratification based on clinical and radiological features of ILAs is crucial in clinical practice, particularly for identifying cases at high risk of progression to pulmonary fibrosis. Traction bronchiectasis/bronchiolectasis index has emerged as a promising imaging biomarker for prognostic risk stratification in ILAs. These findings suggest a spectrum of fibrosing interstitial lung diseases, encompassing from ILAs to pulmonary fibrosis.

Automated CT quantification of interstitial lung abnormality and interstitial lung disease according to the Fleischner Society in patients with resectable lung cancer: prognostic significance

OBJECTIVE

To assess the prognostic significance of automatically quantified interstitial lung abnormality (ILA) according to the definition by the Fleischner Society in patients with resectable non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

METHODS

Patients who underwent lobectomy or pneumonectomy for NSCLC between January 2015 and December 2019 were retrospectively included. Preoperative CT scans were analyzed using the commercially available deep-learning-based automated quantification software for ILA. According to quantified results and the definition by the Fleischner Society and multidisciplinary discussion, patients were divided into normal, ILA, and interstitial lung disease (ILD) groups.

RESULTS

Of the 1524 patients, 87 (5.7%) and 20 (1.3%) patients had ILA and ILD, respectively. Both ILA (HR, 1.81; 95% CI: 1.25-2.61; p = .002) and ILD (HR, 5.26; 95% CI: 2.99-9.24; p < .001) groups had poor recurrence-free survival (RFS). Overall survival (OS) decreased (HR 2.13 [95% CI: 1.27-3.58; p = .004] for the ILA group and 7.20 [95% CI: 3.80-13.62, p < .001] for the ILD group) as the disease severity increased. Both quantified fibrotic and non-fibrotic ILA components were associated with poor RFS (HR, 1.57; 95% CI: 1.12-2.21; p = .009; and HR, 1.11; 95% CI: 1.01-1.23; p = .03) and OS (HR, 1.59; 95% CI: 1.06-2.37; p = .02; and HR, 1.17; 95% CI: 1.03-1.33; and p = .01) in normal and ILA groups.

CONCLUSIONS

The automated CT quantification of ILA based on the definition by the Fleischner Society predicts outcomes of patients with resectable lung cancer based on the disease category and quantified fibrotic and non-fibrotic ILA components.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT

Quantitative CT assessment of ILA provides prognostic information for lung cancer patients after surgery, which can help in considering active surveillance for recurrence, especially in those with a larger extent of quantified ILA.

KEY POINTS

• Of the 1524 patients with resectable lung cancer, 1417 (93.0%) patients were categorized as normal, 87 (5.7%) as interstitial lung abnormality (ILA), and 20 (1.3%) as interstitial lung disease (ILD). • Both ILA and ILD groups were associated with poor recurrence-free survival (hazard ratio [HR], 1.81, p = .002; HR, 5.26, p < .001, respectively) and overall survival (HR, 2.13; p = .004; HR, 7.20; p < .001). • Both quantified fibrotic and non-fibrotic ILA components were associated with recurrence-free survival and overall survival in normal and ILA groups.

Subpleural fibrotic interstitial lung abnormalities are implicated in non-small cell lung cancer radiotherapy outcomes

BACKGROUND

The relationship between interstitial lung abnormalities (ILAs) and the outcomes of lung cancer radiotherapy is unclear. This study investigated whether specific ILA subtypes are risk factors for radiation pneumonitis (RP).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This retrospective study analysed patients with non-small cell lung cancer treated with radical-intent or salvage radiotherapy. Patients were categorised into normal (no abnormalities), ILA, and interstitial lung disease (ILD) groups. The ILA group was further subclassified into non-subpleural (NS), subpleural non-fibrotic (SNF), and subpleural fibrotic (SF) types. The Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression methods were used to determine RP and survival rates and compare these outcomes between groups, respectively.

RESULTS

Overall, 175 patients (normal, n = 105; ILA-NS, n = 5; ILA-SNF, n = 28; ILA-SF, n = 31; ILD, n = 6) were enrolled. Grade ≥2 RP was observed in 71 (41%) patients. ILAs (hazard ratio [HR]: 2.33, p = 0.008), intensity-modulated radiotherapy (HR: 0.38, p = 0.03), and lung volume receiving 20 Gy (HR: 54.8, p = 0.03) contributed to the cumulative incidence of RP. Eight patients with grade 5 RP were in the ILA group, seven of whom had ILA-SF. Among radically treated patients, the ILA group had worse 2-year overall survival (OS) than the normal group (35.3% vs 54.6%, p = 0.005). Multivariate analysis revealed that the ILA-SF group contributed to poor OS (HR: 3.07, p =0.02).

CONCLUSIONS

ILAs, particularly ILA-SF, may be important risk factors for RP, which can worsen prognosis. These findings may aid in making decisions regarding radiotherapy.

Development and validation of a random forest model for predicting radiation pneumonitis in lung cancer patients receiving moderately hypofractionated radiotherapy: a retrospective cohort study

Background

Radiation pneumonitis (RP) is a type of toxicity commonly associated with thoracic radiation therapy. We sought to establish a random forest (RF) model and evaluate its ability to predict RP in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) receiving moderately hypofractionated radiotherapy (hypo-RT).

Methods

A total of 106 patients with stage II-IVa NSCLC who received moderately hypofractionated helical tomotherapy (2.3-3.0 Gy/fraction) at Zhongshan Hospital were included. All enrolled patients were divided chronologically into the training (67 patients) and validation (39 patients) groups. Higher than or equal to grade 2 RP was defined as the end point. Logistic regression and RF models were established and compared using the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) and a confusion matrix in the training and validation groups.

Results

The cumulative incidence of the end point was 25.4% and 17.9% in the training and validation groups, respectively. Logistic regression models were constructed by dosage parameters of total lungs, ipsilateral or contralateral lungs, respectively. ROC analysis revealed that the dosimetric factors of total lungs yielded a superior classification performance than did that of the ipsilateral or contralateral lungs [area under the curve (AUC) =0.920, AUC =0.701, and AUC =0.661, respectively]. Furthermore, the RF model yielded a better prediction capacity than did the traditional logistic model based on the dosimetric factors of the total lungs (accuracy: 88.06%; precision: 84.62%; sensitivity: 64.71%; specificity: 96.00%). Moreover, the RF identified mean lung dose [MLD; mean decrease gini (MDG) =5.74], V20 (MDG =4.62), and V35 (MDG =3.08) of total lungs as the most common primary differentiators of RP.

Conclusions

Our RF model established based on the dosimetric parameters of the total lungs could accurately predict the RP risk in patients with NSCLC treated with moderately hypofractionated tomotherapy.

Interstitial Lung Abnormalities at CT: Subtypes, Clinical Significance, and Associations with Lung Cancer

Interstitial lung abnormality (ILA) is defined as an interstitial change detected incidentally on CT images. It is seen in 4%-9% of smokers and 2%-7% of nonsmokers. ILA has a tendency to progress with time and is associated with respiratory symptoms, decreased exercise capability, reduced pulmonary function, and increased mortality. ILAs can be classified into three subcategories: nonsubpleural, subpleural nonfibrotic, and subpleural fibrotic. In cases of ILA, clinically significant interstitial lung disease should be identified and requires clinically driven management by a pulmonologist. Risk factors for the progression of ILA include clinical elements (ie, inhalation exposures, medication use, radiation therapy, thoracic surgery, physiologic findings, and gas exchange findings) and radiologic elements (ie, basal and peripheral predominance and fibrotic findings). It is recommended that individuals with one or more clinical or radiologic risk factors for progression of ILA be actively monitored with pulmonary function testing and CT. To avoid overcalling ILA at CT, radiologists must recognize the imaging pitfalls, including centrilobular nodularity, dependent abnormality, suboptimal inspiration, osteophyte-related lesions, apical cap and pleuroparenchymal fibroelastosis-like lesions, aspiration, and infection. There is a close association between ILA and lung cancer, and many studies have reported an increased incidence of lung cancer, worse prognoses, and/or increased pulmonary complications in relation to cancer treatment in patients with ILA. ILA is considered to be an important comorbidity in patients with lung cancer. Accordingly, all radiologists involved with body CT must have sound knowledge of ILAs owing to the high prevalence and potential clinical significance of these anomalies. An overview of ILAs, including a literature review of the associations between ILAs and lung cancer, is presented. ©RSNA, 2022.