Force- and relaxation-frequency relations in patients with diastolic heart failure

Routine beta-blocker therapy after acute coronary syndromes: The end of an era?

BACKGROUND

Beta-blocker therapy, a treatment burdened by side effects including fatigue, erectile dysfunction and depression, was shown to reduce mortality and cardiovascular events after acute coronary syndromes (ACS) in the pre-coronary reperfusion era. Potential mechanisms include protection from ventricular arrhythmias, increased ischaemia threshold and prevention of left ventricular (LV) adverse remodelling. With the advent of early mechanical reperfusion and contemporary pharmacologic secondary prevention, the benefit of beta-blockers after ACS in the absence of LV dysfunction has been challenged.

METHODS

The present narrative review discusses the contemporary evidence based on searching the PubMed database and references in identified articles.

RESULTS

Recently, the REDUCE-AMI trial-the first adequately powered randomized trial in the reperfusion era to test beta-blocker therapy after myocardial infarction with preserved left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF)-showed no benefit on the composite of all-cause death or myocardial infarction over a median 3.5-year follow-up. While the benefit of beta-blockers in patients with reduced LVEF remains undisputed, their value in post-ACS patients with mildly reduced systolic function (LVEF 41%-49%) has not been studied in contemporary randomized trials; in this setting, observational studies have suggested a reduction in cardiovascular events with these agents. The adequate duration of beta-blocker therapy remains unknown, but observational data suggests that any mortality benefit may be lost beyond 1-12 months after ACS in patients with LVEF >40%.

CONCLUSION

We believe that there is sufficient evidence to abandon routine beta-blocker prescription in post-ACS patients with preserved LV systolic function.

Anti-bradycardia pacing-impact on patients with HFpEF: a systematic review

Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) has become an emerging concern. The protective effect of bradycardia in patients with reduced ejection fraction using beta-blockers or ivabradine does not improve symptoms in HFpEF. This review aims to assess current data regarding the impact of anti-bradycardia pacing in patients with HFpEF. A search was conducted on PubMed, ScienceDirect, Springer, and Wiley Online Library, selecting studies from 2013 to 2023. Relevant and eligible prospective studies and randomized controlled trials were included. Functional status, quality of life, and echocardiographic parameters were assessed. Six studies conformed to the selection criteria. Four were prospective studies with a total of 90 patients analyzed. Two were randomized controlled trials with a total of 129 patients assessed. The 6-min walk test (6MWT) and the Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire (MLHFQ) score improved in all prospective studies. My-PACE trial showed improvements in MLHFQ score (p < 0.001), significant relative lowering in NT-proBNP levels (p = 0.02), and an increased mean daily activity in the personalized accelerated pacing group compared to usual care. RAPID-HF trial proved that pacemaker implantation to enhance exercise heart rate (HR) did not improve exercise capacity and was associated with increased adverse events. HFpEF requires a more individualized approach and quality of life management. This review demonstrates that higher resting HR by atrial pacing may improve symptoms and even outcomes in HFpEF, while a higher adaptive rate during exertion has not been proven beneficial.

Effects of Continuous Accelerated Pacing on Cardiac Structure and Function in Patients With Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction: Insights From the myPACE Randomized Clinical Trial

BACKGROUND

Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction ≥50% is prevalent with few evidence-based therapies. In a trial of patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction with specialized pacemakers, treatment with accelerated personalized pacing averaging 75 bpm (myPACE) markedly improved quality of life, NT-proBNP (N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide), physical activity, and atrial fibrillation burden compared with the standard lower rate setting of 60 bpm (usual care).

METHODS AND RESULTS

In this exploratory study, provider-initiated echocardiographic studies obtained before and after the trial were assessed for changes in left ventricular (LV) structure and function among participants who continued their pacing assignment. The analytic approach aimed to detect differences in standard and advanced echocardiographic parameters within and between study arms. Of the 100 participants, 16 myPACE and 20 usual care arm had a qualifying set of echocardiograms performed a mean (SD) 3 (2.0) years apart. Despite similar baseline echocardiogram measures, sustained exposure to moderately accelerated pacing resulted in reduced septal wall thickness (in cm: myPACE 1.1 [0.2] versus usual care 1.2 [0.2], P=0.008) and lower LV mass to systolic volume ratio (in g/mL: myPACE 4.8 [1.9] versus usual care 6.8 [3.1], P=0.038) accompanied by a minor reduction in LV ejection fraction (in %: myPACE 55 [5] versus usual care 60 [5], P=0.015). These changes were paralleled by improvements in heart failure-related quality of life (myPACE Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire improved by 16.1 [13.9] points, whereas usual care worsened by 6.9 [11.6] points, P<0.001). Markers of diastolic function and LV performance were not affected.

CONCLUSIONS

Exposure to continuous accelerated pacing in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction is associated with a reduced LV wall thickness and a small amount of LV dilation with small reduction in ejection fraction.

Effect of Personalized Accelerated Pacing on Quality of Life, Physical Activity, and Atrial Fibrillation in Patients With Preclinical and Overt Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction: The myPACE Randomized Clinical Trial

Importance

Patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) with a pacemaker may benefit from a higher, more physiologic backup heart rate than the nominal 60 beats per minute (bpm) setting.

Objective

To assess the effects of a moderately accelerated personalized backup heart rate compared with 60 bpm (usual care) in patients with preexisting pacemaker systems that limit pacemaker-mediated dyssynchrony.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This blinded randomized clinical trial enrolled patients with stage B and C HFpEF from the University of Vermont Medical Center pacemaker clinic between June 2019 and November 2020. Analysis was modified intention to treat.

Interventions

Participants were randomly assigned to personalized accelerated pacing or usual care and were followed up for 1 year. The personalized accelerated pacing heart rate was calculated using a resting heart rate algorithm based on height and modified by ejection fraction.

Main Outcomes and Measures

The primary outcome was the serial change in Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire (MLHFQ) score. Secondary end points were changes in N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) levels, pacemaker-detected physical activity, atrial fibrillation from baseline, and adverse clinical events.

Results

Overall, 107 participants were randomly assigned to the personalized accelerated pacing (n = 50) or usual care (n = 57) groups. The median (IQR) age was 75 (69-81) years, and 48 (48%) were female. Over 1-year follow-up, the median (IQR) pacemaker-detected heart rate was 75 (75-80) bpm in the personalized accelerated pacing arm and 65 (63-68) bpm in usual care. MLHFQ scores improved in the personalized accelerated pacing group (median [IQR] baseline MLHFQ score, 26 [8-45]; at 1 month, 15 [2-25]; at 1 year, 9 [4-21]; P < .001) and worsened with usual care (median [IQR] baseline MLHFQ score, 19 [6-42]; at 1 month, 23 [5-39]; at 1 year, 27 [7-52]; P = .03). In addition, personalized accelerated pacing led to improved changes in NT-proBNP levels (mean [SD] decrease of 109 [498] pg/dL vs increase of 128 [537] pg/dL with usual care; P = .02), activity levels (mean [SD], +47 [67] minutes per day vs -22 [35] minutes per day with usual care; P < .001), and device-detected atrial fibrillation (27% relative risk reduction compared with usual care; P = .04) over 1-year of follow-up. Adverse clinical events occurred in 4 patients in the personalized accelerated pacing group and 11 patients in usual care.

Conclusions and Relevance

In this study, among patients with HFpEF and pacemakers, treatment with a moderately accelerated, personalized pacing rate was safe and improved quality of life, NT-proBNP levels, physical activity, and atrial fibrillation compared with the usual 60 bpm setting.

Trial Registration

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04721314.

A normal pattern of mitral inflow predicts a better prognosis following cardiovascular events in early advanced-age patients

Although a mitral inflow pattern usually changes from a normal pattern to an abnormal relaxation pattern as part of the aging process in healthy people, some early advanced-age individuals maintain a normal pattern. We investigated whether a normal pattern of mitral inflow predicts a better prognosis following cardiovascular (CV) events in early advanced-age patients. We enrolled 425 patients aged 60-65 years with 0.6 < E/A < 1.5. Patients were divided according to their mitral inflow pattern, i.e., a normal pattern group (E/A ≥ 1.0, n = 77) and an abnormal relaxation pattern group (E/A < 1, n = 348), and were evaluated the relationship with CV events. Multivariate regression analysis found that the normal inflow pattern was associated with odds ratios of 0.859 for body mass index (BMI; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.778-0.937), 0.529 for hypertension (0.303-0.924), and 0.325 for heart rate (0.228-0.463). During the follow-up period (4.9 ± 1.8 years), the adjusted-hazard ratio was significantly lower in the normal pattern group (HR: 0.119, 95% CI 0.016-0.910). Kaplan-Meier curves showed a higher event-free rate for the normal pattern group than for the abnormal relaxation pattern group (p = 0.0292). Normal inflow pattern in early advanced-age patients predicts a better prognosis following CV events.

Personalized pacing for diastolic dysfunction and heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: Design and rationale for the myPACE randomized controlled trial

Background

Patients with pacemakers and heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) or isolated diastolic dysfunction (DD) may benefit from a higher backup heart rate (HR) setting compared with the standard setting of 60 bpm.

Objective

The purpose of this study was to assess the effects of a personalized backup HR setting (myPACE group) compared with 60 bpm (control group).

Methods

In this prospective, blinded, randomized controlled study, pacemaker patients with DD or HFpEF and atrial pacing with intrinsic ventricular conduction or conduction system or biventricular pacing are randomized to the myPACE group or control group for 1 year. The primary outcome is the change in Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire (MLHFQ) scores. Secondary endpoints include changes in N-terminal pro–brain natriuretic peptide levels, physical and emotional MLHFQ subscores, and pacemaker-detected atrial arrhythmia burden, patient activity levels, and thoracic impedance; hospitalization for heart failure, atrial fibrillation, cerebrovascular accident, or myocardial infarction; and loop diuretic or antiarrhythmic medication initiation or up-titration. A sample size of 118 subjects is expected to allow detection of a 5-point change in MLHFQ score in an intention-to-treat analysis and allow initial assessment of clinical outcomes and subgroup analyses.

Results

Enrollment began in July 2019. As of November 2020, 107 subjects have been enrolled. It is projected that the 1-year follow-up will be completed by December 2021.

Conclusion

Atrial pacing with intrinsic ventricular conduction or advanced ventricular pacing at a higher, personalized backup HR may be a therapeutic target for patients with isolated DD or HFpEF. The myPACE trial is designed to test this hypothesis.

Differential Effect of the Morning Blood Pressure Surge on Prognoses Between Heart Failure With Reduced and Preserved Ejection Fractions

BACKGROUND

Rising blood pressure (BP) in the morning, known as the morning BP surge (MBPS), is known to pose a risk for cardiovascular events in hypertensive individuals. It was not known whether the MBPS was associated with a worse prognosis in patients with heart failure (HF) with a reduced (HFrEF) or preserved (HFpEF) ejection fraction.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We performed a prospective, observational cohort study of hospitalized HF patients who underwent ambulatory BP monitoring (ABPM). The MBPS was calculated by subtracting the mean systolic BP (SBP) during the 1 h that included the lowest sleep BP from the mean SBP during the 2 h after waking. The MBPS group was defined as the top decile of MBPS (>40 mmHg). In all, 456 hospitalized HF patients (mean [±SD] age 68±13 years, 63.9% male) were followed-up for a median of 1.67 years. There were 90 events (16.3 per 100 person-years) of the composite outcome (all-cause mortality and worsening HF) in the HFrEF group, compared with 53 events (19.6 per 100 person-years) in the HFpEF group. Multivariate Cox regression analysis showed that MBPS was a significant predictor of outcome (hazard ratio 2.84, 95% confidence interval 1.58-5.10, P<0.01) in the HFrEF but not HFpEF group.

CONCLUSIONS

MBPS was found to be a novel predictor of worsening HF in patients with HFrEF.

Optimal Heart Rate Modulation Using Ivabradine

Heart rate modulation therapy using ivabradine improves mortality and morbidity in patients with systolic dysfunction. However, a target heart rate remains uncertain. Echocardiography-guided ivabradine therapy, in which we attempt to approach zero overlap between two diastolic filling inflow waves, has recently been proposed to maximize cardiac output, facilitate reverse remodeling, and reduce mortality and morbidity, instead of using an absolute value for the target heart rate. Prospective studies are needed to validate the clinical implication of these therapeutic strategies. Also, this concept should be expanded to other clinical scenarios.

How to Estimate the Optimal Heart Rate in Patients with Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction

Ideal heart rate (HR), particularly for those with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF), remains unknown. We hypothesized that cardiac output would be maximum when the overlap between E-wave and A-wave at the trans-mitral flow is "zero" in the Doppler echocardiography. We retrospectively investigated the association among the overlap length between two waves, actual HR, and other echocardiographic parameters to construct a formula for estimating theoretically ideal HR among those with HFpEF. In total, 48 HFpEF patients were included (70-year-olds, 18 males). Given the results of multivariate linear regression analyses, the overlap length was estimated as follows: -1,050 + 8.4 × (HR [bpm]) + 0.6 × (deceleration time [millisecond]) + 1.7 × (A-width [millisecond]), which had a strong agreement with the actually measured overlap length (r = 0.86, P < 0.001). Theoretically ideal HR was calculated by substituting zero into the estimated overlap length as follows: 125 - 0.07 × (deceleration time [millisecond]) - 0.20 × (A-width [millisecond]). In the validation cohort including another 143 HFpEF patients, the estimated overlap using the formula again had a strong agreement with the actually measured overlap (r = 0.72, P < 0.001). In this study, we proposed a novel formula for calculating theoretically ideal HR, consisting of deceleration time and A-width, in the HFpEF cohort. Clinical implication to optimize the HR targeting the theoretically ideal HR should be investigated in prospective studies.

Effect of Reducing Heart Rate on Outcomes in Patients With Reduced Ejection Fraction

Since 1953, sinus tachycardia has been defined as a heart rate (HR) in sinus rhythm of >100 beats per minute (bpm). However, this number has never been formally evaluated, and no established threshold values for special groups, such as those with heart failure (HF) accompanied by a reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). Herein, we provided evidence that lowering the HR of patients with HFrEF to <70 bpm with medications such as ivabradine improves outcomes. Numerous large-scale trials and smaller clinical studies have shown that reducing the HR in patients with HFrEF improves cardiovascular and overall outcomes. Evidence suggests that a HR of <70 bpm is appropriate for patients with HFrEF. Examination of HF registries indicates that in a large proportion of these patients the HR exceeds 80 bpm, and no consideration is given to lowering the HR, due in large part to lack of physician awareness of the benefits of a lower HR. Evidence indicates that the first-line medication for lowering HR in patients with HFrEF is ivabradine. In conclusion, the improved prognosis following appropriate HR management in patients with HFrEF suggest that the cut-off value for sinus tachycardia in these patients should be redefined as 75 bpm. Maintaining a HR of <70 bpm in patients with HFrEF is associated with improved cardiovascular and overall outcomes.

Impact of optimal heart rate on left ventricular reverse remodeling and functional improvement in patients with systolic heart failure

Heart rate modulation therapy using ivabradine reduces mortality and morbidity in patients with systolic heart failure, whereas too reduced heart rate seems to worsen the clinical outcome. The optimal heart rate during heart rate modulation therapy remains unknown. Consecutive patients with left ventricular ejection fraction < 50% who received echocardiographic assessments and simultaneous heart rate measurements were retrospectively investigated. Theoretically ideal heart rate was calculated using a previously proposed formula: 93 - 0.13 × (deceleration time [msec]). Impacts of heart rate on the 1-year echocardiographic left ventricular reverse remodeling were compared among the three groups stratified by the heart rate status: optimal heart rate group (within 10 bpm of ideal heart rate), below-optimal heart rate group (< 10 bpm of ideal heart rate), and above-optimal heart rate group (> 10 bpm of ideal heart rate). A total of 75 patients (70 years old, 60 men) were included. There were no significant differences in the baseline characteristics among the three groups, except for the higher prevalence of tolvaptan use and higher plasma B-type natriuretic peptide level in the below-optimal heart rate group. Left ventricular end-diastolic diameter (from 55 to 54) and left ventricular ejection fraction (from 39 to 46) improved significantly only in the optimal heart rate group at 1-year follow-up (p < 0.05 for both). Optimal heart rate, which was calculated using a formula consisting of deceleration time, was associated with cardiac reverse remodeling in patients with systolic heart failure. Prospective study to investigate the implication of deceleration time-guided aggressive heart rate optimization is the next concern.

Efficacy and Safety of Ivabradine Once-Daily Prolonged-Release versus Twice-Daily Immediate-Release Formulation in Patients with Stable Chronic Heart Failure with Systolic Dysfunction: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Phase 3 Non-Inferiority (PROFICIENT) Study

Introduction

Dosing frequency is an important factor influencing medication compliance in patients with heart failure (HF), which in turn is imperative in achieving the desired therapeutic outcome. Here we assessed the efficacy and safety of ivabradine prolonged-release (PR) once-daily (test) vs. ivabradine immediate-release (IR) twice-daily (reference) formulations in patients with stable chronic HF with systolic dysfunction.

Methods

Patients with sinus rhythm and heart rate (HR) ≥ 50 bpm, left ventricular ejection fraction ≤ 40% (HF with reduced ejection fraction), on guideline-based standard care, receiving a stable dose of ivabradine IR 5/7.5 mg twice daily for ≥ 1 month were enrolled in this randomized, double-blind, phase 3 non-inferiority study. Patients were randomly assigned 1:1 to ivabradine PR (10 mg/15 mg) based on the ivabradine IR dosage or continued ivabradine IR (5 mg/7.5 mg). The primary endpoint was change in resting ECG HR from baseline to the end of 3 months, assessed by 12-lead ECG. Safety assessments and 24-h Holter HR monitoring (in a subgroup of patients) were also performed. Non-inferiority was concluded if the upper limit of the 95% CI of the difference between the test and reference was less than the margin of 6.5 bpm in the per-protocol set.

Results

A total of 169 out of 180 randomized patients (93.9%) completed the study (PR = 84; IR = 85). The least-square mean (standard error [SE]) for change in HR from baseline to 3 months was 0.76 (1.188; 95% CI −1.59:3.11) in ivabradine PR vs. ivabradine IR, which was within the pre-specified margin of 6.5 bpm, confirming the non-inferiority of ivabradine PR. The change from baseline to 3 months was comparable between the treatment groups for 24-h Holter ECG monitoring (p = 0.3701), mean HR awake (p = 0.3423), and mean HR asleep (p = 0.1501). Thirty-nine treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were reported; the majority in both groups were of mild or moderate severity and were subsequently resolved. Seven serious adverse events were reported (ivabradine PR = 2; ivabradine IR = 5), of which one was fatal (ivabradine IR group). The bradycardia events reported were comparable between groups.

Conclusion

Ivabradine PR was found to be non-inferior to ivabradine IR in the management of patients with stable CHF, with a comparable safety profile. Once-daily ivabradine PR effectively maintained the HR in patients shifted from the ivabradine IR twice-daily regimen, and thus may aid in improving treatment compliance.

Trial Registration

CTRI/2018/04/013464 (Trial Registered Prospectively on 24/04/2018)

How to consider target heart rate in patients with systolic heart failure

AIMS

Heart rate reduction therapy using ivabradine, a selective inhibitor of the funny current of the sinoatrial node, is widely used in the systolic heart failure cohort. However, the optimal target of heart rate remains controversial. The association between heart rate and 'overlap' between E-wave and A-wave in the pulse wave transmitral flow Doppler echocardiography might be a key to find the ideal heart rate in each individual.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We performed transthoracic echocardiography in patients with systolic heart failure, and the association between heart rate, deceleration time, and overlap length between E-wave and A-wave was assessed. In total, 368 patients with systolic heart failure (median 76 years old, 190 men, median ejection fraction 40%) were included. The measured overlap length was 35 (-72, 115) ms. Given the results of multiple linear regression analyses, we constructed a formula: estimated overlap length (ms) = -589 + 6.2 × heart rate (bpm) + 0.81 × deceleration time (ms), which had a good agreement with actually measured one (r = 0.62). The ideal heart rate, at which the overlap length is 'zero' and probably cardiac output is maximized, is calculated as follows: ideal heart rate (bpm) = 93 - 0.13 × deceleration time (ms).

CONCLUSIONS

We proposed a novel formula using deceleration time to estimate ideal heart rate that achieves a zero overlap between E-wave and A-wave in patients with systolic heart failure. Prognostic impact of the formula-guided heart rate optimization should be studied.

Cardiovascular magnetic resonance feature tracking for characterization of patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: correlation of global longitudinal strain with invasive diastolic functional indices

BACKGROUND

Left ventricular (LV) diastolic dysfunction is the main cause of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF), and is characterized by LV stiffness and relaxation. Abnormal LV global longitudinal strain (GLS) is frequently observed l in HFpEF, and was shown to be useful in identifying HFpEF patients at high risk for a cardiovascular event. Cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) feature tracking (CMR-FT) enables the reproducible and non-invasive assessment of global strain from cine CMR images. However, the association between GLS and invasively measured parameters of diastolic function has not been investigated. We sought to determine the prevalence and severity of GLS impairment in patients with HFpEF by using CMR-FT, and to evaluate the correlation between GLS measured by CMR-FT and that measured by invasive diastolic functional indices.

METHODS

Eighteen patients with HFpEF and 18 age- and sex-matched healthy control subjects were studied. All subjects underwent cine, pre- and post-contrast T1 mapping and late gadolinium-enhancement CMR. In the HFpEF patients, invasive pressure-volume loops were obtained to evaluate LV diastolic properties. GLS was quantified from cine CMR, and extracellular volume fraction (ECV) was quantified from pre- and post-contrast T1 mapping as a known imaging biomarker for predicting LV stiffness.

RESULTS

GLS was significantly impaired in patients with HFpEF (- 14.8 ± 3.3 vs.-19.5 ± 2.8%, p < 0.001). Thirty nine percent (7/18) of HFpEF patients showed impaired GLS with a cut-off of - 13.9%. Statistically significant difference was found in ECV between HFpEF patients and controls (32.2 ± 3.8% vs. 29.9 ± 2.6%, p = 0.044). In HFpEF patients, the time constant of active LV relaxation (Tau) was strongly correlated with GLS (r = 0.817, p < 0.001), global circumferential strain (GCS) (r = 0.539, p = 0.021) and global radial strain (GRS) (r = - 0.552, p = 0.017). Multiple linear regression analysis revealed GLS as the only independent predictor of altered Tau (beta = 0.817, p < 0.001) among age, LV end-diastolic volume index, LV end-systolic volume index, LV mass index, GCS, GRS and GLS.

CONCLUSIONS

CMR-FT is a noninvasive approach that enables identification of the subgroup of HFpEF patients with impaired GLS. CMR LV GLS independently predicts abnormal invasive LV relaxation index Tau measurements in HFpEF patients. These findings suggest that feature-tracking CMR analysis in conjunction with ECV, may enable evaluation of diastolic dysfunction in patients with HFpEF.

Blunted frequency-dependent upregulation of cardiac output is related to impaired relaxation in diastolic heart failure

AIMS

We tested the hypothesis that, in heart failure with normal ejection fraction (HFNEF), diastolic dysfunction is accentuated at increasing heart rates, and this contributes to impaired frequency-dependent augmentation of cardiac output.

METHODS AND RESULTS

In 17 patients with HFNEF (median age 69 years, 13 female) and seven age-matched control patients, systolic and diastolic function was analysed by pressure-volume loops at baseline heart rate and during atrial pacing to 100 and 120 min(-1). At baseline, relaxation was prolonged and end-diastolic left ventricular stiffness was higher in HFNEF, whereas all parameters of systolic function were not different from control patients. This resulted in smaller end-diastolic volumes, higher end-diastolic pressure, and a lower stroke volume and cardiac index in HFNEF vs. control patients. During pacing, frequency-dependent upregulation of contractility indices (+dP/dt(max) and Ees) occurred similarly in HFNEF and control patients, but frequency-dependent acceleration of relaxation (dP/dt(min)) was blunted in HFNEF. In HFNEF, end-diastolic volume and stroke volume decreased with higher heart rates while both remained unchanged in control patients.

CONCLUSION

In HFNEF, frequency-dependent upregulation of cardiac output is blunted. This results from progressive volume unloading of the left ventricle due to limited relaxation reserve in combination with increased LV passive stiffness, despite preserved force-frequency relation.

Current concepts of neurohormonal activation in heart failure: mediators and mechanisms

Neurohormonal activation is a commonly cited array of phenomena in the body's physiologic response to heart failure. Although various neurohormones and pharmacologic agents that moderate their pathophysiologic effects have been reviewed in the nursing literature, both the mechanisms of neurohormonal system activation and cellular and organ system effects have been described only in brief. Accordingly, this article reviews mechanisms of neurohormonal activation and describes cellular and cardiovascular effects of the (1) sympathetic nervous system, (2) renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system, (3) kallikrein-kininogen-kinin system, (4) vasopressinergic system, (5) natriuretic peptide systems, and (6) endothelin in the context of heart failure. This article implicitly details the physiologic basis for numerous current and potential future pharmacologic agents used in the management of heart failure. It is intended that this article be used as a reference for advanced clinical nursing practice, research, and education.

Hemodynamic characteristics of patients with diastolic heart failure and hypertension

Diastolic heart failure (DHF) has different underlying pathophysiologic mechanisms. We sought to compare hemodynamic characteristics in DHF patients with or without hypertension. A conductance catheter with microtip-manometer was used to measure left ventricular (LV) function and hemodynamics in 28 DHF patients. After baseline measurements, nitroglycerin was infused to alter the loading condition and the measurements were repeated. At baseline, end-systolic pressure was higher and the time constant of LV relaxation (tau) was longer in hypertensive DHF patients. Patients in hypertensive DHF had lower LV-arterial coupling ratio than those in non-hypertensive DHF. The peak of loading sequence was in early systole in non-hypertensive DHF patients and in late systole in hypertensive DHF patients. Nitroglycerin decreased LV end-systolic pressure and end-diastolic volume in both groups. In non-hypertensive DHF, nitroglycerin significantly reduced stroke volume and shortened tau (59+/-11 vs. 54+/-10 ms, p<0.05) without any changes in the time to peak LV force, effective arterial elastance (E(a)), or LV-arterial coupling ratio. In contrast, in hypertensive DHF patients, nitroglycerin significantly reduced E(a) and shortened the time to peak LV force, resulting in an improved LV-arterial coupling ratio, preserved stroke volume and shortened tau (75+/-14 vs. 62+/-13 ms, p<0.05). In conclusion, LV relaxation was more prolonged in hypertensive DHF patients than non-hypertensive DHF patients, partly because of the different loading sequence. Changing the loading condition by nitroglycerin improved LV systolic and diastolic function in hypertensive DHF patients.

Hypertension and heart failure: a dysfunction of systole, diastole or both?

The pathological myocardial hypertrophy associated with hypertension contains the seed for further maladaptive development. Increased myocardial oxygen consumption, impaired epicardial coronary perfusion, ventricular fibrosis and remodelling, abnormalities in long-axis function and torsion, cause, to a varying degree, a mixture of systolic and diastolic abnormalities. In addition, chronotropic incompetence and peripheral factors such as lack of vasodilator reserve and reduced arterial compliance further affect cardiac output particularly on exercise. Many of these factors are common to hypertensive heart failure with a normal ejection fraction as well as systolic heart failure. There is increasing evidence that these apparently separate phenotypes are part of a spectrum of heart failure differing only in the degree of ventricular remodelling and volume changes. Furthermore, dichotomizing heart failure into systolic and diastolic clinical entities has led to a paucity of clinical trials of therapies for heart failure with a normal ejection fraction. Therapies aimed at reversing myocardial fibrosis, and targets outside the heart such as enhancing vasodilator reserve and improving chronotropic incompetence deserve further study and may improve the exercise capacity of hypertensive heart failure patients. Hypertension heart disease with heart failure is simply not a dysfunction of systole and diastole. Other peripheral factors including heart rate and vasodilator response with exercise may deserve equal attention in an attempt to develop more effective treatments for this disorder.

Prognostic value of left-ventricular and peripheral vascular performance in patients with dilated cardiomyopathy

BACKGROUND

The goal of the heart during exercise is to increase cardiac output to metabolizing tissues. Our aim was to assess the relative role of systolic versus diastolic dysfunction in modulating cardiac output in patients with idiopathic left-ventricular (LV) dysfunction.

METHODS

We enrolled 51 patients (LV ejection fraction, mean +/- SD, = 36% +/- 9%) and 24 controls with a normal LV ejection fraction. All were scheduled for exercise radionuclide angiography for the evaluation of LV functional reserve, and were followed for a median of 129 months.

RESULTS

Stroke volume increased in control subjects mainly through a decrease in end-systolic volume, while it increased in patients through an increase in end-diastolic volume (EDV), albeit heterogeneously. Patients were divided into group I, with stroke volume increase, versus group II, without stroke volume increase, during stress. Despite similar blunted inotropic reserves, group I showed a decrease in arterial elastance during stress: a better ventricular-arterial coupling occurred, leading to increased cardiac efficiency. At long-term follow-up, the overall event-free survival was 88% in group I, compared with 61% for group II (log rank = 4.7, P = .03).

CONCLUSIONS

In the presence of idiopathic LV dysfunction, a preserved LV pumping reserve can be identified easily through stress-induced variations in the EDV and stroke volume, with a powerful, long-term death-risk stratification.

Role of left ventricular stiffness in heart failure with normal ejection fraction

BACKGROUND

Increased left ventricular stiffness is a distinct finding in patients who have heart failure with normal ejection fraction (HFNEF). To elucidate how diastolic dysfunction contributes to heart failure symptomatology during exercise, we conducted a study using an invasive pressure-volume loop approach and measured cardiac function at rest and during atrial pacing and handgrip exercise.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Patients with HFNEF (n=70) and patients without heart failure symptoms (n=20) were enrolled. Pressure-volume loops were measured with a conductance catheter during basal conditions, handgrip exercise, and atrial pacing with 120 bpm to analyze diastolic and systolic left ventricular function. During transient preload reduction, the diastolic stiffness constant was measured directly. Diastolic function with increased stiffness was significantly impaired in patients with HFNEF during basal conditions. This was associated with increased end-diastolic pressures during handgrip exercise and with decreased stroke volume and a leftward shift of pressure-volume loops during atrial pacing.

CONCLUSIONS

Increased left ventricular stiffness contributed to increased end-diastolic pressure during handgrip exercise and decreased stroke volume during atrial pacing in patients with HFNEF. These data suggest that left ventricular stiffness modulates cardiac function in HFNEF patients and suggests that diastolic dysfunction with increased stiffness is a target for treating HFNEF.