Management of ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction in EDs

Psychological and metabolic risk factors in older adults with a previous history of eating disorder: A cross-sectional study from the Predimed-Plus study

GOALS

To explore affective and cognitive status, later in life, in individuals with and without previous history of eating disorder (ED), and also its association with higher risk for metabolic syndrome (MetS) symptomatology.

METHODS

A cross-sectional analysis of 6756 adults, aged 55-75 years with overweight/obesity and MetS participating in the Predimed-Plus study was conducted. Participants completed self-reported questionnaires to examine lifetime history of ED, according to DSM-5 criteria, and other psychopathological and neurocognitive factors. Anthropometric and metabolic measurements were also collected.

RESULTS

Of the whole sample, 24 individuals (0.35%) reported a previous history of ED. In this subsample, there were more women and singles compared to their counterparts, but they also presented higher levels of depressive symptoms and higher cognitive impairment, but also higher body mass index (BMI) and severe obesity, than those without lifetime ED.

CONCLUSIONS

This is one of the first studies to analyse the cognitive and metabolic impact of a previous history of ED. The results showed that previous ED was associated with greater affective and cognitive impairment, but also with higher BMI, later in life. No other MetS risk factors were found, after controlling for relevant variables.

Helicopter transport effectiveness of patients for primary percutaneous coronary intervention

BACKGROUND

For patients with ST-elevated myocardial infarction (STEMI), time to primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is an important factor in saving myocardium. Helicopter emergency medical service (HEMS) has become a vital component in regionalized cardiac care. The objective of this study is to assess the logistics of HEMS and ground EMS for interfacility transport of STEMI patients for primary PCI and to determine the effectiveness of HEMS transports in terms of the number of lives saved per 100 flights.

METHODS

This is a retrospective database and records review of interfacility transports of STEMI patients for primary PCI to a single medical center. The study period consisted of 18 months (January 2010 through June 2011).

RESULTS

Ninety-seven of 120 patients met the criteria for review. Of these, 66% were transported by HEMS. The pretransport patient handling times were similar for the HEMS and ground EMS groups. Door-to-PCI in < 120 minutes was achieved in 35.5% (11 of 31) of ground EMS and 24.2% (16 of 66) of HEMS. Patients transported by ground EMS were more likely to get to PCI in < 90 minutes (9.7%, 3 of 31). HEMS patients traveled significantly farther distances, 51 miles (IQR 43-68) than ground EMS, 37 miles (IQR 18-51). This equates to a 38% longer distance for patients transported by HEMS. An estimate of the driving time for HEMS-transported patients suggests HEMS transports saved a median of 41 minutes (IQR 33-48). The proportion of HEMS flights saving more than 30 minutes was 78.8% (95% CI 67.0-87.9%).

CONCLUSION

The results did not show a time savings for HEMS- versus ground EMS-transported patients. When estimates of time spent for ground EMS of actual HEMS transported patients are analyzed, HEMS provides a median savings of 41 minutes, with a savings of at least 30 minutes in 78.8% of the HEMS patients. Based on estimates used in this study, conservative calculations arrived at a time-based mortality effectiveness of HEMS of about 1.2 lives saved per 100 flights.

Helicopter EMS: Research Endpoints and Potential Benefits

Patients, EMS systems, and healthcare regions benefit from Helicopter EMS (HEMS) utilization. This article discusses these benefits in terms of specific endpoints utilized in research projects. The endpoint of interest, be it primary, secondary, or surrogate, is important to understand in the deployment of HEMS resources or in planning further HEMS outcomes research. The most important outcomes are those which show potential benefits to the patients, such as functional survival, pain relief, and earlier ALS care. Case reports are also important "outcomes" publications. The benefits of HEMS in the rural setting is the ability to provide timely access to Level I or Level II trauma centers and in nontrauma, interfacility transport of cardiac, stroke, and even sepsis patients. Many HEMS crews have pharmacologic and procedural capabilities that bring a different level of care to a trauma scene or small referring hospital, especially in the rural setting. Regional healthcare and EMS system's benefit from HEMS by their capability to extend the advanced level of care throughout a region, provide a "backup" for areas with limited ALS coverage, minimize transport times, make available direct transport to specialized centers, and offer flexibility of transport in overloaded hospital systems.

Factors associated with delayed hospital arrival among patients with acute myocardial infarction: a cross-sectional study in Greece

BACKGROUND

It is proven that early admission to hospital contributes significantly to the successful management of acute myocardial infarction (AMI).

AIM

This study aimed to examine the factors associated with delayed hospital arrival among patients with AMI.

METHODS

A cross-sectional study among 477 AMI patients was conducted during a 2-year period in two large tertiary hospitals in Greece. Structured face-to-face interviews were conducted and information regarding their socio-demographic characteristics, medical history and factors that might be correlated with delayed hospital arrival were collected.

RESULTS

The main factors that were found to be correlated with delayed hospital arrival among AMI patients were the absence of companion/attendant/escort present during the AMI [odds ratio (OR) 2.1, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.98-4.4, P = 0.049], previous medical history of diabetes mellitus (OR 3.4, CI 1.6-7.2, P = 0.002), absence of dyspepsia (OR 9.2, CI 3.6-23.3, P < 0.001) and nausea/vomiting symptoms (OR 16.9, CI 4.1-69.1, P < 0.001), and also being at a distance of more than 10 km from the hospital (OR 19.6, CI 5.4-70.6, P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

A number of factors that might delay hospital arrival among patients with AMI should be taken into account in healthcare service planning. Health policy actions that will improve the accessibility to healthcare services, the restructuring of the Greek primary healthcare system and the provision of effective patient education by nurses could reduce the pre-hospital delay.

LIMITATIONS

The study was conducted in two hospitals which limits the generalization of the findings. Also, the onset of AMI symptoms relied on self-report by the patients.

Inappropriate dispatcher decision for emergency medical service users with acute myocardial infarction

OBJECTIVES

Current guidelines recommend utilization of prehospital emergency medical services (EMSs) by patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). The aims of this study were to estimate the percentage of inappropriate initial dispatcher decisions and determine their impact on delays in reperfusion therapy for EMS users with STEMI.

METHODS

As part of a prospective regional registry of patients with STEMI, we analyzed the original data for 245 patients who called a university hospital-affiliated EMS call center in France. The primary study outcome was time to reperfusion therapy calculated from the documented date and time of the first patient call.

RESULTS

The initial EMS dispatcher's decision was appropriate (ie, dispatching a mobile intensive care unit staffed by an emergency or critical care physician) for 171 (70%) patients and inappropriate for 74 (30%) patients. Inappropriate decisions included referring the patient to a family physician (n = 59), providing medical advice (n = 9), and dispatching an ambulance (n = 6). Inappropriate initial decisions resulted in increased median time to reperfusion for 140 patients receiving fibrinolysis (95 vs 53 minutes; P < .001) and 91 patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention (170 vs 107 minutes; P < .001). In-hospital mortality was not different between the 2 study groups (6.8% vs 9.9%; P = .42).

CONCLUSION

The initial dispatcher's decision is inappropriate for 30% of EMS users with STEMI and results in substantial delays in time to reperfusion therapy. Accuracy of telephone triage should be improved for patients who activate EMSs in response to symptoms suggestive of acute coronary syndrome.