Young patients with chest pain: 1-year outcomes

Symptoms and healthcare contact preceding sudden cardiac death in persons aged 1-49 years

Sudden Cardiac Death (SCD) is a leading cause of death among persons in their youth and early middle-age. To prevent SCD it is crucial to identify persons at high-risk of SCD. Knowledge of symptoms and medical contact prior to SCD could potentially aid in the identification of high-risk persons in the general population who would benefit from further investigation. This review aims to summarize the current knowledge of symptoms and healthcare contact preceding SCD in persons aged 1-49 years, and to explore how the symptoms differ according to SCD cause and age of the deceased. There was a high frequency of both cardiac and non-specific symptoms prior to SCD. Additionally, many SCD victims contacted the healthcare system prior to death on the basis of their symptoms and only a few were diagnosed with cardiovascular disease. This information underlines that young persons reporting potential cardiac symptoms should also be thoroughly examined. Furthermore, such symptoms could be used in combination with other easily accessible information in non-invasive prediction models aiming at identifying persons at high risk of SCD that would benefit from further investigation and possibly treatment.

Hospital Admissions for Chest Pain Associated with Cocaine Use in the United States

BACKGROUND

The outcomes related to chest pain associated with cocaine use and its burden on the healthcare system are not well studied.

METHODS

Data were collected from the Nationwide Inpatient Sample (2001-2012). Subjects were identified by using the International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification codes. Primary outcome was a composite of mortality, myocardial infarction, stroke, and cardiac arrest.

RESULTS

We identified 363,143 admissions for cocaine-induced chest pain. Mean age was 44.9 (±21.1) years with male predominance. Left heart catheterizations were performed in 6.7%, whereas the frequency of acute myocardial infarction and percutaneous coronary interventions were 0.69% and 0.22%, respectively. The in-hospital mortality was 0.09%, and the primary outcome occurred in 1.19% of patients. Statistically significant predictors of primary outcome included female sex (odds ratio [OR], 1.16; confidence interval [CI], 1.00-1.35; P = .046), age >50 years (OR, 1.24, CI, 1.07-1.43; P = .004), history of heart failure (OR, 1.63, CI, 1.37-1.93; P <.001), supraventricular tachycardia (OR, 2.94, CI, 1.34-6.42; P = .007), endocarditis (OR, 3.5, CI, 1.50-8.18, P = .004), tobacco use (OR, 1.3, CI, 1.13-1.49; P <.001), dyslipidemia (OR, 1.5, CI, 1.29-1.77; P <.001), coronary artery disease (OR, 2.37, CI, 2.03-2.76; P <.001), and renal failure (OR, 1.27, CI, 1.08-1.50; P = .005). The total annual projected economic burden ranged from $155 to $226 million with a cumulative accruement of more than $2 billion over a decade.

CONCLUSION

Hospital admissions due to chest pain and concomitant cocaine use are associated with low rates of adverse outcomes. For the low-risk cohort in whom acute coronary syndrome has been ruled out, hospitalization may not be beneficial and may result in unnecessary cardiac procedures.

Clinical risk factors alone are inadequate for predicting significant coronary artery disease

OBJECTIVE

We sought to derive and validate a model for identifying suspected ACS patients harboring undiagnosed significant coronary artery disease (CAD).

METHODS

This was a secondary analysis of data from a randomized control trial (RCT). Patients randomized to the CTA arm of an RCT examining a CTA-based strategy for ruling-out acute coronary syndrome (ACS) constitute the derivation cohort, which was randomly divided into a training dataset (2/3, used for model derivation) and a test dataset (1/3, used for internal validation (IV)). ED patients from a different center receiving CTA to evaluate for suspected ACS constitute the external validation (EV) cohort. Primary outcome was CTA-assessed significant CAD (stenosis of ≥50% in a major coronary artery).

RESULTS

In the derivation cohort, 11.2% (76/679) of subjects had CTA-assessed significant CAD, and in the EV cohort, 8.2% of subjects (87/1056) had CTA-assessed significant CAD. Age was the strongest predictor of significant CAD among the clinical risk factors examined. Predictor variables included in the derived logistic regression model were: age, sex, tobacco use, diabetes, and race. This model exhibited an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC AUC) of 0.72 (95% CI: 0.61-0.83) based on IV, and 0.76 (95% CI: 0.70, 0.82) based on EV. The derived random forest model based on clinical risk factors yielded improved but not sufficient discrimination of significant CAD (ROC AUC = 0.76 [95% CI: 0.67-0.85] based on IV). Coronary artery calcium score was a more accurate predictor of significant CAD than any combination of clinical risk factors (ROC AUC = 0.85 [95% CI: 0.76-0.94] based on IV; ROC AUC = 0.92 [95% CI: 0.88-0.95] based on EV).

CONCLUSIONS

Clinical risk factors, either individually or in combination, are insufficient for accurately identifying suspected ACS patients harboring undiagnosed significant coronary artery disease.

Diagnostic Yield of Routine Stress Testing in Low and Intermediate Risk Chest Pain Patients Under 40 Years: A Systematic Review

OBJECTIVE

Chest pain is one of the most frequent causes for presentation to emergency departments (EDs). The majority of patients will undergo diagnostic workup including stress testing to rule out an acute coronary syndrome, but very few patients will be diagnosed with a cardiac cause for their pain. Patients under 40 years represent a lower risk group in which routine stress testing may be of little benefit. This systematic review sought to determine the diagnostic yield of routine stress testing in low- and intermediate-risk chest pain patients under 40 years.

METHODS

Electronic databases were searched for relevant studies. The quality of the included primary studies was assessed using the National Health and Medical Research Council evidence hierarchy and the McMaster Critical Appraisal Tool for Quantitative Studies. Descriptive statistics summarized the findings.

RESULTS

Five primary studies were included in the review (all level III-3 evidence); 7 additional sources of relevant data were also included. Diagnostic yield of routine stress testing in low- and intermediate-risk patients under 40 years is reported between 0% and 1.1%. Combined data from included primary studies demonstrated just 4 out of 1683 true positive stress tests (0.24%), only one of which was definitively confirmed by coronary angiogram; additional data sources identified just 1 out of 310 true positive stress tests (0.32%).

CONCLUSIONS

Diagnostic yield of routine stress testing in low- and intermediate-risk chest pain patients under 40 years is low. However, better quality studies are required to be able to draw definitive conclusions.

Clinical decision aids for chest pain in the emergency department: identifying low-risk patients

Chest pain is one of the most common presenting complaints in the emergency department, though only a small minority of patients are subsequently diagnosed with acute coronary syndrome (ACS). However, missing the diagnosis has potential for significant morbidity and mortality. ACS presentations can be atypical, and their workups are often prolonged and costly. In order to risk-stratify patients and better direct the workup and care given, many decision aids have been developed. While each may have merit in certain clinical settings, the most useful aid in the emergency department is one that finds all cases of ACS while also identifying a substantial subset of patients at low risk who can be discharged without stress testing or coronary angiography. This review describes several of the chest pain decision aids developed and studied through the recent past, starting with the thrombolysis in myocardial infarction (TIMI) risk score and Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events (GRACE) scores, which were developed as prognostic aids for patients already diagnosed with ACS, then subsequently validated in the undifferentiated chest pain population. Asia-Pacific Evaluation of Chest Pain Trial (ASPECT); Accelerated Diagnostic Protocol to Assess Patients With Chest Pain Symptoms Using Contemporary Troponins (ADAPT); North American Chest Pain Rule (NACPR); and History, Electrocardiogram, Age, Risk factors, Troponin (HEART) score have been developed exclusively for use in the undifferentiated chest pain population as well, with improved performance compared to their predecessors. This review describes the relative merits and limitations of these decision aids so that providers can determine which tool fits the needs of their clinical practice setting.

Diagnostic values of chest pain history, ECG, troponin and clinical gestalt in patients with chest pain and potential acute coronary syndrome assessed in the emergency department

In the assessment of chest pain patients with suspected acute coronary syndrome (ACS) in the emergency department (ED), physicians rely on global diagnostic impressions (‘gestalt’). The aim of this study was to determine the diagnostic value of the ED physician’s overall assessment of ACS likelihood, and the values of the main diagnostic modalities underlying this assessment, namely the chest pain history, the ECG and the initial troponin result. 1,151 consecutive ED chest pain patients were prospectively included. The ED physician’s interpretation of the chest pain history, the ECG, and the global likelihood of ACS were recorded on special forms. The discharge diagnoses were retrieved from the medical records. A chart review was carried out to determine whether patients with a non-ACS diagnosis at the index visit had ACS or suffered cardiac death within 30 days. The gestalt was better than its components both at ruling in (“Obvious ACS”, LR 29) and at ruling out (“No Suspicion of ACS”, LR 0.01) ACS. In the “Strong suspicion of ACS” group, 60% of the patients did not have ACS. A positive TnT (LR 24.9) and an ischemic ECG (LR 8.3) were strong predictors of ACS and seemed superior to pain history for ruling in ACS. In patients with a normal TnT and non-ischemic ECG, chest pain history typical of AMI was not a significant predictor of AMI (LR 1.9) while pain history typical of unstable angina (UA) was a moderate predictor of UA (LR 4.7). Clinical gestalt was better than its components both at ruling in and at ruling out ACS, but overestimated the likelihood of ACS when cases were assessed as strong suspicion of ACS. Among the components of the gestalt, TnT and ECG were superior to the chest pain history for ruling in ACS, while pain history was superior for ruling out ACS.

Avoidable utilization of the chest pain observation unit: evaluation of very-low-risk patients

BACKGROUND

Very-low-risk patients treated in a chest pain observation unit (CPOU) may threaten efficient care delivery. To optimize the efficiency of CPOU evaluations, it is necessary to quantify the avoidable CPOU utilization rate, examine physician variability, and determine patient and physician characteristics associated with avoidable CPOU utilization.

METHODS

Consecutive chest pain patients were evaluated in an Emergency Department-based CPOU. Patients were risk stratified based on the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association framework, age, and electrocardiogram findings. Very-low-risk was defined as age <35, physician assessment of low-risk, and normal or nondiagnostic electrocardiogram. Patients identified as very-low-risk were considered avoidable CPOU evaluations. Individual physicians' avoidable CPOU utilization rates were calculated. Patients were followed for 30-day major adverse cardiac events, defined as the composite of death, acute myocardial infarction, and coronary revascularization.

RESULTS

Over 33 months, the registry included 1731 chest pain patients. The study definition of avoidable CPOU evaluations was met by 174 patients (10.1%, 95% confidence interval: 8.7-11.6%). The median rate of physician's avoidable CPOU utilization was 10% (interquartile range: 5.9-13.6%) and varied from 1.9% to 18.4%. None of the patients with an avoidable CPOU evaluation had a major adverse cardiac events within 30 days. Physician predictors of avoidable CPOU utilization included recent residency graduation (<5 years), part-time status, and moderate or high rates of CPOU use.

CONCLUSIONS

Approximately 10% of CPOU evaluations were avoidable. Wide variability exists among physicians regarding their individual rates of avoidable CPOU utilization. This variability could represent an opportunity to improve the efficiency of CPOU care delivery.

Low-risk chest pain patients younger than 40 years do not benefit from admission and stress testing

BACKGROUND

A number of studies have suggested clinical decision rules for patients age <40 who are at low risk for acute coronary syndrome (ACS) and may be safe for discharge from the emergency department. Despite this, many such patients continue to be admitted for observation in low-risk observation units. We hypothesized that patients age <40 without coronary artery disease, with a nonischemic electrocardiogram (ECG), and normal initial troponin I (TnI) who are admitted to a CPU are at very low risk (<1%) for ACS or 30-day major adverse cardiac event (MACE) and would not benefit from observation care.

METHODS

This was a prospective, observational study of consecutive patients admitted to the CPU in a large-volume academic urban emergency department. Eligibility criteria included age >18 but <40, American Heart Association low-to-intermediate risk, nonischemic ECGs, and normal initial TnI. Standard descriptive statistics were used for demographics, cardiac comorbidities, and risk scores. Our primary outcomes were CPU ACS rate and 30-day MACE. MACE was defined as death, nonfatal AMI, revascularization, or out of hospital cardiac arrest. A sample size of at least 400 was chosen to have 1% precision about an expected outcome rate of 0.3% (based on prior CPU data of patients of all ages). Confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using the refined Wilson simple asymptotic method with continuity correction. All patients were called at 30 days. All charts on index visit and any subsequent visit within 30 days were reviewed using standardized chart abstractions forms by 2 trained abstractors blinded to the hypothesis of the study. A Social Security Death Index search was performed on all patients.

RESULTS

Three hundred eighty-four patients accounting for 403 CPU admissions were enrolled over a 28-month period. Mean age was 34.3 ± 4.5; 42% were women; and 89%, 8%, 2%, and 1% had Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction scores of 0, 1, 2, and 3, respectively. No patient had an abnormal TnI. The ACS rate was 0 (95% CI, 0-0.8%). The 30-day MACE rate was 0 (95% CI, 0-0.8%). Forty-two percentage of these patients received stress testing but 0 (95% CI, 0-1.8%) were positive.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients age <40 with a normal ECG and normal first biomarker have <1% risk of ACS or 30-day MACE, such that admission and stress testing are of no benefit.

Comparison of clinical features and outcomes of patients with acute myocardial infarction younger than 35 years with those older than 65 years

PURPOSE

The objective of this study was to analyze the clinical characteristics of patients younger than 35 years with acute myocardial infarction (AMI).

METHODS

A total of 117 patients younger than 35 years with AMI admitted to the hospital during the recent 10 years were chosen, and 355 patients older than 65 years with AMI served as a control group. The case history, clinical data, coronary angiography and prognosis of the patients were analyzed and compared.

RESULTS

Among the younger patients with AMI, men (96.6%) and those smoking cigarettes (66.7%) account for the majority. ST-segment elevation (69.2%) and anterior wall infarction (43.6%) were more prevalent in the younger patients than in the older patients. Compared with the older patients, the younger patients had a higher level of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (2.93 ± 1.48 versus 2.35 ± 1.21, P = 0.0428) and higher left ventricular ejection fraction (59.82 ± 10.86 versus 48.31 ± 12.48, P = 0.0396). Coronary angiography data showed that most of the younger patients were characteristic of having single-vessel lesion (66.7%), left anterior descending artery lesion (69.3%) and coronary artery spasm more than the older patients (6.8% versus 0.56%, P = 0.0001). In addition, the in-hospital mortality, and the prognosis after 1 and 12 months in the younger patients were comparatively better.

CONCLUSIONS

The main risk factors for young adults aged <35 years with AMI include cigarette smoking, hyperlipidemia and family history of coronary artery disease, and smoking cessation and lifestyle improvement are important considerations for the prevention of this disease in this population.

HEART score to further risk stratify patients with low TIMI scores

OBJECTIVE

The ability to risk stratify patients presenting to the emergency department (ED) with potential acute coronary syndrome (ACS) is critical. The thrombolysis in myocardial infarction (TIMI) risk score can risk stratify ED patients with potential ACS but cannot identify patients safe for ED discharge. The symptom-based HEART score identifies very low-risk patients. Our hypothesis was that patients with a TIMI score of 0 or 1 may be stratified further with the HEART score to identify a group of patients at less than 1% risk of 30-day cardiovascular events.

METHODS

We conducted a secondary analysis of a prospective cohort study in a tertiary care hospital ED. Patients with potential ACS who were >30 years of age were included. Data collected included demographics, history, electrocardiogram, laboratories, and components of the TIMI and HEART scores. Follow-up was conducted by structured record review and phone. The main outcome was a composite of death, acute myocardial infarction, or revascularization at 30 days.

RESULTS

There were 8815 patients enrolled (mean age, 52.8 ± 15.1 years; 57% women, and 69% black). At 30 days, the composite event rate was 8.0% (660 patients): 108 deaths, 410 acute myocardial infarction, and 301 revascularizations. Of the 485 patients with both a TIMI score of 0 and a HEART score of 0, there were no cardiovascular events (95% confidence interval, 0-0.8%); but no other score combination had an upper limit confidence interval less than 1%.

CONCLUSION

At all levels of TIMI score, the HEART score was able to further substratify patients with respect to 30-day risk. A HEART score of 0 in a patient with a TIMI of 0 identified a group of patients at less than 1% risk for 30-day adverse events.

Cardiac symptoms before sudden cardiac death caused by coronary artery disease: a nationwide study among young Danish people

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this nationwide case-control study was to identify and characterise symptoms before sudden death of young persons who had died due to coronary artery disease (CAD).

METHODS

We have previously investigated the incidence of sudden cardiac death (SCD) in young Danish people aged 1-35 years in Denmark during 2000-2006. We included all deaths (n=6629) and identified 314 autopsied cases of SCD, 40 of whom (13%) died from CAD. To compare symptoms before death, the CAD case group was sex- and age-matched 1:2 with a control group randomly sampled from a population of 1497 individuals who had died in accidents. We used data from the National Patient Registry on previous contacts with the healthcare system for all persons and read all available patient records, including death certificates and autopsy reports.

RESULTS

A total of 31 (79%) persons with CAD-SCD had cardiac symptoms such as angina pectoris (n=24, 62%) and dyspnoea during the 12 months before death, and this was significantly higher than in the control group (p<0.001). In the case group, 18 persons (46%) had contacts with the healthcare system for cardiac symptoms before death, and this was also significantly higher than the control group (p<0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

In this nationwide study we found that 62% of young persons with SCD experienced angina before death, and nearly half of them who died of CAD had sought medical attention within the last year before death.

Risk stratification in chest pain patients undergoing nuclear stress testing: the Erlanger Stress Score

BACKGROUND

Studies have individually reported the relationship of age, cardiac risk factors, and history of preexisting coronary artery disease (CAD) for predicting acute coronary syndromes in chest pain patients undergoing cardiac stress testing. In this study, we investigate the interplay of all these factors on the incidence of acute coronary syndromes to develop a tool that may assist physicians in the selection of appropriate chest pain patients for stress testing.

METHODS

Retrospective analysis of a prospectively acquired database of consecutive chest pain patients undergoing nuclear stress testing. Backward stepwise logistic regression was used to develop a model for predicting risk of 30-day acute coronary events (ACE) using information obtained from age, sex, cardiac risk factors, and history of preexisting CAD.

RESULTS

A total of 800 chest pain patients underwent nuclear stress testing. ACE occurred in 74 patients (9.3%). Logistic regression analysis found only 6 factors predictive of ACE: age, male sex, preexisting CAD, diabetes, and hyperlipidemia. Area under the receiver operator characteristic curve of this model for predicting ACE was 0.767 (95% confidence interval, 0.719-0.815). There were no cases of ACE in the 173 patients with predicted probability estimates ≤2.5% (95% confidence interval, 0%-2.1%).

CONCLUSIONS

A regression model using age, sex, preexisting CAD, diabetes, and hyperlipidemia is predictive of 30-day ACE in chest pain patients undergoing nuclear stress testing. Prospective studies need to be performed to determine whether this model can assist physicians in the selection of appropriate low-to-intermediate risk chest pain patients for nuclear stress testing.

A simple clinical model to estimate the probability of Marfan syndrome

BACKGROUND

Marfan syndrome is a heritable connective tissue disease. Definitive diagnosis is complex, and requires sequencing of a large gene, FBN1.

AIM

We aimed to develop a simple model to estimate the pre-test probability of Marfan syndrome.

DESIGN

Prospective cross-sectional study.

METHODS

We applied diagnostic standards for definitive diagnosis or exclusion of Marfan syndrome in 329 consecutive persons. In 208 persons with random assignment to our derivation group, we performed multivariate logistic regression to assess 14 clinical variables for inclusion in a prediction model with derivation of score points from the estimated coefficients. We created cut-offs to classify low, moderate and high probability of Marfan syndrome. For validation, we applied the model to the remaining 121 persons.

RESULTS

We identified seven variables for inclusion in the final model, where we assigned four score points to ectopia lentis, two points to a family history of Marfan syndrome, and one point to previous thoracic aortic surgery, to pectus excavatum, to a wrist and thumb sign, to previous pneumothorax, and to skin striae. In the derivation group 12, 42 and 92% of persons with low (≤1 point), moderate (>1-3.5 points) or high pre-test probability (>3.5 points) had Marfan syndrome, compared to 12, 57 and 91%, respectively, in the validation group. Positive likelihood ratios were 13.96 and 8.54 in the high probability group of the derivation and validation group, respectively.

CONCLUSION

A simple prediction model provides evidence for Marfan syndrome. This model can be used to identify patients who require definitive diagnostic work-up.

The evolution of chest pain pathways

Patients presenting to the emergency department with chest pain require prompt identification and referral, as early treatment of patients with an acute coronary syndrome (ACS) is crucial to decrease morbidity and mortality (Steurer et al, Emerg Med J. 2010;27:896-902). Although rule-in ACS is critical and time dependant, other difficulties arise during the rule-out ACS process (Steurer et al, Emerg Med J. 2010;27:896-902). Inappropriate discharge of patients with misdiagnosed acute myocardial infarction is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Concerns relating to inappropriate discharge result in readmission with resultant lengthy hospital stays, high costs, and contribute to overcrowding and bed block (Amsterdam et al, J Am Coll Cardiol. 2002;40:251-256; Cardiol Clin. 2005;23:503-516; Furtado et al, Emerg Med. In press; Karlson, Am J Cardiol. 1991;68:171-175; Ng et al, Am J Cardiol. 2001;88:611-617; Ramakrishna et al, Mayo Clin Proc. 2005;80:322-329; Stowers, Crit Pathw Cardiol. 2003;2:88-94). The challenge of chest pain diagnosis has led to a number of associated problems within the health care system. The growing need for improvements in consistency of patient care, resource efficiency, and quality of patient healthcare has led to the development of chest pain pathways (Erhardt et al, Eur Heart J. 2002;23:1153-1176). The development and implementation of chest pain pathways is not without difficulties. These may arise from differences in the management approaches of health practitioners, poor adherence to guidelines, and concerns for costs. New procedures such as new cardiac injury markers, stress testing, and specialized chest pain units have led to a reduction in admission rates and length of stay, reduced costs, and a reduction of inappropriate discharge of patients with ischemic heart disease.