Estimates of sedation in patients undergoing endotracheal intubation in US EDs

Postintubation Sedation of Pediatric Patients in the Emergency Department: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

CONTEXT

Postintubation sedation is a critical intervention for patients undergoing mechanical ventilation. Research in the intensive care unit (ICU) and adult emergency department (ED) demonstrates that appropriate postintubation sedation has a significant impact on patient outcomes. There are minimal published data regarding postintubation sedation for pediatric ED patients.

OBJECTIVE

To identify, describe, and critique published literature on postintubation sedation in pediatric ED patients.

DATA SOURCES

Embase, Ovid Medline, Scopus, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, and ClinicalTrials.Gov.

STUDY SELECTION

Studies describing postintubation sedation in the ED for pediatric patients (<18 years of age) intubated in the ED via rapid sequence intubation (RSI) were included. Studies reporting intubation outside the ED, intubation not by RSI, or nonpediatric patients were excluded, as were studies not reporting novel human clinical research.

DATA EXTRACTION

Data were abstracted by 2 authors using a standardized worksheet. Data included study design & setting, demographics, medications for RSI and postintubation sedation, administration of any or appropriately timed postintubation sedation, and predictive factors for postintubation sedation-related outcomes.

RESULTS

A total of 10 studies were included, all of which were nonrandomized; there was significant heterogeneity and many key variables and outcomes were not consistently reported. Meta-analysis of eligible studies demonstrated pooled estimates of 77.3% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 62.5-92.0) for proportion of patients receiving any postintubation sedation, 43.5% (95% CI: 29.3-57.6) for proportion of patients receiving appropriately timed postintubation sedation, and 18.6 minutes (95% CI: 12.5-24.7) for median time to postintubation sedation, all with significant heterogeneity.

CONCLUSIONS

Data on postintubation sedation in pediatric ED patients are limited. Administration of postintubation sedation is inconsistent and may be substantially delayed. Further high-quality research into the use of postintubation sedation in this setting is needed, and appropriate postintubation sedation should be a target for quality improvement.

National Trends in Emergency Department Visits for Suicide Attempts and Intentional Self-Harm

OBJECTIVE

This study estimated national annual trends and characteristics of emergency department visits for suicide attempts and intentional self-harm in the United States from 2011 to 2020.

METHODS

Data were from the National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey, an annual cross-sectional national sample survey of emergency departments. Visits for suicide attempts and intentional self-harm were identified using discharge diagnosis codes (ICD-9-CM for 2011-2015; ICD-10-CM for 2016-2020) or reason-for-visit codes. The annual proportion of emergency department visits for suicide attempts and intentional self-harm was estimated.

RESULTS

The weighted number of emergency department visits for suicide attempts and intentional self-harm increased from 1.43 million, or 0.6% of total emergency department visits, in 2011-2012 to 5.37 million, or 2.1% of total emergency department visits in 2019-2020 (average annual percent change, 19.5%, 95% CI=16.9, 22.2). Visits per capita increased from 261 to 871 visits per 100,000 persons (average annual percent change, 18.8%, 95% CI=17.6, 20.0). The increase in visits was widely distributed across sociodemographic groups. While suicide attempt and intentional self-harm visits were most common among adolescents, adults age 65 or older demonstrated the largest increase (average annual percent change, 30.2%, 95% CI=28.5, 32.0). Drug-related diagnoses were the most common co-occurring diagnosis among suicide attempt and intentional self-harm visits. Despite the rise in emergency department visits for suicide attempts and intentional self-harm, less than 16% included an evaluation by a mental health professional.

CONCLUSIONS

A significant national increase in emergency department visits for suicide attempts and intentional self-harm occurred from 2011 to 2020, as a proportion of total emergency department visits and as visits per capita. These trends underscore an urgent need to improve the continuum of mental health care for individuals with suicidal symptoms.

Pharmacists in Trauma: a randomised controlled trial of emergency medicine pharmacists in trauma response teams

BACKGROUND

Analgesia is an important component for patient well-being, but commonly delayed during trauma resuscitation. The Pharmacists in Trauma trial assessed the effects of integrating pharmacists into trauma response teams to improve analgesia delivery and medication management.

METHODS

This unblinded randomised trial compared emergency medicine (EM) pharmacist involvement in trauma callouts versus standard care at an Australian level 1 trauma centre. Randomisation was performed via an online single sequence randomisation service. Eligible patients included those managed with a trauma callout during working hours of an EM pharmacist. Pharmacists were able to prescribe medications using a Partnered Pharmacist Medication Charting model. The primary outcome was the proportion of patients who had first dose analgesia within 30 min compared using the χ2 test.

RESULTS

From 15 July 2021 until 31 January 2022, there were 119 patients randomised with 37 patients excluded as no analgesia was required. There were 82 patients included for analysis, 39 in the control arm and 43 in the intervention arm. The primary outcome was achieved in 25 (64.1%) patients in the control arm and 36 (83.7%) patients in the pharmacist arm (relative risk 1.31; 95% CI 1.0 to 1.71; p=0.042). Time to analgesia in the control arm was 28 (22-35) mins and 20 (15-26 mins) with pharmacist involvement; p=0.025. In the pharmacist arm, the initial dose of analgesia was prescribed by the pharmacist for 38 (88.4%) patients. There were 27 other medications prescribed by the pharmacist for the management of these patients. There were no differences in emergency and trauma centre or hospital length of stay.

CONCLUSION

Addition of the EM pharmacist in trauma response teams improved time to analgesia. Involvement of an EM pharmacist in trauma reception and resuscitation may assist by optimising medication management, with members of the team more available to focus on other life-saving interventions.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

ACTRN12621000338864.

Awareness with paralysis and symptoms of post-traumatic stress disorder among mechanically ventilated emergency department survivors (ED-AWARENESS-2 Trial): study protocol for a pragmatic, multicenter, stepped wedge cluster randomized trial

BACKGROUND

Awareness with paralysis (AWP) is memory recall during neuromuscular blockade (NMB) and can cause significant psychological harm. Decades of effort and rigorous trials have been conducted to prevent AWP in the operating room, where prevalence is 0.1-0.2%. By contrast, AWP in mechanically ventilated emergency department (ED) patients is common, with estimated prevalence of 3.3-7.4% among survivors given NMB. Longer-acting NMB use is a critical risk for AWP, and we have shown an association between ED rocuronium use and increased AWP prevalence. As NMB are given to more than 90% of ED patients during tracheal intubation, this trial provides a platform to test an intervention aimed at reducing AWP. The overall objective is to test the hypothesis that limiting ED rocuronium exposure will significantly reduce the proportion of patients experiencing AWP.

METHODS

This is a pragmatic, stepped wedge cluster randomized trial conducted in five academic EDs, and will enroll 3090 patients. Per the design, all sites begin in a control phase, under observational conditions. At 6-month intervals, sites sequentially enter a 2-month transition phase, during which we will implement the multifaceted intervention, which will rely on use of nudges and defaults to change clinician decisions regarding ED NMB use. During the intervention phase, succinylcholine will be the default NMB over rocuronium. The primary outcome is AWP, assessed with the modified Brice questionnaire, adjudicated by three independent, blinded experts. The secondary outcome is the proportion of patients developing clinically significant symptoms of post-traumatic stress disorder at 30 and 180 days after hospital discharge. We will also assess for symptoms of depression and anxiety, and health-related quality of life. A generalized linear model, adjusted for time and cluster interactions, will be used to compare AWP in control versus intervention phases, analyzed by intention-to-treat.

DISCUSSION

The ED-AWARENESS-2 Trial will be the first ED-based trial aimed at preventing AWP, a critical threat to patient safety. Results could shape clinical use of NMB in the ED and prevent more than 10,000 annual cases of AWP related to ED care.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT05534243 . Registered 06, September 2022.

Postintubation Sedation Practices Within Multiple Emergency Departments Across a Large Pediatric Health Care Organization

OBJECTIVE

Children requiring rapid or standard sequence intubation are at risk of experiencing paralysis without adequate sedation when the duration of neuromuscular blockade exceeds the duration of sedation provided by the induction agent. The objective of this study was to evaluate the rate of appropriately timed postintubation sedation (PIS; defined as the administration of PIS before the clinical effects of the induction agent have dissipated) in patients requiring intubation across multiple emergency department/urgent care sites within a large pediatric health care organization.

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study included patients admitted to 1 of 6 affiliated pediatric emergency department or urgent care sites who were intubated with an induction agent and neuromuscular blocker between January 2016 and December 2021. Patients were excluded if they were intubated in the setting of status epilepticus or cardiac arrest. Stepwise logistic regression identified factors associated with appropriately timed PIS.

RESULTS

A total of 283 patients met the inclusion criteria (mean age, 8 ± 7.6 years; 56% male). Two hundred thirty-eight patients (83%) received some form of PIS (105 [37%] received appropriately timed PIS and 133 [47%] received delayed PIS), and 45 patients (16%) received no PIS. The median time to receive PIS following administration of the induction agent was 21 minutes (interquartile range, 11-40 minutes). Patients induced with fentanyl were the least likely to receive PIS, whereas patients induced with etomidate were the most likely. However, because of the short duration of etomidate, most patients induced with etomidate failed to receive PIS in a timely manner.

CONCLUSIONS

Delayed PIS is common and may result in periods of ongoing paralysis without adequate sedation. Emergency department providers and pharmacists must recognize the brevity of some induction agents and provide more timely PIS.

Awareness With Paralysis Among Critically Ill Emergency Department Patients: A Prospective Cohort Study

OBJECTIVES

In mechanically ventilated patients, awareness with paralysis (AWP) can have devastating consequences, including post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), depression, and thoughts of suicide. Single-center data from the emergency department (ED) demonstrate an event rate for AWP factors higher than that reported from the operating room. However, there remains a lack of data on AWP among critically ill, mechanically ventilated patients. The objective was to assess the proportion of ED patients experiencing AWP and investigate modifiable variables associated with its occurrence.

DESIGN

An a priori planned secondary analysis of a multicenter, prospective, before-and-after clinical trial.

SETTING

The ED of three academic medical centers.

PATIENTS

Mechanically ventilated adult patients that received neuromuscular blockers.

INTERVENTIONS

None.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

All data related to sedation and analgesia were collected. AWP was the primary outcome, assessed with the modified Brice questionnaire, and was independently adjudicated by three expert reviewers. Perceived threat, in the causal pathway for PTSD, was the secondary outcome. A total of 388 patients were studied. The proportion of patients experiencing AWP was 3.4% ( n = 13), the majority of whom received rocuronium ( n = 12/13; 92.3%). Among patients who received rocuronium, 5.5% ( n = 12/230) experienced AWP, compared with 0.6% ( n = 1/158) among patients who did not receive rocuronium in the ED (odds ratio, 8.64; 95% CI, 1.11-67.15). Patients experiencing AWP had a higher mean ( sd ) threat perception scale score, compared with patients without AWP (15.6 [5.8] vs 7.7 [6.0]; p < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

AWP was present in a concerning proportion of mechanically ventilated ED patients, was associated with rocuronium exposure in the ED, and led to increased levels of perceived threat, placing patients at greater risk for PTSD. Studies that aim to further quantify AWP in this vulnerable population and eliminate its occurrence are urgently needed.

Initiative to Improve Postintubation Sedation in a Pediatric Emergency Department

BACKGROUND

Previous research has shown that appropriate pediatric postintubation sedation (PIS) after rapid sequence intubation only occurs 28% of the time. Factors such as high provider variability, cognitive overload, and errors of omission can delay time to PIS in a paralyzed patient.

PURPOSE

To increase the proportion of children receiving timely PIS by 20% within 6 months.

METHODS

A multidisciplinary team identified key drivers and targeted interventions to improve timeliness of PIS. The primary outcome of "sedation in an adequate time frame" was defined as a time to post-Rapid Sequence Intubation sedative administration less than the duration of action of the RSI sedative agent. Secondary outcomes included the proportion of patients receiving any sedation and time to PIS administration.

RESULTS

Pediatric postintubation sedation in an adequate time was improved from 27.9% of intubated patients to 55.6% after intervention (p = .001). The number of patients receiving any PIS improved from 74% to 94% (p = .006). The median time from RSI to PIS was reduced from 13 to 9 minutes (p < .001). Process control charts showed a reduction in PIS variability and a centerline reduction from 19 to 10 minutes.

CONCLUSIONS

Implementation of an intubation checklist and a multidisciplinary approach improved the rate of adequate pediatric PIS.

The Administration of Postintubation Sedation in the Pediatric Emergency Department

BACKGROUND

The administration of postintubation sedation (PIS) is an essential component of postintubation care. Recent studies in the adult emergency medicine literature have highlighted both delays in time to administration of PIS and subtherapeutic dosing of sedative agents in the emergency department. We aimed to investigate the administration of PIS in the pediatric population as this has not been adequately reviewed to date.

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to determine the percentage of pediatric emergency department patients who received PIS within an adequate time frame. We also investigated the relationship between this primary outcome and the rapid sequence intubation (RSI) agents used, the reason for intubation, and individual patient characteristics.

METHODS

This was a retrospective cohort analysis of all pediatric patients who underwent RSI at a tertiary care pediatric emergency department from July 2007 to January 2016. The primary outcome of "sedation in an adequate time frame" was defined as a time to post-RSI sedative administration that was shorter than the duration of action of the RSI sedative agent used. Logistic regression was performed to identify predictors of adequate sedation.

RESULTS

A total of 240 patients were included in the analysis. Of these, 28% (95% confidence interval, 22.7%-34.1%) met the primary outcome of sedation within an adequate time frame; 72.8% (95% confidence interval, 66.8%-78.1%) of patients received some form of PIS during their emergency department stay. Patients receiving long-acting paralytic agents were much less likely to receive PIS with an odds ratio (OR) of 0.16 for meeting the primary outcome (P < 0.001, adjusted OR [AOR] = 0.13, P < 0.001). Children with higher systolic blood pressure were more likely to receive appropriate PIS with an OR of 1.02 for every mm Hg increase in systolic blood pressure (P = 0.006, AOR = 1.02, P = 0.021). Finally, patients who were ultimately admitted to the pediatric intensive care unit (vs the operating room, transfer, or neonatal intensive care unit) were less likely to receive PIS as evidenced by an OR of 0.37 (P = 0.009, AOR = 0.27, P = 0.004).

CONCLUSIONS

Most pediatric patients do not receive PIS within an adequate time frame. Patients who receive long-acting paralytic agents are much less likely to be adequately sedated after RSI compared with those receiving succinylcholine.

Just the Facts: Postintubation sedation in the emergency department

A 67-year-old male presents to the emergency department (ED) in respiratory distress secondary to pneumonia. His oxygen saturation is 86% on a nonrebreather, respiratory rate is 32 respirations/minute, blood pressure 147/72 mmHg, heart rate 121 beats/minute, and temperature is 38.7° Celsius. The decision is made to intubate the patient. Fentanyl and propofol are used for analgesia and sedation, and rocuronium is used for paralysis. Using video laryngoscopy, the patient is successfully intubated, and now the ED team is awaiting your orders for the postintubation sedation care of this patient.

The ED-AWARENESS Study: A Prospective, Observational Cohort Study of Awareness With Paralysis in Mechanically Ventilated Patients Admitted From the Emergency Department

STUDY OBJECTIVE

Awareness with paralysis is a devastating complication for patients receiving mechanical ventilation and risks long-term psychological morbidity. Data from the emergency department (ED) demonstrate a high rate of longer-acting neuromuscular blocking agent use, delayed analgosedation, and a lack of sedation depth monitoring. These practices are discordant with recommendations for preventing awareness with paralysis. Despite this, awareness with paralysis has not been rigorously studied in the ED population. Our objective is to assess the prevalence of awareness with paralysis in ED patients receiving mechanical ventilation.

METHODS

This was a single-center, prospective, observational cohort study on 383 mechanically ventilated ED patients. After extubation, we assessed patients for awareness with paralysis by using the modified Brice questionnaire. Three expert reviewers independently adjudicated awareness with paralysis. We report the prevalence of awareness with paralysis (primary outcome); the secondary outcome was perceived threat, a mediator for development of posttraumatic stress disorder.

RESULTS

The prevalence of awareness with paralysis was 2.6% (10/383). Exposure to rocuronium at any point in the ED was significantly different between patients who experienced awareness with paralysis (70%) versus the rest of the cohort (31.4%) (unadjusted odds ratio 5.1; 95% confidence interval 1.30 to 20.1). Patients experiencing awareness with paralysis had higher mean values on the threat perception scale, denoting a higher degree of perceived threat, compared with patients who did not experience awareness with paralysis (13.4 [SD 7.7] versus 8.5 [SD 6.2]; mean difference 4.9; 95% confidence interval 0.94 to 8.8).

CONCLUSION

Awareness with paralysis occurs in a significant minority of ED patients who receive mechanical ventilation. Potential associations of awareness with paralysis with ED care and increased perceived threat warrant further evaluation.

To Block or Not: Updates in Neuromuscular Blockade in Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome

Objective: To review and evaluate neuromuscular blocking agents (NMBAs) in critically ill patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). Data Sources: A literature search utilizing PubMed was performed (January 1991 to January 2020) using the following search terms: ( neuromuscular blocking agents OR neuromuscular blockade OR cisatracurium OR rocuronium OR vecuronium OR pancuronium OR atracurium) AND * acute respiratory distress syndrome OR acute lung injury). Publications in English were evaluated. Study Selection and Data Extraction: Relevant clinical studies in humans were considered. Data Synthesis: Although NMBAs have been used for decades in the setting of ARDS, questions regarding mortality benefit remain. Early NMBA, within 48 hours of lung injury, have been historically used in critically ill patients with ARDS to aid in increasing alveolar recruitment, improving patient-ventilator synchrony, and promoting oxygenation by the prevention of contraction of respiratory muscles. Until recently, the literature showed an improvement in 90-day adjusted mortality. However, recent literature has demonstrated the lack of a mortality benefit. The continued receipt of NMBAs, with no clear benefit, could potentially lead to increased costs, skin breakdown, corneal abrasions, venous thromboembolisms, intensive care unit acquired weakness, and awareness with inappropriate sedation. Relevance to Patient Care and Clinical Practice: This review aims at discussing the preferred NMBA based on mechanism of action and reviews specific clinical trial data for the use of NMBAs in ARDS, clinical implications of these trial data, complications for the use of NMBAs, and needed future directions. Conclusions: The mortality benefit of NMBAs in ARDS has contradicting evidence with potentially serious adverse effects and notable controversies.

Protocol for a prospective, observational cohort study of awareness in mechanically ventilated patients admitted from the emergency department: the ED-AWARENESS study

INTRODUCTION

Awareness with paralysis is a complication with potentially devastating psychological consequences for mechanically ventilated patients. While rigorous investigation into awareness has occurred for operating room patients, little attention has been paid outside of this domain. Mechanically ventilated patients in the emergency department (ED) have been historically managed in a way that predisposes them to awareness events: high incidence of neuromuscular blockade use, underdosing of analgesia and sedation, delayed administration of analgesia and sedation after intubation, and a lack of monitoring of sedation targets and depth. These practice patterns are discordant to recommendations for reducing the incidence of awareness, suggesting there is significant rationale to examine awareness in the ED population.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

This is a single centre, prospective cohort study examining the incidence of awareness in mechanically ventilated ED patients. A cohort of 383 mechanically ventilated ED patients will be included. The primary outcome is awareness with paralysis. Qualitative reports of all awareness events will be provided. Recognising the potential problem with conventional multivariable analysis arising from a small number of events (expected less than 10-phenomenon of separation), Firth penalised method, exact logistic regression model or penalised maximum likelihood estimation shrinkage (Ridge, LASSO) will be used to assess for predictors of awareness.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

Approval of the study by the Human Research Protection Office has been obtained. This work will be disseminated by publication of peer-reviewed manuscripts, presentation in abstract form at scientific meetings and data sharing with other investigators through academically established means.

Roles of the emergency medicine pharmacist: A systematic review

PURPOSE

Results of a systematic literature review to identify roles for emergency medicine (EM) pharmacists beyond traditionally reported activities and to quantify the benefits of these roles in terms of patient outcomes are reported.

SUMMARY

Emergency department (ED)-based clinical pharmacy is a rapidly growing practice area that has gained support in a number of countries globally, particularly over the last 5-10 years. A systematic literature search covering the period 1995-2016 was conducted to characterize emerging EM pharmacist roles and the impact on patient outcomes. Six databases were searched for research publications on pharmacist participation in patient care in a general ED or trauma center that documented interventions by ED-based pharmacists; 15 results satisfied the inclusion criteria. Six reported studies evaluated EM pharmacist involvement in the care of critically ill patients, 5 studies evaluated antimicrobial stewardship (AMS) activities via pharmacist review of positive cultures, 2 studies assessed pharmacist involvement in generating orders for nurse-administered home medications and 2 reviewed publications focused on EM pharmacist involvement in management of healthcare-associated pneumonia and dosing of phenytoin. A diverse range of positive patient outcomes was identified. The included studies were assessed to be of low quality.

CONCLUSION

A systematic review of the literature revealed 3 key emerging areas of practice for the EM pharmacist that are associated with positive patient outcomes. These included involvement in management of critically ill patients, AMS roles, and ordering of home medications in the ED.

Factors associated with post-intubation sedation after emergency department intubation: A Report from The National Emergency Airway Registry

BACKGROUND

Previous work has suggested low rates of post-intubation sedation in patients undergoing endotracheal intubation (ETI) in the emergency department (ED) with limited data examining factors associated with sedation use. Utilizing a national database; we sought to determine the frequency of post-intubation sedation and associated factors.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective analysis of a prospectively collected database (National Emergency Airway Registry (NEAR) from 25 EDs from January 1, 2016 to December 31, 2017). Patients were considered to have received post-intubation sedation if they received any of the following medications within 15 min of ETI completion; propofol, midazolam, diazepam, ketamine, etomidate, fentanyl, and morphine. We calculated odds ratios for post-intubation sedation.

RESULTS

Of the 11,748 eligible intubations, 9099 received post-intubation sedation (77.5%) while 2649 did not (22.5%). Pre-intubation hypotension (odds ratio; 95% confidence Interval) (0.27; 0.24-0.31) and post-intubation hypotension (0.27; 0.24-0.31) were associated with lower odds of post-intubation sedation. Patients with a medical indication compared to a traumatic indication for ETI had higher odds of receiving post-intubation sedation (1.16; 1.05-1.28) as did those that underwent rapid sequence intubation (15.15; 13.56-16.93). Use of succinylcholine was associated with a higher odd of post-intubation sedation compared to a long-acting neuromuscular blocking agent (i.e. rocuronium or vecuronium) (1.89; 1.68-2.12).

CONCLUSION

Post-intubation sedation rates in NEAR are higher than previously reported and multiple factors including the indication for intubation and succinylcholine use, are associated with higher odds of receiving post-intubation sedation.

Alternatives to Rapid Sequence Intubation: Contemporary Airway Management with Ketamine

Endotracheal intubation (ETI) is a high-risk procedure commonly performed in emergency medicine, critical care, and the prehospital setting. Traditional rapid sequence intubation (RSI), the simultaneous administration of an induction agent and muscle relaxant, is more likely to harm patients who do not allow appropriate preparation and preoxygenation, have concerning airway anatomy, or severe hypoxia, acidemia, or hypotension. Ketamine, a dissociative anesthetic, can be used to facilitate two alternatives to RSI to augment airway safety in these scenarios: delayed sequence intubation - the use of ketamine to allow airway preparation and preoxygenation in the agitated patient; and ketamine-only breathing intubation, in which ketamine is used without a paralytic to facilitate ETI as the patient continues to breathe spontaneously. Ketamine may also provide hemodynamic benefits during standard RSI and is a valuable agent for post-intubation analgesia and sedation. When RSI is not an optimal airway management strategy, ketamine's unique pharmacology can be harnessed to facilitate alternative approaches that may increase patient safety.

Simple Changes to Emergency Department Workflow Improve Analgesia in Mechanically Ventilated Patients

Introduction

In 2013 the Society for Critical Care Medicine (SCCM) published guidelines for the management of pain and agitation in the intensive care unit (ICU). These guidelines recommend using an analgesia-first strategy in mechanically ventilated patients as well as reducing the use of benzodiazepines. Benzodiazepines increase delirium in ICU patients thereby increasing ICU length of stay. We sought to determine whether a simple educational intervention for emergency department (ED) staff, as well as two simple changes in workflow, would improve adherence to the SCCM guidelines.

Methods

This was a cohort study that took place from 2014–2016. All patients who were intubated in the ED by an emergency physician (EP) during this time were eligible for inclusion in this study. In January 2015, we began an educational campaign with the ED staff consisting of a series of presentations and online trainings. The impetus for our educational campaign was to have best practices in place for our new emergency medicine residency program starting in July 2016. We made two minor changes in our ED workflow to support this educational objective. First, fentanyl infusions were stocked in the ED. Second, we instituted a medication order set for mechanically ventilated patients. This order set nudged EPs to choose medications consistent with the SCCM guidelines. We then evaluated the use of opioids and benzodiazepines in mechanically ventilated patients from 2014 through 2016 using Fisher’s exact test. All analyses were conducted in the overall sample (n=509) as well as in subgroups after excluding patients with seizures/status epilepticus as their primary admission diagnosis (n=461).

Results

In 2014 prior to the interventions, 41% of mechanically ventilated patients received an opioid, either as an intravenous (IV) push or IV infusion. In 2015 immediately after the intervention, 71% of patients received an opioid and 64% received an opioid in 2016. The use of benzodiazepine infusions decreased from 22% in 2014 to 7% in 2015 to 1% in 2016.

Conclusion

A brief educational intervention along with two simple changes in ED workflow can improve compliance with the SCCM guidelines for the management of pain and agitation in mechanically ventilated patients.

A Randomized Comparison of In-hospital Rescuer Positions for Endotracheal Intubation in a Difficult Airway

Introduction

Emergency endotracheal intubation (ETI) is a common and critical procedure performed in both prehospital and in-hospital settings. Studies of prehospital providers have demonstrated that rescuer position influences ETI outcomes. However, studies of in-hospital rescuer position for ETI are limited. While we adhere to strict standards for the administration of ETI, we posited that perhaps requiring in-hospital rescuers to stand for ETI is an obstacle to effectiveness. Our objective was to compare in-hospital emergency medicine (EM) trainees’ performance on ETI delivered from both the seated and standing positions.

Methods

EM residents performed ETI on a difficult airway mannequin from both a seated and standing position. They were randomized to the position from which they performed ETI first. All ETIs were recorded and then scored using a modified version of the Airway Management Proficiency Checklist. Residents also rated the laryngeal view and the difficulty of the procedure. We analyzed comparisons between ETI positions with paired t-tests.

Results

Forty-two of our 49 residents (85.7%) participated. Fifteen (35.7%) were female, and all three levels of training were represented. The average number of prior ETI experiences among our subjects was 44 (standard deviation=34). All scores related to ETI performance were statistically equivalent across the two positions (performance score, number of attempts, time to intubation success, and ratings of difficulty and laryngeal view). We also observed no differences across levels of training.

Conclusion

The position of the in-hospital provider, whether seated or standing, had no effect on the provider’s ETI performance. Since environmental circumstances sometimes necessitate alternative positioning for effective ETI administration, our findings suggest that there may be value in training residents to perform ETI from both positions.

Analgosedation Practices and the Impact of Sedation Depth on Clinical Outcomes Among Patients Requiring Mechanical Ventilation in the ED: A Cohort Study

BACKGROUND

Analgesia and sedation are cornerstone therapies for mechanically ventilated patients. Despite data showing that early deep sedation in the ICU influences outcome, this has not been investigated in the ED. Therefore, ED-based sedation practices, and their influence on outcome, remain incompletely defined. This study's objectives were to describe ED sedation practices in mechanically ventilated patients and to test the hypothesis that ED sedation depth is associated with worse outcomes.

METHODS

This was a cohort study of a prospectively compiled ED registry of adult mechanically ventilated patients at a single academic medical center. Hospital mortality was the primary outcome and hospital-, ICU-, and ventilator-free days were secondary outcomes. A backward stepwise multivariable logistic regression model evaluated the primary outcome as a function of ED sedation depth. Sedation depth was assessed with the Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale (RASS).

RESULTS

Four hundred fourteen patients were studied. In the ED, 354 patients (85.5%) received fentanyl, 254 (61.3%) received midazolam, and 194 (46.9%) received propofol. Deep sedation was observed in 244 patients (64.0%). After adjusting for confounders, a deeper ED RASS was associated with mortality (adjusted OR, 0.77; 95% CI, 0.63-0.94).

CONCLUSIONS

Early deep sedation is common in mechanically ventilated ED patients and is associated with worse mortality. These data suggest that ED-based sedation is a modifiable variable that could be targeted to improve outcome.

Impact of Clinical Pharmacists on Initiation of Postintubation Analgesia in the Emergency Department

BACKGROUND

Pain and anxiety are common in mechanically ventilated patients, and frequently undertreated in the emergency department (ED) setting.

OBJECTIVE

We sought to compare the rate of initiation of postintubation analgesia in the ED before and after intervention by pharmacists specialized in emergency medicine.

METHODS

This was a retrospective cohort study of patients who underwent rapid sequence intubation (RSI) in the ED. The primary endpoint was overall frequency of analgesia initiation, with subset analysis of RSI during the ED pharmacist (EDP) duty hours. Secondary endpoints included frequency of sedative or anxiolytic use without analgesia, time to initiation of postintubation analgesia, and adverse drug events (ADEs) resulting in analgesia discontinuation.

RESULTS

Forty-one patients were included in each group. The overall rate of postintubation analgesia increased after pharmacist intervention, from 20% to 49% (p = 0.005). Analgesia initiation during EDP hours was 50% and 85% in the pre- and postintervention groups, respectively. In the preintervention group, more patients received sedation without analgesia (73% vs. 51%; p = 0.04), and a small percentage (7%) received neither sedation nor analgesia. Time to initiation of postintubation analgesia decreased from 98 min to 45 min. ADEs were rare: there were no discontinuations of analgesic therapy in the preintervention group and one temporary discontinuation because of hypotension in the postintervention group.

CONCLUSION

Analgesic use after RSI in the ED significantly increased after the implementation of ED pharmacy services. The large proportion of patients receiving analgesia during the EDP duty hours suggest the increase may be related to direct pharmacist involvement in postintubation management.

Effect of a pharmacist on timing of postintubation sedative and analgesic use in trauma resuscitations

PURPOSE

Pharmacists' impact in reducing the time interval from intubation to sedative and analgesic use during trauma patient resuscitations is investigated.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study was conducted at a level 1 trauma center to compare medication-use outcomes in consecutive cases in which trauma patients underwent rocuronium-assisted rapid-sequence intubation (RSI) and subsequent sedation and analgesia with or without a pharmacist's participation on the resuscitation team. The primary and secondary outcomes were, respectively, the time to sedative provision and the time to analgesic provision after intubation.

RESULTS

Relative to resuscitation cases not involving a pharmacist, the presence of the pharmacist during RSI was associated with decreased mean times to provision of postintubation sedation (9 minutes versus 28 minutes, p = 0.007) and analgesia (21 minutes versus 44 minutes, p = 0.057). The cumulative proportions of patients receiving appropriate sedation 5, 10, and 15 minutes after intubation were 11%, 26%, and 41% in the pharmacist-absent group and 33%, 53%, and 63% in the pharmacist-present group (p = 0.009, 0.008, and 0.045, respectively); for postintubation analgesic use, the corresponding figures were 9%, 14%, and 23% in the pharmacist-absent group and 17%, 30%, and 43% in the pharmacist-present group (p = 0.236, 0.066, and 0.039, respectively).

CONCLUSION

The presence of a pharmacist during RSI procedures was associated with decreased times to postintubation sedative and analgesic use, indicating that pharmacist participation in trauma-resuscitation responses can facilitate appropriate drug therapy.

Impact of checklists on peri-intubation care in ED trauma patients

BACKGROUND

Checklists have successfully been used in intensive care units (ICUs) to improve metrics of critical care. Proper peri-intubation care including use of appropriate induction agents and postintubation sedation is crucial when performing endotracheal intubation (ETI) on critically ill patients, especially in the emergency department (ED). We sought to evaluate the impact of checklists on peri-intubation care in ED trauma patients.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective review of all trauma patients intubated in the ED of an urban, level 1 academic center from November 2010 to October 2012. As part of a quality improvement project, a peri-intubation checklist was instituted on November 1, 2011 to guide peri-intubation care. Using a predesign and postdesign, we compared peri-intubation parameters using parametric and nonparametric statistics when appropriate to evaluate the impact of a checklist on peri-intubation care. We also evaluated outcome measures including mortality and lengths of stay.

RESULTS

During the 2-year study period, 187 trauma patients underwent ETI in the ED, 90 prechecklist and 97 postchecklist. Rapid sequence intubation (RSI) use was greater with the checklist than without (90.7% vs 75.6%, P=.005). No difference was found between the number of ETI attempts per patient, hemodynamic parameters (heart rate, blood pressure, and oxygen saturation), postintubation anxiolysis, median number of ventilator days, length of ED stay, length of ICU stay, or mortality.

CONCLUSION

Peri-intubation checklists result in higher rates of RSI in ED trauma patients but do not alter other measured metrics of peri-intubation care.