Opportunity to reduce transfer of patients with mild traumatic brain injury and intracranial hemorrhage to a Level 1 trauma center

The Florida Geriatric Head Trauma CT Clinical Decision Rule

BACKGROUND

Several clinical decision rules have been devised to guide head computed tomography (CT) use in patients with minor head injuries, but none have been validated in patients 65 years or older. We aimed to derive and validate a head injury clinical decision rule for older adults.

METHODS

We conducted a secondary analysis of an existing dataset of consecutive emergency department (ED) patients >65 years old with blunt head trauma. The main predictive outcomes were significant intracranial injury and Need for Neurosurgical Intervention on CT. The secondary outcomes also considered in the model development and validation were All Injuries and All Intracranial Injuries. Predictor variables were identified using multiple variable logistic regression, and clinical decision rule models were developed in a split-sample derivation cohort and then tested in an independent validation cohort.

RESULTS

Of 5776 patients, 233 (4.0%) had significant intracranial injury and an additional 104 (1.8%) met CT criteria for Need for Neurosurgical Intervention. The best performing model, the Florida Geriatric Head Trauma CT Clinical Decision Rule, assigns points based on several clinical variables. If the points totaled 25 or more, a CT scan is indicated. The included predictors were arrival via Emergency Medical Services (+30 points), Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) <15 (+20 points), GCS <14 (+50 points), antiplatelet medications (+17 points), loss of consciousness (+16 points), signs of basilar skull fracture (+50 points), and headache (+20 points). Utilizing this clinical decision rule in the validation cohort, a point total ≥25 had a sensitivity and specificity of 100.0% (95% CI: 96.0-100) and 12.3% (95% CI: 10.9-13.8), respectively, for significant intracranial injury and Need for Neurosurgical Intervention.

CONCLUSIONS

The Florida Geriatric Head Trauma CT Clinical Decision Rule has the potential to reduce unnecessary CT scans in older adults, without compromising safe emergency medicine practice.

Reducing low-value interhospital transfers for mild traumatic brain injury

BACKGROUND

The modified Brain Injury Guidelines (mBIG) were developed to stratify traumatic brain injuries (TBIs) and improve health care utilization by selectively requiring repeat imaging, intensive care unit admission, and neurosurgical (NSG) consultation. The goal of this study is to assess safety and potential resource savings associated with the application of mBIG on interhospital patient transfers for TBI.

METHODS

Adult patients with TBI transferred to our Level I trauma center from January 2017 to December 2022 meeting mBIG inclusion criteria were retrospectively stratified into mBIG1, mBIG2, and mBIG3 based on initial clinicoradiological factors. At the time, our institution routinely admitted patients with TBI and intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) to the intensive care unit and obtained a repeat head computed tomography with NSG consultation, independent of TBI severity or changes in neurological examination. The primary outcome was progression of ICH on repeat imaging and/or NSG intervention. Secondary outcomes included length of stay and financial charges. Subgroup analysis on isolated TBI without significant extracranial injury was performed.

RESULTS

Over the 6-year study period, 289 patients were classified into mBIG1 (61; 21.1%), mBIG2 (69; 23.9%), and mBIG3 (159; 55.0%). Of mBIG1 patients, 2 (2.9%) had radiological progression to mBIG2 without clinical decline, and none required NSG intervention. Of mBIG2, 2 patients (3.3%) progressed to mBIG3, and both required NSG intervention. More than 35% of transferred patients had minor isolated TBI. For mBIG1 and mBIG2, the median hospitalization charges per patient were $152,296 and $149,550, respectively, and the median length of stay was 4 and 5 days, respectively, with the majority downgraded from the intensive care unit within 48 hours.

CONCLUSION

Clinically significant progression of ICH occurred infrequently in 1.5% of patients with mBIG1 and mBIG2 injuries. More than 35% of interfacility transfers for minor isolated TBI meeting mBIG1 and 2 criteria are low value and may potentially be safely deferred in an urban health care setting.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic/Care Management; Level IV.

Diagnostic Utility of Glial Fibrillary Acidic Protein Beyond 12 Hours After Traumatic Brain Injury: A TRACK-TBI Study

Blood levels of glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) and ubiquitin carboxyl-terminal hydrolase-L1 (UCH-L1) within 12h of suspected traumatic brain injury (TBI) have been approved by the Food and Drug administration to aid in determining the need for a brain computed tomography (CT) scan. The current study aimed to determine whether this context of use can be expanded beyond 12h post-TBI in patients presenting with Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) 13-15. The prospective, 18-center Transforming Research and Clinical Knowledge in Traumatic Brain Injury (TRACK-TBI) study enrolled TBI participants aged ≥17 years who presented to a United States Level 1 trauma center and received a clinically indicated brain CT scan within 24h post-injury, a blood draw within 24h and at 14 days for biomarker analysis. Data from participants with emergency department arrival GCS 13-15 and biomarker values at days 1 and 14 were extracted for the primary analysis. A subgroup of hospitalized participants with serial biomarkers at days 1, 3, 5, and 14 were analyzed, including plasma GFAP and UCH-L1, and serum neuron-specific enolase (NSE) and S100 calcium-binding protein B (S100B). The primary analysis compared biomarker values dichotomized by head CT results (CT+/CT-). Area under receiver-operating characteristic curve (AUC) was used to determine diagnostic accuracy. The overall cohort included 1142 participants with initial GCS 13-15, with mean age 39.8 years, 65% male, and 73% Caucasian. The GFAP provided good discrimination in the overall cohort at days 1 (AUC = 0.82) and 14 (AUC = 0.72), and in the hospitalized subgroup at days 1 (AUC = 0.84), 3 (AUC = 0.88), 5 (AUC = 0.82), and 14 (AUC = 0.74). The UCH-L1, NSE, and S100B did not perform well (AUC = 0.51-0.57 across time points). This study demonstrates the utility of GFAP to aid in decision-making for diagnostic brain CT imaging beyond the 12h time frame in patients with TBI who have a GCS 13-15.

Modified Brain Injury Guidelines for preinjury anticoagulation in traumatic brain injury: An opportunity to reduce health care resource utilization

INTRODUCTION

The Brain Injury Guidelines (BIG) stratify patients by traumatic brain injury (TBI) severity to provide management recommendations to reduce health care resource burden but mandates that patients on anticoagulation (AC) are allocated to the most severe tertile (BIG 3). We sought to analyze TBI patients on AC therapy using a modified BIG model to determine if this population can offer further opportunity for safe reductions in health care resource utilization.

METHODS

Patients 55 years or older on AC with traumatic intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) from two centers were retrospectively stratified into BIG 1 to 3 risk groups using modified BIG criteria excluding AC as a criterion. Intracranial hemorrhage progression, neurosurgical intervention (NSI), death, and worsened discharge status were compared.

RESULTS

A total of 221 patients were included, with 23%, 29%, and 48% classified as BIG 1, BIG 2, and BIG 3, respectively. The BIG 3 cohort had a higher rate of AC reversal agents administered (66%) compared with the BIG 1 (40%) and BIG 2 (54%) cohorts ( p < 0.01), as well as ICH progression discovered on repeat head computed tomography (56% vs. 38% vs. 26%, respectively; p < 0.001). No patients in the BIG 1 and 2 cohorts required NSI. No patients in BIG 1 and 3% of patients in BIG 2 died secondary to the ICH. In the BIG 3 cohort, 16% of patients required NSI and 26% died. Brain Injury Guidelines 3 patients had 15 times the odds of mortality compared with BIG 1 patients ( p < 0.01).

CONCLUSION

The AC population had higher rates of ICH progression than the BIG literature, but this did not lead to more NSI or mortality in the lower tertiles of our modified BIG protocol. If the modified BIG used the original tertile management on our population, then NS consultation may have been reduced by up to 52%. These modified criteria may be a safe opportunity for further health care resource and cost savings in the TBI population.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Prognostic and Epidemiological; Level IV.

Risk Factors Associated With Neurosurgical Intervention in Patients With Mild Traumatic Intracranial Hemorrhage

INTRODUCTION

Community centers commonly transfer patients with traumatic intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) to level 1 and 2 trauma centers for neurosurgical evaluation regardless of the degree of injury. Determining risk factors leading to neurosurgical intervention (NSI) may reduce morbidity and mortality of traumatic ICH and the transfer of patients with lower risk of NSI.

METHODS

A retrospective chart review was performed on patients admitted or transferred to a level 1 trauma center from October 2015 to September 2019 with Glassgow Coma Scale score 13-15 and traumatic ICH on initial head computerized tomography (CTH) scan. Bivariate analyses and multivariable regression were used to identify factors associated with progression to NSI.

RESULTS

Of 1542 included patients, 8.2% required NSI. A greater proportion were male (69.1% versus 52.3%, P = 0.0003), on warfarin (37.7% versus 21.6%, P = 0.0023), presented with subdural hemorrhage (98.4% versus 63.3%, P < 0.0001, larger subdural hemorrhage size (median 19 mm [interquartile range {IQR}: 14-25] versus 5 mm [IQR: 3-8], P < 0.0001), and had a worsening repeat CTH (24.4% versus 13%, P < 0.0001). On physical examination, more patients had confusion (40.5% versus 31.4%, P = 0.0495) and hemiparesis (16.2% versus 2.6%, P < 0.0001). CTH findings of midline shift (80.2% versus 10.8%, P < 0.0001) and shift size (median 8.0 mm [IQR: 5.0-12.0] versus 4 mm [IQR: 3-5], P < 0.0001) were significantly associated with NSI.

CONCLUSIONS

Clinical factors and patient characteristics can be used to infer a greater risk of requiring NSI. These factors could reduce unnecessary transfers and hasten the transfer of patients more likely to progress to NSI.

The impact of low-dose aspirin in the Brain Injury Guidelines on outcomes in traumatic brain injury: A retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

Current Brain Injury Guidelines (BIG) characterize patients with intracranial hemorrhage taking antiplatelet or anticoagulant agents as BIG 3 (the most severe category) regardless of trauma severity. This study assessed the risk of in-hospital mortality or need for neurosurgery in patients taking low-dose aspirin who otherwise would be classified as BIG 1.

METHODS

This was a retrospective study at an academic level 1 trauma center. Patients were included if they were admitted with traumatic intracerebral hemorrhage and were evaluated by the BIG criteria. Exclusion criteria included indeterminate BIG status or patients with missing primary outcomes documentation. Patients were categorized as BIG 1, BIG 2, BIG 3, or BIG 1 on aspirin (patients with BIG 1 features taking low-dose aspirin). The primary endpoint was a composite of neurosurgical intervention and all-cause in-hospital mortality. Key secondary endpoints include rate of intracranial hemorrhage progression, and intensive care unit- and hospital-free days.

RESULTS

A total of 1,520 patients met the inclusion criteria. Median initial Glasgow Coma Scale was 14 (interquartile range [IQR], 12-15), Injury Severity Scale score was 17 (IQR, 10-25), and Abbreviated Injury Scale subscore head and neck (AIS Head ) was 3 (IQR, 3-4). The rate of the primary outcome for BIG 1, BIG 1 on aspirin, BIG 2, and BIG 3 was 1%, 2.2%, 1%, and 27%, respectively; the difference between BIG 1 on aspirin and BIG 3 was significant ( p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Patients taking low-dose aspirin with otherwise BIG 1-grade injuries experienced mortality and required neurosurgery significantly less often than other patients categorized as BIG 3. Inclusion of low-dose aspirin in the BIG criteria should be reevaluated.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic/Care Management; Level IV.

Moderate and severe traumatic brain injury in general hospitals: a ten-year population-based retrospective cohort study in central Norway

BACKGROUND

Patients with moderate and severe traumatic brain injury (TBI) are admitted to general hospitals (GHs) without neurosurgical services, but few studies have addressed the management of these patients. This study aimed to describe these patients, the rate of and reasons for managing patients entirely at the GH, and differences between patients managed entirely at the GH (GH group) and patients transferred to the regional trauma centre (RTC group). We specifically examined the characteristics of elderly patients.

METHODS

Patients with moderate (Glasgow Coma Scale score 9-13) and severe (score ≤ 8) TBIs who were admitted to one of the seven GHs without neurosurgical services in central Norway between 01.10.2004 and 01.10.2014 were retrospectively identified. Demographic, injury-related and outcome data were collected from medical records. Head CT scans were reviewed.

RESULTS

Among 274 patients admitted to GHs, 137 (50%) were in the GH group. The transferral rate was 58% for severe TBI and 40% for moderate TBI. Compared to the RTC group, patients in the GH group were older (median age: 78 years vs. 54 years, p < 0.001), more often had a preinjury disability (50% vs. 39%, p = 0.037), and more often had moderate TBI (52% vs. 35%, p = 0.005). The six-month case fatality rate was low (8%) in the GH group when transferral was considered unnecessary due to a low risk of further deterioration and high (90%, median age: 87 years) when neurosurgical intervention was considered nonbeneficial. Only 16% of patients ≥ 80 years old were transferred to the RTC. For this age group, the in-hospital case fatality rate was 67% in the GH group and 36% in the RTC group and 84% and 73%, respectively, at 6 months.

CONCLUSIONS

Half of the patients were managed entirely at a GH, and these were mainly patients considered to have a low risk of further deterioration, patients with moderate TBI, and elderly patients. Less than two of ten patients ≥ 80 years old were transferred, and survival was poor regardless of the transferral status.

What are the demographic and clinical differences between those older adults with traumatic brain injury who receive a neurosurgical intervention to those that do not? A systematic literature review with narrative synthesis

OBJECTIVES

This review aimed to identify the demographic and clinical differences between those older adults admitted directly under neurosurgical care and those that were not, and whether EMS clinicians could use these differences to improve patient triage.

METHODS

The authors searched for papers that included older adults who had suffered a TBI and were either admitted directly under neurosurgical care or were not. Titles and abstracts were screened, shortlisting potentially eligible papers before performing a full-text review. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale was used to assess the risk of bias.

RESULTS

A total of nine studies were eligible for inclusion. A high abbreviated injury score head, Marshall score or subdural hematoma greater than 10 mm were associated with neurosurgical care. There were few differences between those patients who did and did not receive neurosurgical intervention.

CONCLUSIONS

Absence of guidelines and clinician bias means that differences between those treated aggressively and conservatively observed in the literature are fraught with bias. Further work is required to understand which patients would benefit from an escalation of care and whether EMS can identify these patients so they are transported directly to a hospital with the appropriate services on-site.

Relationship Between CT Head Findings and Long-term Recovery in Children with Complicated Mild Traumatic Brain Injury

PRIMARY OBJECTIVE

Complicated mild traumatic brain injury (C-mTBI) refers to CT positive patients with clinically mild TBI. This study investigates the association between CT head findings at time of injury and recovery of paediatric patients with C-mTBI.

RESEARCH DESIGN

Retrospective survey and chart review.

METHODS

For paediatric patients with C-mTBI (N = 77), CT findings associated with corresponding degree and lengths of recovery from C-mTBI using logistic regression analysis.

RESULTS

There was a trend that the odds of incomplete recovery at the time of survey was higher for older children than for younger children (OR = 1.14, 95% CI = 0.98-1.32, p = 0.072). There was a trend that the odds of incomplete recovery (OR = 6.26, 95% CI = 0.97-40.57, p = 0.054) and longer duration for recovery (OR = 8.14, 95% CI = 0.78-84.46, p = 0.079) was higher for children with multiple haemorrhagic contusions than those with single haemorrhagic contusion. No other imaging patterns predicted degree or length of recovery with statistical significance (p > 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Other than the presence of multiple haemorrhagic contusions, no other pattern of imaging abnormality in paediatric C-mTBI appears to be associated with degree or length of recovery. Further studies with larger cohorts are encouraged.

Short Observation Period and Aggressive Discharge of Patients With Head Injury and Serial CT Scans

Background: Many patients undergo two head computed tomography (CT) scans after mild traumatic brain injury (TBI). Radiographic progression without clinical deterioration does not usually alter management. Evidence-based guidelines offer potential for limited repeat imaging and safe discharge. This study characterizes patients who had two head CTs in the Emergency Department (ED), determines the change between initial and repeat CTs, and describes timing of repeat scans.Methods: This retrospective series includes all patients with head CTs during the same ED visit at an urban trauma center between May 1st, 2016 and April 30th, 2018. Radiographic interpretation was coded as positive, negative, or equivocal.Results: Of 241 subjects, the number of positive, negative, and equivocal initial CT results were 154, 50, and 37, respectively. On repeat CT, 190 (78.8%) interpretations were congruent with the original scan. Out of the 21.2% of repeat scans that diverged from the original read, 14 (5.8%) showed positive to negative conversion, 1 (.4%) showed positive to equivocal conversion, 2 (.88%) showed negative to positive conversion, 20 (8.3%) showed equivocal to negative conversion, and 14 (5.8%) showed equivocal to positive conversion. Average time between scans was 4.4 hours, and median length of stay was 10.2 hours.Conclusions: In this retrospective review, most repeat CT scans had no new findings. A small percentage converted to positive, rarely altering clinical management. This study demonstrates the need for continued prospective research to update clinical guidelines that could reduce admission and serial CT scanning for mild TBI.

Predictors of neurosurgical intervention in complicated mild traumatic brain injury patients: a retrospective cohort study

OBJECTIVES

To determine the predicting demographic, clinical and radiological factors for neurosurgical intervention in complicated mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) patients.

METHODS

Design: retrospective multicenter cohort study. Participants: patients aged ≥16 presenting to all level-I trauma centers in Quebec between 09/2016 and 12/2017 with mTBI(GCS 13-15) and complication on initial head CT (intracranial hemorrhage/skull fracture). Procedure: Consecutive medical records were reviewed and separated into two groups: no neurosurgical intervention and neurosurgical intervention (NSI). Main outcome: neurosurgical intervention. Analysis: multiple logistic regression model.

RESULTS

Four hundred and seventy-eight patients were included and 40 underwent NSI. One patient had radiological deterioration but no clinical deterioration prior to surgery. Subdural hemorrhage ≥4 mm width (OR:3.755 [95% CI:1.290-10.928]) and midline shift (OR:7.507 [95% CI: 3.317-16.989]) increased the risk of NSI. Subarachnoid hemorrhage was associated with a lower risk of NSI (OR:0.312 [95% CI: 0.136-0.713]). All other intracranial hemorrhages were not associated with NSI.

CONCLUSION

Radiological deterioration was not associated with the incidence of NSI. Subdural hemorrhage and midline shift should be predicting factors for neurosurgery. Some patients with isolated findings such as subarachnoid hemorrhage could be safely managed in their original center without being transferred to a level-I trauma center.

Retrospective analysis of small intracranial hemorrhage in trauma: Is acute care surgery team management alone safe?

Background: The Brain Injury Guidelines (BIG) provide a validated framework for categorizing patients with small intracranial haemorrhages (ICH) who could be managed by acute care surgery without neurosurgical consultation or repeat head computed tomography in the absence of neurological deterioration. This replication study retrospectively applied BIG criteria to ICH subjects and only included BIG1 and BIG2 subjects.Methods: The trauma registry was queried from 2014 to 2019 for subjects with a traumatic ICH <1 cm, Glasgow Coma Scale score of 14/15 and not on anticoagulation therapy. Patients were then categorized under BIG 1 or BIG2 and outcomes were evaluated.Results: Two hundred fourteen subjects were reviewed (88 BIG1 and 126 BIG2). Twenty-three subjects had worse repeat imaging, but only one had worsening exam that resolved spontaneously. None required neurosurgical intervention. One died of non-neurological causes.Conclusions: Retrospective analysis supported our hypothesis that patients categorized as BIG1 or BIG2 could have been safely managed by acute care surgeons without neurosurgical consultation or repeat head imaging. A review of minor worsening on repeat imaging without changes in neurological exams and no need for neurosurgical interventions supports this evidence-based approach to the management of small intracranial haemorrhages.

Utility of Head Computed Tomography Scans Before Outpatient Follow-up for Low-Risk Mild Traumatic Brain Injury

BACKGROUND

Neurosurgeons are frequently consulted for traumatic brain injuries (TBIs) resulting in intracranial hemorrhage (ICH). After inpatient confirmation of hemorrhage stability, outpatient head computed tomography (CT) is often performed to assess for hemorrhage resolution. Our objective was to assess the practice patterns and clinical utility of routine outpatient head CT scans for patients with mild TBI (mTBI).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective review was performed on all adult mTBI patients with ICH who presented to a level I trauma center over a 4-year period. A combination of the patient's initial clinical evaluation and CT findings was used to identify mTBI patients at low risk for neurologic deterioration and neurosurgical intervention. Findings from the outpatient follow-up clinical evaluation and head CT were assessed. Patients without outpatient follow-up within 3 months were excluded.

RESULTS

Forty-nine patients met inclusion criteria for the study. Thirty-two had an outpatient head CT before their follow-up appointment. Twenty-one patients had at least 1 neurologic finding at the earliest follow-up appointment. All patients except those with a subdural hematoma (SDH) had smaller or resolving ICH on outpatient CT scans. Seven patients with an SDH had unchanged or expanded hemorrhage on outpatient imaging, 2 of whom had traumatic brain injury-related hospitalizations and 1 of whom underwent neurosurgical intervention due to an enlarging SDH.

CONCLUSIONS

Routine outpatient head CT scans before follow-up for low-risk mTBI patients without an SDH appears to have limited clinical utility. In low-risk mTBI patients with an SDH, obtaining an outpatient head CT is reasonable to monitor for resolution.

Assessing the efficacy of mild traumatic brain injury management

OBJECTIVE

Intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) is frequently found on computed tomography (CT) after mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) prompting transfer to centers with neurosurgical coverage and repeat imaging to confirm hemorrhage stability. Studies suggest routine repeat imaging has little utility in patients with minimal ICH, no anticoagulant/antiplatelet use, and no neurological decline. Additionally, it is unclear which mTBI patients benefit from transfer for neurosurgery consultation. The authors sought to assess the clinical utility and cost effectiveness of routine repeat head CTs and transfer to tertiary centers in patients with low-risk, mTBI.

METHODS

Retrospective evaluation of patients receiving a neurosurgical consultation for TBI during a 4-year period was performed at a level 1 trauma center. Patients were stratified according to risk for neurosurgical intervention based on their initial clinical evaluation and head CT. Only patients with low-risk, mTBI were included.

RESULTS

Of 531 patients, 119 met inclusion criteria. Eighty-eight (74.0 %) received two or more CTs. Direct cost of repeat imaging was $273,374. Thirty-seven (31.1 %) were transferred to our facility from hospitals without neurosurgical coverage, costing $61,384. No patient had neurosurgical intervention or mTBI-related in-hospital mortality despite enlarging ICH on repeat CT in three patients. Two patients had mTBI related 30-day readmission for seizure without ICH expansion.

CONCLUSION

Routine repeat head CT or transfer of low-risk, mTBI patients to a tertiary center did not result in neurosurgical intervention. Serial neurological examinations may be a safe, cost-effective alternative to repeat imaging for select mTBI patients. A large prospective analysis is warranted for further evaluation.

Examining the Emergency Medical Treatment and Active Labor Act: impact on telemedicine for neurotrauma

The Emergency Medical Treatment and Active Labor Act (EMTALA) protects patient access to emergency medical treatment regardless of insurance or socioeconomic status. A significant result of the COVID-19 pandemic has been the rapid acceleration in the adoption of telemedicine services across many facets of healthcare. However, very little literature exists regarding the use of telemedicine in the context of EMTALA. This work aimed to evaluate the potential to expand the usage of telemedicine services for neurotrauma to reduce transfer rates, minimize movement of patients across borders, and alleviate the burden on tertiary care hospitals involved in the care of patients with COVID-19 during a global pandemic. In this paper, the authors outline EMTALA provisions, provide examples of EMTALA violations involving neurosurgical care, and propose guidelines for the creation of telemedicine protocols between referring and consulting institutions.

Putting a halt to unnecessary transfers: Do patients with isolated subarachnoid hemorrhage and Glasgow Coma Scale of 13 to 15 need a trauma center?

OBJECTIVES

Trauma patients with isolated subarachnoid hemorrhage (iSAH) presenting to nontrauma centers are typically transferred to an institution with neurosurgical availability. However, recent studies suggest that iSAH is a benign clinical entity with an excellent prognosis. This investigation aims to evaluate the neurosurgical outcomes of traumatic iSAH with Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) of 13 to 15 who were transferred to a higher level of care.

METHODS

The American College of Surgeon Trauma Quality Improvement Program was retrospectively analyzed from 2010 to 2015 for transferred patients 16 years and older with blunt trauma, iSAH, and GCS of 13 or greater. Those with any other body region Abbreviated Injury Scale of 3 or greater, positive or unknown alcohol/drug status, and requiring mechanical ventilation were excluded. The primary outcome was need for neurosurgical intervention (i.e., intracranial monitor or craniotomy/craniectomy).

RESULTS

A total of 11,380 patients with blunt trauma, iSAH, and GCS of 13 to 15 were transferred to an American College of Surgeon level I/II from 2010 to 2015. These patients were 65 years and older (median, 72 [interquartile range (IQR), 59-81]) and white (83%) and had one or more comorbidities (72%). Eighteen percent reported a bleeding diathesis/chronic anticoagulation on admission. Most patients had fallen (80%), had a GCS of 15 (84%), and were mildly injured (median Injury Severity Score, 9 [IQR, 5-14]). Only 1.7% required neurosurgical intervention with 55% of patients being admitted to the intensive care unit for a median of 2 days (IQR, 1-3 days). Furthermore, 2.2% of the patients died. The median hospital length of stay was only 3 days (IQR, 2-5 days), and the most common discharge location was home with self-care (62%). Patient factors favoring neurosurgical intervention included high Injury Severity Score, low GCS, and chronic anticoagulation.

CONCLUSION

Trauma patients transferred for iSAH with GCS of 13 to 15 are at very low risk for requiring neurosurgical intervention.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic/care management, Level IV.

Secondary Overtriage of Trauma Patients: Analysis of Clinical and Geographic Patterns

BACKGROUND

The purpose of a trauma system is to match patients' needs with hospitals' ability to care for them, recognizing that the highest levels of care cannot be provided in all locations. This means that some patients will need to be transferred from a local facility to a higher level of care. Unnecessary transfers are expensive and inconvenient to patients and families. The aim of this study is to analyze the pattern of secondary transfers in a regional trauma system.

METHODS

This is a retrospective analysis. We included patients aged 16 y and older who were transferred to University of Alabama at Birmingham Hospital between 2014 and 2018. We conducted bivariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis to identify clinical and organizational predictors of requiring a critical intervention, early discharge, intensive care unit admission, and mortality. Rather than treating each injury as isolated, we analyzed injury patterns.

RESULTS

A total of3824 patients met the inclusion criteria. Of them, 664 patients (17.4%) required a critical intervention, 635 (16.6%) were discharged within 24 h, 1356 (35.5%) were admitted to the intensive care unit, and 172 (4.0%) patients died. Univariate and multivariate analyses revealed many positive associations, with regard to injury pattern, originating center, and insurance status.

CONCLUSIONS

There are patterns in the data, and further study is required to understand drivers of secondary overtriage, and how we might be able to address this problem. Reducing the number of unnecessary transfers is a difficult task, which will require engagement at all levels of the trauma system.

Rapid Discharge After Interfacility Transfer for Mild Traumatic Intracranial Hemorrhage: Frequency and Associated Factors

Introduction

Traumatic intracranial hemorrhage (TIH), brain injury with radiographic hemorrhage, is a common emergency department (ED) presentation, and encompasses a wide range of clinical syndromes. Patients with moderate and severe neurotrauma (Glasgow Coma Scale [GCS] < 13) with intracranial hemorrhage require care at a trauma center with neurosurgical capabilities. However, many patients with mild traumatic intracranial hemorrhage (mTIH), defined as radiographic bleeding and GCS ≥ 13, do not require operative intervention or intensive care unit monitoring, but are still routinely transferred to tertiary care centers. We hypothesized that a significant proportion of patients are managed non-operatively and are discharged within 24 hours of admission.

Methods

This was a retrospective, observational study of consecutive patients age ≥ 16 years, GCS ≥ 13 who were transferred to an urban, medical school-affiliated, 100,000 annual visit ED over a seven-year period with blunt isolated mTIH. The primary outcome was discharge within 24 hours of admission. We measured rates of neurosurgical intervention, computed tomography hemorrhage progression, and neurologic deterioration as well as other demographic and clinical variables.

Results

There were 1079 transferred patients with isolated mTIH. Of these, 92.4% were treated non-operatively and 35.8% were discharged within 24 hours of presentation to the tertiary ED. Patient characteristics associated with rapid discharge after transfer include a GCS of 15 (odds ratio [OR] 2.9, 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.9 – 4.4), subdural hematoma ≤ 6mm (OR 3.1, 95% CI, 2.2 – 4.5) or the presence of an isolated subarachnoid hemorrhage (OR 1.7, 95% CI, 1.3 – 2.4). Of patients with length of stay < 24 hours, 79.8% were discharged directly from the ED or ED observation unit.

Conclusion

Patients transferred to tertiary care centers are frequently discharged after brief observation without intervention. Risk can be predicted by clinical and radiographic data. Further prospective research is required to determine a safe cohort of patients who could be managed at community sites.