Effect of focused protocol on reducing radiation dose for children who require computed tomography for suspected appendicitis

A Magnetic Resonance Imaging Protocol for the Evaluation of Pediatric Postappendectomy Abscess: A Quality Improvement Project

INTRODUCTION

Computed tomography (CT) scans are often used when cross-sectional imaging is required for evaluation of postappendectomy abscess, exposing children to a source of ionizing radiation. Our aim was to decrease the use of CT scans in pediatric postappendectomy patients by 50% in 12 mo and to sustain those results for 1 y.

METHODS

A comprehensive magnetic resonance imaging protocol was introduced in 2018 at a tertiary children's hospital within a general health system to replace CT scans in suspected pediatric postappendectomy abscess. Diagnostic and clinical outcomes were compared preprotocol (2015-2017) and postprotocol (2018-2022) implementation using standard univariate statistics. P < 0.05 was considered significant. Quality improvement methodology was used to design and implement the protocol.

RESULTS

Sixty eight pediatric postappendectomy patients received cross-sectional imaging during the study period. Overall, CT scans were used exclusively (100%, n = 27) in the preimplementation period compared to 31.7% (n = 13) of cross-sectional imaging in the postimplementation period. However, in the first year of protocol implementation, CT scan use only decreased to 78% of cross-sectional studies performed. The majority of protocol deviations (54%) also occurred in this time period. With improved education and reinforcement, CT scan utilization decreased to approximately 24% of cross-sectional studies annually. Missed abscess rate, time to diagnosis, drainage procedure type, readmission, and reoperation were similar between preimplementation and postimplementation periods.

CONCLUSIONS

Implementation of a postappendectomy abscess magnetic resonance imaging protocol was associated with decreased CT utilization in the pediatric population, while maintaining comparable diagnostic evaluation and clinical outcomes. Adherence to quality improvement principles facilitated achieving goals and sustaining gains.

Time to Surgery Does Not Impact Outcome in Pediatric Appendicitis

Background: Despite the high prevalence of acute appendicitis in children and substantial resource utilization associated with this condition, no consensus has been reached on optimal timing for performing appendectomies. The aim of this study was to examine the association between time to appendectomy and outcomes and assess the feasibility of delayed appendectomy in children. Patients and Methods: We performed a retrospective analysis of all patients younger than 14 years of age undergoing an appendectomy for suspected appendicitis. We divided our patients into two groups based on whether their time to appendectomy was shorter or longer than eight hours: group A, early appendectomy and group B, delayed appendectomy. Then we compared the two study groups regarding demographic, clinical, and radiographic characteristics, peri-operative data, and outcomes. Results: During the eight-year study period, a total of 1,141 patients underwent appendectomies. After applying exclusion criteria, 852 children were included: 544 (63.8%) in group A and 308 (36.2%) in group B. There were no differences in the rate of complicated appendicitis at exploration, post-operative complications, length of post-operative hospital stay, and 30-day re-admission rate between the two study groups. Conclusions: Our study demonstrated that delaying appendectomy within 24 hours of presentation is safe and feasible for pediatric acute appendicitis. Therefore, patients presenting during nighttime hours could be initially treated conservatively with antibiotic agents. This allows the surgeon to delay surgery to the following day.