Regulator of G-protein signalling 3 and its regulator microRNA-133a mediate cell proliferation in gastric cancer

Unraveling the prognostic significance of RGS gene family in gastric cancer and the potential implication of RGS4 in regulating tumor-infiltrating fibroblast

Regulator of G-protein signaling (RGS) proteins are regulators of signal transduction mediated by G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs). Current studies have shown that some molecules in the RGS gene family are related to the occurrence, development and poor prognosis of malignant tumors. However, the RGS gene family has been rarely studied in gastric cancer. In this study, we explored the mutation and expression profile of RGS gene family in gastric cancer, and evaluated the prognostic value of RGS expression. Then we established a prognostic model based on RGS gene family and performed functional analysis. Further studies showed that RGS4, as an independent prognostic predictor, may play an important role in regulating fibroblasts in the immune microenvironment. In conclusion, this study explores the value of RGS gene family in gastric cancer, which is of great significance for predicting the prognosis and guiding the treatment of gastric cancer.

Function and regulation of RGS family members in solid tumours: a comprehensive review

G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) play a key role in regulating the homeostasis of the internal environment and are closely associated with tumour progression as major mediators of cellular signalling. As a diverse and multifunctional group of proteins, the G protein signalling regulator (RGS) family was proven to be involved in the cellular transduction of GPCRs. Growing evidence has revealed dysregulation of RGS proteins as a common phenomenon and highlighted the key roles of these proteins in human cancers. Furthermore, their differential expression may be a potential biomarker for tumour diagnosis, treatment and prognosis. Most importantly, there are few systematic reviews on the functional/mechanistic characteristics and clinical application of RGS family members at present. In this review, we focus on the G-protein signalling regulator (RGS) family, which includes more than 20 family members. We analysed the classification, basic structure, and major functions of the RGS family members. Moreover, we summarize the expression changes of each RGS family member in various human cancers and their important roles in regulating cancer cell proliferation, stem cell maintenance, tumorigenesis and cancer metastasis. On this basis, we outline the molecular signalling pathways in which some RGS family members are involved in tumour progression. Finally, their potential application in the precise diagnosis, prognosis and treatment of different types of cancers and the main possible problems for clinical application at present are discussed. Our review provides a comprehensive understanding of the role and potential mechanisms of RGS in regulating tumour progression. Video Abstract.

RGS proteins and their roles in cancer: friend or foe?

As negative modulators of G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) signaling, regulators of G protein signaling (RGS) proteins facilitate various downstream cellular signalings through regulating kinds of heterotrimeric G proteins by stimulating the guanosine triphosphatase (GTPase) activity of G-protein α (Gα) subunits. The expression of RGS proteins is dynamically and precisely mediated by several different mechanisms including epigenetic regulation, transcriptional regulation -and post-translational regulation. Emerging evidence has shown that RGS proteins act as important mediators in controlling essential cellular processes including cell proliferation, survival -and death via regulating downstream cellular signaling activities, indicating that RGS proteins are fundamentally involved in sustaining normal physiological functions and dysregulation of RGS proteins (such as aberrant expression of RGS proteins) is closely associated with pathologies of many diseases such as cancer. In this review, we summarize the molecular mechanisms governing the expression of RGS proteins, and further discuss the relationship of RGS proteins and cancer.

Pseudogene UBE2MP1 derived transcript enhances in vitro cell proliferation and apoptosis resistance of hepatocellular carcinoma cells through miR-145-5p/RGS3 axis

Pseudogenes are barely transcribed at normal, while the anomalous transcripts of them are mostly regarded as long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs), which play potential functions in human tumorigenicity and development. The exact effects of pseudogene-derived transcripts on hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) are ambiguous. According to our previous research and constructed database on the HCC-related lncRNAs, we noticed that UBE2MP1 was transcriptionally activated in HCC as a pseudogene from the ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme member UBE2M. In this study, we validated the high expression of the UBE2MP1 transcript in HCC and its adverse correlation with dismal outcomes for the patients. UBE2MP1 depletion at the transcript level significantly impaired cell proliferation and apoptosis resistance in HCC cell lines. Notably, we discovered that the UBE2MP1 transcript shared a specific sequence, binding to the miR-145-5p seed region with a typical ceRNA effect. Simultaneously, we verified an axis of miR-145-5p/RGS3 in HCC cells, which promoted cell proliferation and apoptosis resistance with significance. And modulation of UE2MP1 could remarkably affect RGS3 expression and consequentially influence HCC cell growth in vitro. And combined with the rescue experiment modulating either miR-145-5p or RGS3 furtherly indicated UBE2MP1 as an upstream regulator of the axis in promoting HCC cell growth and maintenance. Thus, our findings provide new strategies for HCC prevention and individual treatment.

A Genome-Wide Investigation of Effects of Aberrant DNA Methylation on the Usage of Alternative Promoters in Hepatocellular Carcinoma

BACKGROUND

The alternative usage of promoters provides a way to regulate gene expression, has a significant influence on the transcriptome, and contributes to the cellular transformation of cancer. However, the function of alternative promoters (APs) in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) has not been systematically studied yet. In addition, the potential mechanism of regulation to the usage of APs remains unclear. DNA methylation, one of the most aberrant epigenetic modifications in cancers, is known to regulate transcriptional activity. Whether DNA methylation regulates the usage of APs needs to be explored. Here, we aim to investigate the effects of DNA methylation on usage of APs in HCC.

METHODS

Promoter activities were calculated based on RNA-seq data. Functional enrichment analysis was implemented to conduct GO terms. Correlation tests were used to detect the correlation between promoter activity and methylation status. The LASSO regression model was used to generate a diagnostic model. Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to compare the overall survival between high and low methylation groups. RNA-seq and whole-genome bisulfite sequencing (WGBS) in HCC samples were performed to validate the correlation of promoter activity and methylation.

RESULTS

We identified 855 APs in total, which could be well used to distinguish cancer from normal samples. The correlation of promoter activity and DNA methylation in APs was observed, and the APs with negative correlation were defined as methylation-regulated APs (mrAPs). Six mrAPs were identified to generate a diagnostic model with good performance (AUC = 0.97). Notably, the majority of mrAPs had CpG sites that could be used to predict clinical outcomes by methylation status. Finally, we verified 85.6% of promoter activity variation and 92.3% of methylation changes in our paired RNA-seq and WGBS samples, respectively. The negative correlation between promoter activity and methylation status was further confirmed in our HCC samples.

CONCLUSION

The aberrant methylation status plays a critical role in the precision usage of APs in HCC, which sheds light on the mechanism of cancer development and provides a new insight into cancer screening and treatment.

Genotyping Helicobacter pylori antibiotic resistance - and virulence-associated genes in patients with gastric cancer in Wenzhou, China

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS

Helicobacter pylori infection affects approximately 50% of the global population and has become a serious health concern related to gastric cancer, gastritis, and peptic ulcers. This organism acquires drug resistance through gene mutations, and its increasing resistance to antibiotics has severely influenced the effectiveness of eradication efforts. Therefore, we designed this study to determine the prevalence of H. pylori virulence- (cagA and vacA) and antibiotic resistance - associated genotypes in patients with gastric cancer infected with H. pylori in Whenzhou, China.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We used polymerase chain reaction (PCR) to confirm H. pylori in cancerous and paracancerous tissue specimens from 225 patients. Then we tested the prevalence of virulence- and antibiotic resistance - associated genotypes in H. pylori using a PCR-based DNA-sequencing assay.

RESULTS

We observed H. pylori DNA in 222 of the 225 patients and found the most prevalent virulence-associated genotypes in cagA⁺ (97.75%) and vacAs1m1 (93.25%). Metronidazole resistance - associated gene mutation was G616A in rdxA; levofloxacin resistance - associated gene mutations were N87K, N87I, and D91G in gyrA; clarithromycin resistance - associated gene mutations were A2143G and A2142G in 23SrRNA; and amoxicillin resistance - associated gene mutation was T556S in pbp1. The most prevalent mutation related to antibiotic resistance was present in rdxA (97.30%), followed by gyrA (41.44%) and 23SrRNA (16.67%); the least prevalent was in pbp1 (2.25%). We observed single-gene mutations in 102 patients (45.95%) and found mutations in multiple genes (≥2 genes) in 116 patients (52.25%).

CONCLUSION

Patients with gastric cancer in Wenzhou, China, have high incidence infection caused by H. pylori with high-toxicity virulence genotypes. The frequency of gene mutations associated with metronidazole, levofloxacin, and clarithromycin resistances was high and that associated with amoxicillin resistance was relatively low. The mutation patterns were diverse, and the rates of multiple gene mutations were high.