1
|
Ball EM, Costello RA, Ballen CJ, Graze RM, Burkholder EW. Challenging Misconceptions about Race in Undergraduate Genetics. CBE LIFE SCIENCES EDUCATION 2024; 23:ar32. [PMID: 38981004 DOI: 10.1187/cbe.23-12-0228] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 07/11/2024]
Abstract
Racial biases, which harm marginalized and excluded communities, may be combatted by clarifying misconceptions about race during biology lessons. We developed a human genetics laboratory activity that challenges the misconception that race is biological (biological essentialism). We assessed the relationship between this activity and student outcomes using a survey of students' attitudes about biological essentialism and color-evasive ideology and a concept inventory about phylogeny and human diversity. Students in the human genetics laboratory activity showed a significant decrease in their acceptance of biological essentialism compared with a control group, but did not show changes in color-evasive ideology. Students in both groups exhibited increased knowledge in both areas of the concept inventory, but the gains were larger in the human genetics laboratory. In the second iteration of this activity, we found that only white students' decreases in biological essentialist beliefs were significant and the activity failed to decrease color-evasive ideologies for all students. Concept inventory gains were similar and significant for both white and non-white students in this iteration. Our findings underscore the effectiveness of addressing misconceptions about the biological origins of race and encourage more research on ways to effectively change damaging student attitudes about race in undergraduate genetics education.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Erin M Ball
- Department of Biological Sciences, Auburn University, Auburn, AL 36849
| | - Robin A Costello
- Department of Biological Sciences, Auburn University, Auburn, AL 36849
| | - Cissy J Ballen
- Department of Biological Sciences, Auburn University, Auburn, AL 36849
| | - Rita M Graze
- Department of Biological Sciences, Auburn University, Auburn, AL 36849
| | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Lewis ACF, Chisholm RL, Connolly JJ, Esplin ED, Glessner J, Gordon A, Green RC, Hakonarson H, Harr M, Holm IA, Jarvik GP, Karlson E, Kenny EE, Kottyan L, Lennon N, Linder JE, Luo Y, Martin LJ, Perez E, Puckelwartz MJ, Rasmussen-Torvik LJ, Sabatello M, Sharp RR, Smoller JW, Sterling R, Terek S, Wei WQ, Fullerton SM. Managing differential performance of polygenic risk scores across groups: Real-world experience of the eMERGE Network. Am J Hum Genet 2024; 111:999-1005. [PMID: 38688278 PMCID: PMC11179244 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2024.04.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/27/2024] [Revised: 04/10/2024] [Accepted: 04/11/2024] [Indexed: 05/02/2024] Open
Abstract
The differential performance of polygenic risk scores (PRSs) by group is one of the major ethical barriers to their clinical use. It is also one of the main practical challenges for any implementation effort. The social repercussions of how people are grouped in PRS research must be considered in communications with research participants, including return of results. Here, we outline the decisions faced and choices made by a large multi-site clinical implementation study returning PRSs to diverse participants in handling this issue of differential performance. Our approach to managing the complexities associated with the differential performance of PRSs serves as a case study that can help future implementers of PRSs to plot an anticipatory course in response to this issue.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anna C F Lewis
- Edmond and Lily Safra Center for Ethics, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, USA; Department of Genetics, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA; Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, MA, USA; Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
| | - Rex L Chisholm
- Center for Genetic Medicine, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL, USA
| | - John J Connolly
- Center for Applied Genomics, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | | | - Joe Glessner
- Center for Applied Genomics, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Adam Gordon
- Center for Genetic Medicine, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL, USA; Department of Pharmacology, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL, USA
| | - Robert C Green
- Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA; Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, MA, USA; Ariadne Labs, Boston, MA, USA; Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Hakon Hakonarson
- Center for Applied Genomics, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA, USA; Department of Pediatrics, The Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA; Division of Human Genetics, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA, USA; Division of Pulmonary Medicine, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Margaret Harr
- Center for Applied Genomics, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Ingrid A Holm
- Division of Genetics and Genomics, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA; Department of Pediatrics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Gail P Jarvik
- Division of Medical Genetics, Department of Medicine and Department of Genome Science, University of Washington Medical Center, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Elizabeth Karlson
- Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA; Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Eimear E Kenny
- Institute for Genomic Health, Icahn School of Medicine, New York City, NY, USA; Center for Clinical Translational Genomics, Icahn School of Medicine, New York City, NY, USA; Division of Genomic Medicine, Department of Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine, New York City, NY, USA; Department of Genetics and Genomic Sciences, Icahn School of Medicine, New York City, NY, USA
| | - Leah Kottyan
- Center for Autoimmune Genomics and Etiology, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH, USA
| | - Niall Lennon
- Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, MA, USA
| | - Jodell E Linder
- Vanderbilt Institute for Clinical and Translational Research, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Yuan Luo
- Department of Preventive Medicine, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL, USA
| | - Lisa J Martin
- Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH, USA; University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, OH, USA
| | - Emma Perez
- Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Megan J Puckelwartz
- Center for Genetic Medicine, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL, USA; Department of Pharmacology, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL, USA
| | - Laura J Rasmussen-Torvik
- Center for Genetic Medicine, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL, USA; Department of Preventive Medicine, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL, USA
| | - Maya Sabatello
- Center for Precision Medicine and Genomics, Department of Medicine, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York City, NY, USA; Division of Ethics, Department of Medical Humanities and Ethics, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York City, NY, USA
| | | | - Jordan W Smoller
- Center for Precision Psychiatry, Department of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA; Psychiatric & Neurodevelopmental Genetics Unit, Center for Genomic Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA; Stanley Center for Psychiatric Research, Broad Institute, Cambridge, MA, USA
| | - Rene Sterling
- Division of Genomics and Society, National Human Genome Research Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Shannon Terek
- Center for Applied Genomics, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Wei-Qi Wei
- Department of Biomedical Informatics, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Stephanie M Fullerton
- Department of Bioethics & Humanities, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Lappalainen T, Li YI, Ramachandran S, Gusev A. Genetic and molecular architecture of complex traits. Cell 2024; 187:1059-1075. [PMID: 38428388 DOI: 10.1016/j.cell.2024.01.023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/03/2023] [Revised: 12/20/2023] [Accepted: 01/16/2024] [Indexed: 03/03/2024]
Abstract
Human genetics has emerged as one of the most dynamic areas of biology, with a broadening societal impact. In this review, we discuss recent achievements, ongoing efforts, and future challenges in the field. Advances in technology, statistical methods, and the growing scale of research efforts have all provided many insights into the processes that have given rise to the current patterns of genetic variation. Vast maps of genetic associations with human traits and diseases have allowed characterization of their genetic architecture. Finally, studies of molecular and cellular effects of genetic variants have provided insights into biological processes underlying disease. Many outstanding questions remain, but the field is well poised for groundbreaking discoveries as it increases the use of genetic data to understand both the history of our species and its applications to improve human health.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tuuli Lappalainen
- New York Genome Center, New York, NY, USA; Science for Life Laboratory, Department of Gene Technology, KTH Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, Sweden.
| | - Yang I Li
- Section of Genetic Medicine, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA; Department of Human Genetics, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Sohini Ramachandran
- Ecology, Evolution and Organismal Biology, Center for Computational Molecular Biology, and the Data Science Institute, Brown University, Providence, RI 029129, USA
| | - Alexander Gusev
- Harvard Medical School and Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Nankya H, Wamala E, Alibu VP, Barugahare J. Community engagement in genetics and genomics research: a qualitative study of the perspectives of genetics and genomics researchers in Uganda. BMC Med Ethics 2024; 25:1. [PMID: 38166828 PMCID: PMC10763360 DOI: 10.1186/s12910-023-00995-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/07/2023] [Accepted: 12/17/2023] [Indexed: 01/05/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Generally, there is unanimity about the value of community engagement in health-related research. There is also a growing tendency to view genetics and genomics research (GGR) as a special category of research, the conduct of which including community engagement (CE) as needing additional caution. One of the motivations of this study was to establish how differently if at all, we should think about CE in GGR. AIM To assess the perspectives of genetics and genomics researchers in Uganda on CE in GGR. METHOD A cross-sectional qualitative study was conducted at Makerere University and Uganda Virus Research Institute. Twenty-five individuals participated, the majority being male (sixteen). Participants included nineteen genetics and genomics researchers (researchers and research coordinators), two CE officers, three nurses and one nursing counsellor. Data were collected using in-depth interviews and analyzed in a thematic manner using NVivo version 12 Plus. STUDY FINDINGS Thirteen of the respondents had conducted CE in their GGR in either a geographical and disease-specific community. Some respondents said CE principles are the same and there is no need for special consideration for CE in GGR. Others gave ethical issues in GGR that require special consideration for CE in such research and these were categorized into six themes: GGR is new to communities, Difficulty in communicating GGR by the researchers, Genes are shared in communities, Cultural sensitivities against GGR, Community attitude toward GGR, Some GGR studies take long to end, and Negotiation of research benefits. Special considerations for CE when conducting GGR were suggested and categorized into seven themes: creating awareness of GGR in communities, obtaining both community acceptance and individual consent, CE team composition, involve communities in solving GGR challenges, prolong CE in some GGR, develop guidelines for CE in GGR, and legal considerations on GGR. CONCLUSION GGR was characterized by special issues that require special CE considerations for such research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Harriet Nankya
- Department of Philosophy, College of Humanities and Social Sciences, Makerere University, P. O Box 7062, Kampala, Uganda.
| | - Edward Wamala
- Department of Philosophy, College of Humanities and Social Sciences, Makerere University, P. O Box 7062, Kampala, Uganda
| | - Vincent Pius Alibu
- Department of Biochemistry and Sports Science, College of Natural Sciences, Makerere University, P. O Box 7062, Kampala, Uganda
| | - John Barugahare
- Department of Philosophy, College of Humanities and Social Sciences, Makerere University, P. O Box 7062, Kampala, Uganda
| |
Collapse
|