Assessment of surgical instrument bioburden after steam sterilization: A pilot study

Updated review of wet pack complications in pulse vacuum pressure steam sterilisation processes in central sterile supply departments

The quality of sterilisation and disinfection in a central sterile supply department is directly related to the quality of the hospital services and the patients' safety. Wet packs occasionally occur following the process of pressure steam sterilisation; reducing this occurrence is an important issue. Therefore, the causes of wet pack following sterilisation were analysed to identify the influencing factors and suggest improvements to prevent its occurrence. Understanding the sterilisation process and possible causes of exposure helps with risk assessment and identifying necessary corrective measures.

The Surgical Instrument Sterilization Process: What Every Surgeon Should Know

» The phases of the sterilization process for surgical equipment are cleaning, disinfection, and sterilization.» Following manufacturer and regulatory guidelines will minimize contamination throughout the sterilization process.» Immediate use steam sterilization, when used appropriately, is a reasonably safe option to be used at the discretion of the operating surgeon.

Clinical Issues-July 2021

Debris in sterilized instrument sets Key words: organic debris, inorganic debris, instrument sets, sterile processing, sterilizing agent. Preventing debris in sterilized instrument sets Key words: debris, instrument sets, sterile processing equipment, instructions for use (IFU), quality assurance. Bone cement precautions during pregnancy Key words: bone cement, exposure, methyl methacrylate (MMA), pregnant. Using a bed sheet or blanket for positioning Key words: patient positioning devices, improvised positioning device, pressure distribution, skin shear, pressure injury. Laundering of cloth head coverings Key words: laundering, head covering, reusable cloth hat, surgical attire, disposable bouffant.

3D printing of face shields to meet the immediate need for PPE in an anesthesiology department during the COVID-19 pandemic

Background

Anesthesia providers are at risk for contracting COVID-19 due to close patient contact, especially during shortages of personal protective equipment. We present an easy to follow and detailed protocol for producing 3D printed face shields and an effective decontamination protocol, allowing their reuse.

Methods

The University of Nebraska Medical Center (UNMC) produced face shields using a combination of 3D printing and assembly with commonly available products, and produced a simple decontamination protocol to allow their reuse. To evaluate the effectiveness of the decontamination protocol, we inoculated bacterial suspensions of E. coli and S. aureus on to the face shield components, performed the decontamination procedure, and finally swabbed and enumerated organisms onto plates that were incubated for 12-24 hours. Decontamination effectiveness was evaluated using the average log10 reduction in colony counts.

Results

Approximately 112 face shields were constructed and made available for use in 72 hours. These methods were successfully implemented for in-house production at UNMC and at Tripler Army Medical Center (Honolulu, Hawaii). Overall, the decontamination protocol was highly effective against both E. coli and S. aureus, achieving a ≥4 log10 (99.99%) reduction in colony counts for every replicate from each component of the face shield unit.

Discussion

Face shields not only act as a barrier against the soiling of N95 face masks, they also serve as more effective eye protection from respiratory droplets over standard eye shields. Implementation of decontamination protocols successfully allowed face shield and N95 mask reuse, offering a higher level of protection for anesthesiology providers at the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic.

Conclusions

In a time of urgent need, our protocol enabled the rapid production of face shields by individuals with little to no 3D printing experience, and provided a simple and effective decontamination protocol allowing reuse of the face shields.

Monitoring Steam Penetration in Channeled Instruments: An Evidence-Based Worst-Case for Practical Situations

Steam sterilization of channeled medical devices requires steam penetration into narrow channels. However, a quantitative characterization of this phenomenon in practical situations is lacking. This study evaluates the effect of load, loading pattern, and wrapping system on steam penetration into channels. We tested the hypothesis that a 70 cm tube with one closed end could be representative of the worst case for steam penetration in wrapped channeled instruments in practical conditions. A validated sterilization process was run in a sterilizer equipped with infrared sensors for the measurement of water vapor fraction (WVF). WVF values collected at the closed end of an unwrapped 70 cm reference tube were compared to those obtained at the closed end of wrapped 50 cm test tubes, representative for channeled devices in the clinical practice. The open ends of the test tubes were placed inside packs, testing the effects of different combinations of wrappings, load amounts, and pack positions. The worst case for steam penetration was experimentally defined as the condition showing the lowest WVF value during the exposure phase. WVF values at the closed end of 50 cm long tubes were affected by load amount, wrapping, and pack position. Steam penetration was higher for heavier loads in rigid containers, but lower for heavier loads in soft wrappings (pouch, non-woven fabric, and crepe). In all the tested combinations of load/wrappings related to the clinical practice the 70 cm reference tube displayed lower WVF values than the wrapped 50 cm test tubes, indicating worse steam penetration in the reference than test tubes. Our findings provide experimental evidence that a 70 cm is the worst case in all practical combinations of load and wrapping encountered in the field. The 70 cm tube is a representative for a wrapped 50 cm channel with one end closed and for a wrapped 100 cm channel with both ends open. A measuring system integrating the WVF sensor on a 70 cm tube may provide a physics-based, quantitative steam penetration test for real-time monitoring of the steam sterilization process of channeled instruments.

Design and implementation of the infection prevention program into risk management: Managing high level disinfection and sterilization in the outpatient setting

Reusable, invasive medical devices within the outpatient setting pose a risk for patient harm. Ineffective disinfection of medical devices can potentially lead to transmission of pathogens between patients; and improper handling can lead to patient injury. A risk assessment was conducted, and the results strongly supported the necessity to develop a robust infection prevention program within the risk management department. This exclusive program was a proactive approach to preventing patient exposure within our healthcare system. Designing and integrating an Infection Prevention program into the Risk Management Department presented challenges, especially with the magnitude of devices and lack of standardization throughout our 33 clinics. Key components of the program included: capturing an accurate inventory of devices throughout the system, hiring a sterile processing expert, engaging support from senior leadership, adhering to rigorous auditing processes, and establishing a staff competency training structure. Since the program was launched 2 years ago, outcomes include: identification of high-risk practices with immediate resolution, increase in average clinic compliance to device reprocessing standards from 88% to 99%, elimination of 71% of scope reprocessing and 39% of instrument sterilization by clinic staff with allocation to central sterile processing departments, and development of a staff competency training structure.