Making sense out of wavefront sensing

Wavefront aberrometry repeatability and agreement—A comparison between Pentacam AXL Wave, iTrace and OPD‐Scan III

INTRODUCTION

To compare intrasession agreement and repeatability of wavefront aberration measurements from three different aberrometers obtained using Hartmann-Shack, ray tracing and automated retinoscopy methods, as well as their interdevice agreement.

METHODS

Three consecutive measurements were obtained using the Pentacam AXL Wave, the iTrace and the OPD-Scan III in 47 eyes of 47 patients. Wavefront refractions, root mean square of total aberrations (RMS total), RMS of higher-order aberrations (HOA) and second-, third- and fourth-order HOAs were exported for 4-mm pupils. Wavefront refractions were converted into vector components: M, J₀ and J₄₅ . Intrasession agreement and repeatability were evaluated using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) and repeatability coefficients (RCs); interdevice agreement was assessed using the Bland-Altman method.

RESULTS

The intrasession agreement and repeatability of RMS HOA were comparable between the three devices; both the Pentacam AXL Wave and the OPD-Scan III had better intrasession agreement and repeatability for the RMS total than the iTrace (p ≤ 0.02). Intrasession repeatability for the majority of second- and third-order aberrations was better on the Pentacam AXL Wave than on the iTrace (p ≤ 0.01) and OPD-Scan III (p ≤ 0.04), although their agreement and repeatability in spherical aberration were comparable (p ≥ 0.24). Significant systematic differences and proportional bias were detected for almost all refraction power vectors and Zernike coefficients among the three devices.

CONCLUSIONS

In this study, all three devices provided good-to-excellent agreement for aberration measurements. Most of the individual Zernike's components were not exchangeable between different aberrometers. Their relative intrasession performance in agreement and repeatability varied significantly across different ocular aberration parameters.

Anatomical and Visual Outcomes after LASIK Performed in Myopic Eyes with the WaveLight® Refractive Suite (Alcon® Laboratories Inc., USA)

Purpose

To evaluate changes in corneal anatomy and quality of vision following LASIK refractive surgery for mild to high myopia using the WaveLight® Refractive Suite (Alcon® Laboratories Inc., USA). Setting. Rothschild Foundation, Paris, France.

Design

Prospective interventional case series.

Methods

We examined 60 myopic eyes (average SE −4.5 D, from −9.3 to −0.75 D) of 30 patients from 21.3 to 38.7 years old. Pachymetry, keratometry, Q factor, corneal aberrations, visual acuity (VA), contrast sensitivity, dry eye assessment, and quality of vision were measured preoperatively, one day (D1), and 1, 3, and 6 months postoperatively.

Results

6 months postoperatively, keratometry became flatter, and the Q factor became more oblate (from −0.18 ± 0.08 to +0.19 ± 0.06). Pachymetry decreased by 117.9 ± 62.2 µm at D1 and increased by 37.87 ± 32.6 µm between D1 and M6. Refraction was emmetropic at D1 and remained stable thereafter. Six months after surgery, VA was slightly but nonsignificantly improved (<0.05 log MAR), whereas contrast sensitivity remained unchanged. Quality of vision was not affected by surgery and was more related to dry eye symptoms than to corneal HOAs (r² = 0.49; p < 0.001 vs. r² = 0.03; p < 0.001).

Conclusions

LASIK surgery for moderate to high myopia, performed with the WaveLight® Refractive Suite, showed good postoperative outcomes, with demonstrated safety, predictability, efficiency, and stability. This is probably due to well-controlled spherical aberration and the use of large optical zones. Besides, we can assume that the patients' quality of vision depends more on the postoperative dry eye disease generated by the laser than on the induced HOAs.

Higher-order aberration measurements: Comparison between Scheimpflug and dual Scheimpflug-Placido technology in normal eyes

PURPOSE

To compare higher order aberrations (HOAs) in normal eyes between a Scheimpflug imaging system (Pentacam HR) and dual Scheimpflug-Placido imaging system (Galilei G4).

SETTING

Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, and the University of Southern California, Los Angeles, USA.

DESIGN

Retrospective case series.

METHODS

Eyes screened for refractive surgery were evaluated sequentially using a Scheimpflug device and a dual Scheimpflug-Placido device. Differences, correlations, and agreement between values for total root mean square (RMS), trefoil, coma, and spherical aberration were analyzed, and Bland-Altman plots were generated.

RESULTS

One hundred five eyes of 105 patients (44 men, 61 women) were evaluated. Total RMS, coma, and trefoil were significantly different between groups (all P < .001), while spherical aberration values were not. There was moderate correlation between devices for trefoil (r = 0.475 to 0.652), coma (r = 0.574 to 0.651), and spherical aberration (r = 0.483) and a strong correlation for total cornea RMS (r = 0.817). There was no directional bias between groups. The 95% limits of agreement for absolute values was 0.039 μm for trefoil at 30 degrees, 0.405 μm for trefoil at 0 degree, 0.553 μm for horizontal coma, 0.545 μm for vertical coma, 0.318 μm for spherical aberration, and 0.617 μm for RMS.

CONCLUSIONS

A Scheimpflug imaging device and dual Scheimpflug-Placido imaging device generated statistically different values for total cornea HOAs; however, the correlation between devices was moderate to strong and there was reasonable agreement in all measures for normal eyes. Based on these findings, the devices appear functionally equivalent for clinical use, although caution is warranted for outcomes-based research protocols that report HOAs.

Measuring mental workload: ocular astigmatism aberration as a novel objective index

This study assessed the effect of two perceptually matched mental tasks with different levels of mental demand on ocular aberrations in a group of young adults. We measured ocular aberration with a wavefront sensor, and total, internal and corneal RMS (root mean square) aberrations were calculated from Zernike coefficients, considering natural and scaled pupils (5, 4.5, and 4 mm). We found that total, internal and corneal astigmatism RMS showed significant differences between mental tasks with natural pupils (p < .05), and this effect was maintained with 5 mm scaled pupils (total RMS astigmatism, p < .05). Consistently, pupil size, intraocular pressure, perceived mental load and cognitive performance were influenced by the level of mental complexity (p < .05 for all). The findings suggest that ocular astigmatism aberration, mediated by intraocular pressure, could be an objective, valid reliable index to evaluate the impact of cognitive processing in conjunction with others physiological markers in real world contexts. Practitioner Summary: The search continues for a valid, reliable, convenient method of measuring mental workload. In this study we found ocular astigmatism aberration is sensitive to the cumulative effect of mental effort. It shows promise of being a novel ocular index which may help to assess mental workload in real situations.

Higher order optical aberrations and visual acuity in a randomized controlled trial comparing transepithelial versus epithelium-off corneal crosslinking for progressive keratoconus

Purpose

The purpose of this study was to compare the effects of transepithelial crosslinking (trans-CXL) versus epithelium-off crosslinking (epi-off CXL) for progressive keratoconus with respect to the development of higher order aberrations (HOAs) and their effects on visual acuity.

Materials and methods

A total of 61 patients were randomized and examined preoperatively and 1, 3, 6, and 12 months postoperatively in an academic referral center. Total corneal HOAs were compared between the two treatment groups using mixed linear modeling. Types of HOAs (coma, trefoil, and spherical aberration) that differed between groups were entered in a multivariable analysis to test their effect on uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA) and corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA).

Results

The epi-off CXL group had more flattening in maximal keratometry compared to the trans-CXL group (P=0.02). UDVA did not differ significantly between the groups (P=0.59); however, CDVA was significantly more improved in the trans-CXL group (P=0.02). Horizontal trefoil improved more in the epi-off group compared to the trans-CXL group (P=0.04), whereas the other HOAs were virtually unchanged in both groups. Differences in changes in HOAs between the two groups had no effect on either UCVA (P=0.76) or CDVA (P=0.96).

Conclusion

Although HOAs are clinically relevant determinants of vision quality in keratoconus patients, the change in total HOAs post treatment did not differ between the trans-CXL and epi-off CXL groups. Only horizontal trefoil differed significantly post treatment between the trans-CXL and epi-off CXL groups. However, this difference did not independently affect either UDVA or CDVA. Trans-CXL provides no benefit over epi-off CXL regarding visual relevant HOAs.

Visual outcomes following Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty for corneal endothelial dysfunction

OBJECTIVE

To assess objective and subjective visual outcomes achieved by patients with corneal endothelial dysfunction who have undergone surgical treatment with Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK).

METHODS

A total of 40 eyes of 36 patients with corneal endothelial dysfunction underwent DSAEK. All were followed up for 1 year. Visual acuity (VA; logMAR), mean endothelial cell density (MCD; via noncontact specular microscopy), and topography assessment were performed at baseline (preoperatively). Visual acuity and topography measurement were repeated at postoperative year 1. Subjective assessment of visual quality was evaluated using the National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire (NEI-VFQ).

RESULTS

Preoperative best-corrected VA (BCVA) was 1.29 ± 0.53 logMAR with mean optical correction of -0.33 ± 1.74 D. Postoperative BCVA, assessed after a mean of 10.8 ± 2.1 months, showed mean line gain of 7.11 ± 4.8 logMAR, with optical correction of +1.17 ± 1.54 D. Mean 6-month postoperative pachymetry was 598.2 ± 72.3 µm. Three patients experienced premature graft detachment, requiring repositioning via injection of a sterile air bubble. No other adverse events were observed. Significant improvement (p<.05 for all) in general, near, and far vision, ocular pain, difficulty in carrying out daily tasks, dependency, social life, and mental health were reflected by NEI-VFQ scores at 10.4 ± 2.1 months postoperatively versus preoperatively. No significant correlation was noted between postoperative VA line gain and NEI-VFQ-25 questionnaire score (p>0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty treatment may restore corneal clarity, improve VA, and increase vision-related quality of life in patients with advanced endothelial dysfunction. Further large-scale study is needed to corroborate these findings.

Corneal Higher Order Aberrations in Granular, Lattice and Macular Corneal Dystrophies

Purpose

To evaluate the corneal higher-order aberrations (HOAs) in granular, lattice and macular corneal dystrophies.

Methods

This retrospective study includes consecutive patients who were diagnosed as granular corneal dystrophy type2 (GCD2; 121 eyes), lattice corneal dystrophies type 1, type 3A (LCDI; 20 eyes, LCDIIIA; 32 eyes) and macular corneal dystrophies (MCD; 13 eyes), and 18 healthy control eyes. Corneal HOAs were calculated using anterior segment optical coherence tomography, and the correlations between HOAs and visual acuity were analyzed.

Results

HOAs of the total cornea within 4 mm diameter were significantly larger in GCD2 (0.17 ± 0.35 μm), in LCDI (0.33 ± 0.27), LCDIIIA (0.61 ± 1.56) and in MCD (0.23 ± 0.18), compared with healthy controls (0.09 ± 0.02μm, all P < 0.01). HOAs of the total cornea within 6 mm diameter were significantly larger in GCD2 (0.32 ± 0.48), in LCDI (0.60 ± 0.46), LCDIIIA (0.83 ± 2.29) and in MCD (0.44 ± 0.24), compared with healthy controls (0.19 ± 0.06, all P < 0.001). In GCD2, there was no significant correlation between logMAR and HOAs (r = 0.113, P = 0.227). In MCD, LCDI and LCDIIIA, logMAR was positively significantly correlated with HOAs (r = 0.620 and P = 0.028, r = 0.587 and P = 0.007, r = 0.614 and P < 0.001, respectively).

Conclusions

Increased HOAs occur in eyes with corneal dystrophies, especially in eye with LCD and MCD. Larger amount corneal HOAs are associated with poorer visual acuity in patients with LCD and MCD.

An Analysis of Factors Influencing Quality of Vision After Big-Bubble Deep Anterior Lamellar Keratoplasty in Keratoconus

PURPOSE

To identify causes of reduced visual acuity and contrast sensitivity after big-bubble deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty (DALK) in keratoconus.

DESIGN

Prospective interventional case series.

METHODS

This study included 36 eyes in 36 patients with keratoconus who underwent DALK using the big-bubble technique. A bare Descemet membrane was achieved in all cases. Univariate analyses and multiple linear regression were used to investigate recipient-, donor-, and postoperative-related variables capable of influencing the postoperative quality of vision, including best spectacle-corrected visual acuity (BSCVA) and contrast sensitivity.

RESULTS

The mean patient age was 27.7 ± 6.9 years, and the patients were followed for 24.6 ± 15.1 months postoperatively. The mean postoperative BSCVA was 0.17 ± 0.09 logMAR. Postoperative BSCVA ≥20/25 was achieved in 14 eyes (38.9%), whereas a BSCVA of 20/30, 20/40, or 20/50 was observed in 15 eyes (41.7%), 6 eyes (16.6%), and 1 eye (2.8%), respectively. Preoperative vitreous length was significantly associated with postoperative BSCVA (β = 0.02, P = .03). Donor-recipient interface reflectivity significantly influenced scotopic (β = -0.002, P = .04) and photopic (β = -0.003, P = .02) contrast sensitivity. The root mean square of tetrafoil was significantly negatively associated with scotopic (β = -0.25, P = .01) and photopic (β = -0.23, P = .04) contrast sensitivity. Recipient age, keratoconus severity, donor-related variables, recipient trephination size, and graft and recipient bed thickness were not significantly associated with postoperative visual acuity or contrast sensitivity.

CONCLUSION

Large vitreous length, higher-order aberrations, and surgical interface haze may contribute to poor visual outcomes after big-bubble DALK in keratoconus.

Wavefront-guided scleral lens correction in keratoconus

PURPOSE

To examine the performance of state-of-the-art wavefront-guided scleral contact lenses (wfgSCLs) on a sample of keratoconic eyes, with emphasis on performance quantified with visual quality metrics, and to provide a detailed discussion of the process used to design, manufacture, and evaluate wfgSCLs.

METHODS

Fourteen eyes of seven subjects with keratoconus were enrolled and a wfgSCL was designed for each eye. High-contrast visual acuity and visual quality metrics were used to assess the on-eye performance of the lenses.

RESULTS

The wfgSCL provided statistically lower levels of both lower-order root mean square (RMS) (p < 0.001) and higher-order RMS (HORMS) (p < 0.02) than an intermediate spherical equivalent scleral contact lens. The wfgSCL provided lower levels of lower-order RMS than a normal group of well-corrected observers (p << 0.001). However, the wfgSCL does not provide less HORMS than the normal group (p = 0.41). Of the 14 eyes studied, 10 successfully reached the exit criteria, achieving residual HORMS wavefront error less than or within 1 SD of the levels experienced by normal, age-matched subjects. In addition, measures of visual image quality (logVSX, logNS, and logLIB) for the 10 eyes were well distributed within the range of values seen in normal eyes. However, visual performance as measured by high-contrast acuity did not reach normal, age-matched levels, which is in agreement with prior results associated with the acute application of wavefront correction to keratoconic eyes.

CONCLUSIONS

Wavefront-guided scleral contact lenses are capable of optically compensating for the deleterious effects of higher-order aberration concomitant with the disease and can provide visual image quality equivalent to that seen in normal eyes. Longer-duration studies are needed to assess whether the visual system of the highly aberrated eye wearing a wfgSCL is capable of producing visual performance levels typical of the normal population.

Wavefront aberration changes caused by a gradient of increasing accommodation stimuli

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to investigate the wavefront aberration changes in human eyes caused by a gradient of increasing accommodation stimuli.

DESIGN

This is a prospective, single-site study.

METHODS

Healthy volunteers (n=22) aged 18-28 years whose refraction states were emmetropia or mild myopia, with astigmatism <1 diopter (D), were included in this study. After dilating the right pupil with 0.5% phenylephrine drops, the wavefront aberration of the right eye was measured continuously either without or with 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, or 6D accommodation stimuli (WFA1000B psychophysical aberrometer). The root mean square (RMS) values of the total wavefront aberrations, higher-order aberrations, and 35 individual Zernike aberrations under different accommodation stimuli were calculated and compared.

RESULTS

The average induced accommodations using 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, or 6D accommodation stimuli were 0.848, 1.626, 2.375, 3.249, 4.181, or 5.085 D, respectively. The RMS of total wavefront aberrations, as well as higher-order aberrations, showed no significant effects with 1-3 D accommodation stimuli, but increased significantly under 4, 5, and 6 D accommodation stimuli compared with relaxed accommodation. Zernike coefficients of significantly decreased with increasing levels of accommodation.

CONCLUSION

Higher-order wavefront aberrations in human eyes changed with increased accommodation. These results are consistent with Schachar's accommodation theory.

Critical band masking reveals the effects of optical distortions on the channel mediating letter identification

There is evidence that letter identification is mediated by only a narrow band of spatial frequencies and that the center frequency of the neural channel thought to underlie this selectivity is related to the size of the letters. When letters are spatially filtered (at a fixed size) the channel tuning characteristics change according to the properties of the spatial filter (Majaj et al., 2002). Optical aberrations in the eye act to spatially filter the image formed on the retina-their effect is generally to attenuate high frequencies more than low frequencies but often in a non-monotonic way. We might expect the change in the spatial frequency spectrum caused by the aberration to predict the shift in channel tuning observed for aberrated letters. We show that this is not the case. We used critical-band masking to estimate channel-tuning in the presence of three types of aberration-defocus, coma and secondary astigmatism. We found that the maximum masking was shifted to lower frequencies in the presence of an aberration and that this result was not simply predicted by the spatial-frequency-dependent degradation in image quality, assessed via metrics that have previously been shown to correlate well with performance loss in the presence of an aberration. We show that if image quality effects are taken into account (using visual Strehl metrics), the neural channel required to model the data is shifted to lower frequencies compared to the control (no-aberration) condition. Additionally, we show that when spurious resolution (caused by π phase shifts in the optical transfer function) in the image is masked, the channel tuning properties for aberrated letters are affected, suggesting that there may be interference between visual channels. Even in the presence of simulated aberrations, whose properties change from trial-to-trial, observers exhibit flexibility in selecting the spatial frequencies that support letter identification.

Accounting for the phase, spatial frequency and orientation demands of the task improves metrics based on the visual Strehl ratio

Advances in ophthalmic instrumentation have allowed high order aberrations to be measured in vivo. These measurements describe the distortions to a plane wavefront entering the eye, but not the effect they have on visual performance. One metric for predicting visual performance from a wavefront measurement uses the visual Strehl ratio, calculated in the optical transfer function (OTF) domain (VSOTF) (Thibos et al., 2004). We considered how well such a metric captures empirical measurements of the effects of defocus, coma and secondary astigmatism on letter identification and on reading. We show that predictions using the visual Strehl ratio can be significantly improved by weighting the OTF by the spatial frequency band that mediates letter identification and further improved by considering the orientation of phase and contrast changes imposed by the aberration. We additionally showed that these altered metrics compare well to a cross-correlation-based metric. We suggest a version of the visual Strehl ratio, VScombined, that incorporates primarily those phase disruptions and contrast changes that have been shown independently to affect object recognition processes. This metric compared well to VSOTF for letter identification and was the best predictor of reading performance, having a higher correlation with the data than either the VSOTF or cross-correlation-based metric.

Postkeratoplasty Anterior and Posterior Corneal Surface Wavefront Analysis: Descemet's Stripping Automated Endothelial Keratoplasty versus Penetrating Keratoplasty

Purpose. To compare the higher-order aberrations (HOAs) due to the anterior and posterior corneal surfaces in patients that underwent either Descemet-stripping-automated-endothelial-keratoplasty (DSAEK) or penetrating keratoplasty (PK) for endothelial dysfunction and age-matched controls. Methods. This retrospective, observational, case series included 28 patients after PK, 30 patients after DSAEK, and 30 healthy controls. A Scheimpflug imaging system was used to assess the HOAs due to the anterior and posterior corneal surfaces at 4 mm and 6 mm optical zones. Total, 3rd and 4th order HOAs were considered. Intra- and intergroup differences were assessed using the Friedman and the Kruskal-Wallis tests, respectively; paired comparisons were performed using Duncan's multiple range test. Results. Total, 3rd and 4th order HOAs due to both corneal surfaces at 4 mm and 6 mm optical zones were significantly higher in the PK group, intermediate in the DSAEK group, and lower in controls (P < 0.05). The most important HOAs components in both PK and DSAEK groups were trefoil and coma from the anterior corneal surface (P < 0.05) and trefoil from the posterior corneal surface (P < 0.05). Conclusions. The optical quality of both corneal surfaces appeared significantly higher after DSAEK than after PK, which can increase the postoperative patient's quality of vision and satisfaction.

Changes in higher-order aberrations after iris-fixated phakic intraocular lens implantation

PURPOSE

To evaluate surgically induced changes in corneal, internal, and ocular higher-order aberrations (HOAs) after phakic intraocular lens (PIOL) implantation and compare them between two PIOLs with different pupillary diameters.

METHODS

Twenty-three eyes with an Artisan PIOL (Ophtec BV, Groningen, The Netherlands) (Artisan group) and 30 eyes with an Artiflex PIOL (Ophtec BV) (Artiflex group) were retrospectively evaluated. The corneal, internal, and ocular HOAs and refractive data were recorded preoperatively and 6 months postoperatively. The root mean squares (RMSs) of the total HOAs from the third- to sixth-order Zernike coefficients were calculated. The RMSs of the third- and fourth-order coefficients represented coma-like aberrations (S3) and spherical-like aberrations (S4), respectively. The main outcome measures were the differences in the parameters among the groups with different pupillary diameters.

RESULTS

The mean postoperative spherical equivalents decreased from -11.84 ± 4.90 to -0.16 ± 0.40 diopters and -9.78 ± 3.20 to -0.09 ± 0.26 diopters in the Artisan and Artiflex groups, respectively. With the 4- and 5-mm pupillary diameters, the postoperative internal and ocular spherical aberrations (Z4(0)) were significantly lower in the Artiflex group than in the Artisan group (4 mm, P = .002, .024; 5 mm, P = .004, .022, respectively). With the 6-mm pupillary diameter, there were no significant postoperative differences in any parameter measured between groups; both groups had positive spherical aberration values.

CONCLUSIONS

The postoperative ocular spherical aberrations were positive after Artisan and Artiflex implantation. The postoperative ocular spherical aberration was greater in the Artisan group, possibly due to differences in the SAs of both PIOLs.

Identifying causes for poor visual outcome after DSEK/DSAEK following secondary DMEK in the same eye

PURPOSE

To identify causes of reduced visual acuity after Descemet stripping (automated) endothelial keratoplasty (DSEK/DSAEK) and to determine whether such eyes can be successfully 'repaired' with a secondary Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK).

METHODS

Twelve eyes of 12 patients, who underwent secondary DMEK to manage poor visual outcome after initial DSEK/DSAEK, were evaluated with biomicroscopy, Pentacam imaging, and specular and confocal microscopy, before and at 1, 3 and 6 months after DMEK.

RESULTS

Four causes of reduced optical quality of the transplanted host cornea could be identified in DSEK/DSAEK: five eyes (42%) showed large host-Descemet remnants within the visual axis during surgery; six eyes (50%) irregular graft thickness; six eyes subtle 'stromal waves'; and nine eyes (75%) high reflectivity at the donor-to-host interface. After DMEK graft replacement, all corneas cleared and achieved a best corrected visual acuity of ≥20/25 (≥0.8), except for one with a partial Descemet graft detachment. Pachymetry values decreased from 670 (±112) μm before to 517 (±57) μm after secondary DMEK. Higher-order aberrations (Coma and Trefoil) at the posterior surface tended to be lower (p = 0.07) in DMEK grafts than in DSEK/DSAEK grafts.

CONCLUSION

Host-Descemet remnants at the donor-to-host interface, interface reflectivity, graft thickness irregularity and donor stromal contraction may contribute to poor visual outcome after DSEK/DSAEK, without causing permanent host corneal damage, as in most cases, complete visual recovery could be achieved by performing a secondary DMEK.

Analysis of four aberrometers for evaluating lower and higher order aberrations

PURPOSE

To compare the measurements of lower and higher order aberrations (HOA) of 4 commonly used aberrometers.

SETTING

Massachusetts Eye & Ear Infirmary, Boston, USA.

DESIGN

Prospective, cross-sectional study, in a controlled, single-blinded fashion.

METHODS

Multiple readings were obtained in 42 eyes of 21 healthy volunteers, at a single visit, with each of the following aberrometers: Alcon LADARWave®, Visx WaveScan®, B & L Zywave®, and Wavelight Allegro Analyzer®. Results were compared and analyzed in regards to the lower and HOA, to the different wavefront sensing devices and software, Tscherning and Hartmann-Shack and between the Fourier and Zernike algorithms. Statistical analysis included Bland-Altman plots, Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC), multiple comparison tests with Analysis of Variance and Kruskal-Wallis. Significant level was set to p<0.05 and alpha level correction was adjusted under the Bonferroni criteria.

RESULTS

Most measurements of all 4 aberrometers were comparable. However, statistically significant differences were found between the aberrometers in total HOA (tHOA), spherical aberration (SA), horizontal coma and astigmatism (2,2). LADARwave and Wavescan showed significant differences in tHOA (P<0.001, ICC = 0.549, LoA = 0.19±0.5) and in SA (P<0.001, ICC = 0.733, LoA = 0.16±0.37). Wavescan showed a significant difference compared to Zywave (p<0.001, ICC = 0.920, LoA = 0.09±0.13) in SA. Comparisons between Allegro Analyzer and Zywave demonstrated significant differences in both Horizontal Coma (3,1) (p<0.001, ICC = -0.207, LoA = -0.15±0.48) and Astigmatism (2,2) (P = 0.003, ICC = -0.965, LoA = 0.2±2.5). Allegro Analyzer also differed from Wavescan in Horizontal Coma (3,1) (P<0.001, ICC = 0.725, LoA = -0.07±0.25).

CONCLUSIONS

Although some measurements were comparable predominately in the lower order aberrations, significant differences were found in the tHOA, SA, horizontal coma and astigmatism. Our analysis suggests that sensor design contributes to agreement in lower order aberrations, and Fourier and Zernike expansion might disagree in higher order aberrations. Therefore, comparison between aberrometers was generally possible with some exceptions in higher order measurements.

Corneal higher-order aberrations after Descemet's membrane endothelial keratoplasty

PURPOSE

We compared corneal higher-order aberrations (HOAs) in eyes after Descemet's membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK), Descemet's stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK), and penetrating keratoplasty (PK), and in a control group that had not undergone surgery.

DESIGN

Retrospective analysis of clinical data.

PARTICIPANTS

Thirty eyes of 30 patients who had undergone standard DMEK, 20 eyes of 20 patients after DSAEK, 20 eyes of 20 patients after PK, and 20 eyes of 20 controls were analyzed.

METHODS

In addition to standard postoperative examinations, each participant was analyzed with the Pentacam high-resolution rotating Scheimpflug imaging system (Pentacam HR, Oculus, Wetzlar, Germany). Data were compared between groups.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Visual acuity and HOAs.

RESULTS

The mean follow-up was 6.5 ± 1.2 months after DMEK, 22.6 ± 11.8 months after DSAEK, and 103.1 ± 74.2 months after PK. There were no statistically significant differences for the anterior 4.0-mm zones between the DMEK group and the controls or between the DMEK and DSAEK groups. The DMEK procedure compared with PK showed statistically significant differences in all terms for the 4.0-mm zones. All combined Zernike terms for mean posterior aberrations of the central 4.0-mm zones showed statistically significant higher aberrations for DMEK compared with controls. The DMEK procedure compared with DSAEK showed statistically significant lower mean values for all combined Zernike terms, except for coma and coma-like terms in the central 4.0-mm zones of the posterior corneal surface. Compared with PK, DMEK showed statistically significant lower mean values for all combined Zernike terms for the central 4.0-mm zones of the posterior corneal surface, except for spherical aberration (SA) and SA-like terms. Best spectacle-corrected visual acuity (BSCVA) after DMEK was statistically significantly better than after DSAEK (P=0.001) and PK (P=0.005). There was no statistically significant difference when BSCVA was compared with controls (P=0.998).

CONCLUSIONS

Both DSAEK and PK exhibit increased posterior corneal HOAs even years after surgery. Patients receiving DMEK display only slight changes in posterior corneal HOAs.

Contrast sensitivity after zyoptix tissue saving LASIK and standard LASIK for myopia with 6-month followup

This control-matched comparative study evaluated changes in contrast sensitivity after Zyoptix tissue-saving (TS) LASIK and Planoscan standard LASIK (Technolas 217z, Bausch & Lomb) for myopia 6 months postoperatively. 102 TS LASIK-treated eyes were matched with 102 standard LASIK-treated eyes (divided into low, moderate, and high groups). There were no significant differences in refraction outcomes between the groups postoperatively. In high group, a significant reduction in contrast sensitivity after TS LASIK was found at high spatial frequencies (P < .05) under photopic conditions and at middle to high spatial frequencies (P < .05) under mesopic conditions. And significant reduction was also found in standard LASIK at high spatial frequency (P < .05) under mesopic conditions. The reduction was significantly lower in TS LASIK than that in standard LASIK at high spatial frequencies (P < .05) under mesopic conditions. TS LASIK was prone to reduce mesopic contrast sensitivity of high myopia at high spatial frequencies.

Why preoperative acuity predicts postoperative acuity in wavefront-guided LASIK

PURPOSE

To critically evaluate the following clinical wisdom regarding custom (wavefront-guided) laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) that subjects with better-than-average best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) before surgery have a greater risk of losing BCVA postoperatively than do subjects with worse-than-average BCVA before surgery.

METHODS

High contrast BCVA was measured once before and 3 months after custom LASIK in one eye of 79 subjects. Preoperative spherical equivalent refractive error ranged between -1.00 and -10.38 D. The sample was divided into one of two subsamples: eyes that had better-than-average preoperative BCVA (<-0.11 logMAR) and eyes that had average or worse-than-average preoperative BCVA (≥-0.11 logMAR). Controls were implemented for retinal magnification and for the statistical phenomenon of regression to the mean of the preoperative acuity measurement.

RESULTS

On average, for the entire sample, moving the correction from the spectacle plane to the corneal plane increased letter acuity 4.7% (1 letter, 0.02 logMAR). For each subsample, the percentage regression to the mean was 57.24%. After correcting for magnification effects and regression to the mean, eyes with better-than-average preoperative acuity had a small but significant gain in acuity (∼1 letter, p = 0.040) that was nearly identical to the gain for eyes with worse-than-average preoperative acuity (∼1.5 letters, p = 0.002).

CONCLUSIONS

Custom LASIK produced a statistically significant gain in visual acuity after correction for magnification effects. Dividing the sample into two subsamples based on preoperative acuity confirmed the common clinical observation that eyes with better-than-average acuity tend to remain the same or lose acuity, whereas eyes with worse-than-average acuity tend to gain acuity. However, when only one acuity measurement is taken at a single time point and the sample is subsampled nonrandomly, this clinical observation is due to a statistical artifact (regression to the mean) and is not attributable to the surgery.

Optical aberrations in professional baseball players

PURPOSE

To determine the presence, type, and size of optical higher-order aberrations (HOAs) in professional athletes with superior visual acuity and to compare them with those in an age-matched population of nonathletes.

SETTING

Vero Beach and Fort Myers, Florida, USA.

METHODS

Players from 2 professional baseball teams were studied. Each player's optical aberrations were measured with a naturally dilated 4.0 mm pupil using a Z-Wave aberrometer and a LADARWave aberrometer.

RESULTS

One hundred sixty-two players (316 eyes) were evaluated. The HOAs were less than 0.026 mum in all cases. Spherical aberration C(4,0) was the largest aberration with both aberrometers. There were small but statistically significant differences between the aberrometers in mean values for trefoil C(3,3) and C(3,-3) and secondary astigmatism C(4,2). Although statistically significant, the differences were clinically insignificant, being similar at approximately 0.031 diopter (D) of spherical power. A statistically significant difference was found between the professional baseball players and the control population in trefoil C(3,-3). These differences were clinically insignificant, similar to 0.071 D of spherical power.

CONCLUSIONS

Professional baseball players have small higher-order optical aberrations when tested with naturally dilated pupils. No clinically significant differences were found between the 2 aberrometers. Statistically significant differences in trefoil were found between the players and the control population; however, the difference was clinically insignificant. It seems as though the visual system of professional baseball players is limited by lower-order aberrations and that the smaller HOAs do not enhance visual function over that in a control population.

Non-contact measurement of linear external dimensions of the mouse eye

Biometric analyses of quantitative traits in eyes of mice can reveal abnormalities related to refractive or ocular development. Due to the small size of the mouse eye, highly accurate and precise measurements are needed to detect meaningful differences. We sought a non-contact measuring technique to obtain highly accurate and precise linear dimensions of the mouse eye. Laser micrometry was validated with gauge block standards. Simple procedures to measure eye dimensions on three axes were devised. Mouse eyes from C57BL/6J and rd10 on a C57BL/6J background were dissected and extraocular muscle and fat removed. External eye dimensions of axial length (anterior-posterior (A-P) axis) and equatorial diameter (superior-inferior (S-I) and nasal-temporal (N-T) axes) were obtained with a laser micrometer. Several approaches to prevent or ameliorate evaporation due to room air were employed. The resolution of the laser micrometer was less than 0.77 microm, and it provided accurate and precise non-contact measurements of eye dimensions on three axes. External dimensions of the eye strongly correlated with eye weight. The N-T and S-I dimensions of the eye correlated with each other most closely from among the 28 pair-wise combinations of the several parameters that were collected. The equatorial axis measurements correlated well from the right and left eye of each mouse. The A-P measurements did not correlate or correlated poorly in each pair of eyes. The instrument is well suited for the measurement of enucleated eyes and other structures from most commonly used species in experimental vision research and ophthalmology.

Correlation of aberrometry, contrast sensitivity, and subjective symptoms with quality of vision after LASIK

PURPOSE

To compare which parameter category (wavefront data, psychophysical data, or subjective symptoms) predicts best subjective quality of vision after LASIK.

METHODS

Twenty-eight eyes (15 patients) were included. Twenty-three eyes (12 patients) underwent uneventful LASIK; 5 eyes (3 patients) were symptomatic eyes treated with myopic LASIK elsewhere. Mean preoperative spherical equivalent refraction was -4.79+/-1.92 diopters (D) (range: -1.63 to -7.13 D); mean patient age was 36.6+/-7.4 years (range: 18 to 48 years). All examinations were performed 1 month postoperatively. The wavefront error was described with Zernike polynomials (6-mm pupil). Psychophysical tests included high-contrast visual acuity and contrast sensitivity with and without glare at 167 cd/m(-2), 1.67 cd/m(-2), and 0.167 cd/m(-2) with best spectacle correction. Correspondingly, overall subjective quality of vision and frequency of visual symptoms (glare, halos, starbursts, ghosting, blur) were assessed for three lighting conditions (photopic, high-mesopic, and low-mesopic) using a questionnaire with a visual analog scale. For each parameter category and each lighting condition, a multiple stepwise backwards regression model with the overall quality of vision item value as dependent was applied.

RESULTS

Under all lighting conditions, subjective symptom scores predicted subjective quality of vision best (adjusted R2=0.83-0.92) with blur as the main predictor throughout all conditions. Psychophysical tests did not significantly predict postoperative subjective quality of vision. The adjusted R2 for the Zernike coefficients was highest for low-mesopic (0.56) and lowest for photopic conditions (0.31).

CONCLUSIONS

Different parameter categories for the description of optical quality did not predict subjective quality of vision after LASIK equally. Subjective symptom scores had the highest predictability, whereas psychophysical tests with spectacle correction had no predictability. The latter probably do not reflect all dimensions of subjective quality of vision.

Performance of wavefront-guided soft lenses in three keratoconus subjects

PURPOSE

To examine whether custom wavefront-guided soft contact lenses provide visual and optical performance equivalent to habitual gas permeable (GP) corrections in three keratoconus subjects.

METHODS

Custom wavefront-guided soft contact lenses were produced and evaluated at the Visual Optics Institute, College of Optometry, University of Houston for three habitual GP-wearing keratoconus subjects. Photopic high and mesopic low contrast logarithm of minimum angle of resolution visual acuity (logMAR VA) and residual second to tenth order optical aberrations experienced with these custom soft lenses were recorded and compared with the subjects' habitual GP correction.

RESULTS

All three subjects wearing custom soft lenses reached the established exit criterion of photopic high contrast (HC) logMAR VA equal to or better than values recorded with their habitual GP lens. HC logMAR VA for GP and custom soft lens correction was 0.01 +/- 0.05 and 0.00 +/- 0.02 for KC1, 0.20 +/- 0.02 and 0.14 +/- 0.02 for KC2, and 0.04 +/- 0.09 and -0.05 +/- 0.05 for KC3, respectively. In addition, KC2 reached the exit criterion of high-order aberration levels equal to or less than values with their habitual GP lens (GP lens: 0.394 +/- 0.024 microm, custom lens: 0.381 +/- 0.074 microm).

CONCLUSIONS

Custom wavefront-guided soft contact lenses have been demonstrated to provide equivalent photopic HC logMAR VA to that achieved with habitual GP correction in three keratoconus subjects. Future emphasis will be placed on surpassing habitual GP performance and reaching a normal age-matched criterion for both VA and aberration measures. Achieving these goals may require a more thorough understanding of the relationship between visual performance and residual aberration experienced during custom lens wear through the use of image quality metrics predictive of visual performance.

Binocular correlation of ocular aberration dynamics

Fluctuations in accommodation have been shown to be correlated in the two eyes of the same subject. However, the dynamic correlation of higher-order aberrations in the frequency domain has not been studied previously. A binocular Shack-Hartmann wavefront sensor is used to measure the ocular wavefront aberrations concurrently in both eyes of six subjects at a sampling rate of 20.5 Hz. Coherence function analysis shows that the inter-ocular correlation between aberrations depends on subject, Zernike mode and frequency. For each subject, the coherence values are generally low across the resolvable frequency range (mean 0.11), indicating poor dynamic correlation between the aberrations of the two eyes. Further analysis showed that phase consistency dominates the coherence values. Monocular and binocular viewing conditions showed similar power spectral density functions.

[Application of wavefront analysis in clinical and scientific settings. From irregular astigmatism to aberrations of a higher order--Part II: examples]

In recent years, wavefront analysis has ceased to be purely a laboratory application and emerged as a method used in ophthalmological diagnosis. This development has been promoted mainly by the widespread use of wavefront-guided LASIK (laser in situ keratomileusis). However, aberrometry is still not a common diagnostic technique, and for many ophthalmologists interpretation of the results is difficult. The second part of this serial paper reviews findings that are relevant for the ophthalmological community and highlights current scientific applications in this area.

Evaluation of Deep Lamellar Endothelial Keratoplasty Surgery Using Scatterometry and Wavefront Analyses

OBJECTIVE

To determine if postsurgical corneal interface abnormalities after deep lamellar endothelial keratoplasty (DLEK) cause increased light scattering or wavefront aberrations that may help to explain decreased best-corrected visual acuity in DLEK patients compared with penetrating keratoplasty (PK) patients.

DESIGN

Prospective comparative case series.

PARTICIPANTS

Clinically clear corneas of 4 eyes that had undergone DLEK surgery and 4 eyes that had PK were studied. Normal control data for light scattering was collected from 12 right eyes and 11 left eyes with normal corneas.

METHODS

Corneal light scattering was measured with a scatterometer designed at the Johns Hopkins Applied Physics Laboratory, and wavefront analysis was performed using standard methods with a Hartmann-Shack wavefront sensor.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Corneal scattering measurements were normalized by taking the ratio of the subject's corneal light scattering to a reference material. A scattering index was calculated as the ratio of the normalized scattering for a given patient's cornea to the average scattering of normal corneas. Astigmatism and higher-order aberrations were analyzed using standard data output from wavefront analysis and Zernike polynomial decomposition.

RESULTS

The mean scattering index was significantly higher after DLEK (1.78+/-0.29, mean+/-standard deviation [SD]) than after PK (1.03+/-0.27; P = 0.043). The higher-order root mean square (RMS) wavefront error was significantly higher after PK (0.71+/-0.11 microm, mean+/-SD) than after DLEK (0.44+/-0.12 microm; P = 0.029). Zernike polynomial decomposition of the wavefront aberrations revealed that regular corneal astigmatism was the most important aberration component for both PK and DLEK, but the PK patients had significantly more regular astigmatism (1.7+/-0.45 diopters [D], mean+/-SD) than did the DLEK patients (0.84+/-0.27 D; P = 0.029).

CONCLUSIONS

Our data quantitatively support subclinical corneal haze as an explanation for the limited visual acuity after DLEK as compared with PK. Intraoperative or postoperative modifications to reduce stromal haze after DLEK may result in better visual acuity outcomes.

The Precision of Wavefront Refraction Compared to Subjective Refraction and Autorefraction

PURPOSE

To determine the precision (repeatability) of several methods of calculating refraction from higher-order wavefront aberration data and to compare these wavefront refractions with lower-order (LO) wavefront refraction, subjective refraction, and autorefraction.

METHODS

Four clinicians refracted 16 normal participants aged 23.6 +/- 1.2 years, 69% female with an average spherical equivalent refractive error of -3.03 +/- 2.55 D, median sphere -2.50 D (minimum -7.50, maximum +4.75), and median cylinder -0.50 D (minimum -3.00, maximum 0). Participants were cyclopleged and underwent subjective refraction, autorefraction on two machines (Nidek AR-800, Topcon KR-8000), and wavefront sensing using the Wavefront Sciences Complete Ophthalmic Analysis System. Wavefront error was used to calculate: LO refraction, refractions that incorporated higher-order spherical and astigmatism terms from up to the 4th, 6th, and 10th orders (PCM4, PCM6, and PCM10), and a method based on optimizing image quality metrics [wavefront analysis technology (WAT) refraction]. Within and between examiner agreements for total dioptric difference were determined using Bland-Altman limits of agreement (LOA).

RESULTS

The interexaminer LOA for individual measurements for M, J0, J45 were: Topcon (+/-0.18, +/-0.10, +/-0.06), Nidek (+/-0.28, +/-0.16, +/-0.09), LO (+/-0.17, +/-0.10, +/-0.06), PCM4 (+/-0.26, +/-0.09, +/-0.06), PCM6 (+/-0.37, +/-0.17, +/-0.34), PCM10 (+/-0.54, +/-0.32, +/-0.40), WAT (+/-0.28, +/-0.20, +/-0.15), and subjective refraction (+/-0.48, +/-0.20, +/-0.13) and averaging across three measures LOA: Topcon (+/-0.15, +/-0.08, +/-0.05), Nidek (+/-0.21, +/-0.13, +/-0.07), LO (+/-0.12, +/-0.06, +/-0.04), PCM4 (+/-0.16, +/-0.05, +/-0.04), PCM6 (+/-0.23, +/-0.09, +/-0.19), PCM10 (+/-0.29, +/-0.19, +/-0.24), and WAT (+/-0.18, +/-0.12, +/-0.10). The within-examiner LOA for M, J0, J45 were: Topcon (+/-0.08, +/-0.04, +/-0.02), Nidek (+/-0.13, +/-0.07, +/-0.05 D), LO (+/-0.11, +/-0.07, +/-0.04), PCM4 (+/-0.17, +/-0.07, +/-0.04 D), PCM6 (+/-0.28, +/-0.12, +/-0.24 D), PCM10 (+/-0.42, +/-0.24, +/-0.32 D), and WAT (+/-0.19, +/-0.14, +/-0.09 D).

CONCLUSIONS

All objective refractions except for PCM10 were more repeatable across clinicians than subjective refraction. The precision of all refractions were improved by an expected amount through averaging over multiple measurements. Wavefront refractions were not as precise as standard autorefractions, although not clinically significantly worse.