Changes in corneal hysteresis after clear corneal cataract surgery

Usefulness of Intraocular Pressure With the Ocular Response Analyzer to Predict Postoperative Hypotony Complications in Glaucoma

Purpose

To investigate the usefulness of intraocular pressure (IOP) using the ocular response analyzer to predict the occurrence of hypotony complications following trabeculectomy or bleb needling revision with mitomycin C.

Methods

This study included 66 eyes of 66 patients who underwent trabeculectomy (58 eyes of 58 patients) or bleb needling (8 eyes of 8 patients) with mitomycin C. A significant predictor of hypotony complications was identified from (1) operation (trabeculectomy or bleb needling), (2) age, (3) sex, (4) disease type (primary open-angle glaucoma, primary angle closure glaucoma, or exfoliation glaucoma), (5) lens status (phakia or pseudophakia), (6) preoperative Goldmann applanation tonometry IOP, (7) preoperative central corneal thickness, (8) preoperative axial length, (9) preoperative anterior chamber depth, (10) preoperative corneal hysteresis, (11) preoperative corneal resistance factor, (12) preoperative corneal compensated IOP (IOPcc), and (13) minimum IOP (IOP value when hypotony complications occurred, otherwise the minimum IOP during 3 months from trabeculectomy or bleb needling) using multivariate logistic regression.

Results

The probability of the occurrence of hypotony complications tended to increase by applying higher cutoff values to preoperative Goldmann applanation tonometry IOP and IOPcc, but not lower cutoff values to the minimum IOP. Multivariate logistic regression suggested that higher preoperative IOPcc and pseudophakia were significant predictors of the occurrence of hypotony complications (P = 0.0062 and 0.0069, respectively).

Conclusions

Higher preoperative IOPcc and pseudophakia were significant predictors of the occurrence of hypotony complications.

Translational Relevance

It is useful to measure IOP using the ocular response analyzer before trabeculectomy.

Corneal biomechanics and their association with severity of lens dislocation in Marfan syndrome

PURPOSE

To investigate corneal biomechanical properties and its associations with the severity of lens dislocation in patients with Marfan syndrome.

METHODS

A total of 30 patients with Marfan syndrome and 30 age-, sex- and axial length (AL)-matched controls were recruited. Corneal biomechanical parameters of both groups were measured by CorVis ST and were compared between groups. Potential associations between corneal biomechanical parameters and severity of lens dislocation were also investigated.

RESULTS

Lower applanation 1 velocity (A1V) (0.13 ± 0.004 vs. 0.15 ± 0.003, P = 0.016), shorter applanation 2 time (A2T)(22.64 ± 0.11 vs. 22.94 ± 0.11, P = 0.013), longer peak distance (PD) (5.03 ± 0.07 vs. 4.81 ± 0.05, P = 0.008), longer radius (R) of highest concavity (7.44 ± 0.16 vs. 6.93 ± 0.14, P = 0.012), greater Ambrosio relational thickness horizontal (ARTh) (603 ± 20 vs. 498 ± 12, P < 0.001), and integrated radius (IR) (8.32 ± 0.25 vs. 8.95 ± 0.21, P = 0.033) were detected among Marfan eyes compared with controls (all P < 0.05). Marfan individuals with more severe lens dislocation tended to have increased stiffness parameter as longer A1T, slower A1V, shorter A2T, slower application 2 velocity (A2V), smaller PD and smaller Distance Amplitude (DA) (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Marfan patients were detected to have increased corneal stiffness compared with normal subjects. Corneal biomechanical parameters were significantly associated with the severity of lens dislocation in Marfan patients.

Influence of corneal biomechanical properties on intraocular pressure measurement in different types of Graves’ orbitopathy

BACKGROUND/AIMS

To compare the ocular biomechanical properties of inactive Grave's orbitopathy (GO) patients and healthy subjects and to evaluate the influence of severity and phenotype of GO on these parameters.

METHODS

This was a cross-sectional study. All included inactive GO patients and healthy controls underwent complete ocular examination, including Goldman applanation tonometry (GAT), corneal biomechanical analysis using Ocular Response Analyser (ORA), and corneal epithelial thickness analysis using Optovue. Patients with inactive GO were classified based on the severity and orbital phenotype (predominantly myogenic or lipogenic). Comparison among groups was performed.

RESULTS

60 eyes from 30 inactive GO patients and 30 healthy eyes were examined. Corneal hysteresis (CH) was significantly lower in inactive GO patients (9.6 [p25 8.1; p75 11.2]) compared to controls (10.4 [9.8; 11.5]) (p = 0.012). In GO patients, cornea compensated intraocular pressure (IOPcc) was significantly higher than Goldman applanation tonometry IOP (IOP-GAT) (p = 0.001). A total of 13.3% GO patients were initially classified as having ocular hypertension (OHT; defined as IOP > 21 mmHg with no signs of glaucomatous optic neuropathy) based on IOP-GAT measurement. According to IOPcc, 27.8% of GO patients were classified as OHT. In GO patients, no differences were found in corneal bimechanical properties according to the disease severity or orbital phenotype.

CONCLUSIONS

CH is significantly lower in inactive GO patients compared to healthy subjects. ORA corrected IOP was significantly higher in GO patients compared to IOP-GAT. No differences in corneal biomechanical properties between mild and moderate-to-severe GO disease and between myogenic and lipogenic orbitopathy were found.

Evaluation of corneal hysteresis after pars plana vitrectomy combined phacoemulsification and intraocular lens implantation

We evaluated the early effects of pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) on corneal biomechanics by comparing corneal hysteresis (CH) after cataract surgery (phacoemulsification and aspiration with intraocular lens implantation; PEA + IOL) alone and PPV combined with cataract surgery. This study included 20 eyes (18 patients), who underwent cataract surgery alone (PEA + IOL group), and 28 eyes (27 patients) who underwent PPV combined with cataract surgery (PPV triple group). The CH was 11.1 ± 1.1, 10.4 ± 1.1, and 11.0 ± 1.0 mmHg in the PEA + IOL group and 11.0 ± 1.4, 9.8 ± 1.4, and 10.6 ± 1.6 mmHg in the PPV triple group, preoperatively, at 2 weeks, and 3 months after surgery, respectively. The CH was not significantly different after surgery in the PEA + IOL group, but decreased significantly in the PPV triple group 2 weeks following surgery (p < 0.01). Intraocular pressure (IOP) and central corneal thickness (CCT) did not change significantly after surgery in either group. Preoperatively, there was a positive correlation between CH and CCT in the PPV triple group, but the correlation disappeared postoperatively. In PPV combined with cataract surgery, CH temporarily decreased postoperatively, independent of IOP and CCT. Removal of the vitreous may reduce the elasticity and rigidity of the entire eye.

Repeatability of Corneal Hysteresis Measurements in Glaucoma Patients During Routine Follow Up and After Cataract Surgery

PRCIS

Corneal hysteresis (CH) measurements are relatively stable during routine follow up of glaucoma patients over an intermediate time frame. Cataract surgery does not change the CH significantly after an average follow up of 6 months.

PURPOSE

The aim was to assess the repeatability of CH measurements in glaucoma patients over time, during routine follow up and after cataract surgery.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Retrospective analysis of patients records in a glaucoma clinic where routine measurements by the Ocular Response Analyzer were done. Patients with at least 2 CH measurements were included. Repeatability was assessed using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC).

RESULTS

A total of 164 eyes (87 patients) were included. Twenty-eight of them had measurements before and after cataract surgery with mean follow up time of 29.64±9.63 weeks. There was no evidence for a difference in CH between the before and after cataract surgery measurements (ICC=0.79, 95% confidence interval: 0.60-0.89). In the remaining 136 eyes, without any surgical treatment between measurements, there was moderate agreement among the repeated CH measurements (ICC=0.64, 95% confidence interval: 0.61-0.82) with mean time of 32.06±25.32 weeks between first and last measurement.

CONCLUSION

CH measurements in glaucoma patients were repeatable over a 6-month period during routine follow up or following cataract surgery. These findings suggest that the intraocular pressure reduction following cataract surgery is unlikely to be because of a change in this biomechanical property.

Corneal biomechanical changes after Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty, penetrating keratoplasty, and phacoemulsification

PURPOSE

To evaluate corneal biomechanical changes after Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK), penetrating keratoplasty (PK), and phacoemulsification (PE).

METHODS

This prospective study included 138 eyes which underwent PK (26 eyes), DSAEK (26 eyes), PE (57 eyes), and 29 normal eyes. Intraocular pressure (IOP) was measured by Goldmann applanation tonometer (GAT), and central corneal thickness (CCT) and axial length by ultrasound. The ocular response analyzer was used to measure corneal hysteresis (CH), corneal resistance factor (CRF), Goldmann-related IOP (IOPg), and cornea-compensated IOP (IOPcc) preoperatively and 1, 3, and 6 months postoperatively.

RESULTS

At baseline, PK group had the lowest CH and CRF. There was a significant increase in CH and CRF to normal values in PK (P = 0.015 and 0.006) and PE (P = 0.005 and 0.0001) groups over the study period. At 6 months, CH and CRF increased and reached normal values in the PK group; increased to a lower level than normal in the DSAEK group; and, after an initial reduction, increased to normal values in the PE group. At 6 months, DSAEK group had the lowest CH and CRF. There was a significant positive correlation between CRF and GAT (r = 0.281, P = 0.009), IOPg and GAT (r = 0.335, P = 0.001), and IOPcc and GAT (r = 0.282, P = 0.001). CH was negatively correlated with age (r = - 0.189, P = 0.04).

CONCLUSION

Corneal biomechanical factors increase after DSAEK and PK. At post-operative month six, they reach normal values in PK group, but are lower than normal in DSAEK group.

Corneal hysteresis: ready for prime time?

PURPOSE OF THE REVIEW

This review summarizes recent findings on corneal hysteresis, a biomechanical property of the cornea. Corneal hysteresis measurements can be easily acquired clinically and may serve as surrogate markers for biomechanical properties of tissues in the back of the eye, like the lamina cribrosa and peripapillary sclera, which may be related to the susceptibility to glaucomatous damage.

RECENT FINDINGS

Several studies have provided evidence of the associations between corneal hysteresis and clinically relevant outcomes in glaucoma. Corneal hysteresis has been shown to be predictive of glaucoma development in eyes suspected of having the disease. For eyes already diagnosed with glaucoma, lower corneal hysteresis has been associated with higher risk of progression and faster rates of visual field loss over time. Such associations appear to be stronger than those for corneal thickness, suggesting that corneal hysteresis may be a more important predictive factor. Recent evidence has also shown that cornealcorrected intraocular pressure measurements may present advantages compared to conventional Goldmann tonometry in predicting clinically relevant outcomes in glaucoma.

SUMMARY

Given the evidence supporting corneal hysteresis as an important risk factor for glaucoma development and its progression, practitioners should consider measuring corneal hysteresis in all patients at risk for glaucoma, as well as in those already diagnosed with the disease.

Modification of Corneal Biomechanics and Intraocular Pressure Following Non-Penetrating Deep Sclerectomy

Changes in the cornea can influence outcomes in patients with primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG). We aimed to evaluate the relevance of changes in corneal biomechanics and intraocular pressure (IOP) in patients undergoing non-penetrating deep sclerectomy (NPDS) with the Esnoper V2000 implant^® (AJL Ophthalmic S.A., Gasteiz, Spain). We included 42 eyes of 42 patients with POAG scheduled for NPDS with the Esnoper V2000 implant. Biomechanical properties were measured by Ocular Response Analyzer^® G3 (ORA; Reichert Inc., Depew, NY, USA). Corneal hysteresis (CH), corneal resistance factor (CRF), corneal compensated IOP (IOPcc), and Goldmann-correlated IOP (IOPg) were measured the day before surgery and on day 1, 7, and 30 and 2 and 3 months after surgery. CH initially increased, fell below the presurgical value at 30 days after the surgery, and increased again at 2 and 3 months. CRF, IOPcc, and IOPg decreased on the first day after surgery, then followed a trend of increasing but stayed below pre-surgery levels. All values reached statistical significance. While observed changes in corneal biomechanics after NPDS and Esnoper V2000 implant were significant, more studies are needed if we are to understand their influence on corneal biomechanics and their clinical relevance in POAG.

The Effects of Anti-glaucoma Eyedrops on Corneal Hysteresis in Patients with Open-angle Glaucoma and Glaucoma-suspect

Purpose: We explored the effects of topical anti-glaucoma medications on the corneal biochemical properties of patients with open-angle glaucoma (OAG) and glaucoma suspect (GS patients).Methods: We retrospectively reviewed data on 115 OAG and 98 GS patients (225 and 128 eyes respectively). Corneal hysteresis (CH) was measured using an ocular response analyzer. Factors influencing CH were determined using a generalized estimation equation.Results: The mean CH was lower in OAG than GS patients (p < 0.001). A lower cornea-compensated intraocular pressure, concomitant use of a beta-adrenergic blocker and an alpha2-adrenergic agonist, a higher visual field mean deviation, and a larger central corneal thickness were associated with a higher CH in the OAG group.Conclusions: Concomitant use of a topical beta-adrenergic blocker and an alpha2-adrenergic agonist was associated with a higher CH.

Variations of Intraocular Pressure Measured by Goldmann Applanation Tonometer, Tono-Pen, iCare Rebound Tonometer, and Pascal Dynamic Contour Tonometer in Patients With Corneal Edema After Phacoemulsification

PRCIS

Edematous corneas had lower Goldmann applanation tonometer (GAT) intraocular pressure (IOP) compared with other tonometers. A significant, mild negative correlation between central corneal thickness (CCT) and GAT IOP was found in a group of significant edematous corneas with CCT increases of >100 µm.

PURPOSE

To compare the IOP that was randomly obtained with the GAT, Tono-Pen, iCare, and Pascal dynamic contour tonometer in patients with corneal edema after phacoemulsification.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Corneal edema was quantified by CCT measurement. The agreement between IOP measurements assessed by different instruments was evaluated using Bland-Altman plots. The relationship between CCT and IOP was investigated using the coefficient of correlation. The CCT and IOP were compared between the periods of postsurgical edema and after its resolution.

RESULTS

The mean age of 60 patients was 75.9±7.8 years. CCT increased significantly after surgery, by an average of 96.1±39.9 µm (P<0.001). Relative to the IOPs measured with the GAT in edematous eyes: the mean difference in Tono-Pen IOPs was 4.7 mm Hg; 95% limits of agreement (LOA), -0.3 to 9.6 mm Hg. For iCare, was 2.3 mm Hg; 95% LOA, -2.2 to 6.8 mm Hg. For Pascal dynamic contour tonometer, was 3.0 mm Hg; 95% LOA, -0.4 to 6.5 mm Hg. Edematous corneas had significantly lower GAT IOP than Tono-Pen IOP; 12.3±3.2 versus 16.9±3.1 (P=0.02). Pearson correlation coefficients (r) showed a high correlation between the 4 tonometers in eyes without edema. There was a significant, mild negative correlation between CCT and GAT IOP (r=-0.25, P=0.02) in a group of significant edematous corneas with CCT increases of >100 µm: GAT IOP decreased by 3.1 mm Hg for every 10-µm increase in CCT.

CONCLUSIONS

IOP readings with GAT tended to be lower than those obtained with the other tonometers, especially the Tono-Pen. GAT IOP readings in cases of severe corneal edema should be interpreted with caution.

Accuracy of dynamic contour tonometry, Goldmann applanation tonometry, and Tono-Pen XL in edematous corneas

Purpose:

To investigate in vitro the accuracy of dynamic contour tonometry, Goldmann applanation tonometry, and Tono-Pen XL in edematous corneas.

Methods:

Experimental study included 20 freshly enucleated porcine eyes. Epithelium was debrided, and eyes were divided in four groups. Groups were immersed in 35%, 40%, 50%, and 60% glycerin solutions for 3 hours. Subsequently, globes were mounted in a special holder, and their intraocular pressure was hydrostatically adjusted. Intraocular pressure was measured by means of dynamic contour tonometry, Goldmann applanation tonometry, and Tono-Pen XL while adjusting true intraocular pressure to 17, 33, and 50 mm Hg. Ultrasound pachymetry was performed.

Results:

Mean corneal thickness was 914.5 ± 33.3 μm (730–1015 μm). In true intraocular pressure of 33 mm Hg, Goldmann applanation tonometry and dynamic contour tonometry significantly underestimated true intraocular pressure (mean Goldmann applanation tonometry: 14.7 ± 4.8 mm Hg, p < 0.001, mean dynamic contour tonometry: 21.6 ± 6.8, p < 0.001). Tono-Pen XL also underestimated, but difference was not statistically significant (Tono-Pen XL: 27.9 ± 9.7, p = 0.064). In true intraocular pressure of 50 mm Hg, all three methods significantly underestimated (Goldmann applanation tonometry: 17.6 ± 5.3 mm Hg, p < 0.001, dynamic contour tonometry: 26.8 ± 6.3 mm Hg, p < 0.001, Tono-Pen XL: 35.6 ± 8.4 mm Hg, p < 0.001). The error in measured intraocular pressure for each method (true minus measured intraocular pressure) was significantly correlated to true intraocular pressure (p < 0.001). The intraocular pressure measurements of each eye taken under true intraocular pressure of 17 and 33 mm Hg with the three methods were correlated to each other. Measurements taken under intraocular pressure of 50 mmHg were not correlated to each other. Corneal thickness was not correlated to intraocular pressure measurement.

Conclusion:

Goldmann applanation tonometry, dynamic contour tonometry, and Tono-Pen XL underestimate intraocular pressure when measured under edematous conditions. Tono-Pen XL showed better accuracy, especially in lower true intraocular pressure. The measurement error increases when true intraocular pressure increases in all three methods.

Corneal Biomechanical Changes After Uneventful Phacoemulsification in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus and Patients Without Diabetes

PURPOSE

To compare corneal biomechanical changes after uneventful phacoemulsification cataract surgery between type 2 diabetic (DM) and nondiabetic patients.

METHODS

Forty-four diabetic (44 eyes) and 44 (44 eyes) age and sex-matched non-DM controls with age-related cataract were enrolled in this prospective observational study. Corneal hysteresis (CH), corneal resistance factor (CRF), and corneal-compensated intraocular pressure (IOPcc) were evaluated by using the ocular response analyzer; central corneal thickness was recorded by using the Pentacam HR. Patients were evaluated preoperatively and 1 and 6 months after surgery.

RESULTS

In the DM group, CH was observed to be significantly lower than preoperative value (9.8 ± 1.5 mm Hg) at 1 month (9.4 ± 1.2 mm Hg, P = 0.040), but not at the 6-month follow-up (9.6 ± 1.6 mm Hg, P = 0.437),whereas it did not change significantly in the non-DM group (preoperative 9.8 ± 1.3 mm Hg vs. 1 month 9.6 ± 1.1 mm Hg vs. 6 months 10.1 ± 1.1 mm Hg, P > 0.05). CRF was significantly lower than the preoperative values at 1 and 6 months in both groups (P ≤ 0.001). Postoperative CH change was significantly associated with preoperative CH (P < 0.001), preoperative IOPcc (P = 0.004), and IOPcc change (P < 0.001), whereas CRF change was only correlated with preoperative CRF (P < 0.001). There was a significant postoperative IOPcc reduction 6 months after surgery (P < 0.001) in both DM and non-DM groups; however, central corneal thickness was not found to significantly change in the postoperative period (P > 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

This study showed that phacoemulsification causes a significant and persistent decrease in intraocular pressure and CRF in both groups, whereas CH recovered to preoperative values, although more slowly in patients with diabetes.

Corneal Biomechanical Properties in Childhood Obesity

PURPOSE

To investigate corneal biomechanical properties in patients with childhood obesity.

METHODS

The study included 47 patients with childhood obesity (study group) and 39 healthy patients (control group). Corneal hysteresis, corneal resistance factor, corneal compensated intraocular pressure (IOPcc), and Goldmann-correlated IOP (IOPg) were measured with the Ocular Response Analyzer (Reichert, Ophthalmic Instruments, Buffalo, NY) in each eye. Central corneal thickness (CCT), anterior chamber angle (ACA), anterior chamber volume (ACV), and anterior chamber depth (ACD) measurements were obtained by the Pentacam rotating Scheimpflug camera (Oculus Optikgeräte GmBh, Wetzlar, Germany).

RESULTS

The mean corneal hysteresis was 10.56 ± 1.52 mm Hg in the study group and 11.16 ± 1.92 mm Hg in the control group (P = .022). The mean IOP was 14.9 ± 2.0 mm Hg in the study group and 14.1 ± 1.3 mm Hg in the control group (P = .003). Corneal hysteresis showed a significant, positive correlation with corneal resistance factor (P < .001, r = 0.851), IOPg (P = .044, r = 0.213), CCT (P < .001, r = 0.477), and IOP (P = .005, r = 0.295). Corneal hysteresis showed a significant, negative correlation with IOPcc (P = .001, r = -0.355), ACA (P = .005, r = -0.294), ACV (P = .019, r = -0.246), and ACD (P = .046, r = -0.211).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with childhood obesity have lower corneal hysteresis and higher IOPcc measurements when compared with healthy patients. Corneal tissue changes may occur in early life in childhood obesity, which could lead to ocular disease in the future. [J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus. 2020;57(2):103-107.].

Changes in Corneal Biomechanics and Intraocular Pressure Following Cataract Surgery

PURPOSE

To investigate the effects of cataract surgery on corneal biomechanics and intraocular pressure (IOP) measured with the updated Corvis ST tonometer (CST).

DESIGN

Prospective, interventional case series study.

METHODS

This study included 39 eyes of 39 cataract patients. CST measurements were performed at presurgery (Pre) as well as 1 week (1W), 1 month (1M), and 3 months (3M) postsurgery. The following CST parameters were recorded: deformation amplitude max (DA max), DA ratio max 1 mm and 2 mm, integrated radius, stiffness parameter at applanation 1 (SP A1), Ambrosio relational thickness to the horizontal profile (ARTh), Corvis biomechanical index (CBI), central corneal thickness (CCT), noncorrected intraocular pressure (IOPnct), and biomechanically corrected IOP (bIOP). IOP was also measured with Goldmann applanation tonometry and the noncontact tonometer CT-90A. All measurements were compared at each period using the linear mixed model, with and without adjustment for bIOP and CCT.

RESULTS

All IOP measurements decreased over time (P < .01). CCT was increased at 1W and 3M (P < .01), whereas ARTh was decreased at 1W and 1M (P < .01), but returned to its Pre level at 3M. DA max and Integrated radius were increased at 3M (P < .01), whereas SP A1 was decreased at 3M (P < .01). CBI was increased at 1W (P < .01), but returned to its Pre level at 1M.

CONCLUSIONS

IOP and Corneal biomechanical properties are changed after cataract surgery. In particular, SP A1 decreases while DA max and integrated radius increase, even at 3M, suggesting a less stiff cornea.

The effect of air pulse-driven whole eye motion on the association between corneal hysteresis and glaucomatous visual field progression

Corneal hysteresis (CH) measured with Ocular Response Analyzer (Reichert: ORA) has been reported to be closely related to the glaucomatous visual field (VF) progression. The air pulse applied to an eye not only induces corneal deformation, but also whole eye motion (WEM), which may result in an inaccurate measurement of CH. Here we investigated the influence of air pulse-driven WEM measured with the Corivs ST (CST^®, OCULUS) on the relationship between CH and VF progression in primary open angle-glaucoma patients. Using the CST parameters of the maximal WEM displacement (WEM-d) and the time to reach that displacement (WEM-t), the eyes were classified into subgroups (WEM-d low- and high-group, and WEM-t short- and long-group). For the whole population and all subgroups, the optimal linear mixed model to describe mean of total deviation (mTD) progression rate with eight reliable VFs was selected from all combinations of seven parameters including CH. As a result, optimal models for the mTD progression rate included CH in the whole population, the WEM-d low- group and the WEM-t short-group, but not in the WEM-d high-group and the WEM-t long-group. Our findings indicated association between CH and glaucomatous progression can be weakened because of large WEM.

Intraocular pressure and biomechanical corneal properties measure by ocular response analyser in patients with primary congenital glaucoma

PURPOSE

To measure the differences in corneal hysteresis (CH) and corneal resistance factor (CRF) in primary congenital glaucoma (PCG) and in control subjects using ocular response analyser (ORA) and also to compare intraocular pressure (IOP) measurements given by ORA against IOP given by Perkins tonometer, a handheld version of Goldman applanation tonometer (GAT), to determine correlation.

METHODS

One hundred and eighteen eyes of 78 patients with PCG (group I) and 103 eyes of 53 controls (group II) were evaluated using ORA. In all participants, IOP was measured using the Perkins tonometer. The ORA device uses applanation pressure peaks to generate the corneal-compensated IOP (IOPcc), which is reportedly independent of corneal thickness, and the measurement of Goldman-correlated IOP (IOPg), which is influenced by corneal thickness.

RESULTS

The measures in group I were as follows: IOPcc 20.92 ± 5.33; IOPg 18.87 ± 6.67; CH 8.51 ± 2.25; CRF 9.85 ± 3.03; and IOP measured by Goldman 18.32 ± 5.13. The measures in group II were as follows: IOPcc 14.33 ± 2.91; IOPg 14.77 ± 3.00; CH 11.37 ± 1.61; CRF 11.02 ± 1.74; and IOP measured by Goldman 13.74 ± 2.42. The differences of all parameters compared between both groups were statistically significant (p < 0.001 for CH and for all IOP measures and p = 0.001 for CRF). The values of IOPcc, IOPg and IOP measured with Goldman were higher in group I than the values in group II. However, CH and CRF values were lower in group I.

CONCLUSION

A decrease in CH and CRF has been observed in patients with PCG compared to controls. Future research should assess how these parameters are modified in PCG and whether they could provide more information about progression.

Changes in Corneal Biomechanical Properties After Descemet Stripping Automated Endothelial Keratoplasty for Pseudophakic Bullous Keratopathy

PURPOSE

To compare corneal biomechanical properties and intraocular pressure (IOP) in eyes with pseudophakic bullous keratopathy (PBK) before and after Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK).

METHODS

This prospective nonrandomized intrasubject comparative study was conducted on 44 eyes of 22 patients with the diagnosis of PBK who underwent DSAEK in one eye. IOP was measured by Goldmann applanation tonometer, and central corneal thickness was measured by ultrasound pachymetry. The ocular response analyzer was used to measure corneal hysteresis (CH), corneal resistance factor (CRF), Goldmann-related IOP, and cornea-compensated IOP. The same measurements were performed in the normal fellow eyes which served as controls. All measurements were performed preoperatively and 6 months postoperatively.

RESULTS

The mean patient age was 67 ± 14 years. Mean preoperative CH and CRF values in the DSAEK group were 5.77 ± 2.94 and 6.39 ± 2.72 mm Hg, respectively, which were significantly lower than those measured in the control group (8.2 ± 2.47 and 8.43 ± 2.49 mm Hg, respectively, P = 0.001 for both comparisons). Postoperatively, CH and CRF demonstrated a significant increase (7.09 ± 3.68 mm Hg, P = 0.05 and 8.21 ± 3.84 mm Hg, P = 0.03, respectively) in operated eyes approaching the normal values measured in the control eyes.

CONCLUSIONS

Corneal biomechanical parameters were significantly lower in PBK eyes than in the normal fellow eyes. These metrics significantly increased after DSAEK and reached values measured in the normal fellow eyes.

Corneal biomechanical properties changes after coaxial 2.2-mm microincision and standard 3.0-mm phacoemulsification

AIM

To compare the changes in corneal biomechanics measured by ocular response analyzer (ORA) after 2.2-mm microincision cataract surgery and 3.0-mm standard coaxial phacoemulsification.

METHODS

The prospective nonrandomized study comprised eyes with cataract that had 2.2-mm coaxial microincision or 3.0-mm standard incision phacoemulsification. The corneal hysteresis (CH), corneal resistance factor (CRF), corneal-compensated intraocular pressure (IOPcc) and Goldmann-correlated intraocular pressure (IOPg) were measured by ORA preoperatively and at 1d, 1-, 2-, 3- and 4-week postoperatively. Results were analyzed and compared between groups.

RESULTS

In both groups, CH decreased in the immediate postoperative period (P<0.05), returned to the preoperative level at one week (P=0.249) in the 2.2-mm group, and at two weeks in the 3.0-mm group (P=0.264); there was no significant change in CRF values. In 2.2-mm group, mean IOPcc and IOPg increased at 1d postoperatively (both P<0.05), and returned to preoperative level at one week (P=0.491 and P=0.923, respectively). In 3.0-mm group, mean IOPcc and IOPg increased at 1d and 1wk postoperatively (P=0.005 and P=0.029, respectively), and returned to preoperative level at 2wk (P=0.347 and P=0.887, respectively).

CONCLUSION

Significant differences between preoperative and postoperative corneal biomechanical values were found for CH, IOPcc and IOPg. But the recovery time courses were different between the two groups. The 2.2-mm coaxial microincision cataract surgery group seemed recovery faster compared to the 3.0-mm standard coaxial phacoemulsification group.

Assessment of the Ocular Response Analyzer as an Instrument for Measurement of Intraocular Pressure and Corneal Biomechanics

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study is to provide better understanding of the Ocular Response Analyzer (ORA) and how reliable it is to produce intraocular pressure (IOP) measurements that are free of the effects of corneal stiffness parameters, and stiffness estimates that are independent of IOP.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A numerical parametric study that closely represents the in-vivo conditions of the human eye and the ORA procedure was conducted to determine the correlation coefficient r(2) between ORA output and the values of true IOP and a number of stiffness parameters, namely corneal thickness, curvature and age. For the purpose of this exercise, the ORA output was put in the form k1P1+k2P2 where k1 and k2 were variables and P1 and P2 were ORA's measured applanation pressures. Two separate clinical datasets involving Moorfields Eye Hospital, London and the University of New South Wales, Sydney participants, respectively, were used to validate the numerical results.

RESULTS

The numerical study results show a strong association between (k1P1 + k2P2) and the true IOP over a wide range of k1 and k2 values apart from a narrow region approximately extending from (k1 = +2, k2 = -2) to (k1 = -2, k2 = +2). On the other hand, (k1· P1 + k2· P2) was found to have a strong association with CCT, R and age (the stiffness parameters) over the same narrow region, beyond which the association was weak. Similar trends were found with the two clinical datasets.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of this study show the potential of the ORA to provide reliable IOP measurements with weak dependence on the cornea's stiffness parameters and the considerably reduced reliability in producing stiffness estimates that are unaffected by IOP values.

Intraocular pressure and corneal biomechanics in Fuchs' endothelial dystrophy and after posterior lamellar keratoplasty

PURPOSE

  To evaluate the precision of techniques for measuring intraocular pressure (IOP) in corneas with presumably altered biomechanical properties.

METHODS

  Intraocular pressure was measured with a Goldmann applanation tonometer (GAT), ocular response analyzer (ORA) and dynamic contour tonometer (DCT) in 70 eyes. Thirty-five eyes were normal corneas, 18 eyes had Fuchs' endothelial dystrophy, and 17 eyes had undergone Descemet's stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK) surgery. Corneal hysteresis (CH), corneal resistance factor (CRF) as well as central corneal thickness (CCT) were recorded with the ORA.

RESULTS

  The measured cornea-corrected IOP using ORA was significantly higher than GAT in all three groups (p< 0.001). The DCT differed significantly from the Goldmann only in the Fuchs' group (p= 0.04). The Goldmann and DCT showed no significant between-group differences, whereas IOP measured with the ORA was different between groups (p< 0.001). CH in the DSEAK group differed significantly from the controls (p< 0.001), but there was no significant difference between the DSEAK and Fuchs' groups (p= 0.21). CCT did not differ significantly between the DSAEK and Fuchs' group (p= 0.47). However, both these groups differed significantly from the controls (p< 0.001).

CONCLUSION

  Corneal hysteresis and CRF are reduced in Fuchs' endothelial dystrophy as well as after posterior lamellar keratoplasty. GAT and DCT seem to measure IOP correctly in patients with Fuchs' endothelial dystrophy as well as after posterior lamellar keratoplasty. Corneal-corrected IOP as measured with the ORA appears to overestimate IOP in patients with Fuchs' endothelial dystrophy as well as after posterior lamellar keratoplasty.

Impaired corneal biomechanical properties and the prevalence of keratoconus in mitral valve prolapse

Objective. To investigate the biomechanical characteristics of the cornea in patients with mitral valve prolapse (MVP) and the prevalence of keratoconus (KC) in MVP. Materials and Methods. Fifty-two patients with MVP, 39 patients with KC, and 45 control individuals were recruited in this study. All the participants underwent ophthalmologic examination, corneal analysis with the Sirius system (CSO), and the corneal biomechanical evaluation with Reichert ocular response analyzer (ORA). Results. KC was found in six eyes of four patients (5.7%) and suspect KC in eight eyes of five patients (7.7%) in the MVP group. KC was found in one eye of one patient (1.1%) in the control group (P = 0.035). A significant difference occurred in the mean CH and CRF between the MVP and control groups (P = 0.006 and P = 0.009, resp.). All corneal biomechanical and topographical parameters except IOPcc were significantly different between the KC-MVP groups (P < 0.05). Conclusions. KC prevalence is higher than control individuals in MVP patients and the biomechanical properties of the cornea are altered in patients with MVP. These findings should be considered when the MVP patients are evaluated before refractive surgery.

Corneal hysteresis with intraocular pressure of a wide range: a test on porcine eyes

PURPOSE

To investigate the relationship between corneal hysteresis (CH) and intraocular pressure (IOP) using porcine eyes in the low to high IOP ranges.

METHODS

In vitro porcine eyes were used to investigate the relationship of CH and IOP. IOP was altered by changing the height of a drip stand within the dynamic range of 60 mm Hg. CH and IOP were measured with the Ocular Response Analyzer (ORA; Reichert Ophthalmic Instruments, Depew, NY) at different heights. Second-order polynomial regression method was employed to assess the nonlinear correlation of CH and IOP.

RESULTS

CH demonstrated an initial plateau stage with low IOP, which then decreased as IOP increased to higher values up to 60 mm Hg. The maximum CH value of approximately 6 to 8 mm Hg was achieved when IOP ranged from 11 to 25 mm Hg. The nonlinear regression lines of Goldmann correlated IOP (IOPg) and CH can be described as CH = − 0.0029 × IOPg2 + 0.1005 × IOPg + 5.2824, R2 = 0.3676, P < .05.

CONCLUSIONS

CH was relatively constant for lower values of IOP and showed a decreasing relationship at higher values of IOP. This nonlinear relationship provides insight into understanding the viscoelastic nature of CH over a wider range of IOP values. The experimental data on porcine eyes may indicate that IOP should be taken into account when analyzing the deformation response of the cornea to an applied air puff.

Corneal biomechanical parameters during pregnancy

PURPOSE

To evaluate the variation in biomechanical properties and central corneal thickness (CCT) for each trimester during pregnancy and to compare the values with those in nonpregnant women.

METHODS

We prospectively studied the eyes of 32 pregnant and 34 age-matched non-pregnant women. The parameters included corneal hysteresis (CH), corneal resistance factor (CRF), Goldmann-correlated intraocular pressure (IOP), and corneal-compensated IOP measured by the Ocular Response Analyzer (ORA). The CCT was also measured with an ultrasonic pachymeter attached to the ORA.

RESULTS

The mean age was 27.0 ± 3.8 years in the study group and 28.0 ± 4.1 years in the control group. The mean CH measurement was 10.6 ± 1.4 mmHg in the study group and 10.1 ± 1.3 mmHg in the control group. The mean CRF value was 9.6 ± 1.7 mmHg in the study group and 10.0 ± 1.4 mmHg in the control group. The mean CCT value was 541.1 ± 22.4 µm in the study group and 536.5 ± 27.1 µm in the control group. No statistically significant differences were found regarding CH, CRF, or CCT values between the 2 groups (independent t test, p = 0.160, p = 0.355, p = 0.450, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Hormonal changes during pregnancy may not affect corneal biomechanics. This may be due to the balanced effect of the various hormones on the cornea during pregnancy.

Corneal biomechanical properties: precision and influence on tonometry

PURPOSE

To assess the precision and reproducibility of the corneal biomechanical parameters, and their relationships with the intraocular pressure (IOP) measured with the Goldmann tonometer and a noncontact tonometer.

METHODS

Readings for biomechanical properties and for IOP measured with the Goldmann and noncontact tonometers, were taken on one randomly selected eye of 106 normal subjects, on each one of two measurement sessions. Measurements with the ocular response analyzer (ORA) and the noncontact tonometer were randomized, followed by the measurement of central corneal thickness and with the Goldmann tonometer.

RESULTS

Repeatability coefficients for CCT, corneal hysteresis (CH) and corneal resistance factor (CRF) in Session 1 were ± 0.01 μm, ± 3.05 mmHg and ± 2.62 mmHg, respectively. The mean CCT, CH, CRF, Goldmann and noncontact tonometry did not vary significantly between sessions. Reproducibility coefficients for CCT, CH and CRF were ± 0.02 μm, ± 2.19 mmHg and ± 1.97 mmHg, respectively. Univariate regression analysis showed that CCT, CH and CRF significantly (P<0.0001) correlated with the IOP measured with the Goldmann and noncontact tonometers (and with the differences between tonometers) in Session 1. There were no significant correlations with the differences between tonometers in Session 2. Multivariate analysis revealed a minimal effect of CCT on Goldmann measurements but a significant effect on those of the noncontact tonometer.

CONCLUSIONS

Measurement of the biomechanical properties of the cornea, using the ORA, are repeatable and reproducible, affect Goldmann tonometry less than noncontact tonometry, and have a minimal influence on the difference in measured intraocular pressure between tonometers.

Influence of corneal biomechanical properties on surgically induced astigmatism in cataract surgery

PURPOSE

To perform an overall follow-up of the morphologic, optical, and biomechanical properties of the cornea to determine new parameters influencing the refractive outcomes of cataract surgery.

DESIGN

Clinical study.

METHODS

Patients scheduled for cataract surgery were assessed for surgically induced corneal astigmatism (SIA) and higher-order aberrations, (HOAs) using a Scheimpflug rotating camera (Pentacam) together with corneal imaging by optical coherence tomography (Spectralis) and biomechanical analysis by the Ocular Response Analyzer preoperatively and 1, 7, and 30 days postoperatively. The central and peripheral corneal thicknesses; incision width, length, and architecture; corneal hysteresis (CH); and corneal resistance factor (CRF) were computed to identify new parameters influencing corneal optical changes that determine the final refractive result.

RESULTS

The study enrolled 40 patients (40 eyes). The SIA and HOAs were significantly lower after microincision surgery (≤ 2.2 mm) than after small-incision surgery (2.75 mm) (both P<.01). The CRF was significantly reduced with a direct corneal incision compared with a constructed incision (P<.01). Multivariate analysis showed that SIA was correlated not only with incision width (P<.05) but also with preoperative CH (P<.01). Corneal 3rd-order trefoil depended on incision width (P<.01).

CONCLUSIONS

In addition to the well-known influence of incision size on SIA, CH also modulates optical changes. The biomechanical features of the cornea should be taken into account preoperatively to better predict the refractive outcomes of cataract surgery.

Effects of pterygium on the biomechanical properties of the cornea: a pilot study

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the changes induced by a pterygium or its surgical removal on the biomechanical properties of the cornea and to determine factors that might affect these parameters.

METHODS

This prospective pilot interventional, non-randomized, observer-masked study included 20 eyes of 20 patients with a unilateral primary pterygium (pterygium group) and 19 fellow healthy eyes (control group). The bare sclera technique with one-minute application of 0.02% mitomycin C intraoperatively was performed in all cases. The follow-up period was one month. The preoperative and postoperative biomechanical properties of the cornea were measured using the Reichert ocular response analyzer (ORA).

RESULTS

The corneal hysteresis (CH) decreased significantly (P<.01) in eyes with a pterygium compared to the control eyes, while surgery did not significantly change the CH compared to preoperatively. There were no significant changes in the corneal resistance factor or the central corneal thickness.

CONCLUSIONS

Primary active pterygium (grades 1 or 2) induce a reduction of corneal biomechanical features. Further studies are needed in populations, with longer follow-ups and bigger pterygium that may involve wider keratectomy to confirm our results.

[Influence of corneal biomechanical properties on myopic regression after laser in situ keratomileusis]

BACKGROUND

Laser in situ keratomileusis is a safe and accepted method for correcting myopia. The operational results in terms of accuracy as well as the subjective acceptance of patients for corrections to - 8 D are now considered to be promising (Seiler, Refraktive Chirurgie der Hornhaut, 2000); however, postoperative results show individual patient problems in long-term stability. It is believed that the preoperative condition of the cornea (e.g. thickness, biomechanical properties) could have an influence on postoperative problems such as myopic regression.

METHOD

This study included a total of 46 eyes from 25 patients. At 3 months postoperatively, 15 patients (19 eyes) showed a SEQ of -0.50 D or more. Within this group, 11 patients (15 eyes) developed a regression (regression group) within the first 3 postoperative months. The remainder of the total group did not show any regression (stability group). The subjects of this study were on average 33 ± 8 years (stability group) and 31 ± 7 years old (regression group). The corneal thickness was tested and refractive error, visual acuity (BCVA/UCVA) and intraocular pressure was measured. In addition, the corneal hysteresis (CH) and corneal resistance factor (CRF) were determined.

RESULTS

The mean preoperative spherical equivalent refraction was -3.14 D ± 1.41 D (SE) in the stability group and - 6.47 D ± 1.40 D (p = 0.001)in the regression group. Also, the postoperative spherical equivalents were statistically significant different (p < 0.05). In contrast, the mean preoperative corneal thickness showed no differences in both groups (p = 0.96) (stability group 563 ± 36 µm and regression group 563 ± 28 µm).

CONCLUSIONS

The aim of the study to detect a possible causal relationship between myopia regression after LASIK and the biomechanical properties of the cornea and corneal thickness could not be clearly identified.

Relative importance of factors affecting corneal hysteresis measurement

PURPOSE

To evaluate the relative influences of several demographic, ocular, and systemic parameters on corneal hysteresis (CH).

METHODS

This is a prospective, observational, cross-sectional study using subjects recruited from consecutive Albuquerque VAMC eye clinic patients. We classified eligible subjects as primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG), ocular hypertension, glaucoma suspect, or normal. We used the Ocular Response Analyzer, Pascal Dynamic Contour Tonometer, and Goldmann applanation tonometer to obtain intraocular pressure (IOP), CH, corneal resistance factor, and ocular pulse amplitude values. We also obtained corneal curvature, central corneal thickness (CCT), axial length, retinal nerve fiber layer thickness, clinical cup/disc ratio (CDR) estimates, and standard automated perimetry metrics (mean defect, pattern standard deviation). We gathered glycosylated hemoglobin (A1C) data through chart review. Multivariate regression analyses were used to determine independent relationships between CH and the other parameters.

RESULTS

Three hundred seventeen eyes in 317 subjects were studied (116 POAG, 87 ocular hypertension, 47 glaucoma suspect, and 67 normal). In univariate regression analysis, CH varied directly with CCT (β = 0.39, p < 0.001), corneal curvature (β = 0.16, p = 0.01), corneal resistance factor (β = 0.57, p < 0.001), A1C (β = 0.15, p = 0.01), mean defect (β = 0.29, p < 0.001), and retinal nerve fiber layer (β = 0.31, p < 0.001). Factors inversely related to CH were age (β = -0.22, p < 0.001), IOP (β = -0.29, p < 0.001), ocular pulse amplitude (β = -0.11, p = 0.04), CDR (β = -0.34, p < 0.001), and pattern standard deviation (β = -0.29, p < 0.001). CH was lower in POAG compared with the other diagnostic groups. In multivariate analysis, CH was independently associated with age, IOP, CCT, A1C, glaucoma diagnosis, and CDR. Of these factors, CCT and IOP demonstrated twice as much influence on CH compared with the other four factors.

CONCLUSIONS

Although this study identified six separate variables that independently influence CH values, the overall r value indicates that these variables together only explain 40% of CH variability. These results suggest that other significant sources of variability exist and deserve investigation.

Response of corneal hysteresis and central corneal thickness following clear corneal cataract surgery

PURPOSE

To evaluate the effect of routine phacoemulsification in corneal viscoelastic properties determined by corneal hysteresis (CH) and central corneal thickness (CCT) and to explore the impact of phaco energy on the above parameters.

METHODS

Forty-one eyes of 41 patients undergoing cataract surgery were enrolled in this prospective study. CH and CCT were measured preoperatively, 1 day and 1 week postoperatively. CCT measurement was performed using a non-contact optical pachymeter followed by ocular response analyzer (ORA) examination. Intraoperatively ultrasound time, average phaco power and effective phaco time (EPT) were recorded.

RESULTS

Mean CH was 10.05±1.86 mmHg preoperatively, 8.25±1.85 mmHg 1 day and 9.12±1.37 mmHg 1 week postoperatively (p<0.001). The mean CCT was 534±37.33 μm preoperatively, 592.22±46.34 μm 1 day and 563.21±49.84 μm 1 week postoperatively (p<0.001). CCT and CH were statistically significantly correlated preoperatively (p=0.01, r=0.396). This correlation was not sustained on the first postoperative day (p=0.094, r=0.265) and was re-established 1 week postoperatively (p=0.002, r=0.568). On the first postoperative day, the CCT increase was positively correlated with EPT (p=0.009, r=0.404), which was not found between CH change and EPT.

CONCLUSION

Structural corneal alterations following cataract surgery resulted in a statistical change in CH and CCT. These two parameters responded in a different manner that clearly demarcates their different nature. On the first postoperative day, CCT increase was correlated at a statistically significant level with intraoperative EPT. This correlation was not found with CH reduction. Other factors, besides cornea oedema or phacoemulsification energy, could be responsible for this CH modification.

Combining corneal hysteresis with central corneal thickness and intraocular pressure for glaucoma risk assessment

PURPOSE

To determine whether adjusting corneal hysteresis (CH) values for central corneal thickness (CCT) and intraocular pressure (IOP) improves its capability to differentiate primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) from ocular hypertension (OH).

METHODS

This prospective, observational, cross-sectional study included 169 eyes of 169 subjects with a diagnosis of POAG (n=81) or OH (n=88). We utilized the Ocular Response Analyzer (ORA), Pascal Dynamic Contour Tonometer (DCT), Goldmann applanation tonometer (GAT), and ORA ultrasound pachymeter to obtain CH, IOP, and CCT values. Correlational, regression, and t-test analyses were conducted before and after the sample was divided into low, intermediate, and thick CCT subgroups.

RESULTS

In the full sample, CH and CCT were moderately correlated (r=0.44, P<0.001). Although both were related to diagnosis in univariate regression analysis, only CH was independently related to glaucoma diagnosis in multivariate analysis. After the sample was divided into CCT tertiles, CH was significantly lower in POAG vs OH eyes within all three CCT subgroups, and CH was the only multivariate variable that differentiated POAG from OH in each CCT subgroup. Moreover, the relationship between CH and diagnosis was more robust within the CCT subgroups compared with the full sample, suggesting that integrating CCT into CH interpretation is beneficial. Adjusting CH for IOP did not aid diagnostic precision in this study.

CONCLUSION

Our findings suggest that combining CH and CCT for glaucoma risk assessment improves diagnostic capability compared to using either factor alone. Conversely, adjusting CH for IOP provided no clear clinical benefit in this study.

Reproducibility of viscoelastic property and intraocular pressure measurements obtained with the Ocular Response Analyzer

PURPOSE

To analyse the reproducibility of corneal hysteresis (CH), corneal resistance factor (CRF), Goldmann-correlated intraocular pressure (IOPg) and corneal-compensated intraocular pressure (IOPcc) obtained with the ocular response analyzer (ORA).

METHODS

This is a prospective study, nonmasked, of eight successive examinations with the ORA device in 60 normal eyes. Using 30 eyes (one eye per subject), the reproducibility was assessed by comparing the first series of four examinations to the second four and by calculating the within-subject coefficient of variation. The correlation and difference with the fellow eye were analysed, respectively.

RESULTS

The mean values were 10.7 ± 1.8 mmHg, CRF; 10.6 ± 1.6 mmHg, CH; 15.9 ± 3.9 mmHg, IOPg and 16.2 ± 3.7 mmHg, IOPcc. The reproducibility was significantly different for CRF (5.2 ± 5.9%), CH (7.3 ± 8.6%), IOPg (7.7 ± 6.7%) and IOPcc (10.1 ± 8.0%); p < 0.001. Considering the reproducibility, CRF correlated with CH (rs = 0.55; p < 0.001) and showed to be independent of IOPg and IOPcc. The score spread was best for CRF (2.6 ± 1.5 mmHg; 24.0%) compared to IOPg (4.3 ± 1.5 mmHg; 28.1%) and CH (3.1 ± 1.7 mmHg; 29.9%) and worst for IOPcc (5.5 ± 2.5 mmHg; 34.4%). The lowest difference with the fellow eye was observed for CRF (5.0%; p = 0.09). The correlation with the fellow eye was high, especially for IOPcc and CRF (rs > 0.9; p < 0.001) followed by IOPg and CH (rs > 0.8; p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

The ORA device provides reproducible information on viscoelastic properties of the cornea in normal eyes notably CRF and CH. IOPcc was less reproducible. Four measurements per eye were necessary to reach a 10% precision and six for 5%.

Corneal biomechanical characteristics in patients with diabetes mellitus

PURPOSE

To compare the corneal biomechanical properties in eyes of patients with diabetes mellitus and in those of subjects without diabetes mellitus.

SETTING

Hospital eye clinic.

DESIGN

Comparative case series.

METHODS

Corneal hysteresis (CH) and corneal response factor (CRF) were measured in diabetic patients and nondiabetic subjects using the Ocular Response Analyzer. Central corneal thickness (CCT) and intraocular pressure (IOP) were also measured. Differences in corneal biomechanical properties were determined using a 1-way analysis of variance. Interassociations between ocular and diabetic parameters were also evaluated.

RESULTS

Sixty-one eyes of 61 diabetic patients and 123 eyes of 123 nondiabetic subjects were evaluated. The CRF was significantly greater in the eyes of diabetic patients (mean difference, 1.09 mm Hg; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.49-1.69; P = .001). There were no significant differences in CCT or CH between groups (CH: mean difference, 0.38 mm Hg; 95% CI, -0.21 to 0.97 mm Hg; P = .21; CCT: mean difference, 0.13 μm; 95% CI, -10.6 to 10.8 μm; P =.98). Corneal hysteresis and CRF were weakly correlated with blood glucose concentration (slopes: CH: 0.28; 95% CI, 0.03-0.50; P = .03; CRF: 0.27; 95% CI 0.02-0.49; P = .04). In a multiple regression analysis, the effects of blood glucose concentration were reduced and age and CCT became significant predictors of CH and CRF.

CONCLUSIONS

The eyes in diabetic patients displayed altered corneal biomechanics that may be related to blood glucose concentration. Further studies are required to establish the effects of long-term poor glucose control on corneal biomechanical properties and how this might affect the diabetic patient's response to refractive surgery procedures.

Evaluation of the intraocular pressure measured with the ocular response analyzer

PURPOSE

Comparison of the magnitude and repeatability of the intraocular pressure (IOP) measured with the Ocular Response Analyzer (ORA) to that measured with the Goldmann tonometer.

METHODS

Two sets of IOP measurements were made, for 89 eyes of eighty-nine subjects, approximately 1-week apart. Goldmann tonometry was performed subsequent to non-contact tonometry, in which the order of measurement was randomized between the ORA and the Topcon CT80 non-contact tonometer (CT80). Each method was assessed twice for intrasession repeatability. The limits of agreement between each non-contact pressure and that measured with the Goldmann tonometer were assessed once per session. The level of statistical significance was 0.05.

RESULTS

The mean differences between the ORA-corneal compensated, Goldmann-correlated, and CT80-IOP (ORA-IOPcc; ORA-IOPg and CT80-IOP) versus the Goldmann IOP were -0.3 +/- 2.7 mmHg (mean +/- SD), -0.3 +/- 2.2 mmHg and -0.3 +/- 2.1 mmHg, respectively for session 1 and 0.3 +/- 3.0 mmHg, 0.2 +/- 2.2 mmHg, and -0.5 +/- 2.2 mmHg, respectively, for session 2. The repeatability coefficients were +/- 5.3 mmHg, +/- 4.2 mmHg, +/- 2.5 mmHg, and +/- 1.9 mmHg, respectively for ORA-IOPcc, ORA-IOPg, CT80-IOP, and Goldmann IOP in session 1 and +/- 3.8 mmHg, +/- 3.6 mmHg, +/- 1.6 mmHg, and +/- 1.9 mmHg, respectively for session 2.

CONCLUSION

The repeatability indices for the ORA were poorer than those with the Goldmann tonometer and the CT80 in both sessions. However, the average IOP measured with the ORA did not vary significantly from those measured with the other two tonometers in either session. The ORA provides valid, repeatable measures of IOP.