Anterior segment tumor biopsy using an aspiration cutter technique: clinical experience

Micro-incision, trans-iridal aspiration cutter biopsy for ciliary body tumours

OBJECTIVE

To perform micro-incision, trans-iridal, aspiration-cutter-assisted biopsy for ciliary body tumours.

DESIGN

Retrospective, nonrandomized, observational, interventional case series.

METHODS

Five consecutive patients undergoing ciliary body tumour biopsy were clinically diagnosed using slit-lamp photography, gonioscopy, high-frequency ultrasound imaging, and systemic radiographic staging. A 1-2 mm clear cornea incision was placed opposite to the central clock hour of the ciliary body tumour. Viscoelastic was infused into the anterior chamber for stabilization and endothelial protection. Then, a 27-gauge aspiration cutter was used to make an iridotomy at the iris root and then extend through the iris into the tumour. Biopsy was performed using mechanical cutting starting at 300 cuts per minute and aspiration at 600 mm Hg. After withdrawal of the cutter from the eye, the effluent tube was flushed into a 3 cc syringe, inspected for specimen under the operating microscope and sent for pathology. Multiple biopsies were performed on each patient. Viscoelastic was removed and Seidel examination of the corneal wound performed.

RESULTS

Five eyes were biopsied. A mean 3.6 passes were used to obtain tumour tissue. Tumour cells and tissue were obtained in all cases. Cytologic, histopathologic, and immuno-histochemical analysis were performed (100%, n = 5/5). Diagnoses included melanoma (60%, n = 3/5), melanocytoma (20%, n = 1/5), and leiomyoma (20%, n = 1/5). Transient postoperative hyphemas cleared within 1 week (80%, n = 4/5). No secondary glaucoma, infection, or cataracts were noted.

CONCLUSION

Aspiration-cutter biopsy through the iris root provided a minimally invasive, safe method for obtaining ciliary body tissue for cytology, histopathology, and immunohistochemical analysis.

Iris lymphoma-a systematic guide for diagnosis and treatment

Iris lymphomas are rare malignant neoplasms arising either as primary tumors in the iris or as secondary tumors involving the iris. We summarize previously published data and make recommendations for work-up strategies for cases of suspected iris lymphoma. Our objective is to provide a structured overview of the typical clinical symptoms and signs, the pathologic, ophthalmic, as well as hematologic work-up for diagnosis, treatment, and follow-up of iris lymphomas and offer a flowchart on how to diagnose and treat these tumors.

Uveal melanoma

Uveal melanoma (UM) is the most common primary intraocular malignancy in adults. UMs are usually initiated by a mutation in GNAQ or GNA11, unlike cutaneous melanomas, which usually harbour a BRAF or NRAS mutation. The annual incidence in Europe and the USA is ~6 per million population per year. Risk factors include fair skin, light-coloured eyes, congenital ocular melanocytosis, ocular melanocytoma and the BAP1-tumour predisposition syndrome. Ocular treatment aims at preserving the eye and useful vision and, if possible, preventing metastases. Enucleation has largely been superseded by various forms of radiotherapy, phototherapy and local tumour resection, often administered in combination. Ocular outcomes are best with small tumours not extending close to the optic disc and/or fovea. Almost 50% of patients develop metastatic disease, which usually involves the liver, and is usually fatal within 1 year. Although UM metastases are less responsive than cutaneous melanoma to chemotherapy or immune checkpoint inhibitors, encouraging results have been reported with partial hepatectomy for solitary metastases, with percutaneous hepatic perfusion with melphalan or with tebentafusp. Better insight into tumour immunology and metabolism may lead to new treatments.

Uveal Melanoma Biopsy: A Review

Intraocular tumor diagnosis is based on clinical findings supported by additional imaging tools, such as ultrasound, optical coherence tomography and angiographic techniques, usually without the need for invasive procedures or tissue sampling. Despite improvements in the local treatment of uveal melanoma (UM), the prevention and treatment of the metastatic disease remain unsolved, and nearly 50% of patients develop liver metastasis. The current model suggests that tumor cells have already spread by the time of diagnosis, remaining dormant until there are favorable conditions. Tumor sampling procedures at the time of primary tumor diagnosis/treatment are therefore now commonly performed, usually not to confirm the diagnosis of UM, but to obtain a tissue sample for prognostication, to assess patient's specific metastatic risk. Moreover, several studies are ongoing to identify genes specific to UM tumorigenesis, leading to several potential targeted therapeutic strategies. Genetic information can also influence the surveillance timing and metastatic screening type of patients affected by UM. In spite of the widespread use of biopsies in general surgical practice, in ophthalmic oncology the indications and contraindications for tumor biopsy continue to be under debate. The purpose of this review paper is to critically evaluate the role of uveal melanoma biopsy in ophthalmic oncology.

[New molecular pathological strategies for malignant iris tumors]

BACKGROUND

Molecular pathological research offers new chances for the diagnostic and therapeutic management of malignant iris tumors. Besides immunohistological and polymerase chain reaction analyses further techniques, such as multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification, microsatellite analyses and next-generation sequencing are able to detect various mutations in the tumor genome.

OBJECTIVE

An up to date review of new molecular pathological strategies for malignant iris tumors was carried out.

METHODS

This article provides a review of the recent literature based on a PubMed search and clinical experience with iris tumors.

RESULTS

The diagnostic characteristics and targeted treatment options are presented, exemplified by iris melanoma and iris carcinoma metastases. In iris melanomas, mutations in the GNA11 and GNAQ genes (in approximately 85% of the cases) seem to be important. Furthermore, the monosomy-3 status should be investigated in these tumors. In iris lymphomas, molecular pathological analyses are essential for an exact diagnosis. Detection of mutations in MYD88, BRAF, KLF2, ID3, TCF3, STAT3, RHo, TET2, IDH2, CXCR4, CD79B and DNMT3A are helpful. In particular, the detection of the CD20 antigen is of therapeutic relevance because this lymphoma subgroup responds well to rituximab, a CD20 antibody treatment. In iris carcinoma metastases, investigations for mutations are helpful because then a targeted treatment seems to be possible.

CONCLUSION

Molecular pathological analyses will become essential in the future management of iris tumors because they play a key role towards a personalized treatment approach.

Microincision, Aspiration Cutter-Assisted Multifocal Iris Biopsy for Melanoma

Purpose

To describe a minimally invasive method to create multifocal full-thickness surgical iridectomy biopsies.

Methods

Seven patients suspected to have diffuse iris melanoma underwent multifocal surgical iridectomy biopsy through a single 1.0-mm clear corneal incision. A 25-G inked trocar was used to create one visible corneal portal, through which the anterior chamber was filled with sodium hyaluronate 1%. Then, a 25-G aspiration cutter probe was introduced through the corneal incision such that the aspiration portal was occluded by the iris biopsy sites. Then aspiration (600 mm Hg) cutting (300 cuts per minute) was used to create full- and partial-thickness surgical iridectomy biopsies at multiple locations. After each biopsy the probe was removed, and its contents aspirated into a separate 3-mL syringe (marked by clock hour location). The sodium hyaluronate 1% was removed and wound checked for leakage.

Results

Diagnostic specimens were obtained in all cases. Five were found to be diffuse iris melanomas and 2 were indeterminate iris melanocytic proliferations. No patients developed a secondary increase in intraocular pressure, hyphema, infection, cataract, or vision loss. No cases of intraocular tumor dissemination were observed. No patient complained of glare or monocular diplopia. Three of 7 corneal wounds were self-sealing.

Conclusions

Multifocal surgical iridectomy biopsy can be minimally invasive and effective allowing for partial- and full-thickness iris biopsy. Use of a 25-G aspiration cutting probe allowed for small incision surgery, rapid rehabilitation, and no significant complications.

Anterior segment tumor aspiration cutter-assisted biopsy: experience with pathology

PURPOSE

To report pathologic evaluation and diagnostic yield of an aspiration cutter-assisted biopsy of anterior segment tumors.

DESIGN

Retrospective, consecutive, interventional case series.

METHODS

Fifty-five eyes of 55 patients with iris and iridociliary tumors underwent an aspiration cutter-assisted biopsy at a single institution. Cytospin and cell-block preparations were performed on all biopsy samples. Bleached preparations and a panel of immunohistochemical stains were performed in selected cases. Cytologic diagnosis was correlated with clinical diagnosis and with histopathologic diagnosis, when available. Main outcome measures were (1) specimen cellularity, (2) diagnostic studies performed, (3) cytopathologic diagnosis, and (4) concordance with histopathologic diagnosis.

RESULTS

Specimen cellularity was adequate for cytopathologic interpretation of cytospin preparations in 55 (98.2%) of 56 biopsies. Twenty-three (41%) of 56 biopsy samples had diagnostic material in cell-block preparations. The most common cytopathologic diagnoses were melanoma (n = 39/56; 69.6%), melanocytoma (n = 4/56; 7.1%), nevus (n = 4/56; 7.1%), lymphoma (n = 2/56; 3.6%), and epithelial implantation cyst (n = 2/56; 3.6%). One biopsy sample (1.8%) yielded nondiagnostic material. Wide incisional or excisional biopsy confirmation was available in 13 (23.2%) of 56 aspiration cutter-assisted biopsy cases. Cytopathologic diagnoses were consistent with histopathologic diagnosis in 12 (92.3%) of 13 cases.

CONCLUSIONS

Although specialized pathologic techniques were necessary to maximize material available for diagnosis, all biopsies yielded cellular material and 41% yielded diagnostic tissue in cell block preparation. Although lower than the yield of wide incisional or excisional biopsy, aspiration cutter-assisted biopsy of anterior segment tumors achieved a diagnostic yield of 98.2%.