Simultaneous topography-guided photorefractive keratectomy followed by corneal collagen cross-linking for keratoconus

Combined topography-guided photorefractive keratectomy and corneal collagen crosslinking

PURPOSE

This study aimed to report the long-term results of combined topography-guided photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) and accelerated corneal collagen cross-linking (CXL) for keratoconus using the Zeiss refractive coordinated system.

METHODS

A prospective interventional study was conducted in a tertiary eye care hospital in South India. Patients with mild-to-moderate progressive keratoconus and corneal pachymetry greater than 450 µm were included. They underwent customized topography-guided PRK followed by CXL. Uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA), corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA), and keratometry readings and complications were evaluated at 1, 3, 6, 12, and 24 months postoperatively.

RESULTS

Thirty patients (30 eyes) were included in the study. All study parameters showed a statistically significant improvement postoperatively over baseline values. At 24 months, the mean UDVA improved from 0.8 ± 0.180 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR) to 0.38 ± 0.118 logMAR ( P -value <0.001) and CDVA improved from 0.467 ± 0.142 logMAR to 0.227 ± 0.078 logMAR ( P -value <0.001). The mean flat, steep, and maximum keratometry values were significantly reduced by 2.133, 3, and 4.54 diopters, respectively, at the last follow-up examination ( P -value <0.001).

CONCLUSION

The combined topography-guided PRK and accelerated CXL procedure seem to be a promising treatment alternative for early keratoconus. This is the first such study on the Zeiss refractive coordinated system. However, further studies with a larger study population and longer follow-up periods are required to draw final conclusions about the benefits of this procedure in keratoconus.

Refractive surgical approaches to keratoconus: A systematic review and network meta-analysis

Advancements in diagnostic methods and surgical techniques for keratoconus (KC) have increased non-invasive treatment options. Successful surgical planning for KC involves a combination of clinical science, empirical evidence, and surgical expertise. Assessment of disease progression is crucial, and halting the progression should be the focus if it is progressive. While surgeons used to rely on experience alone to decide the surgical method, comparing the network of primary factors, such as visual acuity, across studies can help them choose the most appropriate treatments for each patient and achieve optimal outcomes. Meticulous tabulation methods facilitate interpretation, highlighting the importance of selecting the correct surgical and rehabilitation approach based on each patient's condition and stage of the disease. We detail the outcomes of a comprehensive network meta-analysis comparing the effectiveness of various combined therapeutic refractive treatments for KC at identical stages of the disease, spanning four distinct follow-up intervals. Additionally, the comprehensive analysis suggests that for corneas with optimal best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) preoperatively (classified as regular), combining phakic intraocular lenses with intracorneal ring segments (ICRS) and corneal cross-linking (CXL) could offer the best therapeutic approach provided the disease stage does not exceed stage 3. For irregular corneas, although initial follow-ups show a significant difference in BCVA with surface ablation, longer-term follow-ups recommend combining surface ablation with ICRS and CXL, especially at higher stages.

Advanced Surface Ablation in a Patient With Suspect Topography: A Case Report

The purpose of this clinical report is to describe a 10-year clinical outcome of advanced surface ablation with photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) in a patient who had been previously incorrectly diagnosed with keratoconus (KC). Corneal ectasia is a rare but extremely relevant complication of laser vision correction, and KC represents a major contraindication for these procedures. Nonetheless, some surface ablation procedures, such as PRK, might be a valid option for particular patients with atypical corneal topography or subclinical or mild forms of KC. Patient education and complete preoperative refractive multimodal imaging are essential for a more conscious therapeutic decision, minimizing iatrogenic ectasia, as well as decreasing the number of patients who are incorrectly denied refractive surgery, as was the patient presented in this study.

Efficacy comparison of combining cross-linking and refractive laser ablation in progressive keratoconus: systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

This study assessed the effect of combining corneal collagen cross-linking (CXL) with refractive laser ablation techniques for the treatment of keratoconus, a progressive corneal disorder.

METHODS

We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the effect of combined CXL and refractive techniques. We included all published clinical trials or observational studies published by September 1, 2023. We calculated and compared the standardized mean difference (SMD) between CXL alone and CXL plus laser ablation for uncorrected distance visual acuity, best-corrected distance visual acuity, spherical equivalent manifest refraction, sphere and cylinder, flat keratometry (K1), steep keratometry (K2), and central corneal thickness.

RESULTS

We identified 13 studies that fulfilled our inclusion and exclusion criteria. The average follow-up was 21.3 ± 11.8 months. The CXL plus laser ablation group showed improvement in uncorrected distance visual acuity logMAR (SMD, -0.35; 95% CI, -0.67 to -0.04; p = 0.029), best-corrected distance visual acuity logMAR (SMD, -0.17; 95% CI, -0.30 to -0.03; p = 0.014), spherical equivalent manifest refraction (SMD, -0.28; 95% CI, 0.06-0.50; p = 0.013), and change in maximal corneal curvature (Kmax; SMD, -0.41; 95% CI, -0.69 to -0.13; p = 0.004) compared with CXL alone. However, central corneal thickness decreased further among patients who underwent CXL plus laser ablation (SMD, -0.37; 95% CI, -0.66 to -0.07; p = 0.016). No effect was observed in terms of sphere (p = 0.878), cylinder (p = 0.859), K1 (p = 0.907), or K2 (p = 0.169). Ectasia was not observed as an adverse effect resulting from the additional corneal ablation performed during the CXL treatments.

CONCLUSIONS

This study showed that combining refractive laser ablation techniques with standard or accelerated CXL treatment improved visual and refractive outcomes and anterior corneal curvature values.

Corneal Higher Order Aberrations and Epithelial Remodeling With Femtosecond Laser-Assisted LASIK Topography-guided and Customized Asphericity Ablation in the Contralateral Eye: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Prospective Study

PURPOSE

To evaluate refractive results, corneal higher order aberrations (HOAs), and epithelial remodeling in the preoperative and postoperative period of regular corneas that had topography-guided femtosecond laser-assisted laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) (Contoura WaveLight; Alcon Laboratories, Inc) and compare them with the contralateral eye that underwent ablation customized by asphericity (Custom-Q WaveLight; Alcon Laboratories, Inc) in myopic eyes with or without astigmatism.

METHODS

A prospective, randomized, and double-blind study was conducted. Patients underwent preoperative and postoperative epithelial mapping and corneal tomography to assess the epithelial thickness map, HOAs of the corneal anterior surface, visual acuity, and refractive evaluation.

RESULTS

This study enrolled 96 normal eyes of 48 patients. Uncorrected distance visual acuity of 20/20 or better was achieved in 97% of patients and gains in corrected distance visual acuity and effectiveness in correcting refractive astigmatism were similar in both techniques. Seventeen sectors of the corneal epithelium map were assessed by spectral-domain optical coherence tomography and no significant differences were found between techniques preoperatively and postoperatively (P > .05). HOA root mean square, coma Z3±1, trefoil Z3-3, and tissue consumption exhibited statistically significant between-technique differences (P < .05).

CONCLUSIONS

The Contoura and Custom-Q techniques were similar with respect to refractive and visual outcomes after 3 months, as well as in epithelial remodeling. The Contoura provides lower postoperative HOA root mean square, coma Z3±1, and trefoil Z3-3 values, but the techniques showed no differences in the correction of the corneal astigmatic wavefront component and in the spherical aberration after 3 months. [J Refract Surg. 2023;39(11):751-758.].

Simultaneous Topography-guided Custom Ablation With Corneal Cross-linking for Keratoconus: 10-Year Prospective Outcomes

PURPOSE

To assess 10-year visual and tomographic outcomes of topography-guided custom ablation (T-CAT) with corneal cross-linking (CXL) in eyes with keratoconus.

METHODS

T-CAT with CXL was performed in 600 eyes (522 patients). Based on the T-CAT ablation plan, the theoretical maximum ablation depth was 50 µm after epithelium removal. After ablation, accelerated corneal cross-linking (CXL) was performed in the central 8-mm zone (9 mW/cm2 for 10 minutes in "epi-off" mode). The visual acuity and tomography were assessed.

RESULTS

There was significant improvement in uncorrected (P = .001) and corrected (P = .001) distance visual acuity after the procedure. Keratometry, root mean square lower order aberrations and higher order aberrations, defocus, coma 90°, and spherical aberration reduced significantly after surgery at 10 years of follow-up (P < .005). All Pentacam (Oculus Optikgerate GmbH) tomographic variables showed significant changes indicating regularization after T-CAT (P < .005). Flattening of greater than 5.00 diopters in maximum keratometry was noted in 6 eyes (1%). Two of 600 eyes progressed postoperatively and required repeat CXL.

CONCLUSIONS

T-CAT plus CXL is a safe and effective technique even in the long term for regularizing the anterior corneal surface with significant visual improvement and reduction in higher order corneal aberrations. [J Refract Surg. 2023;39(11):759-766.].

Combined simultaneous photorefractive keratectomy and collagen cross-linking in keratoconus suspect patients

PURPOSE

To evaluate the safety and efficacy of combined simultaneous photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) with collagen cross-linking (CXL) in keratoconus suspects (KCS).

METHODS

This was a retrospective, non-randomized study of KCS patients who underwent combined simultaneous PRK with CXL. The efficacy, safety, refractive outcomes, and corneal wavefront aberration changes were assessed after the surgery and compared with existing preoperative data.

RESULTS

Fifty-six eyes of 28 patients, including 20 females (71.4%), with a mean age of 30.92±4.09 years, were enrolled. The mean follow-up was 19.46±8.48 months (range: 7-35). At the conclusion of the study, mean uncorrected distance visual acuity LogMAR improved from 0.89±0.44 preoperatively to 0.04±0.09 postoperatively (P<0.001). In addition, a statistically significant corneal flattening was observed postoperatively, with a decrease in manifest refraction. A statistically significant increase was found in higher-order aberrations (P<0.001), horizontal coma (P<0.001), and spherical aberration (P<0.001) compared with preoperatively. Postoperatively, 41% exhibited refractive astigmatism of 0.50 diopter (D) or less; 83.8% showed 1.00 D or less.

CONCLUSION

The results of our study indicate that combined simultaneous PRK with CXL can be a safe and effective method for treating refractive instability in KCS patients.

Outcomes of topography-guided PRK/CXL in keratoconus using the NIDEK CXIII system-"Bharat Protocol" (Pilot study)

Purpose

Outcome of topography-guided excimer laser ablation in conjunction with accelerated, high-fluence cross-linking in corneal ecstatic disease using the NIDEK CXIII equipped with CATz algorithm from the FinalFit software-"Bharat Protocol."

Methods

Retrospective case record review of 30 eyes of 17 patients of stage 1-3 keratoconus who underwent the procedure was performed. Data collected were for visual acuity, distortion-induced eye pain, and keratometry. Pachymetry, lower order and higher order aberrations, spherical aberrations, and topographic cylinder were documented from by Scheimpflug imaging (Pentacam 70700: Oculus, Wetzlar, Germany).

Results

At a minimum follow-up of 6 months (range 6.2-13 months), there was significant improvement in UCVA (P < 0.00001), BCVA (P = 0.0061), decrease in Kmax (P = 0.0349), Ksteep (P < 0.0411), Kflat (P = 0.0099), and pachymetry (P = 0.0001). Significant improvement was also seen in distortion-induced eye pain (27/30 to 2/30; P < 0.00001). A more than two-line improvement in UCVA and BCVA was seen in 23/30 and 17/30 cases, respectively. Ectasia was stabilized in all cases at the last follow-up, and no complications were seen.

Conclusions

The "Bharat" Protocol to arrest keratectasia progression and improve corneal regularity is a safe and efficacious alternative as a keratoconus management option. This is the first such study on Nidek Platform for the same.

Three-years outcomes of simultaneous photorefractive surgery and customized corneal cross-linking for keratoconus

PURPOSE

To report the efficacy of customized cross-linking (CXL) in halting progression of keratoconus when combined with photorefractive procedures.

METHODS

Seven eyes from 7 patients with documented progressive keratoconus were treated with customized CXL (customized ultraviolet-A irradiance pattern centered on the maximum posterior elevation with total energy levels ranging from 5.4 up to 10 J/cm2 , and an energy fluence of 9 mW/cm2) combined with photorefractive procedures. Four patients underwent simultaneous transepithelial photorefractive keratectomy (T-PRK) plus customized CXL, and three patients underwent simultaneous transepithelial phototherapeutic keratectomy (T-PTK) plus customized CXL. Tomographic parameters (Kmax, pachymetry of the thinnest point and maximal elevation of posterior float and regularization index) and best spectacle-corrected visual acuity (BSCVA) were compared preoperatively and 3 years postoperatively.

RESULTS

All eyes showed a decrease in the maximal curvature Kmax, and none of eyes showed progression. Six eyes showed a flattening of 3 or more diopters (D). On average, Kmax decreased by - 4.8 ± 2.5 D, and the BSCVA improved by 0.04 ± 0.07 logarithm of the minimal angle of resolution. The mean value of regularization index was 8.7 ± 3.8 D. Mild corneal haze occurred in two eyes, and superficial apical scar occurred in one eye. None of the eyes had a vision-threatening complication.

CONCLUSION

Customized CXL combined with photorefractive procedure (T-PRK/T-PTK) resulted in long lasting flattening effect and strong regularization of keratoconic corneas along with improvement of BSCVA over a 3-year follow-up.

Three-Year Results of Simultaneous Transepithelial Phototherapeutic Keratectomy and Conventional Photorefractive Keratectomy (Cretan Protocol Plus) Followed by Corneal Crosslinking for Keratoconus

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to present the 3-year outcomes after simultaneous transepithelial phototherapeutic keratectomy (t-PTK) and conventional photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) followed by corneal crosslinking (CXL) for keratoconus.

METHODS

In this prospective, interventional case series, patients with progressive keratoconus underwent simultaneous t-PTK and conventional PRK followed by CXL (Cretan protocol plus). Visual, refractive, and topographic outcomes were evaluated along with endothelial cell density (ECD) preoperatively and at 1, 2, and 3 years postoperatively.

RESULTS

Twenty-two patients (31 eyes) were enrolled. No intraoperative or postoperative complications were observed in any of the patients. Logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR) mean uncorrected and mean corrected distance visual acuity improved from 0.81 ± 0.40 and 0.18 ± 0.21 preoperatively to 0.38 ± 0.33 ( P < 0.001) and 0.06 ± 0.12 ( P < 0.001) at 3-year follow-up. Mean spherical equivalent improved from -5.39 ± 3.89 diopters (D) preoperatively to -2.29 ± 2.65 D ( P < 0.001) at 3 years postoperatively. Mean corneal astigmatism reduced from -4.70 ± 2.86 D preoperatively to -3.55 ± 2.45 D ( P = 0.001) at 3 years postoperatively. No ECD alterations were observed throughout the 3-year follow-up ( P > 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Simultaneous t-PTK and conventional PRK followed by CXL seems to be an effective and safe treatment for progressive keratoconus over 3-year follow-up.

Toric Implantable Phakic Contact Lens in the Correction of Stable Keratoconus after Corneal Collagen Crosslinking

Background:

The study aims to evaluate the safety profile and efficacy of toric Implantable Phakic Contact Lens (IPCL) in patients with stable keratoconus after corneal collagen crosslinking (CXL).

Methods:

A prospective interventional case series study involving 30 keratoconic eyes between 22 to 39 years of age implanted with toric IPCL 6 months after CXL. The refractive error, visual acuity, corneal endothelium, intraocular pressure (IOP), and adverse effects were observed for 12 months following the implantation.

Results:

The preoperative mean for the sphere was approximately -8.3±3.6, which improved postoperatively by -0.58±0.23 after 1 month, -0.48±0.19 after 3 months, -0.36±0.18 after 6 months, and -0.35±0.2 after 12 months respectively. About the cylinder, the preoperative mean for the cylinder was approximately -3.4±1.6, which improved postoperatively by -1.06±0.3 after 1 month, -0.76±0.19 after 3 months, -0.48±0.28 after 6 months and -0.53±0.12 after 12 months, respectively. The preoperative BCDVA was 0.34±0.13, which increased postoperatively to 0.18±0.11 after 12 months. The mean values for IOP were 14.5±1.5 mm Hg, 15.1±2.09 mm Hg, 13.8±2.2 mmHg, 13.3±1.7 mm Hg, 13.1±1.6 mm Hg at preoperative period, 1 month, 3 months, 6 months and 12 months postoperatively. The mean preoperative endothelial count was 2912.9±111.1 per square millimeter, 2854.7±113.2 cells per square millimeter after 6 months, and 2829.0±112.2 cells per square millimeter after 12 months.

Conclusions:

Toric IPCL is a safe approach for treating residual refractive errors, particularly astigmatism, after 6 months of CXL in patients with stable KCS.

Femtosecond laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis with topography-guided or asphericity-adjusted derived data: a comparative contralateral eye study

Background

Wavefront-optimized laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) ablation is the most commonly performed procedure in refractive surgery, but new technologies have become available. Our goal was to compare topography-guided (Contoura) and asphericity-guided (Custom-Q) customized ablation treatments for the correction of myopia with or without astigmatism.

Methods

This prospective, randomized, double-blind, contralateral eye study included 60 eyes of 30 patients with myopia or myopic astigmatism requiring femtosecond LASIK (FemtoLASIK) treatment. For each patient, one eye was randomized to undergo Contoura treatment, and the other underwent Custom-Q abaltion. Uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA), corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA), manifest refractive spherical equivalent (MRSE), sphere (SPH), cylinder (CYL), 6.0-mm total corneal aberration root mean square (RMS), coma (COMA), trefoil (TREF), and spherical aberration (SA) were measured and analysed after a 1-year follow-up.

Results

The UDVA was − 0.08 ± 0.06 logMAR in Contoura eyes and − 0.08 ± 0.05 logMAR in Custom-Q eyes (p = 0.309) after 12 months. Twenty-five eyes (83%) in the Contoura group and twenty-six eyes (87%) in the Custom-Q group had a UDVA of 20/16 at the end of 12 months, and 100% of eyes in both groups reached a UDVA of 20/25 or better. Ninety and 100% of eyes in the Contoura and Custom-Q groups, respectively, achieved a residual CYL ≤0.50 D (p = 0.237). No statistically significant difference was observed between the surgical techniques in the preoperative to 1-year postoperative changes for any of the parameters evaluated (MRSE, CYL, RMS, DEF, COMA, TREF, and SA).

Conclusions

The Contoura and Custom-Q techniques yielded excellent visual and refractive results, but the evidence did not reveal any clear differences between these two methods after 1 year of follow-up.

Trial registration

ReBEC - Registro Brasileiro de Ensaios Clínicos [Internet]: Rio de Janeiro (RJ): Instituto de Informação Científica e Tecnológica em Saúde (Brazil); 2010 -. Identifier RBR-8rs5kt Myopia and Astigmatism Topography-guided Refractive Surgery by Contoura Method Versus Customized by Asphericity in Contralateral Eyes: A prospective Double blind Randomized Study. Available from https://ensaiosclinicos.gov.br/rg/RBR-8rs5kt

Date of registration: 02/03/2020 ^(dd/mm/yyyy).

CAAE:96778718.9.0000.5192.

Issuing authority: Plataforma Brasil.

CEP:2.979.279.

Issuing authority: HUOC.

Combined photorefractive keratectomy and corneal collagen cross-linking for treatment of keratoconus: a 2-year follow-up study

Background:

Corneal collagen cross-linking (CXL) is considered an effective procedure for slowing down or eliminating the progression of keratoconus. New techniques, in combination with CXL, have been proposed to stop the evolution of keratoconus and improve the visual function.

Objective:

To evaluate the effectiveness of combined photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) with mitomycin-C (MMC) application and CXL in the management of grade 1–2 keratoconus over a 2-year follow-up.

Methods:

Fifteen eyes underwent topography-guided PRK with 0.02% MMC application immediately followed by standard CXL.

Results:

Best corrected visual acuity improved from 0.15 ± 0.11 logMAR to 0.08 ± 0.09 logMAR at 24 months (p < 0.0001) in treated eyes. Mean steepest meridian keratometry reduced from 48.79 ± 3.22 D at baseline to 46.16 ± 3.11 D at 24 months (p < 0.0001). Mean flattest meridian keratometry reduced from 45.18 ± 2.17 D preoperatively to 44.35 ± 2.19 D at 24 months (p < 0.0001).

Conclusion:

Simultaneous topography-guided PRK with MMC 0.02% application and standard CXL is a safe, promising and effective procedure in the treatment of mild and moderate keratoconus.

Epithelial photorefractive keratectomy vs mechanical epithelial removal followed by corneal crosslinking for keratoconus: the Tel-Aviv Protocol

PURPOSE

To compare the Tel-Aviv Protocol, epithelial photorefractive keratectomy (ePRK) combined with corneal crosslinking (CXL), to CXL with alcohol-assisted epithelial removal (Alc-CXL) for progressive keratoconus.

SETTING

Care-Vision Laser Centers, Tel Aviv, Israel.

DESIGN

Retrospective study.

METHODS

All patients underwent Alc-CXL or ePRK, a 50 μm laser ablation of the epithelium with a myopic spherical component and an astigmatic component, followed by CXL. All patients completed at least 1 year of follow-up.

RESULTS

A total of 131 eyes of 131 patients were included in the study. Fifty patients (38%) were included in the Tel-Aviv Protocol group, and 81 patients (62%) were included in the Alc-CXL group. There was a significant improvement in uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA) (from 1.22 ± 0.75 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution [logMAR] to 0.49 ± 0.44 logMAR, P < .001), corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA) (from 0.29 ± 0.17 logMAR to 0.16 ± 0.12 logMAR, P < .001), Kmax (from 48.50 ± 3.00 diopters [D] to 46.50 ± 3.00 D, P < .001), and cylinder (from -3.31 ± 1.70 D to -2.32 ± 1.66 D, P < .001) in the Tel-Aviv Protocol group in comparison with nonsignificant changes in the Alc-CXL group in UDVA (from 0.89 ± 0.62 logMAR to 0.81 ± 0.65 logMAR, P = .23), CDVA (from 0.25 ± 0.21 logMAR to 0.21 ± 0.17 logMAR, P = .10), Kmax (from 46.50 ± 4.50 D to 46.00 ± 4.40 D, P = .08), and cylinder (from -2.99 ± 2.05 D to -2.80 ± 1.75 D, P = .39) at the end of the follow-up period.

CONCLUSIONS

The Tel-Aviv Protocol for progressive keratoconus patients provided good improvement in visual acuity and astigmatism while halting the progression of keratoconus.

Selective transepithelial ablation with simultaneous accelerated Corneal Cross-linking for corneal regularization of keratoconus: the STARE-X Protocol

Purpose

To evaluate the changes in refractive outcomes and corneal aberrations in central and paracentral keratoconus after Selective transepithelial topography-guided photorefractive keratectomy combined with Accelerated Corneal Collagen Cross-Linking (STARE-X).

Settings

Centro polispecialistico Mediterraneo, Siena Crosslinking Center and University of Messina (Italy).

Design

Prospective, interventional, multi-centric study.

Methods

One hundred eyes of 100 patients underwent STARE-X protocol. Patients were subdivided into 2 groups: Group 1 with cone located within the central 3-mm zone (50 eyes); and Group 2 (50 eyes) with cone located outside the central 3-mm zone. Follow-up was two years at least for all eyes. Outcome parameters included uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA) and corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA). Corneal tomography and corneal wavefront aberrations were assessed and compared before and two years after the treatment.

Results

At 2 years UDVA, CDVA improved, as well as sphere, cylinder, K-max reduced after treatment in both groups (p<.001 respectively). Moreover, a statistically significant reduction was observed of total High-Order Aberrations Root Main Square (HOA RMS), Coma RMS and Spherical Aberration (SA RMS) in both groups (p<.001 respectively). However, CDVA improved more in Group 1 than in Group 2 (p<.02).

Conclusion

The STARE-X protocol demonstrated effective results in halting keratoconus progression and improving corneal regularity with a safe and effective profile. STARE-X improved both visual acuity and corneal aberration at 2 years. Longer follow-up studies are warranted to observe further long-term CXL flattening effect on the cone.

Comparison of accelerated CXL alone, accelerated CXL-ICRS, and accelerated CXL-TG-PRK in progressive keratoconus and other corneal ectasias

PURPOSE

To compare accelerated corneal crosslinking (CXL) alone, CXL with simultaneous intrastromal corneal ring segments (CXL-ICRS), and CXL with simultaneous topography-guided photorefractive keratectomy (CXL-TG-PRK) in progressive keratoconus, pellucid marginal degeneration (PMD), or laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK)-induced ectasia.

SETTING

The Kensington Eye Institute and Bochner Eye Institute, Toronto, Canada.

DESIGN

Prospective nonrandomized interventional study.

METHODS

Visual and topographical outcomes using a comparative analysis adjusting for preoperative maximum keratometry (Kmax) were evaluated 1 year postoperatively.

RESULTS

Four hundred fifty-two eyes from 375 patients with progressive keratoconus, PMD, or LASIK-induced ectasia that underwent accelerated (9 mW/cm, 10 minutes) CXL alone (n = 204), CXL-ICRS (n = 126), or CXL-TG-PRK (n = 122) were included. Change in logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution uncorrected distance visual acuity was significant with CXL-ICRS (-0.31; 95% CI, -0.38 to -0.24) and CXL-TG-PRK (-0.16; 95% CI, -0.24 to -0.09), but not with CXL alone. No significant differences in change were found between the 3 groups. Change in corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA) was significant in all 3 groups: -0.12 (95% CI, -0.15 to -0.10) with CXL alone, -0.23 (95% CI, -0.27 to -0.20) with CXL-ICRS, and -0.17 (95% CI, -0.21 to -0.13) with CXL-TG-PRK. Improvement in CDVA was greater with CXL-ICRS than with CXL alone (-0.08 ± 0.02; P < .0001) and CXL-TG-PRK (-0.05 ± 0.02; P = .005). Change in Kmax was significant with CXL-ICRS [-3.21 diopters (D); 95% CI, -3.98 to -2.45] and CXL-TG-PRK (-3.69 D; 95% CI, -4.49 to -2.90), but not with CXL alone (-0.05 D; 95% CI, -0.66 to 0.55).

CONCLUSIONS

CXL alone might be best for keratoconic patients who meet the inclusion criteria. CXL-ICRS might be more effective for eyes with more irregular astigmatism and worse CDVA and CXL-TG-PRK for eyes requiring improvements in irregular astigmatism but still have good CDVA.

[Excimer laser in keratoconus management]

Visual rehabilitation in keratoconus is a challenge, notably because of the significant irregular astigmatism and optical aberrations that it induces. Many surgical techniques have been developed in addition to, or in the case of failure of, spectacles and rigid gas permeable contact lenses: intracorneal ring segments, intraocular lenses, excimer laser and, as a last resort, keratoplasty. Excimer laser photoablates the cornea, allowing remodeling of its surface. There are various treatment modes (wavefront-optimized, wavefront-guided and topography-guided), allowing performance of a customized treatment if needed. Its use in keratoconus has been described since the 2000s, alone or in combination with other procedures. For example, the combination of photoablation and corneal cross linking, a technique that increases corneal rigidity and in so doing can slow or even stop the progression of keratoconus, proved its efficacy and safety in many studies, and various protocols have been described. A triple procedure, including intracorneal ring segments, excimer laser and cross linking, has also given some very promising results in progressive keratoconus, providing a significative improvement in visual acuity and topographic data. The combination of excimer laser and intraocular lenses remains a poorly explored lead that might provide some satisfactory results. The objective of this review is to summarize the recent data on excimer laser in keratoconus management.

Corneal cross-linking (CXL) combined with refractive surgery for the comprehensive management of keratoconus: CXL plus

The past two decades have witnessed an unprecedented evolution in the management of keratoconus that demands a holistic approach comprising of inhibiting the ectatic progression as well as visual rehabilitation. The advent of corneal cross-linking (CXL) in the late 1990s resulted in long-term stabilization of the ectatic cornea along with limited reduction in corneal steepening and regularization of corneal curvature. However, CXL as a standalone procedure does not suffice in rehabilitating the functional vision especially in patients who are unwilling or intolerant towards contact lenses. The concept of “CXL plus” was proposed which incorporates adjunctive use of refractive procedures with CXL in order to overcome the optical inefficiency due to corneal irregularity, decrease the irregular astigmatism, correct the residual refractive error and improve functional visual outcome in keratoconus. Several refractive procedures such as conductive keratoplasty (CK), photorefractive keratectomy (PRK), transepithelial phototherapeutic keratectomy (t-PTK), intrastromal corneal ring segments (ICRS) implantation, phakic intraocular lens (PIOL) implantation and multiple other techniques have been combined with CXL to optimize and enhance the CXL outcome. This review aimed to summarize the different protocols of CXL plus, provide guidelines for selection of the optimum CXL plus technique and aid in decision-making for the comprehensive management of cases with primary keratoconus in addition to discussing the future and scope for innovations in the existing treatment protocols.

Topography-guided treatment in regular and irregular corneas

Over the last decade, refractive surgery has been revolutionized by advancements in ablation profiles, available for the treatment of both regular and irregular corneas. Advances in corneal imaging have helped highlight the presence of higher-order aberrations, the correction of which could result in a better quality of vision. Topographic measurements being static are more repeatable and pupil independent and therefore provide the ideal platform for correction of both lower and higher-order aberrations and could result in improved visual quality even in patients with seemingly regular corneas. The combination of topography-guided treatment with collagen cross-linking has further increased the scope of treating irregular corneas like keratoconus, post-laser in-situ keratomileusis ectasia, and pellucid marginal degeneration. This review delves into the current literature and guidelines available for the topographic treatment of regular and irregular corneas.

High-Resolution Wavefront-Guided Photorefractive Keratectomy and Accelerated Corneal Crosslinking for Stabilization and Visual Rehabilitation of Keratoconus Eyes

PURPOSE

To evaluate the visual and refractive outcomes after high-resolution wavefront-guided (HRWG) surface ablation with corneal crosslinking (CXL) in keratoconus eyes.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

In this prospective, interventional case series, 47 eyes of 28 progressive keratoconus patients older than age 18 were enrolled. All patients underwent HRWG photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) with simultaneous accelerated CXL. The study parameters were manifest refraction spherical equivalent (MRSE), keratometric outcomes, uncorrected (UDVA) and corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA) at postoperative 6 and 12 months.

RESULTS

There was improvement in mean MRSE from -2.39±1.89 D preoperatively to -0.13 ± 0.68 D at 12 months, with corresponding improvement in UDVA from 0.77 ± 0.35 logMAR to 0.08 ± 0.12 logMAR and CDVA from 0.10 ± 0.11 logMAR to 0.02 ± 0.04 logMAR. Preoperative flat and steep keratometry (K) were 4wct 32.49 ± 1.67 D and 45.94 ± 2.10 D, respectively, and at postoperative 12 months were 41.36 ± 2.08 D and 42.65 ± 2.78 D, respectively. At postoperative 12 months, visual and refractive outcomes were maintained. Comparisons between preoperative and postoperative 12 month timepoints were statistically significant for all parameters.

CONCLUSION

Simultaneous wavefront-guided PRK followed by CXL is a promising treatment for the visual rehabilitation of keratoconus patients.

Advanced Surface Ablation in Mild (Fruste) Keratoconus: A Case Report

Corneal ectasia is a complication of refractive surgery, and keratoconus is a contraindication to this type of procedure. Surface ablation may be an option for selected cases of mild keratoconus, with patient education being fundamental to this treatment as well as a complete evaluation of the cornea and optical properties of the patient. Here we report the clinical outcome of a patient 15 years after advanced surface ablation in a case of mild (fruste) keratoconus.

Explainable Machine Learning Approach as a Tool to Understand Factors Used to Select the Refractive Surgery Technique on the Expert Level

Purpose

Recently, laser refractive surgery options, including laser epithelial keratomileusis, laser in situ keratomileusis, and small incision lenticule extraction, successfully improved patients' quality of life. Evidence-based recommendation for an optimal surgery technique is valuable in increasing patient satisfaction. We developed an interpretable multiclass machine learning model that selects the laser surgery option on the expert level.

Methods

A multiclass XGBoost model was constructed to classify patients into four categories including laser epithelial keratomileusis, laser in situ keratomileusis, small incision lenticule extraction, and contraindication groups. The analysis included 18,480 subjects who intended to undergo refractive surgery at the B&VIIT Eye center. Training (n = 10,561) and internal validation (n = 2640) were performed using subjects who visited between 2016 and 2017. The model was trained based on clinical decisions of highly experienced experts and ophthalmic measurements. External validation (n = 5279) was conducted using subjects who visited in 2018. The SHapley Additive ex-Planations technique was adopted to explain the output of the XGBoost model.

Results

The multiclass XGBoost model exhibited an accuracy of 81.0% and 78.9% when tested on the internal and external validation datasets, respectively. The SHapley Additive ex-Planations explanations for the results were consistent with prior knowledge from ophthalmologists. The explanation from one-versus-one and one-versus-rest XGBoost classifiers was effective for easily understanding users in the multicategorical classification problem.

Conclusions

This study suggests an expert-level multiclass machine learning model for selecting the refractive surgery for patients. It also provided a clinical understanding in a multiclass problem based on an explainable artificial intelligence technique.

Translational Relevance

Explainable machine learning exhibits a promising future for increasing the practical use of artificial intelligence in ophthalmic clinics.

Accelerated, Pulsed Collagen Cross-Linking versus the Dresden Protocol in Keratoconus: A Case Series

PURPOSE

The aim of our study was to compare the depth of the demarcation line developing in the cornea after the standard Dresden protocol versus the accelerated, pulsed, epithelium-off corneal collagen cross-linking (CXL).

METHODS

This was a nonrandomized, retrospective case series. Patients with progressive keratoconus were treated with either the standard Dresden protocol (Group 1) or accelerated, epithelium-off CXL using the Avedro (Waltham, MA, USA) device (Group 2). The accelerated CXL protocol involved 18 min of pulsed ultraviolet-A (20 mW/cm2, 7.2 J/cm2, pulsed pro-file: 1 s on, 2 s off). The depth of the demarcation line was measured about 3 months postoperatively.

RESULTS

Fifty-nine eyes of 35 subjects were included in the analysis. Group 1 consisted of 19 eyes, and Group 2 of 40 eyes. The mean age of the participants was 22.21 years in Group 1 and 26.55 years in Group 2 (p = 0.184). The mean preoperative K value was 44.89 D in Group 1 and 45.20 D in Group 2 (p = 0.768). The depth of the demarcation line was 322.50 μm in Group 1 and 319.95 μm in Group 2 (p = 0.937).

CONCLUSIONS

The demarcation line depth was not statistically significantly different between the two protocols. The significance of the demarcation line depth has not been fully clarified in the literature. Our results support the contention that these two techniques may have similar structural outcomes and ef-ficacies in the treatment of keratoconus.

Combined transepithelial phototherapeutic keratectomy and conventional photorefractive keratectomy followed simultaneously by corneal crosslinking for keratoconus: Cretan protocol plus

PURPOSE

To evaluate the visual, refractive, and topographic outcomes after combined transepithelial phototherapeutic keratectomy (PTK) and conventional photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) followed simultaneously by corneal crosslinking (CXL) for keratoconus.

SETTING

Vardinoyiannion Eye Institute of Crete, Faculty of Medicine, University of Crete, Heraklion, Crete, Greece.

DESIGN

Prospective case series.

METHODS

Patients with progressive keratoconus had simultaneous conventional PRK followed by CXL; the corneal epithelium was removed using transepithelial PTK (Cretan protocol plus). The visual, refractive, and topographic outcomes and the endothelial cell density (ECD) were evaluated preoperatively and 1, 3, 6, and 12 months postoperatively.

RESULTS

Forty-three patients (55 eyes) were enrolled. The mean uncorrected and corrected distance visual acuities improved significantly from 0.98 ± 0.63 (SD) logarithm of minimum angle of resolution (logMAR) and 0.20 ± 0.23 logMAR preoperatively to 0.39 ± 0.35 logMAR (P < .001) and 0.08 ± 0.16 logMAR (P < .001) 12 months postoperatively, respectively. The mean spherical equivalent improved significantly from -4.67 ± 4.00 diopters (D) preoperatively to -2.24 ± 2.81 D (P < .001) at 12 months. The mean steep keratometry (K) and flat keratometry readings decreased significantly from 50.30 ± 5.00 D and 45.62 ± 3.10 D preoperatively to 46.27 ± 3.90 D (P < .001) and 43.46 ± 3.00 D (P < .001) 12 months postoperatively, respectively. No ECD alterations were observed throughout the follow-up (P > .05).

CONCLUSION

Combined transepithelial PTK and conventional PRK followed simultaneously by CXL was effective in corneal stabilization and vision improvement in keratoconic patients.

Combined Protocols for Corneal Collagen Cross-Linking with Photorefractive Surgery for Refractive Management of Keratoconus: Update on Techniques and Review of Literature

With the development and gradual dissemination of corneal collagen cross-linking (CXL) in the twenty-first century as an early treatment for keratoconus, the management paradigm has shifted to include a greater focus on complete refractive correction for these patients. Though supplemental hard contact lens therapy remains a mainstay of visual rehabilitation in keratoconus, there has been increasing appeal in a completely surgical approach by combining CXL with adjuvant refractive procedures to both halt the ectatic process and enhance functional visual outcomes. Collectively termed "CXL plus" procedures, several combined protocols have been studied to various degrees in conjunction with CXL, involving photorefractive keratectomy (PRK), transepithelial phototherapeutic keratectomy (PTK), conductive keratoplasty (CK), intrastromal corneal ring segments (ICRS) implantation, phakic intraocular lens (PIOL) implantation, or multiple of these techniques together. The scope of this review aims to encompass a summary of current CXL protocols and present the current status of studies involving adjunctive keratorefractive procedures combined with CXL. By discussing the results to date of these CXL plus protocols, we can assess what further areas of investigation are necessary within this field as the next step to optimizing treatment modalities and outcomes for our keratoconus patients, regardless of disease severity.

Haze and Visual Acuity Loss After Sequential Photorefractive Keratectomy and Corneal Cross-linking for Keratoconus

PURPOSE

To investigate the results after photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) followed immediately by standard 30-minute corneal cross-linking (CXL) for keratoconus.

METHODS

This retrospective study included 26 eyes of 16 patients with keratoconus. Uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA), corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA), manifest refraction spherical equivalent (SE) and cylinder, apical keratometry, corneal higher order aberrations (HOAs), and corneal haze were evaluated.

RESULTS

Mean follow-up was 32 ± 8 months (range: 19 to 50 months) and mean patient age was 31 ± 5 years (range: 24 to 40 years). Mean UDVA improved significantly from 0.80 ± 0.39 to 0.32 ± 0.36 logMAR after surgery (P < .001), but the mean CDVA worsened significantly from 0.07 ± 0.09 to 0.15 ± 0.14 logMAR after surgery (P = .006). Thirteen eyes (50%) lost at least one line of CDVA, 3 eyes (12%) lost two lines, and 4 eyes (15%) lost three lines. SE, cylinder, and apical keratometry decreased significantly. Corneal haze grade 1 was found in 15 eyes (57.7%), grade 2 in 6 eyes (23.1%), and grade 3 in 1 eye (3.8%). A significant correlation was seen between postoperative CDVA loss and corneal haze (P = .001) and history of atopy (P < .01), but not with corneal HOA change.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite an improvement in UDVA and topographic values, the loss of CDVA, explained by postoperative haze, demonstrates that this procedure should be approached with caution, may not be as safe as initially thought, especially in patients with atopy and can cause severe visual acuity loss. [J Refract Surg. 2019;35(2):109-114.].

Management of Corneal Ectasia after LASIK with Phototherapeutic Keratectomy Combined with Photorefractive Keratectomy and Collagen Cross-Linking

Background

To evaluate the efficacy of phototherapeutic keratectomy (PTK) combined with photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) and riboflavin with ultraviolet-A collagen cross-linking (CXL), performed sequentially on the same day, in the management of corneal ectasia after LASIK.

Methods

This retrospective review comprised consecutive patients with corneal ectasia after LASIK. The patients were administered PTK and PRK on the previous corneal flap, and CXL was given on the same day by the same surgeon. The main outcome measures included age, sex, uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA), corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA), spherical equivalent refraction, cylinder equivalent refraction, steep and flat keratometries (K), central corneal thickness (CCT), endothelial cell count, corneal haze, and ectasia stability. Mean follow-up period was 6, 12, and 24 months.

Results

Sixteen eyes of twelve patients were included in the study. Twenty-four months after administration of PTK combined with PRK and CXL, a significant improvement in UDVA was observed. Mean cylinder equivalent refraction was significantly reduced at 6, 12, and 24 months postoperatively. However, no significant reduction was observed in spherical equivalent refraction. A significant reduction in the flat K and steep K values was observed. No significant change in mean CCT value was observed. Mean endothelial cell count and morphology were unchanged between preoperative and postoperative patients. In addition, no obvious corneal haze was observed.

Conclusions

PTK combined with PRK and CXL on the same day is a safe and effective treatment in improving visual acuity in selected patients with corneal ectasia after LASIK.

Femtosecond Laser-Assisted Stromal Lenticule Addition Keratoplasty for the Treatment of Advanced Keratoconus: A Preliminary Study

PURPOSE

To investigate the in vivo effect of a novel femtosecond laser-assisted procedure termed stromal lenticule addition keratoplasty for advanced keratoconus.

METHODS

Ten patients with stage III and IV stable keratoconus were included. Negative meniscus-shaped stromal lenticules were produced from corneoscleral eye bank buttons with a refractive lenticule extraction procedure with a 500-kHz VisuMax femtosecond laser (Carl Zeiss Meditec, Jena, Germany). Recipient corneas underwent a modified femtosecond laser flap-cut procedure to produce an intrastromal pocket and lenticules were implanted. Patients were followed up for 6 months after surgery with determination of uncorrected (UDVA) and corrected (CDVA) distance visual acuity, subjective refraction and topographic corneal curvature changes, anterior segment optical coherence tomography (AS-OCT), and in vivo confocal microscopy.

RESULTS

Comparison of preoperative and 6-month postoperative UDVA and CDVA showed statistically significant improvements (P = .024 and .007, respectively) from 1.58 ± 0.36 to 1.22 ± 0.37 and from 1.07 ± 0.17 to 0.70 ± 0.23 logMAR. Eight of 10 eyes showed an improvement in UDVA (P < .001) that ranged between one and three lines, whereas all but one eye presented improved CDVA. Corneal topography documented a decrease between preoperative and 6-month postoperative anterior mean curvature (AVG-K at 3 mm) and anterior Q values (P = .005). AS-OCT showed a significant increase in thickness of the central and mid-peripheral cornea produced by the lenticule implantation (P = .005).

CONCLUSIONS

The stromal lenticule addition keratoplasty procedure was clinically efficient in improving the corneal shape and vision in patients with keratoconus. Negative meniscus-shaped lenticule addition induced a flattening of the cone while increasing corneal thickness. [J Refract Surg. 2018;34(1):36-44.].

A Review of Corneal Collagen Cross-linking - Current Trends in Practice Applications

Objective:

To review the literature on current applications of corneal Collagen Cross-Linking (CXL).

Methods:

A review of publications on corneal cross-linking was conducted. This included systemic reviews, randomized controlled clinical trials, cohort studies, case-controlled studies and case series. A summary of the publications is tabulated.

Results:

The original indication of riboflavin – Ultraviolet-A (UVA) induced corneal collagen cross-linking is to arrest the progression of keratoconus. Studies show that it is effective in arresting the progression of keratoconus and post-LASIK ectasia with the standard Dresden protocol (epithelium-off). There are also improvements in visual, keratometric and topographic measurements over time. Severe complications of cross-linking are rare. The epithelium-on techniques have less efficacy than the Dresden protocol. Accelerated protocols have variable results, with some studies reporting comparable outcomes to the Dresden protocol while other studies reporting less efficacious outcomes. Cross-linking combined with refractive procedures provide better visual outcome but long term studies are warranted. Cross-linking for the treatment of infective keratitis is a promising new treatment modality. Initial studies show that it is more effective for superficial rather than deep infections and for bacterial rather than fungal infections.

Conclusions:

Corneal cross-linking is a procedure with an expanding list of indications from the treatment of corneal ectasias to infective keratitis. While the standard Dresden protocol is established as the gold standard treatment for progressive keratoconus, the more recent protocols may require further refinements, investigative and long-term studies.

Medium- to Long-Term Results of Corneal Cross-Linking for Keratoconus Using Phototherapeutic Keratectomy for Epithelial Removal and Partial Stromal Ablation

PURPOSE

To evaluate the medium- to long-term outcomes of corneal cross-linking in treatment of keratoconus using transepithelial phototherapeutic keratectomy (PTK-CXL) for epithelial removal and partial stromal ablation to stabilize the cornea, reduce corneal irregularity, and improve corrected vision.

METHODS

Retrospective analysis of 46 keratoconic eyes that underwent PTK-CXL. Corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA), manifest refraction, steep and flat simulated keratometry (Kmax and Kmin), corneal irregularity index (IRI), corneal higher order aberrations (HOAs), epithelial thickness profile, and corneal biomechanical characteristics were evaluated preoperatively and postoperatively.

RESULTS

At a mean follow-up time of 21.0 ± 7.6 months (range: 10 to 43 months) postoperatively, CDVA improved from 0.25 ± 0.24 to 0.18 ± 0.22 logMAR (P = .002). CDVA remained unchanged in 32.6% (15 eyes) and 56.5% (26 eyes) gained up to five Snellen lines of CDVA, whereas 6.5% (3 eyes) lost two or more lines of CDVA, respectively. Postoperatively, flattening of Kmax from 50.58 ± 5.26 to 48.96 ± 4.00 diopters (D) and Kmin from 45.80 ± 3.11 to 44.77 ± 2.63 D (P < .001), reduction of IRI from 49.7 ± 24.5 to 43.4 ± 21.4 µm (P = .002), decrease of root mean square HOAs (at 5-mm diameter) from 2.66 ± 1.31 to 2.37 ± 1.37 µm (P = .037), and slight thickening of corneal epithelium were registered, whereas most of the corneal biomechanical measurements did not show statistically significant change. Two eyes demonstrated slight topographic regression.

CONCLUSIONS

PTK-CXL seems to be effective in arresting the progression of keratoconus, improving CDVA, flattening the cornea, regularizing corneal surface, and reducing corneal HOAs. [J Refract Surg. 2017;33(7):488-495.].

5-year follow-up of combined non-topography guided photorefractive keratectomy and corneal collagen cross linking for keratoconus

AIM

To evaluate the visual outcomes of simultaneous non-topography guided photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) and corneal collagen cross-linking (CXL) in eyes with keratoconus 5y after the procedure.

METHODS

Prospective, interventional, non-randomized, and non-controlled case series design was used. Sixty eyes of 30 patients (16 males and 14 females; age: 21-41y) with mild, non-progressive (stages 1-2) keratoconus were enrolled. Refraction, uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA) and corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA), flat and steep keratometry readings, and adverse events were evaluated preoperatively and postoperatively. Data were collected preoperatively and postoperatively at 3mo, 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5y follow-up visits after combined non-topography-guided PRK with CXL was performed. All patients had at least 5y of follow-up.

RESULTS

All study parameters showed a statistically significant improvement at 5y over baseline values. The mean follow-up time was 68.20±4.71mo (range: 60-106mo). Patients showed a significant improvement in UDVA from 1.24±0.79 logMAR prior to combined non-TG-PRK+CXL to 0.06±0.15 logMAR postoperatively at the time of their last follow-up visit. CDVA significantly increased from 0.06±0.19 logMAR preoperatively to 0.03±0.12 logMAR postoperatively. A significant decrease in the mean spherical equivalent (SE) refraction was observed from -2.28±1.8 to -0.79±0.93 diopters (D) (P<0.05), and the manifest sphere decreased from -1.62±1.23 to -0.27±0.21 D (P=0.001). The manifest cylinder significantly decreased from -1.73±0.86 to -0.29±0.34 D postoperatively (P=0.001). The mean steep keratometry was 45.13±1.32 vs 47.28±2.12 D preoperatively (P<0.05), and the preoperative mean steepest keratometry (Kmax) 48.6±3.1 was reduced significantly to 46.8±2.9 postoperatively (P<0.05).

CONCLUSION

Combined non-TG-PRK with 15min CXL is an effective and safe option for correcting mild refractive error and improving visual acuity in patients with mild stable keratoconus.

Visual rehabilitation in moderate keratoconus: combined corneal wavefront-guided transepithelial photorefractive keratectomy and high-fluence accelerated corneal collagen cross-linking after intracorneal ring segment implantation

Background

To investigate the effects of combined corneal wavefront-guided transepithelial photorefractive keratectomy (tPRK) and accelerated corneal collagen cross-linking (CXL) after intracorneal ring segment (ICRS) implantation in patients with moderate keratoconus.

Methods

Medical records of 23 eyes of 23 patients undergoing combined tPRK and CXL after ICRS implantation were retrospectively analyzed. Uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA), corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA), manifest refraction spherical equivalent (MRSE), corneal indices based on Scheimpflug tomography, higher-order aberrations (HOAs), and corneal biomechanical properties were evaluated before and after ICRS implantation, and at 1, 3, and 6 months after combined tPRK and CXL.

Results

There were significant improvements in final logMAR UDVA and logMAR CDVA, and reductions in sphere, MRSE, and all corneal indices from baseline. Significant improvements in logMAR UDVA and reductions in sphere, MRSE, maximal keratometry, keratometry at the apex, mean keratometry, and keratoconus index were noted after ICRS implantation. After tPRK and CXL, significant improvements in logMAR UDVA and logMAR CDVA, and reductions in cylinder and all corneal indices were observed. There were significant improvements in final root mean square HOAs and coma aberrations from baseline, but no changes from baseline after ICRS implantation. Significant reductions in final radius and deformation amplitude from baseline were noted.

Conclusions

Combined tPRK and accelerated CXL after ICRS implantation in moderate keratoconus appears to be a safe and effective treatment, providing an improvement in visual acuity, corneal indices, and HOAs.

Trial registration

retrospectively registered (identification no. NCT03355430). Date registered: 28/11/2017.

Surgical Options for the Refractive Correction of Keratoconus: Myth or Reality

Keratoconus provides a decrease of quality of life to the patients who suffer from it. The treatment used as well as the method to correct the refractive error of these patients may influence on the impact of the disease on their quality of life. The purpose of this review is to describe the evidence about the conservative surgical treatment for keratoconus aiming to therapeutic and refractive effect. The visual rehabilitation for keratoconic corneas requires addressing three concerns: halting the ectatic process, improving corneal shape, and minimizing the residual refractive error. Cross-linking can halt the disease progression, intrastromal corneal ring segments can improve the corneal shape and hence the visual quality and reduce the refractive error, PRK can correct mild-moderate refractive error, and intraocular lenses can correct from low to high refractive error associated with keratoconus. Any of these surgical options can be performed alone or combined with the other techniques depending on what the case requires. Although it could be considered that the surgical option for the refracto-therapeutic treatment of the keratoconus is a reality, controlled, randomized studies with larger cohorts and longer follow-up periods are needed to determine which refractive procedure and/or sequence are most suitable for each case.

Flattening effect of corneal cross-linking depends on the preoperative severity of keratoconus

A retrospective observational study was conducted to validate the effect of corneal cross-linking (CXL) on eyes with progressing keratoconus, depending on severity.In total, 45 eyes of 33 patients (age: 23.9 ± 6.8 years, range: 14-42 years) with progressive keratoconus who underwent CXL were enrolled. Examinations were performed at pre-, 1, 3, 6, and 12 months after surgery. In addition to a slit lamp microscopy, measurement of visual acuity, the steepest keratometric value (Kmax), the thinnest corneal thickness (TCT), and the corneal endothelial cell density (ECD) were assessed. Change in Kmax (ΔKmax) was calculated by subtracting the preoperative Kmax from the 12-month postoperative Kmax.CDVA, TCT, and ECD did not change significantly throughout the follow-up period. Kmax was 56.4 ± 7.2 D preoperatively and 54.3 ± 5.6 D at 12 months after CXL (P = .174). The average value of ΔKmax was -2.23 ± 4.31 D at 12 months after CXL. ΔKmax was negatively correlated with preoperative Kmax (ρ = -0.5517, P = .0001), and positively correlated with preoperative TCT (ρ = 0.4791, P = .0012). However, no correlation was observed between Kmax and patient age or the decrease ratio of ECD.The more flattening was obtained after CXL in cases with the more advanced keratoconus. No complication, including corneal endothelial damage, was observed even in advanced cases.

Keratoconus Treatment Algorithm

Keratoconus management has significantly changed over the last two decades. The advent of new interventions such as cornea cross-linking, intrastromal corneal ring segments, and combined treatments provide corneal clinicians a variety of treatment options for the visual rehabilitation of keratoconus patients. This review summarizes current evidence for these treatments and highlights their place in keratoconus management while new promising emerging therapies are being investigated.

Simultaneous Topography-Guided Photorefractive Keratectomy and Accelerated Corneal Collagen Cross-Linking for Keratoconus

PURPOSE

To study the evolution of visual and refractive outcomes through the first year after simultaneous topography-guided photorefractive keratectomy (t-PRK) and corneal collagen cross-linking (CXL) in keratoconus.

METHODS

This retrospective case series included 85 eyes of 66 patients with a mean age of 26.3 ± 5.7 years, which underwent simultaneous t-PRK with accelerated CXL. Patients were examined for uncorrected distance visual acuity and corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA), flat and steep keratometry readings, and manifest refraction spherical equivalent at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months.

RESULTS

At 12 months, all study parameters demonstrated a statistically significant improvement with uncorrected distance visual acuity 0.46 ± 0.49 logMAR (vs. 0.86 ± 0.39 logMAR preoperatively), CDVA 0.11 ± 0.12 logMAR (vs. 0.41 ± 0.27 logMAR preoperatively), manifest refraction spherical equivalent -2.80 ± 4.47 D (vs. -4.51 ± 4.68 D preoperatively), flat keratometry 43.84 ± 3.24 D (vs. 44.61 ± 3.12 D preoperatively), and steep keratometry 46.05 ± 3.94 D (vs. 48.10 ± 3.68 D preoperatively). Although 90.6% eyes gained 1 or more lines of CDVA, no eyes lost any lines of CDVA. In all, 37.6% of the eyes demonstrated an improvement of 4 or more lines of CDVA with a maximum improvement of 11 lines of CDVA in 1 eye.

CONCLUSIONS

Simultaneous t-PRK with accelerated CXL improved the spherocylindrical refraction and visual function of keratoconus eyes, and the outcomes were stable through 12 months' follow-up. Future studies with longer follow-up and larger data set are necessary to validate the results of the current study and evaluate the long-term safety and efficacy.

Simultaneous versus Sequential Accelerated Corneal Collagen Cross-Linking and Wave Front Guided PRK for Treatment of Keratoconus: Objective and Subjective Evaluation

Aim. To compare objective and subjective outcome after simultaneous wave front guided (WFG) PRK and accelerated corneal cross-linking (CXL) in patients with progressive keratoconus versus sequential WFG PRK 6 months after CXL. Methods. 62 eyes with progressive keratoconus were divided into two groups; the first including 30 eyes underwent simultaneous WFG PRK with accelerated CXL. The second including 32 eyes underwent subsequent WFG PRK performed 6 months later after accelerated CXL. Visual, refractive, topographic, and aberrometric data were determined preoperatively and during 1-year follow-up period and the results compared in between the 2 studied groups. Results. All evaluated visual, refractive, and aberrometric parameters demonstrated highly significant improvement in both studied groups (all P < 0.001). A significant improvement was observed in keratometric and Q values. The improvement in all parameters was stable till the end of follow-up. Likewise, no significant difference was determined in between the 2 groups in any of recorded parameters. Subjective data revealed similarly significant improvement in both groups. Conclusions. WFG PRK and accelerated CXL is an effective and safe option to improve the vision in mild to moderate keratoconus. In one-year follow-up, there is no statistically significant difference between the simultaneous and sequential procedure.

Impact of corneal cross-linking combined with photorefractive keratectomy on blurring strength

Purpose

The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of corneal cross-linking combined with photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) on blurring strength.

Methods

A total of 63 patients with keratoconus were recruited for this study, and two study groups were formed according to the therapeutic intervention: corneal collagen cross-linking (CxL) group (33 patients) received corneal cross-linking according to the Dresden protocol, while the rest additionally received topography-guided photorefractive keratectomy (tCxL). The impact of surgical procedure on blurring strength was assessed by power vector analysis. Potential association between blurring strength and vision-specific quality of life was assessed using the National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire (NEI-VFQ) 25 instrument.

Results

Blurring strength presented excellent correlation with NEI-VFQ scores both preoperatively and postoperatively (all P<0.01). Both groups demonstrated nonsignificant changes in best-corrected visual acuity; however, only the tCxL group had significant reduction in blurring strength (13.48+10.86 [preoperative], 4.26+7.99 [postoperative], P=0.042).

Conclusion

Only the combined treatment (tCxL) resulted in significant reduction in blurring strength. Moreover, the excellent correlation of blurring strength with NEI-VFQ scores indicates its reliability as an index of self-reported quality of life in keratoconus, since it seems to address the nonsignificant changes in best-corrected visual acuity following CxL treatments that are conceived as subjective improvement by the patient.

Long-Term Comparison of Simultaneous Topography-Guided Photorefractive Keratectomy Followed by Corneal Cross-linking versus Corneal Cross-linking Alone

PURPOSE

To compare the results of corneal collagen cross-linking (CXL) alone with combined simultaneous topography-guided photorefractive keratectomy plus CXL (tPRK-CXL) for progressive keratoconus for a 3-year interval.

DESIGN

Prospective, comparative interventional case series.

PARTICIPANTS

Forty-eight patients (60 eyes) with progressive keratoconus.

METHODS

Thirty eyes underwent combined tPRK with a solid-state laser (maximum ablation depth, 50 μm) followed by CXL, and 30 eyes underwent CXL alone. Groups were matched in terms of age and keratoconus stage.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA), uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA), keratometry, and corneal confocal microscopy.

RESULTS

Mean follow up was 39±11 months. Mean age at operation was 28±5.82 years. Before surgery, average CDVA in the tPRK-CXL group was 0.26±0.17 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR), and in the CXL group was 0.24±0.18 logMAR (P = 0.58). At last follow-up, CDVA was 0.09±0.10 logMAR in the tPRK-CXL group and 0.15±0.12 logMAR in the CXL group (P < 0.05). In both groups, no patient lost more than 2 lines of Snellen visual acuity, whereas 19 eyes and 8 eyes in the tPRK-CXL group and in the CXL group, respectively, gained 2 or more lines of CDVA. Before surgery, average UDVA was 0.83±0.54 logMAR in the tPRK-CXL group and 0.86±0.62 logMAR in the CXL group (P = 0.79). At last follow-up, UDVA was 0.27±0.25 logMAR in the tPRK-CXL group and 0.69±0.58 logMAR in the CXL group (P < 0.001). Before surgery, steep and flat keratometry had no significant differences between groups, and at last follow-up, both steep and flat keratometry readings were significantly flatter in the tPRK-CXL group compared with the CXL group. Depth of CXL treatment, as evaluated by confocal microscopy, was 269.8±31.8 μm in the CXL group and 299.7±29.8 μm in the tPRK-CXL group (P < 0.001). No differences were found in endothelial cell density.

CONCLUSIONS

Simultaneous tPRK followed by CXL in this series of keratoconus patients offered significantly improved vision to treated patients in comparison with CXL alone, and similar results regarding postoperative stability. Safety concerns regarding corneal thickness were taken into account in treatment planning.

[Corneal collagen cross-linking for keratoconus]

Over the last decade, corneal collagen cross-linking (CXL) has become a conventional treatment method for progressive keratoconus. Laboratory studies have shown that CXL increases the diameter of collagen fibers and also the number of intra- and interfibrillar cross-links, thus, increasing biomechanical strength of the irradiated cornea. As confirmed by a series of clinical and randomized controlled trials, CXL is able to slow down and, perhaps, to stop the progression of keratoconus. In most post-CXL patients visual acuity improves, while keratometric readings, spherical equivalent, and higher order aberrations reduce. Although published results prove CXL effective in the treatment of progressive keratoconus, its late consequences are yet unknown. This article reviews the stages of CXL development and results of published experimental and clinical studies. Prospects for CXL modifications that do not require epithelial debridement are discussed.

One-Year Results of Simultaneous Topography-Guided Photorefractive Keratectomy and Corneal Collagen Cross-Linking in Keratoconus Utilizing a Modern Ablation Software

Purpose. To evaluate effectiveness of simultaneous topography-guided photorefractive keratectomy and corneal collagen cross-linking in mild and moderate keratoconus. Methods. Prospective nonrandomized interventional study including 20 eyes of 14 patients with grade 1-2 keratoconus that underwent topography-guided PRK using a Custom Ablation Transition Zone (CATz) profile with 0.02% MMC application immediately followed by standard 3 mw/cm² UVA collagen cross-linking. Maximum ablation depth did not exceed 58 μm. Follow-up period: 12 months. Results. Progressive statistically significant improvement of UCVA from 0.83 ± 0.37 logMAR preoperative, reaching 0.25 ± 0.26 logMAR at 12 months (P < 0.001). Preoperative BCVA (0.27 ± 0.31 logMAR) showed a progressive improvement reaching 0.08 ± 0.12 logMAR at 12 months (P = 0.02). Mean Kmax reduced from 48.9 ± 2.8 to 45.4 ± 3.1 D at 12 months (P < 0.001), mean Kmin reduced from 45.9 ± 2.8 D to 44.1 ± 3.2 D at 12 months (P < 0.003), mean keratometric asymmetry reduced from 3.01 ± 2.03 D to 1.25 ± 1.2 D at 12 months (P < 0.001). The safety index was 1.39 at 12 months and efficacy index 0.97 at 12 months. Conclusion. Combined topography-guided PRK and corneal collagen cross-linking are a safe and effective option in the management of mild and moderate keratoconus. Precis. To our knowledge, this is the first published study on the use of the CATz ablation system on the Nidek Quest excimer laser platform combined with conventional cross-linking in the management of mild keratoconus.

Corneal Collagen Cross-linking: A Review of Clinical Applications

Corneal collagen cross-linking (CXL) has been shown to slow down or stop the progression of keratoconus. In addition, CXL has been applied in cases of corneal ectasia. Recent reports of the use of CXL in cases of infectious keratitis have generated further interest in this treatment modality. This review discusses the principle, clinical uses, and complications associated with CXL.

Simultaneous topography-guided partial photorefractive keratectomy and corneal collagen crosslinking for keratoconus

PURPOSE

To report the visual, refractive, and clinical outcomes of simultaneous topography-guided partial photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) and corneal collagen crosslinking (CXL) in eyes with keratoconus.

SETTING

Private practice surgery center, Dubai, United Arab Emirates.

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

METHODS

Refraction, uncorrected (UDVA) and corrected (CDVA) distance visual acuities, flat and steep keratometry (K) readings, and complications were evaluated 1, 3, 6, and 12 months postoperatively.

RESULTS

The study enrolled 31 eyes of 31 patients aged 21 to 42 years. All study parameters showed a statistically significant improvement at 3, 6, and 12 months over baseline values. At 12 months, the mean UDVA improved to 0.23 logMAR±0.33 (SD) from 0.79±0.36 logMAR (P<.001) and the CDVA improved to 0.06±0.07 logMAR from 0.28±0.20 logMAR (P<.001). The mean defocus decreased from 3.45±1.60 diopters (D) to 1.88±1.58 D (P<.001). The flat K and steep K readings showed significant flattening. The mean refractive astigmatism decreased from -2.77±1.47 D to -0.98±0.76 D (P<.001). The improvement in study parameters plateaued after 3 months.

CONCLUSION

Simultaneous topography-guided partial PRK and CXL was effective, safe, and stable in keratoconus patients.

FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE

No author has a financial or proprietary interest in any material or method mentioned.