1
|
Kumar VP, Kong Y, Dolland R, Brown SR, Wang K, Dolland D, Mu D, Brown ML. Exploring Angiotensin II and Oxidative Stress in Radiation-Induced Cataract Formation: Potential for Therapeutic Intervention. Antioxidants (Basel) 2024; 13:1207. [PMID: 39456460 PMCID: PMC11504979 DOI: 10.3390/antiox13101207] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/01/2024] [Revised: 10/01/2024] [Accepted: 10/06/2024] [Indexed: 10/28/2024] Open
Abstract
Radiation-induced cataracts (RICs) represent a significant public health challenge, particularly impacting individuals exposed to ionizing radiation (IR) through medical treatments, occupational settings, and environmental factors. Effective therapeutic strategies require a deep understanding of the mechanisms underlying RIC formation (RICF). This study investigates the roles of angiotensin II (Ang II) and oxidative stress in RIC development, with a focus on their combined effects on lens transparency and cellular function. Key mechanisms include the generation of reactive oxygen species (ROS) and oxidative damage to lens proteins and lipids, as well as the impact of Ang II on inflammatory responses and cellular apoptosis. While the generation of ROS from water radiolysis is well established, the impact of Ang II on RICs is less understood. Ang II intensifies oxidative stress by activating type 1 receptors (AT1Rs) on lens epithelial cells, resulting in increased ROS production and inflammatory responses. This oxidative damage leads to protein aggregation, lipid peroxidation, and apoptosis, ultimately compromising lens transparency and contributing to cataract formation. Recent studies highlight Ang II's dual role in promoting both oxidative stress and inflammation, which accelerates cataract development. RICs pose a substantial public health concern due to their widespread prevalence and impact on quality of life. Targeting Ang II signaling and oxidative stress simultaneously could represent a promising therapeutic approach. Continued research is necessary to validate these strategies and explore their efficacy in preventing or reversing RIC development.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vidya P. Kumar
- Armed Forces Radiobiology Research Institute, The Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, MD 20889, USA;
| | - Yali Kong
- Department of Biomedical and Translational Sciences, Macon & Joan Brock Virginia Health Sciences at Old Dominion University, Norfolk, VA 23507, USA; (Y.K.); (K.W.); (D.M.)
| | - Riana Dolland
- Trocar Pharma Inc., 8101 Sandy Spring Rd., Suite 300-W9, Laurel, MD 20707, USA; (R.D.); (D.D.)
| | - Sandra R. Brown
- LensCrafters, Inc., 110 Mall Circle, Suite 2001, Waldorf, MD 20603, USA;
| | - Kan Wang
- Department of Biomedical and Translational Sciences, Macon & Joan Brock Virginia Health Sciences at Old Dominion University, Norfolk, VA 23507, USA; (Y.K.); (K.W.); (D.M.)
| | - Damian Dolland
- Trocar Pharma Inc., 8101 Sandy Spring Rd., Suite 300-W9, Laurel, MD 20707, USA; (R.D.); (D.D.)
| | - David Mu
- Department of Biomedical and Translational Sciences, Macon & Joan Brock Virginia Health Sciences at Old Dominion University, Norfolk, VA 23507, USA; (Y.K.); (K.W.); (D.M.)
- Leroy T. Canoles, Jr. Cancer Research Center, Macon & Joan Brock Virginia Health Sciences at Old Dominion University, Norfolk, VA 23507, USA
| | - Milton L. Brown
- Department of Internal Medicine, Macon & Joan Brock Virginia Health Sciences at Old Dominion University, Norfolk, VA 23507, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Nhari M, Thariat J, Kodjikian L, Chacun S, Nguyen AM, Rosier L, Herault J, Salleron J, Mathis T. Visual outcomes of macular melanocytic lesions after early or delayed proton beam therapy. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2023:10.1007/s00417-023-05981-x. [PMID: 36729331 DOI: 10.1007/s00417-023-05981-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/16/2022] [Revised: 12/22/2022] [Accepted: 01/13/2023] [Indexed: 02/03/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE During their initial management, some macular melanocytic lesions can be closely monitored to wait for a documented growth before advocating a treatment by irradiation. However, the visual outcomes of this strategy have not yet been assessed. This study compares the visual outcomes of macular melanocytic lesions that underwent delayed proton beam therapy (PBT) after an initial observation to those treated early. METHODS A total of 162 patients with suspicious melanocytic lesions whose margins were located within 3 mm of the fovea were recruited from two French ocular oncology centers. RESULTS Overall, 82 patients treated with PBT within 4 months after the initial visit (early PBT group) were compared to 24 patients treated with delayed PBT (delayed PBT group) and 56 patients not treated with PBT (observation group). Visual acuity was not significantly different between baseline and last visit in the observation group (p = 0.325). Between baseline and last visit, the median [IQR] loss in visual acuity was significant in both the early (0.7 [0.2; 1.8], p < 0.001) and the delayed (0.5 [0.2; 1.5], p < 0.001) PBT groups. After irradiation, there was no significant difference between the early and delayed PBT groups for visual loss (p = 0.575), diameter reduction (p = 0.190), and thickness lowering (p = 0.892). In multivariate analysis, history of diabetes mellitus and Bruch's membrane rupture remained significantly associated with greater visual loss (p = 0.036 and p = 0.002, respectively). CONCLUSION For small lesions in which there is no clear diagnosis of malignant melanoma, an initial close monitoring to document tumor growth does not impact visual prognosis, despite the potential complications associated with the untreated tumor. However, the survival should remain the main outcome of the treatment of these lesions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maxime Nhari
- Service d'Ophtalmologie, Hôpital Universitaire de La Croix-Rousse, Hospices Civils de Lyon, 103, Grande Rue de La Croix-Rousse, 69317cedex 04, Lyon, France
| | - Juliette Thariat
- Laboratoire de Physique Corpusculaire / IN2P3-CNRS UMR 6534 - ARCHADE, Unicaen - Université de Normandie, 14000, Caen, France
| | - Laurent Kodjikian
- Service d'Ophtalmologie, Hôpital Universitaire de La Croix-Rousse, Hospices Civils de Lyon, 103, Grande Rue de La Croix-Rousse, 69317cedex 04, Lyon, France.,UMR 5510 MATEIS, CNRS, INSA Lyon, Université Lyon 1, 69100, Villeurbanne, France
| | - Samuel Chacun
- Service d'Ophtalmologie, Hôpital Universitaire de La Croix-Rousse, Hospices Civils de Lyon, 103, Grande Rue de La Croix-Rousse, 69317cedex 04, Lyon, France
| | - Anh-Minh Nguyen
- Service d'Ophtalmologie, Hôpital Universitaire de La Croix-Rousse, Hospices Civils de Lyon, 103, Grande Rue de La Croix-Rousse, 69317cedex 04, Lyon, France
| | - Laurence Rosier
- Centre Ophtalmologique Rétine Galien, 33000, Bordeaux, France
| | - Joël Herault
- Service de Radiothérapie, Centre Antoine Lacassagne, 06000, Nice, France
| | - Julia Salleron
- Cellule Data Biostatistique, Institut de Cancérologie de Lorraine, 54000, Nancy, France
| | - Thibaud Mathis
- Service d'Ophtalmologie, Hôpital Universitaire de La Croix-Rousse, Hospices Civils de Lyon, 103, Grande Rue de La Croix-Rousse, 69317cedex 04, Lyon, France. .,UMR 5510 MATEIS, CNRS, INSA Lyon, Université Lyon 1, 69100, Villeurbanne, France.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Sepulveda-Beltran PA, Levine H, Gibbons AG, Maharaj A, Choi DS, Martinez JD, Correa ZM, Amescua G, Harbour JW. Post-Radiation Cataract Management: Outcomes in Individuals with Uveal Melanoma. CURRENT OPHTHALMOLOGY REPORTS 2022. [DOI: 10.1007/s40135-022-00304-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
|
4
|
Mikryukova L, Akleyev A. Risk of cataract of different morphological types in Urals population chronically exposed at low doses. RADIATION MEDICINE AND PROTECTION 2022. [DOI: 10.1016/j.radmp.2022.09.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/14/2022] Open
|
5
|
Hérault J, Gérard A, Carnicer A, Aloi D, Peyrichon ML, Barnel C, Vidal M, Angellier G, Fayaud D, Grini JC, Giusto A, Armando C, Donadey G, Cabannes M, Dumas S, Payan Y, Di Carlo JF, Salicis C, Bergerot JM, Rolion M, Trimaud R, Hofverberg P, Mandrillon P, Sauerwein W, Thariat J. 30 years of ocular proton therapy, the Nice view. Cancer Radiother 2022; 26:1016-1026. [PMID: 35803860 DOI: 10.1016/j.canrad.2022.03.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/29/2021] [Accepted: 03/15/2022] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Radiotherapy with protons (PT) is a standard treatment of ocular tumors. It achieves excellent tumor control, limited toxicities, and the preservation of important functional outcomes, such as vision. Although PT may appear as one homogenous technique, it can be performed using dedicated ocular passive scattering PT or, increasingly, Pencil Beam Scanning (PBS), both with various degrees of patient-oriented customization. MATERAIAL AND METHODS MEDICYC PT facility of Nice are detailed with respect to their technical, dosimetric, microdosimetric and radiobiological, patient and tumor-customization process of PT planning and delivery that are key. 6684 patients have been treated for ocular tumors (1991-2020). Machine characteristics (accelerator, beam line, beam monitoring) allow efficient proton extraction, high dose rate, sharp lateral and distal penumbrae, and limited stray radiation in comparison to beam energy reduction and subsequent straggling with high-energy PBS PT. Patient preparation before PT includes customized setup and image-guidance, CT-based planning, and ocular PT software modelling of the patient eye with integration of beam modifiers. Clinical reports have shown excellent tumor control rates (∼95%), vision preservation and limited toxicity rates (papillopathy, retinopathy, neovascular glaucoma, dry eye, madarosis, cataract). RESULTS Although demanding, dedicated ocular PT has proven its efficiency in achieving excellent tumor control, OAR sparing and patient radioprotection. It is therefore worth adaptations of the equipments and practice. CONCLUSIONS Some of these adaptations can be transferred to other PT centers and should be acknowledeged when using non-PT options.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J Hérault
- Institut Méditerranéen de ProtonThérapie, Centre Antoine Lacassagne, 227, avenue de la Lanterne, 06200 Nice, France.
| | - A Gérard
- Institut Méditerranéen de ProtonThérapie, Centre Antoine Lacassagne, 227, avenue de la Lanterne, 06200 Nice, France
| | - A Carnicer
- IDOM Consulting, Engineering, Architecture, Avinguda de la Fama, 11-15, Arboretum Business Park, Arce Building, 08940 Cornellà de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain
| | - D Aloi
- Institut Méditerranéen de ProtonThérapie, Centre Antoine Lacassagne, 227, avenue de la Lanterne, 06200 Nice, France
| | - M-L Peyrichon
- Institut Méditerranéen de ProtonThérapie, Centre Antoine Lacassagne, 227, avenue de la Lanterne, 06200 Nice, France
| | - C Barnel
- Institut Méditerranéen de ProtonThérapie, Centre Antoine Lacassagne, 227, avenue de la Lanterne, 06200 Nice, France
| | - M Vidal
- Institut Méditerranéen de ProtonThérapie, Centre Antoine Lacassagne, 227, avenue de la Lanterne, 06200 Nice, France
| | - G Angellier
- Institut Méditerranéen de ProtonThérapie, Centre Antoine Lacassagne, 227, avenue de la Lanterne, 06200 Nice, France
| | - D Fayaud
- Institut Méditerranéen de ProtonThérapie, Centre Antoine Lacassagne, 227, avenue de la Lanterne, 06200 Nice, France
| | - J-C Grini
- Institut Méditerranéen de ProtonThérapie, Centre Antoine Lacassagne, 227, avenue de la Lanterne, 06200 Nice, France
| | - A Giusto
- Institut Méditerranéen de ProtonThérapie, Centre Antoine Lacassagne, 227, avenue de la Lanterne, 06200 Nice, France
| | - C Armando
- Institut Méditerranéen de ProtonThérapie, Centre Antoine Lacassagne, 227, avenue de la Lanterne, 06200 Nice, France
| | - G Donadey
- Institut Méditerranéen de ProtonThérapie, Centre Antoine Lacassagne, 227, avenue de la Lanterne, 06200 Nice, France
| | - M Cabannes
- Institut Méditerranéen de ProtonThérapie, Centre Antoine Lacassagne, 227, avenue de la Lanterne, 06200 Nice, France
| | - S Dumas
- Institut Méditerranéen de ProtonThérapie, Centre Antoine Lacassagne, 227, avenue de la Lanterne, 06200 Nice, France
| | - Y Payan
- Institut Méditerranéen de ProtonThérapie, Centre Antoine Lacassagne, 227, avenue de la Lanterne, 06200 Nice, France
| | - J-F Di Carlo
- Institut Méditerranéen de ProtonThérapie, Centre Antoine Lacassagne, 227, avenue de la Lanterne, 06200 Nice, France
| | - C Salicis
- Institut Méditerranéen de ProtonThérapie, Centre Antoine Lacassagne, 227, avenue de la Lanterne, 06200 Nice, France
| | - J-M Bergerot
- Institut Méditerranéen de ProtonThérapie, Centre Antoine Lacassagne, 227, avenue de la Lanterne, 06200 Nice, France
| | - M Rolion
- Institut Méditerranéen de ProtonThérapie, Centre Antoine Lacassagne, 227, avenue de la Lanterne, 06200 Nice, France
| | - R Trimaud
- Institut Méditerranéen de ProtonThérapie, Centre Antoine Lacassagne, 227, avenue de la Lanterne, 06200 Nice, France
| | - P Hofverberg
- Institut Méditerranéen de ProtonThérapie, Centre Antoine Lacassagne, 227, avenue de la Lanterne, 06200 Nice, France
| | - P Mandrillon
- AIMA Development, 227, avenue de la Lanterne, 06200 Nice, France
| | - W Sauerwein
- NCTeam, Strahlenklinik, Universitätsklinikum Essen, Hufelandstraße 55, 45122 Essen, Germany
| | - J Thariat
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Centre François Baclesse, 14000 Caen, France; Laboratoire de Physique Corpusculaire IN2P3/ENSICAEN-UMR6534-Unicaen-Normandie Université, 14000 Caen, France
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Thariat J, Martel A, Matet A, Loria O, Kodjikian L, Nguyen AM, Rosier L, Herault J, Nahon-Estève S, Mathis T. Non-Cancer Effects following Ionizing Irradiation Involving the Eye and Orbit. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:cancers14051194. [PMID: 35267502 PMCID: PMC8909862 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14051194] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/09/2022] [Revised: 02/14/2022] [Accepted: 02/24/2022] [Indexed: 12/04/2022] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary The irradiation of tumors involving the eye or orbit represents a complex therapeutic challenge due to the proximity between the tumor and organs that are susceptible to radiation. The challenges include tumor control, as it is often a surrogate for survival; organ (usually the eyeball) preservation; and the minimization of damage of sensitive tissues surrounding the tumor in order to preserve vision. Anticipation of the spectrum and severity of radiation-induced complications is crucial to the decision of which technique to use for a given tumor. The aim of the present review is to report the non-cancer effects that may occur following ionizing irradiation involving the eye and orbit and their specific patterns of toxicity for a given radiotherapy modality. The pros and cons of conventional and advanced forms of radiation techniques and their clinical implementation are provided with a clinical perspective. Abstract The eye is an exemplarily challenging organ to treat when considering ocular tumors. It is at the crossroads of several major aims in oncology: tumor control, organ preservation, and functional outcomes including vision and quality of life. The proximity between the tumor and organs that are susceptible to radiation damage explain these challenges. Given a high enough dose of radiation, virtually any cancer will be destroyed with radiotherapy. Yet, the doses inevitably absorbed by normal tissues may lead to complications, the likelihood of which increases with the radiation dose and volume of normal tissues irradiated. Precision radiotherapy allows personalized decision-making algorithms based on patient and tumor characteristics by exploiting the full knowledge of the physics, radiobiology, and the modifications made to the radiotherapy equipment to adapt to the various ocular tumors. Anticipation of the spectrum and severity of radiation-induced complications is crucial to the decision of which technique to use for a given tumor. Radiation can damage the lacrimal gland, eyelashes/eyelids, cornea, lens, macula/retina, optic nerves and chiasma, each having specific dose–response characteristics. The present review is a report of non-cancer effects that may occur following ionizing irradiation involving the eye and orbit and their specific patterns of toxicity for a given radiotherapy modality.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Juliette Thariat
- Laboratoire de Physique Corpusculaire/IN2P3-CNRS UMR 6534—ARCHADE, Unicaen—Université de Normandie, 14000 Caen, France
- Correspondence: (J.T.); (T.M.)
| | - Arnaud Martel
- Service d’Ophtalmologie, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nice, Université Côte d’Azur, 06000 Nice, France; (A.M.); (S.N.-E.)
- Laboratoire de Pathologie Clinique et Expérimentale, Biobank BB-0033-00025, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nice, Université Côte d’Azur, 06000 Nice, France
| | - Alexandre Matet
- Service d’Oncologie Oculaire, Institut Curie, 75005 Paris, France;
| | - Olivier Loria
- Service d’Ophtalmologie, Hôpital Universitaire de la Croix-Rousse, Hospices Civils de Lyon, 69317 Lyon, France; (O.L.); (L.K.); (A.-M.N.)
| | - Laurent Kodjikian
- Service d’Ophtalmologie, Hôpital Universitaire de la Croix-Rousse, Hospices Civils de Lyon, 69317 Lyon, France; (O.L.); (L.K.); (A.-M.N.)
- UMR-CNRS 5510 Matéis, 69100 Villeurbanne, France
| | - Anh-Minh Nguyen
- Service d’Ophtalmologie, Hôpital Universitaire de la Croix-Rousse, Hospices Civils de Lyon, 69317 Lyon, France; (O.L.); (L.K.); (A.-M.N.)
| | - Laurence Rosier
- Centre Rétine Galien, Centre d’Exploration et de Traitement de la Rétine et de la Macula, 33000 Bordeaux, France;
| | - Joël Herault
- Service de Radiothérapie, Centre Antoine Lacassagne, 06000 Nice, France;
| | - Sacha Nahon-Estève
- Service d’Ophtalmologie, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nice, Université Côte d’Azur, 06000 Nice, France; (A.M.); (S.N.-E.)
- INSERM, Biology and Pathologies of Melanocytes, Team1, Equipe labellisée Ligue 2020 and Equipe labellisée ARC 2019, Centre Méditerranéen de Médecine Moléculaire, 06200 Nice, France
| | - Thibaud Mathis
- Service d’Ophtalmologie, Hôpital Universitaire de la Croix-Rousse, Hospices Civils de Lyon, 69317 Lyon, France; (O.L.); (L.K.); (A.-M.N.)
- UMR-CNRS 5510 Matéis, 69100 Villeurbanne, France
- Correspondence: (J.T.); (T.M.)
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Fleury E, Trnková P, Spruijt K, Herault J, Lebbink F, Heufelder J, Hrbacek J, Horwacik T, Kajdrowicz T, Denker A, Gerard A, Hofverberg P, Mamalui M, Slopsema R, Pignol J, Hoogeman M. Characterization of the HollandPTC proton therapy beamline dedicated to uveal melanoma treatment and an interinstitutional comparison. Med Phys 2021; 48:4506-4522. [PMID: 34091930 PMCID: PMC8457201 DOI: 10.1002/mp.15024] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/15/2021] [Revised: 05/08/2021] [Accepted: 05/25/2021] [Indexed: 12/30/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Eye-dedicated proton therapy (PT) facilities are used to treat malignant intraocular lesions, especially uveal melanoma (UM). The first commercial ocular PT beamline from Varian was installed in the Netherlands. In this work, the conceptual design of the new eyeline is presented. In addition, a comprehensive comparison against five PT centers with dedicated ocular beamlines is performed, and the clinical impact of the identified differences is analyzed. MATERIAL/METHODS The HollandPTC eyeline was characterized. Four centers in Europe and one in the United States joined the study. All centers use a cyclotron for proton beam generation and an eye-dedicated nozzle. Differences among the chosen ocular beamlines were in the design of the nozzle, nominal energy, and energy spectrum. The following parameters were collected for all centers: technical characteristics and a set of distal, proximal, and lateral region measurements. The measurements were performed with detectors available in-house at each institution. The institutions followed the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) Technical Report Series (TRS)-398 Code of Practice for absolute dose measurement, and the IAEA TRS-398 Code of Practice, its modified version or International Commission on Radiation Units and Measurements Report No. 78 for spread-out Bragg peak normalization. Energy spreads of the pristine Bragg peaks were obtained with Monte Carlo simulations using Geant4. Seven tumor-specific case scenarios were simulated to evaluate the clinical impact among centers: small, medium, and large UM, located either anteriorly, at the equator, or posteriorly within the eye. Differences in the depth dose distributions were calculated. RESULTS A pristine Bragg peak of HollandPTC eyeline corresponded to the constant energy of 75 MeV (maximal range 3.97 g/cm2 in water) with an energy spread of 1.10 MeV. The pristine Bragg peaks for the five participating centers varied from 62.50 to 104.50 MeV with an energy spread variation between 0.10 and 0.70 MeV. Differences in the average distal fall-offs and lateral penumbrae (LPs) (over the complete set of clinically available beam modulations) among all centers were up to 0.25 g/cm2 , and 0.80 mm, respectively. Average distal fall-offs of the HollandPTC eyeline were 0.20 g/cm2 , and LPs were between 1.50 and 2.15 mm from proximal to distal regions, respectively. Treatment time, around 60 s, was comparable among all centers. The virtual source-to-axis distance of 120 cm at HollandPTC was shorter than for the five participating centers (range: 165-350 cm). Simulated depth dose distributions demonstrated the impact of the different beamline characteristics among institutions. The largest difference was observed for a small UM located at the posterior pole, where a proximal dose between two extreme centers was up to 20%. CONCLUSIONS HollandPTC eyeline specifications are in accordance with five other ocular PT beamlines. Similar clinical concepts can be applied to expect the same high local tumor control. Dosimetrical properties among the six institutions induce most likely differences in ocular radiation-related toxicities. This interinstitutional comparison could support further research on ocular post-PT complications. Finally, the findings reported in this study could be used to define dosimetrical guidelines for ocular PT to unify the concepts among institutions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emmanuelle Fleury
- Department of RadiotherapyErasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Center RotterdamThe Netherlands
- Holland Proton Therapy CenterDelftThe Netherlands
| | - Petra Trnková
- Department of RadiotherapyErasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Center RotterdamThe Netherlands
- Departement of Radiation OncologyMedical University of ViennaViennaAustria
| | - Kees Spruijt
- Holland Proton Therapy CenterDelftThe Netherlands
| | - Joël Herault
- Departement of Radiation OncologyCentre Antoine LacassagneNiceFrance
| | | | - Jens Heufelder
- Helmholtz‐Zentrum Berlin für Materialien und EnergieBerlinGermany
- Department of OphthalmologyCharité ‐ Universitätsmedizin BerlinBerlinGermany
| | - Jan Hrbacek
- Paul Scherrer Institute Center for Proton TherapyVilligenSwitzerland
| | - Tomasz Horwacik
- Institute of Nuclear PhysicsPolish Academy of SciencesKrakówPoland
| | | | - Andrea Denker
- Helmholtz‐Zentrum Berlin für Materialien und EnergieBerlinGermany
| | - Anaïs Gerard
- Departement of Radiation OncologyCentre Antoine LacassagneNiceFrance
| | - Petter Hofverberg
- Departement of Radiation OncologyCentre Antoine LacassagneNiceFrance
| | - Maria Mamalui
- Department of Radiation OncologyUniversity of FloridaGainesvilleFloridaUSA
| | - Roelf Slopsema
- Department of Radiation OncologyEmory Proton Therapy CenterAtlantaGeorgiaUSA
| | | | - Mischa Hoogeman
- Department of RadiotherapyErasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Center RotterdamThe Netherlands
- Holland Proton Therapy CenterDelftThe Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Ainsbury EA, Dalke C, Hamada N, Benadjaoud MA, Chumak V, Ginjaume M, Kok JL, Mancuso M, Sabatier L, Struelens L, Thariat J, Jourdain JR. Radiation-induced lens opacities: Epidemiological, clinical and experimental evidence, methodological issues, research gaps and strategy. ENVIRONMENT INTERNATIONAL 2021; 146:106213. [PMID: 33276315 DOI: 10.1016/j.envint.2020.106213] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/20/2020] [Revised: 08/11/2020] [Accepted: 08/25/2020] [Indexed: 06/12/2023]
Abstract
In 2011, the International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP) recommended reducing the occupational equivalent dose limit for the lens of the eye from 150 mSv/year to 20 mSv/year, averaged over five years, with no single year exceeding 50 mSv. With this recommendation, several important assumptions were made, such as lack of dose rate effect, classification of cataracts as a tissue reaction with a dose threshold at 0.5 Gy, and progression of minor opacities into vision-impairing cataracts. However, although new dose thresholds and occupational dose limits have been set for radiation-induced cataract, ICRP clearly states that the recommendations are chiefly based on epidemiological evidence because there are a very small number of studies that provide explicit biological and mechanistic evidence at doses under 2 Gy. Since the release of the 2011 ICRP statement, the Multidisciplinary European Low Dose Initiative (MELODI) supported in April 2019 a scientific workshop that aimed to review epidemiological, clinical and biological evidence for radiation-induced cataracts. The purpose of this article is to present and discuss recent related epidemiological and clinical studies, ophthalmic examination techniques, biological and mechanistic knowledge, and to identify research gaps, towards the implementation of a research strategy for future studies on radiation-induced lens opacities. The authors recommend particularly to study the effect of ionizing radiation on the lens in the context of the wider, systemic effects, including in the retina, brain and other organs, and as such cataract is recommended to be studied as part of larger scale programs focused on multiple radiation health effects.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elizabeth A Ainsbury
- Public Health England (PHE) Centre for Radiation, Chemical and Environmental Hazards, Oxon, United Kingdom.
| | - Claudia Dalke
- Helmholtz Zentrum München GmbH, German Research Center for Environmental Health, Germany.
| | - Nobuyuki Hamada
- Radiation Safety Research Center, Nuclear Technology Research Laboratory, Central Research Institute of Electric Power Industry (CRIEPI), Tokyo, Japan.
| | - Mohamed Amine Benadjaoud
- Institut de Radioprotection et de Sûreté Nucléaire (IRSN), BP 17, 31 avenue de la division Leclerc, Fontenay-aux-Roses, France.
| | - Vadim Chumak
- National Research Centre for Radiation Medicine, Ukraine.
| | | | - Judith L Kok
- Princess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
| | - Mariateresa Mancuso
- Laboratory of Biomedical Technologies, Italian National Agency for New Technologies, Energy and Sustainable Economic Development, (ENEA), Rome, Italy.
| | - Laure Sabatier
- Commissariat à l'Energie Atomique et aux Energies Alternatives, Saclay, France.
| | | | - Juliette Thariat
- Laboratoire de physique corpusculaire IN2P3/ENSICAEN -UMR6534 - Unicaen - Normandie University, France
| | - Jean-René Jourdain
- Institut de Radioprotection et de Sûreté Nucléaire (IRSN), BP 17, 31 avenue de la division Leclerc, Fontenay-aux-Roses, France.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Espensen CA, Kiilgaard JF, Appelt AL, Fog LS, Herault J, Maschi C, Caujolle JP, Thariat J. Dose-Response and Normal Tissue Complication Probabilities after Proton Therapy for Choroidal Melanoma. Ophthalmology 2020; 128:152-161. [PMID: 32574763 DOI: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2020.06.030] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/17/2019] [Revised: 06/12/2020] [Accepted: 06/12/2020] [Indexed: 01/24/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) models could aid the understanding of dose dependence of radiation-induced toxicities after eye-preserving radiotherapy of choroidal melanomas. We performed NTCP-modeling and established dose-response relationships for visual acuity (VA) deterioration and common late complications after treatments with proton therapy (PT). DESIGN Retrospective study from single, large referral center. PARTICIPANTS We considered patients from Nice, France, diagnosed with choroidal melanoma and treated primarily with hypofractionated PT (52 Gy physical dose in 4 fractions). Complete VA deterioration information was available for 1020 patients, and complete information on late complications was available for 991 patients. METHODS Treatment details, dose-volume histograms (DVHs) for relevant anatomic structures, and patient and tumor characteristics were available from a dedicated ocular database. Least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) variable selection was used to identify variables with the strongest impact on each end point, followed by multivariate Cox regressions and logistic regressions to analyze the relationships among dose, clinical characteristics, and clinical outcomes. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Dose-response relationship for VA deterioration and late complications. RESULTS Dose metrics for several structures (i.e., optic disc, macula, retina, globe, lens, ciliary body) correlated with clinical outcome. The near-maximum dose to the macula showed the strongest correlation with VA deterioration. The near-maximum dose to the retina was the only variable with clear impact on the risk of maculopathy, the dose to 20% of the optic disc had the largest impact on optic neuropathy, dose to 20% of cornea had the largest impact on neovascular glaucoma, and dose to 20% of the ciliary body had the largest impact on ocular hypertension. The volume of the ciliary body receiving 26 Gy was the only variable associated with the risk of cataract, and the volume of retina receiving 52 Gy was associated with the risk of retinal detachment. Optic disc-to-tumor distance was the only variable associated with dry eye syndrome in the absence of DVH for the lachrymal gland. CONCLUSIONS VA deterioration and specific late complications demonstrated dependence on dose delivered to normal structures in the eye after PT for choroidal melanoma. VA deterioration depended on dose to a range of structures, whereas more specific complications were related to dose metrics for specific structures.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Charlotte A Espensen
- Department of Oncology, Section of Radiotherapy, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark; Department of Ophthalmology, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Jens F Kiilgaard
- Department of Ophthalmology, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.
| | - Ane L Appelt
- Leeds Institute of Medical Research at St. James's, University of Leeds, and Leeds Cancer Centre, St. James's University Hospital, Leeds, United Kingdom
| | - Lotte S Fog
- Department of Physical Sciences, The Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia; Alfred Health Radiation Oncology, The Alfred, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Joel Herault
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Centre Antoine-Lacassagne, Nice, France
| | - Celia Maschi
- Department of Ophthalmology, Nice University Hospital, Nice, France
| | | | - Juliette Thariat
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Centre Francois Baclesse, Caen, France; Laboratoire de Physique Corpusculaire IN2P3/ENSICAEN, Caen, France; University of Caen Normandy, Caen, France
| |
Collapse
|