Classification Criteria for Acute Retinal Necrosis Syndrome

Acute retinal necrosis

Acute retinal necrosis (ARN) is a rare, progressive viral uveitis, with the majority of cases caused by herpesviruses. The diagnosis of ARN is often delayed, and most patients will have some degree of permanent visual loss. We report a case of ARN in a previously healthy 32-year-old patient.

Automated early detection of acute retinal necrosis from ultra-widefield color fundus photography using deep learning

BACKGROUND

Acute retinal necrosis (ARN) is a relatively rare but highly damaging and potentially sight-threatening type of uveitis caused by infection with the human herpesvirus. Without timely diagnosis and appropriate treatment, ARN can lead to severe vision loss. We aimed to develop a deep learning framework to distinguish ARN from other types of intermediate, posterior, and panuveitis using ultra-widefield color fundus photography (UWFCFP).

METHODS

We conducted a two-center retrospective discovery and validation study to develop and validate a deep learning model called DeepDrARN for automatic uveitis detection and differentiation of ARN from other uveitis types using 11,508 UWFCFPs from 1,112 participants. Model performance was evaluated with the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC), the area under the precision and recall curves (AUPR), sensitivity and specificity, and compared with seven ophthalmologists.

RESULTS

DeepDrARN for uveitis screening achieved an AUROC of 0.996 (95% CI: 0.994-0.999) in the internal validation cohort and demonstrated good generalizability with an AUROC of 0.973 (95% CI: 0.956-0.990) in the external validation cohort. DeepDrARN also demonstrated excellent predictive ability in distinguishing ARN from other types of uveitis with AUROCs of 0.960 (95% CI: 0.943-0.977) and 0.971 (95% CI: 0.956-0.986) in the internal and external validation cohorts. DeepDrARN was also tested in the differentiation of ARN, non-ARN uveitis (NAU) and normal subjects, with sensitivities of 88.9% and 78.7% and specificities of 93.8% and 89.1% in the internal and external validation cohorts, respectively. The performance of DeepDrARN is comparable to that of ophthalmologists and even exceeds the average accuracy of seven ophthalmologists, showing an improvement of 6.57% in uveitis screening and 11.14% in ARN identification.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study demonstrates the feasibility of deep learning algorithms in enabling early detection, reducing treatment delays, and improving outcomes for ARN patients.

Common Practice Patterns in the Diagnosis and Management of Acute Retinal Necrosis: A Survey Study of Uveitis Specialists

PURPOSE

Due to lack of large randomized clinical trials to determine best practices in treating acute retinal necrosis (ARN), there is not a clear consensus amongst ophthalmologists on how to best manage this potentially blinding condition. The aim of this study is to survey common practice patterns and analyze the factors that affect ophthalmologists' management of ARN.

METHODS

An anonymous survey was distributed to uveitis and retina specialists who are members of the American Uveitis Society (AUS) via email to query practice patterns regarding ARN. The survey included 22 questions with an additional 10 questions based on response. Survey question topics included demographic information, diagnostic testing, antiviral therapy, corticosteroids, and surgical procedures.

RESULTS

67 surveys were included for analysis. Most respondents (87%) always or frequently obtain intraocular aqueous fluid for diagnostic PCR testing. The majority of respondents would administer intravitreal antiviral injections to a unilateral immunocompetent ARN patient (67%), but would be even more likely to do so for a bilateral immunosuppressed ARN patient (87%). Respondents tend to treat ARN with systemic rather than local corticosteroids, with the majority (63%) of respondents initiating corticosteroid treatment 48 hours after treatment. Most respondents (79%) never perform a vitrectomy to manage ARN unless the patient has a retinal detachment or tear. The majority (63%) rarely or never perform prophylactic laser barricade, but may consider laser treatment if there is extensive retinal involvement.

CONCLUSION

Current practice patterns for diagnosis and management of ARN among AUS members generally align with the suggested practices outlined by the American Academy of Ophthalmology.

Diagnostic and therapeutic challenges in acute retinal necrosis; an update

Acute retinal necrosis (ARN) is a rare but severe ophthalmic pathology defined by panuveitis, retinal necrosis, and high rates of retinal detachment. ARN may lead to poor visual outcomes even if promptly diagnosed and treated. ARN may present with a wide spectrum of clinical findings compatible with panuveitis including anterior uveitis, scleritis, vitritis, necrotizing retinitis, occlusive vasculitis, and optic disc edema. The American Uveitis Society introduced clinical criteria in 1994 for the diagnosis of ARN, while more recent criteria have been proposed by the Standardization of Uveitis Nomenclature (SUN) Working Group and the Japanese ARN Study Group. Multimodal imaging is a valuable tool in evaluating patients with ARN, particularly in unusual cases, while utilizing retinal imaging and applying AI algorithms in these areas of clinical research could be highly beneficial. Over the last few years, significant progress has been made in achieving timely diagnosis and treatment. The precise identification of the viral cause in suspected ARN cases has been greatly enhanced by the advancements in PCR techniques and flow cytometry used for intraocular fluids. systemic (intravenous or oral) antivirals with adjunctive intravitreal antiviral therapy are recommended as first-line therapy to reduce disease severity, the risk of vision loss, and retinal detachment incidence. Although aciclovir was the first existing antiviral agent, at present many clinicians prefer high-dose valaciclovir orally or intravenous aciclovir combined with intravitreal foscarnet. Despite significant progress in diagnosing and treating ARN, further research is needed to improve visual outcomes in this challenging clinical condition.

A Single-Center Case Series of Acute Retinal Necrosis at Teikyo University: Clinical Characteristics and Treatment Outcomes

Aim To evaluate the clinical characteristics, treatment course, and prognosis of patients with acute retinal necrosis (ARN), which can rapidly progress and cause severe vision loss. Design Single-center retrospective case series. Subjects and methods Six patients and seven eyes diagnosed with ARN at Teikyo University Hospital were included in this study. The clinical presentation and treatment prognosis were investigated based on data obtained from medical records. Results The mean age of the patients at the initial diagnosis was 63.6 years. Although the mean Logarithm of the Minimum Angle of Resolution (LogMAR) visual acuity tended to decrease from 0.77 at the first visit to 1.29 at the last visit, the difference was not statistically significant. Intraocular manifestations observed during the study period included ocular hypertension (14.3%), anterior uveitis (100.0%), retinal hemorrhage (71.4%), vitreous opacity (100.0%), retinal exudative vasculitis (85.7%), optic nerve atrophy (85.7%), retinal vascular occlusion (85.7%), choroidal atrophy (85.7%), macular edema (100.0%), subretinal fluid in the macula (71.4%), and retinal detachment (85.7%). Treatment modalities included oral and intravitreal antivirals (85.7%), antiplatelet medications (85.7%), steroid eye drops (85.7%), subcapsular (57.1%) and vitreous (42.9%) steroid injections, oral steroids (71.4%), and surgical intervention (85.7%). Vitrectomy led to retinal recovery in all five eyes that underwent the procedure. Conclusions The visual prognosis of patients with ARN is poor, particularly in those with preexisting visual impairment. Early detection coupled with antiviral therapy and prompt surgical intervention have been identified as potential factors that influence visual outcomes. Given the severity of ARN, collecting data from multiple centers could aid in devising future diagnostic and therapeutic strategies.

Clinical Insights: Antimicrobial Therapy for Infectious Uveitis

Infectious uveitis is a major global cause of vision impairment. Despite the eye's immune privilege, afforded by the blood-ocular barrier that restricts microbial entry, several pathogens such as bacteria, viruses, fungi, and parasites can still infiltrate and cause ocular infections and complications. Clinicians often encounter significant challenges in treating infectious uveitis due to limited or ineffective treatment options. Modern molecular techniques and imaging can aid in diagnosing and assessing intraocular infections. Various antimicrobial therapies exist, spanning topical and systemic treatments, but these are constrained by issues like drug concentration, penetration, effective duration, toxicity, and side effects. Treatment approaches also differ based on the infection's etiology. This review provides recent updates on antimicrobial therapies from a clinical perspective, covering topical, systemic, and regional treatments for infectious uveitis.

Pachychoroid Associated With Acute Retinal Necrosis Secondary to Varicella Zoster Virus

Purpose: To report a case of pachychoroid associated with acute retinal necrosis secondary to the varicella zoster virus (VZV). Methods: A retrospective review of a single case was performed. Results: The VZV-related acute retinal necrosis with pachychoroid resolved with quiescence of the acute infectious process. Conclusions: Acute retinal necrosis can result in choroidal thickening adjacent to retinitis. Previous reports have described choroidal sparing in these cases.

Multitask Deep Learning for Joint Detection of Necrotizing Viral and Noninfectious Retinitis From Common Blood and Serology Test Data

Purpose

Necrotizing viral retinitis is a serious eye infection that requires immediate treatment to prevent permanent vision loss. Uncertain clinical suspicion can result in delayed diagnosis, inappropriate administration of corticosteroids, or repeated intraocular sampling. To quickly and accurately distinguish between viral and noninfectious retinitis, we aimed to develop deep learning (DL) models solely using noninvasive blood test data.

Methods

This cross-sectional study trained DL models using common blood and serology test data from 3080 patients (noninfectious uveitis of the posterior segment [NIU-PS] = 2858, acute retinal necrosis [ARN] = 66, cytomegalovirus [CMV], retinitis = 156). Following the development of separate base DL models for ARN and CMV retinitis, multitask learning (MTL) was employed to enable simultaneous discrimination. Advanced MTL models incorporating adversarial training were used to enhance DL feature extraction from the small, imbalanced data. We evaluated model performance, disease-specific important features, and the causal relationship between DL features and detection results.

Results

The presented models all achieved excellent detection performances, with the adversarial MTL model achieving the highest receiver operating characteristic curves (0.932 for ARN and 0.982 for CMV retinitis). Significant features for ARN detection included varicella-zoster virus (VZV) immunoglobulin M (IgM), herpes simplex virus immunoglobulin G, and neutrophil count, while for CMV retinitis, they encompassed VZV IgM, CMV IgM, and lymphocyte count. The adversarial MTL model exhibited substantial changes in detection outcomes when the key features were contaminated, indicating stronger causality between DL features and detection results.

Conclusions

The adversarial MTL model, using blood test data, may serve as a reliable adjunct for the expedited diagnosis of ARN, CMV retinitis, and NIU-PS simultaneously in real clinical settings.

Retinitis after haematopoietic stem cell transplantation with multiple intraocular viral infections (cytomegalovirus, Epstein‒Barr virus and herpes simplex virus)- a case report

BACKGROUND

To report a case of retinitis with multiple intraocular viral infections after second haematopoietic stem cell transplantation.

CASE PRESENTATION

A 39-year-old female patient developed retinitis after a second haematopoietic stem cell transplant. Right eye was tested for three viral infections- cytomegalovirus, Epstein‒Barr virus and herpes simplex virus, while left was infected with cytomegalovirus. The patient was subsequently treated with vitreous cavity ganciclovir injections, and 1 week later both eyes tested negative for aqueous humour viruses.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION

CMV, EBV and HSV belong to the herpes virus family. They are all commonly observed in the body and represent opportunity infectious viruses. The retinitis they cause have different characteristics. But simultaneous infection of the eye by multiple viruses is quite rare. In this case, three viruses were detected in the patient's eye, but whether the retina was caused by all three viruses at the same time could not be determined. A satisfactory outcome was achieved after treatment with vitreous cavity ganciclovir injection.

Acute retinal necrosis in a patient with cervical malignant tumor treated with sintilimab: a case report and literature review

Acute retinal necrosis (ARN) is an inflammatory disease that is primarily caused by herpesvirus infection, most commonly varicella-zoster virus (VZV), followed by herpes simplex virus (HSV) and occasionally cytomegalovirus (CMV). Sintilimab is an immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) that can enhance the body's anti-tumor immune response. However, treatment with ICIs may lead to reactivation of the VZV. Here, we present a case of ARN caused by VZV infection in a patient receiving sintilimab for cervical cancer. A 64-year-old female patient developed vision loss and floaters with left eye redness for one week after 22 cycles of sintilimab for cervical cancer. Based on clinical manifestations, ophthalmological examination, and vitreous humor biopsy, the patient was diagnosed with acute retinal necrosis syndrome secondary to VZV. After receiving systemic antiviral and anti-inflammatory therapy, retinal necrosis lesions and visual function improved. In conclusion, clinicians should be aware of the risk of ARN when using sintilimab and should actively monitor patients for prompt diagnosis and optimal management of this rare adverse drug reaction.

Clinical characteristics and management outcomes of acute retinal necrosis

This study investigates patient's clinical characteristics and management outcomes of PCR-positive Acute Retinal Necrosis (ARN). The patient's clinical characteristics of the disease, and therapeutic approaches were assessed. Data from the medical records of 40 eyes of 40 patients were analyzed. The mean ± standard deviation (SD) of the age of the patients was 47.8 ± 14.1 years (16-84 years old). The median follow-up time was 160 days, with a range of 120-370 days. The mean ± SD of patients' primary and final BCVA was 1.24 ± 0.78 and 1.08 ± 0.86 LogMAR, respectively. The final BCVA increased significantly after the treatment in the last follow-up period in patients who did not undergo PPV (p = 0.029). Although, vision changes were not statistically significant in patients who underwent PPV (p = 0.549). 75% of our patients had a positive aqueous PCR for VZV, and the second most common causative agents were CMV and HSV (10% for each). Besides, rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (RRD) occurred in 25% of our patients. Our analysis showed that the presenting visual acuity and RRD occurrence are the significant prognostic factors for final blindness in ARN.

The role of a multicentre data repository in ocular inflammation: The Ocular Autoimmune Systemic Inflammatory Infectious Study (OASIS)

In the current literature, clinical registry cohorts related to ocular inflammation are few and far between, and there are none involving multi-continental international data. Many existing registries comprise administrative databases, data related to specific uveitic diseases, or are designed to address a particular clinical problem. The existing data, although useful and serving their intended purposes, are segmented and may not be sufficiently robust to design prognostication tools or draw epidemiological conclusions in the field of uveitis and ocular inflammation. To solve this, we have developed the Ocular Autoimmune Systemic Inflammatory Infectious Study (OASIS) Clinical Registry. OASIS collects prospective and retrospective data on patients with all types of ocular inflammatory conditions from centers all around the world. It is a primarily web-based platform with alternative offline modes of access. A comprehensive set of clinical data ranging from demographics, past medical history, clinical presentation, working diagnosis to visual outcomes are collected over a range of time points. Additionally, clinical images such as optical coherence tomography, fundus fluorescein angiography and indocyanine green angiography studies may be uploaded. Through the capturing of diverse, well-structured, and clinically meaningful data in a simplified and consistent fashion, OASIS will deliver a comprehensive and well organized data set ripe for data analysis. The applications of the registry are numerous, and include performing epidemiological analysis, monitoring drug side effects, and studying treatment safety efficacy. Furthermore, the data compiled in OASIS will be used to develop new classification and diagnostic systems, as well as treatment and prognostication guidelines for uveitis.

Laboratory Investigations in Infectious Uveitis

Laboratory investigations can play a significant role in the diagnosis and decision-making of infectious uveitis. Though direct demonstration of the infective organism remains the gold standard of diagnosis, it is not always possible with ocular tissues. Recent advancements in molecular techniques have made it possible to overcome these limitations and to identify the genomic DNA of pathogens associated with infectious uveitis. Techniques such as next-generation sequencing can analyze all DNA-based lifeforms, regardless of whether they are bacteria, fungi, viruses, or parasites and have been used in the laboratory diagnosis of intraocular inflammation. On the other hand, serological tests, though they dominate the diagnostic landscape of various infectious etiologies in uveitis in routine clinical practice, have varied specificities and sensitivities in different infectious uveitis. In this review, we focus on various methods of laboratory diagnosis of infectious uveitis and discuss the recent advances in molecular diagnosis and their role in various infectious clinical entities.

Posterior Herpetic Uveitis: A Comprehensive Review

PURPOSE

To report and illustrate the main clinical presentations of posterior herpetic uveitis.

METHODS

Narrative review.

RESULTS

The ocular manifestations of posterior herpetic uveitis include different clinical presentations. Herpes simplex and varicella zoster can cause acute retinal necrosis, progressive outer retinal necrosis, and non-necrotizing herpetic retinopathies. Cytomegalovirus has been associated with fulminant retinitis with confluent areas of retinal necrosis and retinal hemorrhages, indolent/granular retinitis, and frosted branch angiitis. These diverse clinical presentations are often associated with specific risk factors and different immunological profiles of the host.

CONCLUSIONS

Herpetic viruses can cause posterior uveitis, presenting various clinical findings. Specific ocular manifestations and the immunological status of the host can help to differentiate the various herpetic entities before laboratory tests confirm the diagnosis.

Acute Retinal Necrosis: Experience in a Reference Center in Santander - Colombia

INTRODUCTION

Acute retinal necrosis (ARN) is a severe eye disease demanding swift treatment to prevent blindness. Early action involving antiviral medications and corticosteroids is crucial for optimal visual outcomes.

OBJECTIVE

We present an ARN case series showcasing treatment experience and results.

METHODOLOGY

Patients diagnosed with ARN based on SUN Working Group 2021 criteria were included; all underwent comprehensive eye exams, PCR analysis, and imaging.

RESULTS

 Eight patients were studied; PCR confirmed ARN in six. Induction treatment, either oral valacyclovir (5/8) or intravenous acyclovir (3/8), lasted 10-14 days. Maintenance included oral valacyclovir (6/8), oral valganciclovir (2/8) for six months, along with intravitreal ganciclovir. Visual outcomes were similar for oral and intravenous therapies; poor baseline acuity and macular involvement tend to result in a worse final acuity.

CONCLUSIONS

Swift treatment is vital to ARN management. Our findings emphasize effective treatment strategies' role in visual prognosis.

ABBREVIATIONS

ACV: Acyclovir; BCVA: Best Corrected Visual Acuity; CMV: Cytomegalovirus; EBV: Epstein Barr Virus; FTA-ABS: Fluorescent treponemal antibody absorption test; HSV 1-2: Herpes simplex virus 1-2; HIV: Human Immunodeficiency Virus; IV-ACV: Intravenous- Acyclovir; PCR: Polymerase Chain Reaction;Tg: Toxoplasma gondii; VZV: Varicella Zoster Virus; VCV: Valacyclovir; VDRL: Venereal disease research laboratory test.

Choroidal Involvement and Chronic Macular Edema in Acute Retinal Necrosis: A Novel Finding and a Novel Treatment

Acute retinal necrosis (ARN) as the term suggests is recognized as necrotic inflammation of retina, in contrast to toxoplasma retinochoroiditis where involvement of choroid can be appreciated as choroidal thickening on optical coherence tomography scan during active stage. Secondly, sequelae of ARN, such as chronic anterior uveitis and cystoid macular edema, could be challenging to manage as steroid use in various forms poses a risk of virus reactivation. We present a case of ARN caused by varicella zoster virus with an initial confusing clinical picture with toxoplasma retinochoroiditis, documented with choroidal involvement. The patient also developed a chronic anterior uveitis with macular edema after resolution of ARN which was treated with topical interferon (IFN) alfa 2b therapy with successful outcome. This report supports the recently described choroidal involvement in ARN and suggests topical IFN as a novel treatment in management of chronic macular edema post ARN.

Long-term follow-up of acute retinal necrosis with retinal detachment secondary to herpes simplex virus type 2 with a successful visual outcome

A man in his early 20s presented with acute loss of vision in his only eye, the left eye (OS), and was on oral steroids. He had lost vision in his right eye during his childhood and the cause was unknown. There was no history of trauma. Best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) in OS was 20/100 and in the right eye was hand movements. OS showed non-granulomatous keratic precipitates on the cornea, anterior chamber flare 1+ and cell 1+, early cataract, vitreous haze and cells 2+ with nasal retinal detachment and superior full thickness retinitis. He underwent pars plana vitrectomy with intravitreal ganciclovir and barrage laser away from the necrotic retina. PCR for herpes simplex virus 2 was positive from the aqueous and vitreous sample. He was started on oral valacyclovir 1 g three times a day and continued on tapering dose of oral steroids. BCVA in OS at 6-month follow-up was 20/25.

First-line management of necrotizing herpetic retinitis by prioritizing the investigation of immune status and prognostic factors for poor visual outcomes

PURPOSE

To review management, treatment, and outcomes of patients with necrotizing herpetic retinitis (NHR) to propose an algorithm for first-line management of NHR.

METHODS

Retrospective evaluation of a series of patients with NHR at our tertiary center between 2012 and 2021 using demographic, clinical, ophthalmologic, virological, therapeutic, and prognostic characteristics was performed. Patients were classified by NHR type: acute retinal necrosis (ARN), progressive outer retinal necrosis (PORN), cytomegalovirus (CMV) retinitis.

RESULTS

Forty-one patients with NHR were included: 59% with ARN, 7% with PORN, and 34% with CMV retinitis. All patients with CMV retinitis and PORN were immunocompromised versus 21% of patients with ARN. CMV infection was found in 14 (34%) patients, varicella zoster virus infection in 14 (34%) patients, herpes simplex virus type 2 infection in 8 (20%) and type 1 infection in 5 (12%) patients. Intravenous antiviral therapy was received by 98% of patients and intravitreal antiviral injections by 90% of patients. The overall complication rate during follow-up was 83% of eyes. Most frequent complications were retinal detachment (33% eyes) and retinal break (29% eyes). Prognostic factors for poor visual outcomes were pre-existing monocular vision loss in contralateral eye among 17% of patients, bilateral NHR in 17% of patients, posterior pole involvement in 46% of eyes, and involvement > 2 retinal quadrants in 46% of eyes.

CONCLUSIONS

The visual prognosis of patients with NHR remains poor. Prompt investigation of immune status and presence of factors justifying intravitreal antiviral injections must be prioritized to initiate and adapt management while awaiting causative virus confirmation.

Stepwise approach for fundus imaging in the diagnosis and management of posterior uveitis

An array of retinochoroid imaging modalities aid in comprehensive evaluation of the immunopathological changes in the retina and choroid, forming the core component for the diagnosis and management of inflammatory disorders such as uveitis. The recent technological breakthroughs have led to the development of imaging platforms that can evaluate the layers of retina and choroid and the structural and functional alteration in these tissues. Ophthalmologists heavily rely on imaging modalities such as dye-based angiographies (fluorescein angiography and indocyanine green angiography), optical coherence tomography, fundus autofluorescence, as well as dye-less angiography such as optical coherence tomography angiograph,y for establishing a precise diagnosis and understanding the pathophysiology of the diseases. Furthermore, these tools are now being deployed with a 'multimodal' approach for swift and accurate diagnosis. In this comprehensive review, we outline the imaging platforms used for evaluation of posterior uveitis and discuss the organized, algorithmic approach for the assessment of the disorders. Additionally, we provide an insight into disease-specific characteristic pathological changes and the established strategies to rule out disorders with overlapping features on imaging.

Retinal vasculopathy following varicella zoster virus infection

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Varicella zoster virus (VZV) ocular infection can manifest purely as a vasculopathy that leads to retinal arteriole occlusion, without any retinitis or vasculitis. This review summarizes our current knowledge of such VZV ocular infection phenotype, incorporating initial descriptions from 1988. We describe the pathogenesis and VZV's manifestations in the retina using fundus photography, fundus fluorescein angiography, optical coherence tomography (OCT) and optical coherence tomography angiography (OCTA). Laboratory investigations, diagnostic procedures, prognoses, and treatment options are also being reviewed.

RECENT FINDINGS

Ten case reports where VZV retinal vasculopathy was the primary feature observed after varicella or zoster rash are described. The retinal arteriole, cilioretinal artery, branches of retinal artery, central retinal artery and ophthalmic artery were found to be areas of more rarely affected, neither in the form of vasculitis nor retinitis. Diagnosis is typically made from positive polymerase chain reaction (PCR) for VZV from extracted intraocular fluid or positive serum or cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) anti-VZV immunoglobulin G antibody in the context of compatible ocular findings. In addition, retinal vasculopathy occurring in the setting of confirmed varicella or zoster rashes could be considered potentially pathognomonic. Pathological concepts, including direct VZV infection of affected tissue, persistent inflammation, and/or virus-induced hypercoagulability are also discussed.

SUMMARY

VZV may produce a wide spectrum of ocular manifestations with isolated VZV retinal vasculopathy being a rarer presentation. A prompt diagnosis followed by an early treatment of systemic acyclovir with or without corticosteroids is the mainstay of treatment.

The standardisation of uveitis nomenclature (SUN) project

The uveitides are a collection of over 30 diseases characterised by intraocular inflammation. Previous work demonstrated that the agreement among uveitis experts on diagnosis was modest at best with some pairs of experts having chance alone agreement on selected diseases. The Standardisation of Uveitis Nomenclature (SUN) is a17-year collaboration among experts in uveitis, ocular image grading, informatics, and machine learning to improve clinical and translational uveitis research. The SUN "Developing Classification Criteria for the Uveitides" project used a rigorous, multi-phase approach to develop classification criteria for 25 of the most common uveitic diseases. The project's phases were: (1) informatics; (2) case collection; (3) case selection; (4) machine learning; and (5) consensus review and publication. The results were classification criteria with a high degree of accuracy (93.3%-99.3% depending on anatomic class of the uveitis), the goal of which is to form the basis for future uveitis research.

Advances in the microbiological diagnosis of herpetic retinitis

Viral retinitis associated with herpesvirus is one of the most severe forms of uveitis and is a potentially sight-threatening ophthalmologic disease. The prognosis is poor and a rapid and aggressive management is necessary to improve the visual and sometimes vital prognosis of these patients. The treatments used are not without side effects, while many differential diagnoses exist, such as toxoplasmic retinochoroiditis, syphilitic retinitis, endogenous endophthalmitis and intraocular lymphoma. Causatives viruses are herpes simplex virus, varicella-zoster virus, and cytomegalovirus, which require rapid detection in ocular fluid, mainly aqueous humor. However, only a small amount of intraocular fluid is available for analysis. Advances in microbiological diagnostic techniques therefore were key factors in improving the management of these diseases. Historically, the diagnosis was based on immunological tests but more recently advances in molecular biology, in particular polymerase chain reaction, have played a crucial role to obtain a reliable and rapid diagnosis of viral retinitis associated with herpesvirus, as discussed in this review.

Acute retinal necrosis: A mini review

Acute retinal necrosis is a rare but potentially devastating disease. Even in the era of modern medicine, retinal detachment is a frequent complication leading to vison loss, as well as phthisis bulbi. Whereas IV acyclovir still remains the standard of care, high doses of valacyclovir with/without additional intravitreal injections of foscarnet have been used. In an attempt to reduce the retinal detachment rate, prophylactic laser treatment and early vitrectomy have been proposed. In this article, we aim to review current diagnostic and treatment modalities.

Evaluation of the SUN Classification Criteria for Uveitides in an Academic Uveitis Practice

PURPOSE

To evaluate the new Standardization of Uveitis Nomenclature (SUN) classification criteria for uveitides by applying them to patients in an academic uveitis practice.

DESIGN

Evaluation of classification criteria.

METHODS

The charts of all patients attending the uveitis service at the University of Colorado Hospital between January 1, 2013, and December 31, 2020, were reviewed. Patients with scleritis, ocular cicatricial pemphigoid, and peripheral ulcerative keratitis were excluded. We attempted to classify each patient's uveitis using the SUN classification criteria. Classification attempts were made within the relevant anatomical or infectious categories for their pathology but did not necessarily have to match their clinical diagnosis by a uveitis specialist. We recorded whether classification was possible as well as their clinical diagnosis by a uveitis specialist.

RESULTS

All patients attending the uveitis clinic at our academic institution between January 1, 2013, and December 31, 2020, were reviewed. Of the 1143 patients with uveitis, 572 (50.0%) had a disease that was not listed in the SUN classification system, and so no attempt to classify these patients was possible. Of the remaining 571 patients, 522 (91.4%) were able to be classified by SUN and in 492 (94.3%) of the 522 cases, their SUN classification matched their clinical diagnosis by a uveitis specialist.

CONCLUSIONS

Half of the patients at an academic uveitis practice had a disease for which no SUN classification criteria existed. In cases where classification by SUN could be attempted, the system performed well and generally agreed with their clinical diagnosis.

Uveitis Patterns and Severity: An Epidemiologic Study from a Tertiary Care Private Referral Center in Buenos Aires, Argentina

PURPOSE

To report uveitis' spectrum in a private practice cohort in the city of Buenos Aires, Argentina.

METHODS

Retrospective review at Instituto de la Visión (November 2011-October 2015). Standard demographics, ethnicity and Native American aboriginal ancestry were recorded.

RESULTS

Among 212 patients, median age 45 (6-97), 10% pediatric, 35% bilateral, 72% non-idiopathic, 36% infectious. Anterior uveitis presented in 50%, followed by posterior (32%), intermediate (9%) and panuveitis (8%). Frequent visits (≥ 6 per year) needed by 29%: posterior, non-idiopathic disease with 79% systemic immunosuppression requirement was their main presentation. Native American aboriginal ancestry was reported by 22.64% of the whole cohort and 37% of frequent visits' subgroup.

CONCLUSIONS

Unilateral, non-idiopathic, non-infectious anterior uveitis was the most frequent presentation, in agreement with reports coming from western developed cities. The multi-racial Argentinian population with specific Native American aboriginal ancestry might contribute to certain forms of posterior uveitis and their response to treatment.

Case Report: Herpes Simplex Virus Type 2 Acute Retinal Necrosis With Viral Encephalitis in Children

Background

Few cases concerning acute retinal necrosis with viral encephalitis in children have been reported, especially cases where the fundus cannot be identified due to severe vitreous opacity in the early stage that makes diagnosis difficult.

Methods

We conducted a retrospective review of an unusual case of herpes simplex virus-2 (HSV-2) acute retinal necrosis with viral encephalitis in an immunocompetent child, along with a review of relevant literature published up to September 2021.

Result

An 11-year-old girl presented with an approximate 20-day history of ocular redness and decreased visual acuity in the left eye. Examination revealed anterior uveitis and vitreous opacity in the left eye. An anterior chamber tap was performed because the fundus could not be observed clearly, and the aqueous humor was positive for HSV-2 DNA. Cerebrospinal fluid also tested positive for HSV-2. She was diagnosed with acute retinal necrosis syndrome and viral encephalitis. The condition was controlled with timely antiviral and steroid therapy. She was also treated with prophylactic laser therapy to prevent retinal detachment during subsequent follow-up. The pathogenesis, diagnosis, and treatment of HSV-2 acute retinal necrosis in children and the association between acute retinal necrosis and viral encephalitis are further discussed, based on published literature.

Conclusion

HSV-2-related pediatric acute retinal necrosis may be due to the acquisition of subclinical infection with HSV-2 during parturition, followed by reactivation of the virus latent in the body on account of certain factors. Moreover, it may be complicated with viral encephalitis. For suspected cases with invisible fundus, early intraocular fluid examination is especially helpful for differential diagnosis. Early diagnosis, early treatment, and timely prophylactic laser treatment to prevent retinal detachment are key to a better prognosis. Physicians need to pay attention to such suspected cases during diagnosis and treatment.

Artificial Intelligence and Imaging Processing in Optical Coherence Tomography and Digital Images in Uveitis

INTRODUCTION

Computer vision, understood as the area of science that trains computers to interpret digital images through both artificial intelligence (AI) and classical algorithms, has significantly advanced the analysis and interpretation of optical coherence tomography (OCT) in retina research. The aim of this review is to summarise the recent advances of computer vision in imaging processing in uveitis, with a particular focus in optical coherence tomography images.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Literature review.

RESULTS

The development of computer vision to assist uveitis diagnosis and prognosis is still undergoing, but important efforts have been made in the field.

CONCLUSION

The automatising of image processing in uveitis could be fundamental to establish objective and standardised outcomes for future clinical trials. In addition, it could help to better understand the disease and its progression.

Acute Retinal Necrosis: Clinical Features, Diagnostic Pitfalls, Treatment, and Outcome of an Insidious Disease in Children. Case Report and Review of the Literature

OBJECTIVE

This study aims to explore clinical features, diagnostic work-up, treatment, and outcomes of pediatric patients with acute retinal necrosis (ARN), and to propose a standardized management of this condition in childhood.

METHODS

Clinical manifestations, diagnostic work-up, and treatment of three pediatric cases with ARN were analyzed. Furthermore, a review of the literature was performed from January 1990 to November 2021, focused on 1) clinical presentation; 2) differential diagnosis, including both infectious and non-infectious conditions; 3) key role of diagnostic techniques; and 4) currently available treatments.

RESULTS

Data from 72 children with ARN (69 from literature and 3 from our center) were analyzed. The most frequent presenting symptoms were red eye resistant to topical treatment (57%) and altered vision (58%), 25 patients had bilateral involvement. In 30% a known history of herpetic infection was reported. PCR testing on anterior chamber and/or vitreous sampling was performed in 46 cases (64%) and was diagnostic in 88% of them, with herpes simplex virus (HSV) 2 being the most frequently identified pathogen (57%). All patients underwent systemic antiviral therapy (16% only oral); adjunctive intravitreal injections were performed in 21% of them.

CONCLUSIONS

ARN is a rare but severe ocular infection presenting as a panuveitis with occlusive retinal vasculitis and peripheral retinal necrosis. Varicella-zoster virus and HSV 1-2 are most frequently implicated. Due to a high incidence of rhegmatogenous retinal detachment and optic atrophy, ARN has a poor prognosis with a potentially severe impact on visual function. Although a prompt recognition is crucial to prevent complications, ARN diagnosis in children is still challenging.

[Development of classification criteria for uveitis by the standardization of uveitis nomenclature (SUN) working group]

Hintergrund

Die Standardization of Uveitis Nomenclature (SUN) Working Group ist eine internationale Expertenkommission, die das Ziel verfolgt, eine standardisierte und international anerkannte Terminologie für das Gebiet der Uveitis zu erarbeiten. Dies erscheint angesichts der Forderung nach evidenzbasierter Medizin gerade bei relativ seltenen Erkrankungen wie der Uveitis wichtig.

Methoden

Unter Verwendung formaler Konsensustechniken wurde eine Datenbank von > 4000 Uveitispatienten erstellt, bei denen zuvor eine Mehrheitsübereinstimmung in der Diagnose erzielt wurde. Die Patientendaten wurden innerhalb der Uveitissubklasse analysiert und in einen Trainingssatz und einen Validierungssatz aufgeteilt. Mit maschinellem Lernen (ML) wurden multinomiale logistische Regressionen mit Lasso-Regularisierung auf dem Trainingssatz durchgeführt. Die Genauigkeit der Regeln, die entwickelt wurden, um die Kriterien des maschinellen Lernens auszudrücken, wurde von einem maskierten Beobachter in einer 10 %igen Zufallsstichprobe bewertet.

Ergebnisse

Die Schätzungen der Gesamtgenauigkeit nach Uveitisklassen im Validierungsset waren für alle Uveitisformen hoch: anteriore Uveitiden 96,7 % (95 %-Konfidenzintervall [CI] 92,4–98,6); intermediäre Uveitiden 99,3 % (95 %-CI 96,1–99,9); posteriore Uveitiden 98,0 % (95 %-CI 94,3–99,3); Panuveitiden 94,0 % (95 %-CI 89,0–96,8) und infektiöse posteriore Uveitiden/Panuveitiden 93,3 % (95 %-CI 89,1–96,3).

Schlussfolgerungen

Es werden Klassifikationskriterien präsentiert, die einen hohen Grad an Genauigkeit (geringe Fehlklassifikationsraten) aufweisen und sich daher gut für die künftige klinische und translationale Forschung eignen.