Disparities in Eye Care Utilization During the COVID-19 Pandemic

Predictors of Health Care Disparities in Fuchs Dystrophy Treatment Using the IRIS Registry

PURPOSE

To evaluate associations between sociodemographic factors and surgical management in patients with Fuchs Endothelial Corneal Dystrophy (FECD).

METHODS

Patients >40 years old with FECD diagnosis and subsequent corneal edema between 2007 and 2020 were identified from the American Academy of Ophthalmology IRIS Registry (Intelligent Research in Sight). Multivariable Cox proportional hazards models were fit to examine the relationships between sociodemographic variables and time from FECD diagnosis to penetrating keratoplasty (PK) and endothelial keratoplasty (EK)/PK.

RESULTS

A total of 20,366 patients with FECD diagnosis and subsequent corneal edema were identified. Of the 4313 patients who underwent either EK or PK (any surgery), 374 patients underwent PK, 4037 underwent EK, and 98 received both interventions. After controlling for age, sex, and insurance status, Black or African American patients were 1.48 times as likely (hazard ratio 1.48, 95% confidence intervals (CI), 1.06-2.07) to undergo PK as compared with White patients and were less likely to receive any surgery (HR 0.83, 95% CI, 0.74-0.94). Asian patients were less likely (HR: 0.57, 95% CI, 0.43-0.75) to undergo any surgery. Female patients were more likely to undergo PK and less likely to undergo any surgery than male patients, and older patients were less likely to undergo any surgery with each increasing decade of life. There were no significant differences when stratified by insurance type.

CONCLUSIONS

Age, sex, race and ethnicity, and insurance type are associated with varying rates of different surgical interventions for FECD.

Implementation of deep learning artificial intelligence in vision-threatening disease screenings for an underserved community during COVID-19

INTRODUCTION

Age-related macular degeneration, diabetic retinopathy, and glaucoma are vision-threatening diseases that are leading causes of vision loss. Many studies have validated deep learning artificial intelligence for image-based diagnosis of vision-threatening diseases. Our study prospectively investigated deep learning artificial intelligence applications in student-run non-mydriatic screenings for an underserved, primarily Hispanic community during COVID-19.

METHODS

Five supervised student-run community screenings were held in West New York, New Jersey. Participants underwent non-mydriatic 45-degree retinal imaging by medical students. Images were uploaded to a cloud-based deep learning artificial intelligence for vision-threatening disease referral. An on-site tele-ophthalmology grader and remote clinical ophthalmologist graded images, with adjudication by a senior ophthalmologist to establish the gold standard diagnosis, which was used to assess the performance of deep learning artificial intelligence.

RESULTS

A total of 385 eyes from 195 screening participants were included (mean age 52.43  ±  14.5 years, 40.0% female). A total of 48 participants were referred for at least one vision-threatening disease. Deep learning artificial intelligence marked 150/385 (38.9%) eyes as ungradable, compared to 10/385 (2.6%) ungradable as per the human gold standard (p < 0.001). Deep learning artificial intelligence had 63.2% sensitivity, 94.5% specificity, 32.0% positive predictive value, and 98.4% negative predictive value in vision-threatening disease referrals. Deep learning artificial intelligence successfully referred all 4 eyes with multiple vision-threatening diseases. Deep learning artificial intelligence graded images (35.6  ±  13.3 s) faster than the tele-ophthalmology grader (129  ±  41.0) and clinical ophthalmologist (68  ±  21.9, p < 0.001).

DISCUSSION

Deep learning artificial intelligence can increase the efficiency and accessibility of vision-threatening disease screenings, particularly in underserved communities. Deep learning artificial intelligence should be adaptable to different environments. Consideration should be given to how deep learning artificial intelligence can best be utilized in a real-world application, whether in computer-aided or autonomous diagnosis.

A Systematic Review of Teleophthalmology Services Post-COVID-19 Pandemic in New Zealand, the United Kingdom, Australia, the United States of America, and Canada

Background: This systematic review of teleophthalmology services in Australia, the United States of America (USA), Canada, and the United Kingdom (UK) during the COVID-19 pandemic is aimed to evaluate changes in teleophthalmology, comparing them to New Zealand (NZ). Methods: A literature search of electronic databases Scopus, Proquest, PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, Google Scholar, and Google was conducted using search terms: telemedicine, ophthalmology, teleophthalmology/teleophthalmology, and COVID/COVID-19/coronavirus/covid-pandemic. Studies describing teleophthalmology services created in response to COVID-19 restrictions from March 1, 2020, to January 31, 2024, were analyzed. Results: Of the articles, 37 describing 29 discrete teleophthalmology services were included. There were 15 services in the USA, seven in the UK, two in Canada, two in Australia, and three in NZ. The models of care in the USA were well described, and teleophthalmology was used for general, external, anterior segment, neuro-ophthalmology, and oculoplastic consults, as well as for grading of fundus images in the emergency department setting. In the UK, teleophthalmology was used for general eye care, oculoplastics, and pediatric ophthalmology. In Australia, teleophthalmology was used for postglaucoma surgery monitoring of Intraocular Pressure. In NZ, teleophthalmology was used for general eye consults and triaging, but no formal models were described. Conclusion: COVID-19 offered a unique opportunity for re-examination and expansion of teleophthalmology services globally. Video-based and home-screening teleophthalmology services are feasible but have limitations. Investing in multidisciplinary and community-based technology partnerships can create more equitable teleophthalmology care models (to complement and, when necessary, replace traditional in-person consults), within existing frameworks, making eye care more accessible and efficient.

Recent advances in neuro-ophthalmology

This review article represents a collaborative effort across continents, bringing together the latest developments in neuro-ophthalmology with a focus on innovative diagnostic and therapeutic modalities that are shaping the future of the field. Among the most significant advancements is the rise of optical coherence tomography (OCT), now recognized as an indispensable tool in neuro-ophthalmological research, providing unparalleled insights into optic nerve and central nervous system pathologies. Gene therapy, particularly for conditions such as Leber's hereditary optic neuropathy, marks a new frontier in personalized medicine, offering hope for previously untreatable conditions. The article also examines the transformative role of telemedicine and artificial intelligence (AI) in clinical practice, which are revolutionizing patient care and enhancing diagnostic precision. Furthermore, it highlights the impact of novel serological biomarkers on the understanding and management of immune-mediated optic neuritis, and discusses the introduction of new therapeutic agents like Tocilizumab and Teprotumumab, which are redefining treatment paradigms. Collectively, these advancements reflect the profound influence of modern medicine on neuro-ophthalmology, paving the way for improved patient outcomes and fostering new avenues for research and clinical practice.

Telemedicine in Eye Care During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Review of Patient & Physician Perspectives

Purpose

There has been an increase in the adoption of telemedicine during the COVID-19 pandemic. This review used systematic search and review criteria to assess the literature on patient and physician perspectives toward telemedicine for vision care during the pandemic.

Methods

We conducted a comprehensive search on PubMed, Embase, and Scopus using relevant MeSH terms to identify peer-reviewed studies examining telemedicine use in eye care during the pandemic. The search strategy encompassed three key concepts: COVID-19 or pandemic, telehealth or telemedicine, and eye care. Further screening of references and similar articles was conducted to identify additional relevant studies.

Results

We identified 24 relevant studies published between 2020 and 2022. Of these, 15 focused on patients' perspectives, while 12 explored physicians' perspectives. Predominantly cross-sectional in design, these studies were mainly conducted during the initial wave of the pandemic (March 2020 to June 2020), primarily in urban locations and hospital settings. Patients were satisfied with telemedicine and considered it equally effective to in-person visits. Patients believed telemedicine was convenient, improved eye care access, and a beneficial triage tool. Physicians acknowledged telemedicine's convenience for follow-up assessment and its ability to expand the capacity for emergency cases. However, both patients and physicians voiced concerns about the absence of ancillary examination and technological challenges.

Conclusion

Our review highlights the positive impact of telemedicine in eye care during the pandemic. Nonetheless, most studies were limited in sample size. They did not delve into potential disparities based on race/ethnicity, socioeconomic status, and geographic location, factors that could influence patient attitudes toward telemedicine. Further research is warranted to validate the findings from our selected studies and explore factors that influence the implementation of telemedicine, particularly across various eye care subspecialties.

Assessment of a Telehealth Platform in Evaluating the Urgency of Ophthalmical Consultation in the Middle East and North Africa Region: The Red Flags of Retinal Detachment

Background: The availability and utilization of telehealth services have been rapidly increasing in the past decade, which paved the way for ophthalmological care to be offered more easily and conveniently. However, the proficiency of telehealth in the context of ophthalmical care still requires further studies to prove its effectiveness. This study examined the proficiency of general practitioners in a telemedicine platform in identifying red flag symptoms, suggestive of retinal detachment, and devising optimal management strategies. Methods: Our cross-sectional study used chat-based consultations on Altibbi Telemedicine platform (2018-2023) to study ophthalmical patients presenting with "blurred vision" or "blindness." Those endorsing red flag symptoms were categorized as having "positive symptomatology" and those reporting none as having "negative symptomatology." Management plans were classified as referral or reassuring. Statistical analysis was performed using IBM's Statistical Package for Social Sciences to examine associations between symptomatology and other variables. p values below 0.05 were considered statistically significant. Results: Five hundred and fifty (n = 550) patients with a mean age 22.5 ± 13 years were included. Patients expressing positive symptomatology were more likely to be referred relative to those expressing negative symptomatology (81% vs. 61%, p < 0.001). No significant difference was found between genders and referral (p = 0.053) or age and referral (p = 0.231). Multivariate regression showed a significant correlation between positive symptoms and referral (adjusted odds ratio [aOR]: 2.0; 95% confidence interval [95% CI]: 1.3-3.3), none between gender (aOR: 1.5; 95% CI: 0.9-2.2) or age (aOR: 1.0; 95% CI: 0.9-1.1) and referral odds. Conclusion: The telemedicine platform studied is effective in referring cases with red flag symptoms to urgent care, regardless of age and gender.

Exploring Pediatric Vision Care: Insights from Five Years of Referral Cases in the UCI Eye Mobile and Implications of COVID-19

PURPOSE

To analyze referral rates, patient demographics, referral indications, and the impact of socioeconomic factors on ocular health from the University of California Irvine (UCI) Eye Mobile for Children, particularly during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic.

METHODS

A retrospective chart review was performed on de-identified records of children examined on the UCI Eye Mobile. GraphPad Prism 10.0.0 and Python software were used for statistical analyses.

RESULTS

In the academic years from 2018 to 2022, 3,619 children received comprehensive eye examinations on the UCI Eye Mobile. Among them, 76 were referred to a pediatric ophthalmologist. The majority of these children were Hispanic (72.6%, 54 of 74), followed by Asian (10.9%, 8 of 74). A significant proportion (82.9%, 63 of 76) attended school districts with median incomes below that of Orange County. Statistically significant differences were found in age (P = .001; pre-COVID: 3.98 ± 1.08 years vs COVID: 5.75 ± 2.92 years) and gender (P = .023; pre-COVID female: 31 of 41 vs COVID female: 15 of 32) between the pre-COVID and COVID years. Additionally, there were significant differences in the proportion of children with hyperopia with astigmatism between the pre-COVID and COVID years (P = .044; pre-COVID: 23 of 40 vs COVID: 12 of 35). The most common indications for ophthalmologist referrals were for strabismus evaluation/treatment (28.9%, 22 of 76), followed by abnormal cup-to-disc ratio (21.1%, 16 of 76).

CONCLUSIONS

The study highlights the pivotal role of the UCI Eye Mobile for children in identifying ocular conditions needing referrals to subspecialty care. The majority of children needing these referrals attended schools in lower economic communities. Additionally, the COVID-19 pandemic appears to have influenced the demographic and clinical characteristics. [J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus. 2024;61(5):309-316.].

Risk factors affecting the utilization of eye care services evaluated by the CDC's behavior risk factor surveillance system from 2018 to 2021

When thinking about major health concerns in the U.S. and around the world, eye care ranks lower compared to cardiovascular disease, cancer, and diabetes. However, people do not think about the direct connection between diabetes and eye health. Untreated diabetes can lead to visual impairments such as blindness or difficulty seeing. Studies have found that eye health associated with nutrition, occupational exposure, diabetes, high blood pressure, and heart disease are some of the known risk factors. This study aimed to identify the potential risk factors that are associated with visual impairment (VI). The data used for this analysis were obtained from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) - Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS) from 2018 to 2021. We found important characteristics, such as the U.S. region, general health perception, employment status, income status, age, and health insurance source, that are associated with VI. Our study confirmed that the common demographical factors including age, race/ethnicity, the U.S. region, and gender are associated with VI. The study also highlights associations with additional risk factors such as health insurance source, general health perceptions, employment status, and income status. Using this information, we can reach out to communities with large numbers of individuals experiencing vision challenges and help educate them on prevention and treatment protocols, thereby effectively addressing VI and blindness challenges within our communities, neighborhoods, and finally, the broader society.

Factors Associated With Laboratory Test Negativity Following a Transition in Specimen Collection in Microbial Keratitis Cases

PURPOSE

Negative laboratory results make targeting microbial keratitis treatment difficult. We investigated factors associated with laboratory negativity in patients with microbial keratitis in the context of a transition to a new specimen collection method.

METHODS

Microbial keratitis patients with associated laboratory tests were identified in the electronic health record of a tertiary care facility from August 2012 to April 2022. Patient demographics and laboratory results were obtained. Random sampling of 50% of charts was performed to assess the impact of the ocular history and pretreatment measures. The relationship between probability of negative laboratory results with demographics, ocular history, pretreatment measures, and utilization of a new specimen collection method (i.e. ESwab) was evaluated by multivariable logistic regression.

RESULTS

Of 3395 microbial keratitis patients identified, 31% (n = 1051) had laboratory tests. Laboratory testing increased over time (slope = 2.5% per year, p < 0.001; 19.6% in 2013 to 42.2% in 2021). Laboratory negative rate increased over time (slope = 2.2% per year, p = 0.022; 48.5% in 2013 to 62.3% in 2021). Almost one-third of patients (31.2%, n = 164) were pretreated with steroids. Over two-thirds of patients were pretreated with antibiotics (69.5%, n = 367). 56.5% (n = 297) of patients were outside referrals. In multivariable regression, patients with corticosteroid pretreatment had lower odds of negative laboratory results (odds ratio [OR] = 0.49, p = 0.001). There were higher odds of negative laboratory results for every additional antibiotic prescribed to a patient prior to presentation (OR = 1.30, p = 0.006) and for specimens collected using ESwabs (OR = 1.69, p = 0.005). Age, prior eye trauma, outside referrals, and contact lens wear were not significantly associated with negative laboratory results.

CONCLUSION

More microbial keratitis associated laboratory tests are being taken over time. Over 60% of tests were negative by 2022. Factors associated with negative laboratory test results included pretreatment with antibiotics and specimens collected with the new collection method.

Determinants of non-attendance at face-to-face and telemedicine ophthalmic consultations

BACKGROUND/AIMS

Evaluation of telemedicine care models has highlighted its potential for exacerbating healthcare inequalities. This study seeks to identify and characterise factors associated with non-attendance across face-to-face and telemedicine outpatient appointments.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study at a tertiary-level ophthalmic institution in the UK, between 1 January 2019 and 31 October 2021. Logistic regression modelled non-attendance against sociodemographic, clinical and operational exposure variables for all new patient registrations across five delivery modes: asynchronous, synchronous telephone, synchronous audiovisual and face to face prior to the pandemic and face to face during the pandemic.

RESULTS

A total of 85 924 patients (median age 55 years, 54.4% female) were newly registered. Non-attendance differed significantly by delivery mode: (9.0% face to face prepandemic, 10.5% face to face during the pandemic, 11.7% asynchronous and 7.8%, synchronous during pandemic). Male sex, greater levels of deprivation, a previously cancelled appointment and not self-reporting ethnicity were strongly associated with non-attendance across all delivery modes. Individuals identifying as black ethnicity had worse attendance in synchronous audiovisual clinics (adjusted OR 4.24, 95% CI 1.59 to 11.28) but not asynchronous. Those not self-reporting their ethnicity were from more deprived backgrounds, had worse broadband access and had significantly higher non-attendance across all modes (all p<0.001).

CONCLUSION

Persistent non-attendance among underserved populations attending telemedicine appointments highlights the challenge digital transformation faces for reducing healthcare inequalities. Implementation of new programmes should be accompanied by investigation into the differential health outcomes of vulnerable populations.

Challenges of Using Telemedicine in Hospital Specialty Consultations during the COVID-19 Pandemic in Portugal According to a Panel of Experts

INTRODUCTION

The COVID-19 pandemic has accelerated the adoption of telemedicine as a means of reducing face-to-face contact and protecting professionals and patients. In Portugal, the number of hospital telemedicine consultations has significantly increased. However, the rapid implementation of telemedicine has also led to disparities in access to these services, resulting in inequalities in healthcare delivery. The aim of this study was to identify the main challenges to accessing hospital medical specialty consultations through telemedicine in Portugal during the COVID-19 pandemic. Additionally, this study aimed to establish a consensus on possible solutions for the challenges which were identified.

METHODS

This study used the nominal group technique, which involved a panel of 10 experts. The panel generated a total of 71 ideas, which were then categorized into three groups: A) challenges relating to patients, which impact access to hospital-based medical specialty consultations through telemedicine; B) challenges relating to professionals, institutions and health systems, which impact access to hospital medical specialty consultations through telemedicine; C) recommendations to overcome the challenges faced in adopting telemedicine solutions. Each of the ideas was assessed, scored and ranked based on its relevance considering the study objectives.

RESULTS

This study identified several significant challenges that impacted the adoption of telemedicine in Portugal during the COVID-19 pandemic. The challenges that related to patients (A) that were deemed the most relevant were low digital literacy, lack of information about telemedicine processes, low familiarity with technologies and distrust about the quality of services; the challenges that impacted healthcare professionals, institutions, and health systems (B) and were deemed the most relevant were the lack of integration of telemedicine in the patient's journey, low motivation to adopt telemedicine solutions, poor interoperability between systems, and the absence of the necessary technological equipment. The most relevant recommendations (C) included investing in healthcare institutions, developing clear guidelines for the safety and quality of telemedicine practices, and incorporating telemedicine into the curricula of health professions.

CONCLUSION

This study identified several challenges that impacted the adoption and implementation of telemedicine services for hospital care in Portugal during the pandemic period. These challenges were related to digital health literacy, technological and operational conditions, and reluctance in technological adoption. To overcome these challenges, training programs for healthcare professionals and patients may be necessary, along with investment in technological infrastructures, interoperability between systems, effective communication strategies and the strengthening of specific regulations.

Evolution of Disparities in Outpatient Ophthalmic Care at a Tertiary Care Center in California at the Beginning of and One Year into the COVID-19 Public Health Emergency

PURPOSE

To compare disparities in outpatient ophthalmic care during early and later periods of the COVID-19 public health emergency.

METHODS

This cross-sectional study compared non-peri-operative outpatient ophthalmology visits by unique patients at an adult ophthalmology practice affiliated with a tertiary-care academic medical center in the Western US during three time periods: pre-COVID (3/15/19-4/15/19), early-COVID (3/15/20-4/15/20), and late-COVID (3/15/21-4/15/21). Differences in participant demographics, barriers to care, visit modality (telehealth, in person), and subspeciality of care were studied using unadjusted and adjusted models.

RESULTS

There were 3095, 1172 and 3338 unique patient-visits during pre-COVID, early-COVID and late-COVID (overall age 59.5 ± 20.5 years, 57% female, 41.8% White, 25.9% Asian, 16.1% Hispanic). There were disparities in patient age (55.4 ± 21.8 vs. 60.2 ± 19.9 years), race (21.9% vs. 26.9% Asian), ethnicity (18.3% Hispanic vs. 15.2% Hispanic), and insurance (35.9% vs. 45.1% Medicare) as well as changes in modality (14.2% vs. 0% telehealth) and subspecialty (61.6% vs. 70.1% internal exam specialty) in early-COVID vs. pre-COVID (p < .05 for all). In late-COVID, only insurance (42.7% vs. 45.1% Medicare) and modality of care (1.8% vs. 0% telehealth) persisted as differences compared to pre-COVID.

CONCLUSIONS

There were disparities in patients receiving outpatient ophthalmology care during early-COVID that returned close to pre-COVID baseline one year later. These results suggest that there has not been a lasting positive or negative disruptive effect of the COVID-19 pandemic on disparities in outpatient ophthalmic care.

Demographic and socioeconomic disparities in the hybrid ophthalmology telemedicine model

IMPORTANCE

As telemedicine use expands, it is important to evaluate demographic and socioeconomic disparities among patients receiving ophthalmic care through new hybrid telemedicine models.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate whether there are demographic and socioeconomic disparities in the delivery of the hybrid telemedicine model.

DESIGN

Retrospective, cross-sectional, case-control analysis of patient encounters from April to December 2020.

SETTING

A single, academic, hospital-based eye clinic in Boston, Massachusetts.

METHODS

Electronic medical records of all patient encounters from April to December 2020 were reviewed and categorized into hybrid, virtual-only, and standard in-person visits. Patient-level data for all visits were extracted including age, sex, race/ethnicity, primary language, Area Deprivation Index (ADI), insurance type, and marital status. Visit-level data for all hybrid visits were also extracted from the medical record including the visit dates and patient adherence. Demographics for the cohort of patients with at least one no-show visit were compared with demographics for the cohort of patients who only had completed visits. The primary study outcomes were the differences in demographic characteristics between the hybrid visit show and no-show groups. The secondary outcomes included demographic characteristics of patients who did not complete their hybrid visit versus a time-matched cohort of patients who did not complete their standard in-person visit. Continuous variables for patient characteristics were compared with independent samples t-tests and categorical variables were compared using Pearson chi-square tests. Multivariate logistic regression was used to examine the differences between the cohorts. Variables with missing values other than suppressed ADI values were imputed using multiple imputations by chained equations.

RESULTS

Of a total of 1025 patients who were scheduled for a hybrid visit, 145 (14.1%) patients failed to complete their visit. Primary language and insurance were found to be statistically different between patients who completed and did not complete their hybrid visits. More English speakers and fewer Haitian Creole speakers completed their hybrid visits (p = 0.007) while more patients with private insurance and fewer patients with Medicaid completed their hybrid telemedicine visits (p = 0.026). No associations were found between hybrid telemedicine visit adherence and age, sex, race/ethnicity, marital status, or ADI. When the 145 patients who failed to complete their hybrid visits were compared to a time-matched cohort of patients who failed to complete their standard in-person visit, we found that patients who missed hybrid visits were similar to those who missed standard in-person visits except for patients insured by Medicare. These patients were more likely to miss a hybrid visit than a standard in-person visit (Odds Ratio 2.199, 95% confidence interval 1.136-4.259, p = 0.019). No associations were found between patient nonadherence with hybrid telemedicine versus with standard in-person visits based on age, sex, primary language, race/ethnicity, marital status, or ADI.

CONCLUSION

The hybrid telemedicine model was associated with insurance and language-based disparities. Patients with non-English primary language and Medicaid recipients were more likely to miss a hybrid visit than their counterparts. Our findings support developing deliberate interventions to ensure hybrid telemedicine care is delivered equitably to all patients.

Association Between Sociodemographic Factors and Vision Difficulty in the National Health Interview Survey: A Population-Based Analysis

PURPOSE

To investigate the relationship between social determinants of health with self-reported vision difficulty.

DESIGN

Cross-sectional, population-based analysis.

METHODS

The National Health Interview Survey (NHIS) is an annual survey based on the U.S. population ≥18 years of age. It provides self-reported data on demographic characteristics, socioeconomic factors, health status, and health care access. The 2021 NHIS database was used in this study. Adult participants of the NHIS who responded to the vision difficulty question "Do you have difficulty seeing, even when wearing glasses or contact lenses?" were included in this analysis. The outcome of interest was self-reported vision difficulty by participants. Analysis was done through univariable and multivariable logistic regression.

RESULTS

Overall, there were 29,464 participants included in the analysis. Univariable logistic regression showed an increased odds of self-reported vision difficulty among female (odds ratio [OR] 1.28 [95% confidence interval {CI} 1.20-1.38]; P < .001), gay, lesbian, or bisexual participants (OR 1.24 [95% CI 1.04-1.49]; P = .02), those who possessed public compared with private insurance (OR 1.83 [95% CI 1.69-1.99]; P < .001), those with less than a high school education (OR 1.88 [95% CI 1.67-2.13]; P < .001), and those with an income below the poverty threshold (OR 2.22 [95% CI 1.96-2.51]; P < .001). Multivariable analysis revealed an increased risk of vision difficulty reported amongst non-Hispanic Black participants (OR 1.65 [95% CI 1.21-2.25]; P = .002).

CONCLUSIONS

A multitude of sociodemographic factors are associated with self-reported vision difficulty in the U.S.

POPULATION

Our findings emphasize the importance of considering factors of social determinants of health in clinical practice and policymaking for patients with vision loss.

Disparities in Eye Care Access and Utilization: A Narrative Review

This narrative review summarizes the literature on factors related to eye care access and utilization in the United States. Using the Healthy People 2030 framework, this review investigates social determinants of health associated with general and follow-up engagement, screenings, diagnostic visits, treatment, technology, and teleophthalmology. We provide hypotheses for these documented eye care disparities, featuring qualitative, patient-centered research. Lastly, we provide recommendations in the hopes of appropriately eliminating these disparities and reimagining eye care.

Telehealth Services: Improving Equity in Pulmonary Health Outcomes

Expansion of telehealth services has the potential to attenuate health inequities in pulmonary medicine, by improving access to care and health outcomes in patients with lung disease. These telehealth services include remote patient monitoring, synchronous telemedicine, and remote pulmonary rehabilitation. Currently, patients who are White, well-educated, wealthy, and from urban areas are the most likely to benefit from telehealth services. Without clear policy decisions and planning to overcome the "Digital Divide," telehealth services will only exacerbate existing disparities within the pulmonary disease. We describe the benefits and limitations of these new technologies and their impact on improving equity in pulmonary medicine.

Factors Associated with Follow-Up Adherence After Teleophthalmology for Diabetic Eye Screening Before and During the COVID-19 Pandemic

Abstract Background: Follow-up adherence with in-person care is critical for achieving improved clinical outcomes in telemedicine screening programs. We sought to quantify the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic upon follow-up adherence and factors associated with follow-up adherence after teleophthalmology for diabetic eye screening. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed medical records of adults screened in a clinical teleophthalmology program at urban and rural primary care clinics between May 2015 and December 2020. We defined follow-up adherence as medical record documentation of an in-person eye exam within 1 year among patients referred for further care. Regression models were used to identify factors associated with follow-up adherence. Results: Among 948 patients, 925 (97.6%) had health insurance and 170 (17.9%) were referred for follow-up. Follow-up adherence declined from 62.7% (n = 52) prepandemic to 46.0% (n = 40) during the pandemic (p = 0.04). There was a significant decline in follow-up adherence among patients from rural (p < 0.001), but not urban (p = 0.72) primary care clinics. Higher median household income (odds ratio [OR] 1.68, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.19-2.36) and obtaining care from an urban clinic (OR 5.29, 95% CI: 2.09-13.43) were associated with greater likelihood of follow-up during the pandemic. Discussion: Follow-up adherence remains limited after teleophthalmology screening even in a highly insured patient population, with a further decline observed during the COVID-19 pandemic. Our results suggest that rural patients and those with lower socioeconomic status experienced greater barriers to follow-up eye care during the COVID-19 pandemic. Conclusions: Addressing barriers to in-person follow-up care is needed to effectively improve clinical outcomes after teleophthalmology screening.

Facilitators and barriers to access hospital medical specialty telemedicine consultations during the COVID-19 pandemic: Systematic Review

BACKGROUND

COVID-19 pandemic accelerated the digital transition in healthcare, which required a rapid adaptation of stakeholders. Telemedicine has emerged as an ideal tool to ensure continuity of care by allowing remote access to specialized medical services. However, its rapid implementation has exacerbated disparities in healthcare access, especially for the most vulnerable populations.

OBJECTIVE

To characterize the determinants factors (facilitators and barriers) of access to hospital medical specialty telemedicine consultations during the COVID-19 pandemic; to identify the main opportunities and challenges (technological, ethical, legal and/or social) generated by the use of telemedicine in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic.

METHODS

A systematic review was conducted according to PRISMA guidelines. Four databases (Scopus, Web of Science, PubMed and Cochrane COVID-19 Study Register) were searched for empirical studies published between January 3rd, 2020, and December 31st, 2021, using established criteria. The protocol of this review was registered and published in PROSPERO (CRD42022302825). A methodological quality assessment was performed, and results were integrated into a thematic synthesis. The identification of main opportunities and challenges was done by interpreting and aggregating the thematic synthesis results.

RESULTS

Of the 106 studies identified, 9 met the inclusion criteria and the intended quality characteristics. All studies were originally from the United States of America (USA). The following facilitating factors of telemedicine use were identified: health insurance coverage; prevention of SARS-CoV-2 infection; access to Internet services; access to technological devices; better management of work-life balance; and savings in travel costs. We identified the following barriers to telemedicine use: lack of access to Internet services; lack of access to technological devices; racial and ethnic disparities; low digital literacy; low income; age; language barriers; health insurance coverage; concerns about data privacy and confidentiality; geographic disparities; and need for complementary diagnostic tests or for the delivery of test results.

CONCLUSIONS

The facilitating factors and barriers identified in this systematic review present different opportunities and challenges, including those of technological nature (access to technological devices and internet services, level of digital literacy), sociocultural and demographic nature (ethnic and racial disparities, geographical disparities, language barriers, age), socioeconomic nature (income level and health insurance coverage), and ethical and legal nature (data privacy and confidentiality). To expand telemedicine access to hospital-based specialty medical consultations and provide high-quality care to all, including the most vulnerable communities, the challenges identified must be thoroughly researched and addressed with informed and dedicated responses.

CLINICALTRIAL

Factors Associated with Telehealth Utilization among Older African Americans in South Los Angeles during the COVID-19 Pandemic

BACKGROUND

The COVID-19 pandemic transformed healthcare delivery with the expansive use of telemedicine. However, health disparities may result from lower adoption of telehealth among African Americans. This study examined how under-resourced, older African Americans with chronic illnesses use telehealth, including related sociodemographic and COVID-19 factors.

METHODS

Using a cross-sectional design, 150 middle-aged and older African Americans were recruited from faith-based centers from March 2021 to August 2022. Data collected included sociodemographics, comorbidities, technological device ownership, internet usage, and attitudes toward COVID-19 disease and vaccination. Descriptive statistics and multivariable regression models were conducted to identify factors associated with telehealth use.

RESULTS

Of the 150 participants, 32% had not used telehealth since the COVID-19 pandemic, with 75% reporting no home internet access and 38% having no cellular/internet network on their mobile device. Age, access to a cellular network on a mobile device, and wireless internet at home were significantly associated with the utilization of telehealth care. Higher anxiety and stress with an increased perceived threat of COVID-19 and positive attitudes toward COVID-19 vaccination were associated with telehealth utilization.

DISCUSSION

Access and integration of telehealth services were highlighted as challenges for this population of African Americans. To reduce disparities, expansion of subsidized wireless internet access in marginalized communities is necessitated. Education outreach and training by healthcare systems and community health workers to improve uptake of telehealth currently and post-COVID-19 should be considered.

Acceptability of Telerehabilitation for Magnification Devices for the Visually Impaired Using Various Approaches to Facilitate Accessibility

Purpose

We examined different methods to reduce the burden of accessing technology for videoconferencing during telerehabilitation for magnification devices for the visually impaired.

Methods

During telerehabilitation studies over the past 5 years, vision rehabilitation providers assessed and gave training to visually impaired participants with newly dispensed magnification devices at home who connected to Zoom videoconferencing via loaner tablets or smartphones with assistance from (phase 1; n = 10) investigators by phone, (phase 2; n = 11) local Lions Club volunteers in participants’ homes, or (phase 3; n = 24) remote access control software in a randomized controlled trial with 13 usual care controls who received in-office training. All participants completed the same post-telerehabilitation phone survey.

Results

A significantly greater proportion of phase 3 subjects indicated they strongly or mostly agreed that the technology did not interfere with the session (96%) compared to phase 1 (60%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.2–12.5; P = 0.03) or phase 2 (55%; 95% CI, 1.8–188; P = 0.01). The majority indicated telerehabilitation was as accurate as in person (68%), they were comfortable with telerehabilitation (91%) and interested in a future session (83%), and their magnifier use improved (79%), with no significant differences in these responses between phases (all P > 0.10), including comparisons of participants randomized to telerehabilitation or in-office training in phase 3 who reported similar overall satisfaction levels (P = 0.84).

Conclusions

Participants across all phases reported high levels of acceptance for telerehabilitation, with least interference from technology using remote access control in phase 3.

Translational Relevance

With accommodations for accessibility to videoconferencing technology, telerehabilitation for magnification devices can be a feasible, acceptable, and valuable option in countries with resources to support the technology.

Telehealth Encourages Patients with Diabetes in Racial and Ethnic Minority Groups to Return for in-Person Ophthalmic Care During the COVID-19 Pandemic

Purpose

The COVID-19 pandemic had a disproportionate impact on patients from racial and/or ethnic minority groups, causing many to delay healthcare. This study evaluates the role telehealth visits played in helping patients with diabetes mellitus (DM) return for subsequent, in-person eye examinations after the outbreak of COVID-19.

Methods

This retrospective, cross-sectional study analyzed 8147 patients with DM who had completed an outpatient ophthalmology and/or optometry visit in 2019 and who were due for return evaluation after the outbreak of COVID-19 in 2020. Factors associated with return for subsequent, in-person eye examination were assessed.

Results

The mean age of patients was 68.8 (±13.0) years, and 42% were women. 7.4% of patients identified as Asian; 2.9% as Black; 3.4% as Hispanic or Latin American; 0.92%, as more than one race; 1.78%, as other races; and 80.7% as White. Patients from racial and/or ethnic minority groups completed fewer in-person eye examinations after the outbreak of COVID-19 compared with White patients (35.6% versus 44.5%, χ 2=36.172, P<0.001). However, both groups accessed telehealth services at a similar rate during this period (21.1% versus 21.9%, χ 2=0.417, P=0.518). Importantly, patients who received telehealth services returned for subsequent, in-person eye examinations at substantially higher rates, regardless of race (51.0% and 46.6%, respectively, χ 2=1.840, P=0.175). This offset the otherwise lower rate of return experienced by patients from racial and/or ethnic minority groups compared with White patients among the group of patients who did not receive any telehealth services (32.7% versus 42.7%, χ 2=36.582, P<0.001). The impact of telehealth on the likelihood of in-person return remained significant after taking into account age, gender, race, language, residence, severity of diabetic retinopathy (DR), and vision in a multivariate model.

Conclusion

Telehealth initiatives benefited patients from racial and/or ethnic minority groups by reducing disparities in access to eye care experienced during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Changes in the quality of cancer care as assessed through performance indicators during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic in 2020: a scoping review

BACKGROUND

Cancer comprises a high burden on health systems. Performance indicators monitoring cancer outcomes are routinely used in OECD countries. However, the development of process and cancer-pathway based information is essential to guide health care delivery, allowing for better monitoring of changes in the quality of care provided. Assessing the changes in the quality of cancer care during the COVID-19 pandemic requires a structured approach considering the high volume of publications. This study aims to summarize performance indicators used in the literature to evaluate the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on cancer care (January-June 2020) in OECD countries and to assess changes in the quality of care as reported via selected indicators.

METHODS

Search conducted in MEDLINE and Embase databases. Performance indicators and their trends were collated according to the cancer care pathway.

RESULTS

This study included 135 articles, from which 1013 indicators were retrieved. Indicators assessing the diagnostic process showed a decreasing trend: from 33 indicators reporting on screening, 30 (91%) signalled a decrease during the pandemic (n = 30 indicators, 91%). A reduction was also observed in the number of diagnostic procedures (n = 64, 58%) and diagnoses (n = 130, 89%). The proportion of diagnoses in the emergency setting and waiting times showed increasing trends (n = 8, 89% and n = 14, 56%, respectively). A decreasing trend in the proportion of earliest stage cancers was reported by 63% of indicators (n = 9), and 70% (n = 43) of indicators showed an increasing trend in the proportion of advanced-stage cancers. Indicators reflecting the treatment process signalled a reduction in the number of procedures: 79%(n = 82) of indicators concerning surgeries, 72%(n = 41) of indicators assessing radiotherapy, and 93%(n = 40) of indicators related to systemic therapies. Modifications in cancer treatment were frequently reported: 64%(n = 195) of indicators revealed changes in treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

This study provides a summary of performance indicators used in the literature to assess the cancer care pathway from January 2020 to June 2020 in OECD countries, and the changes in the quality of care signalled by these indicators. The trends reported inform on potential bottlenecks of the cancer care pathway. Monitoring this information closely could contribute to identifying moments for intervention during crises.