Prevalence of the Infantile Strabismus Complex in Premature Children With and Without Periventricular Leukomalacia

Retinopathy of prematurity screening: prevalence and risk factors of ophthalmic complications in non-treated preterm infants

INTRODUCTION

Retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) is a vision-threatening disease of premature infants. Practice guidelines recommend that all infants screened for ROP receive follow-up eye examinations to screen for ophthalmic complications.1 The purpose of this study was to identify risk factors for the development of strabismus, amblyopia, high refractive error, and cataracts among ROP-screened, non-treated infants.

METHODS

Retrospective single-centre study of ROP-screened, non-treated premature infants with ophthalmic follow-up. Clinical variables were screened for association with ocular findings at follow-up. Multivariable logistic regression was used to determine the risk factors associated with ocular findings.

RESULTS

309 patients were seen for follow-up at 0.97 (0.69) [mean (SD)] years after neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) discharge. Strabismus was predicted by occipitofrontal circumference (OFC) z-score at NICU discharge (OR 0.61; 95% CI [0.42, 0.88]; p = 0.008), intraventricular haemorrhage (IVH) grade III or IV (OR 3.18; 95% CI [1.18, 8.54]; p = 0.02), and exclusive formula feeding at NICU discharge (OR 2.20; 95% CI [1.07, 4.53]; p = 0.03). Significant predictors of amblyopia were OFC z-score at discharge (OR 0.55; 95% CI [0.31, 0.96]; p = 0.03) and necrotising enterocolitis (NEC) (OR 6.94; 95% CI [1.38, 35.00]; p = 0.02). NEC was a significant risk factor for high refractive error (OR 7.27; 95% CI [1.39, 37.94]; p = 0.02).

CONCLUSIONS

Among premature infants screened but not treated for ROP, severe IVH, NEC, low OFC z-score, and exclusive formula feeding at NICU discharge were risk factors for ocular morbidity. These findings affirm the value of ophthalmic follow-up for all ROP-screened infants, particularly those with the identified risk factors.

Prevalence and Types of Strabismus in Cerebral Palsy: A Global and Historical Perspective Based on a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

PURPOSE

Strabismus is more frequent in cerebral palsy (CP) than in the normal population, but reports differ how much it is increased. We here examined the global prevalence and types of strabismus in CP, whether esotropia or exotropia is more frequent, and whether the prevalence differs between ethnicities and/or country income levels, and between generations.

METHODS

We compiled in a systematic review and meta-analysis the results of 147 CP studies that report the prevalence of strabismus or the ratio of esotropia to exotropia, and we conducted subgroup analyses for region (income level) and ethnicity. We performed a pooled analysis for the CP strabismus prevalence, and estimated the global number of CP cases with strabismus.

RESULTS

The pooled prevalence of strabismus in CP is 49.8% in high-income countries and 39.8% in lower-income countries. We estimate the global number of strabismus cases in CP as 12.2 million, with 7.6 million males and 4.6 million females, based on current estimates of 29.6 million global CP cases. Esotropia is more frequent than exotropia in Caucasians, while exotropia is more frequent than esotropia in Hispanic and in some Asian and African populations. The strabismus prevalence in CP increases with increasing country income levels.

CONCLUSION

Generational changes in strabismus prevalence appear to reflect a transition of CP types and an increase in prevalence as countries attain higher income and more effective maternal health care. The distribution of esotropia and exotropia in CP patients largely reflects the horizontal strabismus type that is predominant in the subject's ethnicity.

Prevalence and types of strabismus in cerebral palsy: A global and historical perspective based on a systematic review and meta-analysis

Purpose

Strabismus is more frequent in cerebral palsy (CP) than in the normal population, but reports differ how much it is increased. We here examined the global prevalence and types of strabismus in CP, whether esotropia or exotropia is more frequent, and whether the prevalence differs between ethnicities and/or country income levels, and between generations.

Methods

We compiled in a systematic review and meta-analysis the results of 147 CP studies that report the prevalence of strabismus or the ratio of esotropia to exotropia, and we conducted subgroup analyses for region (income level) and ethnicity. We performed a pooled analysis for the CP strabismus prevalence, and estimated the global number of CP cases with strabismus.

Results

The pooled prevalence of strabismus in CP is 49.8% in high-income countries and 39.8% in lower-income countries. We estimate the global number of strabismus cases in CP as 12.2 million, with 7.6 million males and 4.6 million females, based on current estimates of 29.6 million global CP cases. Esotropia is more frequent than exotropia in Caucasians, while exotropia is more frequent than esotropia in Hispanic and in some Asian and African populations. The strabismus prevalence in CP increases with increasing country income levels.

Conclusion

Generational changes in strabismus prevalence appear to reflect a transition of CP types and an increase in prevalence as countries attain higher income and more effective maternal health care. The distribution of esotropia and exotropia in CP patients largely reflects the horizontal strabismus type that is predominant in the subject's ethnicity.