Evaluation of Subretinal fluid Drainage Techniques during Pars Plana Vitrectomy for Primary Rhegmatogenous Retinal Detachment - ELLIPSOID study

SURGICAL DRAINAGE METHODS DURING PARS PLANA VITRECTOMY FOR RHEGMATOGENOUS RETINAL DETACHMENT: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

PURPOSE

To assess efficacy and safety outcomes of subretinal fluid drainage methods during pars plana vitrectomy for rhegmatogenous retinal detachment.

METHODS

A systematic search strategy was conducted for studies published between January 2000 and October 2022. Included studies reported on either the safety or efficacy of two or more drainage methods during pars plana vitrectomy for patients with rhegmatogenous retinal detachment.

RESULTS

Two randomized and five observational studies consisting of 1,524 eyes were included. Best-corrected visual acuity at the last study observation and primary reattachment rates were similar across groups. A significantly lower risk of epiretinal membrane formation was associated with draining subretinal fluid through preexisting retinal breaks (risk ratio = 0.70, 95% confidence interval = [0.60, 0.83], P = <0.01, I 2 = 0%) or with perfluorocarbon liquid (risk ratios = 0.70, 95% confidence interval = [0.59, 0.83], P = <0.01, I 2 = 0%) compared with posterior retinotomy. The risk of an abnormal foveal contour was significantly greater in perfluorocarbon liquid-treated eyes relative to posterior retinotomy (risk ratios = 1.56, 95% confidence interval = [1.13, 2.17], P = <0.01, I 2 = 0%).

CONCLUSION

No significant differences were observed in the final best-corrected visual acuity at the last study observation and primary reattachment rates across different drainage methods. There remains limited information on the topic, so future research is warranted.

Impact of drainage retinotomy on surgical outcomes of retinal detachment: insights from the Japan-Retinal Detachment Registry

We investigated the impact of drainage retinotomy on the outcome of pars plana vitrectomy for repair of rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (RRD). This study was a retrospective observational multicenter study. All patients were registered with the Japan-Retinal Detachment Registry. We analyzed 1887 eyes with RRD that had undergone vitrectomy and were observed for 6 months between February 2016 and March 2017. We compared the baseline characteristics and postoperative outcomes between eyes with and without drainage retinectomy. We then performed propensity score matching using preoperative findings as covariates to adjust for relevant confounders. Of 3446 eyes, 1887 met the inclusion criteria. Among them, 559 eyes underwent vitrectomy with drainage retinotomy, and 1328 eyes underwent vitrectomy without drainage retinotomy. After propensity score matching, each group comprised 544 eyes. There was no significant difference between the two groups in BCVA at 6 months after vitrectomy (0.181 vs. 0.166, P = 0.23), the primary anatomical success rate (6.3% vs. 4.4%, P = 0.22), or the rate of secondary surgery for ERM within 6 months (1.5% vs. 1.3%, P = 1.0). Drainage retinectomy does not increase the risk of decreased postoperative BCVA, surgical failure, or secondary surgery for ERM within six months outcomes.

Macular oedema secondary to rhegmatogenous retinal detachment repair: risk factors for resistance to first-line therapy and long-term response to dexamethasone intravitreal implant

OBJECTIVES

To assess the risk factors for resistance to first-line therapy and long-term response to dexamethasone intravitreal implant (Ozurdex®) of patients with macular oedema (MO) secondary to rhegmatogenous retinal detachment repair (RRDR).

METHODS

This was a retrospective, consecutive cohort study conducted in patients who underwent RRDR between January 2014 and December 2020 in the Rothschild Foundation Hospital and experienced postoperative MO (POMO) with a follow-up of at least 18 months.

RESULTS

Of the 1152 patients screened, 36 eyes (3.1%) experienced POMO. The mean follow-up duration was 45.2 months (18.0-80.5 months). Twenty-five eyes (69.4%) were resistant to first-line therapy and received at least one Ozurdex® injection (mean number: 2.7 [1-12]). The multivariate analysis showed an increased risk of resistance in patients who underwent perfluorocarbon liquid (PFCL)-assisted drainage (adjusted odds ratio: 8.65; 95% confidence interval: 1.97-15.33; p = 0.01). Significant differences in best-corrected visual acuity and central macular thickness were found between before Ozurdex® injection and the last follow-up visit: from 0.57 ± 0.47 LogMAR to 0.34 ± 0.32 LogMAR (p = 0.02) and from 483.0 ± 124.0 µm to 354.6 ± 96.5 µm (p = 0.001), respectively. The absence of serous retinal detachment and the presence of hyperreflective foci at baseline were associated with a higher resistance and a poorer response to Ozurdex®. Two patients (8%) experienced hypertony, that was well controlled with hypotonic drops.

CONCLUSION

MO secondary to RRDR is challenging. Ozurdex® could be reasonably proposed as first-line treatment, at least when MO occurs following PFCL-assisted drainage, given the favourable long-term benefit/risk ratio.

Two-year outcomes of different subretinal fluid drainage techniques during vitrectomy for fovea-off rhegmatogenous retinal detachments: ELLIPSOID-2 Study

BACKGROUND

The purpose of the study is to compare visual acuity, complications and outer retinal integrity following subretinal fluid (SRF) drainage from the peripheral retinal breaks (PRBs) versus posterior retinotomy (PR) versus perfluorocarbon liquid (PFCL) for macula-off rhegmatogenous retinal detachments (RRDs) at 2 years post-surgery.

METHODS

Retrospective analysis of 300 consecutive patients with primary RRD undergoing 23-gauge pars plana vitrectomy with SRF drainage through (1) PRB (n=100), (2) PR (n=100) or (3) with PFCL (n=100). Primary outcomes were visual acuity (best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA)) and complications (cystoid macular oedema (CMO) and epiretinal membrane (ERM)). Secondary outcomes were discontinuity of the external limiting membrane (ELM), ellipsoid zone (EZ) and interdigitation zone (IDZ) at 2 years post-surgery.

RESULTS

Mean (±SD) logMAR BCVA at 24 months was better in the PRB compared with PR and PFCL, with PFCL having the worst BCVA (PRB 0.5±0.6; PR 0.7±0.5; PFCL 0.9±0.7, p=0.001). CMO was higher with PFCL (PRB 29.7%; PR 30.2%; PFCL 45.9%, p=0.0015) and ERM formation was higher in PR (PRB 62.6%; PR 93.0%; PFCL 68.9%, p=0.002). There were no differences in ELM or EZ discontinuity. However, IDZ discontinuity was higher in PFCL (PRB 34%; PR 27%; PFCL 46%, p=0.002) at 2 years.

CONCLUSIONS

Visual acuity was worse and discontinuity of the IDZ and CMO was greater in eyes with PFCL-assisted drainage compared with PRB or PR. Drainage technique may impact long-term visual acuity and photoreceptor integrity.

Guidelines and treatment patterns for primary rhegmatogenous retinal detachments: Expert consensus and survey in Taiwan Retina Society

Rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (RRD) is a significant cause of vision loss and requires appropriate surgical intervention. There are several approaches available, including observation, laser demarcation, pneumatic retinopexy, scleral buckling, and pars plana vitrectomy, which are chosen based on patient condition, surgeon experience, and national health insurance policies. Despite the various options, there is still no consensus on the optimal intervention. To address this, the Taiwan Retina Society assembled an expert committee with 11 experienced retina specialists to review the current evidence and develop a guideline with seven recommendations for managing RRD patients. Additionally, a survey was conducted with six questions to assess treatment patterns in Taiwan, which included input from the expert committee and an open poll at the 2023 Congress of the Taiwan Retina Society. This report provides a comprehensive summary of the current knowledge and expert consensus on the treatment of RRD, discussing the characteristics of current approaches and providing an overview of current treatment patterns in Taiwan. These findings aim to provide ophthalmologists with the best possible treatment for RRD.

Recurrences and Macular Complications after Perfluorocarbon-Liquid-Free Vitrectomy for Primary Rhegmatogenous Retinal Detachment

INTRODUCTION

This study investigates factors associated with recurrent rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (RRD), macular complications, and visual outcomes after pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) without perfluorocarbon liquids (PFCLs) for primary RRD.

METHODS

A longitudinal cohort study included consecutive patients with RRD who underwent PFCL-free PPV. Postoperative visual acuity and spectral-domain optical coherence tomography findings [cystoid macular edema (CME), epiretinal membrane (ERM), ellipsoid zone/interdigitation zone (EZ/IZ) damage] were collected. Logistic regression and linear mixed models analyzed rates and risk factors for RRD recurrence, CME, ERM, EZ/IZ damage, and visual acuity at 12 months.

RESULTS

346 eyes with RRD were studied. Single-operation success rates were 96% and 93% for uncomplicated (n = 274 eyes) and complicated (n = 72 eyes) RRD, respectively. Factors associated with RRD recurrence were posterior retinal breaks [odds ratio (OR) = 10.7 compared to peripheral retinal breaks, p = 0.008], silicone oil tamponade (OR = 5.66 compared to gas, p = 0.01), and sectorial laser retinopexy (OR = 4.34 compared to 360° laser retinopexy, p = 0.007). The prevalence of CME, ERM, and EZ/IZ damage at 12 months was 10%, 9%, and 6%, respectively. Eyes with EZ/IZ defects had worse postoperative visual acuity in both uncomplicated and complicated RRD. Proliferative vitreoretinopathy (OR = 2.95, p = 0.03) and silicone oil tamponade (OR = 3.70 compared to gas, p = 0.05) were associated with EZ/IZ damage.

CONCLUSIONS

PFCL-free PPV demonstrated satisfactory single-operation success rates for uncomplicated and complicated RRD, with a low prevalence of macular complications. Analyzing factors associated with RRD recurrence can provide provisional recommendations for PFCL-free approaches in the absence of randomized trials.

Refining vitrectomy for proliferative diabetic retinopathy

Pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) is the main treatment modality for patients with severe diabetic retinopathy. With the development of systems for microincision, wide-angle viewing, digitally assisted visualization, and intraoperative optical coherence tomography, contemporary PPV for diabetic retinopathy has been performed on a wider range of indications than previously considered. In this article, we reviewed, in conjunction with our collective experiences with Asian patients, the applications of new technologies for PPV in eyes with diabetic retinopathy and highlighted several important procedures and entities not generally reiterated in the literature, in order for vitreoretinal surgeons to optimize their approaches when facing the challenges imposed by the complications in diabetic eyes.

In-Office Suprachoroidal Viscopexy for Rhegmatogenous Retinal Detachment Repair

Importance

In-office suprachoroidal viscopexy (SCVEXY) is a minimally invasive technique for rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (RRD) repair that can be performed with no incision, no tamponade agent, and no positioning requirements. This technique has the potential to be a step forward in the armamentarium to treat RRDs.

Objective

To describe in-office SCVEXY for RRD repair.

Design, Setting, and Participant

In this single-case report with short follow-up, a man in his 50s with pseudophakia and recent visual loss presented to St Michael's Hospital, Unity Health Toronto, with a fovea-off RRD in the right eye, extending from 6 to 10 o'clock, with no visible causative retinal break.

Exposure

Injection of suprachoroidal sodium hyaluronate, 1%, in the region of the suspected break, using a 30-gauge needle with a custom-made guard that exposed only 1 mm of the needle.

Main Outcome and Measures

Ability to perform in-office SCVEXY and to obtain a visible choroidal indentation.

Results

After the procedure, a dome-shaped choroidal convexity was present in the superior temporal area. The patient achieved macular reattachment in less than 24 hours with no postoperative abnormalities, such as outer retinal folds, residual subfoveal fluid, or retinal displacement, with rapid recovery of the outer retinal bands on optical coherence tomography. The optical coherence tomography scans acquired in the area of the choroidal convexity demonstrated the location of the viscoelastic material in the suprachoroidal space. Laser retinopexy was applied in the suspected region of the retinal tear, and the patient was able to resume normal activity immediately after the procedure with no restrictions.

Conclusions and Relevance

Suprachoroidal viscopexy is feasible as an in-office technique to create a temporary choroidal buckle for RRD repair. It is a minimally invasive procedure with the potential to maximize anatomical outcomes of integrity and postoperative functional outcomes in RRD because its mechanism of action does not require drainage of subretinal fluid or intraocular gas tamponade. Nevertheless, this was a single-case report with short follow-up, which limits the ability to determine the procedure's benefits, potential adverse events, failure rates, and best-case selection. Further work is required to refine the procedure and assess its efficacy and safety.

Effects of Perfluorocarbon Use during Rhegmatogenous Retinal Detachment Surgery on Postoperative Outcomes

INTRODUCTION

The aim of this study was to determine whether the use of perfluorocarbon liquid (PFCL) affects the rate of retinal re-attachments after an initial attachment by vitrectomy in eyes with rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (RRD).

METHODS

This was a retrospective, observational, multicenter study of 3,446 eyes registered in the Japanese vitreoretinal surgery treatment information database. Of these, 2,648 eyes had undergone vitrectomy as the first surgery for RRD. The re-attachment rates after the primary vitrectomy with or without PFCL were evaluated. In addition, the significance of factors affecting the re-detachments was determined by univariate and multivariate analyses. The measured outcomes were the rates of re-attachments after the primary vitrectomy with or without the use of PFCL.

RESULTS

A total of 2,362 eyes in the database were analyzed: 325 had and 2,037 did not have PFCL injected into the vitreous cavity during the vitrectomy. The rate of re-attachments was 91.5% in the PFCL group and 93.2% in the non-PFCL group (p = 0.46, χ2 test). Although there were several risk factors associated with the re-detachments in eyes without PFCL (p < 0.05, Welch's t tests, and Fisher's exact tests), they were not associated in eyes with PFCL use. However, multivariate analyses showed that there was no significant association between the use and the non-use of PFCL in the rate of re-detachments (β = -0.08, p = 0.46).

CONCLUSIONS

The use of PFCL during the initial vitrectomy for RRD does not affect the rate of re-attachments.