Treatment of Class II malocclusion with tooth movement through the maxillary sinus

Adjacent tooth migration after maxillary first molar loss in patients with sinus augmentation: A retrospective research

PURPOSE

The objectives of this study are to: (1) investigate the extent of antagonistic and distal neighboring tooth migration in the maxillary posterior single tooth-missing site during the healing period of bone augmentation and implant surgery; (2) identify factors associated with tooth migration.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

One hundred and forty-three cases that lost the maxillary first molar were included, and their CBCT data during the edentulous period were obtained. Dentition models were reconstructed from CBCT, and superimpositions were performed, followed by measuring migration distances and calculating migration rates of antagonistic and distal neighboring teeth. Factors were analyzed using multivariate generalized estimating equations (GEE).

RESULTS

The mean migration distances were 208 ± 137 μm and 403 ± 605 μm for antagonistic teeth and distal teeth, and the mean migration rates were 26.8 ± 21.2 μm/month and 48.5 ± 76.7 μm/month, respectively. One hundred and nineteen out of 143 distal neighboring teeth migrated toward the edentulous site, and all antagonistic teeth migrated occlusally. Occlusal contact loss and chronic apical periodontitis both significantly accelerated antagonistic tooth migration (p < 0.05), the latter also accelerated distal tooth migration (p < 0.05). Besides, the displacement of the distal teeth was somewhat accelerated by the impacted adjacent third molar and root protrusion into the sinus.

CONCLUSIONS

The neighboring teeth tend to migrate toward the edentulous gap in the maxillary posterior region. Occlusal contact loss and chronic apical periodontitis are two significant risk factors for accelerating antagonistic tooth migration, and for distal teeth, chronic apical periodontitis is the risk factor. The impacted adjacent third molar and root protrusion into the sinus are also potential risk factors for accelerating the migration of the maxillary distal tooth. Thus, to prevent maxillary edentulous gap reduction, the factors mentioned above should be taken into consideration when planning treatment flow.

Effect of the Maxillary Sinus on Tooth Movement during Orthodontics Based on Biomechanical Responses of Periodontal Ligaments

The maxillary sinus is a common anatomic limitation for orthodontic tooth movement. The effect of orthodontic forces on a particular anatomy can be studied using finite element analysis (FEA). Our study aimed to determine the effect of different tooth penetration depths into the maxillary sinus floor (MSF) on the orthodontic force system for bodily tooth movement. Using the cone-beam computed tomography of a patient with low MSF, we modeled the geometry of canine, premolar, and molar teeth with their periodontal ligaments and the alveolar bone surrounding them. The models were manually modified to simulate different root penetration depths. Thereafter, the center of resistance and stress distributions for teeth penetrating into the MS were determined using FEA. Moreover, the force systems for teeth with a low MSF to varying degree were evaluated based on the FEA results. During orthodontic tooth movement, the individual differences in the periodontal anatomy should be considered. The CR position decreases with the penetration depth, while the average hydrostatic stress in the PDL increases rapidly. In this paper, we present the correction coefficients of the orthodontic force and moment for a tooth penetrating into the MSF, which is necessary for personalized treatment planning.

Evaluation of the distance between the root apices of the upper first molars and the hard palate in an Eastern Mediterranean population: A retrospective study

OBJECTIVE

The aims of this retrospective study were, first to evaluate the distance between the root apices of the upper first molars and the palatal plane (PP), and second to determine the validity (accuracy) of the use of cephalometric radiographs or panoramic X-rays compared to cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) in determining this distance.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

The distance was calculated from the root apices of the first molars to PP, on the cephalometric radiographs of 204 subjects and then 57 measurements were compared to those obtained on panoramic X-rays and CBCT images, in order to find a statistically significant difference according to age, sex, side, vertical and sagittal skeletal patterns, and to determine if 2D radiographs are suitable for this task.

RESULTS

The distance increased significantly in subjects after 20 years of age and in hyperdivergent patients, but was not influenced by sex, side or anteroposterior position of the mandible. No statistical significance was found between the calculated measurements on cephalometric and CBCT radiographs, but both were different from those taken on panoramic X-rays.

CONCLUSIONS

Cephalometric radiographs are reliable in the assessment of the distance between the roots of the upper molars and the PP. In hyperdivergent and adult patients, posterior teeth have enough space between their roots and the upper limit of the hard palate to undergo intrusion mechanics using miniscrews, but care must be taken while planning and managing these movements in order to minimize the unwanted side effects.