IVF results: optimize not maximize

Hypertensive disorders of pregnancy and neonatal outcomes in twin vs. singleton pregnancies after assisted reproductive technology

OBJECTIVE

Hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (HDP) are associated with an increased risk of adverse neonatal outcomes. Although twin pregnancies had a higher risk of developing HDP, it is not known whether HDP in twins will increase the risk of adverse neonatal outcomes. We aimed to assess whether this association differed in singleton and twin pregnancies in women who conceived with assisted reproductive technology (ART).

METHODS

We finally included 193,590 live births born via ART from the National Vital Statistics System (NVSS) for the years 2015-2019. We used Log-binomial regression to evaluate the associations between HDP and the risk of adverse neonatal outcomes in ART mothers.

RESULTS

Among 193,590 ART-treated mothers, there were 140,870 and 52,720 mothers who had singleton pregnancies and twin pregnancies, respectively. Those ART mothers with twin pregnancies had a higher rate of HDP than singleton pregnancies (20.5% vs. 11.0%). In singleton pregnancies, the risks of preterm birth [adjusted risk ratio (aRR)): 2.80, 95% CI 2.67-2.93], low birth weight (aRR: 2.80, 95% CI 2.67-2.93), small for gestational age (aRR: 1.41, 95% CI 1.34-1.49), 5 min Apgar <7 (aRR: 1.66, 95% CI 1.50-1.83) and cesarean section (aRR: 1.23, 95% CI 1.21-1.25) were significantly higher in HDP mothers than in non-HDP mothers respectively. However, in contrast to singleton pregnancies, these associations were weak or reversed in twin pregnancies, after adjusting for confounding factors.

CONCLUSION

In ART-treated women, although twin pregnancies had a higher HDP rate, the risk of adverse neonatal outcomes associated with HDP was lower than that of singletons.

The periconceptional environment and cardiovascular disease: does in vitro embryo culture and transfer influence cardiovascular development and health?

Assisted Reproductive Technologies (ARTs) have revolutionised reproductive medicine; however, reports assessing the effects of ARTs have raised concerns about the immediate and long-term health outcomes of the children conceived through ARTs. ARTs include manipulations during the periconceptional period, which coincides with an environmentally sensitive period of gamete/embryo development and as such may alter cardiovascular development and health of the offspring in postnatal life. In order to identify the association between ARTs and cardiovascular health outcomes, it is important to understand the events that occur during the periconceptional period and how they are affected by procedures involved in ARTs. This review will highlight the emerging evidence implicating adverse cardiovascular outcomes before and after birth in offspring conceived through ARTs in both human and animal studies. In addition, it will identify the potential underlying causes and molecular mechanisms responsible for the congenital and adult cardiovascular dysfunctions in offspring whom were conceived through ARTs.

Maternal and perinatal outcomes in spontaneous versus assisted conception twin pregnancies

OBJECTIVE

To compare maternal and perinatal outcomes in twin pregnancies conceived via assisted reproductive techniques (ART) compared with spontaneous twin pregnancies.

STUDY DESIGN

This retrospective study examined 345 dichorionic, di-amniotic twin pregnancies (207 conceived spontaneously and 138 conceived via ART), delivered between January 2007 and June 2011 at the San Pietro Fatebenefratelli Hospital, Rome, a tertiary medical centre. Maternal and perinatal outcomes were compared. A multiple logistic regression analysis was performed to calculate risk estimates as odds ratios (OR) adjusted for maternal age, parity and systemic diseases. Patient data were obtained from a computerized database and analyzed using Statistical Package for the Social Sciences Version 17.

RESULTS

Gestational age and birth weight were lower in the ART group, and preterm delivery, gestational diabetes and placental abruption were higher in the ART group compared with the spontaneous conception group. The incidence rates of respiratory complications, patent ductus arteriosus and admission to the neonatal intensive care unit were higher among ART newborns. Length of hospital stay for mothers and newborns was longer in the ART group. No differences in mode of delivery, Apgar score at 5min, congenital anomalies, perinatal mortality, and other considered pregnancy and neonatal complications were found between the two groups. Multivariate analysis adjusted for maternal age, parity and systemic diseases revealed that only the rates of placental abruption [OR 7.45, 95% confidence interval (CI) 2.05-26.98] and patent ductus arteriosus (OR 3.39, 95% CI 1.01-11.46) were significantly higher for the ART group.

CONCLUSIONS

Twin pregnancies conceived via ART are at greater risk of poorer outcomes than spontaneous twin pregnancies. This may be related to the type of conception and specific negative features of subfertile patients undergoing infertility treatment.

Clinical effectiveness of elective single versus double embryo transfer: meta-analysis of individual patient data from randomised trials

OBJECTIVE

To compare the effectiveness of elective single embryo transfer versus double embryo transfer on the outcomes of live birth, multiple live birth, miscarriage, preterm birth, term singleton birth, and low birth weight after fresh embryo transfer, and on the outcomes of cumulative live birth and multiple live birth after fresh and frozen embryo transfers.

DESIGN

One stage meta-analysis of individual patient data.

DATA SOURCES

A systematic review of English and non-English articles from Medline, Embase, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (up to 2008). Additional studies were identified by contact with clinical experts and searches of bibliographies of all relevant primary articles. Search terms included embryo transfer, randomised controlled trial, controlled clinical trial, single embryo transfer, and double embryo transfer. Review methods Comparisons of the clinical effectiveness of cleavage stage (day 2 or 3) elective single versus double embryo transfer after fresh or frozen in vitro fertilisation (IVF) or intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) treatments were included. Trials were included if the intervention differed only in terms of the intended number of embryos to be transferred. Trials that involved only blastocyst (day five) transfers were excluded.

RESULTS

Individual patient data were received for every patient recruited to all eight eligible trials (n=1367). A total of 683 and 684 women randomised to the single and double embryo transfer arms, respectively, were included in the analysis. Baseline characteristics in the two groups were comparable. The overall live birth rate in a fresh IVF cycle was lower after single (181/683, 27%) than double embryo transfer (285/683, 42%) (adjusted odds ratio 0.50, 95% confidence interval 0.39 to 0.63), as was the multiple birth rate (3/181 (2%) v 84/285 (29%)) (0.04, 0.01 to 0.12). An additional frozen single embryo transfer, however, resulted in a cumulative live birth rate not significantly lower than the rate after one fresh double embryo transfer (132/350 (38%) v 149/353 (42%) (0.85, 0.62 to 1.15), with a minimal cumulative risk of multiple birth (1/132 (1%) v 47/149 (32%)). The odds of a term singleton birth (that is, over 37 weeks) after elective single embryo transfer was almost five times higher than the odds after double embryo transfer (4.93, 2.98 to 8.18).

CONCLUSIONS

Elective single embryo transfer results in a higher chance of delivering a term singleton live birth compared with double embryo transfer. Although this strategy yields a lower pregnancy rate than a double embryo transfer in a fresh IVF cycle, this difference is almost completely overcome by an additional frozen single embryo transfer cycle. The multiple pregnancy rate after elective single embryo transfer is comparable with that observed in spontaneous pregnancies.

Epidemiology of multiple pregnancy and the effect of assisted conception

Multiple pregnancy is one of the greatest perinatal challenges facing clinicians today. In a society of rising expectations among fertility and maternity service users, the potential for adverse outcomes associated with multiple pregnancy is a source of concern. This article examines the impact of assisted conception on the incidence of multiple pregnancies and associated complications. It explores some of the reasons for the strong association between assisted reproductive technology and multiple pregnancies and suggests possible ways of addressing this continuing problem.

ESHRE PGD consortium best practice guidelines for organization of a PGD centre for PGD/preimplantation genetic screening

In 2005, the European Society for Human Reproduction and Embryology (ESHRE) PGD Consortium published a set of Guidelines for Best Practice PGD to give information, support and guidance to potential, existing and fledgling PGD programmes. Subsequent years have seen the introduction of new technologies as well as the evolution of current techniques. Additionally, in light of recent advice from ESHRE on how practice guidelines should be written/formulated, the Consortium believed it was timely to update the PGD guidelines. Rather than one document that covers all of PGD, the new guidelines are separated into four documents, including one relating to organization of the PGD centre and three relating to the methods used: DNA amplification, fluorescence in situ hybridization and biopsy/embryology. Here, we have updated the sections on organization of the PGD centre. One area that has continued to expand is Transport PGD, in which patients are treated at one IVF centre, whereas their gametes/embryos are tested elsewhere, at an independent PGD centre. Transport PGD/preimplantation genetic screening (PGS) has a unique set of challenges with respect to the nature of the sample and the rapid turn-around time required. PGS is currently controversial. Opinions of laboratory specialists and clinicians interested in PGD and PGS have been taken into account here. Current evidence suggests that PGS at cleavage stages is ineffective, but whether PGS at the blastocyst stage or on polar bodies might show improved delivery rates is still unclear. Thus, in this revision, PGS has been included. This document should assist everyone interested in PGD/PGS in developing the best laboratory and clinical practice possible.

Is it safe to prescribe clomiphene citrate without ultrasound monitoring facilities?

The majority of triplet and higher order multiple pregnancies now result from ovulation induction/superovulation rather than in vitro fertilisation. However, clomiphene citrate is still widely prescribed by gynaecologists and general practitioners who do not have access to ultrasound monitoring. The objective of our study was to determine the prevalence of multifollicular development with different doses of clomiphene citrate. A retrospective review of transvaginal ultrasound monitoring of 425 cycles in 182 women receiving clomiphene citrate from January 2002 to December 2003, was studied. Three or more follicles of >or= 14 mm were identified in 58 cycles (14%). Patients received 50 mg of clomiphene citrate in 52 of these 58 cycles and 25 mg in the remaining six. One patient was noted to have developed five follicles and 10 patients developed four follicles. One patient developed six follicles, despite receiving only 25 mg clomiphene citrate daily. It was concluded that a significant number of women (14%) developed three or more follicles, despite receiving low doses of clomiphene citrate.

Attitudes towards single embryo transfer, twin and higher order pregnancies in patients undergoing infertility treatment: a review

The problems associated with twin and higher order pregnancies have assumed major importance, with international debate about multiple pregnancy; the single biggest risk with in vitro fertilisation (IVF). We have critically reviewed published papers on female patients' and their partners' views of single embryo transfer (SET) and twin or higher level pregnancies to identify the requirements needed to improve the acceptability of SET. Twenty relevant papers were identified and included in the review. Although the majority of IVF patients and their partners, in the more recent studies, exhibited a desire for twins rather than singletons, closer examination of the evidence revealed that elective SET (eSET) could become increasingly acceptable. As success rates of IVF have improved and the risks and consequences of multiple pregnancies are well-documented, patients have accepted the transfer of two rather than three embryos as standard practice. However, more would accept eSET if success rates approached those of double embryo transfer (DET). This emphasises the importance of improving success rates of eSET so that more patients can achieve a singleton birth with one IVF cycle. If patients were offered only SET, it is likely that this would be acceptable as the normal expectation of pregnancy is one baby. Measures to improve the acceptability of SET include: using eSET, especially with younger patients; including partners when providing risk information; improving eSET success rates; improving outcomes with cryopreserved embryos; changing reimbursement/free cycles to favour eSET; using legal enforcement.

THIRD STAGE PRACTICES AND THE NEONATE

The third stage of labour is defined as the period following the completed delivery of the newborn until the completed delivery of the placenta and its attached membranes. Whilst to the exhausted labouring woman this stage may be an afterthought, it is a crucial time for fetal-to-neonatal transition. Major changes in anatomy and physiology occur in both mother and baby. It has also been described as ‘potentially the most hazardous part of childbirth, largely due to the risk of postpartum haemorrhage (PPH) on placental separation. Despite this, the current management guidelines are based on an ‘eclectic combination of historical, anecdotal, philosophical and research-based factors.

IVF/ICSI with or without preimplantation genetic screening for aneuploidy in couples without genetic disorders: a systematic review and meta-analysis

PURPOSE

To assess the efficacy of preimplantation genetic screening to increase ongoing pregnancy rates in couples without known genetic disorders.

METHODS

Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Two reviewers independently determined study eligibility and extracted data.

RESULTS

Ten randomized trials (1,512 women) were included. The quality of evidence was moderate. Meta-analyses using a random-effects model suggest that PGS has a lower rate of ongoing pregnancies (risk ratio=0.73, 95% confidence interval 0.62-0.87) and a lower rate of live births (risk ratio=0.76, 95% confidence interval 0.64-0.91) than standard in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection.

CONCLUSIONS

In women with poor prognosis or in general in vitro fertilization program, in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection with preimplantation genetic screening for aneuploidy does not increase but instead was associated with lower rates of ongoing pregnancies and live births. The use of preimplantation genetic screening in daily practice does not appear to be justified.

Grundlagen der pränatalen Diagnostik

Pränatale Diagnostik kann heute mit unterschiedlichen Methoden, nichtinvasiv und invasiv, erfolgen. Gute humangenetische Grundkenntnisse sind erforderlich, um die Rat suchende Schwangere mit ihrem Partner umfassend zu informieren, damit von diesen auf der Grundlage des „informed consent“ alle notwendigen Entscheidungen getroffen werden können.

Chronic stretching of amniotic epithelial cells increases pre-B cell colony-enhancing factor (PBEF/visfatin) expression and protects them from apoptosis

In normal pregnancy, the fetal membranes become increasingly distended towards term and in multifetal gestations they become over-distended. Apoptosis of the amniotic epithelium increases with advancing gestation and may contribute to fetal membrane weakening and rupture. The effects of chronic static stretching for 36h have been investigated using primary amniotic epithelial cells. Pre-B cell colony-enhancing factor (PBEF) is a stretch-responsive cytokine and expression of its gene, intracellular and secreted protein were all significantly increased by 4h and its secretion sustained over 36h, contrasting with the rapid increase and decline in expression of IL-8. Increased expression of SIRT1 and decreased p53 paralleled the changes in PBEF, are known to be responsive to PBEF, and contribute to cell survival. Distension had no effects on proliferation or necrosis but protected the cells from apoptosis, knocking-down PBEF with antisense probes abrogated this protective effect. There was increased immunostaining of PBEF in the compact layer of the amnion in multifetal tissues and significantly fewer apoptotic amniotic epithelial cells. These results show that chronic stretching of the amniotic epithelial cells increases PBEF expression, which protects them from apoptosis.

Selective single blastocyst transfer reduces the multiple pregnancy rate and increases pregnancy rates: a pre- and postintervention study

Objective

To examine the clinical pregnancy rate (CPR) and multiple pregnancy rate (MPR) in a large in vitro fertilisation (IVF) programme before and after the introduction of single blastocyst transfer (SBT) strategy in a selected group of women.

Design

A 3-year pre- and postintervention study.

Setting

A tertiary reproductive medicine and assisted conception unit in a London teaching hospital.

Population

Two thousand four hundred and fifty-one fresh IVF cycles performed between July 2004 and June 2007 at the Assisted Conception Unit at Guy’s and St Thomas’ Hospital NHS Foundation Trust were included in the study.

Methods

In January 2006, we implemented a multidisciplinary intervention involving the introduction of a selective day 5 SBT service together with an educational programme on the risks of multiple pregnancy and potential advantages of blastocyst transfer aimed at couples at high risk of multiple pregnancy.

Main outcome measures

The CPR per cycle started and MPR per clinical pregnancy achieved.

Results

A statistically significant increase in the CPR from 27% (324/1198) to 32% (395/1253) (risk difference [RD] 5%, risk ratio [RR] 1.17, 95% CI 1.03–1.32, P = 0.015) and reduction in the MPR per clinical pregnancy from 32% (103/272) to 17% (69/395) (RD 15%, RR 0.46, 95% CI 0.35–0.60, P < 0.001) were observed after introduction of the SBT service.

Conclusion

Selective SBT in women with good prognosis can reduce the MPR after IVF while maintaining the overall success rate of the IVF programme.

Please cite this paper as:Khalaf Y, El-Toukhy T, Coomarasamy A, Kamal A, Bolton V, Braude P. Selective single blastocyst transfer reduces the multiple pregnancy rate and increases pregnancy rates: a pre- and postintervention study. BJOG 2008;115:385–390.

A 47-year-old woman with fertility problems who desires a multiple pregnancy

Mrs Z is a 47-year-old woman with long-standing infertility who is about to undergo in vitro fertilization (IVF) using donor oocytes from an anonymous donor. She has already undergone an IVF cycle with her own oocytes and an IVF cycle using donor oocytes from a known donor without a successful pregnancy. Mrs Z has been advised by her infertility physician to consider the transfer of a single embryo, but she does not wish to decrease her likelihood of conception, and, after her long and expensive infertility saga, wishes to conceive twins. The science of IVF has evolved significantly in the last several years, increasing the likelihood of successful pregnancy and reducing the need to transfer more than 1 embryo with its inherent risks of multiple pregnancy. The state of the science and why patients may continue to want multiple embryos transferred, including costs and lack of insurance coverage for infertility treatments, are discussed.

[Multiple pregnancies after ART: problems and possible solutions]

Multiple pregnancies following an assisted reproduction technique (ART) should be seen as a complication, and for that reason they should be avoided. In contrast to singleton pregnancies following ART, the multiple pregnancies are associated with a higher prenatal, neonatal and maternal risk; furthermore this results in a financial burden for the health care system. This paper gives an overview of the latest literature and different attempts of European countries, trying to reduce the multiple pregnancy rate. An efficient reduction is only possible by single-embryo transfers. There should be strict and cross-national regulation for the choice of women who should have a transfer of more than one embryo.

Résultats de l'Assistance médicale à la procréation en France: sommes-nous si mauvais?

OBJECTIVE

Comparative analysis of French results in Assisted Reproductive Techniques (ART) versus those from other European countries and the United States.

POPULATION AND METHODS

The study was achieved by using the officially available data. The analysis was faced with a lot of difficulties in relation with the various methods of collecting data in the different countries.

RESULTS

Nevertheless, it appears clearly that French results are among the lowest in Europe with a 22% rate for pregnancy per ovum pick-up with IVF and 23.4% with ICSI, when most of the other countries report rates that are close to or over 30%. Neither the patients' pick-up recruitment nor specific practices of ART can explain this difference that certainly comes from a deficient quality of the French IVF centres.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION

We think that four main end-points can explain this situation: the lack of financial support, the lack of human force, the lack of transparency and finally the opposition between clinician and biologist that has blocked the set-up of integrated ART centres, and probably a poor quality culture.

Endometriosis and assisted reproduction: the role for reproductive surgery?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The aim of this review paper is to discuss the relationship between endometriosis and assisted reproductive technology. More specifically, the following clinically relevant issues will be discussed. (1) Does the presence of endometriosis affect the outcome of assisted reproductive technology? (2) Does surgical treatment for endometriosis prior to or after assisted reproductive technology treatment affect the outcome of assisted reproductive technology? (3) Is assisted reproductive technology a risk factor for the recurrence of endometriosis after medical or surgical therapy?

RECENT FINDINGS

The review is based on recently published review papers/meta-analyses or international guidelines as published by the European Society of Human Reproduction or the American Society of Reproductive Medicine, updated with a selective review of recent papers searching PubMed with the key words 'Endometriosis', 'Assisted Reproduction', 'IVF', 'IUI' and 'Reproductive Surgery'.

SUMMARY

At the end of this review, a practical proposal for the clinical management of women with endometriosis-associated subfertility is proposed, based on our own experience.

Escaping the tyranny of the embryo? A new approach to ART regulation based on UK and Australian experiences

The early legislative responses to fertilization of human oocytes in vitro exaggerated the protection of the embryo at the expense of the interests of other parties. Although more recent legislative changes have lessened this embryonic grip, it nonetheless still distorts legal thinking and is fundamentally in conflict with biological understanding. Drawing largely on experiences in the UK and Australia, a proposal is explored that reframes the legislative approach to the regulation of assisted reproductive technology (ART) with the following objectives: (i) to align more closely the legal and biological understandings of the earliest stages of human development; (ii) to place the legislative focus on objective, intent and outcome; and in the process (iii) to disentangle legally and conceptually the status of the embryo from that of the potential child. Experiences in the UK and Australia are drawn on, because these two jurisdictions have a common legal heritage and were among the earliest players both scientifically and legally but have pursued very different legal routes to their current legislative practices.