1
|
Van Steijvoort E, Cassou M, De Schutter C, Dimitriadou E, Peeters H, Peeraer K, Matthijs G, Borry P. Exploring attitudes and experiences with reproductive genetic carrier screening among couples seeking medically assisted reproduction: a longitudinal survey study. J Assist Reprod Genet 2024; 41:451-464. [PMID: 38175314 PMCID: PMC10894802 DOI: 10.1007/s10815-023-03010-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/12/2023] [Accepted: 12/14/2023] [Indexed: 01/05/2024] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE This study aimed to assess the attitudes and experiences of subfertile couples applying for medically assisted reproduction (MAR) using their own gametes towards reproductive genetic carrier screening (RGCS) for monogenic conditions. METHODS A prospective survey study was conducted where subfertile couples were recruited from the fertility centre of a university hospital in Flanders, Belgium. Participants were offered RGCS free of charge and completed self-administered questionnaires at three different time points. RESULTS The study sample consisted of 26 couples. Most participants had no children, did not consider themselves as religious, and had some form of higher education. Overall, attitudes towards RGCS were mostly positive and the intention to participate in RGCS was high. Anxiety scores were only elevated and clinically relevant for a limited number of participants. A large proportion of participants would consider preventive reproductive options like prenatal diagnosis or in vitro fertilization (IVF)/intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) combined with pre-implantation genetic testing for monogenic conditions (PGT-M) in the event of an increased likelihood of conceiving a child with a hereditary condition. Participants were satisfied with their decision to undergo RGCS, and the majority would recommend RGCS to other couples. CONCLUSION Our study findings suggest that subfertile couples applying for MAR using their own gametes find RGCS acceptable and have a positive attitude towards it. This study provides valuable insights into the perspectives of these couples, highlighting the need for appropriate counseling and timely information provision.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eva Van Steijvoort
- Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Centre for Biomedical Ethics and Law, KU Leuven, Kapucijnenvoer 7 bus 7001 3000, Leuven, Belgium.
| | - Mathilde Cassou
- Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Centre for Biomedical Ethics and Law, KU Leuven, Kapucijnenvoer 7 bus 7001 3000, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Camille De Schutter
- Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Centre for Biomedical Ethics and Law, KU Leuven, Kapucijnenvoer 7 bus 7001 3000, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Eftychia Dimitriadou
- Department of Human Genetics, Centre for Human Genetics, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Hilde Peeters
- Department of Human Genetics, Centre for Human Genetics, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Karen Peeraer
- Department of Development and Regeneration, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Gert Matthijs
- Department of Human Genetics, Centre for Human Genetics, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Pascal Borry
- Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Centre for Biomedical Ethics and Law, KU Leuven, Kapucijnenvoer 7 bus 7001 3000, Leuven, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Mengels A, Van Muylder A, Peeraer K, Luyten J, Laenen A, Spiessens C, Debrock S. Cumulative pregnancy rates of two strategies: Day 3 fresh embryo transfer followed by Day 3 or Day 5/6 vitrification and embryo transfer: a randomized controlled trial. Hum Reprod 2024; 39:62-73. [PMID: 37886820 DOI: 10.1093/humrep/dead222] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/11/2023] [Revised: 09/27/2023] [Indexed: 10/28/2023] Open
Abstract
STUDY QUESTION Are cumulative pregnancy rates better if supernumerary embryos are vitrified on Day 5/6 instead of Day 3? SUMMARY ANSWER The results do not show a significant difference in cumulative pregnancy rates between the Day 3 and Day 5/6 vitrification groups. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY Pregnancy and live birth rates following IVF or ICSI treatment are higher after extended embryo culture and blastocyst transfer (Day 5/6) compared to cleavage-stage (Day 3) transfer. Cumulative pregnancy rates from one oocyte retrieval (OR) cycle show no significant difference after fresh and frozen embryo transfers, but only one study has used vitrification for the cryopreservation of supernumerary embryos while four studies have used a slow freezing protocol. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION Our prospective randomized controlled trial was performed in an academic centre between January 2018 and August 2020. Patients were randomized into vitrification Day 3 (n = 80) or Day 5/6 (n = 81) groups. The primary outcome was the cumulative ongoing pregnancy rate (cOPR), considering only the first pregnancy for each couple. The power calculation revealed that 75 patients were required in each group, when assuming a 50% cOPR with four embryo transfers in the vitrification Day 3 group vs two transfers in the vitrification Day 5/6 group. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS Patients <38 years undergoing their first or second OR cycles were randomized at the start of the first cycle. Up to two cycles were included in the analysis. A fresh embryo transfer was performed on Day 3. Supernumerary embryos (with ≥6 cells, <25% fragmentation, and equal blastomeres) or blastocysts (with expansion grade ≥2 with inner cell mass and trophectoderm score A/B) were vitrified on Day 3 or Day 5/6, respectively, and then transferred at a later date. A time-to-event analysis was performed with the patient's first ongoing pregnancy as the event of interest and the number of embryo transfers as the time component. The statistical comparison was performed by a Cox proportional hazards model. Cumulative costs of vitrification on Day 3 vs Day 5/6 were explored and compared using Mann-Whitney U tests. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE By December 2021, 233 transfers (96 fresh and 137 frozen) in 77 patients were performed in the vitrification Day 3 group and 201 transfers (88 fresh and 113 frozen) in 77 patients were performed in the vitrification Day 5/6 group. The time-to-event analysis did not show a difference between the two arms with regard to the patient's first ongoing pregnancy as the primary study outcome (hazard ratio [HR] 1.25, 95% CI 0.82; 1.92, P = 0.30). The cumulative ongoing pregnancy rate after eight transfers (from one or two ORs) was 57% in the vitrification Day 3 group vs 58% in the vitrification Day 5/6 group. The median number of embryo transfers until a pregnancy was achieved was five vs four, respectively, in the vitrification Day 3 group vs the Day 5/6 group. Similar results were found for the secondary study outcome, i.e. clinical pregnancy with foetal heart rate (HR 1.19, 95% CI 0.78; 1.80, P = 0.41). The cumulative clinical pregnancy rate (cCPR) after eight embryo transfers was 62% in the vitrification Day 3 group vs 59% in the vitrification Day 5/6 group. The median number of transfers until a pregnancy was achieved was four in both groups. The healthcare consumption pattern differed between the two groups and we observed higher costs for the vitrification Day 3 group compared to the vitrification Day 5/6 group, although these differences were not statistically significant. LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION Although our power calculation revealed that only 75 patients were needed in each study group (β = 0.87, α < 0.05), the numbers were low. Also, different numbers of single and double embryo transfers were performed between the two groups, which may have affected the results. The cost analysis was performed on a subset of the patients and is therefore exploratory. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS Our study shows no difference in the cumulative pregnancy rate nor costs after fresh and frozen embryo transfers of at most two sequential OR cycles between the Day 3 and Day 5/6 vitrification groups; however, obstetric and perinatal outcomes should be taken into account to determine the best strategy. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S) This study was funded as an investigator-sponsored study of S.D. by Merck nv/sa Belgium, an affiliate of Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany, and by Gedeon Richter Benelux (PA18-0162). The authors declare no conflict of interest related to this study. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER NCT04196036. TRIAL REGISTRATION DATE 15 January 2018. DATE OF FIRST PATIENT’S ENROLMENT 15 January 2018.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Mengels
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Leuven University Fertility Centre, University Hospital Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - A Van Muylder
- Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Leuven Institute for Healthcare Policy, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - K Peeraer
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Leuven University Fertility Centre, University Hospital Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - J Luyten
- Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Leuven Institute for Healthcare Policy, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - A Laenen
- Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Leuven Biostatistics and Statistical Bioinformatics Centre, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - C Spiessens
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Leuven University Fertility Centre, University Hospital Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - S Debrock
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Leuven University Fertility Centre, University Hospital Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Van Steijvoort E, Peeters H, Vandecruys H, Verguts J, Peeraer K, Matthijs G, Borry P. Experiences of nonpregnant couples after receiving reproductive genetic carrier screening results in Belgium. Eur J Hum Genet 2023; 31:696-702. [PMID: 36788144 PMCID: PMC9928592 DOI: 10.1038/s41431-023-01310-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/19/2022] [Revised: 01/27/2023] [Accepted: 01/31/2023] [Indexed: 02/16/2023] Open
Abstract
Reproductive genetic carrier screening (RGCS) allows for the identification of couples who have an increased likelihood of conceiving a child with a particular autosomal recessive or X-linked condition. The aim of this study was to assess the level of satisfaction, anxiety, knowledge retention, psychosocial and counseling-related aspects among couples who chose to have RGCS. Participants were initially informed about their screening results by telephone. After obtaining a written report of test results, participants were asked to complete an individual self-administered questionnaire. All participants (n = 67) felt they had enough information to make an informed choice. None of the participants regretted their choice to have RGCS. Test results were most often shared with parents (61%) or siblings (37%). Our findings demonstrate that the information/counseling and reporting strategy that was used in the context of this study led to high participant satisfaction, an increase in knowledge over time and favorable psychosocial and counseling-related outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eva Van Steijvoort
- Department of Public Health and Primary Care, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
| | - Hilde Peeters
- Department of Human Genetics, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Hilde Vandecruys
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Jessa Ziekenhuis Hasselt, Hasselt, Belgium
| | - Jasper Verguts
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Jessa Ziekenhuis Hasselt, Hasselt, Belgium
| | - Karen Peeraer
- Department of Development and Regeneration, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Gert Matthijs
- Department of Human Genetics, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Pascal Borry
- Department of Public Health and Primary Care, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Boogaerts M, Mengels A, Lie Fong S, Peeraer K, Tomasseti C, Vanhie A. Impact of Indication for Oocyte and Embryo Reception on Reproductive and Obstetric Outcomes. Gynecol Obstet Invest 2023; 88:267-277. [PMID: 37231826 DOI: 10.1159/000530885] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/07/2023] [Accepted: 04/18/2023] [Indexed: 05/27/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES This study aimed to assess if the indication for oocyte reception (OR) or embryo reception (ER) impacts the reproductive and obstetric outcomes by evaluating our experience at a tertiary fertility centre and by performing a literature review on this subject. Several previous studies have reported that, in contrast to other types of fertility treatment, the indication for OR/ER seems to have little impact on the outcomes. However, the compared indication groups vary considerably between these studies, and some data indicates worse outcomes in patients who developed premature ovarian insufficiency (POI) due to Turner syndrome or treatment with chemotherapy/radiotherapy. DESIGN A retrospective analysis of all cases of OR/ER at a tertiary fertility centre from 2001 until 2020 was conducted. We analysed 584 cycles from 194 individual patients. A literature review on the impact of indication on reproductive or obstetric outcomes of OR/ER was performed using the following databases: PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, and the Cochrane Library. A total of 27 studies were included and analysed. PARTICIPANTS, SETTING, METHODS For the retrospective analysis, patients were divided into three major indication groups: failure of autologous assisted reproductive technology, POI, and genetic disease carrier. To assess reproductive outcomes, we determined pregnancy rate, implantation rate, miscarriage rate, and live birth rate. For comparing obstetric outcomes, we reviewed the term of birth, mode of delivery, and birthweight. Outcomes were compared using Fisher's exact test, χ2 test, and one-way ANOVA utilizing the GraphPad tool. RESULTS There were no significant differences in reproductive and obstetric outcomes between the three major indication groups in our population, in line with the findings reported by existing literature. Data on impaired reproductive outcomes in patients with POI after chemotherapy/radiotherapy are conflicting. Obstetrically, these patients are at higher risk of preterm birth and possibly also low birthweight, especially after abdomino-pelvic or total body irradiation. For patients with POI due to Turner syndrome, most data suggest similar pregnancy rates but a higher rate of pregnancy loss, and obstetrically an increased risk of hypertensive disorders and caesarean section. LIMITATIONS The small number of patients in the retrospective analysis resulted in low statistical power when evaluating differences between smaller subgroups. There were some missing data on the occurrence of complications during pregnancy. Our analysis covers a period of 20 years, during which several technological innovations have also been made. CONCLUSIONS Our study shows that the important heterogeneity in couples treated with OR/ER does not significantly impact their reproductive or obstetric outcomes, except for POI due to Turner syndrome or treatment with chemotherapy/radiotherapy, where there seems to be an important uterine/endometrial component that cannot be entirely overcome by providing a healthy oocyte.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matthias Boogaerts
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Annemie Mengels
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Sharon Lie Fong
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Karen Peeraer
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Carla Tomasseti
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Arne Vanhie
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Hennes A, Devroe J, De Clercq K, Ciprietti M, Held K, Luyten K, Van Ranst N, Maenhoudt N, Peeraer K, Vankelecom H, Voets T, Vriens J. Protease secretions by the invading blastocyst induce calcium oscillations in endometrial epithelial cells via the protease-activated receptor 2. Reprod Biol Endocrinol 2023; 21:37. [PMID: 37060079 PMCID: PMC10105462 DOI: 10.1186/s12958-023-01085-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/02/2023] [Accepted: 03/23/2023] [Indexed: 04/16/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Early embryo implantation is a complex phenomenon characterized by the presence of an implantation-competent blastocyst and a receptive endometrium. Embryo development and endometrial receptivity must be synchronized and an adequate two-way dialogue between them is necessary for maternal recognition and implantation. Proteases have been described as blastocyst-secreted proteins involved in the hatching process and early implantation events. These enzymes stimulate intracellular calcium signaling pathways in endometrial epithelial cells (EEC). However, the exact molecular players underlying protease-induced calcium signaling, the subsequent downstream signaling pathways and the biological impact of its activation remain elusive. METHODS To identify gene expression of the receptors and ion channels of interest in human and mouse endometrial epithelial cells, RNA sequencing, RT-qPCR and in situ hybridization experiments were conducted. Calcium microfluorimetric experiments were performed to study their functional expression. RESULTS We showed that trypsin evoked intracellular calcium oscillations in EEC of mouse and human, and identified the protease-activated receptor 2 (PAR2) as the molecular entity initiating protease-induced calcium responses in EEC. In addition, this study unraveled the molecular players involved in the downstream signaling of PAR2 by showing that depletion and re-filling of intracellular calcium stores occurs via PLC, IP3R and the STIM1/Orai1 complex. Finally, in vitro experiments in the presence of a specific PAR2 agonist evoked an upregulation of the 'Window of implantation' markers in human endometrial epithelial cells. CONCLUSIONS These findings provide new insights into the blastocyst-derived protease signaling and allocate a key role for PAR2 as maternal sensor for signals released by the developing blastocyst.
Collapse
Grants
- C14/18/106 Research Council of the KU Leuven
- C14/18/106 Research Council of the KU Leuven
- C14/18/106 Research Council of the KU Leuven
- C14/18/106 Research Council of the KU Leuven
- G.0D1417N, G.084515N, G.0A6719N, 12R4622N, 12U7918N Fonds Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek
- G.0D1417N, G.084515N, G.0A6719N, 12R4622N, 12U7918N Fonds Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek
- G.0D1417N, G.084515N, G.0A6719N, 12R4622N, 12U7918N Fonds Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek
- G.0D1417N, G.084515N, G.0A6719N, 12R4622N, 12U7918N Fonds Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek
- G.0D1417N, G.084515N, G.0A6719N, 12R4622N, 12U7918N Fonds Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aurélie Hennes
- Laboratory of Endometrium, Endometriosis and Reproductive Medicine, Department of Development and Regeneration, KU Leuven, Herestraat 49 Box 611, 3000, Leuven, Belgium
- Laboratory of Ion Channel Research, Department of Cellular and Molecular Medicine, VIB Center for Brain & Disease Research, KU Leuven, Herestraat 49 Box 802, 3000, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Johanna Devroe
- Laboratory of Endometrium, Endometriosis and Reproductive Medicine, Department of Development and Regeneration, KU Leuven, Herestraat 49 Box 611, 3000, Leuven, Belgium
- Laboratory of Ion Channel Research, Department of Cellular and Molecular Medicine, VIB Center for Brain & Disease Research, KU Leuven, Herestraat 49 Box 802, 3000, Leuven, Belgium
- Leuven University Fertility Center, University Hospitals Leuven, Herestraat 49, 3000, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Katrien De Clercq
- Laboratory of Endometrium, Endometriosis and Reproductive Medicine, Department of Development and Regeneration, KU Leuven, Herestraat 49 Box 611, 3000, Leuven, Belgium
- Laboratory of Ion Channel Research, Department of Cellular and Molecular Medicine, VIB Center for Brain & Disease Research, KU Leuven, Herestraat 49 Box 802, 3000, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Martina Ciprietti
- Laboratory of Endometrium, Endometriosis and Reproductive Medicine, Department of Development and Regeneration, KU Leuven, Herestraat 49 Box 611, 3000, Leuven, Belgium
- Laboratory of Ion Channel Research, Department of Cellular and Molecular Medicine, VIB Center for Brain & Disease Research, KU Leuven, Herestraat 49 Box 802, 3000, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Katharina Held
- Laboratory of Endometrium, Endometriosis and Reproductive Medicine, Department of Development and Regeneration, KU Leuven, Herestraat 49 Box 611, 3000, Leuven, Belgium
- Laboratory of Ion Channel Research, Department of Cellular and Molecular Medicine, VIB Center for Brain & Disease Research, KU Leuven, Herestraat 49 Box 802, 3000, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Katrien Luyten
- Laboratory of Endometrium, Endometriosis and Reproductive Medicine, Department of Development and Regeneration, KU Leuven, Herestraat 49 Box 611, 3000, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Nele Van Ranst
- Laboratory of Ion Channel Research, Department of Cellular and Molecular Medicine, VIB Center for Brain & Disease Research, KU Leuven, Herestraat 49 Box 802, 3000, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Nina Maenhoudt
- Laboratory of Tissue Plasticity in Health and Disease, Cluster of Stem Cell and Developmental Biology, Department of Development and Regeneration, KU Leuven, Herestraat 49 Box 804, 3000, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Karen Peeraer
- Laboratory of Endometrium, Endometriosis and Reproductive Medicine, Department of Development and Regeneration, KU Leuven, Herestraat 49 Box 611, 3000, Leuven, Belgium
- Leuven University Fertility Center, University Hospitals Leuven, Herestraat 49, 3000, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Hugo Vankelecom
- Laboratory of Tissue Plasticity in Health and Disease, Cluster of Stem Cell and Developmental Biology, Department of Development and Regeneration, KU Leuven, Herestraat 49 Box 804, 3000, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Thomas Voets
- Laboratory of Ion Channel Research, Department of Cellular and Molecular Medicine, VIB Center for Brain & Disease Research, KU Leuven, Herestraat 49 Box 802, 3000, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Joris Vriens
- Laboratory of Endometrium, Endometriosis and Reproductive Medicine, Department of Development and Regeneration, KU Leuven, Herestraat 49 Box 611, 3000, Leuven, Belgium.
- Laboratory of Ion Channel Research, Department of Cellular and Molecular Medicine, VIB Center for Brain & Disease Research, KU Leuven, Herestraat 49 Box 802, 3000, Leuven, Belgium.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Tsuiko O, El Ayeb Y, Jatsenko T, Allemeersch J, Melotte C, Ding J, Debrock S, Peeraer K, Vanhie A, De Leener A, Pirard C, Kluyskens C, Denayer E, Legius E, Vermeesch JR, Brems H, Dimitriadou E. Preclinical workup using long-read amplicon sequencing provides families with de novo pathogenic variants access to universal preimplantation genetic testing. Hum Reprod 2023; 38:511-519. [PMID: 36625546 DOI: 10.1093/humrep/deac273] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/11/2022] [Revised: 11/16/2022] [Indexed: 01/11/2023] Open
Abstract
STUDY QUESTION Can long-read amplicon sequencing be beneficial for preclinical preimplantation genetic testing (PGT) workup in couples with a de novo pathogenic variant in one of the prospective parents? SUMMARY ANSWER Long-read amplicon sequencing represents a simple, rapid and cost-effective preclinical PGT workup strategy that provides couples with de novo pathogenic variants access to universal genome-wide haplotyping-based PGT programs. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY Universal PGT combines genome-wide haplotyping and copy number profiling to select embryos devoid of both familial pathogenic variants and aneuploidies. However, it cannot be directly applied in couples with a de novo pathogenic variant in one of the partners due to the absence of affected family members required for phasing the disease-associated haplotype. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION This is a prospective study, which includes 32 families that were enrolled in the universal PGT program at the University Hospital of Leuven between 2018 and 2022. We implemented long-read amplicon sequencing during the preclinical PGT workup to deduce the parental origin of the disease-associated allele in the affected partner, which can then be traced in embryos during clinical universal PGT cycles. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS To identify the parental origin of the disease-associated allele, genomic DNA from the carrier of the de novo pathogenic variant and his/her parent(s) was used for preclinical PGT workup. Primers flanking the de novo variant upstream and downstream were designed for each family. Following long-range PCR, amplicons that ranged 5-10 kb in size, were sequenced using Pacific Bioscience and/or Oxford Nanopore platforms. Next, targeted variant calling and haplotyping were performed to identify parental informative single-nucleotide variants (iSNVs) linked to the de novo mutation. Following the preclinical PGT workup, universal PGT via genome-wide haplotyping was performed for couples who proceeded with clinical PGT cycle. In parallel, 13 trophectoderm (TE) biopsies from three families that were analyzed by universal PGT, were also used for long-read amplicon sequencing to explore this approach for embryo direct mutation detection coupled with targeted long-read haplotyping. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE The parental origin of the mutant allele was identified in 24/32 affected individuals during the preclinical PGT workup stage, resulting in a 75% success rate. On average, 5.95 iSNVs (SD = 4.5) were detected per locus of interest, and the average distance of closest iSNV to the de novo variant was ∼1750 bp. In 75% of those cases (18/24), the de novo mutation occurred on the paternal allele. In the remaining eight families, the risk haplotype could not be established due to the absence of iSNVs linked to the mutation or inability to successfully target the region of interest. During the time of the study, 12/24 successfully analyzed couples entered the universal PGT program, and three disease-free children have been born. In parallel to universal PGT analysis, long-read amplicon sequencing of 13 TE biopsies was also performed, confirming the segregation of parental alleles in the embryo and the results of the universal PGT. LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION The main limitation of this approach is that it remains targeted with the need to design locus-specific primers. Because of the restricted size of target amplicons, the region of interest may also remain non-informative in the absence of iSNVs. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS Targeted haplotyping via long-read amplicon sequencing, particularly using Oxford Nanopore Technologies, provides a valuable alternative for couples with de novo pathogenic variants that allows access to universal PGT. Moreover, the same approach can be used for direct mutation analysis in embryos, as a second line confirmation of the preclinical PGT result or as a potential alternative PGT procedure in couples, where additional family members are not available. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S) This work was supported by KU Leuven funding (no. C1/018 to J.R.V.) and Fonds Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek (1241121N to O.T.). J.R.V. is co-inventor of a patent ZL910050-PCT/EP2011/060211-WO/2011/157846 'Methods for haplotyping single-cells' and ZL913096-PCT/EP2014/068315-WO/2015/028576 'Haplotyping and copy number typing using polymorphic variant allelic frequencies' licensed to Agilent Technologies. All other authors have no conflict of interest to declare. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER N/A.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Olga Tsuiko
- Laboratory for Cytogenetics and Genome Research, Department of Human Genetics, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.,Centre for Human Genetics, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Yasmine El Ayeb
- Laboratory for Cytogenetics and Genome Research, Department of Human Genetics, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Tatjana Jatsenko
- Laboratory for Cytogenetics and Genome Research, Department of Human Genetics, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Joke Allemeersch
- Centre for Human Genetics, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Cindy Melotte
- Centre for Human Genetics, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Jia Ding
- Centre for Human Genetics, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Sophie Debrock
- Leuven University Fertility Center, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Karen Peeraer
- Leuven University Fertility Center, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Arne Vanhie
- Leuven University Fertility Center, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Anne De Leener
- Centre for Human Genetics, Cliniques Universitaires Saint Luc, UCLouvain, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Céline Pirard
- Department of Gynaecology, Cliniques Universitaires Saint Luc, UCLouvain, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Candice Kluyskens
- Department of Gynaecology, Cliniques Universitaires Saint Luc, UCLouvain, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Ellen Denayer
- Centre for Human Genetics, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Eric Legius
- Centre for Human Genetics, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Joris Robert Vermeesch
- Laboratory for Cytogenetics and Genome Research, Department of Human Genetics, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.,Centre for Human Genetics, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Hilde Brems
- Centre for Human Genetics, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | | |
Collapse
|
7
|
Dias L, Willems SG, Luyten J, De Loecker P, D'Hooghe TM, Peeraer K, Dancet EAF. The need for longitudinal data on the value of fertility treatment for infertile patients' quality of life: A review and pilot study. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol 2023:102324. [PMID: 36948947 DOI: 10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2023.102324] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/31/2022] [Revised: 01/31/2023] [Accepted: 02/01/2023] [Indexed: 02/23/2023]
Abstract
Infertility threatens the life goal of parenthood and, hence, quality of life (QoL) of (wo)men, but the fertility clinic trajectory might be burdensome. This review of longitudinal studies and pilot longitudinal study examines the impact of the pre-in vitro fertilization (IVF) fertility clinic trajectory on patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) for emotional well-being, including QoL. A publication found that the diagnostic workup decreases men's infertility-specific distress while publications disagree whether it decreases (wo)men's anxious and depressive reactions. Intrauterine insemination (IUI) was found to increase (wo)men's depressive reactions. Publications on infertility-specific, health-related, and overall QoL were missing. The pilot indicated that (wo)men's overall QoL is not affected by the diagnostic workup but is decreased by the time of the third IUI. Longitudinal studies on the impact of starting the fertility clinic trajectory on PROMs are needed as they are essential for patient-centered clinical decision-making and patient-centered policy-level decision-making.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- L Dias
- Fertiliteitscentrum Antwerpen, GZA Ziekenhuizen, Oosterveldlaan 24, 2610 Wilrijk, Belgium; Department of Development and Regeneration, University of Leuven, Herestraat 49, 3000 Leuven, Belgium.
| | - S G Willems
- Department of Public Health and Primary Care, KU Leuven, Kapucijnenvoer 35 Blok D - Bus 7001, 3000 Leuven, Belgium.
| | - J Luyten
- Department of Public Health and Primary Care, KU Leuven, Kapucijnenvoer 35 Blok D - Bus 7001, 3000 Leuven, Belgium.
| | - P De Loecker
- Fertiliteitscentrum Antwerpen, GZA Ziekenhuizen, Oosterveldlaan 24, 2610 Wilrijk, Belgium.
| | - T M D'Hooghe
- Department of Development and Regeneration, University of Leuven, Herestraat 49, 3000 Leuven, Belgium; Merck, United States.
| | - K Peeraer
- Department of Development and Regeneration, University of Leuven, Herestraat 49, 3000 Leuven, Belgium; Leuven University Fertility Centre, University Hospitals Leuven, Herestraat 49, 3000 Leuven, Belgium.
| | - E A F Dancet
- Department of Public Health and Primary Care, KU Leuven, Kapucijnenvoer 35 Blok D - Bus 7001, 3000 Leuven, Belgium.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Geysenbergh B, Boes AS, Bafort C, Van Rompuy AS, Neyens S, Lie-Fong S, Debrock S, Vriens J, De Loecker P, Dancet E, D'Hooghe T, Peeraer K. The impact of chronic endometritis on infertility: prevalence, reproductive outcomes, and the role of hysteroscopy as a screening tool. Gynecol Obstet Invest 2023; 88:108-115. [PMID: 36739858 DOI: 10.1159/000529304] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/21/2022] [Accepted: 01/16/2023] [Indexed: 02/05/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To study the prevalence of chronic endometritis (CE) in infertile women, its impact on reproductive outcomes, and the accuracy of hysteroscopy as a screening tool for CE. DESIGN Prospective observational study. PARTICIPANTS 514 asymptomatic patients with infertility. SETTING Tertiary care center. METHODS The participants underwent a hysteroscopy and endometrial biopsy (EMB). Antibiotics were given for cases of CE. We investigated the prevalence of CE in patients starting assisted reproductive technologies (ART) as a primary outcome. Secondary outcomes were the clinical pregnancy rate (CPR) in the ART cycle after hysteroscopy, EMB, and antibiotic treatment in cases of CE; the cumulative CPR in the subsequent 2 years after hysteroscopy and EMB; the sensitivity and specificity of hysteroscopy as a screening tool compared to EMB as the "gold standard" for diagnosing CE. RESULTS CE was identified in 2.8% of patients starting ART (11/393). CPRs did not differ significantly between patients with CE and the entire cohort of patients without CE in the subsequent ART cycle (OR 0.43; 95% CI 0.09-2.02) or in the 2 years after EMB (OR 0.56; 95% CI 0.16-1.97). In a matched control comparison (with matching for age, basal FSH, and cause of infertility) CPR in patients with CE did not differ in the subsequent ART cycle (OR 0.39; 95% CI 0.09-1.61); however, their CPR in the 2 years after EMB was significantly lower (OR 0.22; 95% CI 0.13-0.38). The sensitivity and specificity of hysteroscopy as a screening tool for diagnosing CE were 8.3% and 90.1%, respectively. LIMITATIONS Due to our cohort's low CE prevalence, we could not detect significant differences in CPRs. CONCLUSION CE is rare in our studied population of asymptomatic patients starting ART. Hysteroscopy cannot replace EMB for diagnosing CE.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brecht Geysenbergh
- Department of Gynaecology, UZ Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
- Department of Gynaecology, GZA Hospitals, Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Anne-Sophie Boes
- Department of Gynaecology, UZ Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
- Department of Gynaecology, AZ Diest, Diest, Belgium
| | - Céline Bafort
- Department of Gynaecology, UZ Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | | | - Sara Neyens
- Department of Gynaecology, Jessa Hospital, Hasselt, Belgium
| | - Sharon Lie-Fong
- Department of Gynaecology, UZ Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
- Department of Development and Regeneration, KULeuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Sophie Debrock
- Department of Gynaecology, UZ Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
- Department of Development and Regeneration, KULeuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Joris Vriens
- Lab of Endometrium, Endometriosis and Reproductive Medicine, Department of Development and Regeneration, KULeuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Peter De Loecker
- Department of Gynaecology, UZ Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
- Department of Gynaecology, GZA Hospitals, Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Eline Dancet
- Department of Development and Regeneration, KULeuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Thomas D'Hooghe
- Department of Development and Regeneration, KULeuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Karen Peeraer
- Department of Gynaecology, UZ Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
- Department of Development and Regeneration, KULeuven, Leuven, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Van Steijvoort E, Peeters H, Vandecruys H, Verguts J, Peeraer K, Matthijs G, Borry P. Exploring informed choice in preconception reproductive genetic carrier screening by using a modified Multidimensional Measure of Informed Choice. Patient Educ Couns 2022; 105:3313-3318. [PMID: 35906131 DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2022.07.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/17/2022] [Revised: 06/08/2022] [Accepted: 07/21/2022] [Indexed: 06/15/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To explore informed choice in reproductive genetic carrier screening (RGCS). METHODS Women visiting a gynaecologist practice in Flanders (Belgium) were asked to consider participation in a study where RGCS was offered for free to them and their male partner. A modified Multidimensional Measure of Informed Choice was used to determine whether couples who opted for RGCS made an informed choice. In addition, we assessed risk perception, feelings towards RGCS, anxiety and decisional conflict. RESULTS Most participants (82 %, n = 63/77) made an informed choice with regard to RGCS according to our modified MMIC. Thirteen participants made an uninformed choice due to insufficient knowledge and one participant because of insufficient knowledge and value-inconsistency. Anxiety scores were elevated for three participants. Two participants presented with decisional conflict. CONCLUSION Our results show high rates of informed choice among non-pregnant couples who were offered RGCS in a research study and received up to 30 min of pre-test counseling. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS Limited resources outside a research context may impact informed choice. Pre-test counselling initiatives for RGCS should ideally be organized in such a way that information can be provided at multiple time points to avoid information overload and to allow for a reflection period.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eva Van Steijvoort
- Department of Public Health and Primary Care, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
| | - Hilde Peeters
- Department of Human Genetics, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Hilde Vandecruys
- Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Jessa Ziekenhuis, Hasselt, Belgium
| | - Jasper Verguts
- Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Jessa Ziekenhuis, Hasselt, Belgium
| | - Karen Peeraer
- Department of Development and Regeneration, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Gert Matthijs
- Department of Human Genetics, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Pascal Borry
- Department of Public Health and Primary Care, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Van Steijvoort E, Devolder H, Geysen I, Van Epperzeel S, Peeters H, Peeraer K, Matthijs G, Borry P. Knowledge, attitudes and preferences regarding reproductive genetic carrier screening among reproductive-aged men and women in Flanders (Belgium). Eur J Hum Genet 2022; 30:1255-1261. [PMID: 35304601 PMCID: PMC9626621 DOI: 10.1038/s41431-022-01082-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/15/2021] [Revised: 01/12/2022] [Accepted: 02/24/2022] [Indexed: 02/04/2023] Open
Abstract
Through carrier screening couples at-risk of conceiving a child with an autosomal recessive or X-linked condition can be identified prior to conception. The aim of this study was to assess knowledge, attitudes and preferences regarding reproductive genetic carrier screening (RGCS) among reproductive-aged men and women in Flanders (Belgium). Women and men of reproductive age visiting their pharmacist were invited to answer a self-administered questionnaire. Prior to filling in the questionnaire, participants were asked to read an information leaflet explaining some key concepts about RGCS. Our sample included 387 individuals of reproductive age, of which 68.5% were female and 31.5% were male. Most of the participants were below 34 years old (72.9%), didn't have children (68.6%) and were currently in a relationship (69.1%). Offering RGCS to couples that want to have children was found acceptable by 86% of participants. However, fewer participants would consider RGCS for themselves in the future (61%). We observed a positive correlation between attitude score/knowledge score and the intention to have RGCS. Half of the participants (50.9%) preferred the disclosure of individual test results. Most of participants indicated that RGCS should be offered through the gynecologist (81.1%), followed by the GP (71.5%) and the Centre for Human Genetics (64.8%). About 68.9% of participants were willing to pay out-of-pocket for an RGCS test. We recommend that RGCS should ideally be implemented through a tailored implementation strategy whereby individual needs and preferences can be taken into account.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eva Van Steijvoort
- Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Centre for Biomedical Ethics and Law, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
| | - Heleen Devolder
- Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Centre for Biomedical Ethics and Law, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Inne Geysen
- Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Centre for Biomedical Ethics and Law, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Silke Van Epperzeel
- Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Centre for Biomedical Ethics and Law, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Hilde Peeters
- Department of Human Genetics, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Karen Peeraer
- Department of Development and Regeneration, Woman and Child, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Gert Matthijs
- Department of Human Genetics, Laboratory for Molecular Diagnosis, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Pascal Borry
- Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Centre for Biomedical Ethics and Law, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
De Coster T, Masset H, Tšuiko O, Catteeuw M, Zhao Y, Dierckxsens N, Aparicio AL, Dimitriadou E, Debrock S, Peeraer K, de Ruijter-Villani M, Smits K, Van Soom A, Vermeesch JR. Parental genomes segregate into distinct blastomeres during multipolar zygotic divisions leading to mixoploid and chimeric blastocysts. Genome Biol 2022; 23:201. [PMID: 36184650 PMCID: PMC9528162 DOI: 10.1186/s13059-022-02763-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/01/2022] [Accepted: 08/31/2022] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Background During normal zygotic division, two haploid parental genomes replicate, unite and segregate into two biparental diploid blastomeres. Results Contrary to this fundamental biological tenet, we demonstrate here that parental genomes can segregate to distinct blastomeres during the zygotic division resulting in haploid or uniparental diploid and polyploid cells, a phenomenon coined heterogoneic division. By mapping the genomic landscape of 82 blastomeres from 25 bovine zygotes, we show that multipolar zygotic division is a tell-tale of whole-genome segregation errors. Based on the haplotypes and live-imaging of zygotic divisions, we demonstrate that various combinations of androgenetic, gynogenetic, diploid, and polyploid blastomeres arise via distinct parental genome segregation errors including the formation of additional paternal, private parental, or tripolar spindles, or by extrusion of paternal genomes. Hence, we provide evidence that private parental spindles, if failing to congress before anaphase, can lead to whole-genome segregation errors. In addition, anuclear blastomeres are common, indicating that cytokinesis can be uncoupled from karyokinesis. Dissociation of blastocyst-stage embryos further demonstrates that whole-genome segregation errors might lead to mixoploid or chimeric development in both human and cow. Yet, following multipolar zygotic division, fewer embryos reach the blastocyst stage and diploidization occurs frequently indicating that alternatively, blastomeres with genome-wide errors resulting from whole-genome segregation errors can be selected against or contribute to embryonic arrest. Conclusions Heterogoneic zygotic division provides an overarching paradigm for the development of mixoploid and chimeric individuals and moles and can be an important cause of embryonic and fetal arrest following natural conception or IVF. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13059-022-02763-2.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tine De Coster
- Laboratory for Cytogenetics and Genome Research, Department of Human Genetics, KU Leuven, 3000, Leuven, Belgium.,Reproductive Biology Unit, Department of Internal Medicine, Reproduction and Population Medicine, Ghent University, 9820, Merelbeke, Belgium
| | - Heleen Masset
- Laboratory for Cytogenetics and Genome Research, Department of Human Genetics, KU Leuven, 3000, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Olga Tšuiko
- Laboratory for Cytogenetics and Genome Research, Department of Human Genetics, KU Leuven, 3000, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Maaike Catteeuw
- Reproductive Biology Unit, Department of Internal Medicine, Reproduction and Population Medicine, Ghent University, 9820, Merelbeke, Belgium
| | - Yan Zhao
- Laboratory for Cytogenetics and Genome Research, Department of Human Genetics, KU Leuven, 3000, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Nicolas Dierckxsens
- Laboratory for Cytogenetics and Genome Research, Department of Human Genetics, KU Leuven, 3000, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Ainhoa Larreategui Aparicio
- Department of Clinical Sciences, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Utrecht University, 3584CM, Utrecht, The Netherlands.,Hubrecht Institute, 3584CT, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Eftychia Dimitriadou
- Laboratory for Cytogenetics and Genome Research, Department of Human Genetics, KU Leuven, 3000, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Sophie Debrock
- Leuven University Fertility Center, University Hospitals of Leuven, 3000, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Karen Peeraer
- Leuven University Fertility Center, University Hospitals of Leuven, 3000, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Marta de Ruijter-Villani
- Department of Clinical Sciences, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Utrecht University, 3584CM, Utrecht, The Netherlands.,Hubrecht Institute, 3584CT, Utrecht, The Netherlands.,Division of Woman and Baby, Department Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University Medical Centre Utrecht, 3508, GA, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Katrien Smits
- Reproductive Biology Unit, Department of Internal Medicine, Reproduction and Population Medicine, Ghent University, 9820, Merelbeke, Belgium
| | - Ann Van Soom
- Reproductive Biology Unit, Department of Internal Medicine, Reproduction and Population Medicine, Ghent University, 9820, Merelbeke, Belgium
| | - Joris Robert Vermeesch
- Laboratory for Cytogenetics and Genome Research, Department of Human Genetics, KU Leuven, 3000, Leuven, Belgium.
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Dreischor F, Laan ETM, Peeters F, Peeraer K, Lambalk CB, Goddijn M, Custers IM, Dancet EAF. The needs of subfertile couples continuing to attempt natural conception: in-depth interviews. Hum Reprod Open 2022; 2022:hoac037. [PMID: 36134038 PMCID: PMC9479888 DOI: 10.1093/hropen/hoac037] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/15/2021] [Revised: 07/28/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
STUDY QUESTION What are the experiences and the support and sexual advice needs of subfertile couples continuing to attempt natural conception after the diagnostic fertility work-up? SUMMARY ANSWER Exploration of the experiences of couples showed that couples would have appreciated fertility clinic staff embedding expectant management into the fertility clinic trajectory, supportive staff with female and male patient interactions and advice on common experiences of peers and on managing their lifestyle, distress and subfertility-related sexual challenges. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY Dutch and British professional guidelines advise newly diagnosed subfertile couples with a ‘good prognosis’ to continue to attempt natural conception and do not require fertility clinic staff to interact with patients. Fertility clinic staff and subfertile couples struggle to follow these guidelines as they feel an urgent need for action. Subfertile couples might benefit from sexual advice, as subfertility is negatively associated with sexual functioning, which is important for natural conception. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION Twelve one-time in-depth interviews (2015–2017) were conducted with 10 heterosexual couples and 2 women whose partners did not participate, then the interviews were subjected to inductive content analysis, reaching inductive thematic saturation. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS The 22 interviewees had experienced 3–18 months of expectant management after their diagnostic fertility work-up in a Belgian or a Dutch tertiary fertility clinic. The face-to-face in-depth interviews explored positive and negative experiences and unmet needs. The transcribed interviews were subjected to inductive content analysis, by two researchers discussing initial disagreements. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE Couples would appreciate fertility clinic staff embedding expectant management in the fertility clinic trajectory, by starting off with reassuring couples that their very thorough diagnostic fertility work-up demonstrated their good chance of natural conception, and by involving couples in deciding on the duration of expectant management and by planning the follow-up appointment after expectant management up front. Couples had encountered sexual challenges during expectant management and had an interest in sexual advice, focused on increasing pleasure and partner bonding and preventing the rise of dysfunctions. The couples agreed that a (secured) website with evidence-based, non-patronizing text and mixed media would be an appropriate format for a novel support programme. Couples were keen for interactions with fertility clinic staff which addressed both partners of subfertile couples. Couples also valued advice on managing their lifestyle and distress and would have liked information on the experiences of their peers. LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION Recall bias is plausible given the retrospective nature of this study. This explorative interview study was not designed for examining country or gender differences in experiences and needs but it did generate new findings on inter-country differences. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS Rather than simply advising expectant management, fertility clinics are encouraged to offer couples who continue to attempt natural conception after their diagnostic fertility work-up, supportive patient–staff interactions with advice on common experiences of peers and on managing their lifestyle, distress and sexual challenges related to subfertility. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S) Funded by Flanders Research Foundation and the University of Amsterdam. There are no competing interests. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER N/A.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- F Dreischor
- Amsterdam University Medical Center (UMC), University of Amsterdam Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Center for Reproductive Medicine, , Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam, 1105 AZ, The Netherlands
| | - E T M Laan
- Amsterdam University Medical Center (UMC) Department of Sexology and Psychosomatic Obstetrics and Gynaecology, , Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam, 1105 AZ, The Netherlands
| | - F Peeters
- University of Leuven (KU Leuven) Department of Development and Regeneration, , Herestraat 49, Leuven, 3000, Belgium
| | - K Peeraer
- University of Leuven (KU Leuven) Department of Development and Regeneration, , Herestraat 49, Leuven, 3000, Belgium
| | - C B Lambalk
- Amsterdam University Medical Center (UMC), Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam Department of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, Division of Reproductive Medicine, , de Boelelaan 1117, Amsterdam, 1081 HV, The Netherlands
| | - M Goddijn
- Amsterdam University Medical Center (UMC), University of Amsterdam Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Center for Reproductive Medicine, , Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam, 1105 AZ, The Netherlands
- Amsterdam University Medical Center (UMC), Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam Department of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, Division of Reproductive Medicine, , de Boelelaan 1117, Amsterdam, 1081 HV, The Netherlands
| | - I M Custers
- Amsterdam University Medical Center (UMC), University of Amsterdam Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Center for Reproductive Medicine, , Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam, 1105 AZ, The Netherlands
| | - E A F Dancet
- Amsterdam University Medical Center (UMC), University of Amsterdam Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Center for Reproductive Medicine, , Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam, 1105 AZ, The Netherlands
- University of Leuven (KU Leuven) Department of Public Health and Primary Care, , Kapucijnenvoer 35, Leuven, 3000, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Devroe J, Peeraer K, De Loecker P, Dias L, Vriens J, Dancet E. O-089 The impact of sharing personalized IVF-prognoses: a randomized controlled trial. Hum Reprod 2022. [DOI: 10.1093/humrep/deac104.103] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Abstract
Study question
Are women less likely to expect unrealistic live birth rates (i.e. 100% or > 2x their personalized IVF-prognosis) if gynaecologists share personalized IVF-prognoses during embryo transfer?
Summary answer
Sharing IVF-prognoses results in 1/3 rather than 1/2 women expecting unrealistic live birth rates (p = 0.03), but their partners do not take their IVF-prognosis into account.
What is known already
IVF-patients know that average IVF-success rates are only around 30%, but this does not hold them back from expecting an IVF success-rate of around 59% from their own IVF-cycle. These unrealistic expectations cause frustration among clinic staff and seem to contribute to patient’s decision to discontinue IVF. Performant prognostic models can now calculate personalized IVF-prognoses, based on clinical and laboratory factors, but the impact of these models on the expectations and wellbeing of IVF-patients had yet to be examined by an RCT.
Study design, size, duration
As dictated by a-priori power calculation, 160 heterosexual couples having their 2nd-5th oocyte aspiration (2019-2021) were recruited to study minimally 128 randomized couples (computer; 1:1 allocation; drop-out=20%) on the day of fresh embryo transfer. On that day the attention-control group received an embryo photo and feedback on the number of cryopreserved embryos. The intervention group additionally received their embryo quality rating and personalized IVF-prognosis (complete IVF-cycle live birth rate, Devroe et al., BMJOpen, 2020).
Participants/materials, setting, methods
A total of 160 of 197 (81.2%) invited couples agreed to participate and 144 were randomized (72 per group; n = 16 not randomized as no embryo for transfer on day 3 or 5). Immediately after the embryo transfer and attention-control or intervention condition, women and their partners (independently) rated their expected IVF live birth rate on a numerical rating scale (0-100%) and filled out the ‘STAI-State-Anxiety Inventory’. Analysis was according to intention to treat principles.
Main results and the role of chance
Randomisation succeeded in distributing the background variables equally between the attention-control group (ACG) and intervention group (IG). Couples had a mean duration of infertility of 26 months (±14.6), a median of one previous oocyte aspiration (range: 1-4) and a mean personalized IVF prognosis of 29.7 (±16.2; range 3.3–75.5). The primary hypothesis was accepted: women of the intervention group, having received their personalized IVF-prognosis, were less likely to expect an unrealistic IVF-live birth rate of 100% or of twice as high as their personalized IVF-prognosis (IG: n = 23/69 or 33.3% vs. ACG: 34/66 or 51.522%; p = 0.03). A trend in the same direction was observed in men (IG: 26/63 or 41.27% vs. ACG: 34/60 or 56.67%; p = 0.09). Focussing on the subgroup of couples with a below average prognosis (<30%; n = 76), in which the hypothesised effect seems most likely, confirmed the intervention effect in women (p = 0.016) and the lack thereof in men (p = 0.15). Receiving the intervention during embryo transfer affected state anxiety immediately after the embryo transfer in women (IG: 39.5±10.0 vs. 39.5±10.1; p = 0.54) nor men (IG: 37.6±9.1 vs. 37.1±7.7; p = 0.41). The vast majority of patients would advise the feedback to others, irrespective of having received their personalized prognosis (women: p = 0.9; men p = 0.4).
Limitations, reasons for caution
This RCT was powered for analysing the primary outcome in the entire sample, but not for the subgroup analysis. Whether the effect of sharing personalized IVF-prognoses on women's expectations translates into an effect on IVF-discontinuation, and hence cumulative success rates, is currently followed up.
Wider implications of the findings
Clinics are advised to offer patients their personalized IVF-prognosis as this limits the likelihood of unrealistic expectations in women, without triggering anxious reactions. The proportion of women and men with unrealistic expectations, however, remained high and men did not respond to our feedback.
Trial registration number
NCT04169295
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J Devroe
- Leuven University Hospital, Gynaecology, Leuven , Belgium
- Laboratory of Endometrium- Endometriosis & Reproductive Medicine, Department of Development and Regeneration KU Leuven, Leuven , Belgium
| | - K Peeraer
- Leuven University Hospital, Gynaecology, Leuven , Belgium
- Laboratory of Endometrium- Endometriosis & Reproductive Medicine, Department of Development and Regeneration KU Leuven, Leuven , Belgium
| | - P De Loecker
- GZA Ziekenhuizen, Reproductive medicine, Antwerpen , Belgium
| | - L Dias
- GZA Ziekenhuizen, Reproductive medicine, Antwerpen , Belgium
| | - J Vriens
- Laboratory of Endometrium- Endometriosis & Reproductive Medicine, Department of Development and Regeneration KU Leuven, Leuven , Belgium
| | - E Dancet
- Leuven University Hospital, Gynaecology, Leuven , Belgium
- Laboratory of Endometrium- Endometriosis & Reproductive Medicine, Department of Development and Regeneration KU Leuven, Leuven , Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Fernandez E, Sifrim A, Chappell J, Demeulemeester J, Van der Haegen M, Brown D, Theunis K, Van Herck J, Vandereyken K, Ponting C, Vermeesch J, Peeraer K, Debrock S, Pasque V, Voet T. O-236 A multi-omics genome-plus-transcriptome single-cell atlas of human pre-implantation development reveals the impact of chromosome instability on cell function within the embryo. Hum Reprod 2022. [DOI: 10.1093/humrep/deac106.018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Abstract
Study question
Which are the transcriptional signatures of chromosome instability (CIN) on the human pre-implantation embryo biology at single-cell level?
Summary answer
CIN-perturbed cells show gene expression dosage effects as well as signatures of developmental delay and cell competition within the developing human embryo.
What is known already
According to studies analysing whole human embryos at single-cell resolution, as much as 90% of the Day3-4 and up to 100% of the Day6-12 carry one or more cells with mitotic abnormalities. Intriguingly, embryonic CIN does not necessarily preclude normal offspring, since ∼30% of mosaic blastocysts detected by preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A) can result in healthy live births. A model of post-implantation human development revealed cell selection mechanisms that deplete aneuploid cells from the germ layers. However, single-cell multi-omics approaches have not yet been applied to resolve the transcriptional signatures of CIN in human embryos.
Study design, size, duration
Cryopreserved human embryos donated for research were dissociated into single cells between Day1-7 post-fertilization. Cells were processed by scG&T-seq generating 295 genomes and 576 transcriptomes. This data was integrated with published single-cell RNA-seq data, totalling 2105 single-cell transcriptomes from 172 embryos. Inference of cells' DNA copy number (CN) from gene expression was benchmarked using G&T-seq data and used for cells lacking DNA-seq data.
Participants/materials, setting, methods
Effects of aneuploidies on gene expression, regulatory programs, lineage specification and developmental progression rates were studied by integrative analysis on single-cell whole genome copy number and whole transcriptome data.
Main results and the role of chance
On the genomic level, we observed frequent acquired numerical and structural chromosomal aberrations. Deletions were more frequent than duplications and were equally spread across pre-implantation stages and cell lineages. Although 88% of the embryos contained aneuploid cells, 63% still contained euploid cells. On the transcriptome level, we disclosed 248 active transcription factors (TFs), including key regulators of cell identity, that constitute 10 major gene regulatory modules driving pre-implantation development. By integrating single-cell DNA-plus-RNA information, we unveil that changes in genes’ CN directly result in transcriptional changes in the same direction, and we disclose aberrant gene regulation. Moreover, we observed cell competition instigating well before ICM/TE cell lineages specification. Common transcriptomic signatures within CIN-perturbed cells were identified. Interestingly, in TE, cell competition signatures co-existed with up-regulation of pro-proliferative and implantation-related genes.
Limitations, reasons for caution
Our study is based on single-cell whole genome expression data from disaggregated IVF pre-implantation embryos.
Wider implications of the findings
Our analyses suggest that while unfit CIN-perturbed cells might be eliminated by cell competition mechanisms, these might be tolerated and potentially beneficial in TE. Thus, encouraging the transfer of mosaic embryos after PGT-A. Besides, we provide a unique comprehensive data resource for future work.
Trial registration number
not applicable
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- E Fernandez
- KU Leuven, Center of Human Genetics , Leuven, Belgium
| | - A Sifrim
- KU Leuven, Center of Human Genetics , Leuven, Belgium
| | - J Chappell
- KU Leuven, Stem Cell Institute , Leuven, Belgium
| | | | | | - D Brown
- KU Leuven, Center of Human Genetics , Leuven, Belgium
| | - K Theunis
- KU Leuven, Center of Human Genetics , Leuven, Belgium
| | - J Van Herck
- KU Leuven, Center of Human Genetics , Leuven, Belgium
| | - K Vandereyken
- KU Leuven, Center of Human Genetics , Leuven, Belgium
| | - C Ponting
- University of Oxford, MRC Functional Genomics Unit , Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - J Vermeesch
- KU Leuven, Center of Human Genetics , Leuven, Belgium
| | - K Peeraer
- UZ Leuven, Leuven University Fertility Centre , Leuven, Belgium
| | - S Debrock
- UZ Leuven, Leuven University Fertility Centre , Leuven, Belgium
| | - V Pasque
- KU Leuven, Stem Cell Institute , Leuven, Belgium
| | - T Voet
- KU Leuven, Center of Human Genetics , Leuven, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Mengels A, Peeraer K, Spiessens C, Debrock S. O-291 Cumulative pregnancy rates of two strategies: day 3 fresh embryo transfer followed by day 3 or day 5 frozen embryo transfer, a Randomized Controlled Trial. Hum Reprod 2022. [DOI: 10.1093/humrep/deac106.084] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Abstract
Study question
Are cumulative pregnancy rates different if supernumerary embryos are vitrified on day 5 instead of day 3?
Summary answer
Results do not show a significant difference in cumulative pregnancy rates between the vitrification day 3 and day 5 group.
What is known already
The pregnancy and live birth rates following IVF or ICSI treatment are higher after extended embryo culture and blastocyst transfer (day 5) compared to cleavage-stage (day 3) embryo transfer (Glujovski et al 2016). Cumulative pregnancy rates after fresh and frozen embryo transfers show no significant difference after one oocyte retrieval (OR) but only one study used vitrification for the cryopreservation of supernumerary embryos while four studies used a slow freezing protocol (Fernandez-Shaw et al., 2014). A retrospective analysis by De Vos et al., 2016 concluded significantly less embryo transfers were necessary until live birth for blastocyst-stage embryos.
Study design, size, duration
A Randomized Controlled Trial was performed in an academic center between 01/01/2018 and 31/07/2020. Patients were randomized in the vitrification day 3 or day 5 group. Primary outcome is the number of embryo transfers needed to reach ongoing pregnancy. Power calculation revealed that 75 patients were needed in each group, assuming a median of 4 transfers in the day 3 group versus a median of 2 transfers in the day 5 group to achieve pregnancy.
Participants/materials, setting, methods
Patients <38 years undergoing their first/second OR were randomized at the start of the cycle. Embryos with ≥6 cells, <25% fragmentation and equal blastomeres and blastocysts with expansion grade ≥2 with inner cell mass and trophectoderm score A/B were vitrified. A time-to-event analysis was performed with ongoing pregnancy as the event of interest and the number of embryo transfers as the time component. The statistical comparison was performed by a Cox proportional hazards model.
Main results and the role of chance
By December 2021, 234 transfers (96 fresh and 138 frozen) of 78 patients were performed in the vitrification day 3 group and 207 transfers (83 fresh and 113 frozen) of 80 patients in the vitrification day 5 group. The time-to-event analysis did not show a difference between both arms with regards to ongoing pregnancy as the primary study outcome (HR 1.25, 95% CI 0.81; 1.91, p = 0.31). The cumulative ongoing pregnancy rate after 8 transfers was 56% in the day 3 group versus 57% in the day 5 group. Median number of transfers till pregnancy was 6 versus 4, respectively. Similar results were found for the secondary study outcome (clinical pregnancy with fetal heart rate, HR 1.19, 95% CI 0.80; 1.80, p = 0.407). A total of 225 transfers (93 fresh and 132 frozen) of 78 patients were performed in the vitrification day 3 group and 201 transfers (92 fresh and 109 frozen) in the vitrification day 5 group. The cumulative clinical pregnancy rate after 8 transfers was 62% in the day 3 group versus 59% in the day 5 group. Median number of transfers till pregnancy was 6 versus 4, respectively.
Limitations, reasons for caution
Although power calculation revealed 75 patients are needed in each study group (β = 0.87, α < 0.05), numbers remain low.
Wider implications of the findings
A recent systematic review and cumulative meta-analysis of Marconi et al. (2021) suggests day 5 embryo transfer is associated with higher risk of preterm birth although evidence was low. Health/economic analyses should be taken into account to determine the most cost-effective strategy for patient and hospital/society.
Trial registration number
NCT04196036
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Mengels
- UZ Leuven, Reproductie en Groei , Leuven, Belgium
| | - K Peeraer
- UZ Leuven, Reproductie en Groei , Leuven, Belgium
| | - C Spiessens
- UZ Leuven, Reproductie en Groei , Leuven, Belgium
| | - S Debrock
- UZ Leuven, Reproductie en Groei , Leuven, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Dias L, De Loecker P, D'Hooghe T, Luyten J, Peeraer K, Dancet E. O-158 The evolution of the quality of life of women and men during the fertility clinic trajectory: a longitudinal survey. Hum Reprod 2022. [DOI: 10.1093/humrep/deac105.064] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Abstract
Study question
How does the overall quality of life (QoL) of infertile women and men evolve during the diagnostic workup and during intrauterine insemination (IUI)?
Summary answer
The diagnostic workup affects the overall QoL of neither women nor men but both partner’s QoL is diminished by the time of their third IUI.
What is known already
Overall quality of life (QoL) is increasingly acknowledged as the ultimate measure of health care quality. The WHO defines ‘overall QoL’ as an individual’s perception of their position in life in relation to their context, goals, expectations, standards and concerns. Infertility threatens the life goal of becoming parents. Value preference studies concluded that cost analyses should consider a decrement in women’s QoL for ‘being infertile with the desire for a child’. The short-term QoL costs or benefits of the fertility clinic trajectory, before potentially achieving the long-term benefit of a live birth, have yet to be examined.
Study design, size, duration
Two cohorts consulting a Belgian fertility clinic were studied longitudinally. Cohort 1 (C1) included 36 women and their partners (response rate 54%), who were surveyed before their first consultation (T1) and three months later, towards the end of their diagnostic workup (T2; 2017-2019). Cohort 2 (C2) included 23 women and their partners (response rate 64%), who were surveyed during their diagnostic workup (T1) and at the time of their third IUI (T2; 2020-2021).
Participants/materials, setting, methods
Dutch- or English-speaking heterosexual couples first consulting a fertility clinic were eligible. Overall QoL was assessed with the valid and reliable linear analogue scale (LAS; range: 1-100; the higher, the better QoL; Moons et al., Eur J Cardiovasc Prev Rehabil, 2006). Paired samples t-tests assessed the evolution in the overall QoL of women and of men. Linear models examined whether already being parents and male factor infertility affected change scores.
Main results and the role of chance
Women and men of both cohorts were on average in their early thirties and couples had tried to conceive naturally for, on average, 19 (C1) and 16 (C2) months. Most individuals (65.4% in C1; 87% in C2) did not yet parent a child. A considerate proportion of couples had been diagnosed with (amongst others) male factor infertility (34.6% in C1; 26.0% in C2).
The diagnostic workup did not affect the overall QoL of women (T1: 78.8±8.1 vs. T2: 75.8±9.7, p = 0.147) or men (T1: 80.8±7.9 vs. T2: 79.2±8.7, p = 0.206). The evolution in overall QoL throughout the diagnostic workup did not depend on parenthood status or male factor infertility (p > 0.05).
By the time of their third IUI, women’s overall QoL had diminished (T1: 80.9±9.9 vs. T2: 74.0±15.0, p = 0.018). This evolution was not affected by parenthood status or male factor infertility (p > 0.05). Similarly, men’s overall QoL had diminished by the time of their third IUI (T1: 82.0±7.2 vs. T2: 78.1±9.6, p = 0.042). This reduction in men’s QoL was not affected by parenthood status (p = 0.759) but was especially observed (p = 0.028) among men without male factor infertility (T1: 82.9±7.9 vs. T2: 77.0±11.0, p = 0.008).
Limitations, reasons for caution
The rather small sample sizes were sufficient for examining the effect on QoL of time and two potential determinants (parenthood status, male factor infertility) according to the rule of thumb of including minimally five individuals per variable. Recruitment is still ongoing to increase the power of these cohort studies.
Wider implications of the findings
Fertility nurses/midwives should inform couples pursuing their life goal of parenthood that the fertility clinic trajectory will require short-term sacrifices. The diagnostic workup affects the overall QoL of neither women nor men, but both partner’s overall QoL is slightly diminished by the time of their third unsuccessful intrauterine insemination.
Trial registration number
not applicable
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- L Dias
- KU Leuven, Regeneration and Development , Leuven, Belgium
| | - P De Loecker
- GZA Ziekenhuizen, Vrouw & Kind , Wilrijk, Belgium
| | - T.M D'Hooghe
- KU Leuven, Regeneration and Development , Leuven, Belgium
| | - J Luyten
- KU Leuven, Department of Public Health and Primary Care , Leuven, Belgium
| | - K Peeraer
- UZ Leuven, Vrouw & Kind , Leuven, Belgium
| | - E Dancet
- KU Leuven, Regeneration and Development , Leuven, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Van Steijvoort E, Demuynck R, Peeters H, Vandecruys H, Verguts J, Peeraer K, Matthijs G, Borry P. Reasons affecting the uptake of reproductive genetic carrier screening among nonpregnant reproductive-aged women in Flanders (Belgium). J Genet Couns 2022; 31:1043-1053. [PMID: 35385167 DOI: 10.1002/jgc4.1575] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/06/2021] [Revised: 02/26/2022] [Accepted: 03/05/2022] [Indexed: 11/07/2022]
Abstract
Reproductive genetic carrier screening (RGCS) allows to identify couples who have an increased likelihood of conceiving a child affected with an autosomal recessive or X-linked monogenic condition. Multiple studies have reported on a wide and fragmented set of reasons to accept or decline RGCS. Only a few studies have been performed to assess the uptake of RGCS. Nonpregnant women visiting their gynecologist were invited to complete a questionnaire assessing perceived susceptibility, the acceptability of offering RGCS, attitudes, the intention to participate in RGCS, reasons to accept or decline RGCS, and sociodemographic characteristics. Women who showed the intention to have RGCS were asked to consider a free RGCS offer. Most women (n = 127) were between 25 and 34 years old (60%), in a relationship (91%), and wanted to have children (65%). Study participants had positive attitudes towards RGCS and the intention to consider RGCS in the future. Reasons to accept RGCS were being able to share genetic information with children or relatives (n = 104/127, 82%), to prevent the birth of a child affected with a hereditary condition (n = 103/127, 81%), and/or to know the chance of conceiving a child with a hereditary condition (n = 102/127, 80%). Reasons for declining RGCS were the possible concerns that could arise when receiving test results (n = 27/127, 21%), having no family history of hereditary disorders (n = 19/127, 15%), and not wanting to take action based on test results (n = 13/127, 10%). Among test intenders that met the inclusion criteria, 53% decided to participate in RGCS together with their male reproductive partner. More in-depth research on the decision-making process behind the choice to accept or decline an RGCS offer would be highly valuable to make sure couples are making informed reproductive choices.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eva Van Steijvoort
- Department of Public Health and Primary Care, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Remke Demuynck
- Department of Public Health and Primary Care, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Hilde Peeters
- Department of Human Genetics, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Hilde Vandecruys
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Jessa Ziekenhuis Hasselt, Hasselt, Belgium
| | - Jasper Verguts
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Jessa Ziekenhuis Hasselt, Hasselt, Belgium
| | - Karen Peeraer
- Department of Development and Regeneration, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Gert Matthijs
- Department of Human Genetics, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Pascal Borry
- Department of Public Health and Primary Care, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Masset H, Ding J, Dimitriadou E, Debrock S, Tšuiko O, Smits K, Peeraer K, Voet T, Zamani Esteki M, Vermeesch JR. Single-cell genome-wide concurrent haplotyping and copy-number profiling through genotyping-by-sequencing. Nucleic Acids Res 2022; 50:e63. [PMID: 35212381 PMCID: PMC9226495 DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkac134] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/20/2021] [Revised: 01/10/2022] [Accepted: 02/11/2022] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Single-cell whole-genome haplotyping allows simultaneous detection of haplotypes associated with monogenic diseases, chromosome copy-numbering and subsequently, has revealed mosaicism in embryos and embryonic stem cells. Methods, such as karyomapping and haplarithmisis, were deployed as a generic and genome-wide approach for preimplantation genetic testing (PGT) and are replacing traditional PGT methods. While current methods primarily rely on single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) array, we envision sequencing-based methods to become more accessible and cost-efficient. Here, we developed a novel sequencing-based methodology to haplotype and copy-number profile single cells. Following DNA amplification, genomic size and complexity is reduced through restriction enzyme digestion and DNA is genotyped through sequencing. This single-cell genotyping-by-sequencing (scGBS) is the input for haplarithmisis, an algorithm we previously developed for SNP array-based single-cell haplotyping. We established technical parameters and developed an analysis pipeline enabling accurate concurrent haplotyping and copy-number profiling of single cells. We demonstrate its value in human blastomere and trophectoderm samples as application for PGT for monogenic disorders. Furthermore, we demonstrate the method to work in other species through analyzing blastomeres of bovine embryos. Our scGBS method opens up the path for single-cell haplotyping of any species with diploid genomes and could make its way into the clinic as a PGT application.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Heleen Masset
- Laboratory for Cytogenetics and Genome Research, Department of Human Genetics, KU Leuven, Leuven, 3000, Belgium
| | - Jia Ding
- Center of Human Genetics, University Hospitals of Leuven, Leuven, 3000, Belgium
| | | | - Sophie Debrock
- Leuven University Fertility Center, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, 3000, Belgium
| | - Olga Tšuiko
- Laboratory for Cytogenetics and Genome Research, Department of Human Genetics, KU Leuven, Leuven, 3000, Belgium.,Center of Human Genetics, University Hospitals of Leuven, Leuven, 3000, Belgium
| | - Katrien Smits
- Department of Internal Medicine, Reproduction and Population Medicine, Ghent University, Merelbeke, 9820, Belgium
| | - Karen Peeraer
- Leuven University Fertility Center, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, 3000, Belgium
| | - Thierry Voet
- Laboratory of Reproductive Genomics, Department of Human Genetics, KU Leuven, Leuven, 3000, Belgium
| | - Masoud Zamani Esteki
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, 6202 AZ, The Netherlands.,Department of Genetics and Cell Biology, GROW School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University, Maastricht, 6229 ER, The Netherlands
| | - Joris R Vermeesch
- Laboratory for Cytogenetics and Genome Research, Department of Human Genetics, KU Leuven, Leuven, 3000, Belgium.,Center of Human Genetics, University Hospitals of Leuven, Leuven, 3000, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Wessel JA, Danhof NA, van Eekelen R, Diamond MP, Legro RS, Peeraer K, D’Hooghe TM, Erdem M, Dankert T, Cohlen BJ, Thyagaraju C, Mol BWJ, Showell M, van Wely M, Mochtar MH, Wang R. OUP accepted manuscript. Hum Reprod Update 2022; 28:733-746. [PMID: 35587030 PMCID: PMC9434229 DOI: 10.1093/humupd/dmac021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/19/2021] [Revised: 03/23/2022] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Intrauterine insemination with ovarian stimulation (IUI-OS) is a first-line treatment for unexplained infertility. Gonadotrophins, letrozole and clomiphene citrate (CC) are commonly used agents during IUI-OS and have been compared in multiple aggregate data meta-analyses, with substantial heterogeneity and no analysis on time-to-event outcomes. Individual participant data meta-analysis (IPD-MA) is considered the gold standard for evidence synthesis as it can offset inadequate reporting of individual studies by obtaining the IPD, and allows analyses on treatment–covariate interactions to identify couples who benefit most from a particular treatment. OBJECTIVE AND RATIONALE We performed this IPD-MA to compare the effectiveness and safety of ovarian stimulation with gonadotrophins, letrozole and CC and to explore treatment–covariate interactions for important baseline characteristics in couples undergoing IUI. SEARCH METHODS We searched electronic databases including MEDLINE, EMBASE, CENTRAL, CINAHL, and PsycINFO from their inception to 28 June 2021. We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing IUI-OS with gonadotrophins, letrozole and CC among couples with unexplained infertility. We contacted the authors of eligible RCTs to share the IPD and established the IUI IPD-MA Collaboration. The primary effectiveness outcome was live birth and the primary safety outcome was multiple pregnancy. Secondary outcomes were other reproductive outcomes, including time to conception leading to live birth. We performed a one-stage random effects IPD-MA. OUTCOMES Seven of 22 (31.8%) eligible RCTs provided IPD of 2495 couples (62.4% of the 3997 couples participating in 22 RCTs), of which 2411 had unexplained infertility and were included in this IPD-MA. Six RCTs (n = 1511) compared gonadotrophins with CC, and one (n = 900) compared gonadotrophins, letrozole and CC. Moderate-certainty evidence showed that gonadotrophins increased the live birth rate compared to CC (6 RCTs, 2058 women, RR 1.30, 95% CI 1.12–1.51, I2 = 26%). Low-certainty evidence showed that gonadotrophins may also increase the multiple pregnancy rate compared to CC (6 RCTs, 2058 women, RR 2.17, 95% CI 1.33–3.54, I2 = 69%). Heterogeneity on multiple pregnancy could be explained by differences in gonadotrophin starting dose and choice of cancellation criteria. Post-hoc sensitivity analysis on RCTs with a low starting dose of gonadotrophins (≤75 IU) confirmed increased live birth rates compared to CC (5 RCTs, 1457 women, RR 1.26, 95% CI 1.05–1.51), but analysis on only RCTs with stricter cancellation criteria showed inconclusive evidence on live birth (4 RCTs, 1238 women, RR 1.15, 95% CI 0.94–1.41). For multiple pregnancy, both sensitivity analyses showed inconclusive findings between gonadotrophins and CC (RR 0.94, 95% CI 0.45–1.96; RR 0.81, 95% CI 0.32–2.03, respectively). Moderate certainty evidence showed that gonadotrophins reduced the time to conception leading to a live birth when compared to CC (6 RCTs, 2058 women, HR 1.37, 95% CI 1.15–1.63, I2 = 22%). No strong evidence on the treatment–covariate (female age, BMI or primary versus secondary infertility) interactions was found. WIDER IMPLICATIONS In couples with unexplained infertility undergoing IUI-OS, gonadotrophins increased the chance of a live birth and reduced the time to conception compared to CC, at the cost of a higher multiple pregnancy rate, when not differentiating strategies on cancellation criteria or the starting dose. The treatment effects did not seem to differ in women of different age, BMI or primary versus secondary infertility. In a modern practice where a lower starting dose and stricter cancellation criteria are in place, effectiveness and safety of different agents seem both acceptable, and therefore intervention availability, cost and patients’ preferences should factor in the clinical decision-making. As the evidence for comparisons to letrozole is based on one RCT providing IPD, further RCTs comparing letrozole and other interventions for unexplained infertility are needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J A Wessel
- Amsterdam UMC location University of Amsterdam, Centre for Reproductive Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Amsterdam Reproduction and Development Research Institute, Meibergdreef 9, 1105 AZ, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - N A Danhof
- Amsterdam UMC location University of Amsterdam, Centre for Reproductive Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Amsterdam Reproduction and Development Research Institute, Meibergdreef 9, 1105 AZ, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - R van Eekelen
- Amsterdam UMC location University of Amsterdam, Centre for Reproductive Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Amsterdam Reproduction and Development Research Institute, Meibergdreef 9, 1105 AZ, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - M P Diamond
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Augusta University, Augusta, GA 30912, USA
| | - R S Legro
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Penn State College of Medicine, Hershey, PA 17033, USA
| | - K Peeraer
- UZ Leuven, Leuven University Fertility Center, Leuven 3000, Belgium
| | - T M D’Hooghe
- Merck Healthcare KGaA, Darmstadt 64293, Germany
- Department of Development and Regeneration, Group Biomedical Sciences, KU Leuven/University of Leuven, Leuven 3000, Belgium
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Yale University, New Haven, CT 06520, USA
| | - M Erdem
- Faculty of Medicine, Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Gazi University, Ankara 06560, Turkey
| | - T Dankert
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Rijnstate Hospital Arnhem, 06560 Ankara, The Netherlands
| | - B J Cohlen
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Isala Fertility Center, 8025 AB Zwolle, The Netherlands
| | - C Thyagaraju
- Department of OBG, Jawaharlal Institute of Postgraduate Medical education and Research (JIPMER), Pondicherry 605006, India
| | - B W J Mol
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Monash University, Clayton, VIC 3168, Australia
- Aberdeen Centre for Women’s Health Research, School of Medicine, Medical Sciences and Nutrition, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen AB24 3FX, UK
| | - M Showell
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Auckland, Auckland 1142, New Zealand
| | - M van Wely
- Amsterdam UMC location University of Amsterdam, Centre for Reproductive Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Amsterdam Reproduction and Development Research Institute, Meibergdreef 9, 1105 AZ, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - M H Mochtar
- Amsterdam UMC location University of Amsterdam, Centre for Reproductive Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Amsterdam Reproduction and Development Research Institute, Meibergdreef 9, 1105 AZ, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - R Wang
- Correspondence address. Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Monash University, Level 5, Monash Medical Centre, 246 Clayton Road, Clayton, VIC 3168, Australia. E-mail:
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Tšuiko O, Vanneste M, Melotte C, Ding J, Debrock S, Masset H, Peters M, Salumets A, De Leener A, Pirard C, Kluyskens C, Hostens K, van de Vijver A, Peeraer K, Denayer E, Vermeesch JR, Dimitriadou E. Haplotyping-based preimplantation genetic testing reveals parent-of-origin specific mechanisms of aneuploidy formation. NPJ Genom Med 2021; 6:81. [PMID: 34620870 PMCID: PMC8497526 DOI: 10.1038/s41525-021-00246-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/27/2021] [Accepted: 09/16/2021] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Chromosome instability is inherent to human IVF embryos, but the full spectrum and developmental fate of chromosome anomalies remain uncharacterized. Using haplotyping-based preimplantation genetic testing for monogenic diseases (PGT-M), we mapped the parental and mechanistic origin of common and rare genomic abnormalities in 2300 cleavage stage and 361 trophectoderm biopsies. We show that while single whole chromosome aneuploidy arises due to chromosome-specific meiotic errors in the oocyte, segmental imbalances predominantly affect paternal chromosomes, implicating sperm DNA damage in segmental aneuploidy formation. We also show that postzygotic aneuploidy affects multiple chromosomes across the genome and does not discriminate between parental homologs. In addition, 6% of cleavage stage embryos demonstrated signatures of tripolar cell division with excessive chromosome loss, however hypodiploid blastomeres can be excluded from further embryo development. This observation supports the selective-pressure hypothesis in embryos. Finally, considering that ploidy violations may constitute a significant proportion of non-viable embryos, using haplotyping-based approach to map these events might further improve IVF success rate.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Olga Tšuiko
- Department of Human Genetics, Centre for Human Genetics, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, 3000, Belgium.,Laboratory of Cytogenetics and Genome Research, Centre for Human Genetics, KU Leuven, Leuven, 3000, Belgium
| | - Michiel Vanneste
- Department of Human Genetics, Centre for Human Genetics, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, 3000, Belgium
| | - Cindy Melotte
- Department of Human Genetics, Centre for Human Genetics, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, 3000, Belgium
| | - Jia Ding
- Department of Human Genetics, Centre for Human Genetics, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, 3000, Belgium
| | - Sophie Debrock
- Leuven University Fertility Center, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, 3000, Belgium
| | - Heleen Masset
- Laboratory of Cytogenetics and Genome Research, Centre for Human Genetics, KU Leuven, Leuven, 3000, Belgium
| | - Maire Peters
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Tartu, Tartu, 50406, Estonia
| | - Andres Salumets
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Tartu, Tartu, 50406, Estonia
| | - Anne De Leener
- Centre for Human Genetics, Cliniques Universitaires Saint Luc, UCLouvain, Brussels, 1200, Belgium
| | - Céline Pirard
- Department of Gynaecology, Cliniques Universitaires Saint Luc, UCLouvain, Brussels, 1200, Belgium
| | - Candice Kluyskens
- Department of Gynaecology, Cliniques Universitaires Saint Luc, UCLouvain, Brussels, 1200, Belgium
| | - Katleen Hostens
- Centre for Reproductive Medicine (CRG)-Brugge-Kortrijk, AZ Sint-Jan Brugge-Oostende AV, Brugge, 8000, Belgium
| | - Arne van de Vijver
- Centre for Reproductive Medicine (CRG)-Brugge-Kortrijk, AZ Sint-Jan Brugge-Oostende AV, Brugge, 8000, Belgium
| | - Karen Peeraer
- Leuven University Fertility Center, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, 3000, Belgium
| | - Ellen Denayer
- Department of Human Genetics, Centre for Human Genetics, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, 3000, Belgium
| | - Joris Robert Vermeesch
- Department of Human Genetics, Centre for Human Genetics, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, 3000, Belgium. .,Laboratory of Cytogenetics and Genome Research, Centre for Human Genetics, KU Leuven, Leuven, 3000, Belgium.
| | - Eftychia Dimitriadou
- Department of Human Genetics, Centre for Human Genetics, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, 3000, Belgium.
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Tomassetti C, Beukeleirs T, Conforti A, Debrock S, Peeraer K, Meuleman C, D'Hooghe T. The ultra-long study: a randomized controlled trial evaluating long-term GnRH downregulation prior to ART in women with endometriosis. Hum Reprod 2021; 36:2676-2686. [PMID: 34370858 DOI: 10.1093/humrep/deab163] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/10/2020] [Revised: 05/20/2021] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
STUDY QUESTION Does ultra-long downregulation with a GnRH agonist (triptorelin depot) in previously operated patients with endometriosis improve the rate of clinical pregnancy with positive fetal heart beat (CPHB) in the subsequent initiated fresh ART cycle? SUMMARY ANSWER Ultra-long downregulation with a GnRH agonist prior to ART did not improve the rate of CPHB in the subsequent fresh ART cycle in previously completely operated patients but the trial was underpowered due to early termination. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY Administration of GnRH agonists for a period of 3-6 months prior to ART in women with endometriosis may increase the odds of clinical pregnancy. However, the quality of the studies on which this statement is based is questionable, so these findings need confirmation. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION A controlled, randomized, open label trial was performed between 1 June 2013 and 31 December 2016 (start and end of recruitment, respectively). Patients with prior complete laparoscopic treatment of any type or stage of endometriosis and an indication for ART were randomized (by a computer-generated allocation sequence) into two groups: the control group underwent ART stimulation in a classical long agonist protocol using preparation with oral contraceptives, the ultra-long group first underwent at least 3 months downregulation followed by a long agonist protocol for ART stimulation. The sample size was calculated to detect a superiority of the ultra-long downregulation protocol, based on the hypothesis that baseline CPHB rate in the control group of 20% would increase to 40% in the ultra-long group. For a power of 20% at a significance level of 5%, based on two-sided testing, including 5% of patients lost to follow-up, the necessary sample size was 172 patients (86 per group). PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS This trial was conducted at the Leuven University Fertility Center, a tertiary care center for endometriosis and infertility, and a total of 42 patients were randomized (21 in the control group and 21 in the ultra-long group). MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE Baseline characteristics were similar in both groups. The primary outcome studied-CPHB after the initiated ART treatment-did not differ and was 25% (5/20) in the control group, and 20% (4/20) in the ultra-long group (P > 0.999; relative risk (RR) 1.25, 95% CI 0.41-3.88). Cumulative (fresh + associated frozen) CPHB rates were also similar in the control versus ultra-long group (8/20, 40% vs 6/20, 30%, P = 0.7411; RR = 1.33, 95% CI 0.57-3.19). When other secondary outcomes were compared with the ultra-long group, patients from the control group had a shorter duration of stimulation (mean 11.8 days (SD ± 2.4) versus 13.2 days (SD ± 1.5), P = 0.0373), a lower total dose of gonadotrophins used (mean 1793 IU/d (SD ± 787) vs 2329 (SD ± 680), P = 0.0154), and a higher serum estradiol concentration (ng/ml) at the end of ovarian stimulation on the day of ovulation triggering or cycle cancellation (mean1971 (SD ± 1495) vs 929 (± 548); P = 0.0326), suggesting a better ovarian response in the control group. LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION Due to a strong patient preference, nearly exclusively against ultra-long downregulation (even though patients were thoroughly informed of the potential benefits), the targeted sample size could not be achieved and the trial was stopped prematurely. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS Conditional power analysis revealed that the probability of confirming the study hypothesis if the study were completed would be low. We hypothesize that in patients with prior complete surgical treatment of endometriosis, the ultra-long protocol does not enhance ART-CPHB rates. Patient's concerns and preferences regarding possible side-effects, and delay of ART treatment start with the ultra-long protocol should be taken into account when considering this type of treatment in women with endometriosis. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S) C.T. was during 2 years funded by a grant from the Clinical research Foundation of UZ Leuven (KOF) and during 2 years by the Research Foundation-Flanders (FWO grant number: 1700816N). C.T. reports grants from Clinical Research Foundation of the University Hospitals of Leuven (KOF), grants from Fund for Scientific Research Flanders (FWO), during the conduct of the study; grants, non-financial support and other from Merck SA, non-financial support and other from Gedeon Richter, non-financial support from Ferring Pharmaceuticals, outside the submitted work. T.D. is vice president and head of Global Medical Affairs Fertility, Research and Development, Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany. He is also a professor in Reproductive Medicine and Biology at the Department of Development and Regeneration, Group Biomedical Sciences, KU Leuven (University of Leuven), Belgium and an adjunct professor at the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology in the University of Yale, New Haven, USA. Neither his corporate role nor his academic roles represent a conflict of interest with respect to the work done by him for this study. A.C. reports personal fees from Merck S.p.A., outside the submitted work. The other co-authors have no conflict of interest. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER UZ Leuven trial registry SS55300, EudraCT number 2013-000993-32, clinicaltrials.gov NCT02400801. TRIAL REGISTRATION DATE Registration for EudraCT on 1 March 2013. DATE OF FIRST PATIENT’S ENROLMENT 4 September 2013.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C Tomassetti
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Leuven University Fertility Center, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.,Department of Development and Regeneration, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - T Beukeleirs
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Leuven University Fertility Center, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - A Conforti
- Department of Neuroscience, Reproductive Science and Odontostomatology, University of Naples 'Federico II', Naples, Italy
| | - S Debrock
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Leuven University Fertility Center, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.,Department of Development and Regeneration, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - K Peeraer
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Leuven University Fertility Center, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.,Department of Development and Regeneration, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - C Meuleman
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Leuven University Fertility Center, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.,Department of Development and Regeneration, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - T D'Hooghe
- Department of Development and Regeneration, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Dias L, De Loecker P, D’Hooghe TM, Peeraer K, Dancet E. O-166 A smartphone video clip on the patient journey to reduce patient’s anxiety: a randomized controlled trial. Hum Reprod 2021. [DOI: 10.1093/humrep/deab127.034] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Abstract
Study question
Can a smartphone video clip detailing the patient journey decrease the anxiety of women and men on the day of their first oocyte aspiration?
Summary answer
The video clip does not affect the anxiety of women but does reduce the anxiety of men on the day of couples’ first oocyte aspiration.
What is known already
Infertility and in vitro fertilisation (IVF) decrease the personal wellbeing of women and men. Couples shared that this contributed to their IVF discontinuation despite a good prognosis and reimbursement of IVF. Previous longitudinal studies confirmed that pre-IVF anxiety is associated with IVF discontinuation. Limiting treatment anxiety is, therefore, relevant for fertility patients and clinics. Studies from the field of reproductive medicine examining the effect of preparatory information on anxiety suggest that focussed interventions seem more effective than complex interventions. Several randomized controlled trials (RCTs) found that preparatory information movies reduce anxiety for out-patient cardiology procedures in women and men.
Study design, size, duration
This monocentric RCT randomized (1:1 allocation; computerized) 190 heterosexual couples about to start their first IVF cycle between care as usual (i.e. preparatory information session 1-3 months before IVF) and care as usual combined with a novel intervention during a 24 months recruitment period (2018-2020). The novel intervention is a 5-minute smartphone video clip detailing the patient journey on the day of oocyte aspiration, which was sent to both partners the day before oocyte aspiration.
Participants/materials, setting, methods
Upon arrival at a private fertility clinic for their first oocyte aspiration women and men independently filled out the ‘STAI-State anxiety inventory’ and the ‘infertility distress scale (IDS)’ and evaluated the novel intervention, if applicable. A minority of randomized couples didn’t comply with the standard IVF trajectory (n = 27) or didn’t fill out the questionnaires (n = 8). The data of 155 couples (76-79/group, a-priori sample size calculation requested minimally 76/group) was subjected to a modified intention-to-treat analysis.
Main results and the role of chance
Women and men were on average 33 and 35 years old, respectively. Couples had a mean duration of infertility of 27 months and 63 of them (41%) had tried intrauterine insemination. The background variables were equally distributed between the intervention (IG) and control group (CG). The video clip did not affect women’s anxiety on the day of oocyte aspiration (mean STAI-State score IG 42.7±8.1 vs CG 42.1±8.5, p = 0.67). However, men who watched the video clip were significantly less anxious than men who did not watch it (mean STAI-State score IG 35.8±6.4 vs CG 38.2±7.6, p = 0.04). Surprisingly, infertility-specific distress was higher among women and men who watched the video clip (mean IDS scores of 25.8±4.9 and 22.6±5.0, respectively), as compared to women (p = 0.05) and men (p = 0.02) who did not watch the video clip (mean IDS score 24.3±4.6 and 20.8±4.7, respectively). All women and men of the intervention group, except one woman, would recommend the video clip to friends and family going through IVF. The intervention and control group did not differ significantly regarding clinical pregnancy rate (31/76 vs. 29/79, p = 0.60) or miscarriage rate (2/76 vs. 3/79, p = 0.68) 12 weeks after their first oocyte aspiration.
Limitations, reasons for caution
Patients nor assessors were blinded and there was no attention control group. Selection bias is plausible although the participation rate was 89%. Assessing infertility-specific distress the day after watching the video clip was not optimal, as priming couples to feel infertility-specific distress short term is less problematic than longer term.
Wider implications of the findings
Providing additional procedural information is interesting for clinics as patients recommended the video clip and as it decreased men’s anxiety. A follow-up study should examine whether the video clip’s priming effect on infertility-specific distress lasts longer than only the day after and whether the video clip affects IVF discontinuation.
Trial registration number
NCT03717805
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- L Dias
- KU Leuven, Vrouw & Kind, Leuven, Belgium
| | - P De Loecker
- GZA Ziekenhuizen, Gynaecologie - Verloskunde - Fertiliteit, Wilrijk, Belgium
| | - T M D’Hooghe
- KU Leuven, Vrouw & Kind, Leuven, Belgium
- Merck Healthcare KGaA, Global Medical Affairs Fertility, Darmstadt, Germany
| | - K Peeraer
- KU Leuven, Vrouw & Kind, Leuven, Belgium
- UZ Leuven, Leuvens Universitair Fertiliteitscentrum, Leuven, Belgium
| | - E Dancet
- KU Leuven, Vrouw & Kind, Leuven, Belgium
- Research Foundation Flanders FWO, Postdoctoral Fellow, Brussel, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Devroe J, Peeraer K, D’Hooghe T, Boivin J, Vriens J, Dancet E. O-196 The impact of providing couples with their IVF-prognosis on the expectations and anxiety of women and men. Hum Reprod 2021. [DOI: 10.1093/humrep/deab128.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Abstract
Study question
What is the impact of providing couples with their IVF-prognosis on expectations and anxiety in women and men on the day of embryo transfer?
Summary answer
Only couples with a less than average IVF-prognosis updated their high expectations and IVF-prognosis was negatively associated with anxiety, especially in women.
What is known already
Female IVF-patients are known to expect a pregnancy rate per IVF-cycle of no less than 49-55%. Qualitative interviews and a survey showed that well informed women expect unrealistically high pregnancy rates as they think that their (family’s) fertility and their clinic is better than average. Several prognostic models have recently been published. The adapted van Loendersloot model including clinical and laboratory characteristics proved performant for our clinic (AUC=0.74) and was validated internally (Devroe et al, BMJ Open, 2020). The impact of providing couples with their IVF-prognosis on expectations and wellbeing of female and male patients has yet to be studied.
Study design, size, duration
A prospective survey, questioning a final sample of 148 partnered individuals, completing their 2nd-6th IVF-cycle (2019-2020) in a University clinic, on the days of oocyte aspiration (OA) and fresh embryo transfer (ET). Thirty other partnered individuals declined participation (participation rate=85%) and 26 were excluded due to ET-cancellation. The IVF-prognosis (live birth rate, LBR, per completed IVF-cycle including fresh and frozen ETs from the same ovarian stimulation) was calculated with the adapted van Loendersloot model.
Participants/materials, setting, methods
Each partner reported their perception of their expected IVF-LBR on a visual analogue scale on the day OA. After being informed on their IVF-prognosis by gynaecologists, they re-rated their expected IVF-LBR and filled out the reliable ‘STAI-State-Anxiety Inventory’ on the day of fresh ET. Linear mixed models, taking account of partnering and assessing the association with gender, explored whether individuals updated their expected IVF-LBR after receiving their IVF-prognosis and whether IVF-prognosis and anxiety were associated.
Main results and the role of chance
The mean IVF-prognosis was 30.9% (±16.8). The 148 partnered individuals had a mean expected IVF-LBR of 59.1% (±20.0) on the day of OA (no gender effect; p = 0.079). After being informed on their IVF-prognosis (day of ET), women’s and men’s mean expected IVF-LBR was 50.9% (±24.5) and 58.1% (±22.1), respectively (gender effect; p = 0.002). Linear mixed models, including couple and time as random factors, did not show an effect of time on expected IVF-LBRs (p = 0.15). Although women were more likely than men to update their expected IVF-LBR (p = 0.002), the updates were not significantly different from the IVF-LBR expected on the day of OA (p = 0.10). Women were more anxious than men (41.5±10.6 and 21.9±7.2, respectively, p < 0.001) after being given their IVF-prognosis. Linear mixed models, including couple as a random factor, showed an association between IVF-prognosis and anxiety (p = 0.016), especially in women (gender effect; p = 0.004). Subgroup analysis showed that partnered individuals with lower than average prognoses (n = 78) did update their expected IVF-LBR (p = 0.036) while others (n = 70) did not update their expected IVF-LBR (p = 0.761). Among the subgroup with lower prognoses women were more likely to update their expected IVF-LBR than men (p = 0.013), while no gender effect was observed among the subgroup with higher IVF-prognoses (p = 0.078).
Limitations, reasons for caution
This is an explorative study in preparation of an adequately powered randomized controlled trial, testing whether couples who are informed on their IVF-prognosis update their expected IVF-LBR and whether this causes anxiety, as compared to care as usual in which couples are not informed on their IVF-prognosis.
Wider implications of the findings
Men and especially women with a less than average prognosis update their IVF-expectations after having received this prognosis which may trigger anxious reactions. These findings should be re-examined in an RCT. Following up the effect of sharing IVF-prognoses on longer-term distress and IVF-discontinuation would be interesting.
Trial registration number
not applicable
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J Devroe
- Leuven University Hospital, Gynaecology, Leuven, Belgium
- Laboratory of Endometrium- Endometriosis & Reproductive Medicine- KU Leuven, Department of Development and Regeneration, Leuven, Belgium
| | - K Peeraer
- Leuven University Hospital, Gynaecology, Leuven, Belgium
- Laboratory of Endometrium- Endometriosis & Reproductive Medicine- KU Leuven, Department of Development and Regeneration, Leuven, Belgium
| | - T D’Hooghe
- Global Medical Affairs Fertility- Merck Healthcare KGaA, Research and Development, Darmstadt, Germany
- Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences Yale School of Medicine, Department of Obstetrics-, New Haven- CT-, U.S.A
- KU Leuven, Department of Development and Regeneration, Leuven, Belgium
| | - J Boivin
- Cardiff University, School of Psychology, Cardiff, United Kingdom
| | - J Vriens
- Laboratory of Endometrium- Endometriosis & Reproductive Medicine- KU Leuven, Department of Development and Regeneration, Leuven, Belgium
| | - E Dancet
- Laboratory of Endometrium- Endometriosis & Reproductive Medicine- KU Leuven, Department of Development and Regeneration, Leuven, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Van Steijvoort E, Devolder H, Geysen I, Van Epperzeel S, Peeters H, Peeraer K, Matthijs G, Borry P. Expanded carrier screening in Flanders (Belgium): an online survey on the perspectives of nonpregnant reproductive-aged women. Per Med 2021; 18:361-373. [PMID: 34086508 DOI: 10.2217/pme-2020-0155] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/21/2022]
Abstract
Aim: Despite a considerable interest in expanded carrier screening (ECS) in the general population, actual uptake of ECS remains low. More insights are needed to better understand the perspectives of reproductive-aged individuals. Materials & methods: Nonpregnant women of reproductive age recruited through public pharmacies throughout Flanders (Belgium) were invited to participate in an online survey. Results: Most participants (63.6%) indicated they would consider ECS for themselves in the future. About one in two participants showed a positive attitude toward ECS. Conclusion: This study reports valuable insights in the perspectives of nonpregnant reproductive-aged women in Flanders (Belgium) regarding ECS that can be used in the ongoing debate on the responsible implementation of ECS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eva Van Steijvoort
- Department of Public Health & Primary Care, Centre for Biomedical Ethics & Law, KU Leuven, Leuven 3000, Belgium
| | - Heleen Devolder
- Department of Public Health & Primary Care, Centre for Biomedical Ethics & Law, KU Leuven, Leuven 3000, Belgium
| | - Inne Geysen
- Department of Public Health & Primary Care, Centre for Biomedical Ethics & Law, KU Leuven, Leuven 3000, Belgium
| | - Silke Van Epperzeel
- Department of Public Health & Primary Care, Centre for Biomedical Ethics & Law, KU Leuven, Leuven 3000, Belgium
| | - Hilde Peeters
- Department of Human Genetics, Laboratory for Genetic Epidemiology, KU Leuven, Leuven 3000, Belgium
| | - Karen Peeraer
- Department of Development & Regeneration, Woman & Child, KU Leuven, Leuven 3000, Belgium
| | - Gert Matthijs
- Department of Human Genetics, Laboratory for Molecular Diagnosis, KU Leuven, Leuven 3000, Belgium
| | - Pascal Borry
- Department of Public Health & Primary Care, Centre for Biomedical Ethics & Law, KU Leuven, Leuven 3000, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Ding J, Dimitriadou E, Tšuiko O, Destouni A, Melotte C, Van Den Bogaert K, Debrock S, Jatsenko T, Esteki MZ, Voet T, Peeraer K, Denayer E, Vermeesch JR. Identity-by-state-based haplotyping expands the application of comprehensive preimplantation genetic testing. Hum Reprod 2021; 35:718-726. [PMID: 32198505 DOI: 10.1093/humrep/dez285] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/26/2019] [Revised: 11/27/2019] [Accepted: 12/06/2019] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Abstract
STUDY QUESTION Is it possible to haplotype parents using parental siblings to leverage preimplantation genetic testing (PGT) for monogenic diseases and aneuploidy (comprehensive PGT) by genome-wide haplotyping? SUMMARY ANSWER We imputed identity-by-state (IBS) sharing of parental siblings to phase parental genotypes. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY Genome-wide haplotyping of preimplantation embryos is being implemented as a generic approach for genetic diagnosis of inherited single-gene disorders. To enable the phasing of genotypes into haplotypes, genotyping the direct family members of the prospective parent carrying the mutation is required. Current approaches require genotypes of either (i) both or one of the parents of the affected prospective parent or (ii) an affected or an unaffected child of the couple. However, this approach cannot be used when parents or children are not attainable, prompting an investigation into alternative phasing options. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION This is a retrospective validation study, which applied IBS-based phasing of parental haplotypes in 56 embryos derived from 12 PGT families. Genome-wide haplotypes and copy number profiles generated for each embryo using the new phasing approach were compared with the reference PGT method to evaluate the diagnostic concordance. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS This study included 12 couples with a known hereditary genetic disorder, participating in the comprehensive PGT program and with at least one parental sibling available (e.g. brother and/or sister). Genotyping data from both prospective parents and the parental sibling(s) were used to perform IBS-based phasing and to trace the disease-associated alleles. The outcome of the IBS-based PGT was compared with the results of the clinically implemented reference haplotyping-based PGT method. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE IBS-based haplotyping was performed for 12 PGT families. In accordance with the theoretical prediction of allele sharing between sibling pairs, 6 out of 12 (50%) couples or 23 out of 56 embryos could be phased using parental siblings. In families where phasing was possible, haplotype calling in the locus of interest was 100% concordant between the reference PGT method and IBS-based approach using parental siblings. LARGE SCALE DATA N/A. LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION Phasing of parental haplotypes will only be possible when the disease locus lies in an informative region (categorized as IBS1). Phasing prospective parents using relatives with reduced genetic relatedness as a reference (e.g. siblings) decreases the size and the occurrence of informative IBS1 regions, necessary for haplotype calling. By including more than one extended family member, the chance of obtaining IBS1 coverage in the interrogated locus can be increased. A pre-PGT work-up can define whether the carrier couple could benefit from this approach. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS Phasing by relatives extends the potential of comprehensive PGT, since it allows the inclusion of couples who do not have access to the standard phasing references, such as parents or offspring. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S) The study was funded by the KU Leuven grant (C14/18/092), Research Foundation Flanders (FWO; GA09311N), Horizon 2020 innovation programme (WIDENLIFE, 692065) and Agilent Technologies. J.R.V., T.V. and M.Z.E. are co-inventors of a patent ZL910050-PCT/EP2011/060211-WO/2011/157846 'Methods for haplotyping single-cells' and ZL913096-PCT/EP2014/068315-WO/2015/028576 'Haplotyping and copy number typing using polymorphic variant allelic frequencies' licensed to Agilent Technologies. The other authors have no conflict of interest to declare.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jia Ding
- Department of Human Genetics, Centre for Human Genetics, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven 3000, Belgium
| | - Eftychia Dimitriadou
- Department of Human Genetics, Centre for Human Genetics, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven 3000, Belgium
| | - Olga Tšuiko
- Laboratory of Cytogenetics and Genome Research, Centre for Human Genetics, KU Leuven, Leuven 3000, Belgium
| | - Aspasia Destouni
- Laboratory of Cytogenetics and Genome Research, Centre for Human Genetics, KU Leuven, Leuven 3000, Belgium.,Department of Biological Sciences, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, LA 70803 USA.,Department of Comparative Biomedical Sciences, Louisiana State University School of Veterinary Medicine, Baton Rouge, LA 70803, USA
| | - Cindy Melotte
- Department of Human Genetics, Centre for Human Genetics, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven 3000, Belgium
| | - Kris Van Den Bogaert
- Department of Human Genetics, Centre for Human Genetics, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven 3000, Belgium
| | - Sophie Debrock
- Leuven University Fertility Center, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven 3000, Belgium
| | - Tatjana Jatsenko
- Laboratory of Cytogenetics and Genome Research, Centre for Human Genetics, KU Leuven, Leuven 3000, Belgium
| | - Masoud Zamani Esteki
- Department of Human Genetics, Centre for Human Genetics, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven 3000, Belgium.,Department of Clinical Genetics, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht 6229 HX, The Netherlands.,Department of Genetics and Cell Biology, GROW School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University, 6229 ER, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Thierry Voet
- Laboratory of Reproductive Genomics, Centre for Human Genetics, KU Leuven, Leuven 3000, Belgium
| | - Karen Peeraer
- Leuven University Fertility Center, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven 3000, Belgium
| | - Ellen Denayer
- Department of Human Genetics, Centre for Human Genetics, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven 3000, Belgium
| | - Joris Robert Vermeesch
- Department of Human Genetics, Centre for Human Genetics, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven 3000, Belgium.,Laboratory of Cytogenetics and Genome Research, Centre for Human Genetics, KU Leuven, Leuven 3000, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Devroe J, Peeraer K, Verbeke G, Spiessens C, Vriens J, Dancet E. Predicting the chance on live birth per cycle at each step of the IVF journey: external validation and update of the van Loendersloot multivariable prognostic model. BMJ Open 2020; 10:e037289. [PMID: 33033089 PMCID: PMC7545639 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-037289] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To study the performance of the 'van Loendersloot' prognostic model for our clinic's in vitro fertilisation (IVF) in its original version, the refitted version and in an adapted version replacing previous by current cycle IVF laboratory variables. METHODS This retrospective cohort study in our academic tertiary fertility clinic analysed 1281 IVF cycles of 591 couples, who completed at least one 2nd-6th IVF cycle with own fresh gametes after a previous IVF cycle with the same partner in our clinic between 2010 and 2018. The outcome of interest was the chance on a live birth after one complete IVF cycle (including all fresh and frozen embryo transfers from the same episode of ovarian stimulation). Model performance was expressed in terms of discrimination (c-statistics) and calibration (calibration model, comparison of prognosis to observed ratios of five disjoint groups formed by the quintiles of the IVF prognoses and a calibration plot). RESULTS A total of 344 live births were obtained (26.9%). External validation of the original van Loendersloot model showed a poor c-statistic of 0.64 (95% CI: 0.61 to 0.68) and an underestimation of IVF success. The refitted and the adapted models showed c-statistics of respectively 0.68 (95% CI: 0.65 to 0.71) and 0.74 (95% CI: 0.70 to 0.77). Similar c-statistics were found with cross-validation. Both models showed a good calibration model; refitted model: intercept=0.00 (95% CI: -0.23 to 0.23) and slope=1.00 (95% CI: 0.79 to 1.21); adapted model: intercept=0.00 (95% CI: -0.18 to 0.18) and slope=1.00 (95% CI: 0.83 to 1.17). Prognoses and observed success rates of the disjoint groups matched well for the refitted model and even better for the adapted model. CONCLUSION External validation of the original van Loendersloot model indicated that model updating was recommended. The good performance of the refitted and adapted models allows informing couples about their IVF prognosis prior to an IVF cycle and at the time of embryo transfer. Whether this has an impact on couple's expected success rates, distress and IVF discontinuation can now be studied.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Johanna Devroe
- Leuven University Fertility Centre, University Hospital Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
- Development and Regeneration, Laboratory of Endometrium, Endometriosis & Reproductive Medicine, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Karen Peeraer
- Leuven University Fertility Centre, University Hospital Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
- Development and Regeneration, Laboratory of Endometrium, Endometriosis & Reproductive Medicine, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Geert Verbeke
- Public Health and Primary Care, Leuven Biostatistics and statistical Bioinformatics Centre, Leuven, Belgium
- Interuniversity Institute for Biostatistics and Statistical Bioinformatics, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Carl Spiessens
- Leuven University Fertility Centre, University Hospital Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Joris Vriens
- Development and Regeneration, Laboratory of Endometrium, Endometriosis & Reproductive Medicine, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Eline Dancet
- Leuven University Fertility Centre, University Hospital Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
- Development and Regeneration, Laboratory of Endometrium, Endometriosis & Reproductive Medicine, Leuven, Belgium
- Postdoctoral fellow, Research Foundation, Flanders, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Masset H, Zamani Esteki M, Dimitriadou E, Dreesen J, Debrock S, Derhaag J, Derks K, Destouni A, Drüsedau M, Meekels J, Melotte C, Peeraer K, Tšuiko O, van Uum C, Allemeersch J, Devogelaere B, François KO, Happe S, Lorson D, Richards RL, Theuns J, Brunner H, de Die-Smulders C, Voet T, Paulussen A, Coonen E, Vermeesch JR. Multi-centre evaluation of a comprehensive preimplantation genetic test through haplotyping-by-sequencing. Hum Reprod 2020; 34:1608-1619. [PMID: 31348829 DOI: 10.1093/humrep/dez106] [Citation(s) in RCA: 34] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/18/2019] [Revised: 05/16/2019] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
STUDY QUESTION Can reduced representation genome sequencing offer an alternative to single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) arrays as a generic and genome-wide approach for comprehensive preimplantation genetic testing for monogenic disorders (PGT-M), aneuploidy (PGT-A) and structural rearrangements (PGT-SR) in human embryo biopsy samples? SUMMARY ANSWER Reduced representation genome sequencing, with OnePGT, offers a generic, next-generation sequencing-based approach for automated haplotyping and copy-number assessment, both combined or independently, in human single blastomere and trophectoderm samples. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY Genome-wide haplotyping strategies, such as karyomapping and haplarithmisis, have paved the way for comprehensive PGT, i.e. leveraging PGT-M, PGT-A and PGT-SR in a single workflow. These methods are based upon SNP array technology. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION This multi-centre verification study evaluated the concordance of PGT results for a total of 225 embryos, including 189 originally tested for a monogenic disorder and 36 tested for a translocation. Concordance for whole chromosome aneuploidies was also evaluated where whole genome copy-number reference data were available. Data analysts were kept blind to the results from the reference PGT method. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS Leftover blastomere/trophectoderm whole genome amplified (WGA) material was used, or secondary trophectoderm biopsies were WGA. A reduced representation library from WGA DNA together with bulk DNA from phasing references was processed across two study sites with the Agilent OnePGT solution. Libraries were sequenced on an Illumina NextSeq500 system, and data were analysed with Agilent Alissa OnePGT software. The embedded PGT-M pipeline utilises the principles of haplarithmisis to deduce haplotype inheritance whereas both the PGT-A and PGT-SR pipelines are based upon read-count analysis in order to evaluate embryonic ploidy. Concordance analysis was performed for both analysis strategies against the reference PGT method. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE PGT-M analysis was performed on 189 samples. For nine samples, the data quality was too poor to analyse further, and for 20 samples, no result could be obtained mainly due to biological limitations of the haplotyping approach, such as co-localisation of meiotic crossover events and nullisomy for the chromosome of interest. For the remaining 160 samples, 100% concordance was obtained between OnePGT and the reference PGT-M method. Equally for PGT-SR, 100% concordance for all 36 embryos tested was demonstrated. Moreover, with embryos originally analysed for PGT-M or PGT-SR for which genome-wide copy-number reference data were available, 100% concordance was shown for whole chromosome copy-number calls (PGT-A). LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION Inherent to haplotyping methodologies, processing of additional family members is still required. Biological limitations caused inconclusive results in 10% of cases. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS Employment of OnePGT for PGT-M, PGT-SR, PGT-A or combined as comprehensive PGT offers a scalable platform, which is inherently generic and thereby, eliminates the need for family-specific design and optimisation. It can be considered as both an improvement and complement to the current methodologies for PGT. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S) Agilent Technologies, the KU Leuven (C1/018 to J.R.V. and T.V.) and the Horizon 2020 WIDENLIFE (692065 to J.R.V. and T.V). H.M. is supported by the Research Foundation Flanders (FWO, 11A7119N). M.Z.E, J.R.V. and T.V. are co-inventors on patent applications: ZL910050-PCT/EP2011/060211- WO/2011/157846 'Methods for haplotyping single cells' and ZL913096-PCT/EP2014/068315 'Haplotyping and copy-number typing using polymorphic variant allelic frequencies'. T.V. and J.R.V. are co-inventors on patent application: ZL912076-PCT/EP2013/070858 'High-throughput genotyping by sequencing'. Haplarithmisis ('Haplotyping and copy-number typing using polymorphic variant allelic frequencies') has been licensed to Agilent Technologies. The following patents are pending for OnePGT: US2016275239, AU2014345516, CA2928013, CN105874081, EP3066213 and WO2015067796. OnePGT is a registered trademark. D.L., J.T. and R.L.R. report personal fees during the conduct of the study and outside the submitted work from Agilent Technologies. S.H. and K.O.F. report personal fees and other during the conduct of the study and outside the submitted work from Agilent Technologies. J.A. reports personal fees and other during the conduct of the study from Agilent Technologies and personal fees from Agilent Technologies and UZ Leuven outside the submitted work. B.D. reports grants from IWT/VLAIO, personal fees during the conduct of the study from Agilent Technologies and personal fees and other outside the submitted work from Agilent Technologies. In addition, B.D. has a patent 20160275239 - Genetic Analysis Method pending. The remaining authors have no conflicts of interest.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Heleen Masset
- Laboratory for Cytogenetics and Genome Research, Department of Human Genetics, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Masoud Zamani Esteki
- Laboratory for Cytogenetics and Genome Research, Department of Human Genetics, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.,Department of Clinical Genetics, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands.,Research Institute GROW, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | | | - Jos Dreesen
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands.,Research Institute GROW, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Sophie Debrock
- Leuven University Fertility Center, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Josien Derhaag
- Research Institute GROW, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands.,Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Kasper Derks
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Aspasia Destouni
- Laboratory for Cytogenetics and Genome Research, Department of Human Genetics, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.,Department of Biological Sciences, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, LA, USA.,Department of Comparative Biomedical Sciences, Louisiana State University School of Veterinary Medicine, Baton Rouge, LA, USA
| | - Marion Drüsedau
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Jeroen Meekels
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Cindy Melotte
- Center for Human Genetics, University Hospitals of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Karen Peeraer
- Leuven University Fertility Center, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Olga Tšuiko
- Laboratory for Cytogenetics and Genome Research, Department of Human Genetics, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Chris van Uum
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Joke Allemeersch
- Diagnostics and Genomics Group, Agilent Technologies, Heverlee, Belgium
| | | | | | - Scott Happe
- Diagnostics and Genomics Group, Agilent Technologies, Cedar Creek, TX, USA
| | - Dennis Lorson
- Diagnostics and Genomics Group, Agilent Technologies, Heverlee, Belgium
| | - Rebecca Louise Richards
- Diagnostics and Genomics Group, Agilent Technologies, Heverlee, Belgium.,Diagnostics and Genomics Group, Agilent Technologies, Niel, Belgium
| | - Jessie Theuns
- Diagnostics and Genomics Group, Agilent Technologies, Niel, Belgium
| | - Han Brunner
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands.,Research Institute GROW, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Christine de Die-Smulders
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands.,Research Institute GROW, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Thierry Voet
- Laboratory of Reproductive Genomics, Department of Human Genetics, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Aimée Paulussen
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands.,Research Institute GROW, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Edith Coonen
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands.,Research Institute GROW, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Joris Robert Vermeesch
- Laboratory for Cytogenetics and Genome Research, Department of Human Genetics, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.,Center for Human Genetics, University Hospitals of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Van Steijvoort E, Chokoshvili D, W Cannon J, Peeters H, Peeraer K, Matthijs G, Borry P. Interest in expanded carrier screening among individuals and couples in the general population: systematic review of the literature. Hum Reprod Update 2020; 26:335-355. [DOI: 10.1093/humupd/dmaa001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/11/2019] [Revised: 11/27/2019] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Abstract
BACKGROUND
Through carrier screening, prospective parents can acquire information about whether they have an increased risk of conceiving a child affected with an autosomal recessive or X-linked condition. Within the last decade, advances in genomic technologies have facilitated a shift from condition-directed carrier screening to expanded carrier screening (ECS). Following the introduction of ECS, several studies have been performed to gauge the interest in this new technology among individuals and couples in the general population.
OBJECTIVE AND RATIONALE
The aim of this systematic review was to synthesize evidence from empirical studies that assess the interest in ECS among individuals and couples in the general population. As the availability and accessibility of ECS grow, more couples who are a priori not at risk based on their personal or family history will be presented with the choice to accept or decline such an offer. Their attitudes and beliefs, as well as the perceived usefulness of this screening modality, will likely determine whether ECS is to become a widespread reproductive genetic test.
SEARCH METHODS
Four databases (Pubmed, Web of Science, CINAHL, Cochrane Library) were systematically searched to identify English language studies performed between January 2009 and January 2019 using the following search terms: carrier screening, carrier testing, attitudes, intention, interest, views, opinions, perspectives and uptake. Studies were eligible for inclusion if they reported on intentions to undergo a (hypothetical) ECS test, uptake of an actual ECS offer or both. Two researchers performed a multistep selection process independently for validation purposes.
OUTCOMES
Twelve empirical studies performed between 2015 and 2019 were included for analysis. The studies originated from the USA (n = 6), the Netherlands (n = 3), Belgium (n = 1), Sweden (n = 1) and Australia (n = 1). The sample size of the studies varied from 80 to 1669. In the included studies, 32%–76% of respondents were interested in a (hypothetical) ECS test, while uptake rates for actual ECS offers ranged from 8% to 50%. The highest overall uptake was observed when ECS was offered to pregnant women (50%). By contrast, studies focusing on the preconception population reported lower overall uptake rates (8–34%) with the exception of one study where women were counseled preconception in preparation for IVF (68.7%).
WIDER IMPLICATIONS
Our findings suggest that there may be discrepancies between prospective parents’ reported intentions to undergo ECS and their actual uptake, particularly during the preconception period. As ECS is a new and relatively unknown test for most future parents, the awareness and comprehension within the general population could be rather limited. Adequate pre- and post-test counseling services should be made available to couples offered ECS to ensure informed reproductive decision-making, together with guidelines for primary health care professionals. Due to restricted nature of the samples and methods of the underlying primary studies, some of the reported results might not be transferable to a broader population. More research is needed to see if the observed trends also apply to a broader and more diverse population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eva Van Steijvoort
- Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Centre for Biomedical Ethics and Law, KU Leuven, 3000 Leuven, Belgium
| | - Davit Chokoshvili
- Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Centre for Biomedical Ethics and Law, KU Leuven, 3000 Leuven, Belgium
| | - Jeffrey W Cannon
- Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Case Western Reserve University/University Hospitals, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Hilde Peeters
- Department of Human Genetics, KU Leuven, 3000 Leuven, Belgium
| | - Karen Peeraer
- Department of Development and Regeneration, Woman and Child, KU Leuven, 3000 Leuven, Belgium
| | - Gert Matthijs
- Department of Human Genetics, Laboratory for Molecular Diagnosis, KU Leuven, 3000 Leuven, Belgium
| | - Pascal Borry
- Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Centre for Biomedical Ethics and Law, KU Leuven, 3000 Leuven, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Boedt T, Dancet E, Lie Fong S, Peeraer K, De Neubourg D, Pelckmans S, van de Vijver A, Seghers J, Van der Gucht K, Van Calster B, Spiessens C, Matthys C. Effectiveness of a mobile preconception lifestyle programme in couples undergoing in vitro fertilisation (IVF): the protocol for the PreLiFe randomised controlled trial (PreLiFe-RCT). BMJ Open 2019; 9:e029665. [PMID: 31366659 PMCID: PMC6678004 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-029665] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Infertility and in vitro fertilisation (IVF; with or without intracytoplasmic sperm injection) result in considerable emotional and financial burden. Increasing evidence suggests that lifestyle factors, including diet, physical activity and personal well-being, are associated with IVF-success rates. Currently, IVF is not routinely combined with a lifestyle programme. The preconception lifestyle (PreLiFe) randomised controlled trial (RCT) assesses the effects of a new mobile PreLiFe programme in couples undergoing IVF. METHODS AND ANALYSIS A multicentre RCT including 460 heterosexual couples starting IVF in Belgian fertility clinics. IVF couples are randomised between an attention control group or the PreLiFe programme for a period of 12 months or until an ongoing pregnancy is confirmed by ultrasound. The attention control programme includes a mobile application with treatment information (ie, appointments and medication instructions) in addition to standard care. The PreLiFe programme includes a mobile application with the same treatment information in combination with a lifestyle programme. This new lifestyle programme includes tailored advice and skills training on diet, physical activity and mindfulness in combination with text messages and telephone interaction with a healthcare professional trained in motivational interviewing. The primary outcome of this RCT is the cumulative ongoing pregnancy rate within 12 months after randomisation. Secondary outcomes include changes in diet, physical activity, emotional distress, body mass index, waist circumference, quality of life and other reproductive outcomes including IVF discontinuation, clinical pregnancy rate and time to pregnancy. Additionally, partner support and the feasibility (use and acceptability) of the PreLiFe programme will be evaluated in the intervention group. Analysis will be according to intention to treat. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION This study has been approved by the Medical Ethical Committee of the Leuven University Hospital (Belgium) and the other recruiting clinics. The findings of this RCT will be disseminated through presentations at international scientific meetings and peer-reviewed publications. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER NCT03790449; Pre-results.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tessy Boedt
- Department of Chronic Diseases Metabolism and Ageing, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
- Leuven University Fertility Centre, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Eline Dancet
- Leuven University Fertility Centre, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
- Department of Development and Regeneration, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Sharon Lie Fong
- Leuven University Fertility Centre, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Karen Peeraer
- Leuven University Fertility Centre, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
- Department of Development and Regeneration, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Diane De Neubourg
- Antwerp University Hospital, Centre for Reproductive Medicine, Edegem, Belgium
| | - Sofie Pelckmans
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Imelda Hospital Bonheiden, Bonheiden, Belgium
| | - Arne van de Vijver
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, General Hospital Sint Jan Bruges-Ostend, Brugge, Belgium
| | - Jan Seghers
- Department of Movement Sciences, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Katleen Van der Gucht
- Leuven Mindfulness Centre, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
- Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Ben Van Calster
- Department of Development and Regeneration, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
- Department of Biomedical Data Sciences, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, Netherlands
| | - Carl Spiessens
- Leuven University Fertility Centre, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
- Department of Development and Regeneration, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Christophe Matthys
- Department of Chronic Diseases Metabolism and Ageing, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
- Department of Endocrinology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Destouni A, Dimitriadou E, Masset H, Debrock S, Melotte C, Van Den Bogaert K, Zamani Esteki M, Ding J, Voet T, Denayer E, de Ravel T, Legius E, Meuleman C, Peeraer K, Vermeesch JR. Genome-wide haplotyping embryos developing from 0PN and 1PN zygotes increases transferrable embryos in PGT-M. Hum Reprod 2019; 33:2302-2311. [PMID: 30383227 PMCID: PMC6238370 DOI: 10.1093/humrep/dey325] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/25/2018] [Accepted: 10/14/2018] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
STUDY QUESTION Can genome-wide haplotyping increase success following preimplantation genetic testing for a monogenic disorder (PGT-M) by including zygotes with absence of pronuclei (0PN) or the presence of only one pronucleus (1PN)? SUMMARY ANSWER Genome-wide haplotyping 0PNs and 1PNs increases the number of PGT-M cycles reaching embryo transfer (ET) by 81% and the live-birth rate by 75%. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY Although a significant subset of 0PN and 1PN zygotes can develop into balanced, diploid and developmentally competent embryos, they are usually discarded because parental diploidy detection is not part of the routine work-up of PGT-M. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION This prospective cohort study evaluated the pronuclear number in 2229 zygotes from 2337 injected metaphase II (MII) oocytes in 268 cycles. PGT-M for 0PN and 1PN embryos developing into Day 5/6 blastocysts with adequate quality for vitrification was performed in 42 of the 268 cycles (15.7%). In these 42 cycles, we genome-wide haplotyped 216 good quality embryos corresponding to 49 0PNs, 15 1PNs and 152 2PNs. The reported outcomes include parental contribution to embryonic ploidy, embryonic aneuploidy, genetic diagnosis for the monogenic disorder, cycles reaching ETs, pregnancy and live birth rates (LBR) for unaffected offspring. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS Blastomere DNA was whole-genome amplified and hybridized on the Illumina Human CytoSNP12V2.1.1 BeadChip arrays. Subsequently, genome-wide haplotyping and copy-number profiling was applied to investigate the embryonic genome architecture. Bi-parental, unaffected embryos were transferred regardless of their initial zygotic PN score. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE A staggering 75.51% of 0PN and 42.86% of 1PN blastocysts are diploid bi-parental allowing accurate genetic diagnosis for the monogenic disorder. In total, 31% (13/42) of the PGT-M cycles reached ET or could repeat ET with an unaffected 0PN or 1PN embryo. The LBR per initiated cycle increased from 9.52 to 16.67%. LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION The clinical efficacy of the routine inclusion of 0PN and 1PN zygotes in PGT-M cycles should be confirmed in larger cohorts from multicenter studies. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS Genome-wide haplotyping allows the inclusion of 0PN and 1PN embryos and subsequently increases the cycles reaching ET following PGT-M and potentially PGT for aneuploidy (PGT-A) and chromosomal structural rearrangements (PGT-SR). Establishing measures of clinical efficacy could lead to an update of the ESHRE guidelines which advise against the use of these zygotes. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S) SymBioSys (PFV/10/016 and C1/018 to J.R.V. and T.V.), the Horizon 2020 WIDENLIFE: 692065 to J.R.V., T.V., E.D., A.D. and M.Z.E. M.Z.E., T.V. and J.R.V. co-invented haplarithmisis (‘Haplotyping and copy-number typing using polymorphic variant allelic frequencies’), which has been licensed to Agilent Technologies. H.M. is fully supported by the (FWO) (ZKD1543-ASP/16). The authors have no competing interests to declare.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aspasia Destouni
- Laboratory for Cytogenetics and Genome Research, Center for Human Genetics, University of Leuven, O&N I Herestraat 49, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Eftychia Dimitriadou
- Department of Human Genetics, Center for Human Genetics, University Hospitals Leuven, O&N I Herestraat 49, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Heleen Masset
- Laboratory for Cytogenetics and Genome Research, Center for Human Genetics, University of Leuven, O&N I Herestraat 49, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Sophie Debrock
- University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven University Fertility Center, Herestraat 49, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Cindy Melotte
- Department of Human Genetics, Center for Human Genetics, University Hospitals Leuven, O&N I Herestraat 49, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Kris Van Den Bogaert
- Department of Human Genetics, Center for Human Genetics, University Hospitals Leuven, O&N I Herestraat 49, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Masoud Zamani Esteki
- Department of Human Genetics, Center for Human Genetics, University Hospitals Leuven, O&N I Herestraat 49, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.,Maastricht University Medical Center, Department of Clinical Genetics, GROW School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Jia Ding
- Laboratory for Cytogenetics and Genome Research, Center for Human Genetics, University of Leuven, O&N I Herestraat 49, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Thiery Voet
- Laboratory of Reproductive Genomics, Center for Human Genetics, University of Leuven, O&N I Herestraat 49, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.,Wellcome Sanger Institute, Wellcome Genome Campus Hinxton, Cambridgeshire, UK
| | - Ellen Denayer
- Department of Human Genetics, Center for Human Genetics, University Hospitals Leuven, O&N I Herestraat 49, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Thomy de Ravel
- Department of Human Genetics, Center for Human Genetics, University Hospitals Leuven, O&N I Herestraat 49, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Eric Legius
- Department of Human Genetics, Center for Human Genetics, University Hospitals Leuven, O&N I Herestraat 49, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Christel Meuleman
- University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven University Fertility Center, Herestraat 49, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Karen Peeraer
- University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven University Fertility Center, Herestraat 49, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Joris R Vermeesch
- Laboratory for Cytogenetics and Genome Research, Center for Human Genetics, University of Leuven, O&N I Herestraat 49, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.,Department of Human Genetics, Center for Human Genetics, University Hospitals Leuven, O&N I Herestraat 49, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Hendriks S, van Wely M, D'Hooghe TM, Meissner A, Mol F, Peeraer K, Repping S, Dancet EAF. The relative importance of genetic parenthood. Reprod Biomed Online 2019; 39:103-110. [PMID: 31006544 DOI: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2019.02.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/03/2018] [Revised: 02/22/2019] [Accepted: 02/26/2019] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
Abstract
RESEARCH QUESTION How much do patients with severe infertility and their gynaecologists value genetic parenthood relative to other key treatment characteristics? DESIGN A discrete choice experiment included the following treatment characteristics: genetic parenthood, pregnancy rate, curing infertility, maternal health, child health and costs. The questionnaire was disseminated between 2015 and 2016 among Dutch and Belgian patients with severe infertility and their gynaecologists. RESULTS The questionnaire was completed by 173 patients and 111 gynaecologists. When choosing between treatments that varied in safety, effectiveness and costs, the treatment's ability to lead to genetic parenthood did not affect the treatment preference of patients with severe infertility (n = 173). Genetic parenthood affected the treatment preference of gynaecologists (n = 111) less than all other treatment characteristics. Patients indicated that they would switch to a treatment that did not enable genetic parenthood in return for a child health risk reduction of 3.6%, a cost reduction of €3500, an ovarian hyperstimulation risk reduction of 4.6%, a maternal cancer risk reduction of 2.7% or a pregnancy rate increase of 18%. Gynaecologists made similar trade-offs. CONCLUSIONS While awaiting replication of this study in larger populations, these findings challenge the presumed dominant importance of genetic parenthood. This raises questions about whether donor gametes could be presented as a worthy alternative earlier in treatment trajectories and whether investments in novel treatments enabling genetic parenthood, like in-vitro gametogenesis, are proportional to their future clinical effect.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Saskia Hendriks
- Center for Reproductive Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Amsterdam University Medical Center, University of Amsterdam Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Department of Bioethics, Clinical Center, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda MD, USA
| | - Madelon van Wely
- Center for Reproductive Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Amsterdam University Medical Center, University of Amsterdam Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Thomas M D'Hooghe
- Department of Development and Regeneration, KU Leuven-University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Andreas Meissner
- Center for Reproductive Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Amsterdam University Medical Center, University of Amsterdam Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Femke Mol
- Center for Reproductive Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Amsterdam University Medical Center, University of Amsterdam Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Karen Peeraer
- Leuven University Fertility Clinic, Department of Development and Regeneration, KU Leuven-University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Sjoerd Repping
- Center for Reproductive Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Amsterdam University Medical Center, University of Amsterdam Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - Eline A F Dancet
- Center for Reproductive Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Amsterdam University Medical Center, University of Amsterdam Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Department of Development and Regeneration, KU Leuven-University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Hennes A, Held K, Boretto M, De Clercq K, Van den Eynde C, Vanhie A, Van Ranst N, Benoit M, Luyten C, Peeraer K, Tomassetti C, Meuleman C, Voets T, Vankelecom H, Vriens J. Functional expression of the mechanosensitive PIEZO1 channel in primary endometrial epithelial cells and endometrial organoids. Sci Rep 2019; 9:1779. [PMID: 30741991 PMCID: PMC6370865 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-018-38376-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 33] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/17/2018] [Accepted: 12/20/2018] [Indexed: 12/27/2022] Open
Abstract
Successful pregnancy requires the establishment of a complex dialogue between the implanting embryo and the endometrium. Knowledge regarding molecular candidates involved in this early communication process is inadequate due to limited access to primary human endometrial epithelial cells (EEC). Since pseudo-pregnancy in rodents can be induced by mechanical scratching of an appropriately primed uterus, this study aimed to investigate the expression of mechanosensitive ion channels in EEC. Poking of EEC provoked a robust calcium influx and induced an increase in current densities, which could be blocked by an inhibitor of mechanosensitive ion channels. Interestingly, RNA expression studies showed high expression of PIEZO1 in EEC of mouse and human. Additional analysis provided further evidence for the functional expression of PIEZO1 since stimulation with Yoda1, a chemical agonist of PIEZO1, induced increases in intracellular calcium concentrations and current densities in EEC. Moreover, the ion channel profile of human endometrial organoids (EMO) was validated as a representative model for endometrial epithelial cells. Mechanical and chemical stimulation of EMO induced strong calcium responses supporting the hypothesis of mechanosensitive ion channel expression in endometrial epithelial cells. In conclusion, EEC and EMO functionally express the mechanosensitive PIEZO1 channel that could act as a potential target for the development of novel treatments to further improve successful implantation processes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aurélie Hennes
- Laboratory of Endometrium, Endometriosis & Reproductive Medicine, Department of Development and Regeneration, KU Leuven, Herestraat 49 box 611, 3000, Leuven, Belgium
- Laboratory of Ion Channel Research, Department of Cellular and Molecular Medicine, KU Leuven, VIB Center for Brain & Disease Research, Herestraat 49 box 802, 3000, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Katharina Held
- Laboratory of Endometrium, Endometriosis & Reproductive Medicine, Department of Development and Regeneration, KU Leuven, Herestraat 49 box 611, 3000, Leuven, Belgium
- Laboratory of Ion Channel Research, Department of Cellular and Molecular Medicine, KU Leuven, VIB Center for Brain & Disease Research, Herestraat 49 box 802, 3000, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Matteo Boretto
- Laboratory of Tissue Plasticity in Health and Disease, Cluster of Stem Cell and Developmental Biology, Department of Development and Regeneration, KU Leuven, Herestraat 49 box 804, 3000, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Katrien De Clercq
- Laboratory of Endometrium, Endometriosis & Reproductive Medicine, Department of Development and Regeneration, KU Leuven, Herestraat 49 box 611, 3000, Leuven, Belgium
- Laboratory of Ion Channel Research, Department of Cellular and Molecular Medicine, KU Leuven, VIB Center for Brain & Disease Research, Herestraat 49 box 802, 3000, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Charlotte Van den Eynde
- Laboratory of Endometrium, Endometriosis & Reproductive Medicine, Department of Development and Regeneration, KU Leuven, Herestraat 49 box 611, 3000, Leuven, Belgium
- Laboratory of Ion Channel Research, Department of Cellular and Molecular Medicine, KU Leuven, VIB Center for Brain & Disease Research, Herestraat 49 box 802, 3000, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Arne Vanhie
- Laboratory of Endometrium, Endometriosis & Reproductive Medicine, Department of Development and Regeneration, KU Leuven, Herestraat 49 box 611, 3000, Leuven, Belgium
- Leuven University Fertility Centre, University Hospitals Leuven, Herestraat 49, 3000, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Nele Van Ranst
- Laboratory of Ion Channel Research, Department of Cellular and Molecular Medicine, KU Leuven, VIB Center for Brain & Disease Research, Herestraat 49 box 802, 3000, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Melissa Benoit
- Laboratory of Ion Channel Research, Department of Cellular and Molecular Medicine, KU Leuven, VIB Center for Brain & Disease Research, Herestraat 49 box 802, 3000, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Catherine Luyten
- Laboratory of Endometrium, Endometriosis & Reproductive Medicine, Department of Development and Regeneration, KU Leuven, Herestraat 49 box 611, 3000, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Karen Peeraer
- Laboratory of Endometrium, Endometriosis & Reproductive Medicine, Department of Development and Regeneration, KU Leuven, Herestraat 49 box 611, 3000, Leuven, Belgium
- Leuven University Fertility Centre, University Hospitals Leuven, Herestraat 49, 3000, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Carla Tomassetti
- Laboratory of Endometrium, Endometriosis & Reproductive Medicine, Department of Development and Regeneration, KU Leuven, Herestraat 49 box 611, 3000, Leuven, Belgium
- Leuven University Fertility Centre, University Hospitals Leuven, Herestraat 49, 3000, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Christel Meuleman
- Laboratory of Endometrium, Endometriosis & Reproductive Medicine, Department of Development and Regeneration, KU Leuven, Herestraat 49 box 611, 3000, Leuven, Belgium
- Leuven University Fertility Centre, University Hospitals Leuven, Herestraat 49, 3000, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Thomas Voets
- Laboratory of Ion Channel Research, Department of Cellular and Molecular Medicine, KU Leuven, VIB Center for Brain & Disease Research, Herestraat 49 box 802, 3000, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Hugo Vankelecom
- Laboratory of Tissue Plasticity in Health and Disease, Cluster of Stem Cell and Developmental Biology, Department of Development and Regeneration, KU Leuven, Herestraat 49 box 804, 3000, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Joris Vriens
- Laboratory of Endometrium, Endometriosis & Reproductive Medicine, Department of Development and Regeneration, KU Leuven, Herestraat 49 box 611, 3000, Leuven, Belgium.
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Lensen S, Osavlyuk D, Armstrong S, Stadelmann C, Hennes A, Napier E, Wilkinson J, Sadler L, Gupta D, Strandell A, Bergh C, Vigneswaran K, Teh WT, Hamoda H, Webber L, Wakeman SA, Searle L, Bhide P, McDowell S, Peeraer K, Khalaf Y, Farquhar C. A Randomized Trial of Endometrial Scratching before In Vitro Fertilization. N Engl J Med 2019; 380:325-334. [PMID: 30673547 DOI: 10.1056/nejmoa1808737] [Citation(s) in RCA: 119] [Impact Index Per Article: 23.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Endometrial scratching (with the use of a pipelle biopsy) is a technique proposed to facilitate embryo implantation and increase the probability of pregnancy in women undergoing in vitro fertilization (IVF). METHODS We conducted a pragmatic, multicenter, open-label, randomized, controlled trial. Eligible women were undergoing IVF (fresh-embryo or frozen-embryo transfer), with no recent exposure to disruptive intrauterine instrumentation (e.g., hysteroscopy). Participants were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to either endometrial scratching (by pipelle biopsy between day 3 of the cycle preceding the embryo-transfer cycle and day 3 of the embryo-transfer cycle) or no intervention. The primary outcome was live birth. RESULTS A total of 1364 women underwent randomization. The frequency of live birth was 180 of 690 women (26.1%) in the endometrial-scratch group and 176 of 674 women (26.1%) in the control group (adjusted odds ratio, 1.00; 95% confidence interval, 0.78 to 1.27). There were no significant between-group differences in the rates of ongoing pregnancy, clinical pregnancy, multiple pregnancy, ectopic pregnancy, or miscarriage. The median score for pain from endometrial scratching (on a scale of 0 to 10, with higher scores indicating worse pain) was 3.5 (interquartile range, 1.9 to 6.0). CONCLUSIONS Endometrial scratching did not result in a higher rate of live birth than no intervention among women undergoing IVF. (Funded by the University of Auckland and others; PIP Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry number, ACTRN12614000626662 .).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sarah Lensen
- From the Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Auckland (S.L., D.O., C.F.), and Women's Health (L. Sadler) and Fertility Plus (D.G., C.F.), Auckland District Health Board, Auckland, Fertility Associates, Christchurch (S.A.W.), and Fertility Associates, Wellington (L. Searle, S.M.) - all in New Zealand; Bath Fertility Centre, Bath (S.A., E.N.), the Department of Medical Statistics, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester (J.W.), and the Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, King's College Hospital (K.V., H.H.), University College Hospital (L.W.), Homerton Fertility Centre, Homerton University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust (P.B.), and Guy's Hospital (Y.K.), London - all in the United Kingdom; the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Institute of Clinical Sciences, University of Gothenburg, Reproductive Medicine, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden (C.S., A.S., C.B.); Leuven University Fertility Center, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospitals, Leuven, Belgium (A.H., K.P.); and Reproductive Services, Royal Women's Hospital, Melbourne, VIC, Australia (W.T.T.)
| | - Diana Osavlyuk
- From the Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Auckland (S.L., D.O., C.F.), and Women's Health (L. Sadler) and Fertility Plus (D.G., C.F.), Auckland District Health Board, Auckland, Fertility Associates, Christchurch (S.A.W.), and Fertility Associates, Wellington (L. Searle, S.M.) - all in New Zealand; Bath Fertility Centre, Bath (S.A., E.N.), the Department of Medical Statistics, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester (J.W.), and the Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, King's College Hospital (K.V., H.H.), University College Hospital (L.W.), Homerton Fertility Centre, Homerton University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust (P.B.), and Guy's Hospital (Y.K.), London - all in the United Kingdom; the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Institute of Clinical Sciences, University of Gothenburg, Reproductive Medicine, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden (C.S., A.S., C.B.); Leuven University Fertility Center, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospitals, Leuven, Belgium (A.H., K.P.); and Reproductive Services, Royal Women's Hospital, Melbourne, VIC, Australia (W.T.T.)
| | - Sarah Armstrong
- From the Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Auckland (S.L., D.O., C.F.), and Women's Health (L. Sadler) and Fertility Plus (D.G., C.F.), Auckland District Health Board, Auckland, Fertility Associates, Christchurch (S.A.W.), and Fertility Associates, Wellington (L. Searle, S.M.) - all in New Zealand; Bath Fertility Centre, Bath (S.A., E.N.), the Department of Medical Statistics, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester (J.W.), and the Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, King's College Hospital (K.V., H.H.), University College Hospital (L.W.), Homerton Fertility Centre, Homerton University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust (P.B.), and Guy's Hospital (Y.K.), London - all in the United Kingdom; the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Institute of Clinical Sciences, University of Gothenburg, Reproductive Medicine, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden (C.S., A.S., C.B.); Leuven University Fertility Center, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospitals, Leuven, Belgium (A.H., K.P.); and Reproductive Services, Royal Women's Hospital, Melbourne, VIC, Australia (W.T.T.)
| | - Caroline Stadelmann
- From the Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Auckland (S.L., D.O., C.F.), and Women's Health (L. Sadler) and Fertility Plus (D.G., C.F.), Auckland District Health Board, Auckland, Fertility Associates, Christchurch (S.A.W.), and Fertility Associates, Wellington (L. Searle, S.M.) - all in New Zealand; Bath Fertility Centre, Bath (S.A., E.N.), the Department of Medical Statistics, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester (J.W.), and the Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, King's College Hospital (K.V., H.H.), University College Hospital (L.W.), Homerton Fertility Centre, Homerton University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust (P.B.), and Guy's Hospital (Y.K.), London - all in the United Kingdom; the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Institute of Clinical Sciences, University of Gothenburg, Reproductive Medicine, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden (C.S., A.S., C.B.); Leuven University Fertility Center, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospitals, Leuven, Belgium (A.H., K.P.); and Reproductive Services, Royal Women's Hospital, Melbourne, VIC, Australia (W.T.T.)
| | - Aurélie Hennes
- From the Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Auckland (S.L., D.O., C.F.), and Women's Health (L. Sadler) and Fertility Plus (D.G., C.F.), Auckland District Health Board, Auckland, Fertility Associates, Christchurch (S.A.W.), and Fertility Associates, Wellington (L. Searle, S.M.) - all in New Zealand; Bath Fertility Centre, Bath (S.A., E.N.), the Department of Medical Statistics, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester (J.W.), and the Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, King's College Hospital (K.V., H.H.), University College Hospital (L.W.), Homerton Fertility Centre, Homerton University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust (P.B.), and Guy's Hospital (Y.K.), London - all in the United Kingdom; the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Institute of Clinical Sciences, University of Gothenburg, Reproductive Medicine, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden (C.S., A.S., C.B.); Leuven University Fertility Center, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospitals, Leuven, Belgium (A.H., K.P.); and Reproductive Services, Royal Women's Hospital, Melbourne, VIC, Australia (W.T.T.)
| | - Emma Napier
- From the Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Auckland (S.L., D.O., C.F.), and Women's Health (L. Sadler) and Fertility Plus (D.G., C.F.), Auckland District Health Board, Auckland, Fertility Associates, Christchurch (S.A.W.), and Fertility Associates, Wellington (L. Searle, S.M.) - all in New Zealand; Bath Fertility Centre, Bath (S.A., E.N.), the Department of Medical Statistics, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester (J.W.), and the Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, King's College Hospital (K.V., H.H.), University College Hospital (L.W.), Homerton Fertility Centre, Homerton University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust (P.B.), and Guy's Hospital (Y.K.), London - all in the United Kingdom; the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Institute of Clinical Sciences, University of Gothenburg, Reproductive Medicine, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden (C.S., A.S., C.B.); Leuven University Fertility Center, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospitals, Leuven, Belgium (A.H., K.P.); and Reproductive Services, Royal Women's Hospital, Melbourne, VIC, Australia (W.T.T.)
| | - Jack Wilkinson
- From the Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Auckland (S.L., D.O., C.F.), and Women's Health (L. Sadler) and Fertility Plus (D.G., C.F.), Auckland District Health Board, Auckland, Fertility Associates, Christchurch (S.A.W.), and Fertility Associates, Wellington (L. Searle, S.M.) - all in New Zealand; Bath Fertility Centre, Bath (S.A., E.N.), the Department of Medical Statistics, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester (J.W.), and the Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, King's College Hospital (K.V., H.H.), University College Hospital (L.W.), Homerton Fertility Centre, Homerton University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust (P.B.), and Guy's Hospital (Y.K.), London - all in the United Kingdom; the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Institute of Clinical Sciences, University of Gothenburg, Reproductive Medicine, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden (C.S., A.S., C.B.); Leuven University Fertility Center, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospitals, Leuven, Belgium (A.H., K.P.); and Reproductive Services, Royal Women's Hospital, Melbourne, VIC, Australia (W.T.T.)
| | - Lynn Sadler
- From the Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Auckland (S.L., D.O., C.F.), and Women's Health (L. Sadler) and Fertility Plus (D.G., C.F.), Auckland District Health Board, Auckland, Fertility Associates, Christchurch (S.A.W.), and Fertility Associates, Wellington (L. Searle, S.M.) - all in New Zealand; Bath Fertility Centre, Bath (S.A., E.N.), the Department of Medical Statistics, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester (J.W.), and the Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, King's College Hospital (K.V., H.H.), University College Hospital (L.W.), Homerton Fertility Centre, Homerton University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust (P.B.), and Guy's Hospital (Y.K.), London - all in the United Kingdom; the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Institute of Clinical Sciences, University of Gothenburg, Reproductive Medicine, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden (C.S., A.S., C.B.); Leuven University Fertility Center, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospitals, Leuven, Belgium (A.H., K.P.); and Reproductive Services, Royal Women's Hospital, Melbourne, VIC, Australia (W.T.T.)
| | - Devashana Gupta
- From the Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Auckland (S.L., D.O., C.F.), and Women's Health (L. Sadler) and Fertility Plus (D.G., C.F.), Auckland District Health Board, Auckland, Fertility Associates, Christchurch (S.A.W.), and Fertility Associates, Wellington (L. Searle, S.M.) - all in New Zealand; Bath Fertility Centre, Bath (S.A., E.N.), the Department of Medical Statistics, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester (J.W.), and the Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, King's College Hospital (K.V., H.H.), University College Hospital (L.W.), Homerton Fertility Centre, Homerton University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust (P.B.), and Guy's Hospital (Y.K.), London - all in the United Kingdom; the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Institute of Clinical Sciences, University of Gothenburg, Reproductive Medicine, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden (C.S., A.S., C.B.); Leuven University Fertility Center, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospitals, Leuven, Belgium (A.H., K.P.); and Reproductive Services, Royal Women's Hospital, Melbourne, VIC, Australia (W.T.T.)
| | - Annika Strandell
- From the Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Auckland (S.L., D.O., C.F.), and Women's Health (L. Sadler) and Fertility Plus (D.G., C.F.), Auckland District Health Board, Auckland, Fertility Associates, Christchurch (S.A.W.), and Fertility Associates, Wellington (L. Searle, S.M.) - all in New Zealand; Bath Fertility Centre, Bath (S.A., E.N.), the Department of Medical Statistics, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester (J.W.), and the Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, King's College Hospital (K.V., H.H.), University College Hospital (L.W.), Homerton Fertility Centre, Homerton University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust (P.B.), and Guy's Hospital (Y.K.), London - all in the United Kingdom; the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Institute of Clinical Sciences, University of Gothenburg, Reproductive Medicine, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden (C.S., A.S., C.B.); Leuven University Fertility Center, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospitals, Leuven, Belgium (A.H., K.P.); and Reproductive Services, Royal Women's Hospital, Melbourne, VIC, Australia (W.T.T.)
| | - Christina Bergh
- From the Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Auckland (S.L., D.O., C.F.), and Women's Health (L. Sadler) and Fertility Plus (D.G., C.F.), Auckland District Health Board, Auckland, Fertility Associates, Christchurch (S.A.W.), and Fertility Associates, Wellington (L. Searle, S.M.) - all in New Zealand; Bath Fertility Centre, Bath (S.A., E.N.), the Department of Medical Statistics, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester (J.W.), and the Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, King's College Hospital (K.V., H.H.), University College Hospital (L.W.), Homerton Fertility Centre, Homerton University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust (P.B.), and Guy's Hospital (Y.K.), London - all in the United Kingdom; the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Institute of Clinical Sciences, University of Gothenburg, Reproductive Medicine, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden (C.S., A.S., C.B.); Leuven University Fertility Center, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospitals, Leuven, Belgium (A.H., K.P.); and Reproductive Services, Royal Women's Hospital, Melbourne, VIC, Australia (W.T.T.)
| | - Kugajeevan Vigneswaran
- From the Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Auckland (S.L., D.O., C.F.), and Women's Health (L. Sadler) and Fertility Plus (D.G., C.F.), Auckland District Health Board, Auckland, Fertility Associates, Christchurch (S.A.W.), and Fertility Associates, Wellington (L. Searle, S.M.) - all in New Zealand; Bath Fertility Centre, Bath (S.A., E.N.), the Department of Medical Statistics, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester (J.W.), and the Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, King's College Hospital (K.V., H.H.), University College Hospital (L.W.), Homerton Fertility Centre, Homerton University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust (P.B.), and Guy's Hospital (Y.K.), London - all in the United Kingdom; the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Institute of Clinical Sciences, University of Gothenburg, Reproductive Medicine, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden (C.S., A.S., C.B.); Leuven University Fertility Center, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospitals, Leuven, Belgium (A.H., K.P.); and Reproductive Services, Royal Women's Hospital, Melbourne, VIC, Australia (W.T.T.)
| | - Wan T Teh
- From the Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Auckland (S.L., D.O., C.F.), and Women's Health (L. Sadler) and Fertility Plus (D.G., C.F.), Auckland District Health Board, Auckland, Fertility Associates, Christchurch (S.A.W.), and Fertility Associates, Wellington (L. Searle, S.M.) - all in New Zealand; Bath Fertility Centre, Bath (S.A., E.N.), the Department of Medical Statistics, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester (J.W.), and the Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, King's College Hospital (K.V., H.H.), University College Hospital (L.W.), Homerton Fertility Centre, Homerton University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust (P.B.), and Guy's Hospital (Y.K.), London - all in the United Kingdom; the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Institute of Clinical Sciences, University of Gothenburg, Reproductive Medicine, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden (C.S., A.S., C.B.); Leuven University Fertility Center, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospitals, Leuven, Belgium (A.H., K.P.); and Reproductive Services, Royal Women's Hospital, Melbourne, VIC, Australia (W.T.T.)
| | - Haitham Hamoda
- From the Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Auckland (S.L., D.O., C.F.), and Women's Health (L. Sadler) and Fertility Plus (D.G., C.F.), Auckland District Health Board, Auckland, Fertility Associates, Christchurch (S.A.W.), and Fertility Associates, Wellington (L. Searle, S.M.) - all in New Zealand; Bath Fertility Centre, Bath (S.A., E.N.), the Department of Medical Statistics, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester (J.W.), and the Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, King's College Hospital (K.V., H.H.), University College Hospital (L.W.), Homerton Fertility Centre, Homerton University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust (P.B.), and Guy's Hospital (Y.K.), London - all in the United Kingdom; the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Institute of Clinical Sciences, University of Gothenburg, Reproductive Medicine, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden (C.S., A.S., C.B.); Leuven University Fertility Center, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospitals, Leuven, Belgium (A.H., K.P.); and Reproductive Services, Royal Women's Hospital, Melbourne, VIC, Australia (W.T.T.)
| | - Lisa Webber
- From the Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Auckland (S.L., D.O., C.F.), and Women's Health (L. Sadler) and Fertility Plus (D.G., C.F.), Auckland District Health Board, Auckland, Fertility Associates, Christchurch (S.A.W.), and Fertility Associates, Wellington (L. Searle, S.M.) - all in New Zealand; Bath Fertility Centre, Bath (S.A., E.N.), the Department of Medical Statistics, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester (J.W.), and the Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, King's College Hospital (K.V., H.H.), University College Hospital (L.W.), Homerton Fertility Centre, Homerton University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust (P.B.), and Guy's Hospital (Y.K.), London - all in the United Kingdom; the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Institute of Clinical Sciences, University of Gothenburg, Reproductive Medicine, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden (C.S., A.S., C.B.); Leuven University Fertility Center, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospitals, Leuven, Belgium (A.H., K.P.); and Reproductive Services, Royal Women's Hospital, Melbourne, VIC, Australia (W.T.T.)
| | - Sarah A Wakeman
- From the Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Auckland (S.L., D.O., C.F.), and Women's Health (L. Sadler) and Fertility Plus (D.G., C.F.), Auckland District Health Board, Auckland, Fertility Associates, Christchurch (S.A.W.), and Fertility Associates, Wellington (L. Searle, S.M.) - all in New Zealand; Bath Fertility Centre, Bath (S.A., E.N.), the Department of Medical Statistics, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester (J.W.), and the Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, King's College Hospital (K.V., H.H.), University College Hospital (L.W.), Homerton Fertility Centre, Homerton University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust (P.B.), and Guy's Hospital (Y.K.), London - all in the United Kingdom; the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Institute of Clinical Sciences, University of Gothenburg, Reproductive Medicine, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden (C.S., A.S., C.B.); Leuven University Fertility Center, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospitals, Leuven, Belgium (A.H., K.P.); and Reproductive Services, Royal Women's Hospital, Melbourne, VIC, Australia (W.T.T.)
| | - Leigh Searle
- From the Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Auckland (S.L., D.O., C.F.), and Women's Health (L. Sadler) and Fertility Plus (D.G., C.F.), Auckland District Health Board, Auckland, Fertility Associates, Christchurch (S.A.W.), and Fertility Associates, Wellington (L. Searle, S.M.) - all in New Zealand; Bath Fertility Centre, Bath (S.A., E.N.), the Department of Medical Statistics, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester (J.W.), and the Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, King's College Hospital (K.V., H.H.), University College Hospital (L.W.), Homerton Fertility Centre, Homerton University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust (P.B.), and Guy's Hospital (Y.K.), London - all in the United Kingdom; the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Institute of Clinical Sciences, University of Gothenburg, Reproductive Medicine, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden (C.S., A.S., C.B.); Leuven University Fertility Center, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospitals, Leuven, Belgium (A.H., K.P.); and Reproductive Services, Royal Women's Hospital, Melbourne, VIC, Australia (W.T.T.)
| | - Priya Bhide
- From the Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Auckland (S.L., D.O., C.F.), and Women's Health (L. Sadler) and Fertility Plus (D.G., C.F.), Auckland District Health Board, Auckland, Fertility Associates, Christchurch (S.A.W.), and Fertility Associates, Wellington (L. Searle, S.M.) - all in New Zealand; Bath Fertility Centre, Bath (S.A., E.N.), the Department of Medical Statistics, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester (J.W.), and the Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, King's College Hospital (K.V., H.H.), University College Hospital (L.W.), Homerton Fertility Centre, Homerton University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust (P.B.), and Guy's Hospital (Y.K.), London - all in the United Kingdom; the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Institute of Clinical Sciences, University of Gothenburg, Reproductive Medicine, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden (C.S., A.S., C.B.); Leuven University Fertility Center, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospitals, Leuven, Belgium (A.H., K.P.); and Reproductive Services, Royal Women's Hospital, Melbourne, VIC, Australia (W.T.T.)
| | - Simon McDowell
- From the Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Auckland (S.L., D.O., C.F.), and Women's Health (L. Sadler) and Fertility Plus (D.G., C.F.), Auckland District Health Board, Auckland, Fertility Associates, Christchurch (S.A.W.), and Fertility Associates, Wellington (L. Searle, S.M.) - all in New Zealand; Bath Fertility Centre, Bath (S.A., E.N.), the Department of Medical Statistics, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester (J.W.), and the Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, King's College Hospital (K.V., H.H.), University College Hospital (L.W.), Homerton Fertility Centre, Homerton University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust (P.B.), and Guy's Hospital (Y.K.), London - all in the United Kingdom; the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Institute of Clinical Sciences, University of Gothenburg, Reproductive Medicine, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden (C.S., A.S., C.B.); Leuven University Fertility Center, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospitals, Leuven, Belgium (A.H., K.P.); and Reproductive Services, Royal Women's Hospital, Melbourne, VIC, Australia (W.T.T.)
| | - Karen Peeraer
- From the Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Auckland (S.L., D.O., C.F.), and Women's Health (L. Sadler) and Fertility Plus (D.G., C.F.), Auckland District Health Board, Auckland, Fertility Associates, Christchurch (S.A.W.), and Fertility Associates, Wellington (L. Searle, S.M.) - all in New Zealand; Bath Fertility Centre, Bath (S.A., E.N.), the Department of Medical Statistics, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester (J.W.), and the Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, King's College Hospital (K.V., H.H.), University College Hospital (L.W.), Homerton Fertility Centre, Homerton University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust (P.B.), and Guy's Hospital (Y.K.), London - all in the United Kingdom; the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Institute of Clinical Sciences, University of Gothenburg, Reproductive Medicine, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden (C.S., A.S., C.B.); Leuven University Fertility Center, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospitals, Leuven, Belgium (A.H., K.P.); and Reproductive Services, Royal Women's Hospital, Melbourne, VIC, Australia (W.T.T.)
| | - Yacoub Khalaf
- From the Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Auckland (S.L., D.O., C.F.), and Women's Health (L. Sadler) and Fertility Plus (D.G., C.F.), Auckland District Health Board, Auckland, Fertility Associates, Christchurch (S.A.W.), and Fertility Associates, Wellington (L. Searle, S.M.) - all in New Zealand; Bath Fertility Centre, Bath (S.A., E.N.), the Department of Medical Statistics, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester (J.W.), and the Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, King's College Hospital (K.V., H.H.), University College Hospital (L.W.), Homerton Fertility Centre, Homerton University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust (P.B.), and Guy's Hospital (Y.K.), London - all in the United Kingdom; the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Institute of Clinical Sciences, University of Gothenburg, Reproductive Medicine, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden (C.S., A.S., C.B.); Leuven University Fertility Center, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospitals, Leuven, Belgium (A.H., K.P.); and Reproductive Services, Royal Women's Hospital, Melbourne, VIC, Australia (W.T.T.)
| | - Cynthia Farquhar
- From the Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Auckland (S.L., D.O., C.F.), and Women's Health (L. Sadler) and Fertility Plus (D.G., C.F.), Auckland District Health Board, Auckland, Fertility Associates, Christchurch (S.A.W.), and Fertility Associates, Wellington (L. Searle, S.M.) - all in New Zealand; Bath Fertility Centre, Bath (S.A., E.N.), the Department of Medical Statistics, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester (J.W.), and the Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, King's College Hospital (K.V., H.H.), University College Hospital (L.W.), Homerton Fertility Centre, Homerton University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust (P.B.), and Guy's Hospital (Y.K.), London - all in the United Kingdom; the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Institute of Clinical Sciences, University of Gothenburg, Reproductive Medicine, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden (C.S., A.S., C.B.); Leuven University Fertility Center, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospitals, Leuven, Belgium (A.H., K.P.); and Reproductive Services, Royal Women's Hospital, Melbourne, VIC, Australia (W.T.T.)
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Hendriks S, Peeraer K, Bos H, Repping S, Dancet EAF. The importance of genetic parenthood for infertile men and women. Hum Reprod 2018; 32:2076-2087. [PMID: 28938731 DOI: 10.1093/humrep/dex256] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/19/2017] [Accepted: 07/25/2017] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Abstract
STUDY QUESTION Do men and women beginning to attend a fertility clinic prefer genetic over non-genetic parenthood? SUMMARY ANSWER Nearly, all infertile men and women prefer genetic parenthood. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY Clinicians assume that all infertile couples prefer genetic parenthood over non-genetic parenthood and, therefore, consider treatments with donor gametes an option of last resort. Previous studies of the desire for parenthood identified 30 motivations for genetic parenthood, and 51 motivations for which having a genetically related child is not strictly necessary but might be deemed required. The exact strength of the preference of infertile men and women for genetic parenthood remains unclear, as does the importance of the various motivations. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION A questionnaire was developed based on a literature review. It was assessed by professionals and pilot tested among patients. The coded paper-pencil questionnaire was disseminated among both partners of 201 heterosexual infertile couples after their first consultation at one of two Belgian fertility clinics between October 2015 and May 2016. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS The survey addressed: (i) the preference for genetic parenthood for themselves and for their partner, (ii) the importance of 30 motivations for genetic parenthood and (iii) the importance of 51 other motivations for parenthood and whether these motivations require being the genetic parent of their child to be fulfilled. To simplify presentation of the results, all 81 motivations were grouped into reliable categories of motivations using psychometric analyses. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE The survey was completed by 104 women and 91 men (response rate: 49%). Almost all respondents (98%) favored genetic over non-genetic parenthood for both their partner and themselves. One-third of the respondents stated they only wanted to parent their own genetically related child. Achieving genetic parenthood for their partner was considered significantly more important than achieving genetic parenthood for themselves. Within couples, men had a stronger preference for genetic parenthood (P = 0.004), but this was not significant after correction for educational level, which was significantly associated with the preference of both men and women. The 30 motivations for becoming a genetic parent clustered into 11 categories of which 'to experience a natural process' was deemed most important. The 51 motivations for becoming a parent for which having a genetically related child is not strictly necessary clustered into 14 categories of which 'to contribute to a child's well-being' and 'to experience the love of a child' were most important. Respondents deemed they would need to be the genetic parent of their child to fulfill nearly all their motivations for parenthood. LIMITATIONS REASONS FOR CAUTION We included couples that visited the fertility clinic for the first time, and the preference for genetic parenthood might change throughout a fertility treatment trajectory. Moreover, what prospective parents expect to be important for their future well-being might not really define parents' well-being. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS The presumed preference of couples for genetic parenthood was confirmed. Resistance against using donor gametes is more likely among lower educated individuals. Researching whether non-genetic parents actually feel they cannot fulfill the 51 motivations for parenthood, could be a basis for developing patient information. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S) Funded by the Parkes Foundation, the University of Amsterdam and the Leuven University Hospital. No conflict of interest.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S Hendriks
- Center for Reproductive Medicine, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - K Peeraer
- Leuven University Fertility Centre, Leuven University Hospital, Herestraat 49, 3000 Leuven, Belgium
| | - H Bos
- Faculty of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Research Institute of Child Development and Education, University of Amsterdam, Nieuwe Achtergracht 127, 1018 WS Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - S Repping
- Center for Reproductive Medicine, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - E A F Dancet
- Center for Reproductive Medicine, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Leuven University Fertility Clinic, Department of Development and Regeneration, KU Leuven-University of Leuven, Herestraat 49, 3000 Leuven, Belgium.,Research Foundation Flanders, Brussel, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Melotte C, Dimitriadou E, Debrock S, Devriendt K, De Ravel T, Legius E, Peeraer K, Vermeesch JR. Transfer of aneuploid embryos following preimplantation genetic diagnosis: the added value of a haplotyping-based genome-wide approach. Reprod Biomed Online 2018. [DOI: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2017.10.055] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
|
36
|
Peeraer K, Luyten J, Tomassetti C, Verschueren S, Spiessens C, Tanghe A, Meuleman C, Debrock S, Dancet E, D'Hooghe T. Cost-effectiveness of ovarian stimulation with gonadotrophin and clomiphene citrate in an intrauterine insemination programme for subfertile couples. Reprod Biomed Online 2018; 36:302-310. [DOI: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2017.12.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/02/2017] [Revised: 11/29/2017] [Accepted: 12/08/2017] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
|
37
|
Dimitriadou E, Melotte C, Debrock S, Esteki MZ, Dierickx K, Voet T, Devriendt K, de Ravel T, Legius E, Peeraer K, Meuleman C, Vermeesch JR. Principles guiding embryo selection following genome-wide haplotyping of preimplantation embryos. Hum Reprod 2017; 32:687-697. [PMID: 28158716 DOI: 10.1093/humrep/dex011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/29/2016] [Accepted: 01/13/2017] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
STUDY QUESTION How to select and prioritize embryos during PGD following genome-wide haplotyping? SUMMARY ANSWER In addition to genetic disease-specific information, the embryo selected for transfer is based on ranking criteria including the existence of mitotic and/or meiotic aneuploidies, but not carriership of mutations causing recessive disorders. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY Embryo selection for monogenic diseases has been mainly performed using targeted disease-specific assays. Recently, these targeted approaches are being complemented by generic genome-wide genetic analysis methods such as karyomapping or haplarithmisis, which are based on genomic haplotype reconstruction of cell(s) biopsied from embryos. This provides not only information about the inheritance of Mendelian disease alleles but also about numerical and structural chromosome anomalies and haplotypes genome-wide. Reflections on how to use this information in the diagnostic laboratory are lacking. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION We present the results of the first 101 PGD cycles (373 embryos) using haplarithmisis, performed in the Centre for Human Genetics, UZ Leuven. The questions raised were addressed by a multidisciplinary team of clinical geneticist, fertility specialists and ethicists. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS Sixty-three couples enrolled in the genome-wide haplotyping-based PGD program. Families presented with either inherited genetic variants causing known disorders and/or chromosomal rearrangements that could lead to unbalanced translocations in the offspring. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE Embryos were selected based on the absence or presence of the disease allele, a trisomy or other chromosomal abnormality leading to known developmental disorders. In addition, morphologically normal Day 5 embryos were prioritized for transfer based on the presence of other chromosomal imbalances and/or carrier information. LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION Some of the choices made and principles put forward are specific for cleavage-stage-based genetic testing. The proposed guidelines are subject to continuous update based on the accumulating knowledge from the implementation of genome-wide methods for PGD in many different centers world-wide as well as the results of ongoing scientific research. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS Our embryo selection principles have a profound impact on the organization of PGD operations and on the information that is transferred among the genetic unit, the fertility clinic and the patients. These principles are also important for the organization of pre- and post-counseling and influence the interpretation and reporting of preimplantation genotyping results. As novel genome-wide approaches for embryo selection are revolutionizing the field of reproductive genetics, national and international discussions to set general guidelines are warranted. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S) The European Union's Research and Innovation funding programs FP7-PEOPLE-2012-IAPP SARM: 324509 and Horizon 2020 WIDENLIFE: 692065 to J.R.V., T.V., E.D. and M.Z.E. J.R.V., T.V. and M.Z.E. have patents ZL910050-PCT/EP2011/060211-WO/2011/157846 ('Methods for haplotyping single cells') with royalties paid and ZL913096-PCT/EP2014/068315-WO/2015/028576 ('Haplotyping and copy-number typing using polymorphic variant allelic frequencies') with royalties paid, licensed to Cartagenia (Agilent technologies). J.R.V. also has a patent ZL91 2076-PCT/EP20 one 3/070858 ('High throughout genotyping by sequencing') with royalties paid. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER N/A.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eftychia Dimitriadou
- Department of Human Genetics, Centre for Human Genetics, University Hospitals Leuven, O&N I Herestraat 49 - box 602, KU Leuven, 3000 Leuven, Belgium
| | - Cindy Melotte
- Department of Human Genetics, Centre for Human Genetics, University Hospitals Leuven, O&N I Herestraat 49 - box 602, KU Leuven, 3000 Leuven, Belgium
| | - Sophie Debrock
- University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven University Fertility Center, Herestraat 49, 3000 Leuven, Belgium
| | - Masoud Zamani Esteki
- Department of Human Genetics, Centre for Human Genetics, University Hospitals Leuven, O&N I Herestraat 49 - box 602, KU Leuven, 3000 Leuven, Belgium
| | - Kris Dierickx
- Centre for Biomedical Ethics and Law, KU Leuven, 3000 Leuven, Belgium
| | - Thierry Voet
- Department of Human Genetics, Centre for Human Genetics, University Hospitals Leuven, O&N I Herestraat 49 - box 602, KU Leuven, 3000 Leuven, Belgium.,Single-cell Genomics Centre, Welcome Trust Sanger Institute, Hinxton CB10 1SA, UK
| | - Koen Devriendt
- Department of Human Genetics, Centre for Human Genetics, University Hospitals Leuven, O&N I Herestraat 49 - box 602, KU Leuven, 3000 Leuven, Belgium
| | - Thomy de Ravel
- Department of Human Genetics, Centre for Human Genetics, University Hospitals Leuven, O&N I Herestraat 49 - box 602, KU Leuven, 3000 Leuven, Belgium
| | - Eric Legius
- Department of Human Genetics, Centre for Human Genetics, University Hospitals Leuven, O&N I Herestraat 49 - box 602, KU Leuven, 3000 Leuven, Belgium
| | - Karen Peeraer
- University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven University Fertility Center, Herestraat 49, 3000 Leuven, Belgium
| | - Christel Meuleman
- University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven University Fertility Center, Herestraat 49, 3000 Leuven, Belgium
| | - Joris Robert Vermeesch
- Department of Human Genetics, Centre for Human Genetics, University Hospitals Leuven, O&N I Herestraat 49 - box 602, KU Leuven, 3000 Leuven, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Peeraer K, D'Hooghe TM, Vandoren C, Trybou J, Spiessens C, Debrock S, De Neubourg D. A 50% reduction in multiple live birth rate is associated with a 13% cost saving: a real-life retrospective cost analysis. Reprod Biomed Online 2017. [PMID: 28629925 DOI: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2017.05.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
Belgian legislation limiting the number of embryos for transfer has been shown to result in a 50% reduction of the multiple live birth rate (MLBR) per cycle without having a negative impact on the cumulative delivery rate per patient within six cycles or 36 months. The objective of the current study was to evaluate the cost saving associated with a 50% reduction in MLBR. A retrospective cost analysis was performed of 213 couples, who became pregnant and had a live birth after one or more assisted reproductive technology treatment cycles, and their 254 children. The mean cost of a singleton (n = 172) and multiple (n = 41) birth was calculated based on individual hospital invoices. The cost analysis showed a significantly higher total cost (assisted reproductive technology treatment, pregnancy follow-up, delivery, child cost until the age of 2 years) for multiple births (both children: mean €43,397) than for singleton births (mean: €17,866) (Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney P < 0.0001). A 50% reduction in MLBR resulted in a significant cost reduction related to hospital care of 13%.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Karen Peeraer
- Leuven University Fertility Center, UZ Leuven Campus Gasthuisberg, Leuven 3000, Belgium.
| | - Thomas M D'Hooghe
- Leuven University Fertility Center, UZ Leuven Campus Gasthuisberg, Leuven 3000, Belgium
| | - Cindy Vandoren
- Department of Management Information and Reporting, UZ Leuven Campus Gasthuisberg, Leuven 3000, Belgium
| | - Jeroen Trybou
- Department of Public Health, Ghent University, De Pintelaan 183, Ghent 9000, Belgium
| | - Carl Spiessens
- Leuven University Fertility Center, UZ Leuven Campus Gasthuisberg, Leuven 3000, Belgium
| | - Sophie Debrock
- Leuven University Fertility Center, UZ Leuven Campus Gasthuisberg, Leuven 3000, Belgium
| | - Diane De Neubourg
- Leuven University Fertility Center, UZ Leuven Campus Gasthuisberg, Leuven 3000, Belgium; Center for Reproductive Medicine, Antwerp University Hospital, Edegem 2650, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
O DF, Waelkens E, Peterse DP, Lebovic D, Meuleman C, Tomassetti C, Peeraer K, Alvarez Real A, Bosseloir A, D'Hooghe T, Fassbender A. Evaluation of Total, Active, and Specific Myeloperoxidase Levels in Women with and without Endometriosis. Gynecol Obstet Invest 2017; 83:133-139. [DOI: 10.1159/000475664] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/28/2016] [Accepted: 04/10/2017] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
|
40
|
Chen F, Spiessens C, D'Hooghe T, Peeraer K, Carpentier S. Follicular fluid biomarkers for human in vitro fertilization outcome: Proof of principle. Proteome Sci 2016; 14:17. [PMID: 27895531 PMCID: PMC5109724 DOI: 10.1186/s12953-016-0106-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/14/2016] [Accepted: 11/01/2016] [Indexed: 01/24/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Human follicular fluid (FF) is a unique biological fluid in which the oocyte develops in vivo, and presents an optimal source for non-invasive biochemical predictors. Oocyte quality directly influences the embryo development and hence, may be used as a predictor of embryo quality. Peptide profiling of FF and its potential use as a biomarker for oocyte quality has never been reported. Methods This study screened FF for peptide biomarkers that predict the outcome of in vitro fertilization (IVF). Potential biomarkers were discovered by investigating 2 training datasets, consisting both of 17 samples and validating on an independent experiment containing 32 samples. Peptide profiles were acquired by nano-scale liquid chromatography coupled to tandem mass spectrometry (nano LC-MS/MS). Results From the training datasets 53 peptides were found as potential biomarker candidates, predicting the fertilization outcome of 24 out of the 32 validation samples blindly (81.3% sensitivity, 68.8% specificity, AUC = 0.86). Seven potential biomarker peptides were identified. They were derived from: insulin-like growth factor binding protein-5, alpha-2-antiplasmin, complement component 3, inter-alpha-trypsin inhibitor heavy chain H1, serum albumin, protein diaphanous homolog 1 and plastin-3. Conclusions The MS-based comprehensive peptidomic approach carried out in this study, established a novel panel of potential biomarkers that present a promising predictive accuracy rate in fertilization outcome, and indicates FF as an interesting biomarker resource to improve IVF clinic routine. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12953-016-0106-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fang Chen
- Leuven University Fertility Centre, UZ Leuven Campus Gasthuisberg, Herestraat 49, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Carl Spiessens
- Leuven University Fertility Centre, UZ Leuven Campus Gasthuisberg, Herestraat 49, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Thomas D'Hooghe
- Leuven University Fertility Centre, UZ Leuven Campus Gasthuisberg, Herestraat 49, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Karen Peeraer
- Leuven University Fertility Centre, UZ Leuven Campus Gasthuisberg, Herestraat 49, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Sebastien Carpentier
- Facility for Systems Biology based Mass Spectrometry (SYBIOMA), KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
O DF, Roskams T, Van den Eynde K, Vanhie A, Peterse DP, Meuleman C, Tomassetti C, Peeraer K, D'Hooghe TM, Fassbender A. The Presence of Endometrial Cells in Peritoneal Fluid of Women With and Without Endometriosis. Reprod Sci 2016; 24:242-251. [PMID: 27324432 DOI: 10.1177/1933719116653677] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
To reinforce Sampson's theory of retrograde menstruation in the pathogenesis of endometriosis, proof should be provided that during menstruation endometrial cells are present in peritoneal fluid (PF). We hypothesize that the prevalence of PF samples containing endometrial cells is higher in patients with endometriosis than in controls without endometriosis during menstruation. We selected from our biobank PF samples of 17 reproductive-age women with (n = 9) or without (n = 8) endometriosis who had received a diagnostic laparoscopy for investigation of pain/infertility. Peritoneal fluid had been collected during laparoscopy in the menstrual phase of the cycle, centrifuged, and the resulting pellet was stored at -80°C. About 5-μm sections of frozen PF pellets were stained using the Dako Envision Flex system with primary antibodies against epithelial cell adhesion molecule (Ep-CAM; endometrial epithelial cells), CD10 (endometrial stromal cells), prekeratin (epithelial/mesothelial cells), vimentin (endometrial/mesothelial/immune cells), calretinin (mesothelial cells), and CD68 (macrophages). The PF cells positive for Ep-CAM were detected in 5 of 9 patients with endometriosis and 6 of 8 controls ( P = .62). CD10 stained positively in 6 of the 9 patients with endometriosis and 3 of the 8 controls ( P = .35). Calretinin and prekeratin staining showed the presence of mesothelial cells in all pellets. Vimentin stained approximately 100% of the PF cells. CD68+ macrophages represented >50% of cells in all pellets. The prevalence of PF samples containing endometrial epithelial and stromal cells was not higher in patients with endometriosis than in controls without endometriosis during menstruation. Our findings question the relevance of endometrial cells in PF for the pathogenesis of endometriosis and support the importance of other mechanisms such as immune dysfunction and/or endometrial stem cells.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dorien F O
- 1 Department of Development and Regeneration, Organ systems, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.,2 Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Leuven University Fertility Centre, University Hospital Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Tania Roskams
- 3 Department of Imaging and Pathology, KU Leuven and University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Kathleen Van den Eynde
- 3 Department of Imaging and Pathology, KU Leuven and University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Arne Vanhie
- 1 Department of Development and Regeneration, Organ systems, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.,2 Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Leuven University Fertility Centre, University Hospital Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Daniëlle P Peterse
- 1 Department of Development and Regeneration, Organ systems, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.,2 Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Leuven University Fertility Centre, University Hospital Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Christel Meuleman
- 2 Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Leuven University Fertility Centre, University Hospital Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Carla Tomassetti
- 2 Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Leuven University Fertility Centre, University Hospital Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Karen Peeraer
- 2 Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Leuven University Fertility Centre, University Hospital Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Thomas M D'Hooghe
- 1 Department of Development and Regeneration, Organ systems, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Amelie Fassbender
- 1 Department of Development and Regeneration, Organ systems, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.,2 Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Leuven University Fertility Centre, University Hospital Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Chen F, De Neubourg D, Debrock S, Peeraer K, D'Hooghe T, Spiessens C. Selecting the embryo with the highest implantation potential using a data mining based prediction model. Reprod Biol Endocrinol 2016; 14:10. [PMID: 26936606 PMCID: PMC4776393 DOI: 10.1186/s12958-016-0145-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/07/2015] [Accepted: 02/26/2016] [Indexed: 12/28/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Embryo selection has been based on developmental and morphological characteristics. However, the presence of an important intra-and inter-observer variability of standard scoring system (SSS) has been reported. A computer-assisted scoring system (CASS) has the potential to overcome most of these disadvantages associated with the SSS. The aims of this study were to construct a prediction model, with data mining approaches, and compare the predictive performance of models in SSS and CASS and to evaluate whether using the prediction model would impact the selection of the embryo for transfer. METHODS A total of 871 single transferred embryos between 2008 and 2013 were included and evaluated with two scoring systems: SSS and CASS. Prediction models were developed using multivariable logistic regression (LR) and multivariate adaptive regression splines (MARS). The prediction models were externally validated with a test set of 109 single transfers between January and June 2014. Area under the curve (AUC) in training data and validation data was compared to determine the utility of the models. RESULTS In SSS models, the AUC declined significantly from training data to validation data (p < 0.05). No significant difference was detected in CASS derived models. Two final prediction models derived from CASS were obtained using LR and MARS, which showed moderate discriminative capacity (c-statistic 0.64 and 0.69 respectively) on validation data. CONCLUSIONS The study showed that the introduction of CASS improved the generalizability of the prediction models, and the combination of computer-assisted scoring system with data mining based predictive modeling is a promising approach to improve the selection of embryo with the highest implantation potential.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fang Chen
- Leuven University Fertility Centre, UZ Leuven Campus Gasthuisberg, Herestraat 49, Leuven, Belgium.
| | | | - Sophie Debrock
- Leuven University Fertility Centre, UZ Leuven Campus Gasthuisberg, Herestraat 49, Leuven, Belgium.
| | - Karen Peeraer
- Leuven University Fertility Centre, UZ Leuven Campus Gasthuisberg, Herestraat 49, Leuven, Belgium.
| | - Thomas D'Hooghe
- Leuven University Fertility Centre, UZ Leuven Campus Gasthuisberg, Herestraat 49, Leuven, Belgium.
| | - Carl Spiessens
- Leuven University Fertility Centre, UZ Leuven Campus Gasthuisberg, Herestraat 49, Leuven, Belgium.
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Vodolazkaia A, Yesilyurt BT, Kyama CM, Bokor A, Schols D, Huskens D, Meuleman C, Peeraer K, Tomassetti C, Bossuyt X, Lambrechts D, D'Hooghe T, Fassbender A. Vascular endothelial growth factor pathway in endometriosis: genetic variants and plasma biomarkers. Fertil Steril 2016; 105:988-96. [PMID: 26773192 DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2015.12.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/15/2015] [Revised: 12/07/2015] [Accepted: 12/16/2015] [Indexed: 01/20/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To study single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) involved in angiogenesis (VEGF, PLGF, VEGFR1, VEGFR2, HIF-1α) and plasma levels of the corresponding proteins (VEGF, PLGF, sVEGFR1, sVEGFR2) in women with and without endometriosis. DESIGN Allele frequencies of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) pathway SNPs and plasma levels of the corresponding proteins were investigated in patients with endometriosis and in controls. SETTING University hospital. PATIENT(S) Samples of DNA from 1,931 Caucasian patients were included (1,109 patients with endometriosis and 822 controls). An additional study group included 973 DNA samples from volunteers, self-reported to be healthy without laparoscopic evaluation. INTERVENTION(S) Women who underwent a laparoscopy for subfertility and/or pain and healthy volunteers without laparoscopic evaluation. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S) Functional SNPs of the VEGF, VEGFR1, VEGFR2, HIF-1α genes and Hap Map tagging SNPs of the PLGF gene were genotyped by using iPLEX technology on a Sequenom MassArray and TaqMan SNP Genotyping Assay. The VEGF levels were determined in ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid plasma samples by using Bio-Plex Protein Array System. PLGF, sVEGFR1, and sVEGFR2 levels were measured in ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid plasma samples by using ELISA Quantikine kits. RESULT(S) A significant association was found between the rs2268613 polymorphism in the PLGF gene and PLGF plasma levels. In all study subjects, women with the AA variant of the rs2268613 PLGF gene had significantly lower PLGF plasma levels (median [interquartile range] 9.36 [8.19-10.43] pg/mL) than those with the AG variant (12.1 [11.81-20.84] pg/mL; P(a)=.0085, P(b)=.04), both before and after multiple testing. Plasma levels of VEGF were elevated in endometriosis patients (especially in minimal-mild endometriosis during the menstrual cycle phase) compared with laparoscopic controls but had a moderate diagnostic performance (area under the curve, 0.73) in this discovery dataset. At a cut-off plasma level of VEGF >3.88 pg/mL, minimal-mild stages of endometriosis were diagnosed with a sensitivity of 74% and a specificity of 80% during the menstrual phase of cycle. The associations between the presence of endometriosis and SNPs in PLGF (rs2268614), HIF-1α (rs11549465), and VEGFR1 (rs9582036) genes lost statistical significance after multiple testing. CONCLUSION(S) Genetic variants in the PLGF rs2268613 gene may influence plasma levels of the corresponding protein. Plasma levels of VEGF were elevated in endometriosis patients compared with controls. The associations between the presence of endometriosis and SNPs in PLGF (rs2268614), HIF-1α (rs11549465), and VEGFR1 (rs9582036) genes lost statistical significance after multiple testing.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexandra Vodolazkaia
- Department of Laboratory Medicine, University Hospital Gasthuisberg, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Betul Tuba Yesilyurt
- Vesalius Research Centrum, VIB, Leuven, Belgium; Vesalius Research Center, Department of Oncology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Cleophas Mutinda Kyama
- Department of Medical Lab Sciences, Institute of Tropical Medicine and Infectious Diseases, Jomo Kenyatta University of Agriculture and Technology, Nairobi, Kenya
| | - Attila Bokor
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Semmelweis University of Medicine, Budapest, Hungary
| | | | - Dana Huskens
- Rega Institute for Medical Research, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Christel Meuleman
- Leuven University Fertility Center, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital Gasthuisberg, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Karen Peeraer
- Leuven University Fertility Center, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital Gasthuisberg, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Carla Tomassetti
- Leuven University Fertility Center, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital Gasthuisberg, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Xavier Bossuyt
- Department of Laboratory Medicine, University Hospital Gasthuisberg, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Diether Lambrechts
- Vesalius Research Centrum, VIB, Leuven, Belgium; Vesalius Research Center, Department of Oncology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Thomas D'Hooghe
- Leuven University Fertility Center, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital Gasthuisberg, Leuven, Belgium; Experimental Gynecology Laboratory, Department of Development and Regeneration, Organ System, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; Division of Reproductive Biology, Institute of Primate Research, Nairobi, Kenya
| | - Amelie Fassbender
- Experimental Gynecology Laboratory, Department of Development and Regeneration, Organ System, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Vanhie A, Tomassetti C, Peeraer K, Meuleman C, D'Hooghe T. Challenges in the development of novel therapeutic strategies for treatment of endometriosis. Expert Opin Ther Targets 2015; 20:593-600. [PMID: 26558646 DOI: 10.1517/14728222.2016.1118461] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/05/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Endometriosis is an estrogen-dependent disease that results in pelvic pain and infertility. Its treatment is often frustrating due to limited medical treatment options, complex surgical treatment and high recurrence rates. Despite the advances in our understanding of the pathogenesis over the last decades and the consequent novel therapeutic strategies, no new drugs have been introduced in daily clinical practice. AREAS COVERED In the first part we present an overview of the pathogenesis of endometriosis. In the second part we discuss how new insights have led to the development of novel nonhormonal strategies for the treatment of endometriosis, focusing on anti-inflammatory and anti-angiogenic agents. In the third part we describe the problems encountered in the translation from experimental drugs to routine medicine for the treatment of endometriosis. EXPERT OPINION Despite the multitude of agents that have been tested in preclinical trials, only few drugs have passed to the stage of clinical testing and none have been introduced into clinical practice. It is our opinion that the major challenges in the translation from novel agents for endometriosis is due to the use of inadequate rodent models and a lack of standardization in the design and reporting of preclinical endometriosis models.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Arne Vanhie
- a Leuven University Endometriosis Center of Expertise, Leuven University Fertility Center, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology , UZ Gasthuisberg , Leuven , Belgium
| | - Carla Tomassetti
- a Leuven University Endometriosis Center of Expertise, Leuven University Fertility Center, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology , UZ Gasthuisberg , Leuven , Belgium
| | - Karen Peeraer
- a Leuven University Endometriosis Center of Expertise, Leuven University Fertility Center, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology , UZ Gasthuisberg , Leuven , Belgium
| | - Christel Meuleman
- a Leuven University Endometriosis Center of Expertise, Leuven University Fertility Center, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology , UZ Gasthuisberg , Leuven , Belgium.,b Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Faculty of Medicine , Leuven University , Leuven , Belgium
| | - Thomas D'Hooghe
- b Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Faculty of Medicine , Leuven University , Leuven , Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Chen F, Debrock S, Peeraer K, D'hooghe T, Spiessens C. Selecting the embryo with the highest implantation potential using developmental and morphometric scoring. Arch Public Health 2015. [PMCID: PMC4582409 DOI: 10.1186/2049-3258-73-s1-p48] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
|
46
|
Peeraer K, Couck I, Debrock S, De Neubourg D, De Loecker P, Tomassetti C, Laenen A, Welkenhuysen M, Meeuwis L, Pelckmans S, Meuleman C, D'Hooghe T. Frozen-thawed embryo transfer in a natural or mildly hormonally stimulated cycle in women with regular ovulatory cycles: a RCT. Hum Reprod 2015; 30:2552-62. [PMID: 26364081 DOI: 10.1093/humrep/dev224] [Citation(s) in RCA: 39] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/11/2015] [Accepted: 08/10/2015] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Abstract
STUDY QUESTION Can ovarian stimulation with low dose hMG improve the implantation rate (IR) per frozen-thawed embryo transferred (FET) when compared with natural cycle in an FET programme in women with a regular ovulatory cycle? SUMMARY ANSWER Both IR and live birth rate (LBR) per FET were similar in the group with mild ovarian stimulation and the natural cycle group. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY Different cycle regimens for endometrial preparation are used prior to FET: spontaneous ovulatory cycles, cycles with artificial endometrial preparation using estrogen and progesterone hormones, and cycles stimulated with gonadotrophins or clomiphene citrate. At present, it is not clear which regimen results in the highest IR or LBR. More specifically, there are no RCTs in ovulatory women comparing reproductive outcome after FET during a natural cycle and during a hormonally stimulated cycle. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION A total of 410 women scheduled for FET during 579 cycles (December 2003-September 2013) were enrolled in an open-label RCT to natural cycle (NC FET group, n = 291) or to a cycle hormonally stimulated with s.c. gonadotrophins (hMG FET group, 37.5-75 IU per day, n = 288). A total of 672 embryos were transferred during 434 cycles (332 embryos and 213 cycles in the NC FET group; 340 embryos and 221 cycles in the hMG FET group). Assuming a = 0.05 and 80% power, it was calculated that 219 frozen-thawed embryos were required for transfer in each group to demonstrate a difference of 10% in IR. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS Women were eligible according to the following inclusion criteria: regular ovulatory cycle, female age ≥21 years and ≤45 years, informed consent. FET cycles with preimplantation genetic screening were excluded. The primary outcome was IR per embryo transferred. Secondary outcomes included IR with fetal heart beat (FHB), LBR per embryo transferred and endometrial thickness on the day of hCG administration. Statistical analysis was by intention to treat and controlled for the presence of multiple measures, as eligible women could be randomized in more than one cycle. Chi-square and independent t-test were used to compare categorical and continuous variables. The relative risk (RR) was estimated using a Poisson model with log link. Hierarchical models with random intercepts for patient and cycle were considered to account for clustering of cycles within patients and of embryos within cycles. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE The primary outcome, IR per embryo transferred, was not statistically different between the NC FET group (41/332 (12.35%)) and in the hMG FET group (55/340 (16.18%)) (RR 1.3 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.9-2.0), P = 0.19). Similarly, the secondary outcome, IR with FHB per embryo transferred, was 34/332 (10.24%) in the NC FET group and 48/340 (14.12%) in the hMG FET group (RR 1.4 (95% CI 0.9-2.1), P = 0.15). The LBR per embryo transferred was 32/332 (9.64%) in the NC FET group and 45/340 (13.24%) in the hMG FET group (RR 1.4 (95% CI 0.9-2.2), P = 0.17). Endometrial thickness was also similar in both groups [8.9 (95% CI 8.7-9.1) in the NC FET group and 8.9 (95% CI 8.7-9.1) in the hMG FET group]. The duration of the follicular phase was significantly shorter (P < 0.001) in the hMG FET group [13.7 days (95% CI 13.2-14.2)] than in the NC FET group [15.4 days (95% CI 14.8-15.9)]. LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION Randomization of cycles instead of patients; open-label design; relatively long period of recruitment. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS Our observation that the IR per embryo transferred is not significantly increased after FET during natural or gonadotrophin stimulated cycle, suggests that the effect of mild hormonal stimulation with gonadotrophins is smaller than what was considered clinically relevant with respect to reproductive outcome after FET. These data suggest that endometrial receptivity is not relevantly improved, but also not impaired after hormonal stimulation with gonadotrophins. Since FET during a natural cycle is cheaper and more patient-friendly, we recommend this regimen as the treatment of choice for women with regular cycles undergoing FET. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER clinicaltrials.gov NCT00492934. TRIAL REGISTRATION DATE 26 June 2007. DATE OF FIRST PATIENT'S ENROLMENT 1 December 2003.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Karen Peeraer
- Leuven University Fertility Center, UZ Leuven Campus Gasthuisberg, 3000 Leuven, Belgium
| | - Isabelle Couck
- Leuven University Fertility Center, UZ Leuven Campus Gasthuisberg, 3000 Leuven, Belgium
| | - Sophie Debrock
- Leuven University Fertility Center, UZ Leuven Campus Gasthuisberg, 3000 Leuven, Belgium
| | - Diane De Neubourg
- Leuven University Fertility Center, UZ Leuven Campus Gasthuisberg, 3000 Leuven, Belgium
| | - Peter De Loecker
- Leuven University Fertility Center, UZ Leuven Campus Gasthuisberg, 3000 Leuven, Belgium
| | - Carla Tomassetti
- Leuven University Fertility Center, UZ Leuven Campus Gasthuisberg, 3000 Leuven, Belgium
| | - Annouschka Laenen
- Leuven Biostatistics and Statistical Bioinformatics Centre, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Myriam Welkenhuysen
- Leuven University Fertility Center, UZ Leuven Campus Gasthuisberg, 3000 Leuven, Belgium
| | - Luc Meeuwis
- Leuven University Fertility Center, UZ Leuven Campus Gasthuisberg, 3000 Leuven, Belgium
| | - Sofie Pelckmans
- Leuven University Fertility Center, UZ Leuven Campus Gasthuisberg, 3000 Leuven, Belgium
| | - Christel Meuleman
- Leuven University Fertility Center, UZ Leuven Campus Gasthuisberg, 3000 Leuven, Belgium
| | - Thomas D'Hooghe
- Leuven University Fertility Center, UZ Leuven Campus Gasthuisberg, 3000 Leuven, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Fassbender A, Debiec-Rychter M, Van Bree R, Vermeesch JR, Meuleman C, Tomassetti C, Peeraer K, D'Hooghe T, Lebovic DI. Lack of Evidence That Male Fetal Microchimerism is Present in Endometriosis. Reprod Sci 2015; 22:1115-21. [PMID: 25749809 PMCID: PMC5933168 DOI: 10.1177/1933719115574343] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/12/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Fetal microchimerism has been implicated in the etiology of autoimmune diseases. This study was done to test the hypothesis that male fetal microchimerism is present in eutopic and ectopic endometrium (EM) obtained from women with endometriosis but not in eutopic EM from women without endometriosis. METHODS A total of 31 patients were selected, including women with endometriosis (paired eutopic and ectopic EM; n = 19) and women without endometriosis (eutopic EM; n = 12). Tricolor interphase fluorescence in situ hybridization analysis was performed by cohybridization of CEP Y SpectrumAqua and CEP X SpectrumGreen (SG)/CEP Y SpectrumOrange probes. RESULTS Ectopic EM from women with endometriosis had 75% XX chromosomes (double SG signals) and 25% X chromosomes (single SG signal). Y chromosomes were not observed in any of the eutopic/ectopic endometrial tissues from cases or controls. CONCLUSIONS We were unable to confirm our hypothesis that male fetal microchimerism is present in eutopic and/or ectopic EM obtained from women with endometriosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amelie Fassbender
- KULeuven, Department of Development and Regeneration, Organ systems, Leuven, Belgium Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Leuven University Fertility Centre, University Hospital Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Maria Debiec-Rychter
- Department of Human Genetics, KU Leuven and University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Rieta Van Bree
- KULeuven, Department of Development and Regeneration, Organ systems, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Joris Robert Vermeesch
- Department of Human Genetics, KU Leuven and University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Christel Meuleman
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Leuven University Fertility Centre, University Hospital Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Carla Tomassetti
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Leuven University Fertility Centre, University Hospital Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Karen Peeraer
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Leuven University Fertility Centre, University Hospital Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Thomas D'Hooghe
- KULeuven, Department of Development and Regeneration, Organ systems, Leuven, Belgium Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Leuven University Fertility Centre, University Hospital Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Dan I Lebovic
- Reproductive Endocrinology & Infertility, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI, USA
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Neyens S, De Neubourg D, Peeraer K, De Jaegher N, Spiessens C, Debrock S, De Loecker P, D'Hooghe TM. Is There a Correlation between the Number of Follicular Flushings, Oocyte/Embryo Quality and Pregnancy Rate in Assisted Reproductive Technology Cycles? Results from a Prospective Study. Gynecol Obstet Invest 2015; 81:34-40. [DOI: 10.1159/000434750] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/05/2015] [Accepted: 06/02/2015] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
|
49
|
Debrock S, Peeraer K, Fernandez Gallardo E, De Neubourg D, Spiessens C, D'Hooghe TM. Vitrification of cleavage stage day 3 embryos results in higher live birth rates than conventional slow freezing: a RCT. Hum Reprod 2015; 30:1820-30. [PMID: 26089301 DOI: 10.1093/humrep/dev134] [Citation(s) in RCA: 50] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/21/2015] [Accepted: 05/19/2015] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Abstract
STUDY QUESTION Is the live birth rate (LBR) per embryo thawed/warmed higher when Day 3 cleavage stage embryos are cryopreserved by vitrification compared with slow freezing? SUMMARY ANSWER The LBR per embryo thawed/warmed was higher after vitrification than after slow freezing on Day 3, based on better embryo survival, quality and availability of embryos in the vitrification group. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY Post-thawing survival rate of cleavage-stage embryos has been reported to be higher after vitrification than after slow freezing. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION This RCT was performed in an academic tertiary center between September 2011 and March 2013. If supernumerary embryos were available on Day 3, patients were randomized at the time of cryopreservation using a computerized system to determine a simple allocation to the vitrification group or the slow freezing group and all embryos were frozen with the same technique. The primary outcome of this study was the LBR per embryo thawed/warmed. Power calculation revealed that 184 thawed embryos were needed in each group (β = 0.8, α < 0.05) to test the hypothesis that the LBR per embryo thawed/warmed was significantly higher (16%) after vitrification than after slow freezing (6%). PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS Patients <40 years old undergoing their first oocyte retrieval (OR), with embryo transfer and with supernumerary embryos on Day 3, were randomized. Day 3 embryos with ≥6 cells, <25% fragmentation and morphologically equal blastomeres were cryopreserved by slow freezing (using 1,2-propanediol and 0.1 M sucrose as cryoprotectant) or by closed vitrification using commercially available freezing/vitrification media. Survival was defined as ≥50% cells were intact after thawing. Thawed embryos were further cultured overnight. In total, 307 patients were randomized to slow freezing (155 patients, 480 embryos) or vitrification (152 patients, 495 embryos). MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE By March 2013, 200 embryos were thawed after slow freezing in 95 cycles for 79 patients and 217 embryos were warmed after vitrification in 121 cycles in 90 patients. The LBR per embryo thawed/warmed was significantly higher after vitrification (16.1% (35/217)) than after slow freezing (5.0% (10/200); P < 0.0022; relative risk (RR) 3.23; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.64-6.35). Similarly, the implantation rate per embryo thawed/warmed was higher after vitrification (20.7% (45/217) than after slow freezing (7.5% (15/200); P = 0.0012; RR 2.76; CI 1.59-4.81). The survival rate was significantly higher after vitrification (84.3% (183/217) than after slow freezing (52.5% (105/200); P < 0.0001). Significantly more embryos were fully intact after vitrification (75.4% (138/183) than after slow freezing (28.6% (30/105); P < 0.0001). The number of transfers was significantly higher after vitrification (90.1% (109/121)) than after slow freezing (73.7% (70/95); P = 0.0024). LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION Survival rates in the slow freezing group were low in this study. Additional RCTs are needed to compare reproductive outcome after vitrification and after slow freezing with 1,2-propanediol and 0.2 M sucrose, since this method has been reported to have better survival than the method used in our study. Our findings are only applicable to the specific slow freezing cryopreservation medium used in our study, and not to any other commercially available media. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS When compared with slow freezing using 1,2-propanediol and 0.1 M sucrose as cryoprotectant, vitrification of Day 3 cleavage stage embryos resulted in a higher LBR per embryo warmed, and may therefore result into a higher cumulative delivery rate after one oocyte retrieval. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTERESTS None. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER NCT02013024.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S Debrock
- KULeuven - University of Leuven, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven University Fertility Center, B-3000 Leuven, Belgium
| | - K Peeraer
- KULeuven - University of Leuven, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven University Fertility Center, B-3000 Leuven, Belgium
| | - E Fernandez Gallardo
- KULeuven - University of Leuven, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven University Fertility Center, B-3000 Leuven, Belgium
| | - D De Neubourg
- KULeuven - University of Leuven, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven University Fertility Center, B-3000 Leuven, Belgium
| | - C Spiessens
- KULeuven - University of Leuven, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven University Fertility Center, B-3000 Leuven, Belgium
| | - T M D'Hooghe
- KULeuven - University of Leuven, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven University Fertility Center, B-3000 Leuven, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
De Clercq K, Held K, Van Bree R, Meuleman C, Peeraer K, Tomassetti C, Voets T, D'Hooghe T, Vriens J. Functional expression of transient receptor potential channels in human endometrial stromal cells during the luteal phase of the menstrual cycle. Hum Reprod 2015; 30:1421-36. [PMID: 25820697 DOI: 10.1093/humrep/dev068] [Citation(s) in RCA: 33] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/19/2014] [Accepted: 03/05/2015] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Abstract
STUDY QUESTION Are members of the transient receptor potential (TRP) channel superfamily functionally expressed in the human endometrial stroma? SUMMARY ANSWER The Ca(2+)-permeable ion channels TRPV2, TRPV4, TRPC6 and TRPM7 are functionally expressed in primary endometrial stromal cells. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY Intercellular communication between epithelial and stromal endometrial cells is required to initiate decidualization, a prerequisite for successful implantation. TRP channels are possible candidates as signal transducers involved in cell-cell communication, but no fingerprint is available of the functional distribution of TRP channels in the human endometrium during the luteal phase of the menstrual cycle. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION Endometrial biopsy samples (previously frozen) from patients of reproductive age with regular menstrual cycles, who were undergoing diagnostic laparoscopic surgery for pain and/or infertility, were analysed. Samples were obtained from the menstrual (Days 1-5, n = 3), follicular (Days 6-14, n = 6), early luteal (Days 15-20, n = 5) and late luteal (Days 21-28, n = 5) phases. In addition, a total of 13 patient samples taken during the luteal phase were used to set up primary cell cultures for further experiments. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS Quantitative real-time PCR (qRT-PCR), immunocytochemistry, Fura2-based Ca(2+)-microfluorimetry and whole-cell patch clamp experiments were performed to study the functional expression pattern of TRP channels. Specific pharmacological agents, such as Δ(9)-tetrahydrocannabinol, GSK1016790A and 1-oleoyl-2-acetyl-glycerol, were used to functionally assess the expression of TRPV2, TRPV4 and TRPC6, respectively. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE Expression of TRPV2, TRPV4, TRPC1, TRPC4, TRPC6, TRPM4 and TRPM7 was detected at the mRNA level in endometrial biopsies (n = 19) and in primary endometrial stromal cell cultures obtained from patients during the luteal phase (n = 5) of the menstrual cycle. Messenger RNA levels of TRPV2, TRPC4 and TRPC6 were significantly increased (P < 0.01) in the late luteal phase compared with the early luteal phase. Immunocytochemistry experiments showed a positive staining for TRPV2, TRPV4, TRPC6 and TRPM7 in the plasma membrane and in the cytoplasm of primary endometrial stromal cells. Ca(2+)-microfluorimetry revealed significant increases (P < 0.001) in intracellular Ca(2+) levels when stromal cells were incubated with specific activators of TRPV2, TRPV4 and TRPC6. Further functional characterization was performed using whole-cell patch clamp experiments. Taken together, these data provide evidence for the functional activity of TRPV2, TRPV4, TRPC6 and TRPM7 channels in primary stromal cell cultures. LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION Although mRNA levels are detected for TRPV6, TRPC1, TRPC4 and TRPM4, the limited supply of specific antibodies and lack of selective pharmacological agents restricted any additional analysis of these ion channels. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS Embryo implantation is a dynamic developmental process that integrates many signalling molecules into a precisely orchestrated programme. Our findings identified certain members of the TRP superfamily as candidate sensors in the epithelial-stromal crosstalk. These results are very helpful to unravel the signalling cascade required for successful embryo implantation. In addition, this knowledge could lead to new strategies to correct implantation failure and facilitate the development of novel non-hormonal contraceptives. STUDY FUNDING/ COMPETING INTERESTS This work was supported by grants from the Research Foundation-Flanders (G.0856.13N to J.V.), the Research Council of the KU Leuven (OT/13/113 to J.V. and T.D. and PF-TRPLe to T.V.) and by the Planckaert-De Waele fund (to J.V.). K.D.C. and K.H. are funded by the FWO Belgium. None of the authors have a conflict of interest.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katrien De Clercq
- Laboratory of Obstetrics and Experimental Gynaecology, KU Leuven, Herestraat 49 box 611, B-3000 Leuven, Belgium
| | - Katharina Held
- Laboratory of Obstetrics and Experimental Gynaecology, KU Leuven, Herestraat 49 box 611, B-3000 Leuven, Belgium Laboratory of Ion Channel Research and TRP Research Platform Leuven (TRPLe), KU Leuven, Herestraat 49 box 802, B-3000 Leuven, Belgium
| | - Rieta Van Bree
- Laboratory of Obstetrics and Experimental Gynaecology, KU Leuven, Herestraat 49 box 611, B-3000 Leuven, Belgium
| | - Christel Meuleman
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Leuven University Fertility Centre, University Hospital Gasthuisberg, B-3000 Leuven, Belgium
| | - Karen Peeraer
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Leuven University Fertility Centre, University Hospital Gasthuisberg, B-3000 Leuven, Belgium
| | - Carla Tomassetti
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Leuven University Fertility Centre, University Hospital Gasthuisberg, B-3000 Leuven, Belgium
| | - Thomas Voets
- Laboratory of Ion Channel Research and TRP Research Platform Leuven (TRPLe), KU Leuven, Herestraat 49 box 802, B-3000 Leuven, Belgium
| | - Thomas D'Hooghe
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Leuven University Fertility Centre, University Hospital Gasthuisberg, B-3000 Leuven, Belgium
| | - Joris Vriens
- Laboratory of Obstetrics and Experimental Gynaecology, KU Leuven, Herestraat 49 box 611, B-3000 Leuven, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|