A comprehensive women's health care center: are gynecologists offering primary care?

Timeliness of diagnostic evaluation for postmenopausal bleeding: A retrospective cohort study using claims data

BACKGROUND

Postmenopausal bleeding (PMB) is a common gynecologic condition. Although it can be a sign of uterine cancer, most patients have benign etiology. However, research on quality of diagnostic evaluation for PMB has been limited to cancer patients. To extend this research, we examined the timeliness of diagnostic evaluation for PMB among patients with benign conditions.

METHODS

Using the 2008-2019 MarketScan Research Databases, we identified 499176 patients (456741 with commercial insurance and 42435 with Medicaid insurance) who presented with PMB but did not have gynecologic cancer. For each patient, we measured the time from their PMB reporting to the date of their first diagnostic procedure. The association between patient characteristics and time to first diagnostic procedure was examined using Cox proportional hazards models (for the overall sample and then stratified by insurance type).

RESULTS

Overall, 54.3% of patients received a diagnostic procedure on the same day when they reported PMB and 86.6% received a diagnostic procedure within 12 months after reporting PMB. These percentages were 39.4% and 77.1%, respectively, for Medicaid patients, compared to 55.7% and 87.4%, respectively, for commercially insured patients (p<0.001 for both). Medicaid patients had an 18% lower rate of receiving a diagnostic procedure at any given time point than commercially insured patients (adjusted hazard ratio = 0.82, 95% CI: 0.81-0.83). Meanwhile, older age and non-gynecologic comorbidities were associated with a lower rate whereas concomitant gynecologic conditions and recent use of preventive care were associated with a higher rate of receiving diagnostic procedures. Analysis stratified by insurance type identified additional risk factors for delayed diagnostic procedures (e.g., non-metropolitan versus metropolitan location for commercially insured patients and Black versus White race for Medicaid patients).

CONCLUSION

A sizable proportion of patients did not receive prompt diagnostic evaluation for PMB. Both clinical and non-clinical factors could affect timeliness of evaluation.

An Expanded Primary Care-Based Women's Health Clinic to Improve Resident Education and Patient Care in Resident Continuity Clinic

BACKGROUND

Internal medicine (IM) residents are underprepared in women's health. Lack of properly trained faculty and clinic culture limits the ability to provide bedside teaching.

AIM

Assess the impact of a primary care-based, women's clinic on residents' quality of care for females.

SETTING

Large academic, urban primary care clinic with resident and faculty practices PARTICIPANTS: PGY-2 IM and Med-Peds (MP) residents PROGRAM DESCRIPTION: A weekly half-day, women's clinic to provide expanded women's healthcare to primary care group patients. Residents rotate through the clinic to receive bedside teaching.

PROGRAM EVALUATION

Chart review was performed for a representative sample of reproductive-aged women seen in primary care before and after the establishment of the women's clinic. A total of 666 charts were reviewed (314 pre, 352 post). Improvement was seen in residents' rate of sexual histories (54% vs 75%, p< 0.01) with a significant decrease in women not asked about contraception (15% vs 3%, p<0.01). Overall there was a decrease in gynecology referrals (18 to 11%, p=0.02).

DISCUSSION

After implementing the women's health clinic, more women were asked about sexual health needs, and fewer were referred to gynecology, suggesting increased women's healthcare provided by residents.

A Closer Look at Women's Health Centers: Historical Lessons and Future Aims

Women's Health Centers (WHC) have evolved over the last few decades as comprehensive centers for women's health care. This article reviews the history and evaluation of WHC, as well as opportunities for women's health training. Prior studies comparing WHC with traditional primary care and obstetrics/gynecology clinics have found that WHC offer at least similar levels of preventative care, may increase access to care for a more diverse patient population, and improve patient/provider relationship satisfaction. WHC also increase women's health providers' education and research opportunities. There is still a gap in women's health education and training, although residency and fellowship programs have aimed to address this through women's health tracks and fellowships. The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic and its negative impact on women's access to care have further highlighted the potential of WHC to meet women's health care demands. WHC can provide comprehensive, convenient, and single-site care for women. The increased opportunities for women's health training through WHC give rise to more representation in leadership and investment in women's health. New research is needed to reassess and further evaluate health outcomes of WHC compared with traditional care models.

Estimating the residency expansion required to avoid projected primary care physician shortages by 2035

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to calculate the projected primary care physician shortage, determine the amount and composition of residency growth needed, and estimate the impact of retirement age and panel size changes.

METHODS

We used the 2010 National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey to calculate utilization of ambulatory primary care services and the US Census Bureau to project demographic changes. To determine the baseline number of primary care physicians and the number retiring at 66 years, we used the 2014 American Medical Association Masterfile. Using specialty board and American Osteopathic Association figures, we estimated the annual production of primary care residents. To calculate shortages, we subtracted the accumulated primary care physician production from the accumulated number of primary care physicians needed for each year from 2015 to 2035.

RESULTS

More than 44,000 primary care physicians will be needed by 2035. Current primary care production rates will be unable to meet demand, resulting in a shortage in excess of 33,000 primary care physicians. Given current production, an additional 1,700 primary care residency slots will be necessary by 2035. A 10% reduction in the ratio of population per primary care physician would require more than 3,000 additional slots by 2035, whereas changing the expected retirement age from 66 years to 64 years would require more than 2,400 additional slots.

CONCLUSIONS

To eliminate projected shortages in 2035, primary care residency production must increase by 21% compared with current production. Delivery models that shift toward smaller ratios of population to primary care physicians may substantially increase the shortage.

Care from family physicians reported by pregnant women in the United States

PURPOSE

We describe the proportion of family physicians providing care of any sort to pregnant women in the United States from 2000 to 2009.

METHODS

We used a repeat, cross-sectional design with data from the nationally representative Integrated Health Interview Series (2000-2009) for respondents who reported being pregnant at the time of the survey (N = 3,204). Using multivariate logistic regression, we modeled changes over time in pregnant women's reports of care from family physicians. We used interaction terms to test for regional differences in trends.

RESULTS

Approximately one-third of pregnant women reported having seen or talked to a family physician for medical care during the prior year, a percentage that remained stable for the period of 2000 to 2009 (adjusted odds ratio for annual change = 1.006). Most pregnant women reported care from multiple types of clinicians, including family physicians, obstetrician-gynecologists, midwives, nurse practitioners, and physician assistants. There were regional differences in trends in family physician care; pregnant women in the North Central United States increasingly reported care from family physicians, whereas women in the South reported a decline (6.7% annual increase vs 4.7% annual decrease, P ≥.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Trends in family medicine care for pregnant women have remained steady for the nation as a whole, but they differ by region of the United States. Most pregnant women reported care from multiple clinicians, highlighting the importance of care coordination for this patient population.

Missed opportunities in cardiovascular disease prevention?: low rates of hypertension recognition for women at medicine and obstetrics-gynecology clinics

Younger women use both internal medicine and obstetrics-gynecology (OBGYN) clinics as primary sources of health care. However, the role of OBGYN clinics in cardiovascular disease prevention is largely unexplored. The objective of this study was to examine rates of hypertension recognition in women<50 years of age who presented with elevated blood pressures in family practice and internal medicine (medicine) OBGYN clinics and to compare these rates across clinic type. The study's population consisted of 34 627 nonpregnant women ages 18 to 49 years with new-onset hypertension (defined as 2 consecutive visits with elevated blood pressures of systolic blood pressure≥140 mm Hg or diastolic blood pressure≥90 mm Hg with no previous hypertension history) from 2002 to 2006. Multivariate logistic regressions predicting the clinical recognition of hypertension (a recorded diagnosis of hypertension and/or an antihypertensive prescription by any provider within 1 year of the second elevated blood pressure) assessed the association between hypertension recognition and the clinic where the second elevated blood pressure was recorded. Analysis showed that hypertension was recognized in <33% of women with new-onset hypertension. Women whose second consecutive elevated blood pressure was recorded in OBGYN clinics were less likely to be recognized as having hypertension within 12 months by any provider compared with women whose second consecutive elevated blood pressure was recorded in a medicine clinic (odds ratio: 0.51 [95% CI: 0.48 to 0.54]). This study suggests that further attention be paid to identifying and treating cardiovascular disease risk factors in women<50 years of age presenting in both medicine and OBGYN clinics and that improved coordination across care settings has the potential to improve cardiovascular disease prevention in young women.

A brief office educational intervention improved referral rates for hypertension control in women

As part of an initiative to increase physician awareness about hypertension and cardiovascular disease (CVD); we studied the effects of a pilot intervention on the rates of referral for uncontrolled hypertension in an Ob-Gyn office. Physicians in an Ob-Gyn practice completed an educational session regarding hypertension and used a 1-page tracking form in their medical records for 3 months. Trained personnel reviewed medical records to compare baseline rates of hypertension control to those at the end of the intervention. Rates of counseling about lifestyle modification to control hypertension were also documented. The rate of referral for hypertension was significantly increased after 3 months (p<0.001). The rates of counseling about CVD risk factors approached 100%. In this study, hypertension was commonly under-treated, despite being a major risk factor for CVD. As primary care physicians, obstetrician-gynecologists are in an excellent position to facilitate evaluation and treatment of hypertension in women. Education about the importance of hypertension control along with a simple tracking form can assist Ob-Gyn physicians in complying with JNC 7 guidelines.

Diagnostic experience among 4,334 women reporting surgically diagnosed endometriosis

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether first physician seen and symptoms beginning in adolescence have an impact on the diagnostic experience of endometriosis.

DESIGN

Cross-sectional study of self-reported survey data.

SETTING

Academic research.

PATIENT(S)

Four thousand three hundred thirty-four Endometriosis Association Survey respondents reporting surgical diagnosis of endometriosis.

INTERVENTION(S)

None.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S)

Specialty of first physician seen, timing of onset of symptoms, time to seeking medical care and to diagnosis, number of physicians seen, and satisfaction with care.

RESULT(S)

Almost all respondents reported pelvic pain. Fifty percent first saw a gynecologist and 45% saw a generalist for symptoms related to endometriosis. Two thirds reported symptoms beginning during adolescence; they waited longer to seek medical care than adults did. Those seeing a generalist first took longest to get diagnosed; those seeing a gynecologist first saw fewer physicians. Sometime before diagnosis, 63% were told nothing was wrong with them.

CONCLUSION(S)

Women and girls who reported seeing a gynecologist first for symptoms related to endometriosis were more likely to have a shorter time to diagnosis, to see fewer physicians, and to report a better experience overall with their physicians. The majority reported symptoms beginning during adolescence, also reporting a longer time and worse experience while obtaining a diagnosis.

Routine preventive services for older women: a composite measure highlights gaps in delivery

BACKGROUND

We used a composite measure to examine the delivery of routine clinical preventive services to U.S. women aged 50-64 years and > or =65 years in 2004.

METHODS

We analyzed state data from the 2004 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS) and created a composite measure that included screening of women > or =50 years for colorectal cancer, cervical cancer, breast cancer, vaccination against influenza, and, for women aged > or =65 years only, pneumococcal vaccination. The composite measure quantified the percentage of women who were up-to-date (UTD) according to recommended schedules for these services.

RESULTS

Approximately 23% of women aged 50-64 years and 32.5% of women aged > or =65 years were UTD in 2004. Results varied by education, race/ethnicity, marriage status, insurance status, and health status. There was also considerable geographic variation in state-specific UTD estimates, ranging from 16.7% (California) to 38.4% (Minnesota) for women aged 50-64 years and from 25.7% (Indiana) to 48.5% (Minnesota) for women aged > or =65 years.

CONCLUSIONS

Although rates for some individual services were > or =75%, the percentage of women aged 50-64 years and > or =65 years UTD on all routinely recommended cancer screenings and vaccinations was low, with <1 in 3 being UTD.