Relationship of obesity to outcome of medical abortion

Efficacy of Ibuprofen Lysine on First-Trimester AbortionRelated Pain and Hemorrhage: A Randomized TripleBlinded Clinical Trial

BACKGROUND

Some recent trials have reported high efficacy for nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) in relieving medical abortion-related pain. The aim of this study was to determine the beneficial effect of oral NSAIDs (ibuprofen lysine) in reduction of pain and hemorrhage in first-trimester medical abortion.

METHODS

This randomized triple-blinded clinical trial was performed on 98 pregnant women who were candidate for medical abortion within the first-trimester period (gestational age<12 weeks). The participants were randomly assigned to receive ibuprofen lysine (684 mg orally every 4 hours) or placebo. All patients were initially treated with misoprostol (800 µg every 3 hours). Pain intensity and rate of hemorrhage were assessed every hour up to 15 hours after receiving the first dose of misoprostol by visual analogue scaling (VAS) and pictorial blood loss assessment chart (PBAC), respectively.

RESULTS

Assessing the mean pain score within 15 hours of receiving misoprostol showed significantly lower pain intensity within the first 10 hours of assessment in the group receiving NSAID in comparison with the control group (P<0.001). The bleeding rate was also significantly lower in the NSAID group at the fifth (P=0.013) and ninth (P=0.040) hour of receiving misoprostol compared to the control group. We found no difference in abortion-related complication rate between the NSAID and placebo groups (8.3% versus 8.0%, P=0.952).

CONCLUSION

The use of NSAIDs (ibuprofen lysine) is a good pharmacological analgesic option for relieving medical abortionrelated pain and hemorrhage.

Factors Influencing the Duration of Termination of Pregnancy for Fetal Anomaly with Mifepristone in Combination with Misoprostol

This study's aim was to determine relevant factors that influence the time interval between first induction and fetal expulsion in late termination of pregnancy (TOP) and TOP after previous feticide for severe fetal malformation with a mifepristone-misoprostol regime. This retrospective study included 913 TOPs from a single tertiary care referral center. In 197 out of 913 TOPs, a previous feticide had been performed due to advanced gestational age (after 22 + 0 weeks of gestation). Induction was accomplished using 600 mg mifepristone followed by 400 μg misoprostol. The interval between first induction with misoprostol and fetal expulsion was examined. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis were used to predict an induction interval of 12 h or less. The median gestational age at induction of labor was 18.9 weeks of pregnancy. In 487 (53.3%) cases women delivered within 12 h; in 344 (37.7%) cases the induction interval was between 12 h and 36 h. In 82 (9%) cases induction took longer than 36 h. Factors that were significantly associated with a delivery duration of <12 h were a lower gestational age at induction (OR 0.87; 95% CI 0.84-0.89; p < 0.001) and a history of at least one previous vaginal delivery (OR 1.57; 95% CI 1.20-2.05; p < 0.001). Factors that had no impact included previous cesarean section, performing feticide before induction and maternal age. Maternal BMI showed a non-significant trend.

Predicting the likelihood of successful medical treatment of early pregnancy loss: development and internal validation of a clinical prediction model

STUDY QUESTION

What are clinical predictors for successful medical treatment in case of early pregnancy loss (EPL)?

SUMMARY ANSWER

Use of mifepristone, BMI, number of previous uterine aspirations and the presence of minor clinical symptoms (slight vaginal bleeding or some abdominal cramps) at treatment start are predictors for successful medical treatment in case of EPL.

WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY

Success rates of medical treatment for EPL vary strongly, between but also within different treatment regimens. Up until now, although some predictors have been identified, no clinical prediction model has been developed yet.

STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION

Secondary analysis of a multicentre randomized controlled trial in 17 Dutch hospitals, executed between 28 June 2018 and 8 January 2020.

PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS

Women with a non-viable pregnancy between 6 and 14 weeks of gestational age, who opted for medical treatment after a minimum of 1 week of unsuccessful expectant management. Potential predictors for successful medical treatment of EPL were chosen based on literature and expert opinions. We internally validated the prediction model using bootstrapping techniques.

MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE

237 out of 344 women had a successful medical EPL treatment (68.9%). The model includes the following variables: use of mifepristone, BMI, number of previous uterine aspirations and the presence of minor clinical symptoms (slight vaginal bleeding or some abdominal cramps) at treatment start. The model shows a moderate capacity to discriminate between success and failure of treatment, with an AUC of 67.6% (95% CI = 64.9-70.3%). The model had a good fit comparing predicted to observed probabilities of success but might underestimate treatment success in women with a predicted probability of success of ∼70%.

LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION

The vast majority (90.4%) of women were Caucasian, potentially leading to less optimal model performance in a non-Caucasian population. Limitations of our model are that we have not yet been able to externally validate its performance and clinical impact, and the moderate accuracy of the prediction model of 0.67.

WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS

We developed a prediction model, aimed to improve and personalize counselling for medical treatment of EPL by providing a woman with her individual chance of complete evacuation.

STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S)

The Triple M Trial, upon which this secondary analysis was performed, was funded by the Healthcare Insurers Innovation Foundation (project number 3080 B15-191).

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

Clinicaltrials.gov: NCT03212352.

Pathways to Abortion at a Tertiary Care Hospital: Examining Obesity and Delays

CONTEXT

Advancing gestational age can increase the cost of an abortion and is a significant risk factor for complications. While obesity is not associated with increased risks, anecdotal evidence suggests that obese women seeking services at freestanding abortion clinics are often referred for hospital-based care, which can lead to delays.

METHODS

In 2016, a cross-sectional survey collected data on the experiences of 201 women who had obtained abortions at a hospital-based clinic in Philadelphia; rates of medical complications were determined from hospital records. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was used to assess if obesity was associated with whether patients had been referred from freestanding abortion clinics or reported other paths to care. Differences in wait time and up-front out-of-pocket costs were examined by women's referral status.

RESULTS

No difference in rates of abortion complications was found between patient groups. Women who were severely obese (body mass index of at least 40 kg/m² ) were more likely than normal-weight individuals to have been referred from a freestanding abortion clinic (odds ratio, 7.5). The median wait time to get an abortion was 28 days for referred patients and 12 days for others. Multivariable analysis confirmed that referred patients waited twice as long as other patients (rate ratio, 2.0) and paid 66% more in up-front costs.

CONCLUSIONS

Future research is needed to determine whether obese women seeking abortions are being referred despite evidence that they do not require hospital-based care. If obese women are suffering delays because of referral, strategies to help overcome delay should also be explored.