Neonatal outcomes of elective early-term births after demonstrated fetal lung maturity

Improving maternal and neonatal outcomes for women with gestational diabetes through continuity of midwifery care: A cross-sectional study

PROBLEM

Gestational Diabetes Mellitus (GDM) is a complication of pregnancy which may exclude women from midwife-led models of care.

BACKGROUND

There is a paucity of research evaluating the safety and feasibility of continuity of midwifery care (CoMC) for women with GDM.

AIM

To investigate the impact of CoMC on maternal and neonatal outcomes, for otherwise low-risk women with GDM.

METHODS

This exploratory cross-sectional study observed maternal and neonatal outcomes including onset of labour, augmentation, labour analgesia, mode of birth, perineal trauma, gestation at birth, shoulder dystocia, infant birth weight, neonatal feeding at discharge.

FINDINGS

Participants were 287 otherwise low-risk pregnant women, who developed GDM, and either received CoMC (n=36) or standard hospital maternity care (non-CoMC) (n=251). Women with GDM who received CoMC were significantly more likely to experience an spontaneous onset of labour (OR 6.3; 95% CI 2.7-14.5; p<.001), labour without an epidural (OR 4.2; 95% CI 2.0 - 9.2,<0.001) and exclusively breastfeed (OR 4.3; 95% CI 1.26 - 14.32; p=0.02).

DISCUSSION

Receiving CoMC may be a public health initiative which not only improves maternal and neonatal outcomes, but also long-term morbidity associated with GDM.

CONCLUSION

Findings provide preliminary evidence suggesting CoMC improves maternal and neonatal outcomes and is likely a safe and viable option for otherwise low-risk women with GDM. Larger studies are recommended to confirm findings and explore the full impact of CoMC for women with GDM.

The role of labor induction in modern obstetrics

A primary goal of obstetrical practice is the optimization of maternal and perinatal health. This goal translates into a seemingly simple assessment with regard to considerations of the timing of delivery: delivery should occur when the benefits are greater than those of continued pregnancy. In the absence of an indication for cesarean delivery, planned delivery is initiated with induction of labor. When medical or obstetrical complications exist, they may guide recommendations regarding the timing of delivery. In the absence of these complications, gestational age also has been used to guide delivery timing, given its association with both maternal and perinatal adverse outcomes. If there is no medical indication, delivery before 39 weeks has been discouraged, given its association with greater chances of adverse perinatal outcomes. Conversely, it has been recommended that delivery occur by 42 weeks of gestation, given the perinatal risks that accrue in the post-term period. Historically, a 39-week induction of labor, particularly for individuals with no previous birth, has not been routinely offered in the absence of medical or obstetrical indications. That approach was based on numerous observational studies that demonstrated an increased risk of cesarean delivery and other adverse outcomes among individuals who underwent labor induction compared to those in spontaneous labor. However, from a management and person-centered-choice perspective, the relevant comparison is between those undergoing planned labor induction at a given time vs those planning to continue pregnancy beyond that time. When individuals have been compared using that rubric-either in observational studies or randomized trials that have been performed in a wide variety of locations and populations- there has not been evidence that induction increases adverse perinatal or maternal outcomes. Conversely, even when the only indication for delivery is the achievement of a full-term gestational age, evidence suggests that multiple different outcomes, including cesarean delivery, hypertensive disorders of pregnancy, neonatal respiratory impairment, and perinatal mortality, are less likely when induction is performed. This information underscores the importance of making the preferences of pregnant individuals for different birth processes and outcomes central to the approach to delivery timing.

Risks of stillbirth, neonatal mortality, and severe neonatal morbidity by birthweight centiles associated with expectant management at term

BACKGROUND

Determining the optimal time of birth at term is challenging given the ongoing risks of stillbirth with increasing gestation vs the risks of significant neonatal morbidity at early-term gestations. These risks are more pronounced in small infants.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to evaluate the risks of stillbirth, neonatal mortality, and severe neonatal morbidity by comparing expectant management with delivery from 37+0 weeks of gestation.

STUDY DESIGN

This was a retrospective cohort study evaluating women with singleton, nonanomalous pregnancies at 37+0 to 40+6 weeks' gestation in Queensland, Australia, delivered from 2000 to 2018. Rates of stillbirth, neonatal death, and severe neonatal morbidity were calculated for <3rd, 3rd to <10th, 10th to <25th, 25th to <90th, and ≥90th birthweight centiles. The composite risk of mortality with expectant management for an additional week in utero was compared with rates of neonatal mortality and severe neonatal morbidity.

RESULTS

Of 948,895 singleton, term nonanomalous births, 813,077 occurred at 37+0 to 40+6 weeks' gestation. Rates of stillbirth increased with gestational age, with the highest rate observed in infants with birthweight below the third centile: 10.0 per 10,000 (95% confidence interval, 6.2-15.3) at 37+0 to 37+6 weeks, rising to 106.4 per 10,000 (95% confidence interval, 74.6-146.9) at 40+0 to 40+6 weeks' gestation. The rate of neonatal mortality was highest at 37+0 to 37+6 weeks for all birthweight centiles. The composite risk of expectant management rose sharply after 39+0 to 39+6 weeks, and was highest in infants with birthweight below the third centile (125.2/10,000; 95% confidence interval, 118.4-132.3) at 40+0 to 40+6 weeks' gestation. Balancing the risk of expectant management and delivery (neonatal mortality), the optimal timing of delivery for each birthweight centile was evaluated on the basis of relative risk differences. The rate of severe neonatal morbidity sharply decreased in the period between 37+0 to 37+6 and 38+0 to 38+6 weeks, particularly for infants with birthweight below the third centile.

CONCLUSION

Our data suggest that the optimal time of birth is 37+0 to 37+6 weeks for infants with birthweight <3rd centile and 38+0 to 38+6 weeks' gestation for those with birthweight between the 3rd and 10th centile and >90th centile. For all other birthweight centiles, birth from 39+0 weeks is associated with the best outcomes. However, large numbers of planned births are required to prevent a single excess death. The healthcare costs and acceptability to women of potential universal policies of planned birth need to be carefully considered.

Can we improve our ability to interpret category II fetal heart rate tracings using additional clinical parameters?

OBJECTIVES

This study examined predictive factors, in addition to Category II Fetal Herat Rate (FHR) monitoring that might imply fetal acidosis and risk of asphyxia.

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study compared three groups of patients with Category II FHR monitoring indicating need for imminent delivery. Groups were divided based on fetal cord blood pH: pH≤7.0, 7.0<pH<7.2 and pH≥7.2. Demographics, medical history, delivery data and early neonatal outcomes were reviewed.

RESULTS

The cohort included 417 women. Nine (2.2%) had cord pH≤7.0, 105 (25.2%) pH 7.0 to 7.2 and 303 (72.6%) ad pH≥7.2. Background characteristics, pregnancy follow-up and intrauterine fetal evaluation prior to delivery were similar in all groups. As expected, more patients in the low pH group had cesarean section (55.6%), than vaginal delivery or vacuum extraction (p=0.02). Five-minute Apgar scores were similar in all groups.

CONCLUSIONS

This retrospective study did not detect a specific parameter that could help predict the prognosis of fetal acidosis and risk of asphyxia. As we only included patients with a Category II tracing that was worrisome enough to lead to imminent delivery, it is reasonable to believe that this is due to patient selection, meaning that when the Category II FHR results in decision for prompt delivery, there is no added value in additional clinical characteristics. The evaluation should be expanded to all patients with Category II tracing for better interpretation tools for Category II FHR monitors, as well as a larger study population.

Cerebroplacental doppler ratio and perinatal outcome in late-onset foetal growth restriction

The purpose of this study was to determine whether gestational age-specific levels of the cerebroplacental ratio (CPR) as a third-trimester ultrasound marker has benefits in the prediction of perinatal morbidity and mortality on foetuses with late-onset foetal growth restriction (FGR). A retrospective study of singleton pregnancies diagnosed with late-onset FGR was performed. Of 407 pregnancies meeting our inclusion criteria, 313 had normal (Group 1) and 94 had abnormal CPR (Group 2). Both groups were similar in age, gestational age at diagnosis, body mass index and parity. There was a significant association between the presence of oligohydramnios and abnormal CPR. Mean gestational age at delivery and mean neonatal birth weight were significantly lower in Group 2. Neonatal intensive care unit admission, foetal distress, low 5-minute Apgar score <7, and low cord pH < 7.1 rates were significantly higher in Group 2. There was one neonatal death in both groups. Multivariable regression analysis demonstrated that, in the prediction of APO, there was a significant contribution from neonatal birth weight <10th percentile, CPR <5th percentile and oligohydramniosis. Our findings revealed that CPR value less than 5th centile can be used as a predictor of APO in late-onset FGR.IMPACT STATEMENTWhat is already known on this subject? Low cerebroplacetal ratio (CPR) is a marker of failure to reach the growth potential regardless of foetal weight.What do the results of this study add? The CPR can be used as an adequate predictor of adverse perinatal outcome in pregnancies with late-onset foetal growth restriction.What are the implications of these findings for clinical practice and/or further research? Routine calculation and report of CPR during basic ultrasound examination may help to identify foetuses with FR with a higher risk of adverse perinatal outcome. Future prospective studies on pregnancies with FGR with oligohydroamnios or normal amniotic fluid volume should focus on determining CPR threshold.

Medically Indicated Late-Preterm and Early-Term Deliveries: ACOG Committee Opinion, Number 831

ABSTRACT

The neonatal risks of late-preterm and early-term births are well established, and the potential neonatal complications associated with elective delivery at less than 39 0/7 weeks of gestation are well described. However, there are a number of maternal, fetal, and placental complications in which either a late-preterm or early-term delivery is warranted. The timing of delivery in such cases must balance the maternal and newborn risks of late-preterm and early-term delivery with the risks associated with further continuation of pregnancy. Deferring delivery to the 39th week is not recommended if there is a medical or obstetric indication for earlier delivery. If there is a clear indication for a late-preterm or early-term delivery for either maternal or newborn benefit, then delivery should occur regardless of the results of lung maturity testing. Conversely, if delivery could be delayed safely in the context of an immature lung profile result, then no clear indication for a late-preterm or early-term delivery exists. Also, there remain several conditions for which data to guide delivery timing are not available. Some examples of these conditions include uterine dehiscence or chronic placental abruption. Delivery timing in these circumstances should be individualized and based on the current clinical situation.

Guideline No. 402: Diagnosis and Management of Placenta Previa

OBJECTIVES

To summarize the current evidence and to make recommendations for diagnosis and classification of placenta previa and for managing the care of women with this diagnosis.

OPTIONS

To manage in hospital or as an outpatient and to perform a cesarean delivery preterm or at term or to allow a trial of labour when a diagnosis of placenta previa or a low-lying placenta is suspected or confirmed.

OUTCOMES

Prolonged hospitalization, preterm birth, rate of cesarean delivery, maternal morbidity and mortality, and postnatal morbidity and mortality.

INTENDED USERS

Family physicians, obstetricians, midwives, and other maternal care providers.

TARGET POPULATION

Pregnant women with placenta previa or low-lying placenta.

EVIDENCE

Medline, PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library were searched from inception to October 2018. Medical Subject Heading (MeSH) terms and key words related to pregnancy, placenta previa, low-lying placenta, antepartum hemorrhage, short cervical length, preterm labour, and cesarean. This document represents an abstraction of the evidence rather than a methodological review.

VALIDATION METHODS

This guideline has been reviewed by the Maternal-Fetal Medicine and Diagnostic Imaging committees of the Society of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists of Canada (SOGC) and approved by the SOGC Board of Directors.

BENEFITS, HARMS, AND/OR COSTS

Women with placenta previa or low-lying placenta are at increased risk of maternal, fetal and postnatal adverse outcomes that include a potentially incorrect diagnosis and possibly unnecessary hospitalization, restriction of activities, early delivery, or cesarean delivery. Optimization of diagnosis and management protocols has potential to improve maternal, fetal and postnatal outcomes.

SUMMARY STATEMENTS (GRADE RATINGS IN PARENTHESES)

RECOMMENDATIONS (GRADE RATINGS IN PARENTHESES).

Medically Indicated Late-Preterm and Early-Term Deliveries: ACOG Committee Opinion, Number 818

ABSTRACT

The neonatal risks of late-preterm and early-term births are well established, and the potential neonatal complications associated with elective delivery at less than 39 0/7 weeks of gestation are well described. However, there are a number of maternal, fetal, and placental complications in which either a late-preterm or early-term delivery is warranted. The timing of delivery in such cases must balance the maternal and newborn risks of late-preterm and early-term delivery with the risks associated with further continuation of pregnancy. Deferring delivery to the 39th week is not recommended if there is a medical or obstetric indication for earlier delivery. If there is a clear indication for a late-preterm or early-term delivery for either maternal or newborn benefit, then delivery should occur regardless of the results of lung maturity testing. Conversely, if delivery could be delayed safely in the context of an immature lung profile result, then no clear indication for a late-preterm or early-term delivery exists. Also, there remain several conditions for which data to guide delivery timing are not available. Some examples of these conditions include uterine dehiscence or chronic placental abruption. Delivery timing in these circumstances should be individualized and based on the current clinical situation. This Committee Opinion is being revised to include frequent obstetric conditions that would necessitate delivery before 39 weeks of gestation and to apply the most up-to-date evidence supporting delivery recommendations.

Evaluation of Pregnancy Outcomes Among Women With Decreased Fetal Movements

IMPORTANCE

Stillbirth is a devastating pregnancy outcome with far-reaching economic and psychosocial consequences, but despite significant investment, a screening tool for identifying those fetuses at risk for stillbirth remains elusive. Maternal reporting of decreased fetal movements (DFM) has been found to be associated with stillbirth and other adverse perinatal outcomes.

OBJECTIVE

To examine pregnancy outcomes of women presenting with DFM in the third trimester at a tertiary Australian center with a clear clinical management algorithm.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

This cohort study used data on all births meeting the inclusion criteria from 2009 through 2019 at Mater Mothers' Hospital in Brisbane, Australia. This is a tertiary center and Australia's largest maternity hospital. All singleton births without a known congenital anomaly after 28 weeks' gestation were included. Among 203 071 potential participants identified from the hospital database, 101 597 individuals met the eligibility criteria. Data analysis was performed from May through September 2020.

EXPOSURE

Presentation to hospital with DFM after 28 weeks gestation.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

The primary outcome of this study was the incidence of stillbirth. Multivariate analysis was undertaken to determine the association between DFM and stillbirth, obstetric intervention, and other adverse outcomes, including being born small for gestational age (SGA) and a composite adverse perinatal outcome (at least 1 of the following: neonatal intensive care unit admission, severe acidosis [ie, umbilical artery pH <7.0 or base excess -12.0 mmol/L or less], 5-minute Apgar score <4, or stillbirth or neonatal death). The hypothesis being tested was formulated prior to data collection.

RESULTS

Among 101 597 women with pregnancies that met the inclusion criteria, 8821 (8.7%) presented at least once with DFM and 92 776 women (91.3%) did not present with DFM (ie, the control population). Women presenting with DFM, compared with those presenting without DFM, were younger (mean [SD] age, 30.4 [5.4] years vs 31.5 [5.2] years; P < .001), more likely to be nulliparous (4845 women [54.9%] vs 42 210 women [45.5%]; P < .001) and have a previous stillbirth (189 women [2.1%] vs 1156 women [1.2%]; P < .001), and less likely to have a previous cesarean delivery (1199 women [13.6%] vs 17 444 women [18.8%]; P < .001). During the study period, the stillbirth rate was 2.0 per 1000 births after 28 weeks' gestation. Presenting with DFM was not associated with higher odds of stillbirth (9 women [0.1%] vs 185 women [0.2%]; adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 0.54; 95% CI, 0.23-1.26, P = .16). However, presenting with DFM was associated with higher odds of a fetus being born SGA (aOR, 1.14; 95% CI, 1.03-1.27; P = .01) and the composite adverse perinatal outcome (aOR, 1.14; 95% CI, 1.02-1.27; P = .02). Presenting with DFM was also associated with higher odds of planned early term birth (aOR, 1.26; 95% CI, 1.15-1.38; P < .001), induction of labor (aOR, 1.63; 95% CI, 1.53-1.74; P < .001), and emergency cesarean delivery (aOR, 1.18; 95% CI, 1.09-1.28; P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

The presence of DFM is a marker associated with increased risk for a fetus. This study's findings of a nonsignificantly lower rate of stillbirth among women with DFM may be reflective of increased community awareness of timely presentation to their obstetric care clinician when concerned about fetal movements and the benefits of tertiary level care guided by a clear clinical management protocol. However, DFM was associated with increased odds of an infant being born SGA, obstetric intervention, early term birth, and a composite of adverse perinatal outcomes.

[Perinatal conditions of late preterm twins versus early term twins]

OBJECTIVE

To study the perinatal complications of late preterm twins (LPTs) versus early term twins (ETTs).

METHODS

A retrospective analysis was performed for the complications of 246 LPTs, 496 ETTs, and their mothers. The risk factors for late preterm birth were analyzed. According to gestational age, the twins were divided into five groups: 34-34⁺⁶ weeks (n=44), 35-35⁺⁶ weeks (n=70), 36-36⁺⁶ weeks (n=132), 37-37⁺⁶ weeks (n=390), and 38-38⁺⁶ weeks (n=106). The perinatal complications were compared between groups.

RESULTS

Maternal hypertension, maternal thrombocytopenia, placenta previa, and premature rupture of membranes were independent risk factors for late preterm birth in twins (P < 0.05). The LPT group had higher incidence rates of respiratory diseases, feeding intolerance, and hypoglycemia than the ETT group (P < 0.05). The 34-34⁺⁶ weeks group had a higher incidence rate of neonatal asphyxia than the 37-37⁺⁶ weeks and 38-38⁺⁶ weeks groups; and had a higher incidence rate of septicemia than 36-36⁺⁶ weeks group (P < 0.0045). The 34-34⁺⁶ weeks and 35-35⁺⁶ weeks groups had higher incidence rates of neonatal respiratory distress syndrome, neonatal apnea, and anemia than the other three groups; and had higher incidence rates of neonatal pneumonia, hypoglycemia and septicemia than the 37-37⁺⁶ weeks and 38-38⁺⁶ weeks groups (P < 0.0045). The 35-35⁺⁶ weeks group had a higher incidence rate of feeding intolerance than the 36-36⁺⁶ weeks, 37-37⁺⁶ weeks, and 38-38⁺⁶ weeks groups (P < 0.0045). The 36-36⁺⁶ weeks group had a lower incidence rate of hypoglycemia than the 34-34⁺⁶ weeks group and a higher incidence rate of hypoglycemia than the 37-37⁺⁶ weeks group (P < 0.0045).

CONCLUSIONS

Compared with ETTs, LPTs have an increased incidence of perinatal complications. The incidence of perinatal complications is associated with gestational ages in the LPTs and ETTs.

Transcutaneous Bilirubin Levels and Risk of Significant Hyperbilirubinemia in Early-Term and Term Newborns

OBJECTIVE

To compare the course of the transcutaneous bilirubin (TcB) values of early-term newborns with those of term newborns in the first month of life and to investigate whether early-term newborns have an increased risk of significant hyperbilirubinemia requiring treatment.

DESIGN

A prospective, controlled cohort analysis.

SETTING

A tertiary level mother-child birth and health care center.

PARTICIPANTS

Four hundred early-term (37 0/7 to 38 6/7 weeks) and 320 term (39 0/7 to 41 6/7 weeks) newborns born during a 27-month period.

METHODS

A total of six TcB measurements in a longitudinal manner were made in early-term and term newborns: the first two at 6 and 48 hours after birth and the next four on routine examination days (Days 4, 7, 15, and 30). Demographic characteristics, values of daily TcB measurements, number of newborns with significant hyperbilirubinemia, and risk of jaundice requiring treatment were compared between the two groups.

RESULTS

All six TcB values were significantly greater in the early-term group than in the term group (p < .001 for each). Early-term newborns had a statistically significant increased risk of jaundice requiring treatment compared to term newborns (risk ratio = 1.91; 95% confidence interval [1.23-2.96]; p = .0046). Results of the repeated-measures analysis of variance and post hoc adjusted multiple comparison analysis showed that TcB levels increased to and peaked at 96 hours after birth and then gradually decreased to baseline (first measurement) levels at 30 days after birth in each group.

CONCLUSIONS

Early-term newborns should not be treated as full-term newborns because they have significantly higher TcB levels. These newborns should be closely monitored for pathologic jaundice because they have increased risk for significant hyperbilirubinemia requiring phototherapy.

[Perinatal conditions of late preterm twins versus early term twins]

OBJECTIVE

To study the perinatal complications of late preterm twins (LPTs) versus early term twins (ETTs).

METHODS

A retrospective analysis was performed for the complications of 246 LPTs, 496 ETTs, and their mothers. The risk factors for late preterm birth were analyzed. According to gestational age, the twins were divided into five groups: 34-34+6 weeks (n=44), 35-35+6 weeks (n=70), 36-36+6 weeks (n=132), 37-37+6 weeks (n=390), and 38-38+6 weeks (n=106). The perinatal complications were compared between groups.

RESULTS

Maternal hypertension, maternal thrombocytopenia, placenta previa, and premature rupture of membranes were independent risk factors for late preterm birth in twins (P < 0.05). The LPT group had higher incidence rates of respiratory diseases, feeding intolerance, and hypoglycemia than the ETT group (P < 0.05). The 34-34+6 weeks group had a higher incidence rate of neonatal asphyxia than the 37-37+6 weeks and 38-38+6 weeks groups; and had a higher incidence rate of septicemia than 36-36+6 weeks group (P < 0.0045). The 34-34+6 weeks and 35-35+6 weeks groups had higher incidence rates of neonatal respiratory distress syndrome, neonatal apnea, and anemia than the other three groups; and had higher incidence rates of neonatal pneumonia, hypoglycemia and septicemia than the 37-37+6 weeks and 38-38+6 weeks groups (P < 0.0045). The 35-35+6 weeks group had a higher incidence rate of feeding intolerance than the 36-36+6 weeks, 37-37+6 weeks, and 38-38+6 weeks groups (P < 0.0045). The 36-36+6 weeks group had a lower incidence rate of hypoglycemia than the 34-34+6 weeks group and a higher incidence rate of hypoglycemia than the 37-37+6 weeks group (P < 0.0045).

CONCLUSIONS

Compared with ETTs, LPTs have an increased incidence of perinatal complications. The incidence of perinatal complications is associated with gestational ages in the LPTs and ETTs.

Adverse outcomes in early term versus full-term deliveries among higher-order cesarean births

OBJECTIVE

In an attempt to avoid emergency deliveries of women with multiple prior scars, providers may choose to schedule those repeat cesarean births prior to 39 weeks. Our primary goal was to compare rates of assisted ventilation use between neonates with early term (37°-38⁶ weeks) and full-term (39°-39⁶ weeks) deliveries among women with three or more prior cesarean births.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study of women with three or more previous cesarean births. The study group consisted of women who delivered at early term (37°-38⁶ weeks). The control group consisted of women who delivered at full term (39°-39⁶ weeks gestation). Women with a history of pre-gestational diabetes, gestational hypertension and chronic hypertension were excluded. Data were extracted from the 2017 United States Natality database. Characteristics were compared between groups for potential confounders. Primary outcome, neonatal assisted ventilation use greater than 6 h, and other secondary outcomes (including immediate assisted ventilation in the neonate and uterine rupture) were compared between groups. Multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed to adjust for potential confounding factors between groups.

RESULTS

A total of 28,584 women with three or more prior cesarean births were included. There were 12,391 women who delivered at early term, and 16,193 who delivered at full term. Neonates born from women who delivered at early term had an increased risk of assisted ventilation use greater than 6 h compared with neonates who delivered at full term (assisted ventilation greater than 6 h, adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 2.08, 95% confidence interval (CI) [1.59-2.73]). Neonates delivered at early term were also more likely to need immediate ventilation use than were neonates delivered at full term (aOR 1.52, 95% CI [1.33-1.73]). Women who delivered at early term had a higher rate of uterine rupture compared with women who delivered at full term (OR 5.67, 95% CI [2.33-13.79]).

CONCLUSION

Higher order cesarean births performed early term had an increased risk of neonatal assisted ventilation use greater than 6 h compared with full-term births. These results argue against delivering women with multiple prior uterine scars before term in an attempt to avoid emergency sections.

Cervical Ripening and Labor Induction and Augmentation, 5th Edition

Cervical ripening and induction and augmentation of labor are common procedures in labor and birth units. The potential risks and benefits for the procedure should be explained to women so that they can make informed decisions. Clinicians should be knowledgeable about the methods and medications used and be skilled in maternal-fetal assessment. Adequate nurse staffing is required to monitor the mother and fetus to promote the best possible outcomes. This practice monograph includes information on mechanical and pharmacologic methods for cervical ripening; labor induction and augmentation with oxytocin, a high alert drug; and nurse staffing levels and skills needed to provide safe and effective care during cervical ripening and labor induction and augmentation.

Cervical Ripening and Labor Induction and Augmentation, 5th Edition

Cervical ripening and induction and augmentation of labor are common procedures in labor and birth units. The potential risks and benefits for the procedure should be explained to women so that they can make informed decisions. Clinicians should be knowledgeable about the methods and medications used and be skilled in maternal-fetal assessment. Adequate nurse staffing is required to monitor the mother and fetus to promote the best possible outcomes. This practice monograph includes information on mechanical and pharmacologic methods for cervical ripening; labor induction and augmentation with oxytocin, a high alert drug; and nurse staffing levels and skills needed to provide safe and effective care during cervical ripening and labor induction and augmentation.

ACOG Committee Opinion No. 765: Avoidance of Nonmedically Indicated Early-Term Deliveries and Associated Neonatal Morbidities

There are medical indications in pregnancy for which there is evidence or expert opinion to support delivery versus expectant management in the early-term period. However, the risk of adverse outcomes is greater for neonates delivered in the early-term period compared with neonates delivered at 39 weeks of gestation. In addition to immediate adverse perinatal outcomes, multiple studies have shown increased rates of adverse long-term infant outcomes associated with late-preterm and early-term delivery compared with full-term delivery. A recent systematic review found that late-preterm and early-term children have lower performance scores across a range of cognitive and educational measures compared with their full-term peers. Further research is needed to better understand if these differences are primarily based on gestational age at delivery versus medical indications for early delivery. Documentation of fetal pulmonary maturity alone does not necessarily indicate that other fetal physiologic processes are adequately developed. For this reason, amniocentesis for fetal lung maturity is not recommended to guide timing of delivery, even in suboptimally dated pregnancies. Avoidance of nonmedically indicated delivery before 39 0/7 weeks of gestation is distinct from, and should not result in, an increase in expectant management of patients with medical indications for delivery before 39 0/7 weeks of gestation. Management decisions, therefore, should balance the risks of pregnancy prolongation with the neonatal and infant risks associated with early-term delivery. Although there are specific indications for delivery before 39 weeks of gestation, a nonmedically indicated early-term delivery should be avoided. This document is being revised to reflect updated data on nonmedically indicated early-term deliveries.

ACOG Committee Opinion No. 764: Medically Indicated Late-Preterm and Early-Term Deliveries

The neonatal risks of late-preterm and early-term births are well established, and the potential neonatal complications associated with elective delivery at less than 39 0/7 weeks of gestation are well described. However, there are a number of maternal, fetal, and placental complications in which either a late-preterm or early-term delivery is warranted. The timing of delivery in such cases must balance the maternal and newborn risks of late-preterm and early-term delivery with the risks associated with further continuation of pregnancy. Deferring delivery to the 39th week is not recommended if there is a medical or obstetric indication for earlier delivery. If there is a clear indication for a late-preterm or early-term delivery for either maternal or newborn benefit, then delivery should occur regardless of the results of lung maturity testing. Conversely, if delivery could be delayed safely in the context of an immature lung profile result, then no clear indication for a late-preterm or early-term delivery exists. Also, there remain several conditions for which data to guide delivery timing are not available. Some examples of these conditions include uterine dehiscence or chronic placental abruption. Delivery timing in these circumstances should be individualized and based on the current clinical situation. This Committee Opinion is being revised to include frequent obstetric conditions that would necessitate delivery before 39 weeks of gestation and to apply the most up-to-date evidence supporting delivery recommendations.

End of the line for fetal lung maturity testing

OBJECTIVE

During the last decade, guidelines published by the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG) and Society for Maternal Fetal Medicine (SMFM) have emphasized an increasingly limited role for fetal lung maturity (FLM) testing. As a reference laboratory for FLM testing, we were therefore interested in determining the impact of changing guidelines on our test volumes.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed FLM test volume data from 2006 to 2016 for the following FLM assays: lecithin/sphingomyelin ratio, phosphatidylglycerol, disaturated lecithin, and lamellar body count.

RESULTS

We found that there was a precipitous decline in test volumes from 2006 to 2016; our analysis led us to discontinue providing reference laboratory FLM testing in 2016 given the very low volumes.

CONCLUSIONS

The 2019 ACOG guidelines now state that FLM testing no longer has clinical utility. Therefore, clinical laboratory directors should meet with obstetrics providers to discuss discontinuation of FLM testing at their institutions.

Critical appraisal of the proposed defenses for planned home birth

Two prominent proposed defenses have been offered of planned home birth. The first focuses on the very low absolute risk of planned home birth, which is considered to be safe because it is so low, irrespective of its significantly elevated relative risk. The second invokes an analogy between trial of labor after cesarean delivery and planned home birth. Because trial of labor after cesarean delivery and planned home birth have similar, very low absolute risks and because the former is an acceptable clinical practice, defenders of planned home birth argue that the latter should be considered acceptable. This article presents a critical appraisal of these 2 proposed defenses of planned home birth. Question 1: Are proposed defenses of planned home birth focused on its low absolute risks consistent with the commitment to patient safety? This commitment to patient safety requires the identification of variation in the processes of patient care and reduction of variation when reduction improves outcomes. Relative, as well as absolute, risks therefore must be identified. Compared with hospital midwives, planned home births have a significantly higher relative total neonatal mortality risk of 3.87 (1.26 vs 0.32 per 1000 births; P<.001) and a significantly higher relative risk of 5-minute Apgar score of zero of 18.11 (1.63 vs 0.0/1000 births; P<.001). Planned hospital birth prevents these risks. It follows that planned home birth as a variant in birth setting is not consistent with the commitment to patient safety. Question 2: Is the analogy to trial of labor after cesarean delivery consistent with the philosophic rules of analogic reasoning? The long-established philosophic rules for analogic reasoning require that the 2 cases that are compared are similar in all relevant respects and that all relevant analogies have been considered. The 2 cases are dissimilar because the perinatal risks of planned home births are approximately 3 times higher than trial of labor after cesarean delivery. At least 8 clinical analogies to other situations of very low absolute, but unacceptable, risks are ignored. The clinical implication of the results of this critical appraisal is that obstetricians should respond to expressions of interest in planned home birth based on these proposed defenses with a respectful explanation of the inadequacies, the failure to commit to patient safety, and a recommendation for planned hospital birth.