Safety of robotic-assisted gynecologic surgery and early hospital discharge in elderly patients

Advantages of laparoscopy in gynecologic surgery in elderly patients

OBJECTIVE

Geriatric patients requiring gynecological surgery is increasing worldwide. However, older patients are at higher risk of postoperative morbidity and mortality, particularly cardiopulmonary complications. Laparoscopic surgery is widely used as a minimally invasive method for reducing postoperative morbidities. We compared the outcomes of open and laparoscopic gynecologic surgeries in patients older than 55 years.

METHODS

We included patients aged >55 years who underwent gynecological surgery at a single tertiary center between 2010 and 2020, excluding vaginal or ovarian cancer surgeries were excluded. Surgical outcomes were compared between the open surgery and laparoscopic groups, with age cutoff was set at 65 years for optimal discriminative power. We performed linear or logistic regression analyses to compare the surgical outcomes according to age and operation type.

RESULTS

Among 2,983 patients, 28.6% underwent open surgery and 71.4% underwent laparoscopic surgery. Perioperative outcomes of laparoscopic surgery were better than those of open surgery in all groups. In both the open and laparoscopic surgery groups, the older patients showed worse overall surgical outcomes. However, age-related differences in perioperative outcomes were less severe in the laparoscopic group. In the linear regression analysis, the differences in estimated blood loss, transfusion, and hospital stay between the age groups were smaller in the laparoscopy group. Similar restuls were observed in cancer-only and benign-only cohorts.

CONCLUSION

Although the surgical outcomes were worse in the older patients, the difference between age groups was smaller for laparoscopic surgery. Laparoscopic surgery offers more advantages and safety in patients aged >65 years.

Robotic-assisted gynecologic surgery in an older population: A comparison study

INTRODUCTION

Robotic-assisted surgery in select patients has been shown to result in less peri-operative morbidity. Few studies have explored the association of robotic-assisted gynecology oncology surgery complication rates and increasing age. Our objective was to evaluate the peri- and postoperative complication rates in patients age 65 years or above in minimally-invasive robotic gynecologic surgery.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

We performed a retrospective review of data from 765 consecutive minimally-invasive robotic-assisted surgeries performed by high-volume gynecologic oncologists. The patients were divided into "younger" patients aged <65 years and "older" patients aged ≥65 years. The primary outcomes were intraoperative and postoperative complications.

RESULTS

Of the 765 patients analyzed, 185 (24%) were ≥ 65. The intraoperative complication rate in patients <65 was 1.9% (11/580) versus 1.62% (3/185) in females ≥65 (p = 0.808). The postoperative complication rate in patients <65 was 15.5% (90/580) versus 22.7% (42/185) in females ≥65 (p = 0.328). We observed more post-operative complications with patients who had intraoperative complications compared to patients who developed post-operative complications without intraoperative complcations in our sample, but it was not statisticaly significant (OR = 2.78, p = 0.097). The average estimated blood loss was 137.5 ml (0-1000) for patients younger than 65 years and 134.81 ml (0-2200) in patients 65 years or older (p = 0.097).

DISCUSSION

Robotic gynecologic oncology surgery is common. When performed by expert surgeons, complications are not associated with increasing age.

Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS®) society guidelines for gynecologic oncology: Addressing implementation challenges - 2023 update

BACKGROUND

Despite evidence supporting its use, many Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) recommendations remain poorly adhered to and barriers to ERAS implementation persist. In this second updated ERAS® Society guideline, a consensus for optimal perioperative care in gynecologic oncology surgery is presented, with a specific emphasis on implementation challenges.

METHODS

Based on the gaps identified by clinician stakeholder groups, nine implementation challenge topics were prioritized for review. A database search of publications using Embase and PubMed was performed (2018-2023). Studies on each topic were selected with emphasis on meta-analyses, randomized controlled trials, and large prospective cohort studies. These studies were then reviewed and graded by an international panel according to the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) system.

RESULTS

All recommendations on ERAS implementation challenge topics are based on best available evidence. The level of evidence for each item is presented accordingly.

CONCLUSIONS

The updated evidence base and recommendations for stakeholder derived ERAS implementation challenges in gynecologic oncology are presented by the ERAS® Society in this consensus review.

Improved Rates of Same-day Discharge in Patients Undergoing Surgery for Endometrial Cancer Following the COVID-19 Pandemic

STUDY OBJECTIVE

To determine the effect of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic on the rate of same-day discharge (SDD) after minimally invasive surgery for endometrial cancer.

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort.

SETTING

Teaching hospital.

PATIENTS

A total of 166 patients underwent a minimally invasive surgery procedure for the indication of endometrial cancer at a large academic institution from September 1, 2019, to October 1, 2020-80 patients before the implementation of the COVID-19 restrictions and 86 patients after.

INTERVENTIONS

COVID-19 pandemic with visitor restrictions and hospital policy changes placed on March 17, 2020.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

SDD rate was increased by 18% after the start of the COVID-19 pandemic (40% vs 58%, p = .02). There were no differences between the 2 groups with regard to operative time (p = .07), estimated blood loss (p = .21), uterine weight (p = .12), age (p = .06), body mass index (p = .42), or surgery start time (p = .15). In a multivariable logistic regression model, subjects in the COVID-19 group had 3.08 times (95% confidence interval, 1.40-6.74; p = .01) higher odds of SDD than those in the pre-COVID-19 group. There was no difference in 30-day readmission rates (7.5% vs 5.8%, p = .66).

CONCLUSION

There was a significant increase in the SDD of patients with endometrial cancer since the start of the COVID-19 pandemic. The pandemic has strained hospital resources and motivated patients and physicians to avoid hospitalization. This shows that with proper motivation, an increase in SDD rates is possible without an increase in complications or rehospitalization.

Comparison of health-related quality of life of women undergoing robotic surgery, laparoscopic surgery or laparotomy for gynecologic conditions: A cross-sectional study

OBJECTIVE

To assess and compare the health-related quality of life of women undergoing robotic gynecologic surgery, laparoscopic gynecologic surgery or laparotomy for benign and cancerous conditions.

METHODS

Cross-sectional study design was used. The present study was carried out with 240 women, who underwent gynecologic surgery (robotic 48, laparoscopic 96, and laparotomy 96) in a tertiary care hospital. Instruments included a participant description questionnaire and Medical Outcomes Study Short Form-36. The data were collected 4 weeks after surgery, at the first postoperative visit of women to the clinic. Pearson χ² test, one-way analysis of variance, and regression analysis were used to assess the data.

RESULTS

Over half of the women in each group had surgery because of gynecologic cancer. All the subscale scores of Medical Outcomes Study Short Form-36 were significantly higher in the robotic group than the other surgical groups (P < 0.05). Women in the robotic group had better quality of life in terms of both the physical component and the mental component after surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

Knowledge of health-related quality of life in the recovery period after surgery is important for healthcare providers to provide adequate preventive measures, information, and follow up.

Enhanced recovery Pathways in gynecologic surgery: Are they safe and effective in the elderly?

OBJECTIVE

To compare perioperative outcomes of the elderly versus non-elderly patients on ERPs undergoing laparotomy for gynecologic surgery.

METHODS

From January 2016 to June 2017, patients undergoing elective laparotomies for gynecologic surgery were enrolled in a perioperative ERP protocol. Outcomes were compared between the elderly (age ≥ 70 years) and the non-elderly (age ≤ 69 years). Primary outcomes were length of stay and perioperative complication rates. Comparisons were performed using chi-squared tests or Fisher's exact tests for categorical data and Student's t-test or Wilcoxon rank-sum tests for continuous variables, with p < 0.05 for significance.

RESULTS

One hundred eighty-nine patients were enrolled in the study, including 16 patients ≥ 70 years old. The median age was 75 years for the elderly and 45 years for the non-elderly. Elderly patients were more likely to have more complex surgery and longer operative times (absolute median difference of 39 min). Despite the increasing complexity of surgical procedures for elderly patients, there were no statistically significant differences in serious inpatient complications (Clavien-Dindo score 3A or greater), pain and nausea scores, 30-day complications and readmission rates. Elderly patients had a longer median length of stay compared to non-elderly patients by one day (p < 0.001), however, this was not statistically significant on multivariate analysis.

CONCLUSION

In our series, elderly patients on the ERP had similar rates of complications and readmission when compared to non-elderly patients, despite undergoing more complex surgeries. This suggests that ERP may be feasible and safe in the elderly population undergoing elective gynecologic laparotomy.

Comparison Between Laparoscopic and Robotic Surgery in Elderly Patients With Endometrial Cancer: A Retrospective Multicentric Study

Introduction

Elderly endometrial cancer (EEC) patients represent a challenging clinical situation because of the increasing number of clinical morbidities. In this setting of patients, minimally invasive surgery (MIS) has been shown to improve surgical and clinical outcomes. The aim of this study was to evaluate the peri-operative and oncological outcomes of EEC patients who had undergone laparoscopic (LS) or robotic surgery (RS).

Materials and Methods

This is a retrospective multi-institutional study in which endometrial cancer patients of 70 years or older who had undergone MIS for EC from April 2002 to October 2018 were considered. Owing to the non-randomized nature of the study design and the possible allocation biases arising from the retrospective comparison between LS and RS groups, we also performed a propensity score-matched analysis (PSMA).

Results

A total of 537 patients with EC were included in the study: 346 who underwent LS and 191 who underwent RS. No significant statistical differences were found between the two groups in terms of surgical and survival outcomes. 188 were analyzed after PSMA (94 patients in the LS group were matched with 94 patients in the RS group). The median estimated blood loss was higher in the LS group (p=0.001) and the median operative time was higher in the RS group (p=0.0003). No differences emerged between LS and RS in terms of disease free survival (DFS) (p=0.890) and overall survival (OS) (p=0.683).

Conclusions

Our study showed that when compared LS and RS, RS showed lower blood losses and higher operative times. However, none of the two approaches demonstrated to be superior in terms of survival outcomes. For this reason, each patient should be evaluated individually to determine the best surgical approach.

Factors Associated with Same Day Discharge after Laparoscopic Surgery in Gynecologic Oncology

STUDY OBJECTIVE

To identify factors associated with same day discharge (SDD) after laparoscopic surgery in gynecologic oncology.

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort.

SETTING

Teaching hospital.

PATIENTS

Total of 800 patients having minimally invasive surgery in the division of gynecologic oncology during a 20-month period.

INTERVENTION

Minimally invasive surgery cases were reviewed for determinants of SDD to identify factors that could improve the SDD rate.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

During the study period, 800 minimally invasive procedures were performed with a 43.0% SDD rate. Patients who had SDD were younger (52.3 years vs 58.0 years; p <.001), had a lower body mass index (31.1 kg/m² vs 33.7 kg/m²; p <.001), were less likely to have a malignancy (28.2% vs 55.5%; p <.001), had a lower estimated blood loss (36 vs 72 mL; p <.001), and were more likely to have received an enhanced recovery after surgery protocol (49.8% vs 39.3%; p <.003). Total surgical time was shorter in women with SDD (156 minutes vs 208 minutes) as was total narcotic use in morphine equivalents (MEq) (milligram intravenous MEq, 23.1 mg MEq vs 28.8 mg MEq). SDD was also associated with earlier start time (p <.001). Laparoscopic cases were most likely to have SDD (51.4%) as compared with robotic assisted surgery (16.1%) or minilaparotomy (10.5%). There was a wide range of SDD among surgeons ranging from 19.8% to 56.2% (p <.001). In a multivariate analysis, the factors predicting SDD in order of predictive factors were surgical time (p <.001), recovery time (p <.001), start time (p <.001), surgeon (p <.001), age (p <.001), estimated blood loss (p <.001), and type of surgery (p = .005).

CONCLUSION

Multiple factors affect SDD. Modifiable factors for SDD include the start time, surgeon preference, and patient expectations for SDD. Given these data, centers should prioritize surgical order by which patients are more likely to go home, and surgeons should analyze their own data with respect to achieving higher SDD rates.

Long term resource consequences of a nationwide introduction of robotic surgery for women with early stage endometrial cancer

OBJECTIVE

The majority of cost-studies related to robotic surgery has a short follow-up and primarily report the costs from the index surgery. The aim of this study was to evaluate the long-term resource consequences of introducing robotic surgery for early stage endometrial cancer in Denmark.

METHODS

The study included all women with early stage endometrial cancer who underwent robotic, laparoscopic and open access surgery from January 2008 to June 2015. Data was linked from national databases to determine resource consumption and costs from hospital treatments, outpatient contacts, primary health care sector visits, labor market affiliation and prescription of medication. Each patient was observed in a period of 12 months before- and after surgery. The key exposure variable was women who were exposed to robotic surgery compared to those who were not.

RESULTS

A total of 4133 women underwent surgery for early stage endometrial cancer. The study found additional costs of $7309 (95% confidence interval [CI] 2100-11,620, P = 0.001) per patient in the group exposed to robotic surgery including long-term costs post-surgery compared to the non-exposed group (non-robotic group). When controlling for time trends, the introduction of robotic surgery did not reduce the number of bed days (mean diff -0.42, 95% CI -3.03-2.19, P = 0.752).

CONCLUSIONS

The introduction of robotic surgery for early stage endometrial cancer did not generate any long-term cost savings. The additional costs of robotic surgery were primarily driven by the index surgery. Any reduction in bed days could be explained by time trends.