Maternal disability and risk for pregnancy, delivery, and postpartum complications: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Pregnancy and postnatal outcomes for women with intellectual disability and their infants: A systematic review

BACKGROUND

While the perinatal period is a vulnerable time for women and their infants, it is also a window to promote adjustment and support. Women with intellectual disability might be a uniquely vulnerable group owing to pre-existing health and care inequalities. The aim of this paper is to explore the pregnancy and postnatal outcomes of women with intellectual disability and the health and development of their infants.

METHODS

Three electronic databases (MEDLINE, PsycINFO, EMBASE) were searched for peer-reviewed papers that reported maternal pregnancy variables and infant outcomes within the first 12 months of life. Two reviewers screened 103 full text articles, of which nine met eligibility criteria. Data reporting maternal health, pregnancy complications, labour variables, and birth and neonatal outcomes were extracted, and findings were summarised narratively.

FINDINGS

Women with intellectual disability were at an overall higher risk of adverse obstetric and pregnancy outcomes, such as urinary tract infection, gestational hypertension, and postpartum haemorrhage. Similarly, infants of women with intellectual disability had higher rates of premature birth, perinatal mortality, and experienced longer hospital stays when compared to their counterparts born to women without intellectual disability.

CONCLUSIONS

The relative sparsity of literature in this field demonstrates the need for further focused study on the pregnancy and postnatal outcomes of women with intellectual disability and their infants. Nonetheless, findings indicate that maternity services need to be further developed to provide optimum care for women with intellectual disability and to support infant development.

Perinatal mental health and risk of severe maternal morbidity in women with physical disabilities, Massachusetts 2003-2015

BACKGROUND

Perinatal mental health and substance use disorders contribute to adverse maternal outcomes. Women with disabilities experience increased risk for severe maternal morbidity (SMM). No studies have examined the association between perinatal mental health and SMM risk in women with physical disabilities.

OBJECTIVE

To examine the association between perinatal mental health and substance use disorders and SMM risk in women with physical disabilities.

METHODS

We analyzed delivery hospitalizations from 2003 to 2015 from the Massachusetts Pregnancy to Early Life Longitudinal (PELL) data system. We identified physical disability using International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision codes. Perinatal mental health status was based on the presence of at least one emergency department visit, observational, or in-patient stay attributed to a mental health or substance use disorder anytime from gestation to delivery. We used modified Poisson regressions to obtain risk ratios (RR) for SMM in women with either a physical disability or no disability by perinatal mental health status. Non-disabled women with no perinatal mental health or substance use disorder visit served as the referent group.

RESULTS

Deliveries in women with no physical disability and a perinatal mental health visit were not associated with risk of SMM. Compared to the referent group, women with a physical disability and a perinatal mental health or substance use disorder visit had greater risk of both SMM (RR = 1.84, 95 % CI:1.32-2.56), and nontransfusion SMM (RR = 2.35 1.52, 3.64), after adjusting for demographic and socioeconomic characteristics.

CONCLUSIONS

Increased attention should be paid to perinatal mental health status in women with physical disabilities.

Disability justice and collective access to labour and delivery care: a qualitative study

BACKGROUND

People with disabilities experience perinatal health disparities. This qualitative study examines disabled people's experiences of labour and delivery care from a disability justice lens.

METHODS

Semi-structured interviews were conducted between July 2019 and February 2020 with 31 women and transgender people aged 18-45 years with physical, sensory, and/or intellectual/developmental disabilities, who were living in in Ontario, Canada and had given birth in the previous five years.

RESULTS

People with disabilities described negative experiences of provider-driven, disrespectful, and discriminatory labour and delivery care that can be interpreted as examples of disability injustice and obstetric ableism. People with disabilities also described positive experiences of collaborative, respectful, and disability-affirming labour and delivery care that can be interpreted as examples of disability justice, facilitated by what feminist disability justice scholars and activists call collective access.

CONCLUSIONS

Collective access to labour and delivery care can improve perinatal health care for people with disabilities and promote disability justice. Reimagining care-related decision-making as an interdependent, collaborative, respectful, and disability-affirming process shared between patients and providers can help to facilitate collective access to labour and delivery care.

Severe Maternal Morbidity and Other Perinatal Complications Among Black, Hispanic, and White Birthing Persons With and Without Physical Disabilities

Background: People with physical disabilities are at increased risk of adverse perinatal outcomes, including severe maternal morbidity (SMM). Risks may be even greater for disabled people in minoritized racial or ethnic groups, but little is known about this intersection. Methods: We analyzed linked hospital discharge and vital records data from California, 2008-2020. We identified physical disabilities using diagnosis codes for maternal congenital anomalies, major injuries, musculoskeletal disorders, or nervous system disorders. We compared birthing persons in five groups (Black and Hispanic with and without physical disabilities, White with physical disabilities) to a reference group of non-Hispanic Whites without disabilities. We used Poisson regression to assess associations with SMM and other outcomes, with and without adjusting for sociodemographic and clinical covariates. Results: Disabled Black and Hispanic birthing persons had particularly high relative risks (RRs) of SMM (Black disabled RR = 6.13, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 4.94, 7.61; Hispanic disabled RR = 3.67, 95% CI: 3.29, 4.10) as compared with nondisabled White persons. These risks were greater than those for nondisabled Black (RR = 2.05, 95% CI: 1.99, 2.11), nondisabled Hispanic (RR = 1.36, 95% CI: 1.34, 1.39), and disabled White birthing persons (RR = 2.44, 95% CI: 2.16, 2.77). For most other outcomes, risks were also largest for disabled Black birthing persons, followed by disabled Hispanic birthing persons. Conclusions: Black and Hispanic people with physical disabilities are highly likely to experience SMM and are at increased risk for other complications and adverse outcomes. Efforts are needed to understand underlying causes of these disparities and develop policies and practices to eliminate them.

Changes in functional status during and after pregnancy in people with cerebral palsy: An international observational study

Background

There is limited information surrounding physical changes people with cerebral palsy (CP) experience during pregnancy.

Methodology

This is a subgroup analysis of an international online questionnaire, developed with input from individuals with CP. Data collection included demographics, baseline functional status, and functional status changes during pregnancy. Descriptive analysis was used.

Results

158 participants from 15 countries participated of which 30 had a total of 49 pregnancies resulting in birth. Worsened strength, spasticity, bladder function and fatigue occurred in 56.5% (13/23), 47.8% (11/23), 56.5% (13/23) and 87.0% (20/23) of participants. 9/23 (40.9%) required new mobility devices. Worsening of fatigue, strength, spasticity and need for a new mobility device was reported by all groups regardless of functional status.

Conclusions

People with CP may experience significant functional changes during pregnancy, even those who mobilized independently prior to pregnancy. These findings may inform obstetricians, nurses, neurologists and physiatrists, and contribute to preconception counselling.

Evaluating the factor structure of the pregnancy-related anxiety scale: implications for maternal and infant wellbeing

AIMS/BACKGROUND

Although the Pregnancy-Related Anxiety Scale - also referred to as the Pregnancy-Related Thoughts Scale (PRT) - is one of the most widely utilised measures of pregnancy-related anxiety (PrA), there is limited research exploring its factor structure and psychometric properties. The present study sought to (a) explore the factor structure of the PRT and (b) examine whether specific dimensions of PrA differentially predict postpartum outcomes.

DESIGN/METHODS

A community sample of pregnant women (N = 159) was recruited from a Midwestern city in the United States and completed the PRT alongside other self-report measures of stress and maternal health and mood during pregnancy. Participants also completed measures of maternal health and mood, as well as parenting/infant outcomes, at 1- and 6-months postpartum.

RESULTS

Results provided support for a bifactor model with two unique dimensions of the PRT capturing baby- and self-focused concerns, respectively. Maternal self-focused PrA uniquely predicted postpartum internalising problems (β = .22), worse physical health (β = -.27), and impaired mother-infant bonding (β = .19) when controlling for baby-focused and general PrA.

CONCLUSION

Findings highlight the utility of screening for specific dimensions of PrA to promote both maternal and infant wellbeing following childbirth. Specifically, evidence suggests that screening for self-focused PrA, above and beyond baby-focused PrA, might facilitate prevention and intervention efforts and allow researchers to better understand antecedents and consequences of unique facets of PrA.

Mental health outcomes across the reproductive life course among women with disabilities: a systematic review

PURPOSE

This systematic review examined literature on mental health outcomes among women with disabilities living in high-income countries within the context of reproductive health, spanning menstruation through menopause.

METHODS

Following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines, we searched MEDLINE, CINAHL, and PsycINFO databases for studies published through June 2023. Eligible studies were observational, quantitative, and included a comparison group without disabilities.

RESULTS

A total of 2,520 studies were evaluated and 27 studies met inclusion criteria. These studies assessed mental health during prepregnancy, pregnancy, postpartum, and parenting among women with and without disabilities. None of the studies examined reproductive health time periods related to menstruation, fertility, or menopause. Women of reproductive age with disabilities were more likely to have poor mental health outcomes compared to women without disabilities. During pregnancy and the postpartum, women with disabilities were at greater risk of diagnosed perinatal mental disorders and psychiatric-related healthcare visits. Findings also suggested mental distress and inadequate emotional and social support related to parenting among women with disabilities. The greatest risks of poor mental health outcomes were often observed among women with intellectual and developmental disabilities and among women with multiple types of disabilities, compared to women without disabilities.

CONCLUSIONS

Routine reproductive healthcare visits provide significant prevention and treatment opportunities for poor mental health among women with disabilities. Further research examining mental health outcomes within the context of reproductive health, especially understudied areas of menstruation, fertility, parenting, and menopause, among women with disabilities is needed.

Women with disabilities' use of maternal care services in sub-Saharan Africa

Background

Quality maternal health care is central to the Sustainable Development Goals efforts to reduce maternal mortality, yet there remain limited quantitative data on maternal care inequities for women with disabilities in sub-Saharan Africa.

Objectives

This study aims to understand the differences in maternal care providers for women with and without disabilities.

Method

We used Multiple Indicator Cluster Surveys from 13 sub-Saharan African countries conducted between 2017-2020. We used logistic and multinomial logistic regression to examine the relationship between disability (Washington Group definition) and antenatal care attendance and the type of care provider for antenatal care, skilled birth attendance, and postnatal and postpartum checks. All analyses were adjusted for age, wealth, country, and location.

Results

The sample included 10 021 women, including 306 (3.1%) women with disabilities. There were small absolute and no relative differences in antenatal care attendance, qualified antenatal care provider, postnatal, and postpartum checks, for disabled and women without disabilities. Women with disabilities had some evidence of higher odds of having a doctor at their birth compared to women without disabilities (aOR = 1.52, 95% CI: 0.99-2.33).

Conclusion

This study shows small absolute and no relative differences between women with and without disabilities for antenatal access and provider types for maternal care, though these findings are limited by a small sample and no data on care quality, acceptability, or outcomes. More research on care quality and outcomes is needed.

Contribution

This study is the first quantitative, multi-country study in sub-Saharan Africa to examine maternal care seeking patterns, demonstrating important data on maternal health indicators for women with disabilities.

Preconception health risks by presence and type of disability among U.S. women

BACKGROUND

Poor preconception health may contribute to adverse perinatal outcomes among women with disabilities. While prior research has found higher prevalence of preconception health risks among women with versus without disabilities, existing U.S. studies have not assessed how preconception health risks may differ by disability type. Understanding such differences is relevant for informing and targeting efforts to improve health opportunities and optimize pregnancy outcomes.

OBJECTIVE

This cross-sectional study examined preconception health in relation to disability type among reproductive-age women in the United States.

METHODS

We analyzed 2016-2019 data from the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System to estimate the prevalence of 19 preconception health risk among non-pregnant women 18-44 years of age. We used modified Poisson regression to compare women with different types of disability to non-disabled women. Disability categories included: 1) hearing difficulty only; 2) vision difficulty only; 3) physical/mobility difficulty only; 4) cognitive difficulty only; 5) multiple or complex disabilities (including limitations in self-care or independent living activities). Multivariable analyses adjusted for other sociodemographic characteristics such as age and marital status.

RESULTS

Women with each disability type experienced a higher prevalence of indicators associated with poor preconception health compared to women with no disabilities. The number and extent of health risks varied substantially by disability type. Women with cognitive disabilities and women with multiple or complex disabilities experienced the greatest risk.

CONCLUSIONS

Addressing the specific preconception health risks experienced by women with different types of disabilities may help reduce adverse perinatal outcomes for disabled women and their infants.

Implementing and evaluating resources to support good maternity care for parents with learning disabilities: A qualitative feasibility study in England

PROBLEM

Parents with learning disabilities are often disadvantaged and their needs not well understood in maternity services.

BACKGROUND

Despite a global vision to improve maternity care, current evidence confirms poor pre- and post-natal care for parents with learning disabilities and their families. Midwives have expressed a need for support in the delivery of good care to this population of parents.

AIM

To test the feasibility of implementing and evaluating two evidence-based and values-based resources - the Together Toolkit and Maternity Passport - to support good maternity care for people with learning disabilities.

METHODS

A qualitative feasibility study employing semi-structured interviews with 17 midwives and 6 parents who had used the resources in practice in four NHS Trusts in the south of England.

FINDINGS

Midwives and parents described how the resources positively impacted maternity care by enabling midwives, connecting networks and empowering parents. Factors affecting effective implementation of the resources were reported at an individual and setting level.

DISCUSSION

Staff training to raise awareness and confidence in supporting parents with learning disabilities, and improved systems for recording parent's individual needs are required to enable the delivery of personalised care.

CONCLUSION

Reasonable adjustments need to be prioritised to facilitate implementation of resources to support personalised maternity care and to address inequity for parents with learning disabilities. Aspirations for equity suggested commitment from midwives to challenge and overcome barriers to implementation. Recommendations were made to improve the resources and their implementation. These resources are free and accessible for use [www.surrey.ac.uk/togetherproject].

Preconception health disparities among reproductive-aged women with and without disabilities in Canada

OBJECTIVES

Preconception health (PCH), which describes the health status of reproductive-aged individuals, can influence reproductive, maternal, and fetal/neonatal outcomes. PCH disparities have been observed in certain populations, prompting the development of tailored resources. Our objective was to compare the PCH characteristics of women with and without disabilities.

METHODS

We undertook a secondary analysis of the 2003-2014 cycles of the Canadian Community Health Survey (CCHS), which included n = 115,295 women aged 15-49 years. Among these, we also examined a sub-sample of n = 12,495 women with a subsequent obstetrical delivery identified in a linkage of the CCHS with the Discharge Abstract Database (DAD, 2003-2017). The outcomes were 8 PCH indicators. We used modified Poisson regression to estimate adjusted prevalence ratios (aPRs) for each PCH indicator, comparing women with and without disabilities, and multinomial logistic regression to calculate adjusted odds ratios for 1, 2, and ≥ 3 PCH indicators (vs. 0). Analyses were adjusted for baseline demographics.

RESULTS

Reproductive-aged women with disabilities had significantly increased aPRs of smoking (1.42 [95% CI:1.37-1.48]), obesity (1.57 [1.48-1.65]), and self-reported fair/poor physical (5.56 [5.09-6.07]) and mental health (4.07 [3.71-4.47]), compared to those without disabilities. They were also more likely to have ≥ 3, 2, and 1 PCH indicators (vs. 0). Findings were similar in the sub-sample with a subsequent obstetrical delivery.

CONCLUSION

Canadian reproductive-aged women with disabilities experience important PCH disparities. Further research is needed to inform tailored education and resources to support PCH in individuals with disabilities, in combination with policies to address structural barriers to PCH.

Building disability-inclusive health systems

Health systems often fail people with disabilities, which might contribute to their shorter life expectancy and poorer health outcomes than people without disabilities. This Review provides an overview of the existing evidence on health inequities faced by people with disabilities and describes existing approaches to making health systems disability inclusive. Our Review documents a broad range of health-care inequities for people with disabilities (eg, lower levels of cancer screening), which probably contribute towards health differentials. We identified 90 good practice examples that illustrate current strategies to reduce inequalities. Implementing such strategies could help to ensure that health systems can expect, accept, and connect people with disabilities worldwide, deliver on their right to health, and achieve health for all.

Pre-Pregnancy Health Risks by Presence and Extent of Disability, 2019-2020

INTRODUCTION

Prior studies have shown that, compared to non-disabled women, women with disabilities have a higher burden of preconception mental and physical health risks that are associated with adverse pregnancy outcomes. This cross-sectional study assesses how the extent of disability relates to pre-pregnancy health risks.

METHODS

This study used 2019-2020 PRAMS data from 22 sites that included the Washington Group Short Set of Questions on Disability (n=37,006). In 2023, associations between extent of disability (none [reference group], some difficulty, or a lot of difficulty) and preconception health risks were examined using multivariable Poisson regression with robust standard errors to calculate adjusted prevalence ratios (aPRs) and 95% CIs while controlling for sociodemographic characteristics. Preconception health risks included smoking, heavy drinking, high blood pressure, diabetes, no multivitamin use, and experiencing physical abuse, depression, or obesity. Individual risks were analyzed, as well as the total number of risks experienced.

RESULTS

Of respondents, 33.6% had some difficulty and 6.3% had a lot of difficulty. The likelihood of experiencing preconception health risks increased with extent of disability. Compared to respondents with no difficulty, those with some or a lot of difficulty had a higher prevalence of experiencing 1-2 health risks (aPR=1.13, 95% CI 1.09, 1.18; aPR=1.20; 95% CI 1.53, 2.25) and 3+ health risks (aPR=1.86, 95% CI 1.53, 2.25; aPR=2.42, 95% CI 1.98, 2.97), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Disabled women, especially those with more difficulty, are vulnerable to preconception health risks that could potentially be mitigated before conception. These findings highlight the need for enhanced efforts to support preconception health of disabled women.

Perinatal health framework for people with intellectual disability

We propose a framework for guiding research on perinatal health in people with intellectual disability (ID). We developed this framework based on the perinatal health framework for people with physical disabilities, American Association on Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities conceptual framework of human functioning, disability reproductive justice framework, trauma-informed care, and socio-ecological model. The framework reflects health outcomes of birthing people with ID and their infants that result from interactions of factors across the life course at policy (health, social, and disability policies), community (attitudes, social and physical environment), institutional (health care delivery-related factors, access to information/resources), interpersonal (social determinants of health/histories of trauma, social support, interactions with service-providers), and individual levels (demographics, intellectual functioning, adaptive behavior, health conditions, genetic factors, psychosocial factors, health behaviors). This framework will facilitate research to identify factors leading to perinatal health disparities in people with ID and development and evaluation of resources to address them.

Reproductive justice for disabled people post-Dobbs: A call-to-action for researchers

The recent Supreme Court ruling in Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization endangers reproductive freedom, particularly for marginalized communities, including disabled people. Disability and health equity researchers possess unique insights into the needs and experiences of disabled people, making our involvement crucial in response to the Dobbs decision. Accordingly, guided by disability justice and reproductive justice principles, researchers should undertake disability-inclusive studies on the consequences of abortion restrictions, advocate for policy changes that uphold the reproductive autonomy of disabled people, and collaborate with disability-led movements advocating for reproductive freedom. Indeed, it is imperative for researchers to actively promote the inclusion and self-determination of disabled people regarding their reproductive health and well-being. Given the escalating threats to reproductive freedom and their profound impact on disabled people, there has never been a more pivotal moment for disability and health equity researchers to join the fight for reproductive justice.

Experiences of women with physical disabilities in labor and delivery assistance

OBJECTIVE

To understand the meaning attributed by women with physical disabilities to the health care received and expected during labor and delivery.

METHODS

Qualitative study, based on Social Network Theory, conducted through an online workshop in April 2022, with the participation of six women with physical disabilities. Data, collected through the focus group technique, underwent thematic content analysis with the assistance of the IRaMuTeQ tool.

RESULTS

Three thematic categories emerged: Challenges experienced during pregnancy; The experience within the maternity ward; and, The importance of social networks. The assistance provided by healthcare professionals sometimes differed between what was expected and what was received by women with physical disabilities during labor and delivery.

FINAL CONSIDERATIONS

Experiences were predominantly negative, resulting from inappropriate professional conduct due to ableist attitudes. Support from members of social networks is crucial for preventing stressors.

Perinatal healthcare for women at risk of children's social care involvement: a qualitative survey of professionals in England

BACKGROUND

Women with complex health needs are more at risk of having children's social care involvement with their newborns than other mothers. Around the time of pregnancy, there are opportunities for health services to support women with these needs and mitigate the risk of mother-baby separation. Yet little is known about healthcare professionals' experiences of providing this support.

METHODS

We administered an online survey to perinatal healthcare professionals across England (n=70 responders), including midwives, obstetricians, perinatal psychologists/psychiatrists and health visitors. We asked about their experiences of providing care for pregnant women with chronic physical conditions, mental health needs, intellectual/developmental disabilities and substance use disorders, who might be at risk of children's social care involvement. We conducted a framework analysis.

RESULTS

We constructed five themes from participant data. These include (1) inaccessible healthcare for women with complex needs, (2) the challenges and importance of restoring trust, (3) services focusing on individuals, not families, (4) the necessity and caution around multidisciplinary support and (5) underfunded services inhibiting good practice.

CONCLUSIONS

Women who are at risk of children's social care involvement will likely experience perinatal healthcare inequities. Our findings suggest that current perinatal healthcare provision for this population is inadequate and national guidelines need updated to inform support.

Pregnancy characteristics and outcomes among birthing individuals with a diagnosis of fetal alcohol syndrome

BACKGROUND

Fetal alcohol syndrome (FAS) can have adverse effects on health outcomes throughout the life course. Adults with FAS have an increased risk of chronic and infectious diseases. Although these conditions can affect reproductive health, few have described perinatal outcomes among individuals with an FAS diagnosis.

METHODS

We analyzed data from the Study of Mothers and Infants, an administrative birth cohort derived from California birth certificates linked with a hospital discharge database. The cohort consisted of 7.3 million singleton, live births between 2005 and 2021. FAS was identified by International Classification of Diseases (ICD) codes in maternal hospital discharge records. Pregnancy and birth outcomes were captured via ICD codes in maternal or infant records. We performed descriptive analyses for pregnancy and birth outcomes by maternal FAS diagnosis.

RESULTS

There were 35 babies born to 30 individuals with an FAS diagnosis between 2005 and 2021 (0.5/100,000 live births). The prevalence of births to individuals with an FAS diagnosis increased over the period. Individuals with an FAS diagnosis were more likely to identify as non-Hispanic White, or "other/multiple" race, and less likely to be Hispanic than those without FAS. They were also more likely to be publicly insured and less than 18 years old. Birthing individuals with FAS were also more likely to use nicotine during pregnancy and to have diagnoses of mental health disorders, epilepsy, substance use disorders, preexisting or gestational hypertension, and sexually transmitted infections or other infections complicating pregnancy. Infants of individuals with FAS were more likely to be born prematurely or small for gestational age and be admitted to the neonatal intensive care unit.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings highlight the need for improved recognition of FAS among birthing people. The results suggest that individuals with FAS would benefit from early and sustained medical care prior to pregnancy to optimize perinatal outcomes.

Functional Disabilities and Food Insufficiency During Pregnancy: Results from the Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System

Background: Disability is a well-documented risk factor for food insecurity. However, prior literature has overlooked the possible connection between disability and food insecurity during the antenatal period. This study extends previous research by examining the relationship between those with any functional disabilities and food insufficiency during pregnancy among a sample of mothers. Methods: Data are from the Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System, 2019-2020 (N = 9084). The relationship between the number of self-reported functional disabilities and food insufficiency is examined using modified multivariable Poisson regression. Results: After adjusting for control variables, the results reveal that those with any functional disability have a significantly higher risk of food insufficiency during pregnancy (risk ratio [RR] = 1.464, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.201-1.785). Findings reveal that all types of functional disability are associated with a higher risk of food insufficiency, including difficulty seeing, difficulty hearing, difficulty walking, difficulty remembering, difficulty with self-care, and difficulty communicating. Finally, the findings revealed that respondents with two functional disabilities (RR = 1.473, 95% CI = 1.153-1.882) and three or more functional disabilities (RR = 1.974, 95% CI = 1.534-2.541) are significantly more likely to report food insufficiency compared with respondents with no disabilities. Conclusions: There is a significant positive association between reporting functional disabilities and food insufficiency. Expanding current public health programs, educating health care professionals, and implementing effective screening guidelines directed at pregnant women with disabilities may reduce the prevalence of food insufficiency and promote greater health equity.

Maternal Autistic Traits and Adverse Birth Outcomes

Importance

Women with a high level of autistic traits in the general population may experience larger health disparities during pregnancy, particularly women diagnosed with autism spectrum disorder (ASD), which in turn may be associated with increased risk of adverse birth outcomes.

Objective

To investigate the association between maternal autistic traits and the risk of adverse birth outcomes in the general population.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This cohort study included mothers of singletons from a nationwide, multicenter prospective birth cohort, the Japan Environmental Children's Study. Expecting mothers were recruited between January 2011 and March 2014. Data were analyzed between June 2021 and November 2023.

Exposures

Autistic traits were self-reported during the second and third trimesters using the short form of the Autism-Spectrum Quotient Japanese version (AQ-J10) (score range, 0-10; clinical range, ≥7).

Main Outcomes and Measures

Data on preterm birth (<37 weeks' gestation) and neonates born small for gestational age (SGA) were transcribed from medical records. Additional analysis of gestational age groups (very preterm birth, <32 weeks' gestation; moderate-to-late preterm birth, 32-36 weeks' gestation) was also performed.

Results

Among 87 687 women (mean [SD] age, 31.2 [5.0] years) included in the study, 2350 (2.7%) had AQ-J10 scores within the clinical range yet only 18 (0.02%) were diagnosed with ASD. A higher AQ-J10 score was associated with an increased risk of all birth outcomes, including preterm births (relative risk [RR] per 1-SD increase, 1.06; 95% CI, 1.03-1.09), moderate-to-late preterm births (RR per 1-SD increase, 1.05; 95% CI, 1.01-1.08), very preterm births (RR per 1-SD increase, 1.16; 95% CI, 1.06-1.26), and child born SGA (RR per 1-SD increase, 1.04; 95% CI, 1.01-1.06) after adjusting for maternal and pregnancy-related factors. The risks of all outcomes increased with higher AQ-J10 scores; compared with women below the clinical range, women within the clinical range had greater risk of preterm births (RR, 1.16; 95% CI, 1.07-1.26), moderate-to-late preterm births (RR, 1.12; 95% CI, 1.03-1.22), very preterm births (RR, 1.49; 95% CI, 1.18-1.89), and a child born SGA (RR, 1.11; 95% CI, 1.04-1.19).

Conclusions and Relevance

In this cohort study, higher level of maternal autistic traits was associated with increased risk of adverse birth outcomes, particularly very preterm birth. Acknowledging the risks and providing tailored and timely antenatal care support to women with a high level of autistic traits in the general population, particularly women with autistic traits within the clinical range, regardless of formal diagnosis, is warranted.

Maternal disability and initiation and duration of breastfeeding: analysis of a Canadian cross-sectional survey

BACKGROUND

The World Health Organization recommends breastfeeding as the best method for infant feeding. Known risk factors for breastfeeding non-initiation and early cessation of breastfeeding are diverse and include low breastfeeding self-efficacy, poverty, smoking, obesity, and chronic illness. Although women with disabilities experience elevated rates of these risk factors, few studies have examined their breastfeeding outcomes. Our objective was to examine breastfeeding non-initiation and early cessation of breastfeeding in women with and without disabilities.

METHODS

We used data from the 2017-2018 Canadian Community Health Survey. Included were n = 4,817 women aged 15-55 years who had a birth in the last five years, of whom 26.6% had a disability, ascertained using the Washington Group Short Set on Functioning. Prevalence ratios (aPR) of breastfeeding non-initiation, and of early cessation of any and exclusive breastfeeding before 6 months, were calculated for women with versus without disabilities. We also examined disability by severity (moderate/severe and mild, separately) and number of action domains impacted (≥ 2 and 1, separately). The main multivariable models were adjusted for maternal age, marital status, level of education, annual household income level, and immigrant status.

RESULTS

There were no differences between women with and without disabilities in breastfeeding non-initiation (9.6% vs. 8.9%; aPR 0.88, 95% CI 0.63, 1.23). Women with disabilities were more likely to have early cessation of any (44.4% vs. 35.7%) and exclusive breastfeeding before 6 months (66.9% vs. 61.3%), with some attenuation in risk after adjustment for sociodemographic factors (aRR 1.15, 95% CI 0.99, 1.33 and aRR 1.07, 95% 0.98, 1.16, respectively). Disparities were larger for women with moderate/severe disabilities and disabilities in ≥ 2 domains, with differences attenuated by adjustment for socio-demographics.

CONCLUSIONS

Women with disabilities, and particularly those with moderate/severe and multiple disabilities, could benefit from tailored, accessible breastfeeding supports that attend to the social determinants of health.

Reproductive health of women with intellectual disability: antenatal care, pregnancies and outcomes in the Dutch population

BACKGROUND

Research in a handful of countries found that women with intellectual disability (ID) faced barriers and risks regarding antenatal care and reproductive health. This study tested disparities between women in the Netherlands with and without ID in antenatal care, pregnancy rates and pregnancy outcomes.

METHODS

Secondary analyses on the large representative panel of primary health patients in the Netherlands by the Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research (NIVEL) compared women in their reproductive age (18-49 years) with (n = 2397) and without (n = 228 608) indicators of ID. Bias due to underreporting and under-identification was reduced by linkage with an index of ID for the total Dutch population from Statistical Netherlands.

RESULTS

Women with ID were more likely to receive contraceptive care [95% confidence interval (CI) for odds ratio (OR) = 1.37-1.61] and became somewhat more often pregnant (95% CI OR = 1.06-2.30) than women from the general population, adjusting for age difference and follow-up time. No statistical differences were found in medical complications during pregnancy, delivery and immediately after birth, but women with indicators of ID had a higher risk of losing their pregnancy, including through induced abortion (95% CI OR = 1.26-1.99).

CONCLUSIONS

Women with ID have specific needs around contraceptive care and risks around their pregnancy that may require more awareness among practitioners and better understanding of the processes of care and decision-making.

Maternal Health Experiences of Black Deaf and Hard of Hearing Women in the United States

INTRODUCTION

Deaf and hard of hearing (DHH) women are faced with numerous health inequities, including adverse pregnancy and birth outcomes. These outcomes are likely exacerbated for Black DHH women because of the intersection of disability and race. This study aimed to explore the pregnancy and birth experiences of Black DHH women to identify factors that influence their pregnancy outcomes.

METHODS

Semistructured interviews were conducted between 2018 and 2019 with 67 DHH women who gave birth in the past five years. The present study represents a subgroup analysis of eight of the 67 women who self-identified as Black. Interviews were recorded, transcribed, and analyzed for emerging themes.

RESULTS

Primary themes centered on unmet needs, barriers, and facilitators. Barriers included limited access to health information owing to communication difficulties and challenges obtaining accommodations. Key facilitators included the availability of sign language interpreters, familial support, and cultural understanding from providers. Participants emphasized these facilitators in their recommendations to providers and DHH women. Findings also underscored the critical role of recognizing cultural identity in perinatal health care delivery.

CONCLUSIONS

This study outlines themes that affect pregnancy and birthing experiences among Black DHH women in the United States. Study implications include a call to action for providers to prioritize communication accommodations, accessible information, and compassionate care for all Black DHH women. Furthermore, future work should explore the impact of cultural and racial concordance between patients and their health care providers and staff. Understanding how intersectional identities affect perinatal health care access is crucial for reducing disparities among Black DHH women.

Experiences of women with impaired physical mobility during pregnancy, childbirth and postpartum: A case study

INTRODUCTION

The research deals with a little-studied topic in Estonia: the experiences of women with impaired physical mobility (IPM) during pregnancy, childbirth, and in the postpartum period. Women with IPM, a vulnerable group, have a higher risk of complications and a higher probability of missing out on comprehensive maternity care.

METHODS

The method of the present research is qualitative. It is a case study of three women with IPM with whom semi-structured interviews were conducted.

RESULTS

It was found that women with IPM encountered several obstacles and problems during pregnancy, childbirth, and the postpartum period; despite this, women's experiences with maternity care were mostly positive. Furthermore, there are several areas for improvement to ensure more comprehensive maternity care. Women with IPM need more support and help, and midwives are expected to have additional knowledge regarding the specifics or limitations resulting from mobility impairments.

CONCLUSIONS

In the future, the topic needs greater attention and improvement in the Estonian context to ensure more comprehensive maternity care for women with IPM. It is important to provide midwives the knowledge and skills to assist women with IPM during pregnancy, childbirth, and the postpartum period.

Pregnancy Outcomes in Canadian Women With Disabilities: Results From Linked Survey and Health Administrative Data

We compared maternal, labour/delivery, and birth outcomes in women with versus without disabilities using a linkage of 2003-2014 Canadian Community Health Survey (CCHS) and 2003-2017 Discharge Abstract Database data. Modified Poisson regression was used to compare 15-49-year-old women with (n = 2430) and without (n = 10 375) disabilities with a singleton birth ≤5 years after their CCHS interview. Women with disabilities were at elevated risk of prenatal hospitalization (10.3% vs. 6.6%; adjusted prevalence ratio 1.33, 95% CI 1.03-1.72). They were also at elevated risk of preterm birth (8.7% vs. 6.2%), but this was attenuated after adjustment. Women with disabilities could benefit from tailored prenatal care.

Unmet needs, limited access: A qualitative study of postpartum health care experiences of people with disabilities

AIM

To understand the postpartum care received by birthing people with disabilities and their newborns, from their own perspectives.

DESIGN

A qualitative study with semi-structured interviews.

METHODS

Between July 2019 and February 2020, in-person and virtual interviews were conducted with 31 people with physical, sensory, and intellectual/developmental disabilities in Ontario, Canada, about the formal inpatient and outpatient services and supports they used in the first few months after they gave birth. Thematic analysis was used identify common themes.

RESULTS

We identified three overall themes concerning participants' postpartum care experiences and the different types of formal services received in and out of hospital: (1) lack of adequate care, (2) lack of provider awareness of disability and disability accommodations, and (3) fear of judgement, discrimination, and intrusive surveillance. The identified themes were applicable across disability groups. However, most comments on disability accommodations came from participants with physical or sensory disabilities, while participants with intellectual/developmental disabilities most commonly reported concerns about lack of adequate care and fear of judgement, discrimination, and intrusive surveillance.

CONCLUSION

Findings indicate that postpartum care often fails people with disabilities. This could contribute to negative health consequences for them and their newborns.

IMPACT

Birthing people with disabilities need multidisciplinary, proactive, and strengths-based postpartum care to mitigate risk for health complications. Further, disability-related training and guidelines for health and social service providers is required.

REPORTING METHOD

Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ).

PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION

Our research team included two peer researchers with physical disabilities who served as co-interviewers and participated in data analysis, contributing their lived experience of disability and interactions with the health care system. All stages of the study were also informed by feedback from the study's Advisory Committee, which comprised women with disabilities (many of whom are parents), disability organization staff, clinicians, and policy representatives.

Disability prevalent conditions in women

Women and men can have the same illnesses, but with different prevalence and reactions to symptoms.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to emphasize that distinct traits between men and women require a different approach for each of them.

METHODS

PubMed and Google Scholar were searched using the following terms: Disability Evaluations, Women's health, Osteoporosis, Osteoarthritis, and Lymphedema, Pregnancy.

RESULTS/CONCLUSION

Disease management can go beyond the symptoms, assessing the long-term consequences and possibly the disabilities they can generate, compromising the quality of life of the person, his/her family members, and eventually caregivers.

Exploring disability prevalence among childbearing women attending a tertiary maternity service in Melbourne, Australia using an audit and cross-sectional survey

BACKGROUND

Although there is an estimated rate of 10% of women of childbearing age in Australia who have a disability, there is a lack of accurate prevalence data, with the true rate unknown. The timing and questions used to collect women's disability status in pregnancy vary, and there is limited knowledge on how women accessing maternity services in Australia would like to be asked about their disability status.

OBJECTIVE

To explore the prevalence of women with a disability receiving maternity care using a direct and indirect disability identification question. Secondary aims were to explore how women would like to be asked about their disability status and to examine the difference between self-reported and clinician-documented disability status within medical records.

RESEARCH DESIGN/SETTING

The study was conducted at a tertiary maternity hospital in Melbourne, Australia, and included two components. Component one used a cross-sectional survey with two different cohorts of women administered face-to-face on the postnatal ward (Cohort 1 - February 2019, Cohort 2 - December 2019). In Cohort 1, a specific disability identification question asked: 'Can you please tell me if you identify as someone who has a disability?'. In Cohort 2, an indirect disability identification question asked: 'Do you require additional assistance or support?'. Other questions explored women's views on disability identification. Component two consisted of an audit of the medical records to compare disability documentation in the medical records of the women who participated with women's disability self-identification status.

RESULTS

371/467 (79%) of eligible women that were approached participated in Cohort 1 and in Cohort 2, 295/346 (85%) of eligible women that were approached participated in the study. In Cohort 1, 5% (17/371) of women self-identified with having a disability. In Cohort 2 16% (46/295) of women reported needing additional assistance/support, however of these, only nine women viewed this as a disability. In Cohort 1, of the women who self-identified as having a disability, 82% had this recorded in their medical record. An additional 12% (43/354) of women in Cohort 1 who may have had a disability according to the Australian Bureau of Statistics classification, did not self-identify as having a disability. In Cohort 2, 37% (17/43) of women who self-identified as needing additional support did not have these needs documented in the medical record. Less than a quarter of women in both cohorts were asked about their disability status during their maternity care. Women with a disability or additional support needs suggested both direct and indirect ways of being asked about their disability status, and their responses were similar to women who did not self-identify with having a disability or additional support needs.

CONCLUSIONS

Disability prevalence data is highly dependant on the wording of the disability identification question. It may be appropriate to ask about disability both indirectly, in terms of additional support needs, and directly, to enable disclosure for those who do identify with a disability. Disability questioning should be routine and standardised guidelines around disability identification should be developed to allow for tailored adjustments to care on an individual level.

The disability-related education and training experiences of perinatal care providers in Ontario

We describe the disability-related education and training experiences of perinatal care providers in Ontario. Twenty perinatal care providers (e.g., obstetricians, midwives) participated in semi-structured interviews. Using a content analysis approach, we found most acquired disability-related training through their own initiative as opposed to education through professional training programs. Barriers to training included lack of data on disability and pregnancy, and limited experiential learning opportunities. Providers recommended that future training focus on experiential learning and social determinants of health, with people with disabilities involved in developing and delivering training. These efforts are vital to optimize pregnancy outcomes for people with disabilities.

Prevalence and factors associated with sexual and reproductive health services use among reproductive age women with disabilities: a community based cross-sectional study

BACKGROUND

According to International Convention on the Right of Person with Disabilities (CRPD), all nations should discern Sexual and Reproductive Health (SRH) as human rights and needs of all people living with disabilities. Women and girls with disabilities are highly vulnerable to SRH disparities including unintended pregnancy, acquiring sexual transmitted infections and unsafe abortion. Little has known about SRH service uptake and influencing factors among reproductive aged women living with disabilities.

METHODS

A community-based cross-sectional study was conducted from January 1-30, 2021, the central Gondar zone selected districts. A total of 535 reproductive-age (18-49 years) women with disabilities had been interviewed through face-to-face using structured questionnaire. Multistage cluster sampling method was applied. A binary logistic regression model was computed to look the relationship between independent variables and uptake of SRH, and p-value < 0.05 was a cut-off point to declare statistical significance.

RESULTS

A total of 33.27% (178/535) women with disabilities used at least one SRH service in the last twelve months preceding the survey. Those who had three or more children [AOR = 4.85; 95% CI (1.24-9.71)], autonomy to visit health care facilities [AOR = 3.30; 95% CI (1.45-6.92)], lived with sexual partner [AOR = 9.2; 95% CI (2.84-13.60)], subjected to radio/television in daily bases [AOR = 5.9; 95% CI (1.26-13.04)], autonomy to visit friends and relatives [AOR = 3.95; 95% CI (1.28-12.17)], had a discussion with family members about sexual and reproductive health [AOR = 9.36; 95% CI (3.44-17.47)], and engaged in sexual activity after the age of 18 years [AOR = 7.2; 95% CI (2.51-14.45)] were important predictors for service uptake.

CONCLUSIONS

Only one in three reproductive age women with disabilities used at least one SRH service. These findings suggest that accessing information through mainstream media exposure, having full autonomous to visit friends and families, open discussion with family members, live with sexual partner, having optimal family size and starting sexual act at the recommended age improve the uptake of SRH services. Therefore, the stakeholders (both governmental and non-governmental) need to make efforts to increase the uptake of SRH services.

Impact of social-, health-, and disability-related factors on pregnancy outcomes in women with intellectual and developmental disabilities: A population-based latent class analysis

BACKGROUND

Studies have shown women with intellectual and developmental disabilities (IDD) have elevated risks of perinatal complications, but few studies have examined how social, health, and disability-related factors affect these risks.

OBJECTIVES

To identify and describe subgroups of pregnant women with IDD according to social, health, and disability-related factors and examine the risks of perinatal complications in these subgroups compared to women without IDD.

METHODS

We performed a population-based cohort study in Ontario, Canada, of women with (n = 1922) and without (n = 1,126,854) IDD, with a singleton birth in 2003-2018. We used latent class analysis (LCA) to identify subgroups of women according to social (e.g., age), health (e.g., chronic medical conditions), and disability-related (e.g., IDD type) characteristics. Modified Poisson regression was then used to compare the risks of hypertensive disorders of pregnancy, cesarean delivery, and preterm birth across identified subgroups to women without IDD.

RESULTS

The LCA identified 4 classes of women with IDD: (1) young women who were mostly healthy and had little primary care before pregnancy (n = 253); (2) older women who were mostly healthy (n = 795); (3) young to mid-aged women who had significant comorbidities (n = 181); and (4) young women, many of whom were autistic, who had some medical comorbidities and significant psychiatric comorbidities (n = 693). Class 3 consistently had the greatest risks of perinatal complications, across all IDD groups, compared to women without IDD.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings underscore the importance of multidisciplinary care approaches tailored to the needs of at-risk women with IDD, in the preconception and perinatal periods.

Prenatal Care Experiences of Childbearing People With Disabilities in Ontario, Canada

OBJECTIVE

To explore the care experiences of childbearing people with physical, sensory, and/or intellectual/developmental disabilities during pregnancy.

DESIGN

Descriptive qualitative.

SETTING

Ontario, Canada, where physician and midwifery care during pregnancy are provided at no direct cost to residents.

PARTICIPANTS

Thirty-one people with physical, sensory, and/or intellectual/developmental disabilities (who self-identified as cisgender women [n = 29] and trans or nonbinary persons [n = 2]) who gave birth in the last 5 years.

METHODS

We recruited childbearing people with disabilities through disability and parenting organizations, social media, and our team's networks. Using a semistructured guide, we conducted in-person and virtual (e.g., telephone or Zoom) interviews with childbearing people with disabilities in 2019 to 2020. We asked participants about the services they accessed during pregnancy and if services met their needs. We used a reflexive thematic analysis approach to analyze interview data.

RESULTS

Across disability groups, we identified four common themes: Unmet Accommodation Needs, Lack of Coordinated Care, Ableism, and Advocacy as a Critical Resource. We found that these experiences manifested in unique ways based on disability type.

CONCLUSION

Our findings suggest the need for accessible, coordinated, and respectful prenatal care for people with disabilities, with the requirements of such care depending on the needs of the individual person with a disability. Nurses can play a key role in identifying the needs and supporting people with disabilities during pregnancy. Education and training for nurses, midwives, obstetricians, and other prenatal care providers should focus on disability-related knowledge and respectful prenatal care.

Stressful Life Events, Postpartum Depressive Symptoms, and Partner and Social Support Among Pregnant People with Disabilities

INTRODUCTION

As an increasing number of people with disabilities become pregnant and give birth, understanding their vulnerabilities for poor mental health and life stress can help to improve their health and well-being. We examined whether people with disabilities are more likely to experience stressful life events 12 months before childbirth, postpartum depressive symptoms (PDS), and lack of postpartum partner and social support, and compared these associations by race/ethnicity.

METHODS

Using the Massachusetts Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System 2016-2020 data (n = 6,483), we used univariate and multivariable logistic regression models to estimate the associations of disability with stressful life events, PDS, and postpartum partner and social support, and calculated risk ratio (RR), adjusted RR, and 95% confidence interval (CI). We also conducted stratified analyses by race/ethnicity.

RESULTS

The prevalence of disability was 10.7% overall, and 8.8% among White non-Hispanic people, 14.3% among Black non-Hispanic people, 15.5% among Hispanic people, and 8.3% among Asian non-Hispanic people. Compared with people without disabilities, those with disabilities were more likely to report emotional stress (RR, 1.54; 95% CI, 1.36-1.74), partner-related stress (RR, 2.55; 95% CI, 2.23-2.91), financial stress (RR, 1.55; 95% CI, 1.44-1.68), traumatic stress (RR, 2.27; 95% CI, 1.85-2.79), and PDS (RR, 3.77; 95% CI, 3.13-4.53). People with disabilities were also more likely to lack a partner's emotional support (RR, 2.57; 95% CI, 2.21-2.97), financial support from the newborn's father (RR, 2.89; 95% CI, 2.39-3.51), and social support while feeling tired or frustrated (RR, 2.05; 95% CI, 1.68-2.52). These associations remained statistically significant after adjustment for maternal factors and newborn's birth year. Strong associations of disability with stressful life events (including emotional stress and partner-related stress), PDS, lacking partner's emotional support, and social support existed across racial/ethnic groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Pregnant people with disabilities may benefit from additional screening for stressful life events and depression during pregnancy and postpartum. Multidisciplinary efforts that combine mental health screening and treatment, peer support groups, increased health care provider training about caring for people with disabilities during pregnancy, and better access to care for pregnant people with disabilities are needed to improve their health and support their desire to become parents.

VTE prophylaxis in pregnant people with chronic physical disability: Data from a physicians survey and the need for guidance

Background

International guidelines recommend risk assessment during the antepartum and postpartum period to inform VTE prophylaxis. We aimed to evaluate physicians' approach to VTE prophylaxis of women with chronic physical disability (CPD) during pregnancy.

Methods

A cross-sectional study consisting of a self-administered electronic questionnaire was sent to specialists across Canada.

Results

Seventy-three participants responded to the survey, and 55 (75.3%) completed the survey including 33 (60%) Maternal Fetal Medicine (MFM) specialists and 22 (40%) Internal Medicine (IM) specialists including physicians with an interest in Obstetric Medicine. Our study shows considerable variation in VTE thromboprophylaxis during pregnancy with CPD. Most respondents favoured antepartum (67.3%) and postpartum (65.5%) VTE prophylaxis for pregnancies within a year of spinal cord injury.

Conclusions

In order to better manage this complex population, CPD should be considered as a risk factor for development of VTE.

Trends in perinatal outcomes of women with chronic medical conditions: A 10-year population-based study in the Netherlands

OBJECTIVE

To gain insight into perinatal outcomes in women with chronic medical conditions, in order to contribute to the optimization of personalized perinatal care. We hypothesize that women with a chronic medical condition have poorer perinatal outcomes than women without a known chronic medical condition.

DESIGN

Population-based study using data of the Netherlands Perinatal Registry between 2010-2019.

SETTING

Nationwide study in the Netherlands.

PARTICIPANTS

Pregnancies of women who were diagnosed with chronic medical conditions by a medical specialist before pregnancy (n=36,835), divided into seven sub-groups and a reference group of pregnancies of women without known chronic medical conditions (n=1,084,623).

MEASUREMENTS AND FINDINGS

The primary outcome measure was mode of birth. Secondary outcomes measures were onset of labour, preterm birth, asphyxia, Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU) admission, and perinatal mortality. Spontaneous birth ranged from 45.0% (orthopaedic conditions) to 71.3% (neurological conditions) to 82.6% in the reference group. Assisted vaginal birth, planned caesarean birth, and emergency caesarean birth occurred significantly more in all groups compared to the reference group (p<0.001). Preterm birth was significantly more likely in the studied groups as well as perinatal asphyxia and NICU admission (all p<0.001). Adjusting for mode of birth, parity, age and ethnicity did not change the outcomes for the group of women with chronic medical conditions. Perinatal mortality was seen in all groups but in none of the separate groups significantly more than in the reference group. Descriptive statistics, univariate and multivariable logistic regression analyses were applied.

KEY CONCLUSIONS

Women with chronic medical conditions are more likely to experience preterm birth, caesarean births and NICU admission of the new-born.

IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE

Knowledge about perinatal outcomes of women with chronic medical conditions is a first step for obstetrics care providers in order to optimize personalized care.

Disability and in-hospital breastfeeding practices and supports in Ontario, Canada: a population-based study

BACKGROUND

Breastfeeding provides infants with nutrients required for optimal growth and development. We aimed to examine breastfeeding practices and supports that promote exclusive breastfeeding during the birth hospital stay among birthing parents with physical disabilities, sensory disabilities, intellectual or developmental disabilities, and multiple disabilities compared with those without a disability.

METHODS

This population-based cohort study was done in Ontario, Canada. We accessed and analysed health administrative data from ICES and the Better Outcomes Registry & Network. We included all birthing parents aged 15-49 years who had a singleton livebirth between April 1, 2012, and March 31, 2018. The study outcomes were breastfeeding practices and supports that promoted exclusive breastfeeding during the birth hospital stay, conceptualised based on WHO-UNICEF Baby Friendly Hospital Initiative guidelines. Individuals with a physical disability, sensory disability, intellectual or developmental disability, or two or more (multiple) disabilities, identified using diagnostic algorithms, were compared with individuals without disabilities on the opportunity to initiate breastfeeding, in-hospital breastfeeding, exclusive breastfeeding at hospital discharge, skin-to-skin contact, and provision of breastfeeding assistance. Relative risks (RRs) were estimated using modified Poisson regression.

FINDINGS

Our cohort included 634 111 birthing parents, of whom 54 476 (8·6%) had a physical disability, 19 227 (3·0%) had a sensory disability, 1048 (0·2%) had an intellectual or developmental disability, 4050 (0·6%) had multiple disabilities, and 555 310 (87·6%) had no disability. Individuals with intellectual or developmental disabilities were less likely than those without a disability to have an opportunity to initiate breastfeeding (adjusted RR 0·82, 95% CI 0·76-0·88), any in-hospital breastfeeding (0·85, 0·81-0·88), exclusive breastfeeding at hospital discharge (0·73, 0·67-0·79), skin-to-skin contact (0·90, 0·87-0·94), and breastfeeding assistance (0·85, 0·79-0·91). Those with multiple disabilities were less likely to have an opportunity to initiate breastfeeding (0·93, 0·91-0·96), any in-hospital breastfeeding (0·93, 0·92-0·95), exclusive breastfeeding at hospital discharge (0·90, 0·87-0·93), skin-to-skin contact (0·93, 0·91-0·95), and breastfeeding assistance (0·95, 0·92-0·98). Differences for individuals with a physical or sensory disability only were mostly non-significant.

INTERPRETATION

Our findings show disparities in breastfeeding outcomes between individuals without a disability and individuals with intellectual or developmental disabilities or multiple disabilities, but not individuals with physical or sensory disabilities. There is a need for further research on the factors that contribute to breastfeeding intentions, practices, and supports in people with intellectual or developmental disabilities and multiple disabilities, especially factors that affect breastfeeding decision making.

FUNDING

National Institutes of Health and the Canada Research Chairs Program.

Perinatal mental illness among women with disabilities: a population-based cohort study

PURPOSE

To examine the risk of perinatal mental illness, including new-onset disorders and recurrent or ongoing use of mental health care, comparing women with physical, sensory, intellectual/developmental, and multiple disabilities to those without a disability.

METHODS

From all women aged 15-49 years with a singleton birth in Ontario, Canada (2003-2018), those with physical (n = 144,972), sensory (n = 45,249), intellectual/developmental (n = 2,227), and ≥ 2 of these disabilities ("multiple disabilities"; n = 8,883), were compared to 1,601,363 without a disability on risk of healthcare system contact for mental illness from conception to 365 days postpartum. The cohort was stratified into: (1) no pre-pregnancy mental illness (to identify new-onset illness), (2) distal mental illness (> 2 years pre-pregnancy, to identify recurrent illness), and (3) recent mental illness (0-2 years pre-pregnancy, to identify ongoing contact). Modified Poisson regression generated relative risks (aRR), adjusted for age, parity, income quintile, and rural residence.

RESULTS

About 14.7, 26.5, and 56.6% of women with no disabilities had new-onset, recurrent, and ongoing contact for mental illness, respectively, perinatally. Risks were elevated across disability groups for new-onset (physical: aRR 1.18, 95% CI 1.16-1.20; sensory: 1.11, 1.08-1.15; intellectual/developmental: 1.38, 1.17-1.62; multiple: 1.24, 1.15-1.33), recurrent (physical: 1.10, 1.08-1.12; sensory 1.06, 1.02-1.09; intellectual/developmental: 1.24, 1.11-1.37; multiple: 1.16, 1.09-1.23), and ongoing contact (physical: 1.09, 1.08-1.10; sensory: 1.08, 1.06-1.10; intellectual/developmental: 1.31, 1.26-1.37; multiple: 1.20, 1.16-1.23).

CONCLUSION

The heightened use of new, recurrent, and ongoing mental health care across disability groups in the perinatal period suggests that adapted screening and intervention approaches are critical to optimize perinatal mental health in this population.

Risk of adverse neonatal outcomes among pregnant women with disabilities

BACKGROUND

To compare risk of neonatal morbidities between women with and without documented disability and to evaluate mediation of these associations by pre-term birth and caesarean delivery.

METHODS

Using data from the Consortium on Safe Labor (2002-2008; n = 223 385), we evaluated risk of 22 neonatal outcomes among singleton deliveries using ICD-9 codes to define physical (n = 1733), sensory (n = 250) and intellectual disability (n = 91). Adjusted relative risk (aRR) was estimated for each outcome among each category of disability, and among women with any disability using Poisson regression models with robust variance. Causal mediation methods evaluated pre-term birth and caesarean delivery as mediators.

RESULTS

Compared with no disability, neonates of women with any disability had higher risk of nearly all neonatal outcomes, including pre-term birth (aRR = 1.77; 95% CI 1.62-1.94), small for gestational age (SGA) (aRR = 1.25; CI 1.11-1.41), neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) admission (aRR = 1.70; CI 1.54-1.87), seizures (aRR = 2.81; CI 1.54-5.14), cardiomyopathy (aRR = 4.92; CI 1.15-20.95), respiratory morbidities (aRR ranged from 1.33-2.08) and death (aRR = 2.31; CI 1.38-3.87). Women with disabilities were more likely to have a maternal indication for pre-term delivery, including pre-pregnancy diabetes (aRR = 3.80; CI 2.84-5.08), chronic hypertension (aRR = 1.46; CI 0.95-2.25) and severe pre-eclampsia/eclampsia (aRR = 1.47; CI 1.19-1.81). Increased risk varied but was generally consistent across all disability categories. Most outcomes were partially mediated by pre-term birth, except SGA, and heightened risk remained for NICU admissions, respiratory distress syndrome, anaemia and a composite of any adverse outcome (aRR = 1.21; CI 1.10-1.32).

CONCLUSION

Neonates of women with disabilities were at higher risk of a broad range of adverse neonatal outcomes, including death. Risks were not fully explained by pre-term birth.

Perinatal Health Risks And Outcomes Among US Women With Self-Reported Disability, 2011-19

Women with disabilities experience elevated risk for adverse pregnancy outcomes. Most studies have inferred disabilities from diagnosis codes, likely undercounting disabilities. We analyzed data, including self-reported disability status, from the National Survey of Family Growth for the period 2011-19. We compared respondents with and without disabilities on these characteristics: smoking during pregnancy, delayed prenatal care, preterm birth, and low birthweight. A total of 19.5 percent of respondents who had given birth reported a disability, which is a much higher prevalence than estimates reported in US studies using diagnosis codes. Respondents with disabilities were twice as likely as those without disabilities to have smoked during pregnancy (19.0 percent versus 8.9 percent). They also had 24 percent and 29 percent higher risk for preterm birth and low birthweight, respectively. Our findings suggest that studies using diagnosis codes may represent only a small proportion of pregnancies among people with disabilities. Measurement and analysis of self-reported disability would facilitate better understanding of the full extent of disability-related disparities, per the Affordable Care Act.

Severe maternal morbidity and other perinatal complications among women with physical, sensory, or intellectual and developmental disabilities

BACKGROUND

Little is known about severe maternal morbidity (SMM) among women with disabilities.

OBJECTIVE

We assessed differences in SMM and other perinatal complications by presence and type of disability. We hypothesised that SMM and other complications would be more common in births to women with disabilities than to women without disabilities.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective cohort study of California births from 2000 to 2012, using birth and death certificate data linked with hospital discharge data. We included singleton deliveries with gestational age of 23-42 weeks. We classified women as having any disability or not and identified disability type (physical, hearing, vision, intellectual/developmental disabilities [IDD]). Our primary outcome was a composite indicator of SMM. Secondary outcomes included additional perinatal complications: gestational hypertension, preeclampsia, gestational diabetes, venous thromboembolism, chorioamnionitis, puerperal endometritis and mental health disorders complicating pregnancy, childbirth or the puerperium. We used modified Poisson regression to obtain covariate-adjusted relative risks (RR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for the association of disability status and type with SMM and secondary outcomes.

RESULTS

Of 5,787,090 deliveries, 33,044 (0.6%) were to women with disabilities. Of these, 311 per 10,000 were complicated by SMM, compared with 84 per 10,000 deliveries to women without disabilities. In multivariable analyses, risk of SMM for births to women with disabilities was nearly three times that for women without disabilities (RR 2.84, 95% CI 2.67, 3.02). Proportion and risk of SMM were greatest for vision disability (793 per 10,000; RR 4.04, 95% CI 3.41, 4.78). Secondary outcomes were also more common among women with disabilities. In particular, more than a third of births to women with IDD (37.4%) were complicated by mental health disorders (versus 2.2% for women without disabilities).

CONCLUSION

As hypothesised, SMM and other perinatal complications were more common among women with disabilities than among women without disabilities.

Neonatal Outcomes of Mothers With a Disability

OBJECTIVES

To assess the risk of neonatal complications among women with a disability.

METHODS

This population-based cohort study comprised all hospital singleton livebirths in Ontario, Canada from 2003 to 2018. Newborns of women with a physical (N = 144 187), sensory (N = 44 988), intellectual or developmental (N = 2207), or ≥2 disabilities (N = 8823) were each compared with 1 593 354 newborns of women without a disability. Outcomes were preterm birth <37 and <34 weeks, small for gestational age birth weight (SGA), large for gestational age birth weight, neonatal morbidity, and mortality, neonatal abstinence syndrome (NAS), and NICU admission. Relative risks were adjusted for social, health, and health care characteristics.

RESULTS

Risks for neonatal complications were elevated among newborns of women with disabilities compared with those without disabilities. Adjusted relative risks were especially high for newborns of women with an intellectual or developmental disability, including preterm birth <37 weeks (1.37, 95% confidence interval 1.19-1.58), SGA (1.37, 1.24-1.59), neonatal morbidity (1.42, 1.27-1.60), NAS (1.53, 1.12-2.08), and NICU admission (1.53, 1.40-1.67). The same was seen for newborns of women with ≥2 disabilities, including preterm birth <37 weeks (1.48, 1.39-1.59), SGA (1.13, 1.07-1.20), neonatal morbidity (1.28, 1.20-1.36), NAS (1.87, 1.57-2.23), and NICU admission (1.35, 1.29-1.42).

CONCLUSIONS

There is a mild to moderate elevated risk for complications among newborns of women with disabilities. These women may need adapted and enhanced preconception and prenatal care, and their newborns may require extra support after birth.

Continuity of primary care and prenatal care adequacy among women with disabilities in Ontario: A population-based cohort study

BACKGROUND

Women with disabilities experience elevated risks for pregnancy complications and report barriers accessing prenatal care. Emerging evidence highlights the significant role primary care providers play in promoting preventive services like prenatal care.

OBJECTIVE

To examine the relationship between continuity of primary care (COC) and prenatal care adequacy among women with disabilities.

METHODS

We conducted a population-based study using health administrative data in Ontario, Canada. The study population included 15- to 49-year-old women with physical (n = 106,555), sensory (n = 32,194), intellectual/developmental (n = 1515), and multiple (n = 6543) disabilities who had a singleton livebirth or stillbirth in 2003-2017 and ≥ 3 primary care visits < 2 years before conception. COC was measured using the Usual Provider of Care Index. Nominal logistic regression was used to compute adjusted odds ratios (aOR) for prenatal care adequacy, measured using the Revised-Graduated Prenatal Care Utilization Index, for women with low versus moderate/high COC, controlling for other social and medical characteristics.

RESULTS

Women with disabilities with low COC, versus those with moderate/high COC, had increased odds of no (aOR 1.42, 95% CI 1.29-1.56), inadequate (aOR 1.19, 95% CI 1.16-1.23), and intensive prenatal care (aOR 1.22, 95% CI 1.19-1.25) versus adequate. In additional analyses, women with low COC and no/inadequate prenatal care were the most socially disadvantaged among the cohort, and those with low COC and intensive prenatal care had the greatest medical need.

CONCLUSION

Improving primary care access for women with disabilities, particularly those experiencing social disadvantage, could lead to better prenatal care access.

Clinician-reported barriers to providing perinatal care to women with intellectual and developmental disabilities

Background

Research suggests that women with intellectual and developmental disabilities are at increased risk for adverse pregnancy outcomes. Further, they report unmet perinatal care needs. This qualitative study examined clinician perspectives on barriers to providing perinatal care to women with intellectual and developmental disabilities.

Method

We conducted semi-structured interviews and one focus group with US obstetric care clinicians (n=17). We used a content analysis approach to code data and analyse them for larger themes and relationships.

Results

The majority of participants were white, non-Hispanic, and female. Participants reported barriers providing care to pregnant women with intellectual and developmental disabilities across individual (e.g., communication challenges), practice (e.g., identification of disability status), and system levels (e.g., lack of clinician training).

Conclusions

Clinician training and evidence-based guidelines for perinatal care of women with intellectual and developmental disabilities as well as services and supports during pregnancy are needed.

Medication use during pregnancy among women with congenital physical disabilities

BACKGROUND

Medication use during pregnancy is common, with up to 90% of pregnant women taking at least one medication. Women with congenital physical disabilities often report co-occurring conditions during pregnancy that may warrant pharmaceutical treatment, however, research is limited. We aim to describe medication use during pregnancy including: pain, psychotropic, and antibacterial medication, among women with and without congenital physical disabilities.

METHODS

We used data from the Slone Birth Defects Study (1976-2015), a case-control study that collected information on pre-pregnancy health conditions and exposures among participating mothers. Women with congenital physical disabilities (n = 132) included women with spina bifida, cerebral palsy, muscular dystrophy, limb deficiencies, and other skeletal/connective tissue conditions and were matched by interview year and study site to women without congenital physical disabilities (n = 528). Proportions and difference in proportions for each medication were compared between groups. Simple proportions were also calculated for duration and multiple medication use variables.

RESULTS

Women with congenital physical disabilities more frequently reported use of pain (acetaminophen and opioids), psychotropic (antidepressants), and antibacterial medications during pregnancy. Women with congenital physical disabilities used pain and psychotropic medications for longer, frequent durations, and more frequently reported haven taken multiple medications during pregnancy.

CONCLUSION

Women with congenital physical disabilities report higher medication use during pregnancy compared to women without physical disabilities. Patterns may be attributable to co-occurring conditions or increased risk of pregnancy complications in this population. Further research is needed to describe the patterns of medication use for clinical decisions regarding treatment of pregnant women with disabilities.

Experiences of Women of Short Stature During the Perinatal Period

OBJECTIVE

To explore the experiences of women of short stature, including women with dwarfism and osteogenesis imperfecta (OI), during the perinatal period.

DESIGN

Qualitative descriptive.

SETTING

Telephone interviews with women of short stature from across the United States.

PARTICIPANTS

Nine women of short stature, including five with dwarfism and four with osteogenesis imperfecta, between the ages of 18 and 55 years who gave birth within the last 10 years.

METHODS

We used reflexive thematic analysis to analyze interview data.

RESULTS

Four themes represented the participants' experiences during maternity care: Clinicians' Lack of Knowledge, Sources of Information and EmotionalSupport, Clinical Considerations: Effects of Pregnancy and Disability, and Accessibility Barriers and Adaptations. Participants experienced respiratory difficulties and preterm birth. They expressed concerns regarding the lack of clinician knowledge and experience in administering epidural anesthesia to women of short stature and highlighted the important role of disability organizations in disseminating information about childbirth for women with disabilities.

CONCLUSION

Childbearing women of short stature require disability-specific maternity care. Our findings highlight the need for disability education programs for nurse-midwives, nurses, physicians, and other clinicians who provide maternity care to women of short stature.

A population-based analysis of postpartum acute care use among women with disabilities

BACKGROUND

Disability is common in reproductive-aged women, and as many as 1 in 8 pregnancies occur in women with a disability. Women with disabilities experience significant social and health disparities, and are at greater risk than their nondisabled counterparts for perinatal complications. Yet, few studies have examined their postpartum acute care use.

OBJECTIVE

To examine risks of postpartum emergency department visits and hospital admissions among women with and without physical, sensory, and intellectual/developmental disabilities.

STUDY DESIGN

In this population-based study in Ontario, Canada, women with a singleton obstetrical delivery from 2003 to 2019 were classified into those with physical (n=155,500), sensory (n=49,338), intellectual/developmental (n=2650), and multiple disabilities (≥2 disabilities; n=9904), and women without disabilities (n=1,701,574). Primary outcomes were emergency department visits and hospital admissions 0 to 365 days after index delivery hospital discharge. Secondary outcomes were emergency department visits and hospital admissions by primary diagnosis (medical, psychiatric) and by timing (0-7, 8-42, 43-365 days postpartum). Adjusted relative risks comparing each disability group to those without disabilities were adjusted for age; parity; income quintile; rurality; immigrant/refugee status; prepregnancy chronic medical conditions, mental illness, and substance use disorders; and prenatal care provider type.

RESULTS

Any postpartum emergency department visit occurred in 23.5% of women without a disability, with risks elevated in women with physical (32.9%; adjusted relative risk, 1.27; 95% confidence interval, 1.26-1.28), sensory (30.0%; adjusted relative risk, 1.16; 95% confidence interval, 1.15-1.18), intellectual/developmental (48.8%; adjusted relative risk, 1.38; 95% confidence interval, 1.33-1.44), and multiple disabilities (42.0%; adjusted relative risk, 1.44; 95% confidence interval, 1.41-1.48) compared with women without disabilities. Similarly, any postpartum hospital admission occurred in 3.0% of women without a disability, with elevated risks in women with physical (4.8%; adjusted relative risk, 1.37; 95% confidence interval, 1.34-1.40), sensory (4.0%; adjusted relative risk, 1.19; 95% confidence interval, 1.14-1.24), intellectual/developmental (9.6%; adjusted relative risk, 1.96; 95% confidence interval, 1.73-2.21), and multiple disabilities (7.3%; adjusted relative risk, 1.77; 95% confidence interval, 1.64-1.90). Results were consistent by primary diagnosis and timing in the postpartum period.

CONCLUSION

Women with disabilities have elevated risk of emergency department visits and hospital admissions in the postpartum period, indicating greater postpartum morbidity, which requires attention through enhanced and extended follow-up across the postpartum period.

Qualitative Descriptive Study of Childbirth Educators' Perspectives on Prenatal Education for Women With Physical Disability

OBJECTIVE

To explore the knowledge, experiences, and perceptions of childbirth educators about providing childbirth education to women with physical disability.

DESIGN

Qualitative descriptive design.

SETTING

Telephone interviews.

PARTICIPANTS

Seventeen childbirth educators.

METHODS

We used a semistructured interview guide to explore participants' knowledge, experiences, and perceptions of providing childbirth education to women with physical disability. We audio recorded, transcribed, and analyzed the interviews using content analysis.

RESULTS

We identified four themes: Importance of Childbirth Education for All Women, Inadequate Knowledge About Physical Disability, Willingness to Learn About Physical Disability, and Misconceptions and Assumptions About Women With Physical Disability.

CONCLUSION

Participants reported little knowledge about the needs of pregnant women with physical disability and limited experience with them in childbirth education classes. They reported eagerness to learn about disability and its effect on pregnancy to help provide meaningful education to women with physical disability. Childbirth educators need to develop and implement innovative approaches to reach women with physical disability, provide information relevant to their needs, and address the misconceptions and assumptions they may have about women with physical disability and pregnancy.