1
|
Krans EE, Chen BA, Rothenberger SD, Bogen DL, Jones K, Turocy MJ, Klocke LC, Schwarz EB. Increasing access to immediate postpartum contraceptive implants: a prospective clinical trial among patients with opioid use disorder. EUR J CONTRACEP REPR 2022; 27:478-485. [PMID: 36062524 PMCID: PMC9795857 DOI: 10.1080/13625187.2022.2114791] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/23/2022] [Revised: 06/30/2022] [Accepted: 08/14/2022] [Indexed: 12/30/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To evaluate the effects of increased access to immediate postpartum contraceptive implants (IPI) on repeat pregnancy and contraceptive use rates among patients with opioid use disorder (OUD). MATERIALS AND METHODS Between 2016 and 2018, 194 postpartum patients with OUD were offered the option of IPI placement at an institution with limited immediate postpartum long-acting reversible contraception availability and followed for one-year postpartum. Differences in pregnancy rates between participants who did and did not choose IPI were examined using logistic regression with inverse probability of treatment weighting from propensity scores accounting for differences between the two groups. RESULTS Among 194 participants, 96 (49.5%) chose an IPI and 98 (50.5%) chose an alternative method or no contraception (non-IPI). Among IPI participants, 76 (80.9%) continued to use their implant at one-year postpartum. Overall, 19 participants had a repeat pregnancy and 11 (57.9%) were unintended. In multivariable analyses, repeat pregnancy was more likely among those who did not choose IPI (OR 9.90; 95% CI 3.58-27.03) than those who did. Participants with OUD and who used alcohol (11.66; 1.38, 98.20) or cocaine (2.72; 1.23, 5.99) during pregnancy were more likely to choose IPI. Participants who were married (0.28; 0.09, 0.89), engaged in OUD treatment prior to pregnancy (0.48; 0.25, 0.93), and happier when they found out about their pregnancy (0.87; 0.77, 0.98) were less likely to choose IPI. CONCLUSION Offering patients with OUD the option of IPI is associated with high utilisation and continuation rates, and low rates of repeat pregnancy within one-year postpartum.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elizabeth E Krans
- Magee-Womens Research Institute, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
- Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
- Center for Perinatal Addiction Research, Education and Evidence-based Solutions, Magee-Womens Research Institute, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Beatrice A Chen
- Magee-Womens Research Institute, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
- Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Scott D Rothenberger
- Center for Research on Health Care Data Center, Division of General Internal Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Debra L Bogen
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Kelley Jones
- Department of Population Health Sciences, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Mary J Turocy
- Department of Family Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Leah C Klocke
- Magee-Womens Research Institute, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Eleanor B Schwarz
- Center for Healthcare Policy and Research, Division of General Internal Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Hopkins K, Remington C, Eilers MA, Rivas SD, Wallace Huff C, Moore LD, Hampton RM, Ogburn T. Obtaining buy-in for immediate postpartum long-acting reversible contraception programs in Texas hospitals: A qualitative study. Contraception 2022; 108:32-36. [PMID: 34748748 PMCID: PMC9098369 DOI: 10.1016/j.contraception.2021.10.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/09/2021] [Revised: 10/08/2021] [Accepted: 10/11/2021] [Indexed: 11/03/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To understand the specific ways in which champions lead efforts to obtain and sustain buy-in for immediate postpartum long-acting reversible contraception (LARC) programs. METHODS We conducted a qualitative study with 60 semistructured interviews at 3 teaching hospitals in Texas with physicians, nurses, administrators and other staff who participated in the implementation of immediate postpartum LARC. Physicians self-identified as champions and identified other champion physicians and administrators. Two researchers analyzed and coded interview transcripts for content and themes. RESULTS We found that champions draw on institutional knowledge and relationships to build awareness and support for immediate postpartum LARC implementation. To obtain buy-in, champions needed to demonstrate financial sustainability, engage key stakeholders from multiple departments, and obtain nurse buy-in. Champions also created buy-in by communicating goals for the service that focused on expanding reproductive autonomy, improving maternal health, and improving access to postpartum contraception. Some staff, especially nurses, identified reasons for the program that run counter to reproductive justice principles: reducing birth rates, poverty, and/or unplanned pregnancy among young women and high-parity women. Respondents at 2 hospitals noted that not all women had equitable access to immediate postpartum LARC. CONCLUSION Physician and non-physician champions must secure long-term support across multiple hospital departments to successfully implement an immediate postpartum LARC program. For programs to equitably serve all women in need of postpartum contraceptive care, champions and other program leaders need to implement strategies to address access issues. They should also explicitly focus on reproductive justice principles during program introduction and training. IMPLICATIONS Successfully implementing immediate postpartum long-acting reversible contraception programs requires champions with institutional networking connections, administrative and nursing support, and clearly communicated goals. Champions need to address access issues and focus on reproductive justice principles during program introduction and training to equitably serve all women in need of postpartum contraceptive care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kristine Hopkins
- Texas Policy Evaluation Project, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, United States; Population Research Center, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, United States.
| | - Courtney Remington
- Dell Seton Medical Center, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, United States
| | - Michelle A Eilers
- Texas Policy Evaluation Project, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, United States; Population Research Center, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, United States
| | - Saul D Rivas
- School of Medicine, University of Texas Rio Grande Valley, Edinburg, TX, United States
| | - Cristina Wallace Huff
- The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, San Antonio, TX, United States
| | - Lee David Moore
- HSC School of Medicine at the Permian Basin, Texas Tech University, Odessa, TX, United States
| | - Raymond Moss Hampton
- HSC School of Medicine at the Permian Basin, Texas Tech University, Odessa, TX, United States
| | - Tony Ogburn
- School of Medicine, University of Texas Rio Grande Valley, Edinburg, TX, United States
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Boydell N, Cooper M, Cameron ST, Glasier A, Coutts S, McGuire F, Harden J. Perspectives of obstetricians and midwives on the provision of immediate postpartum intrauterine devices: a qualitative service evaluation. BMJ SEXUAL & REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH 2022; 48:85-92. [PMID: 34187901 DOI: 10.1136/bmjsrh-2021-201170] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/16/2021] [Accepted: 06/12/2021] [Indexed: 06/13/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Immediate postpartum intrauterine device (PPIUD) insertion is safe and effective but largely unavailable in Europe. Data on maternity staff views on the provision and implementation of PPIUD services are limited. The objective of this qualitative evaluation was to explore the views and experiences of obstetricians and midwives providing PPIUD within a UK maternity setting, in order to identify areas for improvement and inform service provision in other areas. METHODS Qualitative health services research within two public maternity hospitals in Lothian (Edinburgh and surrounding region), UK. Interviews with 30 maternity staff (obstetricians n=8; midwives n=22) involved in PPIUD provision. Data were analysed thematically. RESULTS Maternity staff were positive about the benefits of PPIUD for women. Midwives reported initial concerns about PPIUD safety, and the impact on workload; these views shifted following training, and as PPIUD was embedded into practice. Having a large pool of PPIUD-trained staff was identified as an important factor in successful service implementation. Having PPIUD 'champions' was important to address staff concerns, encourage training uptake, and advocate for the service to ensure continued resourcing. CONCLUSIONS PPIUD in maternity services can help address unmet need for effective contraception in the immediate postpartum period. We emphasise the importance of widespread engagement around PPIUD among all healthcare professionals involved in the care of women, to ensure staff are informed and supported. Clinical champions and leaders play a key role in amplifying the benefits of PPIUD, and advancing organisational learning.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicola Boydell
- Usher Institute, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | | | - Sharon T Cameron
- Chalmers Centre, NHS Lothian, Edinburgh, UK
- MRC Centre for Reproductive Health, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Anna Glasier
- MRC Centre for Reproductive Health, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Shiona Coutts
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, NHS Lothian, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Frances McGuire
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, NHS Lothian, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Jeni Harden
- Usher Institute, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Feasibility and acceptability of a toolkit-based process to implement patient-centered, immediate postpartum long-acting reversible contraception services. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2022; 226:394.e1-394.e16. [PMID: 34655551 PMCID: PMC8917096 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2021.10.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/16/2021] [Revised: 10/04/2021] [Accepted: 10/08/2021] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND National guidelines recommend that maternity systems provide patient-centered access to immediate postpartum long-acting reversible contraception (ie, insertion of an intrauterine device or implant during the delivery hospitalization). Hospitals face significant barriers to offering these services, and efforts to improve peripartum contraception care quality have met with mixed success. Implementation toolkits-packages of resources and strategies to facilitate the implementation of new services-are a promising approach for guiding clinical practice change. OBJECTIVE This study aimed to develop a theory-informed toolkit, evaluate the feasibility of toolkit-based implementation of immediate postpartum long-acting reversible contraception care in a single site, and refine the toolkit and implementation process for future effectiveness testing. STUDY DESIGN We conducted a single-site feasibility study of the toolkit-based implementation of immediate postpartum contraception services at a large academic medical center in 2017 to 2020. Based on previous qualitative work, we developed a theory-informed implementation toolkit. A stakeholder panel selected toolkit resources to use in a multicomponent implementation intervention at the study site. These resources included tools and strategies designed to optimize implementation conditions (ie, implementation leadership, planning, and evaluation; the financial environment; engagement of key stakeholders; patient needs; compatibility with workflow; and clinician and staff knowledge, skills, and attitudes). The implementation intervention was executed from January 2018 to April 2019. Study outcomes included implementation outcomes (ie, provider perceptions of the implementation process and implementation tools [assessed via online provider survey]) and healthcare quality outcomes (ie, trends in prenatal contraceptive counseling, trends in immediate postpartum long-acting reversible contraceptive utilization [both ascertained by institutional administrative data], and the patient experience of contraceptive care [assessed via serial, cross-sectional, online patient survey items adapted from the National Quality Forum-endorsed, validated Person-Centered Contraceptive Counseling measure]). RESULTS In the implementation process, among 172 of 401 eligible clinicians (43%) participating in surveys, 70% were "extremely" or "somewhat" satisfied with the implementation process overall. In the prenatal contraceptive counseling, among 4960 individuals undergoing childbirth at the study site in 2019, 1789 (36.1%) had documented prenatal counseling about postpartum contraception. Documented counseling rates increased overall throughout 2019 (Q1, 12.5%; Q4, 51.0%) but varied significantly by clinic site (Q4, range 30%-79%). Immediate postpartum long-acting reversible contraception utilization increased throughout the study period (before implementation, 5.46% of deliveries; during implementation, 8.95%; after implementation, 8.58%). In the patient experience of contraceptive care, patient survey respondents (response rate, 15%-29%) were largely White (344/425 [81%]) and highly educated (309/425 [73%] with at least a 4-year college degree), reflecting the study site population. Scores were poor across settings, with modest improvements in the hospital setting from 2018 to 2020 (prenatal visits, 67%-63%; hospitalization, 45%-58%; outpatient after delivery, 69%-65%). Based on these findings, toolkit refinements included additional resources designed to routinize prenatal contraceptive counseling and support a more patient-centered experience of contraceptive care. CONCLUSION A toolkit-based process to implement immediate postpartum long-acting reversible contraceptive services at a single academic center was associated with high acceptability but mixed healthcare quality outcomes. Toolkit resources were added to optimize counseling rates and the patient experience of contraceptive care. Future research should formally test the effectiveness of the refined toolkit in a multisite, prospective trial.
Collapse
|
5
|
Mi Familia Entera: Contraceptive Use Among Spanish-Speaking Mothers of Young Children. Matern Child Health J 2021; 26:139-148. [PMID: 34845572 DOI: 10.1007/s10995-021-03300-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 11/21/2021] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To characterize contraceptive method use and satisfaction among Spanish-speaking Latina immigrants who attend their child's well care visit. METHODS Spanish-speaking women whose youngest child was ≤ 4 years old completed an orally-administered Spanish-language survey in a pediatric clinic (N = 194). Survey items were based on previously published contraceptive use assessments among diverse populations. We used chi-square and Fisher exact test to describe maternal characteristics by contraceptive method effectiveness categories: Tier 1, most effective methods (hormonal implant, intrauterine device, tubal ligation, and vasectomy); Tier 2, very effective methods (hormonal injection, oral contraceptive pill, hormonal patch, and hormonal ring); Tier 3, effective methods (condoms), and no method. RESULTS 34% of women were using a Tier 1 method, 40% were using a Tier 2 method, and 17% had unmet contraceptive need (no pregnancy intention, no birth control); 84% were satisfied with their current method and 82% of women were uninsured. Tier 2 method or no method users were more likely than women using a Tier 1 method to have children < 9 months old (X2 (6, N = 190) = 20.4, p = .002). CONCLUSIONS Latina immigrants with young children who attend their child's pediatric visit are mostly using effective contraceptives and are satisfied with their method. A culturally supportive medical home and access to no-cost long-acting reversible contraceptives through a temporary private grant likely contributed to high contraceptive use and satisfaction in our study. Describing maternal contraceptive use among Latina immigrant mothers can inform future equitable, culturally tailored, approaches to pediatric maternal contraceptive need screening.
Collapse
|
6
|
Salma I, Waelli M. A framework for the implementation of certification procedures in nurse level: a mixed approach study. BMC Health Serv Res 2021; 21:932. [PMID: 34493270 PMCID: PMC8425162 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-021-06940-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/17/2020] [Accepted: 08/18/2021] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Background The implementation of certification procedures across healthcare systems is an essential component of the management process. Several promising approaches were developed toward a successful implementation of such policies; however, a precise adaptation and implementation to each local context was essential. Local activities must be considered in order to generate more pragmatic recommendations for managers. In this study, we built a framework for the implementation of certification procedures at nurse activity level. This was developed using two objectives: the identification of key implementation process components, and the integration of these components into a framework which considered the local socio-material context of nurses’ work. Methods We used a two-step mixed approach. The first was inductive and consisted of a qualitative case study conducted between April and December 2019. Here, we analyzed the implementation of certification procedures in a French teaching hospital. Data were collected using semi-structured interviews and observations. In the second approach, emerging data were deductively analyzed using the Quality Implementation Tool (QIT) and Translational Mobilization Theory (TMT). Analyses were combined to construct an implementation framework. Results Sixteen interviews were conducted with participants from different organizational levels, managers, mid-managers, and nurses. Additionally, 83 observational hours were carried out in two different wards. Our results showed that, (1) All retrieved elements during the process were successfully captured by the QIT components, only one component was not applicable. (2) We identified elements related to the local activity context, with the different interrelationships between actors, actions, and contexts using the TMT. (3) Our analyses were integrated and translated into a framework that presents the implementation of certification procedures in healthcare facilities, with a specific interest to the nurse/mid-manager level. By initially using QIT, the framework components took on a transversal aspect which were then adapted by TMT to the local work context. Conclusions We successfully generated a framework that supports the implementation of certification procedures at the activity level. Our approach identified a broader vision of the interactions between proximity managers, teams, and contexts during change mobilization, which were not encompassed by transversal framework only, such as QIT. In the future, more empirical studies are needed to test this framework. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12913-021-06940-0.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Israa Salma
- École des Hautes Etudes en Santé Publique, 7348 MOS, Rennes, EA, France.
| | - Mathias Waelli
- École des Hautes Etudes en Santé Publique, 7348 MOS, Paris, EA, France.,Global Health Institute, Geneva University, Geneva, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Hamm RF, Iriye BK, Srinivas SK. Implementation Science is Imperative to the Optimization of Obstetric Care. Am J Perinatol 2021; 38:643-648. [PMID: 33321535 PMCID: PMC9268067 DOI: 10.1055/s-0040-1721728] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/22/2022]
Abstract
In an effort aimed at improving outcomes, obstetric teams have enacted comprehensive care bundles and other clinical tools. Yet, these practices have had limited degrees of success on a national scale. Implementation science aims to bridge the divide between the development of evidence-based interventions and their real-world utilization. This emerging field takes into account key stakeholders at the clinician, institution, and health policy levels. Implementation science evaluates how well an intervention is or can be delivered, to whom, in which context, and how it may be up-scaled and sustained. Other medical disciplines have embraced these concepts with success. The frameworks and theories of implementation science can and should be incorporated into both obstetric research and practice. By doing so, we can increase widespread and timely adoption of evidence and further our common goal of decreasing maternal morbidity and mortality. KEY POINTS: · Evidence-based practices have been implemented in obstetrics with variable success.. · Implementation science aims to bridge the divide between the development of evidence-based interventions and their real-world utilization.. · The methodologies of implementation science may be helpful to obstetric research and practice..
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rebecca F. Hamm
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Maternal and Child Health Research Center, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | | | - Sindhu K. Srinivas
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Maternal and Child Health Research Center, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Implementing immediate postpartum contraception: a comparative case study at 11 hospitals. Implement Sci Commun 2021; 2:42. [PMID: 33845922 PMCID: PMC8042857 DOI: 10.1186/s43058-021-00136-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/05/2021] [Accepted: 03/19/2021] [Indexed: 12/27/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Immediate postpartum long-acting reversible contraception (LARC) is an evidence-based practice, but hospitals face significant barriers to its adoption. Our objective was to examine how organizational context (e.g., size, employee attitudes toward the clinical practice) and implementation strategies (i.e., the actions taken to routinize a clinical practice) drive successful implementation of immediate postpartum LARC services, with a goal of informing the design of future implementation interventions. Methods We conducted a comparative case study of the implementation of inpatient postpartum contraceptive care at 11 US maternity hospitals. In 2017–2018, we conducted site visits that included semi-structured key informant interviews informed by the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research. Qualitative measures of implementation success included stakeholder satisfaction, routinization, and sustainability of immediate postpartum LARC services. Qualitative content analysis and cross-case synthesis explored relationships among organizational context, implementation strategies, and implementation success. Results We completed semi-structured interviews with 78 clinicians, nurses, residents, pharmacy and revenue cycle staff, and hospital administrators. Successful implementation required three essential conditions: effective implementation champions, an enabling financial environment, and hospital administrator engagement. Six other contextual conditions were influential: trust and effective communication, alignment with stakeholders’ professional values, perception of meeting patients’ needs, robust learning climate, compatibility with workflow, and positive attitudes and adequate knowledge about the clinical practice. On average, sites used 18 (range 11-22) strategies. Strategies to optimize the financial environment and train clinicians and staff were commonly used. Strategies to plan and evaluate implementation and to engage patients emerged as promising to address barriers to practice change, yet were often underused. Conclusions Implementation efforts in maternity settings may be more successful if they select strategies to optimize local conditions for success. Our findings elucidate key contextual conditions to target and provide a menu of promising implementation strategies for incorporating recommended contraceptive services into routine maternity practice. Additional prospective research should evaluate whether these strategies effectively optimize local conditions for successful implementation in a variety of settings. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s43058-021-00136-7.
Collapse
|
9
|
Curtis KM, Zapata LB, Pagano HP, Nguyen A, Reeves J, Whiteman MK. Removing Unnecessary Medical Barriers to Contraception: Celebrating a Decade of the U.S. Medical Eligibility Criteria for Contraceptive Use. J Womens Health (Larchmt) 2021; 30:293-300. [PMID: 33370207 PMCID: PMC11283819 DOI: 10.1089/jwh.2020.8910] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
In 2010, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) released the U.S. Medical Eligibility Criteria for Contraceptive Use, providing recommendations for health care providers on safe use of contraception for people with certain characteristics or medical conditions. Adapted from World Health Organization guidance, the goal of the recommendations is to remove unnecessary medical barriers to contraception. Over the past decade, CDC has updated recommendations based on new evidence, collaborated with national partners to disseminate and implement the guidelines, and conducted provider surveys to assess changes in attitudes and practices around contraception safety and provision. CDC remains committed to supporting evidence-based guidelines for safe use of contraception, as the basis for improving access to contraception and high-quality family planning services, reducing unintended pregnancy, and improving reproductive health in the United States.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kathryn M Curtis
- Division of Reproductive Health, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Lauren B Zapata
- Division of Reproductive Health, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - H Pamela Pagano
- Division of Reproductive Health, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Antoinette Nguyen
- Division of Reproductive Health, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Jennifer Reeves
- Division of Reproductive Health, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Maura K Whiteman
- Division of Reproductive Health, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Brian JD, Grzanka PR, Mann ES. The age of LARC: making sexual citizens on the frontiers of technoscientific healthism. HEALTH SOCIOLOGY REVIEW : THE JOURNAL OF THE HEALTH SECTION OF THE AUSTRALIAN SOCIOLOGICAL ASSOCIATION 2020; 29:312-328. [PMID: 33411601 DOI: 10.1080/14461242.2020.1784018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/29/2020] [Accepted: 06/12/2020] [Indexed: 06/12/2023]
Abstract
Routinely positioned as the 'first-line option' for contraceptive choice-making, long-acting reversible contraception (LARC) promotion efforts have come under critical scrutiny by reproductive justice advocates for the extent to which public health actors' preference for LARC devices may override potential users' ability to freely (not) choose to use contraception among an array of options. We identify LARC promotion discourse as constituting 'The Age of LARC': multifarious strategies for producing responsible sexual citizens whose health behaviours are empowered via a LARC-only approach to contraceptive use. We suggest that immediate postpartum LARC insertion policies, which have proliferated in the U.S. since 2012, exemplify the new era of LARC hegemony, in which urgency, efficiency, cost-effectiveness, and outcomes dominate both health policy and clinical practice around these contraceptive technologies. By following these efforts to facilitate access to and use of immediate postpartum LARC, we find a discourse on sexual citizenship that paradoxically constructs sexual health freedom through the use of a single class of contraceptive technologies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jenny Dyck Brian
- Barrett, The Honors College, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, USA
| | - Patrick R Grzanka
- Department of Psychology, The University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN, USA
| | - Emily S Mann
- Department of Health Promotion, Education, and Behavior and Women's and Gender Studies Program, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC, USA
| |
Collapse
|