1
|
Sweeney LC, Reddy UM, Campbell K, Xu X. Postpartum readmission risk: a comparison between stillbirths and live births. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2024:S0002-9378(24)00089-9. [PMID: 38367754 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2024.02.017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/31/2023] [Revised: 01/29/2024] [Accepted: 02/09/2024] [Indexed: 02/19/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Stillbirth occurs more commonly among pregnant people with comorbid conditions and obstetrical complications. Stillbirth also independently increases maternal morbidity and imparts a psychosocial hazard when compared with live birth. These distinct needs and burden may increase the risk for postpartum readmission after stillbirth. OBJECTIVE This study aimed to examine the risk for maternal postpartum readmission after stillbirth in comparison with live birth and to identify indications for readmission and the associated risk factors. STUDY DESIGN This was a retrospective cohort of patients with singleton stillbirths or live births, delivered at ≥20 weeks' gestation, who were identified from the 2019 Nationwide Readmissions Database. The primary outcome was all-cause readmission within 6 weeks of discharge from the childbirth hospitalization. The association between stillbirth (vs live birth) and risk for readmission was assessed using multivariable regression models with adjustment for maternal age, sociodemographic characteristics, maternal and obstetrical conditions, and delivery characteristics. Within the stillbirth group, risk factors for readmission were further examined using multivariable regression. The secondary outcomes included principal indication for readmission (categorized based on principal diagnosis code of the readmission hospitalization) and timing of readmission (number of weeks after childbirth hospitalization). Differences in these secondary outcomes were compared between the stillbirth and live birth groups using chi-square tests. All analyses accounted for the complex sample design to generate nationally representative estimates. RESULTS Postpartum readmission occurred in 2.7% of 16,636 patients with stillbirths, whereas it occurred in 1.6% of 2,870,677 patients with live births (unadjusted risk ratio, 1.65; 95% confidence interval, 1.47-1.86). The higher risk for readmission after stillbirth (vs live birth) persisted after adjusting for maternal, obstetrical, and delivery characteristics (adjusted risk ratio, 1.27; 95% confidence interval, 1.11-1.46). The distribution of principal indication for readmission differed after stillbirth and after live birth and included hypertension (30.2% vs 39.5%; unadjusted risk ratio, 0.76; 95% confidence interval, 0.63-0.93), mental health or substance use disorders (6.8% vs 3.6%; unadjusted risk ratio, 1.90; 95% confidence interval, 1.15-3.16), and venous thromboembolism (5.8% vs 2.0%; unadjusted risk ratio, 2.87; 95% confidence interval, 1.60-5.17). Among patients with stillbirths, 56.0% of readmissions occurred within 1 week, 71.8% within 2 weeks, and 88.1% within 4 weeks; the timing of readmission did not differ significantly between the stillbirth and live birth cohorts. Pregestational diabetes (adjusted risk ratio, 1.87; 95% confidence interval, 1.20-2.93), gestational diabetes (adjusted risk ratio, 1.67; 95% confidence interval, 1.03-2.71), hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (adjusted risk ratio, 1.80; 95% confidence interval, 1.31-2.47), obesity (adjusted risk ratio, 1.46; 95% confidence interval, 1.01-2.12), and primary cesarean delivery (adjusted risk ratio, 1.74; 95% confidence interval, 1.17-2.58) were associated with a higher risk for readmission after stillbirth, whereas higher household income was associated with a lower risk for readmission (eg, adjusted risk ratio for income ≥$82,000 vs $1-$47,999, 0.48; 95% confidence interval, 0.30-0.77). CONCLUSION When compared with live births, the risk for postpartum readmission was higher after stillbirths, even after adjustment for differences in the patient demographic and clinical characteristics. Readmission for mental health or substance use disorders and venous thromboembolism is more common after stillbirths than after live births.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lena C Sweeney
- Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT.
| | - Uma M Reddy
- Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Columbia University Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, NY
| | - Katherine Campbell
- Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT
| | - Xiao Xu
- Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Columbia University Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, NY
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Frankeberger J, Jarlenski M, Krans EE, Coulter RWS, Mair C. Opioid Use Disorder and Overdose in the First Year Postpartum: A Rapid Scoping Review and Implications for Future Research. Matern Child Health J 2023; 27:1140-1155. [PMID: 36840785 PMCID: PMC10365595 DOI: 10.1007/s10995-023-03614-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 02/04/2023] [Indexed: 02/26/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Opioid overdose is a leading cause of maternal mortality, yet limited attention has been given to the consequences of opioid use disorder (OUD) in the year following delivery when most drug-related deaths occur. This article provides an overview of the literature on OUD and overdose in the first year postpartum and provides recommendations to advance maternal opioid research. APPROACH A rapid scoping review of peer-reviewed research (2010-2021) on OUD and overdose in the year following delivery was conducted in PubMed, PsycINFO, and Web of Science databases. This article discusses existing research, remaining knowledge gaps, and methodological considerations needed. RESULTS Seven studies were included. Medication for OUD (MOUD) was the only identified factor associated with a reduction in overdose rates. Key literature gaps include the role of mental health disorders and co-occurring substance use, as well as interpersonal, social, and environmental contexts that may contribute to postpartum opioid problems and overdose. CONCLUSION There remains a limited understanding of why women in the first year postpartum are particularly vulnerable to opioid overdose. Recommendations include: (1) identifying subgroups of women with OUD at highest risk for postpartum overdose, (2) assessing opioid use, overdose, and risks throughout the first year postpartum, (3) evaluating the effect of co-occurring physical and mental health conditions and substance use disorders, (4) investigating the social and contextual determinants of opioid use and overdose after delivery, (5) increasing MOUD retention and treatment engagement postpartum, and (6) utilizing rigorous and multidisciplinary research methods to understand and prevent postpartum overdose.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jessica Frankeberger
- Department of Behavioral and Community Health Sciences, University of Pittsburgh School of Public Health, 130 De Soto St, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
- Center for Social Dynamics and Community Health, University of Pittsburgh School of Public Health, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
| | - Marian Jarlenski
- Department of Health Policy and Management, University of Pittsburgh School of Public Health, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Elizabeth E Krans
- Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
- Center for Perinatal Addiction Research, Education and Evidence-based Solutions (Magee CARES), Magee-Womens Research Institute, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Robert W S Coulter
- Department of Behavioral and Community Health Sciences, University of Pittsburgh School of Public Health, 130 De Soto St, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
- Center for Social Dynamics and Community Health, University of Pittsburgh School of Public Health, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Christina Mair
- Department of Behavioral and Community Health Sciences, University of Pittsburgh School of Public Health, 130 De Soto St, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
- Center for Social Dynamics and Community Health, University of Pittsburgh School of Public Health, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Siegel MR, Cohen SJ, Koenigs K, Woods GT, Schwartz LN, Sarathy L, Chou JH, Terplan M, Wilens T, Ecker JL, Bernstein SN, Schiff DM. Assessing the clinical utility of toxicology testing in the peripartum period. Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM 2023; 5:100963. [PMID: 37030508 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajogmf.2023.100963] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/23/2023] [Revised: 03/30/2023] [Accepted: 03/31/2023] [Indexed: 04/10/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Toxicology testing is frequently used as a means of gathering objective data about substance use in pregnancy, but little is known about the clinical utility of testing in the peripartum setting. OBJECTIVE This study aimed to characterize the utility of obtaining maternal-neonatal dyad toxicology testing at the time of delivery. STUDY DESIGN We performed a retrospective chart review of all deliveries in a single healthcare system in Massachusetts between 2016 and 2020, and identified deliveries with either maternal or neonatal toxicology testing at delivery. An unexpected result was defined as a positive test for a nonprescribed substance that was not known on the basis of clinical history, self-report, or previous toxicology testing within a week of delivery, excluding results for cannabis. We evaluated the characteristics of maternal-infant dyads with unexpected positive results, unexpected positive results by rationale for testing, changes in clinical management after an unexpected positive test, and maternal outcomes in the year after delivery using descriptive statistics. RESULTS Of the 2036 maternal-infant dyads with toxicology tests performed during the study period, there were 80 (3.9%) with an unexpected positive result. Diagnosis of substance use disorder with active use in the last 2 years was the clinical rationale for testing that yielded the greatest number of unexpected positive results (10.7% of total tests ordered for this rationale). Inadequate prenatal care (5.8%), maternal use of medication for opioid use disorder (3.8%), maternal medical indications such as hypertension or placental abruption (2.3%), history of substance use disorder in remission (1.7%), or maternal cannabis use (1.6%) yielded lower rates of unexpected results compared with a recent substance use disorder (within the last 2 years). Solely on the basis of findings from unexpected test results, 42% of dyads were referred to child protective services, 30% of dyads had no documentation of maternal counseling during delivery hospitalization, and 31% did not receive breastfeeding counseling after an unexpected test; 22.8% had monitoring for neonatal opioid withdrawal syndrome. Postpartum, 26 (32.5%) were referred to substance use disorder treatment, 31 (38.8%) attended a postpartum mental health visit, and only 26 (32.5%) attended a postpartum visit. Fifteen individuals (18.8%) were readmitted in the year after delivery, all for substance-related medical complications. CONCLUSION Unexpected positive toxicology results at delivery were uncommon, particularly when tests were sent for frequently used clinical rationales for testing, suggesting a need to revisit guidelines surrounding appropriateness of indications for toxicology testing. The poor maternal outcomes in this cohort highlight a missed opportunity for maternal connection to counseling and treatment in the peripartum period.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Molly R Siegel
- Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Biology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA (Dr Siegel, Dr Koenigs, Dr Woods, Dr Ecker, and Dr Bernstein).
| | - Samuel J Cohen
- Department of Pediatrics, Boston Medical Center, Boston, MA (Dr Cohen)
| | - Kathleen Koenigs
- Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Biology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA (Dr Siegel, Dr Koenigs, Dr Woods, Dr Ecker, and Dr Bernstein)
| | - Gregory T Woods
- Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Biology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA (Dr Siegel, Dr Koenigs, Dr Woods, Dr Ecker, and Dr Bernstein)
| | | | - Leela Sarathy
- Division of Newborn Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital for Children, Boston, MA (Dr Sarathy and Dr Chou)
| | - Joseph H Chou
- Division of Newborn Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital for Children, Boston, MA (Dr Sarathy and Dr Chou)
| | | | - Timothy Wilens
- Division of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA (Dr Wilens)
| | - Jeffrey L Ecker
- Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Biology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA (Dr Siegel, Dr Koenigs, Dr Woods, Dr Ecker, and Dr Bernstein)
| | - Sarah N Bernstein
- Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Biology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA (Dr Siegel, Dr Koenigs, Dr Woods, Dr Ecker, and Dr Bernstein)
| | - Davida M Schiff
- Division of General Academic Pediatrics, Massachusetts General Hospital for Children, Boston, MA (Dr Schiff)
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Ouyang L, Cox S, Xu L, Robbins CL, Ko JY. Mental health and substance use disorders at delivery hospitalization and readmissions after delivery discharge. Drug Alcohol Depend 2023; 247:109864. [PMID: 37062248 PMCID: PMC10352865 DOI: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2023.109864] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/19/2022] [Revised: 03/20/2023] [Accepted: 04/01/2023] [Indexed: 04/18/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The objective was to assess mental health and substance use disorders (MSUD) at delivery hospitalization and readmissions after delivery discharge. METHODS This is a population-based retrospective cohort study of persons who had a delivery hospitalization during January to September in the 2019 Nationwide Readmissions Database. We calculated 90-day readmission rates for MSUD and non-MSUD, overall and stratified by MSUD status at delivery. We used multivariable logistic regressions to assess the associations of MSUD type, patient, clinical, and hospital factors at delivery with 90-day MSUD readmissions. RESULTS An estimated 11.8% of the 2,697,605 weighted delivery hospitalizations recorded MSUD diagnoses. The 90-day MSUD and non-MSUD readmission rates were 0.41% and 2.9% among delivery discharges with MSUD diagnoses, compared to 0.047% and 1.9% among delivery discharges without MSUD diagnoses. In multivariable analysis, schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, stimulant-related disorders, depressive disorders, trauma- and stressor-related disorders, alcohol-related disorders, miscellaneous mental and behavioral disorders, and other specified substance-related disorders were significantly associated with increased odds of MSUD readmissions. Three or more co-occurring MSUDs (vs one MSUD), Medicare or Medicaid (vs private) as the primary expected payer, lowest (vs highest) quartile of median household income at residence zip code level, decreasing age, and longer length of stay at delivery were significantly associated with increased odds of MSUD readmissions. CONCLUSION Compared to persons without MSUD at delivery, those with MSUD had higher MSUD and non-MSUD 90-day readmission rates. Strategies to address MSUD readmissions can include improved postpartum MSUD follow-up management, expanded Medicaid postpartum coverage, and addressing social determinants of health.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lijing Ouyang
- Division of Reproductive Health, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA.
| | - Shanna Cox
- Division of Reproductive Health, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Likang Xu
- National Center for Injury Prevention and Control, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Cheryl L Robbins
- Division of Reproductive Health, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Jean Y Ko
- National Center for Injury Prevention and Control, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Elmore AL, Patrick SW, McNeer E, Fryer K, Reid CN, Sappenfield WM, Mehra S, Salemi JL, Marshall J. Treatment access for opioid use disorder among women with medicaid in Florida. Drug Alcohol Depend 2023; 246:109854. [PMID: 37001322 PMCID: PMC10121896 DOI: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2023.109854] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/21/2022] [Revised: 03/15/2023] [Accepted: 03/19/2023] [Indexed: 04/23/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Opioid use disorder (OUD) remains prevalent. Medications for OUD (MOUD) are standard care for pregnant and non-pregnant women. Previous research has identified barriers to MOUD for women with Medicaid but did not account for the type of MOUD (methadone vs. buprenorphine) or pregnancy status. We examined access to MOUD by treatment type for pregnant and non-pregnant women with Medicaid in Florida. METHODS A secondary analysis of Florida "secret-shopper" data was conducted. Calls were made to clinicians from the 2018 Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration provider list by women posing as either a pregnant or non-pregnant woman with OUD and Medicaid. We examined 546 calls to buprenorphine-waivered providers (BWP) and 139 to opioid treatment programs (OTP). Counts and percentages were used to describe caller success by type of treatment and pregnancy status. Chi-square tests were used to identify statistical differences. RESULTS Only 42 % of calls reached a treatment provider in Florida. Pregnant and non-pregnant women were less likely to obtain an appointment with Medicaid coverage by a BWP than an OTP (p < 0.01). Nearly 40 % of OTPs offered appointments to callers with Medicaid compared to only 17 % of BWPs. Both types of providers denied appointments more often for pregnant women. Thirty-eight percent of BWP's and 12 % of OTP's denied appointments to pregnant women using cash or Medicaid payment. CONCLUSIONS Our study demonstrates logistical and financial barriers to treatment for OUD among pregnant and non-pregnant women with Medicaid in Florida and highlights the need for improved systems of care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amanda L Elmore
- College of Public Health, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, United States.
| | - Stephen W Patrick
- Vanderbilt Center for Child Health Policy & Departments of Pediatrics and Health Policy, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, United States
| | - Elizabeth McNeer
- Department of Biostatistics, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, United States
| | - Kimberly Fryer
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, United States
| | - Chinyere N Reid
- College of Public Health, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, United States
| | | | - Saloni Mehra
- College of Public Health, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, United States
| | - Jason L Salemi
- College of Public Health, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, United States
| | - Jennifer Marshall
- College of Public Health, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, United States
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Association between pharmacologic treatment and hospital utilization at birth among neonatal opioid withdrawal syndrome mother-infant dyads. J Perinatol 2023; 43:283-292. [PMID: 36717607 DOI: 10.1038/s41372-023-01623-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/30/2022] [Revised: 01/19/2023] [Accepted: 01/23/2023] [Indexed: 01/31/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE We linked mother-baby dyads to explore associations between maternal medication-assisted therapy (MAT) and infants' pharmacologic treatment on birth hospital utilization for infants with NOWS. METHODS We extracted singleton infant and maternal delivery discharges from PHIS hospitals with large volumes of deliveries for 2016-2019. We matched newborns with NOWS to maternal delivery discharges by hospital, day of birth, mode of delivery, and ZIP code. We examined the association between maternal MAT, infants' pharmacologic treatment, and hospital utilization at birth. RESULTS We included N = 146 mother-baby dyads from six hospitals (74% match rate). Among matched dyads, 51% received maternal MAT, 60% pharmacotherapy (37% both). Infants treated non-pharmacologically and born to mothers receiving MAT had the shortest stays vs. infants without pharmacotherapy or MAT (RR = 0.29; 95% CI: 0.25-0.35). CONCLUSIONS These findings underscore the importance of adequate perinatal treatment for opioid use disorder to improve outcomes for mothers and infants with opioid exposure.
Collapse
|
7
|
McKee KS, Akobirshoev I, McKee M, Li FS, Mitra M. Postpartum Hospital Readmissions Among Massachusetts Women Who are Deaf or Hard of Hearing. J Womens Health (Larchmt) 2023; 32:109-117. [PMID: 36040351 PMCID: PMC10024058 DOI: 10.1089/jwh.2022.0068] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/13/2023] Open
Abstract
Objectives: Deaf or hard of hearing (DHH) women are at a higher risk of adverse pregnancy and birth outcomes compared with other women. However, little is known about postpartum outcomes among DHH women. The objective was to compare the risk of postpartum hospitalizations for DHH compared with non-DHH women and the leading indications for postpartum admissions. Materials and Methods: We analyzed data from the 1998-2017 Massachusetts Pregnancy to Early Life Longitudinal Data System and identified 3,546 singleton deliveries to DHH women and 1,381,439 singleton deliveries to non-DHH women. We used Cox proportional hazard models to compare the first hospital admission and ≥2 hospital admissions between DHH and non-DHH women within 1-42, 43-90, and 91-365 days after delivery. Results: DHH women had a higher risk for any hospital admissions across all periods (hazard ratios [HR] = 1.84; 95% confidence intervals [CI] 1.46-2.34 within 1-42 days; HR = 2.76; 95%CI 1.99-3.83 within 43-90 days; and HR = 3.10; 95%CI 2.66-3.60 91-365 days) after childbirth compared with non-DHH women. They had an almost seven times higher risk for repeated hospital admissions within 43-90 days (HR = 6.84; 95%CI 1.66-28.21) and nearly four times higher the risk within 91-365 days (HR = 3.63; 95%CI 2.00-6.59) after delivery compared with non-DHH women. The leading indications for readmission among DHH women included: conditions complicating the puerperium/hemorrhage and soft tissues disorders. Conclusion: Compared with other women, DHH women had significantly higher readmissions across all postpartum periods and for repeated admissions >42 days. Leading postpartum indications were distinct from those of non-DHH women.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kimberly S. McKee
- Department of Family Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
| | - Ilhom Akobirshoev
- Lurie Institute for Disability Policy, Heller School, Brandeis University, Waltham, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Michael McKee
- Department of Family Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
| | - Frank S. Li
- Lurie Institute for Disability Policy, Heller School, Brandeis University, Waltham, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Monika Mitra
- Lurie Institute for Disability Policy, Heller School, Brandeis University, Waltham, Massachusetts, USA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Wen T, Baer RJ, Oltman S, Sobhani NC, Venkatesh KK, Friedman AM, Jelliffe-Pawlowski LL. Development of a risk prediction score for acute postpartum care utilization. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2022; 35:10506-10513. [PMID: 36220265 DOI: 10.1080/14767058.2022.2131387] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/20/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Acute postpartum care utilization and readmissions are increasing in the United States and contribute significantly to maternal morbidity, mortality, and healthcare costs. Currently, there are limited data on the prediction of patients who will require acute postpartum care utilization. OBJECTIVE To develop and validate a risk prediction model for acute postpartum care utilization. STUDY DESIGN A retrospective cohort study of delivery hospitalizations with a linked birth certificate and discharge records in California from 2011 to 2015 was divided into a training and testing set for analysis and validation. Predictive models for acute postpartum care utilization using demographic, comorbidity, obstetrical complication, and other factors were developed using a backward stepwise logistic regression on training data. A risk score for acute postpartum care utilization was developed using beta coefficients from the factors remaining in the final multivariable model. Risk scores were validated using the testing dataset. RESULTS The final sample included 2,045,988 delivery hospitalizations with an acute postpartum care utilization rate of 7.6% in both training and testing cohorts. Twenty-two risk factors were identified for the final multivariable model, including several that were associated with two or more increased odds of acute care utilization (public insurance, postpartum hemorrhage, extremes of maternal age). The mean risk score was 2.45, conferring a 15 times higher risk of acute postpartum care utilization compared to those with a risk score <1 (RR 15.4, 95% CI: 11.0, 21.7). Demographics and test performance characteristics were comparably similar in predictive capability in both models (0.67 in both the training and testing cohorts). CONCLUSION Risk factors that are identifiable before discharge can be used to create a cumulative risk score to stratify patients at the lowest and highest risk of acute postpartum care utilization with satisfactory accuracy. External validation and the addition of other granular clinical variables are necessary to validate the feasibility of use.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Timothy Wen
- Division of Maternal Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Rebecca J Baer
- Department of Pediatrics, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA.,UCSF California Preterm Birth Initiative, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Scott Oltman
- UCSF California Preterm Birth Initiative, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Nasim C Sobhani
- Division of Maternal Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Kartik K Venkatesh
- Division of Maternal Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Department of Epidemiology, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Alexander M Friedman
- Division of Maternal Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Laura L Jelliffe-Pawlowski
- UCSF California Preterm Birth Initiative, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.,Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Combs CA, Goffman D, Pettker CM, Pettker C. Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine Special Statement: A critique of postpartum readmission rate as a quality metric. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2022; 226:B2-B9. [PMID: 34838802 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2021.11.1355] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/01/2022]
Abstract
Hospital readmission is considered a core measure of quality in healthcare. Readmission soon after hospital discharge can result from suboptimal care during the index hospitalization or from inadequate systems for postdischarge care. For many conditions, readmission is associated with a high rate of serious morbidity and potentially avoidable costs. In obstetrics, for postpartum care specifically, hospitals and payers can easily track the rate of maternal readmission after childbirth and may seek to incentivize obstetricians, maternal-fetal medicine specialists, or provider groups to reduce the rate of readmission. However, this practice has not been shown to improve outcomes or reduce harm. There are major concerns with incentivizing providers to reduce postpartum readmissions, including the lack of a standardized metric, a baseline rate of 1% to 2% that is too low to accurately discriminate between random variation and controllable factors, the need for risk adjustment that greatly complicates rate calculations, the potential for bias depending on the duration of the follow-up interval, the potential for the "gaming" of the metric, the lack of evidence that obstetrical providers can influence the rate, and the potential for unintended harm in the vulnerable postpartum population. Until these problems are adequately addressed, maternal readmission rate after a childbirth hospitalization currently has limited utility as a metric for quality or performance improvement or as a factor to adjust provider reimbursement.
Collapse
|
10
|
Gabrielson S, Carwile J, O'Connor A, Ahrens K. Maternal opioid use disorder at delivery hospitalization in a rural state: Maine, 2009–2018. Public Health 2020; 181:171-179. [DOI: 10.1016/j.puhe.2019.12.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/27/2019] [Revised: 12/18/2019] [Accepted: 12/20/2019] [Indexed: 12/28/2022]
|