Assessment of changes in quality of life in patients with Dentofacial deformities after orthognathic surgery—A study in Nepalese population

Evaluation of pre- and postoperative nutrition and oral health-related quality of life in orthognathic surgery patients

OBJECTIVE

Orthognathic surgery is a complex orofacial surgery that can significantly impact occlusal function and effect nutritional and quality of life parameters. This study aimed to evaluate alterations in dietary intake, chewing function, physical activity, and oral health-related quality of life of patients undergoing orthognathic surgery.

RESEARCH METHODS AND PROCEDURES

In this prospective longitudinal study, the assessments were conducted at: preoperatively (T0) and postoperative first week (T1), second week (T2), first month (T3), and third month (T4) between May 2021 and March 2023. Sociodemographic questionnaire, 24-h dietary recall record, chewing ability form, International Physical Activity Questionnaire, and Oral Health Impact Profile-14 (OHIP-14) was applied at face-to-face interviews.

RESULTS

Seventy eligible orthognathic surgery patients were evaluated, and 37 patients (52.8%) completed this study. Energy and fat intake significantly decreased from T0 to T1 (P < 0.001) and returned to basis by T4 (P = 0.015). Fiber intake was found to be lowest at T1 and T2 compared with other time points (P < 0.001). Chewing ability showed a deterioration and then improvement; however, patients still had difficulties chewing hard foods at T4. The OHIP-14 increased at T2 and T3 from T0 (P < 0.001 and P = 0.021, respectively) and showed a significant improvement at T4 (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

The findings indicate a temporary decline in nutritional intake and chewing ability with subsequent recovery by the third month postsurgery. These changes, along with the trends in oral health-related quality of life, underscore the need for tailored nutritional and functional rehabilitation programs following orthognathic surgery.

Oral Health-Related Quality of Life Changes in Patients with Dentofacial Deformities Class II and III after Orthognathic Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Our aim was to assess the impact of combined orthodontic-surgical treatment on patients' oral health-related quality of life (OHRQoL) according to type of dentofacial deformities, by synthesizing the available evidence.

METHODS

Search was conducted in the PubMed, Embase/MEDLINE, Scopus, and Cochrane databases. The eligibility criteria were studies that measured OHRQoL before-after orthognathic surgery, with results disaggregated by Class II and III. Two researchers independently performed the selection process, data extraction, and methodological quality assessment. Meta-analysis of the standard mean differences (SMD) was performed using random effect models.

RESULTS

The search identified 1047 references. Thirteen studies met the inclusion criteria, and four were included in the meta-analysis. The SMD of OHRQL global score showed large improvement 4-7 months after surgery in Class II and III patients (2.09, 95% CI 0.68 to 3.49 and 1.96, 95% CI 1.22 to 2.70, respectively). The sensitivity analyses, excluding studies with weak methodological quality, showed that Class III patients' improvement in functional limitation was significantly higher than in Class II patients (SMD 0.57, 95% CI 0.12-1.02).

CONCLUSIONS

There is not enough evidence to support differences between Class II and III patients in the OHRQoL impact after orthognathic surgery, but findings suggest lower improvement of some domains in Class II patients.

Changes in health-related quality of life after orthognathic surgery: a multicenter study

Objective

To evaluate changes in general and oral health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in patients with dentofacial deformity undergoing orthognathic surgery, and whether these changes vary according to type of deformity.

Material and methods

This is a prospective longitudinal multicenter study of patients with dentofacial deformities (n = 90). The Orthognathic Quality of Life Questionnaire (OQLQ), Oral Health Impact Profile (OHIP-14), and Short-Form Health Survey version2 (SF-36v2) were self-completed by patients before surgery, 3 and 6 months after orthognathic surgery. Change was tested using paired t-test, and compared between Class II and Class III of dentofacial deformity by unpaired t-test. The magnitude of change was examined estimating the standardized response mean (SRM).

Results

The OQLQ and OHIP-14 showed statistically significant improvements 6 months after surgery, compared with the pre-surgical evaluation, but the SF-36v2 only in the physical component summary. The SRM was large in OQLQ oral function (-1.11) and dentofacial facial aesthetics (-0.76) dimensions, and moderate in most of OHIP-14 dimensions. Differences in mean change between Class II and III were statistically significant for global scores of OQLQ (-10.08 vs -20.30, p = 0.0271) and OHIP-14 (-3.79 vs -10.56, p = 0.0144).

Conclusions

A significant improvement was observed in oral HRQoL and in the physical component of general health in patients with dentofacial deformities Class II and III after orthognathic surgery. Improvement was greater among Class III than in Class II patients.

Clinical relevance

These results provide patients, oral health care professionals, and planners with valuable information to make evidence-based decisions and facilitate shared clinical decision-making, taking into account the patients’ perspective.

Impact of orthognathic surgery on quality of life of patients with dentofacial deformity: a systematic review and meta-analysis

The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of orthognathic surgery on the quality of life (QoL) of patients with dentofacial deformity. This systematic review was performed through the survey of observational studies that had evaluated the impact of orthognathic surgery on the QoL of patients with dentofacial deformity. The article databases included PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, LILACS, BBO, Cochrane Library, and grey literature. The risk of bias was analysed according to the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale for quality assessment. The meta-analysis was performed considering the exposure before and after orthognathic surgery using the Oral Health Impact Profile (OHIP-14) versus the Orthognathic Quality of Life Questionnaire (OQLQ). A total of 2,263 articles were identified. Twelve studies remained in the qualitative synthesis and seven studies were included in the meta-analysis. The impact of QoL both preoperatively and postoperatively with the OHIP-14 questionnaire was 7.63 (95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.62 to 13.65; p = 0.01) and the OQLQ questionnaire was 20.53 (95% CI = 14.27 to 26.79; p < 0.0001). Overall impact of QoL was 16.01 (95% CI = 10.50 to 21.52; p < 0.0001), which showed that orthognathic surgery has an influence on the QoL. Orthognathic surgery generates positive impact on the QoL of patients with dentofacial deformity.

Impact of orthodontic-surgical treatment on quality of life: a meta-analysis

Background

Orthognathic surgery involves a change in the patient’s functional and aesthetic aspects.

Objective

The objective was to answer the following focused question: what is the impact on quality of life (QoL; aesthetic, function, social, and psychological aspects) in patients undergoing orthodontic-surgical treatment?

Search methods

Appropriate word combinations and truncations were selected and tailored specifically for each electronic database: PubMed/Medline, Scopus, Web of Science, PsycInfo, and Latin American and Caribbean Health Sciences Literature and gray literature.

Selection criteria

Studies that met the following criteria was included: patients with dentofacial deformity (P); surgical correction through orthodontic-surgical treatment (E/I); before orthodontic-surgical treatment or patients with no dentofacial deformity (C); QoL (O); cross-sectional, cohort, case-control and randomized or non-randomized clinical trial (S).

Data collection and analysis

In phase 1, two reviewers independently reviewed the titles and abstracts of all references. All articles that did not meet the inclusion criteria were excluded. In phase 2, the same reviewers completely read the selected articles independently.

Results

A total of 2879 articles were retrieved during the final database search. Fifty-two articles were selected for full reading, of which 16 were excluded, resulting in 36 included articles. The meta-analysis was performed using 13 of the selected studies. When comparing the period before any treatment with the post-operative period of 4–8 weeks, there was an association only for facial aesthetics (mean difference = 3.00; 95 per cent confidence interval = 1.10–4.89; inconsistency index = 63 per cent). The comparison between the period before any treatment with the 6 month post-operative period showed an improved QoL in all of the domains evaluated and, when comparing data after the orthodontic-surgical preparation (before surgery) and after 5–12 months of surgery, there was also statistical significance with an increased QoL for all of the domains evaluated.

Conclusions

In conclusion, based on the results of this systematic review and meta-analysis, the evidence suggests an improvement in the QoL of patients undergoing orthodontic-surgical treatment regarding aesthetic, functional, social, and psychological aspects.

Registration

CRD42017069495