Prescription practices and attitude of psychiatrists towards clozapine: A survey of psychiatrists from India

Psychiatrists' views on clozapine prescribing in Ireland

INTRODUCTION

Despite proven effectiveness in refractory schizophrenia, clozapine remains underutilised, and it is important to understand potential reasons for this. This study's aim was to examine in a National sample of Consultant Psychiatrists their knowledge of, attitudes and perceived barriers to clozapine use.

METHODS

A novel questionnaire was designed and distributed by email to 275 Consultant Psychiatrists in Republic of Ireland.

RESULTS

Twenty-eight percent (n = 77) completed the survey, with 55% of respondents practicing for 15 or more years. Clinicians expressed confidence in managing clozapine treatment and side effects and were well aware of clozapine's clinical effectiveness and guideline-based use. A majority indicated insufficient experience managing rechallenge and half expressed insufficient experience managing adverse events. Perceived patient factors were highlighted as barriers with 69% of respondents reporting patients' concern about effectiveness and 50% regarding tolerability. Sixty-four percent (n = 40) indicated that a specialised/tertiary clozapine service would facilitate initiation, with 57% (n = 36) reporting less frequent blood monitoring would aid clozapine prescribing. A majority identified that access to dedicated staff (81%, n = 51) and dedicated day hospital services (84%, n = 53) would facilitate community initiation.

CONCLUSION

Consultants are familiar with clozapine use and related guidelines. Dedicated staff and facilities for clozapine use is one identified structural change to enhance clozapine prescribing in Ireland. Tertiary service or clinical advice service would assist in clozapine rechallenge cases or in managing significant adverse events. More structured patient education regarding clozapine effectiveness and professional development programmes focused on managing side effects and rechallenge may promote clozapine use.

An experience of using Clozapine in elderly patients with mental disorders

BACKGROUND

There is little information on using clozapine in elderly patients with mental disorders from India.

AIM

To evaluate the sociodemographic and clinical profile of elderly (age ≥ 60 years) patients started on clozapine.

METHODOLOGY

The clozapine registry in the department was screened to identify elderly patients who were started on clozapine. Treatment records of these patients were reviewed to extract sociodemographic and clinical details.

RESULTS

Out of the available information of 1058 patients in the registry, 42 (3.96 %) were elderly (≥ 60 years) patients. About two-thirds of the patients had treatment resistance, i.e., their psychotic illness had not responded to two adequate trials of antipsychotics, and the second most common indication for starting clozapine was tardive dystonia or tardive dyskinesia (23.8 %). The mean dose of clozapine was 135.89 (SD: 109.6; Range: 37.5-500; median: 87.5) mg/day. The mean duration of clozapine use at the time of data extraction for the study sample was 3.55 (SD: 2.15; Range 0.3-9; median: 3) years. At the last follow-up, about three-fourths of patients were experiencing at least one side effect, with constipation being the most common side effect, followed by sedation, weight gain, and hypersalivation. In only four patients, clozapine was stopped during the follow-up. In terms of effectiveness, majority of the patients were rated as much improved or very much improved on Clinical Global Impression-Improvement subscale.

CONCLUSION

Clozapine can be safely used in elderly patients with mental disorders. Hence, clozapine should not be withheld in elderly patients with mental disorders whenever indicated.

Use of Clozapine in persons with a history of seizures: A retrospective study

BACKGROUND

Seizures are considered to be one of the dreaded side effects of clozapine, and due to this, the use of clozapine is avoided in patients with treatment-resistant schizophrenia. Resultantly, there is little information about the use of clozapine among patients with seizure disorder.

AIM

To assess the safety of clozapine in patients with history of seizures in their lifetime before starting clozapine and receiving clozapine for the management of psychotic disorders.

RESULTS

Out of the 958 patients, 35 (3.65 %) had a history of at least one seizure episode before starting clozapine, with a mean of 5.06 (SD: 7.23; Median: 3.00) seizures before starting clozapine. The mean duration between the last seizure and the starting of clozapine was 123.75 (SD: 124.99; Median: 84) months, with nine patients having an episode of seizure in the previous 12 months and 15 patients being seizure-free for more than ten years. About one-fourth (25.7 %; nine out of 35) of the patients had recurrence of seizure while receiving clozapine for a mean duration of about five years. When the recurrence of seizure after starting clozapine was evaluated in patients receiving antiepileptics along with clozapine, the incidence of at least one seizure was 26.67 % (4 out of 15), and among those not receiving antiepileptics, the incidence of at least one seizure was 25 % (5 out of 20). The dose of clozapine at which seizure was noted ranged from 12.5 mg to 600 mg/day with a mean of 236.25 (SD: 169.04; Median: 162.5) mg/day. In none of the patients, clozapine had to be stopped due to the continuation of seizures.

CONCLUSION

About one-fourth of the patients with history of an episode of seizure have recurrence of seizure while receiving clozapine. The demographic and clinical variables do not differ between those who develop and who do not develop seizures after starting clozapine, including concomitant use of antiepileptics.

Advocating for the inclusion of therapeutic drug monitoring in the national essential diagnostic list: Perspectives from psychiatrists

India published its first edition of the National Essential Diagnostics List in 2019. The list depicts the list of diagnostic tests that can ensure affordable and quality healthcare delivery by removing barriers toward accessibility and reducing out-of-pocket expenditure. In 2024, the Indian Council of Medical Research has invited suggestions for revision of the list. Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) has been a promising modality and has been useful for a range of indications like monitoring medication adherence, diagnosing suboptimal treatment, detecting drug interactions, and guiding initiation or withdrawal of therapy. In this article, the authors make a case for inclusion of TDM for certain psychotropic drugs like lithium, sodium valproate, carbamazepine, and clozapine at the district hospital level. The authors have tried to justify the inclusion backed by recent evolving evidence.

Experience with and attitude toward clozapine use among patients receiving clozapine on long term and their caregivers

Background

Despite clozapine being the gold standard for treating patients suffering from treatment-resistant schizophrenia, the experience and attitude of patients receiving clozapine for a long duration and their caregivers have not been evaluated, especially in India and other low-middle-income countries. Also, no standardized scale has been validated for such assessment.

Objective

This study aimed to evaluate the perception regarding clozapine among patients and their caregivers. We also attempted to evaluate the factor structure of the scale for such assessment.

Methods

A total of 172 consenting patients who have been receiving clozapine for ≥1 year and their caregivers were evaluated on self-designed questionnaires (patient and caregiver versions containing 44 and 47 items, respectively) to assess various aspects of their experiences about clozapine use.

Results

A majority (70-80%) of patients and caregivers reported improvement in psychotic symptoms, mood symptoms, and overall functioning with starting of clozapine. However, about 40% of the patients reported cognitive side effects, and 20-25% reported disabling side effects like lethargy, forgetfulness and decreased attention, and distress related to blood testing after starting of clozapine. Factor analysis of the questionnaires yielded five- and seven-factor models for the experience and attitude of the patients and the caregivers, respectively. The positive experiences were associated clinical and functional improvement, lower disability, and improvement in functioning as well as the self-reported perceived improvement by the patient and caregiver.

Conclusion

This study suggests that patients tend to have an overall positive experience and attitude about using clozapine. The caregivers also report the beneficial effect on the caregiving. A good level of agreement was seen between the experience of patients, caregivers, and clinician-rated improvement in the psychopathology and functioning.

De Novo Seizures, Obsessive Compulsive Symptoms and Neutropenias in Patients on Clozapine: A Retrospective Cohort Study

BACKGROUND

Clozapine has well-documented inter-ethnic variations in pharmacokinetics. There is a paucity of data about clozapine use and associated adverse events such as seizures, obsessive compulsive symptoms, neutropenia, and agranulocytosis, from India.

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study followed up 228 patients initiated on clozapine in a tertiary care referral center in India for an average of 10 years. We calculated incidence rates of new-onset seizures, new-onset obsessive compulsive symptoms, agranulocytosis, and neutropenia. We collected data on doses of clozapine used and serum assays and calculated concentration-to-dose (C/D) ratios. We also collected relevant clinical details about clozapine-induced seizures.

RESULTS

In the sample, 16.8% had new-onset seizures, 12.3% had new-onset OC symptoms, 2.7% had neutropenia, and 0.9% had agranulocytosis. The mean C/D ratio was 2.09 (SD = 1.8). Almost half (46.3%) of available serum assays were in the supra-therapeutic range. Seizures were associated with a higher clozapine dose at one year (OR = 1.003; 95%CI = 1.000-1.006; P value = 0.045) and the presence of positive psychotic symptoms at one year (OR = 4.214; 95%CI = 1.894-9.373; P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Compared to existing literature, Indians have a higher rate of clozapine- related seizures and need lower doses to reach therapeutic serum levels.

Indian Psychiatric Society multicentre study: Diagnostic patterns, comorbidity and prescription practices for patients with Dementia

BACKGROUND

There are more than 5 million people with dementia in India. Multicentre studies looking at details of treatment for people with dementia In India are lacking. Clinical audit is a quality improvement process which aims to systematically assess, evaluate, and improve patient care. Evaluating current practice is the key to a clinical audit cycle.

AIM

This study aimed to assess the diagnostic patterns and prescribing practices of psychiatrists for patients with dementia in India.

METHOD

A retrospective case file study was conducted across several centers in India.

RESULTS

Information from the case records of 586 patients with dementia was obtained. Mean age of the patients was 71.14 years (standard deviation = 9.42). Three hundred twenty one (54.8%) were men. Alzheimer's disease (349; 59.6%) was the most frequent diagnosis followed by vascular dementia (117; 20%). Three hundred fifty five (60.6%) patients had medical disorders and 47.4% patients were taking medications for their medical conditions. Eighty one (69.2%) patients with vascular dementia had cardiovascular problems. Majority of the patients (524; 89.4%) were on medications for dementia. Most frequently prescribed treatment was Donepezil (230; 39.2%) followed by Donepezil-Memantine combination (225; 38.4%). Overall, 380 (64.8%) patients were on antipsychotics. Quetiapine (213, 36.3%) was the most frequently used antipsychotic. Overall, 113 (19.3%) patients were on antidepressants, 80 (13.7%) patients were on sedatives/hypnotics, and 16 (2.7%) patients were on mood stabilizers. Three hundred nineteen (55.4%) patients and caregivers of 374 (65%) patients were receiving psychosocial interventions.

CONCLUSIONS

Diagnostic and prescription patterns in dementia which emerged from this study are comparable to other studies both nationally and internationally. Comparing current practices at individual and national levels against accepted guidelines, obtaining feedback, identifying gaps and instituting remedial measures help to improve the standard of care provided.

Clozapine research from India: A systematic review

BACKGROUND

Although clozapine is much researched in western literature, a review on Indian research on clozapine published in 2010 reported limited data and need for further research in this area.

AIM

We aimed to conduct a systematic review of research on clozapine from India from 2010 to mid-2022 and also compare the same with research output before 2010.

METHODOLOGY

A systematic various search engines, i.e., PUBMED, Medknow, Hinari and Google Scholar was done using the key words clozapine and India. Published articles with clozapine in the title and having an author from India, published during 2010 to July 2022 were included.

RESULTS

Initial Internet and hand searches yielded 280 articles, out of which 126 articles were excluded due to various reasons and 154 articles, were included for the review. This included 84 case reports, 49 original articles, 11 review articles and 10 letters to the editor as comments. We found an increase in the number of publications during the period of 2010-2022 compared to 1997-2009 in all types of publications. Over the years a significant proportion of the articles focused on various side effects of clozapine, factors associated with response and non-response to clozapine and evaluation of outcomes other than efficacy/effectiveness. However, all the studies were limited to a single centre with no multicentric studies on clozapine.

CONCLUSION

Over the last 12 years or so, there is increase in the number of publications on clozapine. However, there is lack of multicentric studies.

Iranian psychiatrists' attitude towards clozapine use for patients with treatment-resistant schizophrenia: a nationwide survey

BACKGROUND

Clozapine has the greatest efficacy for treatment-resistant schizophrenia (TRS), even though its underutilization is not uncommon across different countries. This study aimed to investigate the knowledge and attitude of Iranian psychiatrists toward clozapine use.

METHOD

In this cross-sectional study, a questionnaire was distributed among psychiatrists registered with the Iranian Psychiatrists Association (including its provincial branches) to assess their knowledge and attitude towards clozapine use. A total of 282 psychiatrists completed the questionnaire. Descriptive analysis was used to describe demographic information, and Chi-square tests were conducted to determine if there is an association between academic position and work experience. All statistical analyses were performed using SPSS® version 25.0 for Windows, and a significance level of 0.05 was used.

RESULTS

Most respondents (93%) acknowledged that they prescribed clozapine for their patients, and 74% believed that clozapine was more effective than other antipsychotic drugs. However, 43.3% of the respondents said they did not believe in the safety of clozapine. Difficulty initiating and having no firsthand experience in the superiority of clozapine were reported by 81.2 and 80% of the respondents, respectively. Our results also showed an association between having an academic position and access to appropriate facilities for the control and management of patients treated with clozapine and believing in the safety of clozapine (p < 0.05). Longer work experience (more than 15 years) was associated with a higher prescription of clozapine, belief in greater effectiveness of clozapine, and its safety (p < 0.0001).

CONCLUSION

Iranian psychiatrists had a good self-perception of knowledge about the efficacy of clozapine for patients with TRS, but concerns about serious side effects are common. Psychiatrists with longer work experience and academic positions were more optimistic towards clozapine use than the younger ones with no academic position. Considering the results in planning the strategies to decrease concerns about clozapine use is recommended.

Association between previous and future antipsychotic adherence in patients initiating clozapine: real-world observational study

BACKGROUND

Although recognised as the most effective antipsychotic for treatment-resistant schizophrenia, clozapine remains underused. One reason is the widespread concern about non-adherence to clozapine because of poor adherence before initiating clozapine.

AIMS

To determine if prior poor out-patient adherence to treatmentbefore initiating clozapine predisposes to poor out-patient adherence to clozapine or to any antipsychotics (including clozapine) after its initiation.

METHOD

This cohort study included 3228 patients with schizophrenia living in Quebec (Canada) initiating (with a 2-year clearance period) oral clozapine (index date) between 2009 and 2016. Using pharmacy data, out-patient adherence to treatment was measured by the medication possession ratio (MPR), over a 1-year period preceding and following the index date. Five groups of patients were formed based on their prior MPR level (independent variable). Two dependent variables were defined after clozapine initiation (good out-patient adherence to any antipsychotics and to clozapine only). Along with multiple logistic regressions, state sequence analysis was used as a visual representation of antipsychotic-use trajectories over time, before and after clozapine initiation.

RESULTS

Although prior poor adherence to antipsychotics was associated with poor adherence after clozapine initiation, the absolute risk of subsequent poor adherence remained low, regardless of previous adherence level. Most patients adhered to their treatment after initiating clozapine (>68% to clozapine and >84% to any antipsychotics).

CONCLUSIONS

Despite the fact that poor adherence prior to initiating clozapine is widely recognised by clinicians as a barrier for the prescription of clozapine, the current study supports the initiation of clozapine in all eligible patients.

Managing treatment resistance in schizophrenia: A joint study in Hong Kong and Singapore

OBJECTIVE

This study surveyed clinicians in psychiatry in Hong Kong and Singapore to understand their familiarity and prescribing practices in treatment-resistant schizophrenia (TRS) and clozapine-resistant schizophrenia (CRS).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

All clinicians in psychiatry in both regions were invited through email to participate in an anonymous online survey. The survey collected information on the participants' characteristics, their familiarity and experience with clozapine use, and their treatment practices in TRS and CRS. Data collection took place between September 2019 and February 2020 in Hong Kong and December 2018 and March 2019 in Singapore.

RESULTS

261 clinicians responded to the survey, with response rates of 19% (105 out of 556 participants) in Hong Kong and 50% (156 out of 309 participants) in Singapore. The majority of respondents (99.0% in Hong Kong; 87.9% in Singapore) were familiar with treatment guidelines for TRS. However, approximately half (54.2% in Hong Kong; 41.7% in Singapore) delayed the prescription of clozapine when indicated. In terms of alternatives to clozapine, approximately half or more of the clinicians in both regions would use high dose antipsychotics, long-acting injectable antipsychotics, antipsychotic polypharmacy, while the adjuvant use of mood stabilizers and electroconvulsive therapy differed between the two regions. In those with CRS, between 10 and 20% of the respondents added adjuvant mood stabilizers or antipsychotics, and 3-10% would use an antidepressant.

CONCLUSION

Clozapine delays occur in spite of clinicians' familiarity with treatment guidelines. More research is needed to guide the use of augmentation strategies and the search for effective treatments beyond clozapine.

Socio demographic, clinical, and side effect profile of patients on clozapine in Kashmir, North India

Background

Clozapine is an atypical second-generation antipsychotic belonging to the family of dibenzodiazepines. There is lack of literature on clozapine from this part of the world. So, our aim was to study the socio demographic, clinical and side effect profile of patients on clozapine in Kashmir.

Results

The mean age of the study group was 32.6 ± 8.9 years with majority being males (78.4%), unmarried (78.4%), unemployed (77.2%), and belonging to nuclear families (77.2%). Almost half of them resided in urban localities (51.1%) and studied upto middle school (55.7%). Around three- fourth (75%) of the patients had diagnosis of treatment-resistant schizophrenia. The mean dose of clozapine was 338.92 ± 158.11 mgs. Sedation (76.1%), hypersalivation (69.5%), constipation (46.6%), and weight gain (34.1%) were most common side effects noted in patients. 4.5% cases developed seizures while on clozapine. 2.3% patients developed agranulocytosis while 4.5% patients developed neutropenia on clozapine. The neutropenia was more pronounced in patients of schizophrenia with suicidal tendencies with doses of more than 400 mg.

Conclusions

We have used clozapine in a wide range of indications. Our patients seem to tolerate and respond to higher doses of clozapine and the prevalence of blood dyscrasias in our study sample was much higher than the rest of India.

Attitude towards and experience with clozapine of patients and their caregivers after three months of starting of clozapine

AIM

To evaluate the patients' perceptions of clozapine and that of their family caregivers about the positive and negative effects of clozapine.

METHODOLOGY

52 patients and their family caregivers were assessed for their perception of the positive and negative effects of clozapine by using a self-designed questionnaire.

RESULTS

About half (53.8%) of the patients were not distressed of frequent blood testing. At least two-thirds of the patients acknowledged a reduction in psychopathology, achieving clinical stability, improvement in the behavior of others towards them, improvement in their behavior towards others, improvement in regularity in medication intake, agreed that their clinical state will worsen if clozapine is stopped, and reported overall satisfaction/happiness with the intake of clozapine. In general, caregivers also reported similar perceptions. In terms of caregiver outcomes, about two-third to three-fourth of the caregivers reported a reduction in caregiving needs, personal caregiver distress and tension, caregiver burden and time spent in caregiving. About half of the caregivers reported a reduction in the cost of treatment, since the starting of clozapine.

CONCLUSIONS

To conclude, the present study suggests that a significant proportion of patients receiving clozapine for three months and their relatives report positive perception and experience with the molecule.

Does the Starting of Clozapine Influence Coprescription of Other Medications?: A Study From India

PURPOSE/BACKGROUND

Little is understood about the prescription load before and after the starting of clozapine. Accordingly, this study aimed to evaluate the medication load of patients receiving clozapine, just before starting clozapine and after being on clozapine for at least 1 year. Additionally, the impact of clozapine on severity of illness was evaluated.

METHODS/PROCEDURES

Two hundred seventy-seven outpatients receiving clozapine were prospectively evaluated for their prescription after at least 1 year of starting clozapine. Additionally, these patients were assessed on the Clinical Global Impression-Improvement scale to evaluate the overall clinical benefit with clozapine.

FINDINGS/RESULTS

They had been receiving clozapine for 6.55 (SD, 4.8; range, 1-24; median, 5) years at the time of assessment. At the start of clozapine, more than one third of the patients were receiving 2 antipsychotics. A small proportion was receiving other psychotropics, such as antidepressants, mood stabilizers, and benzodiazepines. After being on clozapine for 1 year, there was a significant reduction in the number of patients receiving two antipsychotic medications (P < 0.001), number of patients receiving antidepressants (if amitriptyline was left out), benzodiazepine (P < 0.001), and anticholinergic medications (P < 0.001). Further, there was a reduction in the mean chlorpromazine equivalent of antipsychotics (P < 0.001) and the total number of medications received by the patients (P < 0.001). However, there was an increase in the prescription rates of antihypertensive drugs (P = 0.03), anti-diabetic medications (P < 0.01), and anti-dyslipidemic medications. At follow-up, there was a significant improvement in symptoms as assessed by Clinical Global Impression-Improvement scale.

IMPLICATIONS/CONCLUSIONS

This study suggests that long-term use of clozapine is associated with substantial improvement in symptoms with a reduction in the medication load.

Prescription attitudes and practices regarding clozapine among Serbian psychiatrists: results of a nationwide survey

OBJECTIVE

Despite clozapine being the most effective treatment for treatment-resistant schizophrenia (TRS), a clear explanation as to why it is underutilized and why its initiation is delayed remains unclear. The first aim of the study was to conduct a nation-wide assessment of both the psychiatrists' attitudes of the obstacles for prescribing clozapine as well as their prescription practices. The second aim was to make recommendations, based on the results obtained, for improving the Serbian clozapine guidelines.

METHODS

A questionnaire was conducted consisting of two parts. One regarded the clinical characteristics of the psychiatrists, while the second contained questions about indications for clozapine initiation, clozapine prescribing tendencies, and barriers to clozapine use. The questionnaire was sent to 302 Serbian psychiatrists.

RESULTS

With 161 out of the 302 psychiatrists returning the questionnaires, the response rate was 53.3%. Nearly 60% of the psychiatrists treated 10 or more patients with clozapine, with TRS being the most common indication. Only four psychiatrists (2.5%) had no patients currently on clozapine. Psychiatrists indicated that their fear of agranulocytosis (68%) constituted the greatest obstacle for clozapine prescription, followed closely by weight gain (56%), and sedation (39%). Despite their fear of agranulocytosis, only 83.9% of the psychiatrists monitored leukocytes regularly.

CONCLUSION

In general, psychiatrists in Serbia seem to be confident in prescribing clozapine, even in the absence of clear monitoring guidelines and the possibility of therapeutic drug monitoring. In order to reduce obstacles for clozapine prescription, monitoring laxity, and an overreliance on personal experience, we recommend three modifications of the existing clozapine guideline.

Haematological side effects associated with clozapine: A retrospective study from India

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the incidence of clozapine induced haematological side effects among patients receiving clozapine.

METHODS

Data of 333 patients who were on clozapine for a mean duration of 52.96 (45.18) months were reviewed for haematological abnormalities.

RESULTS

Most of the patients (n = 320; 96.1 %) were diagnosed with psychotic disorders, mainly schizophrenia. These patients were receiving clozapine in the dose range of 12.5 mg-600 mg/day, with a mean dose of 212.08 (102.43) mg/day at the time of review of their records. About one-tenth (N = 33; 9.9 %) of patients developed eosinophilia (absolute eosinophil count >600), and 8.2 % (N = 27) experienced thrombocytopenia (platelet count <100,000 cmm³) and 7 patients developed anaemia (haemoglobin level <10 gm%). Only 2 (0.6%) patients developed neutropenia. Mean dose (mg/day) at which haematological side-effects occurred were as follows: 159.85 (87.65) mg/day for eosinophilia; 193.98 (148.93) mg/day for thrombocytopenia; 78.57 (22.49) mg/day for anaemia. In a small proportion of patients, clozapine was discontinued due to the haematological abnormalities and in other patients these abnormalities normalized on its own in subsequent follow-up.

CONCLUSION

Clozapine is associated eosinophilia and thrombocytopenia, which are often benign and in majority of the patients these normalize with time.

Addressing clozapine under-prescribing and barriers to initiation: a psychiatrist, advanced practice provider, and trainee survey

Clozapine use has declined, despite its superior antipsychotic efficacy in treatment-resistant schizophrenia. Implications for clozapine underutilization include suboptimal treatment outcomes and increased hospitalizations. Many barriers preventing the use of clozapine have been described in the literature, including suboptimal knowledge and poor perceptions. The aim of this study was to assess psychiatry prescribers' perception and knowledge of clozapine. A survey was distributed to advanced practice providers, psychiatrists, and trainees (i.e. residents and fellows) at 10 medical centers within the US and Canada. The survey asked respondents about their perception of clozapine use and assessed their pharmacotherapeutic knowledge of clozapine. Two hundred eleven individual submitted completed surveys of a possible 1152; a response rate of 18.3%. There were no statistically significant differences between the advanced practice provider plus psychiatrist groups and the trainee group for most perception (eight of nine) and knowledge (eight of nine) questions. The knowledge questions with the lowest scores pertained to clozapine reinitiation and myocarditis. The majority of all respondents (144, 68.2%) felt that clozapine prescribing was a burden. Findings of this study support the need for continued clozapine education regardless of a prescriber's age/experience. Future studies to assess barriers to clozapine prescribing should extend beyond academic centers.

Prescriber and institutional barriers and facilitators of clozapine use: A systematic review

BACKGROUND

As clozapine is under-prescribed in persons with treatment-resistant schizophrenia (TRS), it is necessary to better identify the determinants of health inequalities in access to clozapine use.

OBJECTIVE

To identify mental health professionals' characteristics or attitudes and institutional characteristics facilitating or limiting clozapine prescribing.

METHOD

We systematically searched multiple electronic databases for articles reporting: (i) mental health professionals' attitudes and characteristics favoring or limiting clozapine prescribing; (ii) institutional characteristics associated with variations in clozapine prescribing; (iii) interventions aimed at enhancing clozapine prescribing. Data were synthesized narratively.

RESULTS

A total of 31 articles reporting findings of 29 studies published from 1993 to 2017 in 11 countries fulfilled our inclusion criteria. The main prescriber-related barriers to clozapine prescribing are lack of personal prescribing experience and concern with pharmacological characteristics of clozapine (blood monitoring and adverse effects). Lack of knowledge about the effectiveness of clozapine does not appear as a major determinant of under-prescription. Institutional-related characteristics favoring clozapine prescribing are prescribers' adherence to evidence-based medicine principles and learning by modelling from experienced clozapine prescribers.

CONCLUSION

Effective strategies to increase access to clozapine in persons with TRS include implementation of integrated clozapine clinics, simplification of blood monitoring, education for prescribers and contact with experienced prescribers. Programs addressing barriers in clozapine prescription need to be disseminated more broadly to ensure persons with TRS have access to evidenced based treatments such as clozapine. Inequality in access to clozapine care should be more systematically handled by mental health facilities and health regulatory agencies.

Safety of antipsychotics for the treatment of schizophrenia: a focus on the adverse effects of clozapine

Clozapine, a dibenzodiazepine developed in 1961, is a multireceptorial atypical antipsychotic approved for the treatment of resistant schizophrenia. Since its introduction, it has remained the drug of choice in treatment-resistant schizophrenia, despite a wide range of adverse effects, as it is a very effective drug in everyday clinical practice. However, clozapine is not considered as a top-of-the-line treatment because it may often be difficult for some patients to tolerate as some adverse effects can be particularly bothersome (i.e. sedation, weight gain, sialorrhea etc.) and it has some other potentially dangerous and life-threatening side effects (i.e. myocarditis, seizures, agranulocytosis or granulocytopenia, gastrointestinal hypomotility etc.). As poor treatment adherence in patients with resistant schizophrenia may increase the risk of a psychotic relapse, which may further lead to impaired social and cognitive functioning, psychiatric hospitalizations and increased treatment costs, clozapine adverse effects are a common reason for discontinuing this medication. Therefore, every effort should be made to monitor and minimize these adverse effects in order to improve their early detection and management. The aim of this paper is to briefly summarize and provide an update on major clozapine adverse effects, especially focusing on those that are severe and potentially life threatening, even if most of the latter are relatively uncommon.

Psychological problems and burnout among medical professionals of a tertiary care hospital of North India: A cross-sectional study

BACKGROUND

There is a growing evidence of increased prevalence of psychological problems (stress, depression, anxiety, and substance abuse) and feelings of burnout among medical professionals all over the world and this has been shown to be associated with lapses in patient care. Data from India in this regard are limited.

AIMS

To assess the various psychological problems (depression, perceived stress, and burnout) among medical professionals working in a government-funded tertiary care institute of India.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

An online e-mail survey was carried out among resident doctors and faculty members (a total of 1721 doctors). A total of 445 doctors (response rate-27.69%) responded to the survey. The survey included Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9), Cohen's Perceived Stress Scale, and Maslach Burnout Inventory.

RESULTS

Of the eligible 1607 participants, 445 responders, 376 (77.75%) were resident doctors and 69 (15.5%) were faculty. As per the PHQ-9, 30.1% of participants were found to have depression and 16.7% of participants reported suicidal ideations. About two-thirds of the sample experienced moderate level of stress (67.2%) and another 13% of participants reported high level of stress. More than 90% of the participants reported some level of burnout. Compared to faculty, higher proportion of the residents reported stress, depression, and burnout. Presence of depression, stress, or burnout was associated with lower indulgence in recreational activities, experiencing verbal or physical abuse in the hand of patients/caregivers, feelings that seniors do not show empathy toward patients, and seniors do not show empathy toward them.

CONCLUSIONS

The present study suggests that a significantly higher proportion of doctors in Indian setting experience stress, depression, and burnout. The presence of stress, depression, and burnout is associated with long working hours and negative patient-related outcomes, adverse doctor-patient interactions, and interpersonal interactions among the colleagues.

Effects of oral versus long-acting antipsychotics on social functioning: A psychiatrists' survey in India

BACKGROUND

Schizophrenia is associated with functional challenges for patients; relapses in schizophrenia may lead to increased treatment costs and poor quality of life.

OBJECTIVE

This SUSTAIN-I study was conducted to establish psychiatrists' perspective on impact of long-acting injectables (LAIs) antipsychotics on the socio-economic and functional burden of schizophrenia.

METHODS

This cross-sectional, survey-based study was conducted in 5 cities in India. Psychiatrists (≥5years of experience) working in clinics, psychiatric, government hospitals and rehabilitation centers were included and administered a specially designed questionnaire to elicit information on their clinical practice and prescription patterns. Perceived treatment costs for LAI versus oral antipsychotic treatments (OATs) and relapse rates were assessed. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize results.

RESULTS

Total 31 physicians completed this survey. In acute phase, OAT prescription was higher whereas chronic patients were treated with either OATs or LAIs. Treatment with LAIs was the preferred treatment in 9% of chronic cases. Reduced relapse rates were observed with LAI treatment: 12% patients on LAIs relapsed as compared with 60% patients on OATs. Monthly medication cost for oral medications was lower ($8-$17) than short-acting injectables ($22-$50). For chronic cases, atypical antipsychotics cost (oral: $11.7-25, LAI: $150-167) was higher than typical antipsychotics (oral: $4-5, LAI: $5-25). Of the total expenses incurred, cost for hospital admissions was the largest component (78%).

CONCLUSION

Despite enhanced treatment adherence and potential to lower risk of rehospitalizations from relapse, LAIs are not the preferred treatment choice for patients with schizophrenia in India, owing to their perceived high costs.

Trends in the prescription of clozapine in a psychiatric hospital: a 5-year observational study

INTRODUCTION

Clozapine is a well-recognized effective treatment for some patients with treatment-resistant schizophrenia (TRS). Although it has potential benefits and approximately 30% of patients have a clinical indication for clozapine use, prescription rates are low.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate clozapine prescription trends over a 5-year period in a tertiary psychiatric hospital.

METHODS

In this observational study, data prospectively collected by the Medical and Statistical File Service (Serviço de Arquivo Médico e Estatístico) and the Pharmacy Division of Instituto de Psiquiatria de Santa Catarina between January 2010 and December 2014 were summarized and analyzed by investigators blinded to data collection. The number of 100 mg clozapine pills dispensed by the Pharmacy Division to the inpatient units was the outcome and considered a proxy measure of clozapine prescriptions. The number of occupied inpatient unit beds and the number of patients admitted with F20-F29 (ICD-10) diagnoses during the study period were considered to be possible confounders.

RESULTS

A multiple linear regression model showed that time in months was independently associated with an increase in the number of clozapine pills dispensed by the Pharmacy Division (β coefficient = 15.82; 95% confidence interval 10.88-20.75).

CONCLUSION

Clozapine prescriptions were found to have increased during the 5-year period studied, a trend that is opposite to reports from several other countries.

International trends in clozapine use: a study in 17 countries

OBJECTIVE

There is some evidence that clozapine is significantly underutilised. Also, clozapine use is thought to vary by country, but so far no international study has assessed trends in clozapine prescribing. Therefore, this study aimed to assess clozapine use trends on an international scale, using standardised criteria for data analysis.

METHOD

A repeated cross-sectional design was applied to data extracts (2005-2014) from 17 countries worldwide.

RESULTS

In 2014, overall clozapine use prevalence was greatest in Finland (189.2/100 000 persons) and in New Zealand (116.3/100 000), and lowest in the Japanese cohort (0.6/100 000), and in the privately insured US cohort (14.0/100 000). From 2005 to 2014, clozapine use increased in almost all studied countries (relative increase: 7.8-197.2%). In most countries, clozapine use was highest in 40-59-year-olds (range: 0.6/100 000 (Japan) to 344.8/100 000 (Finland)). In youths (10-19 years), clozapine use was highest in Finland (24.7/100 000) and in the publicly insured US cohort (15.5/100 000).

CONCLUSION

While clozapine use has increased in most studied countries over recent years, clozapine is still underutilised in many countries, with clozapine utilisation patterns differing significantly between countries. Future research should address the implementation of interventions designed to facilitate increased clozapine utilisation.