Comparisons of the effects of long-acting injectable monotherapy and combination therapy of long-acting injectable treatment with oral antipsychotics on treatment retention in patients with chronic schizophrenia

Is the long-acting gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist long protocol better for patients with endometriosis undergoing IVF?

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the effect of the long-acting gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist (GnRHa) long protocol on in vitro fertilization (IVF) outcomes of patients with endometriosis (EMs).

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study was carried out from July 1, 2016 to June 30, 2021. In all, 798 patients with EMs who underwent first IVF were enrolled. The patients were classified by the ovarian stimulation protocols. The clinical outcomes of IVF were compared in each group.

RESULTS

Those EMs patients who received the long-acting GnRHa long protocol had significantly higher clinical pregnancy rate (72.00%, 60.70% and 50.90%, respectively; P = 0.047 and 0.010) and implantation rate (51.0%, 44.6%, and 38.7%, respectively; P = 0.006 and <0.001) compared with the short-acting GnRHa long protocol and the GnRH antagonist protocol. Live birth rate was also significantly higher than the GnRH antagonist protocol (60.10% vs. 40.0%, P = 0.032), but not statistically different from the short-acting GnRHa (60.10% vs. 53.80%, P = 0.443). In addition, they also had significantly higher duration of stimulation, total dose of gonadotropin, and number of high-quality embryos transferred compared with other groups (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

The long-acting GnRHa long protocol could improve IVF outcomes of patients with EMs compared with the short-acting GnRHa long protocol and the GnRH antagonist protocol.

Comparison of prolactin level, sexual function, body mass index, and liver function tests in patients using depot antipsychotics

Amaç: Bu çalışmada uzun etkili antipsikotik ilaç formları (uzun etkili paliperidon palmitat, risperidon depo ve zuklopentiksol depo) kullanan hastalarda cinsel işlev bozuklukları, vücut kitle indeksi, karaciğer fonksiyon testleri ve prolaktin düzeylerinin karşılaştırılması amaçlanmıştır. Gereç ve Yöntem: Bu çalışmaya şizofreni tanılı ve uzun etkili antipsikotik tedavisi alan hastalar dahil edildi. Tüm katılımcılara demografik veri formu, Pozitif ve Negatif Sendrom Ölçeği (PANSS), Calgary Şizofrenide Depresyon Ölçeği (CŞDÖ) ve Arizona Cinsel Yaşantılar Ölçeği (ACYÖ) uygulandı. Ardından üre, kreatinin, karaciğer fonksiyon testleri, kolesterol ve prolaktin düzeylerini değerlendirmek için venöz kan örnekleri alındı. Bulgular: Çalışmaya 95 hasta dahil edildi. Dahil edilenlerin 79’u erkek (%83.2) ve 16’sı kadındı (%16.8). Tüm hastaların yaş ortalaması 36.77±10.24 yıl idi. Vücut kitle indeksleri ortalaması ise 27.06±4.95 kg/m2 idi. Gruplar arasında ACYÖ ve CŞDÖ skorları açısından farklılık saptanmadı. Prolaktin değeri paliperidon depo kullanan hastalarda zuklopentiksol depo kullanan hastalardan yüksek olarak hesap edilmiştir. Sonuç: Sonuçlarımıza göre cinsel işlevleri etkileyen prolaktin değerleri, hastalar semptom belirtmese de uzun etkili antipsikotik kullanan hastalarda göz önünde bulundurulmalıdır. Uzun etkili antipsikotik kullanımının hem prolaktin değerleri hem de diğer laboratuvar parametrelerine olan etkileri konusunda ileri araştırmalar yapılmalıdır.

Combination Therapy of Long-Acting Injectable Second-Generation Antipsychotics and Oral Antipsychotics: A Retrospective Chart Review and Prescribers' Attitude Survey

BACKGROUND

Although long-acting injectable antipsychotics (LAI-APs) have been considered as a monotherapeutic option in the maintenance treatment of schizophrenia, it has been recently reported that the combination therapy of LAI-APs and oral antipsychotics (OAPs) is common.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective chart review to examine the situation of the combination therapy of LAI second-generation antipsychotics (LAI-SGAs) and OAPs, and a questionnaire survey to investigate prescribers' attitudes toward the combination therapy. We included patients who received any LAI-SGAs for 1 month or longer and classified them into monotherapy and combination therapy groups. We collected information on age, sex, primary psychiatric diagnosis, and concomitant psychotropic medications.

RESULTS

Of the 132 patients, 39 (29.5%) received the combination therapy of LAI-SGAs and OAPs. Long-acting injectable risperidone was significantly associated with receiving the combination therapy compared with LAI aripiprazole. Olanzapine was the most common OAP in combination with LAI-SGAs. Only 8 patients (20.5%) concurrently received the same type of OAPs as LAI-SGAs. More than 60% of the patients received OAP polypharmacy before the initiation of LAI-SGAs. The psychiatrists in charge prescribed LAI-SGAs mainly because of a concern about adherence, and OAPs mainly because of insufficient dose of LAI-SGAs, to patients in the combination therapy group. They estimated that adherence to OAPs in two thirds of the patients in the combination therapy group was 80% or higher.

CONCLUSIONS

The present study showed that the combination therapy of LAI-SGAs and OAPs is often conducted in real-world clinical practice. Considering the reason for the introduction of LAI-APs, clinicians should carefully monitor patients' adherence to OAPs concurrently used with LAI-APs.

Consideration of Long-Acting Injectable Antipsychotics for Polypharmacy Regimen in the Treatment of Schizophrenia: Put It on the Table or Not?

Antipsychotic monotherapy (APM) is considered best-acceptable treatment option regardless of antipsychotic class and formulation types for treating schizophrenia. However, antipsychotic polypharmacy (APP) has been also widely utilized in routine clinical practice. Despite APP has some clinical benefits it has also numerous pitfalls in relation with increased total number and doses of APs leading to adverse events as well as decrease of treatment adherence and persistence resulting in poor clinical outcomes. Recent introduction of long-acting injectable antipsychotics (LAIs) to the market has offered a chance for better medication adherence/persistence and also provided a simplification of treatment regime leading to more stabilized treatment for schizophrenia patients. When we cannot stay away from APP in the treatment of schizophrenia, clinicians need to find more proper APP regimens and thereby utilization of APP in efficient way should be a practical strategy to benefit schizophrenia patient in a real world treatment setting. With this regard, LAIs can be one of available APP regimen for treatment of schizophrenia in routine practice since their clinical utility and pharmacokinetic stability over oral APs have been well-elaborated today. However, when we have to commence LAIs as a part of APP with oral APs or other LAIs, every effort should be made before doing so whether or not validated and available treatment options or other clinical factors were not done or evaluated yet. Any treatment guidelines do not support APP regardless of the formulation of APP regimen or address two or more LAIs for treatment of schizophrenia till today.

Comparison of Efficacy and Safety between Long-Acting Injectable Antipsychotic Monotherapy and Combination of Long-Acting Injectable and Oral Antipsychotics in Patients with Schizophrenia

BACKGROUND

Long-acting injectable (LAI) antipsychotics are used as a monotherapy in patients with schizophrenia. However, the combination of LAI and oral antipsychotics is commonly used in clinical practice, despite there being very limited studies investigating the efficacy and safety of this combination compared with LAI antipsychotic monotherapy.

OBJECTIVE

To study the efficacy and safety of LAI antipsychotic monotherapy compared with the combination of LAI and oral antipsychotics in patients with schizophrenia.

METHODS

This study was a retrospective cohort study, which classified eligible patients into two groups: the LAI antipsychotic monotherapy group and the combination of LAI and oral antipsychotic group. The primary outcome was hospitalization between groups. The duration of the study was 2 years.

RESULTS

In total, 86 patients completed the study and were analysed (LAI antipsychotic monotherapy group: n = 25; combination of LAI and oral antipsychotic group: n = 61). There was no significant difference in hospitalization between the two groups (P = 1.000). For other outcomes, there were also no significant differences in both all-cause discontinuation (P = 0.667) and adverse drug reactions (P = 0.732) between the two groups.

CONCLUSION

The efficacy and safety of LAI antipsychotic monotherapy appeared similar to the combination of LAI and oral antipsychotics in patients with schizophrenia. Therefore, the combination of LAI and oral antipsychotics, which is commonly used in clinical practice, may not be necessary.

Schizophrenia; A Review on Promising Drug Delivery Systems

Background:

Schizophrenia belongs to mental illnesses affecting 1% of the worldwide population. Its therapy is still unmet; thus, researchers aimed to develop new pharmacological molecules which can improve its management.

Methods:

Moreover, the current typical and atypical antipsychotics should be formulated in more efficacious systems that can deliver the drug in the brain with as few side effects as possible. Further, the development of long-acting efficient drug delivery systems could be significant in minimizing frequent dosing which is nonpreferred to schizophrenics.

Results:

Herein, authors focused on current developments of antipsychotic medications used in schizophrenia management. Various studies, which include the use of first and second-generation antipsychotics, were analyzed according to their efficacy. In fact, in this review, oral, injectable, transdermal and intranasal formulations entrapped antipsychotics are presented to be valuable guidance for scientists to formulate more effective drug delivery systems for schizophrenic patients.

Conclusions:

This review aimed to assist researchers working on schizophrenia management by summarizing current medications and newly synthesized drug delivery systems recently found in the literature.

Real-world effectiveness of antipsychotic monotherapy and polytherapy in 1543 patients with acute-phase schizophrenia

PURPOSE

The effectiveness of antipsychotic treatments in the acute phase of schizophrenia in actual clinical practice remains somewhat unclear. Therefore, the purpose of the present naturalistic, multi-center study conducted from 1 year starting in September 2017 was to examine the response rate to an initial or second antipsychotic in newly admitted patients with acute-phase schizophrenia, as well as the response rate and quality of augmentation with two antipsychotics in patients who failed to respond to both the initial and second antipsychotics.

RESULTS

In total, there were 660 (42.8%) and 243 (15.7%) responders to an initial and a second antipsychotic, respectively; thus, 58.5% of all patients were responders to an initial or second antipsychotic. Among 581 nonresponders (37.7%), the initial antipsychotic or a third antipsychotic was added to the second antipsychotic. Among these patients, 89.8% showed a Clinical Global Impression-Improvement score ≤3 (from 'minimally improved' to 'very much improved'). The rates of adverse events such as hyperglycemia, hyper-low-density lipoprotein cholesterolemia, hypertriglyceridemia, hyperprolactinemia, QTc prolongation, and extrapyramidal symptoms were not high in patients receiving augmentation with two antipsychotics compared with all patients, and no serious adverse events were reported.

CONCLUSION

Antipsychotic augmentation may be an option in acute-phase treatment for patients who do not respond to either an initial or a second antipsychotic.