Risk factors for the development of flank hernias and bulges following surgical flank approaches to the kidney in adults

Is percutaneous nephrolithotripsy feasible in ipsilateral lumbar incisional hernia? A report of two patients

Incisional hernia refers to an abdominal wall defect at the site of a previous surgical incision. In this paper, we describe two patients who previously underwent open kidney stone surgery several years ago and had the ipsilateral recurrent stones. They were both managed by a mini percutaneous nephrolithotripsy (PCNL) to treat kidney stones. Case 1 was a 50-year-old female with right recurrent staghorn stones after 5 years of open surgery and required two PCNL procedures to achieve stone-free status. Case 2 was a 74-year-old male with significant comorbidities who had a right 27 mm recurrent kidney stone after 10 years of open nephrolithotomy. Both patients experienced no postoperative complications after PCNL. These cases show that in cases of lumbar incisional scar hernias, mini PCNL with ultrasound guidance and proper patient positioning can be an optimal approach for kidney stone treatment.

Systematic review and meta-analysis of the incidence of incisional hernia in urological surgery

PURPOSE

To evaluate the incidence of incisional hernia in patients undergoing direct access to the abdominal cavity in urological surgery.

METHODS

We conducted a systematic review in Pubmed, Embase, and Cochrane Central from 1980 to the present according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-analysis (PRISMA) statement. Eighty-four studies were selected for inclusion in this analysis, and meta-analysis and meta-regression were performed.

RESULTS

The total incidence in the 84 studies was 4.8% (95% CI 3.7% - 6.2%) I2 93.84%. Depending on the type of incision, it was higher in the open medial approach: 7.1% (95% CI 4.3%-11.8%) I2 92.45% and lower in laparoscopic surgery: 1.9% (95% CI 1%-3.4%) I2 71, 85% According to access, it was lower in retroperitoneal: 0.9% (95% CI 0.2%-4.8%) I2 76.96% and off-midline: 4.7% (95% CI 3.5%-6.4%) I2 91.59%. Regarding the location of the hernia, parastomal hernias were more frequent: 15.1% (95% CI 9.6% - 23%) I2 77.39%. Meta-regression shows a significant effect in reducing the proportion of hernias in open lateral, laparoscopic and hand-assisted compared to medial open access.

CONCLUSION

The present review finds the access through the midline and stomas as the ones with the highest incidence of incisional hernia. The use of the lateral approach or minimally invasive techniques is preferable. More prospective studies are warranted to obtain the real incidence of incisional hernias and evaluate the role of better techniques to close the abdomen.

A Case of an Atraumatic Posterior Perirenal Lumbar Hernia

Retroperitoneal lumbar hernias are a rare entity. Atraumatic posterior perirenal hernias are an exceptionally rare form of retroperitoneal lumbar hernias. Because of their infrequency, there are no standardized methods of surgical care for the treatment of atraumatic (primary spontaneous) posterior perirenal hernias. This report documents the finding and management of an atraumatic posterior perirenal lumbar hernia in a 69-year-old female.

Permanent Flank Bulge after Flank Incision: Patient- and Physician-Reported Outcome

INTRODUCTION

The aim of this study was to determine the incidence and risk factors for postoperative flank bulging and associated physiologic/psychologic consequences as well as to establish a clinical flank bulge classification system after open retroperitoneal surgery.

METHODS

In this retrospective study, a postal patient survey was sent to 240 patients who underwent open retroperitoneal surgery between 2007 and 2017. Patients, who reported a flank bulge, were invited for further evaluation, which included a clinical examination and standardized photo documentation.

RESULTS

Forty-three of 120 patients (35.8%) reported a flank bulging after retroperitoneal surgery. During clinical examination, a flank bulge could be confirmed in 25 patients, whereas in 18 patients, no bulging could be detected, leading to a corrected rate of flank bulge-positive patients of 20.8%. The corresponding relaxation values ranged from 1 to 1.44 and correlated with the clinical degree of bulging. A body mass index of ≥25 was identified as a risk factor. No correlation was found regarding age, gender, surgery side, access to the retroperitoneum, surgical procedure, and pathology. Thirty-seven patients complained about chronic pain or suffered from the cosmetic impact of bulging. Thirteen of those patients had shown a flank bulge during clinical examination, resulting in a symptomatic bulge rate of 10.8% (13/120 patients).

CONCLUSION

Chronic pain and postoperative flank bulging are 2 of the most common long-term complications after open retroperitoneal access. If an open retroperitoneal approach is required, particularly obese patients should be thoroughly informed about the risk of flank bulging and chronic pain.

Incisional Lumbodorsal Hernias Following Retroperitoneal Robotic Partial Nephrectomies for Small Renal Masses at a High-Volume Tertiary Referral Center

Introduction: Herein we evaluate the incidence of incisional lumbodorsal hernia (ILDH) after retroperitoneal robotic partial nephrectomy (RRPN) and associated patient-specific and tumor-specific risk factors. Furthermore, we aim to evaluate the role of routine lumbodorsal fascial closure for the prevention of ILDH. Methodology: This is a retrospective review of our robotic partial nephrectomy database of all RRPNs performed at Washington University School of Medicine from 2000 to 2020. Postoperative imaging was reviewed for evidence of ILDH. A clinically significant hernia was defined as the protrusion of visceral organ(s) through the lumbodorsal fascia. Patient and tumor characteristics, and fascial closure techniques were analyzed to determine predictors of ILDH. Results: In total, 150 patients underwent RRPN between 2007 and 2020 with an average follow-up of 4.9 (1-37) months. Twelve (8%) ILDHs were identified. Ten (6.7%) patients had herniated retroperitoneal fat whereas 2 (1.3%) patients had herniated colon. All were asymptomatic and managed conservatively. On matched cohort comparison, patients with ILDH had larger tumors than patients without an incisional hernia (3.9 cm vs 2.8 cm, p = 0.029). In general, patient factors were no different between patients with and without ILDH. However, coronary artery disease (CAD) was more prevalent in patients with ILDH (33.3% vs 10.9%, p = 0.028). Patients with ILDH were more likely to have a port site extended for specimen extraction (66.7% vs 38.2%, p = 0.069). Lumbodorsal fascial closure and type of suture material were not associated with prevention of ILDH (p = 0.545, p = 0.637). Conclusion: The radiographic incidence of lumbar incisional hernias after RRPN without routine fascial closure of the extraction incision was 8%. All were asymptomatic and did not require surgical repair. Larger tumor size and CAD were associated with ILDH.

Repair of lumbar incisional hernia using polypropylene mesh strip sutures - A case report

•

Lumbar incisional hernias are rare type of hernias constituting about 1.5% of all ventral hernias.

•

Diagnosis is mainly through symptoms corelated with the CT scan findings.

•

Repair of these lateral hernias is challenging due to its proximity to the 12 rib and iliac bone.

•

Use of mesh strip sutures is a newer concept and may be an effective way to repair lumbar incisional hernias.

•

Mesh sutures have demonstrated better resistance to suture pull-through when compared to conventional polypropylene sutures.

Introduction

Lumbar hernias are considered rare and they constitute less than 1.5% of all abdominal wall hernias.

Case report

Here we present a case of a 72-year-old female with a left flank swelling since 2-years diagnosed as a lumbar incisional hernia. This lumbar incisional hernia1 was repaired successfully using polypropylene mesh strip sutures.2

Discussion

Many surgical techniques have been described for repair of LIH. Suture repair, mesh repair and myofascial flaps have been described for lumbar hernias. Repairing a lumbar hernia can be surgically challenging because of its proximity to bony structures, which can limit proper dissection and mesh overlap. We performed defect closure with PMSS. Patient has no recurrence after 2 years of follow up.

Conclusion

In our case of left lumbar incisional hernia, defect closure with PMSS was an effective operation. This technique may also be effective in potentially contaminated settings due to reduced implant load. Further studies are required to understand its biomechanics and long-term outcomes.

Preventing incisional ventral hernias: important for patients but ignored by surgical specialities? A critical review

PURPOSE

Incisional ventral hernias (IHs) are a common complication across all surgical specialities requiring access to the abdomen, pelvis, and retroperitoneum. This public health issue continues to be widely ignored, resulting in appreciable morbidity and expenses. In this critical review, the issue is explored by an interdisciplinary group.

METHODS

A group of European surgeons encompassing representatives from abdominal wall, vascular, urological, gynecological, colorectal and hepato-pancreatico-biliary surgery have reviewed the occurrence of His in these disciplines.

RESULTS

Incisional hernias are a major public health issue with appreciable morbidity and cost implications. General surgeons are commonly called upon to repair IHs following an initial operation by others. Measures that may collectively reduce the frequency of IH across specialities include better planning and preparation (e.g. a fit patient, no time pressure, an experienced operator). A minimally invasive technique should be employed where appropriate. Our main recommendations in midline incisions include using the 'small bites' suture technique with a ≥ 4:1 suture-to-wound length, and adding prophylactic mesh augmentation in patients more likely to suffer herniation. For off-midline incisions, more research of this problem is essential.

CONCLUSION

Meticulous closure of the incision is significant for every patient. Raising awareness of the His is necessary in all surgical disciplines that work withing the abdomen or retroperitoneum. Across all specialties, surgeons should aim for a < 10% IH rate.

Single- vs multiple-layer wound closure for flank incisions: results of a prospective, randomised, double-blinded multicentre study

OBJECTIVE

To compare the incidence of postoperative flank bulges between patients with multiple-layer closure and single superficial-layer closure after retroperitoneal surgery via open flank incision in the SIngle versus MUltiple-LAyer wound Closure for flank incision (SIMULAC) trial.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The study was a randomised controlled, patient- and assessor-blinded, multicentre trial. Between May 2015 and February 2017, 225 patients undergoing flank incisions were randomised 1:1 to a multiple-layer closure (SIMULAC-I) or a single superficial-layer closure (SIMULAC-II) group. The primary outcome was the occurrence of a flank bulge 6 months after surgery.

RESULTS

Overall, 177 patients (90 in SIMULAC-I, 87 in SIMULAC-II) were eligible for final assessment. The cumulative incidence of a flank bulge was significantly higher in the SIMULAC-II group (51.7%) compared to the SIMULAC-I group [34.4%; odds ratio (OR) 2.04, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.11-3.73; P = 0.02]. Rate of severe postoperative complications (4.4% SIMULAC-I vs 10.3% SIMULAC-II; P = 0.21) or hernia (6.7% SIMULAC-I vs 10.3% SIMULAC-II; P = 0.59) was similar between the groups. There was no difference in pain (visual analogue scale) and the requirement for pain medication at 6 months postoperatively. Quality of life assessed with the European Quality of Life 5 Dimensions Questionnaire was higher in the SIMULAC-I group compared to the SIMULAC-II group at 6 months postoperatively, with a (median range) score of 80 (30-100) vs 75 (5-100) (P = 0.012).

CONCLUSION

The overall risk of a flank bulge after flank incision is high. Multiple-layer closure after flank incision should be performed as a standard procedure.

A New Surgical Technique of Combination Retroperitoneal with Transperitoneal Laparoscopic Nephroureterectomy in a Single Position and Comparative Outcomes

Background

The traditional surgical treatment for upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) is time-consuming owing to changing the surgical position and larger surgical trauma because of open surgery in handling the distal ureter. Therefore, we created a new surgical technique of combination retroperitoneal with transperitoneal (CRT) laparoscopic nephroureterectomy (LNU) in a single position and here report our early outcomes.

Methods

From January 2017 to December 2019, a total of 106 patients underwent LNU by a single surgeon at our department, of whom 50 patients underwent standard technique and 56 patients underwent CRT technique. Relevant clinical data were collected including each patient’s characteristics, surgical outcomes, and follow-up results. A comparative analysis between standard LNU cases and CRT LNU cases was performed.

Results

LNU was performed successfully on all 106 patients. There was no significant difference in patients’ characteristics. Compared to the standard group, patients in the CRT group had shorter operative time (P=0.001), less estimated blood loss (EBL) (P<0.001), lower visual analogue scale (VAS) pain score (P=0.020) and less scarring (P=0.013). The median time of surgical drain stay decreased from 5 to 2 days (P=0.004) and median hospital stay after surgery decreased from 5 to 3 days (P=0.001). The complication rates did not show statistical differences between the two groups within the first 30 days postoperatively (P=0.263). For the long-term complications, the incidence of abdomen bulge or incisional hernia in the CRT group was less than that in the standard group (P<0.001).

Conclusion

The CRT technique, which combines both the advantages of retroperitoneal and transperitoneal approaches, is a more minimally invasive, simplified and effective way to perform the LNU.