Optimal Aspergillus fumigatus and Asp f 1 serum IgG cut-offs for the diagnosis of allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis

Allergic bronchopulmonary mycosis in Schizophyllum commune with positive Aspergillus-specific IgE antibodies: A case report

Schizophyllum commune is the third most common causative fungus of allergic bronchopulmonary mycosis(ABPM). Two-thirds of ABPM caused by S. commune can be positive for Aspergillus fumigatus-specific IgE, which can be difficult to diagnose. Our patient presented to our hospital with wet cough for 3 months and chest pain for 3 days. Blood tests showed IgE 1522 IU/mL, eosinophils 688/mm3, A. fumigatus -specific IgE 2.24 UA/mL, and chest computed tomography showed high-attenuation mucus. Bronchoscopy showed mucus plugs and speculum examination showed filamentous fungi, but various culture tests did not detect A. fumigatus, Asp f 1-specific IgE was negative, and S. commune was detected in the culture of bronchial washing. Since he was positive for S. commune-specific IgE and IgG, he diagnosed ABPM caused by S. commune. These findings demonstrate the importance of identifying the causative fungus in ABPM by detailed examination.

Revised ISHAM-ABPA working group clinical practice guidelines for diagnosing, classifying and treating allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis/mycoses

BACKGROUND

The International Society for Human and Animal Mycology (ISHAM) working group proposed recommendations for managing allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis (ABPA) a decade ago. There is a need to update these recommendations due to advances in diagnostics and therapeutics.

METHODS

An international expert group was convened to develop guidelines for managing ABPA (caused by Aspergillus spp.) and allergic bronchopulmonary mycosis (ABPM; caused by fungi other than Aspergillus spp.) in adults and children using a modified Delphi method (two online rounds and one in-person meeting). We defined consensus as ≥70% agreement or disagreement. The terms "recommend" and "suggest" are used when the consensus was ≥70% and <70%, respectively.

RESULTS

We recommend screening for A. fumigatus sensitisation using fungus-specific IgE in all newly diagnosed asthmatic adults at tertiary care but only difficult-to-treat asthmatic children. We recommend diagnosing ABPA in those with predisposing conditions or compatible clinico-radiological presentation, with a mandatory demonstration of fungal sensitisation and serum total IgE ≥500 IU·mL-1 and two of the following: fungal-specific IgG, peripheral blood eosinophilia or suggestive imaging. ABPM is considered in those with an ABPA-like presentation but normal A. fumigatus-IgE. Additionally, diagnosing ABPM requires repeated growth of the causative fungus from sputum. We do not routinely recommend treating asymptomatic ABPA patients. We recommend oral prednisolone or itraconazole monotherapy for treating acute ABPA (newly diagnosed or exacerbation), with prednisolone and itraconazole combination only for treating recurrent ABPA exacerbations. We have devised an objective multidimensional criterion to assess treatment response.

CONCLUSION

We have framed consensus guidelines for diagnosing, classifying and treating ABPA/M for patient care and research.

Sensitivity and specificity of LDBio Aspergillus ICT lateral flow assay for diagnosing allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis in adult asthmatics

BACKGROUND

Aspergillus fumigatus-specific IgG estimation is crucial for diagnosing allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis (ABPA). A point-of-care LDBio immunochromatographic lateral flow assay (LFA) had 0%-90% sensitivity to detect IgG/IgM antibodies against A. fumigatus.

OBJECTIVE

To assess the accuracy of LDBio-LFA in diagnosing ABPA, using the modified ISHAM-ABPA working group criteria as the reference standard. The secondary objective was to compare the diagnostic performance between LDBio-LFA and A. fumigatus-specific IgG (cut-offs, 27 and 40 mgA/L), using a multidisciplinary team (blinded to A. fumigatus-IgG and LDBio-LFA results) diagnosis of ABPA as the reference standard.

METHODS

We prospectively enrolled adult subjects with asthma and ABPA. We performed the LDBio-LFA per the manufacturer's recommendations. We used the commercially available automated fluorescent enzyme immunoassay for measuring serum A. fumigatus-specific IgG. We used the same serum sample to perform both index tests. The tests were performed by technicians blinded to the results of other tests and clinical diagnoses.

RESULTS

We included 123 asthmatic and 166 ABPA subjects, with a mean ± SD age of 37.4 ± 14.4 years. Bronchiectasis and high-attenuation mucus were seen in 93.6% (146/156) and 24.3% (38/156) of the ABPA subjects. The sensitivity and specificity of LDBio-LFA in diagnosing ABPA were 84.9% and 82.9%, respectively. The sensitivity of serum A. fumigatus-specific IgG ≥27 mgA/L was 13% better than LDBio-LFA, with no difference in specificity. There was no significant difference in sensitivity and specificity between LDBio-LFA and serum A. fumigatus-IgG ≥40 mgA/L.

CONCLUSION

LDBio-LFA is a valuable test for diagnosing ABPA. However, a negative test should be confirmed using an enzyme immunoassay.

Clinical characteristics of allergic bronchopulmonary mycosis caused by Schizophyllum commune

BACKGROUND

Allergic bronchopulmonary mycosis (ABPM) is an allergic disease caused by type I and type III hypersensitivity to environmental fungi. Schizophyllum commune, a basidiomycete fungus, is one of the most common fungi that causes non-Aspergillus ABPM.

OBJECTIVE

Herein, we attempted to clarify the clinical characteristics of ABPM caused by S. commune (ABPM-Sc) compared with those of allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis (ABPA).

METHODS

Patients with ABPM-Sc or ABPA were recruited from a nationwide survey in Japan, a multicenter cohort, and a fungal database at the Medical Mycology Research Center of Chiba University. The definition of culture-positive ABPM-Sc/ABPA is as follows: (1) fulfills five or more of the 10 diagnostic criteria for ABPM proposed by Asano et al., and (2) positive culture of S. commune/Aspergillus spp. in sputum, bronchial lavage fluid, or mucus plugs in the bronchi.

RESULTS

Thirty patients with ABPM-Sc and 46 with ABPA were recruited. Patients with ABPM-Sc exhibited less severe asthma and presented with better pulmonary function than those with ABPA (p = 0.008-0.03). Central bronchiectasis was more common in ABPM-Sc than that in ABPA, whereas peripheral lung lesions, including infiltrates/ground-glass opacities or fibrotic/cystic changes, were less frequent in ABPM-Sc. Aspergillus fumigatus-specific immunoglobulin (Ig)E was negative in 10 patients (34%) with ABPM-Sc, who demonstrated a lower prevalence of asthma and levels of total serum IgE than those with ABPM-Sc positive for A. fumigatus-specific IgE or ABPA.

CONCLUSIONS

Clinical characteristics of ABPM-Sc, especially those negative for A. fumigatus-specific IgE, differed from those of ABPA.

Laboratory biomarkers in the diagnosis and follow-up of treatment of allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis in cystic fibrosis

Allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis (ABPA), a severe inflammatory respiratory disease, is caused by a hypersensitivity reaction to the colonization of the airways with Aspergillus fumigatus. It is most often described in patients with asthma or cystic fibrosis. The diagnosis of ABPA is based on a combination of clinical, radiological, and immunological findings that have been included in different diagnostic criteria over the years. In this paper, we review the biomarkers included in these diagnostic criteria and novel research biomarkers that may be used in the diagnosis and treatment follow-up of ABPA in cystic fibrosis.

Comparative diagnostic accuracy of immunoprecipitation versus immunoassay methods for detecting A.fumigatus-specific IgG in allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The diagnostic accuracy of immunoassays versus immunoprecipitation methods for detecting A.fumigatus-specific IgG in patients with allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis (ABPA) complicating asthma remains unclear.

METHODS

We performed a systematic review to identify studies describing both the methods in the same ABPA subjects. We assessed study quality using the QUADAS-2 tool. We derived the relative sensitivity and specificity using the HSROC meta-regression model. We calculated the number-needed-to-test using an immunoassay to detect one additional positive test in ABPA.

RESULTS

Our search yielded 20 studies (796 ABPA, 929 controls). The studies had a high risk of bias. The summary estimates for sensitivity and specificity of immunoprecipitation methods were 68.6% (95% CI, 48.4-83.5) and 93.8% (95% CI, 83.6-97.8), while for immunoassays they were 85.2% (95% CI, 73.3-92.3) and 84.6% (95% CI, 76.0-90.5), respectively. The relative sensitivity and specificity of immunoassays compared to immunoprecipitation tests were 1.29 (95% CI, 1.1-1.6) and 0.91 (95% CI, 0.85-0.97), respectively. The automated immunoassays (1.77; 95% CI, 1.1-2.8) had better relative sensitivity than the manual (1.1; 95% CI, 1.02-1.18) assays compared to immunoprecipitation. The relative specificity of manual immunoassays (0.95; 95% CI, 0.91-0.99) was significantly lower, while that of automated (0.88; 95% CI, 0.77-1.0) assays was lower but not statistically different. One additional positive result was detected for every 6 (95% CI, 5-7) tests performed with immunoassay (versus immunoprecipitation).

CONCLUSION

Manual immunoassays have higher sensitivity and lower specificity, while automated immunoassays have higher sensitivity and similar specificity than immunoprecipitation methods for detecting A.fumigatus-IgG in patients with ABPA.